Military Review
Sign In Register

Russia offers Ukraine to compensate for the supply of electricity to the Crimea

32
The Minister of Fuel and Energy of the Republic of Crimea, Sergey Egorov, said that the Ukrainian and Russian ministers of energy had begun negotiations on a proposal from the Russian Federation providing for additional supplies of electricity to Ukraine in order to rule out a reduction in supplies to Crimea.

Russia offers Ukraine to compensate for the supply of electricity to the Crimea


According to the minister, at the moment the volume of deliveries has decreased to 70% of the power level that was supplied earlier. However, this did not affect the energy supply of the Crimea, as the level of consumed electrical power also decreased.
"It's true. This is only part of the negotiations on energy issues, which in the complex affect both gas negotiations, and the supply of oil, coal and electricity, ”the RIA quoted Yegorov as saying. "News".

The Minister noted that negotiations are ongoing, so the results may appear in the near future.

It should be noted that 49 billion rubles are allocated for the development of the Crimea and its energy independence from Ukraine within the framework of the federal target program “Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol to 2020 of the Year”.

At the moment, Crimea depends on the supply of electricity from Ukraine to 70%. The program of its energy security provides for the construction of power lines from the Krasnodar Territory, as well as the development of its own generation.
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
32 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 9 October 2014 11: 50
    +16
    Well, finally, from "hurray with our hats," we moved into the sphere of practical events. The people of Crimea have always considered themselves a part of Russia and have done a lot to reunite, and now they are ready to endure these petty "dirty tricks" from Ukraine. Now great Russia also needs to prove, first of all to itself, what it is capable of. The return of Crimea is the first, but not the last step towards the restoration of Russia's greatness
    1. USSR 1971
      USSR 1971 9 October 2014 12: 39
      +1
      That's right, Russia still has a lot to do to make Crimea one of the best regions of Russia. Not so much even to spite the National Guard, but for the benefit of people who decided their fate and the fate of their children for many years to come, without regard to the asylum of the Kiev authorities.
    2. atalef
      atalef 9 October 2014 13: 41
      +4
      According to the minister, at the moment the volume of deliveries has decreased to 70% of the power level that was supplied earlier. However, this did not affect the energy supply of the Crimea, as the level of consumed electrical power also decreased.

      Why is consumption reduced by 30%?
      Is the industry worth it?
      1. Serg 122
        Serg 122 9 October 2014 16: 41
        +2
        Latest good news from Crimea!
        Attorney General of the Republic of Crimea Natalya Poklonskaya appeared today at a meeting of the State Council of the Republic, which elected Sergei Aksyonov as the head of the region, with a new hair color and a new hairstyle. Now the Crime Prosecutor General is a brunette. This was reported by the newspaper "Vesti".

        Original article: http://russian.rt.com/article/53619#ixzz3FeQLaKSw
  2. Abbra
    Abbra 9 October 2014 11: 51
    +5
    I am touched by the position of Ukraine. On the one hand, they scream that Crimea is theirs. And on the other, are they negotiating to get money from Russia for energy supply to THEIR Crimea? Well, what do you call it?
    1. ISKANDER25
      ISKANDER25 9 October 2014 11: 53
      +8
      Hello! This means one-recognized Crimea Russian!
      1. kolyhalovs
        kolyhalovs 9 October 2014 12: 02
        0
        They recognized it as Russian when the first polite "volunteers" appeared in Crimea. Otherwise, the war in Ukraine would have started earlier. In general, I am touched by all the screams of the ukropatriots about "aggression" in the Crimea after they just pro-given this Crimea.
        1. Cristall
          Cristall 9 October 2014 12: 21
          -24
          Quote: kolyhalovs
          In general, I am touched by all the screams of the ukropatriots about "aggression" in the Crimea after they just pro-given this Crimea.

          Well, they could drown everything in the blood ..
          In general, it’s the position of the fleet's squeeze and the assets of the army and navy of Ukraine that personally infuriates me. By what right was the fleet blocked, the army of Ukraine? This is the first.
          Secondly, it’s even more important now - by what right are property and ships not returned to Ukraine?
          Crimea itself decided to be Russian — its will. But blocking the fleet and army is not an internationally recognized act. And confiscation .. well, I'm sorry - it means aggression.
          And thirdly, Russia's position unilaterally terminated all agreements with Ukraine and even demanded an indemnity with reparation ... thank you.
          Without touching on the topic of the transition of the Crimea - the Russian Federation behaved like a petty thief. It is not the return of the fleet and property (in full) and the termination of contracts that is an indisputable fact of the so-called. "aggression" for me personally.
          Well, here's a bunch of comments about the "trophies" - they themselves admit that there was a war.
          So far, the Russian Federation is behaving this way - such is the attitude towards it.
          In general, it was well conceived but executed in the final was disgusting. As if the Russian Federation needed those remnants of the fleet? Rusty property? Property of Ukrainian business?
          It could well be agreed ... And breaks in the contracts could normally sit down and formalize both sides.
          And so "urakrymnash" and no one decides to us - they all tore everything up ... and then - this is why the Ukrainians consider us enemies ... for a long time probably ... it's in their blood ..
          1. Gecko
            Gecko 9 October 2014 13: 15
            +14
            You read better how Ukraine behaved in the 90s in the Crimea and in Odessa in relation to the Russian fleet, in Odessa the ousting of the headquarters of the fleet swept and what barbaric methods failed in the Crimea. No need to yell that Ukraine was deprived of virginity, you dig deeper, she is still a whore.
            1. Nevsky_ZU
              Nevsky_ZU 9 October 2014 13: 53
              +4
              Cristall

              Just not long ago, I drew your attention that your comments and thoughts become right. You don’t even notice how you leave the centrist position. Zombany for an hour ?! How did you push up the fleet and its infrastructure in the 1991 year in Crimea and Odessa to tell? It is easy to refuse an industrial worldview, an industrial creator and join the farm-peasant consumption, but it’s hard to come back ... Have you already bought an embroidery? The mentality of the Western sawmill will soon begin to dominate in Ukraine, sadly. This is a clip, I give such as Cristal, to lost, Russian-speaking souls:

              1. decanter
                decanter 9 October 2014 17: 39
                +2
                You can also tell how Ukraine squeezed out apartments at the beginning of 90 with a bunch of people .. in particular, our family as we worked under a contract in the Tyumen region, and when we wanted to return, it turns out we are not citizens and we don’t have a pension for parents and it’s impossible to privatize ....
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. g1v2
            g1v2 9 October 2014 13: 59
            +2
            Come on honestly. Although our troops do not fight, Ukraine has been a hostile state for the past 20 years, which means that any actions against it are justified. Of course, they will give all the junk to you, although the Republic of Crimea nationalized all state property of Ukraine on its territory, which means the fleet. But the ships, with the exception of a couple, will be returned to you, but I do not advise you to rejoice. This is such a revenge on GDP for 23 years of blackmail by Ukraine by the Black Sea Fleet, when it knocked out money and discounts from us threatening to evict the Black Sea Fleet in unprepared Novorossiysk, which would put an end to it like at a trading port. Now all this iron clutters the port of Odessa and has no value, it only eats money, which the Navy has so little. Well, you have to make a choice - either occupy the commercial berths of Odessa or build a military port in Nikolaev, and there is no money for it. Yes, and the ships themselves are easier to finish so as not to be tormented, hundreds of millions of euros that Ukraine does not have to spend on putting them in order. I think that Ukraine doesn’t really want to return the entire amount of trash, and it has nowhere to return to it. Yes, and these ships do not have combat value, but Ukraine cannot afford to write off most of the fleet out of pride. Ach tormented, the rest will bring junk later.
          5. Fedyl
            Fedyl 9 October 2014 14: 01
            +1
            weapons and equipment began to be returned, and as the genocide began, they stopped. Correctly done !!! well, and if you are a nice person so smart, count how many were ruined due to their fault + how much they owe for gas + killed Russians, etc., etc. And the lackeys of the West are considered enemies, and not those who have relatives throughout the USSR !!! The information war is well developed!
            Advice !!! Do not wake the bear !!!
          6. alexandrovich
            alexandrovich 9 October 2014 15: 39
            +1
            And when dill disconnected from Russia in the 90s, why didn’t they return the property? For them, this means in the order of things, and Russia means it has depressed yes !? She took her, but not everything, she will take the rest later! hi
          7. boomerang.
            boomerang. 9 October 2014 23: 12
            +1
            Secondly, it’s even more important now - by what right are property and ships not returned to Ukraine?

            Actually / I think that the inhabitants of the Crimea also own military property. I do not think it fair that everything should belong to Ukraine, even 17 thousand troops remained to serve in the Crimea. And Russia cannot give everything at once, as new weapons arrive, it will give the old to Ukraine, but the military cannot remain completely without weapons.

            I worked in Crimea for 30 years, paid taxes. Someone receives my pension in Ukraine, in Germany they do not pay me Ukrainian pension. I saved up 36 thousand rubles to buy a house, but in 1991 the state simply stole them from me and no one paid me compensation and I probably will never get it, although maybe Russia will return something, the money was in the savings bank of Crimea.
        2. Nikolaev5
          Nikolaev5 9 October 2014 12: 23
          -13
          And who could have foreseen such impudence of the "elder brother"?
      2. asadov
        asadov 9 October 2014 12: 23
        -2
        and who said that the first started dill? most likely this proposal came from ours.
        The proposal is sound but dill will try to squeeze a lot of us out of it.
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 9 October 2014 11: 54
      0
      Something reasonable in Ukraine’s behavior should someday appear.
    3. svp67
      svp67 9 October 2014 12: 00
      +3
      Quote: Abbra
      And on the other, are they negotiating to get money from Russia for energy supply to THEIR Crimea? Well, what do you call it?
      How how ... HACKING ...
  3. rasputin17
    rasputin17 9 October 2014 11: 52
    +4
    Yes, only for one debt for gas you can buy the entire dill energy system in this region !!!!
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 9 October 2014 11: 52
    +2
    Crimean energy independence is the cornerstone of the development of this enclave. Our power engineers will cope with this task. And after the construction of the bridge is completed, it will no longer be an enclave.
  5. Nevsky_ZU
    Nevsky_ZU 9 October 2014 11: 59
    +4
    Eh ... it is necessary to prolong the Russophobic regime in Ukraine with energy supplies. Crimea cannot be abandoned with a kerosene lamp sad I was afraid of that, a double-edged sword .. what
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 9 October 2014 12: 10
    0
    The program of its energy security provides for the construction of power lines from the Krasnodar Territory, as well as the development of its own generation.

    Provided? It was already necessary to start building in the spring. And from the Crimea, the employment of the population and in the Krasnodar Territory are new jobs. And most importantly - in the future, energy independence from the ukropiya.
  7. saag
    saag 9 October 2014 12: 16
    0
    "... According to the minister, at the moment the volume of supplies has decreased to 70% of the capacity level that was supplied earlier. However, this did not affect the energy supply of Crimea."

    Sorry, what if they are going to compensate?
  8. provincial
    provincial 9 October 2014 12: 24
    0
    Strange, but I wrote about this at a time when Hohland was shutting off the water for the Crimea. Have our leaders been so careless or are they ... ...... Crimea and many are not happy to return Crimea and are doing everything to cause discontent among Crimeans?
  9. ferdiperdozzz
    ferdiperdozzz 9 October 2014 12: 58
    0
    And what prevents to fit any nuclear ship to Sevastopol for example?
    1. massad1
      massad1 9 October 2014 13: 43
      0
      Montreux convention unfortunately
      1. ferdiperdozzz
        ferdiperdozzz 9 October 2014 13: 58
        +1
        Subject to prior notice by the Turkish authorities Black Sea Powers can navigate their warships through the straits in peacetime any class.
  10. captain
    captain 9 October 2014 13: 04
    0
    Even at the beginning of the conflict, it was possible to agree to write off part of gas debts from Ukraine, due to the use of water from the Kherson canal and electricity. It’s just that someone did not think through everything to the end.
  11. Old Man Leader
    Old Man Leader 9 October 2014 13: 04
    0
    MOSCOW, October 9 - RIA Novosti. Moscow does not comment on statements by the future head of EU diplomacy, Federica Mogherini, who previously criticized the project for the construction of the Kerch Bridge, which will connect Crimea to the rest of the Russian Federation.

    On Monday, according to media reports, the candidate for the post of head of the EU diplomacy Federica Mogherini said that the EU should not allow the construction of a land transport passage through the Kerch Strait.

    "I would suggest to wait until this lady starts function in his official capacity "- Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation, Yuri Ushakov, told reporters in response to a request to comment on such statements, said on Thursday.
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 9 October 2014 13: 13
      0
      Quote: Old Man Leader
      I would suggest waiting until this lady begins to function in her official capacity

      Shoulder prostitute of the 6th category? what
  12. provincial
    provincial 9 October 2014 13: 12
    0
    "The candidate for the post of the head of EU diplomacy Federica Mogherini said that the EU should not allow the construction of a land transport crossing through the Kerch Strait." I wonder how the EU will not allow this?
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 9 October 2014 13: 52
      0
      Everything is simple. They supply energy to the Crimea, and we give them (like barter). Only they can ask for a price much lower than the market price, well, and, most likely, they will stick a gas theme here ...
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. region46
    region46 9 October 2014 13: 38
    0
    Quote: Cristall
    Quote: kolyhalovs
    In general, I am touched by all the screams of the ukropatriots about "aggression" in the Crimea after they just pro-given this Crimea.

    Well, they could drown everything in the blood ..
    In general, it’s the position of the fleet's squeeze and the assets of the army and navy of Ukraine that personally infuriates me. By what right was the fleet blocked, the army of Ukraine? This is the first.
    Secondly, it’s even more important now - by what right are property and ships not returned to Ukraine?
    Crimea itself decided to be Russian — its will. But blocking the fleet and army is not an internationally recognized act. And confiscation .. well, I'm sorry - it means aggression.
    And thirdly, Russia's position unilaterally terminated all agreements with Ukraine and even demanded an indemnity with reparation ... thank you.
    Without touching on the topic of the transition of the Crimea - the Russian Federation behaved like a petty thief. It is not the return of the fleet and property (in full) and the termination of contracts that is an indisputable fact of the so-called. "aggression" for me personally.
    Well, here's a bunch of comments about the "trophies" - they themselves admit that there was a war.
    So far, the Russian Federation is behaving this way - such is the attitude towards it.
    In general, it was well conceived but executed in the final was disgusting. As if the Russian Federation needed those remnants of the fleet? Rusty property? Property of Ukrainian business?
    It could well be agreed ... And breaks in the contracts could normally sit down and formalize both sides.
    And so "urakrymnash" and no one decides to us - they all tore everything up ... and then - this is why the Ukrainians consider us enemies ... for a long time probably ... it's in their blood ..

    Listen, friend, would you go to the Censor. no
    although judging by your comments you are not my friend at all, but ..... !!!!!
  16. Semen Semyonitch
    Semen Semyonitch 9 October 2014 13: 44
    0
    I wonder what price Kiev will break (for sure it will be linked to gas) ...
    1. Fedyl
      Fedyl 9 October 2014 13: 56
      0
      don't go to grandma
  17. fridge
    fridge 9 October 2014 14: 14
    0
    All ukromir can not be heated, all trade relations, only prepayment. Nothing inspires confidence in a client like prepayment.
  18. kagorta
    kagorta 9 October 2014 15: 25
    0
    I propose to start banning with no respect for our president.
  19. Siberian
    Siberian 9 October 2014 17: 42
    0
    .... As they say, a vivid example of when bargaining is appropriate .........
  20. olegkrava
    olegkrava 9 October 2014 17: 47
    0
    Quote: Serg 122
    Latest good news from Crimea!
    Attorney General of the Republic of Crimea Natalya Poklonskaya appeared today at a meeting of the State Council of the Republic, which elected Sergei Aksyonov as the head of the region, with a new hair color and a new hairstyle. Now the Crime Prosecutor General is a brunette. This was reported by the newspaper "Vesti".

    Original article: http://russian.rt.com/article/53619#ixzz3FeQLaKSw

    And yet, how beautiful our law is.
  21. krez71
    krez71 9 October 2014 18: 27
    0
    Why send it directly to the Censor? The interlocutor has a different opinion - you need to argue and convince.
  22. Analgin
    Analgin 9 October 2014 18: 31
    0
    Quote: Semyon Semyonich
    I wonder what price Kiev will break (for sure it will be linked to gas) ...

    It all depends on who, after the lustration and the upcoming elections, will rule the country. If the radicals are bad, these can go for principle. In general, one must be prepared for any development of events, Crimea is still too dependent on Ukraine, so the threat of turning "krymnash" into "namkrysh" is quite real (especially in view of the approaching winter).
  23. kind
    kind 9 October 2014 19: 32
    0
    They wanted to build a nuclear power plant at Kazantip. Maybe you can still? !!