"Borey" number six will receive the name "Prince Suvorov"

80
The sixth fourth-generation submarine missile cruiser (project 955-A, cipher Borey-A), which will be laid down at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk in December, will be given the name Prince Suvorov, the newspaper reports MIC with reference to the press service of the plant.

"Borey" number six will receive the name "Prince Suvorov"


Soon, Sevmash will hand over to the Navy the third cruiser Vladimir Monomakh. “He successfully and on time completed all stages of factory, state tests,” the press service said. - In December, the acceptance certificate of the transfer of the ship to the Navy will be signed the fleet».

"Other submarines of this project (" Prince Vladimir "and" Prince Oleg ") are undergoing the slipway period," the report says.

The Borei submarines, armed with the Bulava ballistic missiles, will become the backbone of Russia's naval nuclear forces for the coming decades. A total of 2020 "Boreev" will be built before 8. Three of them (955 project) will carry 16 MBRs and 5 (955-A project) - 20 MBRs.

Help "MIC": "The head missile carrier project 955" Borey "- Yuri Dolgoruky", as well as the first serial ship - Alexander Nevsky, built on the "Sevmash", were transferred to the Russian Navy at the beginning and end of 2013, respectively. The third submarine "Vladimir Monomakh" will be handed over to the fleet in December of this year. On the stocks, enterprises are being built according to the improved design of 955A of the submarine "Prince Vladimir" and "Prince Oleg" laid down in 2012 and 2014. "
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    80 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +25
      22 October 2014 09: 30
      Good news again, the positive trend among our shipbuilders continues.
      1. +5
        22 October 2014 09: 45
        not even again) but again and again) with such news, you tune in to positive
        1. +3
          22 October 2014 10: 09
          One thing can be said, all this is very pleasing!
          1. 0
            22 October 2014 14: 08
            Is information checked before publication? I’ve read many times that the 955a project differs from 955 in less noise, noticeability and better survivability, but not in the number of ICBMs!
            I will give even links:
            http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20130220/923813018.html
            http://russian.people.com.cn/31519/8137652.html
            1. +1
              22 October 2014 17: 35
              Quote: р_у_с_с_к_и_й
              The 955 project from 955 is less noisy, noticeable and better survivable, but not by the number of ICBMs !!

              This message of the year 2 already, probably!
              - 2013 February 17-20 - in a series of publications in the media and in an interview with television, the first deputy general director of PO "Sevmash" Sergei Marichev, it is reported that for 2013 the plant has the following plans for testing SSBNs:
              - "Prince Vladimir" (project "Borey-A") - in 2013 it is planned to complete the assembly of the ship's solid hull with hydraulic tests of the solid hull. The ship is distinguished by the use of equipment made on a new element base, while maintaining unchanged weapons systems. A media source in the military-industrial complex reports that the number of missiles on SSBN pr.955A will remain the same.
              Then Shoigu repeated it ... But the editors of the site do not have a sailor, so the inaccuracy already appears twice in VO articles.
              Sincerely.
      2. +6
        22 October 2014 10: 54
        "By the imperial decree of August 8 (19), 1799, Field Marshal, Count Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov-Rymniksky, was elevated, with his descending descendants, into the princely Russian Empire with the title of Prince of Italy and commanded him to be called henceforth the Prince of Italy Count Suvorov-Rymniksky."
        1. 0
          22 October 2014 13: 03
          Is it really necessary to have "princes" in the navy, haven't they found no less loud names with a naval history?
          1. +1
            22 October 2014 16: 15
            Quote: aleks
            Is it really necessary to have "princes" in the navy, haven't they found no less loud names with a naval history?

            WELL WHAT YOU, RIGHT! Of course there is. For example, the patron saint of the Russian army of the naval Admiral F.F. Ushakov. But the name is already taken! On November 22, 2011 in Kaliningrad, the Arktikmorgeo company launched a unique multipurpose engineering and technical vessel Fyodor Ushakov. (Before that, there were EM 956pr, TARKR, etc.).
            The great Russian naval commander F.F. Ushakov, just like A.V. Suvorov, who did not lose a single naval battle. And about the brilliant victory and the capture of. Corfu the great Field Marshal A.V. Suvorov wrote:
            "Hurray! To the Russian fleet! .. Now I say to myself: Why was I not near Corfu, even a midshipman!"
            This moment is beautifully played in the movie "Ships storm the bastions".
            A.V. Suvorov was canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church, and the cruiser pr. 68bis was named after him. Now this name will be worn by rpkSN - and rightly so! I think that the "strategist" will not disgrace this great name.
            IMHO.
            1. 0
              22 October 2014 23: 29
              In my opinion, the name of Ushakov should be borne by a "serious" battleship of the 1st rank, and not an engineering ship
    2. +2
      22 October 2014 09: 31
      well done --_ ----------- _
    3. +21
      22 October 2014 09: 33
      monomakh, nevsky, long-armed ... do not hesitate to continue the chain - Ivan the Terrible, Joseph Stalin. the two most forgotten rulers. although it’s clear that they have been banned from the beginning of liberal times. but nevertheless they did a lot! and earned thanks. I'm waiting ...
      1. +12
        22 October 2014 09: 37
        Vote next- "STALIN"
        1. +24
          22 October 2014 09: 41
          Vote next- "STALIN"

          So we’ll call an aircraft carrier laughing
          1. +14
            22 October 2014 09: 45
            All liberalism on loose stools will come out, if you call it that.
            1. +8
              22 October 2014 10: 14
              She already left the chair when the Dzerzhinsky was returned to its former name. Further only constipation.
        2. +1
          22 October 2014 09: 47
          Ivan groznyj. After Stalin, naturally.
        3. +5
          22 October 2014 11: 35
          Quote: dimdimich71
          Vote next- "STALIN"

          I am against, the boats are powerful, but still go under water. But Stalin's comrade was open and direct, so to speak, and visible to everyone. I think the Broadcasting Company (heavy missile cruiser) some sort with his name to lay.
        4. 0
          22 October 2014 15: 01
          Quote: dimdimich71
          Vote next- "STALIN"

          Borei - "princely" series. The name of Stalin, as already written above, would be great to assign to the new nuclear aircraft carrier.
      2. +8
        22 October 2014 09: 46
        Quote: ruslan
        continue the chain - Ivan the Terrible, Joseph Stalin. the two most forgotten rulers.

        Following, logically, should be Prince Kutuzov.
        1. +11
          22 October 2014 09: 59
          I did not mean a temporary chain. and deservedly. Suvorov is undoubtedly the pride of Russia, but a formidable one, for example, stopped the orgy of the Russian slave trade in Asia. on world wounds of slaves, even a crisis happened from a shortage of goods! but under his father Ivan 3 and at the beginning of his reign, up to 50 thousand people a year were driven into slavery !!! Really Ivan the Terrible did not deserve the ship in his honor from the descendants? I won’t write about Stalin anymore, for just one educational program, you can say no weak thanks!
          1. +1
            22 October 2014 10: 33
            Your story goes somehow parallel. How did Ivan 3 the Great suddenly become the father of Ivan 4 the Terrible if he is his grandfather? Father - Vasily 3. Next. Ivan the Terrible accomplished a lot of useful things for RUSSIA, yes, but after it the country rushed to the peak, which resulted in a long-term bloody turmoil. Bad associations, do not call it that. Word and thought have material power ...
            1. +1
              22 October 2014 10: 55
              absolutely true you specified. wrong. Basil 3.
              about superstitions. if you worry much about this, many names will need to be abandoned. each historical person can dig up flaws. So Suvorov, was very sickly and frail. poor association. fear now call the ship so?
              so you can dig into any name =)
              therefore, I do not agree here.
              1. +2
                22 October 2014 12: 10
                In fairness, it should be noted that Ivan IV the Terrible was undeservedly "forgotten" even under the Romanovs - if, for example, the names of some Rurikovichs (and Rurik himself as well) were called which ships, then the name of Grozny - not a single one ... ...
          2. +2
            22 October 2014 17: 44
            Quote: ruslan
            Really Ivan the Terrible did not deserve the ship in his honor from the descendants?

            Why not! Until recently there was RRC "GROZNY" pr 58. Before him there was a destroyer and canal boat. I think the tradition will continue. It would be something to call!
        2. +3
          22 October 2014 12: 55
          Quote: Vladimirets
          Quote: ruslan
          continue the chain - Ivan the Terrible, Joseph Stalin. the two most forgotten rulers.

          Following, logically, should be Prince Kutuzov.

          and if you call "Bagration"? will the Georgians go crazy? wassat
          1. 0
            22 October 2014 21: 08
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            and if you call "Bagration"? will the Georgians go crazy?

            Alas and Ah ... The name is already taken by the Dagestanis. Kizlyar cognac factory laughing
      3. +1
        22 October 2014 10: 17
        Why forgotten something? Hated by any shushera - yes. But even a shusher cannot forget them.
      4. +2
        22 October 2014 10: 35
        For Ruslan. In this series, Peter the Great and Catherine the Great are missing! And by the way, His Grace Prince Potyomkin-Tavriches has been undeservedly forgotten, he may be an ordinary commander, but the statesman is outstanding!
        1. Viktor Kudinov
          0
          22 October 2014 11: 51
          Guys, maybe the next to call Yuri Andropov. This was a special hope of the country.
      5. arnar114
        -1
        22 October 2014 19: 12
        The desire of the "new Russians" to refer to the times of tsarist Russia in the naming of ships does not impress me. "Whatever you call a ship, so it will float" is an old maritime omen. The destinies of the "sisterships" are always different, but if from the very beginning it will be so in life. The names of the Boreyevs echo the names of the ships of the 2nd Pacific Squadron who died at Tsushima .... I don't particularly support patriotic sentiments. I think that even though the ships are new, they are saturated with the equipment that is still available in warehouses, manufactured in Soviet times (60-70% of the volume). "Boreas" were developed in the 80s, for the equipment that existed at that time, which means that this equipment at that time (mostly) had already been mastered by the industry, and this is at least 5 years. This means that the technical assignment for its design was issued 5-10 years earlier. So this is a "Zhiguli" in a new building ... Although unfinished "leopards" were partially used for the construction of the building of the first "Boreis". "I blinded you out of what was!" "Borey" -Rubinovskaya boat, "Bars" -Malakhitovskaya boat. It turns out that the "Zhigul" is related to the "Muscovite" - craftsmen HOWEVER !!!!
    4. -22
      22 October 2014 09: 33
      What did they think when they chose the name ?!
      1. +10
        22 October 2014 09: 39
        Quote: Kibalchish
        What did they think when they chose the name ?!

        What are you thinking about Suvorov? About Prince Suvorov or about the one who under the nickname "Suvorov" carries the surname Lizun?
        1. -11
          22 October 2014 09: 46
          "Prince Suvorov" was already there. Killed at Tsushima, the flagship, in my opinion. The name is unfortunate.
          1. +9
            22 October 2014 09: 59
            Quote: Kibalchish
            He died under Tsushima, the flagship, in my opinion. The name is unfortunate.

            In fact, the armored cruisers Vladimir Monomakh and Dmitry Donskoy also died there. wink
          2. +7
            22 October 2014 10: 01
            The point is not that the ship was killed or not ...... If the ship was killed while keeping the flag in custody ...... this is a reason to be proud of it. And his name will worthily be carried by an underwater cruiser ................ We already passed when entire squadrons of submarines were called ... Smolensky, Kalininsky, Voronezh, etc. according to the list of cities - Komsomolets!
            1. +3
              22 October 2014 12: 59
              Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
              It's not that the ship died or not ......
              exactly! +! it’s one thing to get a bullet in the back, and another thing in the chest. To bend with dignity is to know what it was worth living for.
            2. 0
              22 October 2014 16: 31
              .We already passed when whole squadrons of submarines were called ... Smolensky, Kalininsky, Voronezh, etc. according to the list of cities - Komsomolets!
              Somehow this series of names sounds sad. The submarine "Komsomolets", which died in 1989, completes the list.
          3. +1
            22 October 2014 10: 38
            For Kibalchish. "Varyag" seemed to have died the same, but the death of death is different! So there is no need for such comparisons!
        2. +5
          22 October 2014 10: 17
          "Prince Suvorov" was already there. Killed at Tsushima, the flagship, in my opinion. The name is unfortunate.
          "Varyag" always exists in the fleet. There were many beautiful names in the Russian fleet "Sinop", "Borodino", "Eagle", "Andrew the First-Called"
      2. +5
        22 October 2014 09: 40
        Excellent memorable names of great people who are very remembered for their exploits !!! good What do you dislike? And what would you advise ???
        1. +10
          22 October 2014 09: 46
          He apparently about the battleship who died in the battle of Tsushima.

          So I do not understand, and now what? The ship died heroically while fighting for its country!

          А the name of the great commander is the name of the great commander!
          Too superstitious victory is not seen.
          1. -9
            22 October 2014 09: 49
            Yes, I'm superstitious. That is why the name did not like.
            1. +7
              22 October 2014 09: 57
              I understand. And superstition is not a vice unconditionally.

              But here you are now, and then a bottle of champagne will not break about it! Damn, I remember this dialogue, and also sovereign. hi

              In general, we will not exaggerate the meaning of the name.
              Let him go and threaten the adversaries until we build a new one in the port of Norfolk. soldier Yes
              1. pahom54
                +1
                22 October 2014 12: 28
                Quote: DEZINTO
                until we build a new one in the port of Norfolk


                Yes, you have super-imperial manners! Bravo, fully support!
            2. +3
              22 October 2014 11: 10
              Quote: Kibalchish
              Yes, I'm superstitious. That is why the name did not like.
              "Prince Suvorov" is a good name, do not worry, but, here, with the name of the cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov", indeed, it is not easy at heart (and here superstitions have soil). It would be better if Kalinin was renamed Rurik instead of Admiral Nakhimov. The armored cruiser "Rurik" essentially repeated the feat of the "Varyag", "Rurik" - an undeservedly forgotten name in our fleet.
              1. +1
                22 October 2014 11: 27
                sorry that Kursk will never be part of the fleet
              2. +3
                22 October 2014 11: 31
                You're right. Four Nakhimovs died. And again, the repair of a heavy RK with this name is heard. Maybe Allah will be enough for me ... to pull ?! Mercury. Memory of Mercury. Captain Kazarsky.
                1. +1
                  22 October 2014 12: 02
                  Quote: KBR109
                  Mercury. Memory of Mercury. Captain Kazarsky.

                  The feat of "Mercury" is generally one of the most glorious stories of our fleet.
                2. +3
                  22 October 2014 18: 04
                  Quote: KBR109
                  Mercury. Memory of Mercury. Captain Kazarsky.

                  CURRENTLY AS AN EXAMPLE! -- that says it all
    5. +2
      22 October 2014 09: 34
      Have you been discussing the first exit of the lead ship for a long time, eh? Bravo shipbuilders, the series was built quite quickly. You see, soon the new cruisers will be put on the slipway.
      1. +2
        22 October 2014 09: 40
        Next year they promise to lay 2 Borea and 3 Ash good
    6. avt
      +11
      22 October 2014 09: 36
      I want more ! So that there was "Citizen Minin" and "Prince Pozharsky"!
      1. -8
        22 October 2014 09: 44
        Quote: avt
        So that there was "Citizen Minin"

        And also "a former prince, and now a toiler of the East, a citizen of Gigienishvili" (C)
    7. +1
      22 October 2014 09: 37
      Where is Prince Potemkin-Tauride? :-)
    8. +1
      22 October 2014 09: 39
      But Suvorov was a count. Generalissimo Count Suvorov-Rymninsky.
      1. +5
        22 October 2014 09: 49
        Quote: VohaAhov
        But Suvorov was a count.

        In fact, in 1799 he became Prince of Italy. wink
      2. +5
        22 October 2014 09: 49
        In July 1799, the fortresses of Alesandria and Mantua fell. After the fall of the last letter of the Sardinian king Karl-Emanuel, on June 28, 1799, field marshal and commander in chief of the Allied Austro-Russian army, Count Alexander Vasilievich Suvorov-Rymniksky was elevated, by birthright, to the dignity of the prince, royal relative and grand kingdom of the Sardinian kingdom and made great Marshal of Piedmont.
        1. +1
          22 October 2014 10: 20
          just about, and his titles sound like this - Count Alexander Vasilievich Suvorov, Prince of Italy, etc., that is, in Italy he is a prince, but in Russia he is a count
          1. +1
            22 October 2014 10: 43
            Quote: saag
            Count Alexander Vasilievich Suvorov, Prince of Italy, etc., that is, in Italy he is a prince, and in Russia, the count

            "The highest rescript of Paul I of August 2 (13), 1799 allowed him to accept the aforementioned titles and use them in Russia."
          2. +1
            22 October 2014 10: 48
            You're not right. Suvorov was granted by Emperor Paul 1 the title of Prince of the Russian Empire with the title ITALIAN. Count Suvorov-Ramnik Prince of Italy.
    9. 0
      22 October 2014 09: 39
      Why not Prince Yaropolk? Oleg is, Vladimir is, there is no Yaropolk. Better then Alexander Suvorov hi
    10. +1
      22 October 2014 09: 40
      if 955A will be built as quickly as 955, then honor and praise .... by the way, but what about the second ash tree? to what degree of readiness is he ??? .... if anyone has reliable info .... please share))
      1. +1
        22 October 2014 18: 11
        Quote: gispanec
        if 955s are built as fast as 955,

        It is connected with this decision not to increase the number of silos, so as not to waste time replacing the rigging, slipway and others.
    11. 0
      22 October 2014 09: 40
      As Peter the Great said, if there are boats near the village on the river, then a power like Russia, washed by seas and oceans, must have its own mighty fleet !!! According to modern requirements, the submarine fleet is absolutely necessary !!! Only a mighty army and navy, the power of which stands like "three whales" on powerful supports: modern science and economics, a wise and far-sighted state policy and national pride of the Great Russians !!!
      That's all!!! Peace to our home - PLANET EARTH !!! hi
    12. +4
      22 October 2014 09: 42
      Pah-pah-pah. Well boreas are built. Continue in the same soul, a series of 8 is not limited to good
    13. 0
      22 October 2014 09: 42
      By the way, I am still surprised by the fact that the valiant ukropressa did not say that the "terrorists" are using Borei) It would be an ideal title. For example: Terrorists broke through the defense of Mariupol, fired at the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with sixteen cruise ballistic missiles. There are no losses among the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    14. +1
      22 October 2014 09: 43
      In total, 2020 Boreevs will be built before 8.

      But at first they planned 8 until 2018. Again, the deadlines have moved what
    15. 3vs
      +2
      22 October 2014 09: 45
      Or maybe Generalissimo Suvorov ?!
      It sounds!
      1. -4
        22 October 2014 10: 13
        Better "Field Marshal Suvorov".
        1. +2
          22 October 2014 10: 55
          Was it you who demoted him from the generalissimo? What if not a secret?
      2. +1
        22 October 2014 10: 37
        Somehow it happened from time immemorial that the title of nobility was somewhat "more creative" than the military rank.
        For example, the battleship was called "Prince Potemkin Tavrichesky", although Grigory Alexandrovich had a fairly high military rank "lieutenant general".
        And the young midshipman, having the appropriate title, was called nothing more than a baron. Satraps, what can you take from them ... smile
        1. 0
          22 October 2014 11: 12
          February 2, 1784 granted by the President of the Military College and the rank of General - Field Marshal of Russia. This is about Potemkin.
    16. 0
      22 October 2014 09: 50
      Great news, great submarine and named after the Great Commander. good drinks
      1. +1
        22 October 2014 13: 51
        Quote: Siberia 9444
        Great news, great submarine and named after the Great Commander. good drinks

        at least one adequately reacted, otherwise they almost got into a fight over the name! hot Russian Mlyn guys! : drinks :
    17. andruha70
      0
      22 October 2014 09: 55
      Fourth Generation Sixth Missile Submarine Cruiser
      Soon, Sevmash will hand over to the Navy the third cruiser Vladimir Monomakh.
      I am, of course, the "teapot" in the question of submarines what but according to the article - I did not understand. so there are three of them? or is it still six? what
    18. 0
      22 October 2014 09: 59
      Keep it up shipbuilders!
    19. 0
      22 October 2014 10: 02
      Great name for a decent ship! And so that the number of dives is equal to the number of floats.
    20. +1
      22 October 2014 10: 03
      It will still be, the names of Kutuzov, Dmitry Donskoy, Ivan the Terrible, Stalin and many more people whose names are firmly soldered into the history of Russia, who worked tirelessly and not sparing their lives for the good of Russia, will be immortalized. I believe in this.
    21. +1
      22 October 2014 10: 13
      Northwind is great. But the name is complete shit. It was not princes who won wars, but generals. And Alexander Vasilyevich himself always preferred a military rank.
      1. +6
        22 October 2014 10: 21
        totally agree - just "Suvorov"!

        Suvorov Derzhavin:

        - What epitaph are you writing to me?

        - many words are not needed: "Suvorov lies here"

        - God have mercy, - how good ..
      2. 0
        22 October 2014 19: 04
        Quote: Flinky
        But the name is complete shit. Not the princes won the war, but the generals. And Alexander Vasilyevich himself always preferred a military rank.

        Well, there are simply certain rules for naming sisterships. You could just call it Suvorov, but then the whole line had to be called Kutuzov, Barclay de Tolly, Bagration, etc., without titles and titles. Everyone understands. But to name after the "princely" boats, the next one - just Suvorov is not quite euphonious, but clumsy with the title. It was possible, I think, for the remaining three boats and other names of the ancient princes to remember, Rurik, at least, Yaroslav the Wise, Andrey Bogolyubsky.
    22. +2
      22 October 2014 10: 13
      now all attention to the Mace! and then they build boats, but they don’t go on combat duty

      P.S. return the firing article! at least in the military-industrial complex!
    23. +2
      22 October 2014 10: 14
      I wonder why "Prince" and not "Generalissimo"?

      Threat Generalissimo Joseph Stalin - a worthy name for the ship. With this is still weak.
      From the category "... what would you call a yacht" - strong, powerful, submerged and always a winner.
      And it is also 100% guaranteed: trolling of the entire liberal world, howling in the world press, yapping of neighboring countries of limitrophs.
    24. +1
      22 October 2014 10: 29
      And the question? why did France give such money for the Mistral? We are able and very well able to do everything ourselves !!!! And the name? - Lenin and Stalin can be, this is OUR story and we must respect it !!! and not to fail, like our liberals, therefore, there is no respect for us in the world.
    25. 0
      22 October 2014 10: 35
      I think there are few statements about the construction and commissioning of new submarines, show them in full glory in the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean! Yes, show so that the hairs on the pope stand on end! Here it is SUCCESS !!! hi
      1. -1
        22 October 2014 11: 10
        This is generally called -PONTS, so to speak. Say the hairs stand up! And many do not think that the tactics of the Americans are being repeated. The arms race is forcing huge funds to be diverted to weapons that have a useful life. Another thing is the latest and most promising technologies. So after all, everything is not the same. In my opinion Russia is again stepping on the "old rake".
      2. hoard
        +2
        22 October 2014 17: 01
        Quote: kolobok63
        Here it is SUCCESS !!!

        The best "show" for a sub is when it can only be seen at the exit / entrance to the base)))
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +2
        22 October 2014 18: 35
        Quote: kolobok63
        I think there are few statements about the construction and commissioning of new submarines, to show them in full glory in the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean!

        It's like a UNDERWATER STRATEG !!!! do you want to show ??? in the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean ... Above that, perhaps, to glance with a tude-syud !?
        No, the subfloor will not agree! Our main thing is HIDDEN !!! If there was a cap-invisibility-inaudible-non-name and removing the curvature of the Earth's magnetic field - that would be a royal gift! And so - pampering one!
        Quote: kolobok63
        Yes, show so that the hairs on the pope stood on end!
        It’s only "Ash" to float abeam Norfolk (the width of the waters is only 3 miles!) To raise the St. then it will be possible to say for sure:
        Here it is SUCCESS !!!

        And the success of the "strategist" lies in the fact that he silently left, silently came, AND NOBODY (except the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces) KNOWS: WHERE WAS? WHAT DID YOU DO?
        Yours! hi
    26. avt
      +2
      22 October 2014 10: 37
      Quote: saag
      , citizen of Gigienishvili "

      Well, let's say Minin was a Citizen under the tsar, but I would not refuse from the aircraft carrier Timur Apakidze! Well, Prince Bagration "to him and" Suvorov "to boot, respectively, they are without" Kutuzov "well.
    27. +1
      22 October 2014 11: 07
      With all due respect to this pilot, his name is not on a par with the names of Stalin Suvorov Kutuzov Potemkin Rokossovsky Vasilevsky
    28. 0
      22 October 2014 11: 12
      It would be faster to rearm our fleet and army, so that the West does not even stutter to affect us, and then take up the economy. If only there were smart PEOPLE at the helm of Russia and it would rise from nonexistence. VIVAT RUSSIA !!!
    29. +1
      22 October 2014 11: 38
      We still have many great NAMES.
    30. +1
      22 October 2014 12: 30
      Yes, the headlines would have sounded funny: "Today the Heavy Nuclear Aircraft Carrier Joseph Stalin went to the Mediterranean)
    31. +3
      22 October 2014 12: 46
      In our history there are so many glorious shipbuilders to build and build.
    32. 0
      22 October 2014 12: 48
      I don’t understand: they write that on the 955-A modification there will be the same 16 ICBMs. now they write about 20. where is the truth? request
      1. +3
        22 October 2014 17: 19
        On 955-16, and on 955А-20
        1. +1
          22 October 2014 19: 02
          Quote: Funnels
          On 955-16, and on 955А-20

          Back in 2013, it was announced that the number of mines would remain unchanged - 16. This is a general tendency to reduce the number of silos. On SSN-X, Americans plan --16 silos, the British in general - 12! This amount is optimal in size, cost, performance characteristics of the carrier.
          Sincerely.
    33. 0
      22 October 2014 12: 54
      I think the name of the missile carrier "Generalissimo SUVOROV" would have looked more impressive. GLORY OF THE RUSSIAN NAVY !!!!!!!
    34. BFG9000
      0
      22 October 2014 13: 43
      Good project, nice name! Good news.
      Hurry would replace all the old 667s
    35. 0
      24 October 2014 03: 59
      Number 6 is a symbol of harmony, it seems in the east. Good number overall. smile

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"