Korean People's Army. Anti-tank weapons

50 165 19
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    23 October 2014 09: 22
    Given the "openness" of North Korea, a very interesting selection.
  2. +8
    23 October 2014 09: 59
    If this is SPT, then how did they solve the problem of gas contamination in the fighting compartment? Lack of roof or barrel blowing? Otherwise, it will be very, very "hard" to conduct intensive fire.
    1. +2
      23 October 2014 10: 39
      Otherwise, it will be very, very "hard" to conduct intensive fire.


      They keep reserve combat crews
      1. 0
        23 October 2014 11: 23
        Quote: Maki Avellievich
        They keep reserve combat crews

        It's sarcasm? Or is this really the case?
        1. 0
          23 October 2014 21: 41
          It's sarcasm? Or is this really the case?


          Unfortunately, I think this is both.
  3. +1
    23 October 2014 10: 06
    Some sort of stone in their bosom they still have, I think so.
  4. +4
    23 October 2014 11: 08
    Amazing, bravo!
  5. Nikolav
    + 10
    23 October 2014 11: 25
    The author shoveled a lot of material to make this interesting collection. Thanks for the work!
  6. +2
    23 October 2014 12: 40
    I do not quite agree that in the photo of the tank destroyer, it seems to me that this is just a self-propelled gun.
    And in the above photo, not the latest Korean tank, the newest one here (they can be easily distinguished by the location of the driver mechanic on the newest one, it sits in the middle):
  7. +3
    23 October 2014 12: 45
    Here is his larger photo (option without remote sensing):
  8. -7
    23 October 2014 14: 09
    Thanks to the author, but how are they going to fight on this, horror, for some reason I was of a better opinion about the DPRK army, which missiles, where they will fly, if the current is destroyed by self-blowing the enemy
  9. +5
    23 October 2014 14: 54
    Here is another photo of this unit, all the same, this is an analogue of our ACS Acacia:
  10. +4
    23 October 2014 15: 54
    Thanks to the author for the work done !!!
  11. +3
    23 October 2014 17: 36
    MD-500 with Baby:


    And a photo of the previous new tank with DZ:

  12. +3
    23 October 2014 18: 26
    Wah, I didn’t know that the DPRK has Hughes ...
    Indeed there is.

    Quote:
    ...The presence of these machines in the armed forces of the DPRK has long been known, but a public demonstration of these helicopters took place only now. In 1984-1985, the DPRK secretly purchased a total of 87 light helicopters produced by the American company Hughes Helicopters - one Hughes 300C, 20 Hughes 369D and 66 Hughes 369E (now the rights to the last two models belong to the company MD Helicopters, and the helicopters themselves are designated, respectively, as MD 500D and MD 500E). The purchase was made through the West German company Delta-Avia Fluggeräte GmbH, which acted as a distributor of Hughes Helicopters in Germany and Western Europe. The helicopters were shipped in five batches by sea from Los Angeles to Antwerp, and then transported through Dutch territory to Rotterdam, where they were loaded onto Soviet ships that delivered them to the DPRK. Kurt Behrens, head of Delta-Avia Fluggeräte GmbH, directly supervised the purchase of helicopters in the interests of the DPRK, and customers from Spain, Portugal, Nigeria and Japan appeared in the documents as fictitious final recipients. The first batch of helicopters was delivered to the DPRK in November 1984. In 1985, further deliveries were stopped by the American authorities.

    Most of the received Hughes 369E helicopters were equipped in the DPRK with four launchers of copies of the Soviet Malyutka ATGM, which are clearly visible on the helicopters in the photographs and footage of the military parade on July 27, 2013 ...
    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/580638.html

    ....................

    Thanks for the article, Roman!
    Curious info.
    drinks

    Photo: Hughes 369E (MD 500E) in Pyongyang.
  13. 0
    23 October 2014 19: 53
    Ordinary outdated Soviet rubbish, for the most part.
    The DPRK is held only by the PRC behind its back and the lack of useful resources in itself.
  14. 0
    23 October 2014 22: 54
    Why keep the first PRUS. They have a "shelf life".

    What is the hole in the Iranian complex? To create a cumulative jet?

    152 mm howitzer anti-tank guns? They have different ballistics.
  15. +2
    24 October 2014 05: 07
    The tank destroyer with an 103-mm gun was also made according to this scheme.

    New North Korean caliber? what
  16. 0
    30 October 2014 15: 45
    which country is such a weapon that they can produce it.