NATO Caucasian bridgehead

56
NATO Caucasian bridgehead


The center of NATO will appear in Georgia in 2015 year. This October 17 was announced by Defense Minister Irakli Alasania in an interview with Imedi TV. According to him, an agreement on this was reached by the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance during the September NATO summit in Wales.

- It will be the center of NATO and Georgia for exercises and assessments, it will be a joint center, but there will be the infrastructure of the Ministry of Defense, where both NATO military personnel and alliance partners will be trained, he added, adding that the center will also take place assessment of preparedness and certification of the trained.

According to local media, such a center can be located at the Wazian military base, but there is no official confirmation of this. For reference: on this base there were once Russian troops who left Georgia according to the decisions of the OSCE Istanbul Summit.

Alasania noted: a special logistics infrastructure is being created in parallel with the center - NATO countries will help Tbilisi with this.

- It was decided that the military exercises of the NATO countries will be held regularly in Georgia. Also, NATO ships will regularly visit Georgia.
According to him, "joint exercises of the military of NATO and Georgia will become another deterrent to the growing aggressiveness of Russia, seen from Georgia recently." The minister also said that NATO is sending high-ranking military officers to Tbilisi, who will monitor the implementation of the Georgia-NATO package. This package provides for the creation of a joint training base, a military school for the training of military personnel from different countries, a logistics center that will assist in organizing exercises, receiving and sending military of other countries.

“A group of NATO specialists will monitor the implementation of the package’s points under the General Staff of our armed forces,” Alasania said.
It should be noted that one training center on NATO standards is already operating in Georgia. Thus, as part of the bilateral Georgian-French military cooperation, France helped build a military base in Sachkhere, namely, a training center for mountain training. It is designed for simultaneous training of 130 military personnel, equipped according to the standards of the alliance, and entered service in early August of the 2008 year. During the operation to force Georgia to peace, when Russia inflicted crushing damage to Georgian troops, the French ambassador to Tbilisi, Eric Fournier, pointedly arrived at the mountain rifle base. According to media reports, of all the training camps where soldiers of the Georgian army were trained, only the base in Sachkhere survived. By the way, representatives of Armenia (by the way, the country is a member of the CSTO) at one time were trained under the program of mountain training on this basis.

It can be assumed that now we are talking about the appearance in Georgia of a larger center for training servicemen according to NATO standards, where emphasis will be placed not only on mountain training.

The editor-in-chief of the National Strategy Issues Journal, RISI Adjar Kurtov remarks: despite the changes that have taken place in Georgia’s domestic policy lately, the country's foreign policy toward joining the North Atlantic Alliance (taken by Eduard Shevardnadze) has not changed.

- The opening of the training center is not a landmark event. The fact is that when the Russian military bases were withdrawn from Georgia (from Batumi - 12-I military base, from Akhalkalaki - 62-I, from Vaziani - 137-I military base), then, as a rule, they were occupied not only by Georgian military personnel . Instructors from the same States or the North Atlantic Alliance appeared there.

A well-known fact: on the threshold of the tragic events of August 2008, Georgia was actively “pumped up” weapons and foreign experts. In this sense, the emergence of another training center is not critical for our security, that is, it will not be the weight in the balance that would incline the alliance to fulfill the dreams of Georgian politicians.

We remember the defeat of the trained army of Mikhail Saakashvili, so if the Georgians and the NATO members want it, then let them spend money. But if they turn up again, they will be rebuffed much faster and more seriously, because in this case, the Russian military will not have to overcome the Greater Caucasus Mountain Range, since, based on the norms of international law and bilateral agreements, they are currently deployed in Abkhazia and Republic of South Ossetia.

However, the Russian leadership should not be deceived. Although Georgia will not be accepted into the alliance, this does not mean that the military bloc will abandon its plans for the South Caucasus in general and for Georgia in particular. NATO will continue to create the appropriate infrastructure, to feed Georgian politicians with promises, to invent some kind of individual programs for Tbilisi, which are supposedly transitional steps to the alliance.

But it is important that with such methods Brussels (the headquarters of not only the European Union, but also NATO) gradually affects the overall situation in the region. If this center really opens in Georgia, then, probably, not only NATO, Ukrainian and Georgian military personnel will be trained there, but representatives of the South Caucasus states - Armenia, Azerbaijan will also be invited ... But Armenia is a member of the CSTO, Azerbaijan balances on different boards under the guise of being a member country of the Non-Aligned Movement.

Thus, Georgia is a kind of springboard for the penetration of NATO into the South Caucasus region. And the North Atlantic politicians are well aware that if they do not work and do not use the available opportunities (and they have opportunities in Georgia), then their competitors, Russia and those states that are interested in an alliance, will fill the “vacuum of power” in the South Caucasus Finally, it stopped expanding to where it should not expand a priori, since the very name of the bloc says that it is up to him to deal with security issues in the North Atlantic, but not in the South Caucasus.

The coordinator of the working group of the Center for the Study of Central Asia and the Caucasus of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexander Skakov also believes that the NATO Regional Center may indeed appear soon in Georgia, but for Russia this is not critical.

- This kind of creeping integration of Tbilisi into NATO continues, but there can be no talk of a full-fledged admission or provision of a clear action plan for the country's accession to NATO. This integration began a long time ago, it will continue further, but no one will accept a country that represents a danger to the bloc due to unresolved territorial issues. Therefore, the form of "soft expansion" is chosen.

I think the words of the Georgian Minister of Defense can be trusted, and such a training center can really appear, given the current nature of relations between Russia and NATO. As for our interests, the new agreement on alliance and integration between the Russian Federation and Abkhazia, which involves the creation of a unified armed forces - a kind of response to such plans of Georgia. And although Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili expressed concern about this fact, the treaty does not mean that Russia has taken a step towards any military measures, it’s just creating new dividing lines in the Caucasus, which is quite reasonable.

As for the seconded NATO military leaders, this is not news. Western experts have long been preparing the Georgian military, but as the 2008 events of the year showed, the cost of such training is nothing. Moreover, I do not think that the Georgian leadership will take any radical steps. Now in power there are more or less rationally minded people who are not eager to re-engage in military adventures. However, it is clear that the situation may change in the event of a global explosion in the entire South Caucasus, for example, if a new war begins in Nagorno-Karabakh. The conflict will inevitably tighten not only Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan into its funnel, but also the adjacent territories - namely Iran, Russia and Georgia ...
"SP": - In the media periodically there are reports of some disagreements between the former Prime Minister Ivanishvili and his creature - the current President Margvelashvili, between Margvelashvili and Garibashvili ...

- The leadership of Georgia is by no means a monolith, it is torn by contradictions. And, perhaps, these contradictions will only grow with time. While everything is more or less restrained, however, what will happen next and where it will lead is unknown.

- In this center any training can be conducted, on any profile. But the training of Georgian military personnel according to NATO standards reminds me personally of options in computer games, when, after some pumping, the characters get plus five points to strength and two plus - to endurance. All this is simply ridiculous and does not matter to us, ”said Alexander Khramchikhin, deputy director of the Institute for Political and Military Analysis.
The former member of the Georgian parliament, the head of the Institute of Management Strategy (Georgia), Peter Mamradze, believes that Defense Minister Alasania is bluffing.

- The fact is that the representative of the NATO information centers in Georgia made a much more moderate statement in response to the words of our minister. Moreover, situations where certain representatives of the Georgian leadership are bluffing, talking about NATO bases, centers, and even about the need for speedy integration, and then representatives of the United States or NATO disavow such messages from high tribunes, will not surprise anyone in Georgia. This has become regular. The fact is that our prime minister, who has all the executive power in his hands, cannot control all members of the government, and the same minister of defense has his own party, and therefore there is such a dissonance.

Meanwhile, an acute shortage of state thinking in our officials affects Georgian-Russian relations. In addition, NATO ships constantly come to us, American military leaders pay regular visits, and the Russian leadership sometimes reacts quite seriously to this.
Georgia (or what was left of it as a result of the destructive rule of Saakashvili) is already in a difficult situation, and only because Russia opened the doors to its market, has our agriculture come to life at least somehow ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    21 October 2014 21: 15
    Involuntarily recalls 08.08.08. and the question of the non-acceptance of Tiflis!
    And the question would be resolved!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +10
      21 October 2014 21: 38
      After consulting with the macaques, Sukashvili wanted this. Therefore, the Georgians so quickly threw everything and draped the race. And then: the Russians are coming, let NATO take over the calculation, I think it was like that.
      Here it is now. From the border to Kuev half a day on the tank. This is precisely what Kuev and Macaque counted on because of the puddle. No, the wrong country was called Honduras and the wrong country was Ukraine.
      Georgia wants to earn on lease.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +7
        21 October 2014 21: 48
        In vain they stopped our landing and armored convoys .. in vain Dmitry Anatolyevich .. first they pulled Tskhinval into a burning city and destroyed our checkpoint from tanks .. And when the Georgians ran away from ours (as they were taught by NATO instructors)))) ..? Here it begins again .. Eh Russia ... Epotyrkon Japan mom and Obama .. hi
        1. +1
          21 October 2014 22: 45
          but just lose those wretched from wine and Borjomi, and from fruits .., God as they say to help ...
        2. +5
          21 October 2014 23: 10
          This constant "brakes" and not only in Georgia, evokes strange, but not groundless thoughts that our leaders are not completely independent in making crucial decisions on the further security of our country!
          What do I mean, it’s not enough to win some kind of local battle, although this should be tried not only in words, but in practice with bloody losses!
          The main thing is to help those healthy political forces that would not be hostile to us, and not only in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but also in Georgia itself. After all, looking at the amers you clearly understand that they are achieving their goals by all available means, and wherever we go to the end, they and NATO military advisers immediately appear with far-reaching aggressive plans for Russia!
        3. WKS
          +2
          22 October 2014 00: 20
          Quote: DRA-88
          Involuntarily recalls 08.08.08. and the question of the non-acceptance of Tiflis!
          And the question would be resolved!
          And now a tidy sum from the budget would be spent on the maintenance of these loafers.
      3. +6
        21 October 2014 21: 49
        I don’t even want to write about Georgia, the “ardent Georgian friendship” in 2008, and even now it’s obvious.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +4
          21 October 2014 23: 39
          time

          I agree. ALL this has already happened .... I do not want to write ... tired, like mosquitoes in June or flies in August .... tired of all these small and "proud" ... well, not the state .... so what -that non-plentiful education ... well, tired ... soldier
      4. +1
        22 October 2014 00: 05
        Quote: Balu
        Let NATO occupy us calculation, so I think it was like that.

        it’s better to name the article - the Caucasian captive in NATO.
        1. 0
          22 October 2014 05: 42
          It seems to me that they are less afraid of Russia, more afraid of Turkey, there is a greater likelihood that Georgia will not be there and NATO will not, and we will travel by car to Turkey.
    3. Mih
      +2
      21 October 2014 21: 40
      Involuntarily recalls 08.08.08. and the question of the non-acceptance of Tiflis!

      So what? It was necessary to finish the Cove. soldier
    4. 0
      21 October 2014 22: 23
      the trumpet calls, the hero goes, the chainmail rings ..... (will end badly)
    5. 0
      22 October 2014 03: 41
      do not want to live peacefully!
    6. +1
      22 October 2014 06: 35
      In this matter, I completely agree with the West. Russia's response was inadequate. But for a friend’s reason, it would be more adequate to take Tbilisi, arrest Saakashvili and try him in Tskhinval by organizing a special Ossetian-Russian international tribunal.
      But History does not tolerate the subjunctive mood. It’s just that Medvedev’s gut was thin, and his brains were struck by democratophilia, as evidenced by the abstinence on the issue of closing the airspace of Libya.
    7. 0
      22 October 2014 07: 39
      Well, why is it - Tbilisi, and they would have to be fed and the invaders would have remained, even if they had put their own people there. And so the main task is solved, Georgia is far from NATO, and does not shine at all, but they will "love" those who are richer, so everything is in our hands.
      1. 0
        22 October 2014 08: 17
        Let's try to figure it out. The uptight war criminal Saakashvili would no longer have generated a host of subsequent problems in Georgia's relations with its northern neighbors. His image in front of the eyes of Ukrainian Natsiks would have made them stand up to decency. Already they would not have shouted outrageously "Maskalak at Gilyak", and would not have rushed so zealously into the "friendship trains" to beat people with bats in the southeast, and would hardly have dared to incinerate Odessa. And fighting in the brain was assessed differently in the sense of war crimes.
  2. 0
    21 October 2014 21: 15
    Although soft though hard, their expansion will not seem enough for anyone. Putin will quickly narrow everything down there and then expand it. angry
  3. avt
    +3
    21 October 2014 21: 15
    request Well, what else could he expect from them? It is strange that they had not settled there before. The fact that Georgia would be in one form or another of the NATO base was clear immediately after 1991. Well, after the kick received on 08.08.08. and even more so.
  4. +3
    21 October 2014 21: 19
    Or maybe our Rospotrebnadzor should look for any violations in the technology of production of Georgian wine?
    1. Mih
      +2
      21 October 2014 22: 27
      Or maybe our Rospotrebnadzor any violations in the technology of production of Georgian wine

      So it was already - Onishchenko, remember. lol Was right man fellow
      1. Sandah
        0
        22 October 2014 01: 58
        And it smells like shit for a long time!
  5. +2
    21 October 2014 21: 23
    The logical movement of Georgia against us ... the absolute majority of the Georgian people elected and came to power the enemies of Russia ... like Gamsakhurdia or two terms of Saakashvilli ... you just need to think about why Russia has ties with Georgia ... why do we need Georgians ??? ... it's time to think about a hard visa regime ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      21 October 2014 21: 34
      The mode is normal now. Take a ride (free entry for Russians) talk, ask about saak and gams.
    3. +7
      21 October 2014 21: 35
      Quote: silberwolf88
      The logical movement of Georgia against us ... the absolute majority of the Georgian people elected and came to power the enemies of Russia ... like Gamsakhurdia or two terms of Saakashvilli ... you just need to think about why Russia has ties with Georgia ... why do we need Georgians ??? ... it's time to think about a hard visa regime ...


      The Georgian people in general for the most part consist of terrible nationalists, for whom Georgians are higher beings, and the rest are subhuman.
      And the Georgian people forgot how many of these people remained in 1801, when the Georgian Tsar Irakli II bequeathed his throne to the Russian Emperor Alexander I, in order to save the remnants of the Georgians from the Turkish and Persian massacre.
      1. +5
        21 October 2014 21: 38
        I was in the summer, asked about 1801, people remember who saved them
      2. The comment was deleted.
    4. Mih
      +1
      21 October 2014 21: 36
      The logical movement of Georgia against us ...

      Georgia, movement against us? They, enjoyed impunity, because Stalin stood behind. Only a Georgian can have two winters (ZIM - Kadelak of the USSR) and a high 3-storey house. And these, now they say that we oppressed them? In jo ... am am am
      1. +8
        21 October 2014 21: 41
        [quote = Mih] [quote]
        Georgia, movement against us? They, enjoyed impunity, because Stalin stood behind. Only a Georgian can have two winters (ZIM - Kadelak of the USSR) and a high 3-storey house. And these, now they say that we oppressed them? In jo ... am am am[/ Quote]

        Stalin never defended Georgians. I recommend reading how Stalin acted with the leadership of the GSSSR Communist Party when this leadership began to solve its selfish problems under the guise of a personal acquaintance with you.
        1. Mih
          +1
          21 October 2014 21: 58
          I recommend reading how Stalin acted with the leadership of the GSSSR Communist Party when this leadership began to solve its selfish problems under the guise of a personal acquaintance with you.

          Yes, it’s like, Stalin was an ascetic. But you cannot deny that, using his authority, the leaders of Georgia violated the norms of the Soviet hostel. And these violations were outrageous. am
          1. +4
            21 October 2014 22: 02
            Quote: Mih
            [
            Yes, it’s like, Stalin was an ascetic. But you cannot deny that, using his authority, the leaders of Georgia violated the norms of the Soviet hostel. And these violations were outrageous.


            And I do not deny it. But Iosif Vissarionovich, for the fact that the leaders of Georgia, hiding behind friendship with him, "violated the norms of the Soviet community", took them all and SHOT.
            1. Mih
              +1
              21 October 2014 22: 17
              But Iosif Vissarionovich, for the fact that the leaders of Georgia, hiding behind friendship with him, "violated the norms of the Soviet community", took them all and SHOT.

              Shot, but not all! A pity. One had to be consistent. am
              1. 0
                21 October 2014 22: 32
                [quote = Mih] [quote]
                Shot, but not all! A pity. One had to be consistent. [/ quote]

                Do you understand what’s the matter, you can’t shoot everyone. No one will rule.
                1. Mih
                  0
                  21 October 2014 22: 38
                  No one will rule.

                  The question, of course, is interesting, but if you look at the latest history of Russia, you can find leaders - they all want to shrug. drinks
                  1. +1
                    21 October 2014 22: 41
                    Quote: Mih
                    No one will rule.

                    The question, of course, is interesting, but if you look at the latest history of Russia, you can find leaders - they all want to shrug. drinks


                    Many can drive, but rule ...
                    1. Mih
                      0
                      21 October 2014 22: 47
                      Many can drive, but rule ...

                      This is somehow according to Shakespeare, Hamlet. love
                      1. 0
                        21 October 2014 22: 51
                        Quote: Mih
                        Many can drive, but rule ...

                        This is somehow according to Shakespeare, Hamlet.


                        This is in my opinion.
              2. 0
                22 October 2014 01: 08
                [quote = Mih] [quote] But Iosif Vissarionovich, for the fact that the leaders of Georgia, hiding behind friendship with him, "violated the norms of the Soviet hostel", took them all and SHOT. [/ quote]
                Shot, but not all! A pity. One had to be consistent.
                I do not know how old you are, SW. Mih, but in any case, it’s not necessary to operate on a word to shoot, this is not the most beautiful word.
    5. Mih
      0
      21 October 2014 22: 14
      you just need to think about why Russia has ties with Georgia ... why do we need Georgians ???

      Really - why? wassat
    6. +1
      21 October 2014 22: 32
      Quote: silberwolf88
      why do we need Georgians ??? ... it's time to think about a hard visa regime ...

      yeah, you can only hear in the mailbox how in Moscow here and there they covered a gathering of Georgian thieves in law.
      And the question is: what have the "proud" highlanders forgotten in Russia? Would go to the ssashka.
      Yes, who will let them go.
      Just as the Georgian princes were tigers under tsarist Russia, they have remained to this day.
      1. +1
        21 October 2014 22: 37
        Quote: PATTIY
        Quote: silberwolf88
        why do we need Georgians ??? ... it's time to think about a hard visa regime ...

        yeah, you can only hear in the mailbox how in Moscow here and there they covered a gathering of Georgian thieves in law.
        And the question is: what have the "proud" highlanders forgotten in Russia? Would go to the ssashka.
        Yes, who will let them go.
        Just as the Georgian princes were tigers under tsarist Russia, they have remained to this day.


        Oh Olga. Bagration does not hear you.
        1. Mih
          0
          21 October 2014 22: 43
          Eh Olga. Bagration does not hear you.

          But we don’t have to touch our history - it's sacred (forgive me, Lord) soldier
  6. +2
    21 October 2014 21: 30
    Georgia "shies away" from side to side due to the venality of politicians, ie. piece "product" that has its own price. But the Ottoman Turks "wake up" and what? Where? History for whom? The Georgian princes, however, had more brains. hi
    1. Mih
      0
      21 October 2014 21: 38
      Georgia "shies away" from side to side due to the venality of politicians,

      There are all prostitutes, by and large. am
    2. 0
      21 October 2014 22: 52
      Quote: GrBear
      Georgia "shies away" from side to side due to the venality of politicians, ie. piece "product" that has its own price. But the Ottoman Turks "wake up" and what? Where? History for whom? The Georgian princes, however, had more brains. hi

      so, already from Adjara, Turkey comes into the impudent.
      In a nutshell: someone in the Georgian capital has taken a lot and is pushing hard a mosque from the Turkish clergy. It’s also not small, apparently, since the local Ajarian authorities do not want its presence in their land and are legitimately afraid of Islamization.
      The local head of Batum is under pressure and overt provocations. Yes, such that he stated in the media - a mosque in Batumi will only be through my corpse.
  7. Mih
    +2
    21 October 2014 21: 31
    The center of NATO will appear in Georgia in 2015 year. This October 17 was announced by Defense Minister Irakli Alasania in an interview with Imedi TV. According to him, an agreement on this was reached by the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance during the September NATO summit in Wales.

    Gruzdy is Europe. Yes, probably - Europe. There, such freaks only did not reach the full picture of surrealism. fellow fellow love
  8. +2
    21 October 2014 21: 32
    Curiously, will we "only defend"? When do the borders of the Great Americos burst into flames? Georgians, of course, are "fools", since they do not step on, but trample on a rake ... "He began to drive a mash out of cow feed. So he undermined his health, Pity HIS POOR!" But even during my lifetime I would like to see the reaction of the inhabitants of Texas or Oklahoma to "another Russian / Belarusian ... military base next to their border, or howls in the press about" military instructors "(about 500 people a month) in the jungle of Colombia lol
    1. Mih
      +1
      21 October 2014 21: 45
      a military base next to their border, or howls in the press about "military instructors" (about 500 people a month) in the jungle of Colombia

      And not Cuba? Prosral - Khrushch, Point played at the Ukrainians, only the Crimea could dispose of. feel
    2. +1
      21 October 2014 21: 51
      I propose to sell a submarine to the Colombian drug lords ... fellow
      1. Mih
        +1
        21 October 2014 22: 11
        INVESTOR
        I propose to sell a submarine to the Colombian drug lords

        Read the press! They have submarines for transporting drugs. Did I discover America for you? laughing
        1. 0
          21 October 2014 22: 15
          No, I knew that there were artisanal ones, but we’re kind of more to them ... fellow
  9. +1
    21 October 2014 21: 42
    they must be left to NATO's revenge. and when the goods are stripped off as sticky they themselves will crawl and repent !!!!!
  10. +12
    21 October 2014 21: 46
    When the Turks slaughtered the Georgians, because they crawled to Russia for help. We’ll see what happens this time ... Nearby the Kadyrov’s special forces are on the alert ...
  11. poultopwar
    +3
    21 October 2014 21: 51
    The Nazis are torn closer to Russia!
  12. +6
    21 October 2014 21: 52
    - It was decided that the military exercises of the NATO countries will be held regularly in Georgia. Also, NATO ships will regularly visit Georgia.


    What are they? Think Black-it's rubber? Oh, when will our submarines appear at the ChMF?

    PySy. damn, since childhood, I thought that the Georgians are our very best .... Someone said correctly, Russia has only two friends, the Army and the Navy!
    1. Mih
      0
      21 October 2014 22: 22
      What are they? Think Black-it's rubber? Oh, when will our submarines appear at the ChMF?

      The Doctrine of Montreux! love
      1. 0
        22 October 2014 02: 39
        Quote: Mih
        What are they? Think Black-it's rubber? Oh, when will our submarines appear at the ChMF?

        The Doctrine of Montreux! love

        Actually, this is the Montreux Convention - from Wiki
        The 1936 Montreux Convention is a convention that restored Turkey’s sovereignty over the Black Sea to the Mediterranean, adopted at the Conference on the Black Sea Straits Regime held on June 22 - July 21, 1936 in Montreux (Switzerland). At the same time, Turkey undertook to comply with the principles of international law of the sea.

        And the doctrine - Monroe - from Wiki
        The Monroe Doctrine is a declaration of the principles of US foreign policy ("America for Americans"), proclaimed on December 2, 1823 in the annual message of US President James Monroe to the US Congress.

        Do not confuse the warm with the soft.
  13. +2
    21 October 2014 22: 16
    The Georgian-cannibal caught the Georgian, put it on his palm and gently tickled his little finger with his belly: Wow, how funny! Georgian: Hand, listen, uberi, yes! laughing
  14. +5
    21 October 2014 22: 23
    Georgian thieves deported to their homeland to restore order
    1. Mih
      0
      21 October 2014 22: 33
      Georgian thieves deported to their homeland to restore order

      So there was a proposal, but Europe was indignant. tongue
  15. Mih
    +1
    21 October 2014 22: 26
    Quote: MIKHAN
    from starts again .. Eh Russia ... eptirkon japan mom and Obama ..

    Obama, Obama Mom. love
  16. +1
    21 October 2014 22: 28
    Everything is numb to sinkers, and they are looking for who would have raped them better laughing .
    1. Sandah
      0
      22 October 2014 02: 02
      Khokhlushki from VIA "Gra" they love them so much
    2. +3
      22 October 2014 02: 03
      relations (ratios) of the parties bully
  17. 0
    21 October 2014 22: 57
    Quote: sabakina
    What are they? Think Black-it's rubber? Oh, when will our submarines appear at the ChMF?

    What is not rubber is for sure. But deep, to the NATO ships, there is enough space at the bottom smile
  18. +1
    21 October 2014 23: 49
    This is all temporary, the Georgians are friendly and hospitable people, and they remember the story! AND BACK TO Mother Russia! First, Crimea, then Donbass and we laid them (the American monkey and other NATO)!
  19. +4
    22 October 2014 02: 00
    classics need to read laughing
  20. Viktor Kudinov
    +1
    22 October 2014 03: 11
    Night haze fell on the hills of Georgia. The proud Georgian people in the person of NATO have found a defender against impudent Russia. But NATO fears - not to get his face from Russia in the face ... angry
  21. +1
    22 October 2014 04: 00
    ... therefore, if Georgians and NATO want, then let them spend money. But if they turn up again, they will be repulsed much faster and more seriously,

    Nice words. But the a.measures don't want to hear them. I am not talking about Georgians - it is useless (since the collapse of the USSR, under the leadership of their "grief politicians" they look into the mouth of the United States).
  22. +3
    22 October 2014 04: 34
    Gruzdy is Europe. Yes, probably - Europe. There, such freaks only did not reach the full picture of surrealism.

    Note! In the photo they are posing with the EU flag!
    1. 0
      22 October 2014 11: 12
      Quote: vdtomsk
      Note! In the photo they are posing with the EU flag!

      this is the flag of the battalion
      1. +1
        23 October 2014 09: 25
        The larger photo shows that this is the EU flag.
  23. Leonidych
    +2
    22 October 2014 06: 15
    as the satirist Zadornov said, now the Americans have the largest NATO choir in the Caucasus) but seriously, the NATO people will once again manage the whole world.
  24. +1
    22 October 2014 07: 33
    Skins are corrupt in one word.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"