What is reputation and why did we do it? (Poll)

Do I need a raiting on the site (titles, epaulets)

Needed - 62 (59.62%)
59.62%
Only needed for negative rating - 4 (3.85%)
3.85%
Not needed at all - 15 (14.42%)
14.42%
Anyway - 23 (22.12%)
22.12%
Reputation, or rating, is made to assess the user's activity on our site.
Reputation is affected by voting for comments written by a registered user, as well as voting directly for a particular visitor in his profile.

In order to vote for a user, click on his nickname, and a pop-up window will open, where you can raise or lower his rating.

What is reputation and why did we do it? (Poll)

Also, the rating increases when adding your articles on the site.
Reputation affects the rank of the user, which is reflected in the form of epaulets under the avatar.
Bad that soldier who does not dream of becoming a general or even marshal .
With a negative rating, shoulder straps change to black: .
The higher your rank, the more you influence the rating of other visitors when evaluating their comments and voting for the user in his profile.

PS For all errors, comments, as well as your wishes write in the comments.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. figwam 9 August 2011 14: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    You can add a picture of a virtual weapon, the higher the rank, the more powerful a weapon beats an opponent. New epaulets like it more.
    When writing a new comment, the epaulet is displayed with a different rank with a negative rating. Then everything comes back to normal, but it is repeated every time.
    1. fantast 9 August 2011 15: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      When writing a new comment, the epaulet is displayed with a different rank with a negative rating. Then everything comes back to normal, but it is repeated every time.
      fix
      1. fantast 9 August 2011 23: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Bug fixed
  2. Smirnov Vadim 9 August 2011 14: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A small decoration of the site. :)
  3. Superduck
    Superduck 9 August 2011 14: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    By the way, it would be convenient if you clicked on the link from the "Recent Comments" block directly to the comment and not to the top of the page. This is done using the so-called. fragment, part of the link after #
    It will be very comfortable, thanks.
    1. fantast 9 August 2011 14: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I agree, we will try to implement
      1. fantast 9 August 2011 14: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        If you noticed, we added a new status to the comments.
        1. Superduck
          Superduck 9 August 2011 14: 37 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Yes, I noticed, it’s very convenient especially in the absence of what I wrote above, there are long branches of comments and it’s very difficult to find updates without this tag.
    2. fantast 9 August 2011 23: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Now, when you click on the link in the "Last comments" block, go to the first comment and all new comments have the status of "new"
      It seems so convenient to me?
      1. Superduck
        Superduck 11 August 2011 13: 11 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But in the branch where there is an active discussion of new ones, it happens with a dozen.
  4. figwam 9 August 2011 15: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Then you can add rewards in the form of medals and orders.
  5. Siberian
    Siberian 9 August 2011 15: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And why, with a negative rating, epaulettes change to black? Sorry guys. He gave his whole life to tank troops - it's a shame.
    1. fantast 9 August 2011 15: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Your suggestion? smile
      1. figwam 9 August 2011 15: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Can make it translucent or flickering, blinking.
        1. Superduck
          Superduck 9 August 2011 17: 09 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Nene, no flashing lights on the site! You are welcome!
      2. DAGESTAN333 9 August 2011 17: 30 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        fantast, with a negative rating, I propose to introduce MOPOva insignia ... wink
        1. fantast 9 August 2011 18: 30 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          We had such a thought, but it may offend many
        2. Superduck
          Superduck 9 August 2011 18: 38 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yeah, then it will be idiotic to incite a robot who will do 20-30 posts about the following content in the shadow: Pendos will pay for what they did! The Russian Empire is forcing everyone! But under the USSR this was not! And so on.
          And the general’s rating will be in a month to me. I think that a negative rating is more often an indicator that a person thinks not like everyone else, although he himself would kill some :-)
          1. fantast 9 August 2011 18: 51 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            exactly! There are frank trolls, and there are people with their own point of view, which the majority simply do not share
      3. Siberian
        Siberian 9 August 2011 20: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Could it be gray?
        1. fantast 9 August 2011 23: 36 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          As an option you can try
  6. merkawa
    merkawa 9 August 2011 16: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As in a joke: eyes so blue, light hair wink And in the end: what happens, what happens wink
  7. Superduck
    Superduck 10 August 2011 11: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    fantast, I meant the transition not to the general block of comments but to a specific message. Those. mark each message in the forum with the tag a name = "mes {ID}" empty, where {ID} is the unique number of the message in the database or just the serial number of the message in the thread, and from the "Recent Messages" panel give links with #mes { ID} at the end, then the transition will be to a specific message.
    1. fantast 10 August 2011 12: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, I understood it, but then there is a small nuance - if a person is not particularly aware of the dialogue, then it is more convenient for him to first read the message thread, and then express his opinion
      1. Superduck
        Superduck 10 August 2011 13: 16 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But if you write the message text in the Recent messages section, then the logic tells me that I will get to it when I click, on the other hand, it would be more logical to make the message text a link to the message, and the title of the article as now.
  8. Superduck
    Superduck 11 August 2011 13: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And it would also be great if, in case of impossibility to add a message, the window with it would not be lost, because sometimes you need to remove one strong nightingale and for this you need to retype it.
  9. mitrich
    mitrich 15 August 2011 19: 16 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    DEAR SITE ADMINISTRATORS!
    In my opinion, dear forum users ceased to express their opinion, everything began to boil down to a solid "Hugo - hold on!", "Gaddafi - forever!"
    People are chasing after the idiots on the idiotic epaulets that YOU introduced. This is a subconscious factor, especially among those who have never served or settled on the rank of private / corporal in REAL life.
    The forum is getting smaller from this; reading it is less and less interesting. And many, in my opinion, ceased to be interested in writing anything at all.
    In general, in my opinion, YOU have chosen the wrong path to encourage the initiative ...
    1. Smirnov Vadim 15 August 2011 19: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It does not depend on "lychek on idiotic epaulets." Look at any other side of the forum to see the same picture.
  10. mitrich
    mitrich 15 August 2011 19: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    My opinion:
    - encouragement should follow in proportion to the number of comments made, and not the opinion expressed in them;
    -if a forummer does not just write “Medveputov sucks!”, but talks about his experience, shares knowledge, not emotions, writes interestingly - then a double bonus.
    Then the forum will become truly interesting and readable.
    RESPECT TO YOU!
    1. Smirnov Vadim 15 August 2011 19: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It is up to you to rate such commentators yourself.
      1. Superduck
        Superduck 15 August 2011 20: 05 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, Mitrich is doing well with this matter. I believe that he is in many ways right to troll or throw stupid phrases in this matter much more profitable. I understand that this is an effective mechanism to stimulate activity on the site, but it turns out that approximately 5 regular commentators always get pluses, the second half - minuses.
        I would, and as I understand it, not only I would welcome the possibility of disabling the display of the title by means of account settings. However, and so I will survive.
  11. Superduck
    Superduck 15 August 2011 20: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And by the way, see flood protection has changed, false positives are frequent, you have to re-type the text again after reloading the page. In general, it seems to me that the flood here is not so much to tighten the system.
    1. Smirnov Vadim 15 August 2011 20: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Removed all protection from flooding, the default was 30 seconds.
  12. mitrich
    mitrich 15 August 2011 20: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I'm not MITRICH now. I am flood.
    1. Superduck
      Superduck 15 August 2011 20: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Not an uncle, I didn’t mean that you are a fluder, you are a rare example of adequacy. I said that it’s normal for you to have a rank simply.
  13. mitrich
    mitrich 15 August 2011 20: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Thank. I want to be a marshal, even virtually. But I will not love this wart of Zyuganov.
  14. Smirnov Vadim 15 August 2011 20: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Added poll, vote. According to the results, we decide whether we need a user rating on the site.
    1. APASUS 15 August 2011 21: 09 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I think a reward system is possible, but it should not look so defiant. People stopped thinking, expressing thoughts, began to chase the pursuit.
  15. slan
    slan 15 August 2011 21: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I think the system of military ranks and voting are mutually exclusive concepts. Of course, epaulets on this site are requested and the reputation on the forum, too, but in its current form the system is clearly unsuccessful. If at least a few people for this reason began to express their opinions less openly, the system needs to be changed. It’s certainly convenient, you see the tags and you understand that the person didn’t "pass by and blurted out", but stupidly by the number of messages is also not interesting. Maybe it’s differentiated somehow, there are officer ranks (junior, highest) Probably, moderators should be distinguished, authors ...
    In the vote you need to add the item "needed, but in a different form"
    1. Smirnov Vadim 15 August 2011 22: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Reputation changes from the number of comments is very insignificant and you will not earn a big rating from this, but who and how votes for these comments the rating changes, sometimes very significantly
      1. slan
        slan 15 August 2011 22: 16 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I understand that I’m just saying that, in my opinion, the reputation is useful in terms of obtaining information about the role of the person in the forum. And just in the current form you get this information in a distorted form. For example, a person is used to seeing regularly for a long time, and he is ordinary like the one with 10 posts, or a super-moderator-foreman along with ordinary urapatriot. For me, sergeant ranks would inform about activity, and then, then, for some merit, appropriate. Well, how many times a person has been praised, personally to me, is of little interest. And then we get a forum of cuckoos and cocks from a fable.
        1. Smirnov Vadim 15 August 2011 22: 30 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Who will assign titles, it is simply not realistic to trace everyone. And this system is fully automatic and depends entirely on your (users) actions.
          1. slan
            slan 15 August 2011 22: 54 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Of course, it’s automatic and necessary, except that senior officers can be assigned exclusively by the site administration. Just the criteria should be different - not a vote. You never know the merit on the forum: the number of publications, the registration period, the number of posts, other activity, and, finally, the evaluation of other users. But when at the forefront the last of this list will be completely dissatisfied. Especially when it's not just a digital, but a title. Not all vote and not always for the good, often minus the truth, again. Now the system, when some major general will eventually give a lie to the lieutenant general for the fact that he pluses his slogans, which are obvious but demanded by certain people, are empty to everyone.
        2. figwam 15 August 2011 22: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          We even get distorted information in state elections.
          And points and titles do not affect the ability to express their opinion, they only add drive. All in equal conditions.
          1. slan
            slan 15 August 2011 23: 25 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Well, here people write what they do not like, but should either like it, or it doesn’t matter.
  16. runway 23 August 2011 15: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In my opinion, many bloggers just play a "reputation."
    Developing “your” system (where you can gain more pluses ...), grouping according to the principles of “yours — a stranger”, supporting your own and pressing others.
    DO NOT REDUCE THEIR OPPORTUNITIES TO PLAY THIS GAME.
    But there are others - for which such games are no longer interesting. And they are on the site in order to find out the opinions of other people on the proposed issue. AND IT IS NOT IMPORTANT THAT THIS OPINION CONSENTS WITH YOURS! On the contrary, it is more interesting to find out another, but a reasoned point of view.
    And here there are various options for displaying the opinions of other bloggers. For example, in the form of two (several) indicators of different colors.
    In my opinion, technically this is not difficult to accomplish.
    I believe that all proposals made on this topic should pass a preliminary vote. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE VOLUNTARY CHOICE OF PLACE OF DISCUSSION MUST BE SAVED.
  17. Owl
    Owl 28 August 2011 14: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Epaulettes are understandable for those who wore epaulets on their shoulders or wears them. Shoulder straps - good!
  18. mitrich
    mitrich 3 September 2011 18: 16 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Listen, m-d-d-a-c (I refer to a man)! Did I take your wife from you? What are you putting down cons all the time? I do not agree with what - write, or you’re dirty like a small asshole.
    I already understood who you are, this analysis is for a first grader.
  19. Comrade
    Comrade 5 September 2011 00: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I believe that the titles should be left, but not for the "correctness" of the comment, but for the number of comments and articles, to highlight the "old-timers" of the forum, to conduct a monthly poll for the best author of articles and posts ... It is not necessary for a person to come here only with aim to get a higher rank .....
    I propose to sacrifice a vote for the post for the sake of pluralism of opinions .... No one should feel pressure for their beliefs ..... often really useful comments strongly obscure the view from a different angle ....
    It is necessary to achieve honesty, openness, respect for others' opinions from people .... let it be better for a person to justify reasonably why he does not agree with this or that post, than simply minuses ....

    Thus, I suggest:
    1. Remove the vote - useful or not comment.
    2. Leave the title for the number of comments and articles.
    3. Remove the negative rating - let no one be afraid to speak out and freely express their opinion, and those who disagree with him will correctly justify their opinion and do not infect a person anywhere ...
    4. Monthly to conduct a survey on the best author of articles and commentator and give them the next rank, regardless of all other indicators .... and according to the results of the annual survey, to give the best according to the results of the year immediately, for example, Major General - the authority of this person will be doubtless ...
    5. In no case do not introduce any medals - everything should be ascetic, as in the army .... enough shoulder straps ...

    So, in my opinion, the chasers will be cut off and the site will become even more interesting, and opinions - versatile ....
  20. CARTRIDGE
    CARTRIDGE 5 September 2011 12: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I think I don’t need to make any changes! For me, the accounting system is ideal in its current form (maybe I'm not creative). Judging by the comments, you can understand that who says the most that status needs to be removed, that it encourages people to write incorrect comments (this is Figvam, SuperDuke and Mitrich) are just those people who are already close to the highest rank and they have nowhere to go (no offense, just an assumption) It is correctly said that the user rating is highly dependent on voting and for writing articles, I do not see any minuses, everything is correct. I for example, an unregistered user came here more often than now. And the content of a written comment depends on a given topic and a person’s knowledge about it, or on mood, and not on the pursuit of asterisks winked
    I hope you vote for this post (+) Joke :)
  21. Glenn witcher 26 October 2011 00: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Good general idea, combine karma and user statuses.
    But I would like to see how many points correspond to what rank.