Decker's Pocket Revolver

17
In 1912, the inventor from Germany, V. Decker (W. Decker) from the small town of Zella St. Blazien received a patent for a small pocket revolver of the 6,35 caliber mm. Developed by Dekker revolver designed to solve the problems of self-defense. Dekker's revolver was distinguished by its original design and design, while possessing a simple and reliable mechanism of operation. Perhaps Dekker's revolver would have had a good future if it had not been for the First World War that had begun in 1914. It prevented its mass production.

For quite a long time, the existence of various manual firearms weapons a huge number of samples and models were created. Many of these means of destroying their own kind were, to put it mildly, unusual. Some ideas of designers were so successful that they are still used, while other ideas, although they had obvious advantages, remained less popular or completely forgotten. Many samples of small arms remained forever only in the form of experimental samples or models that were released in minimal quantities and now represent a tasty morsel for private small arms collectors and museums of the world.

One of such samples is Decker's pocket-sized revolver, created on the threshold of the First World War. Six-compact compact revolver was equipped with solid steel frame. In the front plate was drilled channel for the axis of the drum. In the upper strap there was a groove for the rear sight. On the left side is a groove for loading the drum. The barrel of the revolver is steel, screwed into the frame, faceted in cross section, and has a solid milling front sight. The drum is cylindrical, also steel, it has 6 charging chambers and a central hole for its axis.

Decker's Pocket Revolver


The revolver was equipped with a dead-end trigger mechanism, which allowed firing only by the self-intake. To the trigger of a revolver, a sufficiently long trigger lever was attached, which passed under a six-drum reel. At the moment when the shooter pressed the trigger, the lever moved back, and the drum dog lifted upward, ensuring the drum was rotated one step. At that moment, when the drum was fixed in the firing position, the trigger lever cocked and then the drummer lowered.

From the possibility of accidentally firing the arrow protected the mechanical fuse. The fuse box was located on the left side of the revolver. When it was turned on, it would block the triggering thrust. The shooter charged Decker's pocket-sized revolver through a special door that was located on the left side of the frame. Through the same door with the help of a ramrod-ejector, which was located inside the hollow axis of the drum, the spent cartridges were extracted.

On the right side of the frame of the revolver there was a special thin metal shield with a rectangular cutout in its upper part. This shield served important functions: it kept the cartridges in the drum, and also served as a protection against the rotating drum for the index finger arrow. It was the flap that gave Decker's revolver a more streamlined shape. It was quite important, as it provided quick and easy removal of weapons from the pocket.



The revolver was equipped with open unregulated sights, which consisted of a pillar in the form of a longitudinal groove on the upper surface of the frame and a semicircular front sight. Fake cheeks on the handle had a small notch and were made of plastic. At the same time, they were marked in the form of the name of the revolver “Decker”, the number of the patent issued to the weapon “DRP 253148” could also be affixed. On the upper surface of the frame, the patent number of the weapon was also put, as well as its caliber - the inscription “CALIBER 6.35”.

One of the features of the revolver was extremely low weight. Without ammunition, this sample of small arms of the beginning of the century weighed just 225 grams, which can be considered a kind of record. The length of its barrel was only 50 mm, and the total length of the revolver was equal to 118 mm. Despite its small size, the weapon was completely made of steel, no cases of destruction of the revolver in the process of shooting were recorded. Such modest dimensions made the weapon a toy rather than a combat pistol. It could not be considered a good means of self-defense, despite the simplicity of the design and its reliability. His ammunition was weak and was characterized by low lethal force.

In principle, on the basis of this model in the future it would be possible to create a more sophisticated revolver with new ammunition and larger dimensions, but this did not happen. The reason was not the growing popularity of shop pistols, but the unleashing of the First World War, in which such weak civilian weapons simply could not find a place. Indeed, this gun had very modest characteristics and efficiency. Because of this, just before the war, only a very limited number of these revolvers were released.



Mass production began immediately before the start of World War I, and already in 1914, it was stopped. In addition to Germany, a number of Dekker's revolvers were manufactured in the UK, where they were assembled by RH Mueller of London, which produced revolvers under the Mueller Special Revolver brand. At the same time, up to now, not a single English-style Decker revolver has been preserved. Most likely, in the UK, their units were collected. A small series of revolvers produced made this weapon a rare visitor to museum collections and private weapon collections.

Performance characteristics of Dekker's revolver:
Caliber - 6,35 mm.
Used cartridge - Browning 6,35-mm.
Overall length - 118 mm.
Barrel length - 50 mm.
Drum capacity - 6 cartridges.
Mass revolver without cartridges - 225 g.

Information sources:
http://gunsite.narod.ru/decker.htm
http://weaponland.ru/load/revolver_decker/147-1-0-887
http://www.fastmarksman.ru/D.htm
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    9 October 2014 10: 18
    An interesting gadget, but the visibility is rather weak - you need more photos (more views are good and different). However, thanks to the author for the review. soldier
    1. +1
      9 October 2014 16: 21
      Quote: miv110
      An interesting gadget, but the visibility is rather weak - you need more photos (more views are good and different). However, thanks to the author for the review.


      There are very few weapons photos in my collection, but I liked this revolver, that's why I kept it at home. Hold on. hi



      1. 0
        9 October 2014 17: 48
        Thank you very much for the photo on the right, dear Karlsonn. Apparently you have a good collection)
        1. +1
          9 October 2014 18: 18
          Quote: Pazifist87
          Thank you very much for the photo on the right, dear Karlsonn.


          Always happy to help. hi

          Quote: Pazifist87
          Apparently you have a good collection)


          I love the photo. feel Especially military history.

          B-17 bomber that fell under the "friendly" bombs over Berlin.
          clickable.
          1. +1
            9 October 2014 20: 55
            Beautiful ... I saw a video from the B-24, where it is above the Pacific Ocean in a similar situation, they hit a center plane with a bomb ... And this is the first time)
  2. 0
    9 October 2014 10: 44
    With self-cocking, the descent is tight, and with that weight you could get out of it? And why fly, anyway you can’t get any further than 5.
    1. +1
      9 October 2014 10: 54
      This is a weapon of self-defense. For him, the accuracy of the battle is not particularly important. Rather, the psychological effect of the shot. The descent during self-cocking is tighter, but the balance and the convenience of holding the weapon are still very important.
    2. 0
      10 October 2014 19: 30
      Quote: Grigorievich
      With self-cocking, the descent is tight, and with that weight, where could one get from?

      This weapon for shooting is almost point blank, like all pocket and vest revolvers and pistols. They were not intended for targeted shooting. The fly, in principle, is not needed here, it is only a tribute to fashion, a design feature. Still, a weapon without a front sight does not look quite aesthetically pleasing.
  3. +1
    9 October 2014 10: 50
    It's a pity there is no photo on the right side. And so an interesting weapon of self-defense, relevant at that time. It’s a pity they didn’t do it under a more powerful cartridge ...
  4. +2
    9 October 2014 10: 59
    An ordinary example of a family known as "Velodogi". The desire to have at least some kind of weapon.
  5. dipqrer
    +1
    9 October 2014 12: 09
    The advantage is low cost compared to Browning m1906.
  6. ramsi
    +1
    9 October 2014 12: 57
    a firearm of such a plan is probably best in the brass knuckles form factor
  7. +1
    9 October 2014 13: 03
    225g is not bad for a weapon of last chance.
  8. +2
    9 October 2014 20: 12
    For that time, a "fairy tale" for self-defense, especially for women.
  9. 0
    9 October 2014 21: 31
    I can’t understand why WHY everyone admires Leon Nagan’s product? How many outstanding gunsmiths were who were TALENTED of the Nagans. What's new in their revolver? Obturation? Well, this is only a detriment to the accuracy of the shot — while you are pushing the trigger, the sight will come together. Recharge? Yeah, I’ll willingly believe when you show me HOW TO RELEASE NAGAN within 10 (ten) seconds. I still can’t understand what guided the then officials when adopting weapons that obviously worsened the combat effectiveness (defense) of a soldier.
    Take even this revolver. Yes, a little ugly, but more functional, more convenient to recharge, the caliber is quite serious. What else is needed? If wrong, refute. I agree even to the cons :)))
    1. +1
      10 October 2014 19: 37
      Quote: kirpich
      Yeah, I’ll willingly believe when you show me HOW TO RELEASE NAGAN within 10 (ten) seconds.

      There was "Nagant 1910", a purely Belgian assembly, with a drum swinging to the right and simultaneous extraction of the casings. It was used in the Civil War in Russia, as it was partially supplied to the Wrangel army. Officially, it was not in service anywhere.
      Quote: kirpich
      I still can not understand what guided the then officials when adopting weapons

      Do not bother with such a question. Lobbyists have always been.
      Quote: kirpich
      Take even this revolver. Yes, slightly ugly, but more functional, more convenient to recharge, the caliber is quite serious

      You wrote it in vain. The "Nagant" and this revolver have different purposes. An army-police model is one thing, a pocket-sized self-defense weapon is another. It makes no sense to compare revolvers designed for different tasks. And not only revolvers. It's like comparing a minicar and a bus.
      Obturation? Well, this is only a detriment to the accuracy of the shot — while you are pushing the trigger, the sight will come together.

      You are right, but consider the low level of technology in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. It was necessary to produce a revolver at home. The exact fit of the drum to the breech section of the barrel required a high production culture and good equipment. The problem was solved by the fact that the obturation was provided purely constructively, in the presence of any technology.
      1. 0
        10 October 2014 21: 40
        The main weapon of a soldier is a rifle, not a revolver. The officers received the revolvers, to shoot from such a farther than 20m without sufficient practice is like a white light. Decided to 10-15, and so it will do.
        1. 0
          11 October 2014 12: 45
          There were two types of revolvers. They were distinguished by "Officer" and "Soldier". The soldier had no self-platoon.
          1. 0
            11 October 2014 22: 20
            Quote: kirpich
            The soldier lacked self-platoon.

            He was still distinguished by purely external details.
            If desired, it could be made self-cocking. There would be a tool.
            The non-self-platoon "Nagan" was produced in Soviet times. I don’t know how much. But there were definitely such samples.
  10. 0
    2 November 2014 15: 39
    a good machine for self-defense. I think it’s convenient and reliable.