Military Review

Mikhalkov: I do not understand why Makarevich lives in Russia

54
Nikita Mikhalkov is sure that his new picture “Sunstroke”, which will be released in the world hire on October 9, will not be shown in Ukraine. The director believes that his position on the conflict in the south-east makes him persona non grata.



“The politicization of society and reckless control that turns into genocide, both artistic and human, will not allow them to show this picture to them,” says the director. “But its Ukrainian viewers need not just watch!” Watch it as an antibiotic! She tells what happened to them. She warns us what can happen if we do not think! This message is very important, especially for me personally. If he is understood, I will be happy, the Russian director said.

Would you like to challenge this in court?

- I could go to court if my painting was stolen from me, and so - this is a voluntary matter. We offer to buy a picture, and they say - "No, we will not buy it." Well, it is not necessary! Why is there a court? If they secretly roll it without receiving permission from us, there will be a court.

Have you gotten worse relations with your Ukrainian colleagues because of the political situation?

- The fact is that the eclipse has touched everyone. You understand that restaurants still work in Kiev, people gather there. Life goes on - this is the worst thing. You understand that it is scary when our human rights activists hold the Peace March against the war in Ukraine, although they were silent all the time when they killed the Golden Eagle and burned people in Odessa. They were silent when there were “Colorado” and fried bugs. They did not protect anyone! They protect today, when the alignment is already clear. I think it is unhealthy. If you are a single country - it is impossible that foie gras, oysters, parmesan, cucumbers, lard and horilka continue to exist in normal human life. And in 500 - 600 kilometers from this life people die. I shot so much in Ukraine, I have many friends there. One Milikaru is a deceased, ingenious cameraman; I took three pictures with him. They can not be stopped by persuasion - they must be cured, it is a virus.

What about relationships with the international film community? Your brother, Andrei Konchalovsky, refused the Oscar award. Did he make this decision himself or did he consult with you?

- Absolutely not! He himself shot a wonderful picture “White Nights of Alexey Tryapitsyn”. I am very happy for him! He sent me the already sent letter, where he rightly says that the value of the Oscar for the world subsides. For Americans, the prize matters - it's money. They receive additional subsidies and support.

What did you reply to this letter? Supported?

- Of course! First, this is my elder brother, and in our family there has always been a cult of an elder brother. Even when I disagree with him, I say that I did not agree, but there are many “but” ...

Some began to accuse you of public relations before the premiere, when you began to publicly clarify relations with Makarevich in your program on the federal channel.

- This is stupid. I find it difficult to respond to nonsense. And if there were no pictures? You know, so far I don’t need to draw attention to my picture in such a difficult way. As for Makarevich: if you say that you are speaking before everyone, then why do you refuse to speak before the militiamen, saying, they say, “I don’t sympathize with them”? Now the burial sites of 400 people are already opened, they have been shot and sand-filled without trial. If you say that you spoke in front of children, then I will give an example: Klavdiya Shulzhenko came to speak in occupied Kiev in front of children, not in front of the Nazis, but in front of children. It is difficult to imagine that she speaks to children when portraits of Hitler and the swastika are around.

What do you think, why and why Makarevich did it?

- I dont know. I think that this is not PR. I want to believe that this is a mistake. If he thinks so, then we think differently. I expressed my opinion. Not only do I love his work, he is also the first person in my life from whom I got an autograph. He wrote on it - "the first person to whom I gave an autograph." He is an adult, why should I teach him? Everything, taken together, is deprived of the most important thing - the real sensation of truth. When Makarevich says that the Crimea is an annexation and we need to give it away, and only then we will be civilized people - this is bewilderment. I was funny to read it. If this is true, then why should he live in this country? What is the point?
Originator:
http://lifenews.ru/news/141979
54 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Anton Gavrilov
    Anton Gavrilov 4 October 2014 07: 39
    +19
    I don’t understand why Makarevich lives in Russia - as they say the rhetorical question.
    1. nvv
      nvv 4 October 2014 07: 44
      +4
      He already worked out the material, he is not needed there. And here he was left a whipping boy. The rest is more convenient to hide behind him.
      1. krasin
        krasin 4 October 2014 08: 14
        +19
        For Makarevich. Our archery is everywhere ripened! He is a singer, diver and cook, and he gets into politics. I am especially impressed by his mania to write letters, appeals to the president with instructions and advice.
        Well, what can I say, in his 6th ward or in his favorite geyropu.
        1. mist4
          mist4 4 October 2014 09: 07
          +9
          Formerly buffoons (actors) and prostitutes in Rome, for example, were not allowed to the forum, and later in Europe as well, but now they are in the front rows and they are holding their breath, they think that for example an athlete or a soldier is surely smart and will be a good politician. The fruits of ripening, TIME TO EAT.
        2. X Y Z
          X Y Z 4 October 2014 12: 38
          +4
          Letters with instructions for the president are not some incomprehensible, unexpected phenomenon, but the natural result of all Makarev's quests and throwings. I, unlike many admirers of Makarevich, have always treated the "master" himself with some irony and wariness. This does not apply to his songs, but rather to his desire to always position himself as a thinker, a person who sees an order of magnitude further and deeper than all other fellow citizens. It was serious and so striking that it was impossible not to notice. Naturally, over time, these complexes received their further development, the feeling of their genius intensified many times over and letters flowed to the Kremlin ...
      2. CALL.
        CALL. 4 October 2014 11: 00
        +15
        You understand that it is scary when our human rights activists hold the Peace March against the war in Ukraine, although they were silent all the time when he killed the "Golden Eagle" and burned people in Odessa.

    2. nlkozodaeva
      nlkozodaeva 4 October 2014 08: 03
      +6
      Because in the West he is NOBODY
    3. mist4
      mist4 4 October 2014 08: 56
      +1
      According to the article, it is clear that besogon is more worried about the fact that "they will not buy", and not that they will not watch his "message", the word most suitable for a Russian patriot (popurvans). And when there was a massacre in Chechnya that restaurants did not work?
      1. Kindof
        Kindof 4 October 2014 11: 55
        -3
        For whom - the war, and for whom - the sales market for "antibiotics"
        If you are a patriot, then put your "message" on the u-tube soon!
        Maybe you are still interesting by Ukrainians and they will watch your movie

        The "message" is directed rather to the authorities: buy propaganda material from me
    4. Civil
      Civil 4 October 2014 09: 16
      -5
      that Mikhalkov that Makar ... one field of berries, fu
      1. Shadowcat
        Shadowcat 4 October 2014 15: 09
        -3
        Nikita’s scent is better and she smells more than she smells and when to run across, only once you get dirty you’ll wash yourself off.
        1. Shadowcat
          Shadowcat 5 October 2014 00: 26
          +1
          haters will hate (c)

          I don’t understand how you can expose the NKVD and SMERSH employees in an absurd light. Yes, there were excesses (and who does not have them?)
          After all, it was they who restrained Nazi aggression from the first hours of the war, taking the very first and most terrible blow (for information, the Border Guards, as now, were then part of the NKVD Directorate).
          They opposed spies, provocateurs, terrorists.
          They cleaned our ranks from all trash for many years after the war (alas, where they did not finish it, alas)
          Thanks to their efforts, information about the enemy troops was supplied. We owe them success in the Nuclear Project in the same way as people like Khariton, Kurchatov, Zavenyagin (and many others).
          And many other achievements, the list of which is simply fraudulent but under HATE it is not visible.

          Yes, there were nits and scum among them that used their position. But let someone throw a stone at me who is holy or call an organization that has not gone too far and has not sheltered; I have never once snake on my chest

          And to expose them in such a way as Nikitka did, it’s the same as being likened to rain with a question about Leningrad.
      2. Vorlon
        Vorlon 5 October 2014 17: 18
        0
        Any questions to Mikhalkov! But do not compare Schuta with the Director (not a mistake, the selections are special). The jester used to entertain people, and then became interested in politics. The director has a different theme. The restoration of the monarchy. But with the kin, he’s great at it. According to this Director.
  2. tilovaykrisa
    tilovaykrisa 4 October 2014 07: 42
    +29
    I never loved Mikhalkov, but in this case I support his position.
    1. smel
      smel 4 October 2014 07: 56
      +13
      Quote: tilovaykrisa
      I never loved Mikhalkov, but in this case I support his position.

      I wanted to write the same words. I didn’t like it. But now, looking at his patriotism and readiness to defend the Russian idea, the opinion of him is changing radically. In the same way, only with the opposite value of the vector, does the attitude change towards some cultural figures, kindly treated by our powers that be
      1. alicante11
        alicante11 4 October 2014 10: 13
        +8
        I wanted to write the same words. I didn’t like it. But now, looking at his patriotism and readiness to defend the Russian idea, the opinion of him is changing radically.


        Forgive me, but what does patriotism have to do with it? Simply by itself, without the state feeder Mikhalkov does not mean anything. During the post-Soviet era, not a single normal picture. Yes, not only normal, but even commercially successful. And he wants to live on a grand scale, so he licks the hand of the authorities so that budget funding for his "great work" does not run out.
        And his attitude to the authorities, which raised him, speaks of his integrity and patriotism. If he now cut off budgetary funding and give him a couple of grants from the State Department, a talented picture will appear of how drunken Colorado people in their uashnki with barriers of Russian paratroopers behind their backs are raping Nenka.
        1. Vasia1
          Vasia1 4 October 2014 11: 00
          +5
          Don't be jealous, this is a bad feeling. As for creativity - each person has his own attitude to the paintings of N. Mikhalkov. Look at them carefully. Of course, among American and other creations with shooters and scarecrows, it is uncomfortable to watch Burnt by the sun -2, but I advise you not to lament about the "Maidans" in the heads of young people later.
          1. huut
            huut 4 October 2014 11: 10
            -2
            Quote: Vasia1
            uncomfortable to watch Burnt by the sun -2, and I advise not to lament the "Maidans" in the heads of young people later.

            How exactly did you print Mikhalkov! So that's where maidans are born - in his films)
            In Kharkov, by chance, there was no whiskered muzzle in the crowd that fell the monument? With a cake, I guess, I wanted to dunk)
          2. Kindof
            Kindof 4 October 2014 12: 01
            +3
            Nothing to envy ..
            Mikhalkov said that he and Makarevich only have different points of view in Crimea
            It is very complex and opaque ((

            Such films as Burnt by the Sun - like "The Great Truth About the Great War", were written on posters
            and form that ideological broth - which is in the head of the liberals
        2. Shadowcat
          Shadowcat 4 October 2014 15: 16
          0
          Exactly said! Although I do not agree that he had no good. It was - but under Mikhalkov-father (Stranger-Svoe, Barber), and after "I take off my hat." As a producer, he can still do nothing (or maybe the film just won't be released / won't receive funding?).
          I may be mistaken, but he spoke positively about our Maydanchik "swamp" in his time. Or waited? I honestly don't remember.

          The rest - Hands, feet and ears behind.
    2. nvv
      nvv 4 October 2014 07: 56
      -2
      Or maybe it’s more convenient to increase the rating? You see one position he has already become higher.
      Quote: tilovaykrisa
      I never loved Mikhalkov, but in this case I support his position.
      1. nvv
        nvv 4 October 2014 07: 57
        0
        One more........
        1. nvv
          nvv 4 October 2014 08: 22
          -2
          I want to add. An article to raise the rating of Mikhalkov. For what? He is a monarchist. Well and ...? Setting certain circles to make Putin a monarch.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ABV
      ABV 4 October 2014 14: 36
      +1
      Well, why in all the comments to different articles to push this video .... tired already. There are not stupid people on the forum "live", everyone knows how to press buttons and know that the VO site is not the only one in the world ...
  4. Sharky
    Sharky 4 October 2014 07: 42
    +6
    Mikhalkov’s latest films are not very impressive, but he thinks in the right direction.
    1. Letun
      Letun 4 October 2014 08: 40
      +1
      Quote: Sharky
      Recent films Mikhalkov is not very impressive.

      This is to say the least lol
  5. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 4 October 2014 07: 43
    +16
    This is generally the biggest mystery why people who hate their homeland live in it, if they could live elsewhere. Again, it's all about money! They will swear on everyone around and earn money on them. Full disgusting.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 4 October 2014 07: 49
      +8
      Quote: dchegrinec
      . Full disgusting.

      It’s just that he was never Russian and never will be.
  6. Pro100Igor
    Pro100Igor 4 October 2014 07: 45
    +10
    Cultural and well-mannered person. The elder brother's cul is just parenting. Here is a monument to Lenin in America. Why isn’t it demolished? Yes, because it's a story.
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 4 October 2014 08: 04
      +11
      Somehow in Italy in Rome, our correspondent saw a monument to Mussolini and was very surprised. I asked the Italians why this monument would not be demolished and received the answer that yes, Mussolini was a bad person, but this is OUR HISTORY!
      1. alicante11
        alicante11 4 October 2014 10: 34
        +1
        The correspondent wrote nonsense. The answer was like "the monument is protected by the state and there is a time limit for demolition." And the state knows what it is doing.
    2. Kindof
      Kindof 4 October 2014 12: 05
      +3
      And why should the States not love Lenin?
      Trotsky, on the other hand, was sheltered in Mexico, in some fashionable American film "Frida" he is presented as a very enlightened and cultured person, contra ..
  7. botsman80
    botsman80 4 October 2014 07: 45
    +5
    I could not stand Mikhalkov ... Now I respect.
  8. nablydatel
    nablydatel 4 October 2014 07: 49
    +2
    threw away all his songs. hi
    1. Revolver
      Revolver 4 October 2014 07: 53
      +6
      Quote: nablydatel
      threw away all his songs. hi

      And I have nothing to throw away, I never had Makakarevich’s songs.
    2. andj61
      andj61 4 October 2014 08: 18
      +4
      Songs are not only 6th. They were created by a very respected team, in which Makarevich played an important, but not a decisive role. And some songs were simply grabbed by Makarevich, their real authors from "Machine" (Alexander Kutikov, Evgeny Margulis, Pyotr Podgorodetsky, Andrei Derzhavin, etc.) at first they were indignant, and then they fell silent - we agreed, probably. It was back in the 90s. Even then, they said that the image of Makarushka strongly does not coincide with his real one, with his moral qualities.
      Now Makar, his actions, the position he expressed and actions are unpleasant to me. And the songs ... This is our story. In the film "Big Life" the song "Dark Mounds Are Sleeping" was sung by a negative character, but the song became truly popular. So the songs of "Time Machine" - despite the fact that Makarevich, not very respected by many, had a hand in their creation, these songs will still remain popular and beloved among the people.
  9. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 4 October 2014 07: 51
    +4
    Ninkina Sergeevich, I don’t understand this either! request Interview +
  10. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 4 October 2014 07: 53
    +7
    Why does Makarevich live in Russia? Yes, because in the West this is such a thing ... no one needs a damn thing, if a betrayer betrayed once, he would betray the second.
  11. azbukin77
    azbukin77 4 October 2014 07: 58
    +2
    I don’t like Mikhalkov, but he raised the topic correctly. There is no place in Russia for such shifters !!!
  12. zavesa01
    zavesa01 4 October 2014 07: 58
    +3
    Interestingly, his "Sunstroke" is the same as the previous ones. He's taking pictures for himself.
    But for his position of respect.
  13. lg41
    lg41 4 October 2014 07: 59
    +4
    Makarevich’s goal is to receive American money through various funds. For this, such a PR. To do this, he takes part on the side of the United States in the current information war. We must not forget the low inner culture of this hypocrite. Makarevich took the enemy’s position in the information war. This person must be adequately trained. Like an enemy.
  14. Kibalchish
    Kibalchish 4 October 2014 07: 59
    +5
    Makakrevich, of course, shit, but Mikhalkov is no better.

    OFF TOP

    The news has just passed on the news that 200 Bundeswehr troops will be sent to the East of Ukraine, ostensibly to protect the staff of the OSCE mission. In fact, there is no doubt that they will participate in battles against the Donbass militia. There are too many on the scales and in Berlin they are ready to go all-in. It remains only to wish the brave German lads the same fate as their grandfathers 70 years ago.
    Also, on the initiative of the same Germany, new sanctions will soon be introduced.
    1. alicante11
      alicante11 4 October 2014 10: 36
      +2
      In fact, there is no doubt that they will participate in battles against the Donbass militia. There are too many on the scales and in Berlin they are ready to go all-in.


      Hitler went all-in with a couple of hundred divisions, and with a couple of hundred Bundesovoyak Merkel goes not all-in, but ... well ...
  15. andruha70
    andruha70 4 October 2014 08: 04
    +2
    We offer to buy a picture, and they say - "no, we will not buy it." Well, it is not necessary! Why is there a trial? If they clandestinely ride her without receiving permission from us, there will be a court.
    my attitude towards Mikhalkov is not unambiguous. but ... on the outskirts - not only "dill" live. fool could give a picture - for everyone else wink I think - does not get poorer
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 4 October 2014 08: 12
      +5
      Mikhalkov generally obsessed with money. If he believes that his painting will help the Ukrainians and is firmly convinced of this, then he could have presented this painting, otherwise it is likened to a bull who is being led to the slaughterhouse and he knows about it, but he is tormented by the only question: they will let him gobble up the last bale of hay or no!
      1. creak
        creak 4 October 2014 10: 28
        0
        Quote: Saratoga833

        Mikhalkov generally obsessed with money.


        And how could it be otherwise, because the maintenance of their estates and hunting grounds together with numerous servants is not cheap ... Looking at this homegrown boyar, who, incidentally and inappropriately emphasizes his aristocratic origin, recalls an anecdote about Count L. Tolstoy: "Your Excellency has been given to plow." He, like his father, will not disappear under any power ...
    2. Kindof
      Kindof 4 October 2014 12: 08
      0
      How .. He will give
      To whom is war, and to whom is mother dear ..
  16. Lyolik
    Lyolik 4 October 2014 08: 06
    +3
    Since Soviet times, I didn’t like Makarevich, but I didn’t like it. Everything about him was always repulsive, and this disgust has surfaced in him now. And Mikhalkov thinks I truly support him.
  17. Kakaktus
    Kakaktus 4 October 2014 08: 09
    +1
    We have raised the "cult of attention" to such an extent, among the amorous intelligentsia. that they are afraid of being forgotten, that they are ready for any meanness in relation to others and to themselves in order to be in the spotlight. They have forgotten the simple saying, do not spit in the well from which you drink.
  18. mamont5
    mamont5 4 October 2014 08: 14
    +1
    "Mikhalkov: I don't understand why Makarevich lives in Russia"

    Why is there anything incomprehensible? Here he earned money until recently. Now I've run aground. One way of earning money remained - writing libels about Russia, but this can (and even more calmly) be dealt with "over the hill".
  19. quote
    quote 4 October 2014 08: 16
    +1
    Quote: Nagan
    Quote: nablydatel
    threw away all his songs. hi

    And I have nothing to throw away, I never had Makakarevich’s songs.

    I could never listen to this primitive at all. The only "Candle" (reaction of youth) is all creativity for a cloud of years. Well, as a result, touch the frying pan on Smake.
  20. sv68
    sv68 4 October 2014 08: 17
    +2
    Mchi-R-Karevich lives in Russia because alas, no law has been passed by which such jackals should automatically lose their citizenship and will be expelled from Russia without the right to return. And here is another question, why does Chmy-R-Karevich live in this world not in our competence - alas again ...
  21. Vityok
    Vityok 4 October 2014 08: 28
    +1
    Makarevich! Suitcase-station-abroad! am Judas.
  22. surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 4 October 2014 08: 36
    +1
    We offer to buy a picture, and they say - "no, we will not buy it." Well, it is not necessary! Why is there a trial? If they clandestinely ride her without receiving permission from us, there will be a court.

    Aya, too, will not watch, neither clandestinely nor legally. The last time he "tired" everyone twice, and now he wants to finish it off. He ended as a director, out of greed and arrogance.
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 4 October 2014 12: 14
      +1
      Here is such an opinion about the weary
  23. Mefodi5124
    Mefodi5124 4 October 2014 08: 45
    +1
    Quote: Anton Gavrilov
    I don’t understand why Makarevich lives in Russia - as they say the rhetorical question.

    Well, where else will he be awarded with the awards of the country against which he rose? If so fundamental, throw out your awards in Red Square. Preferably without pomp.
    1. alicante11
      alicante11 4 October 2014 10: 38
      0
      Yeah, and return all the money for the concerts received and for the rental.
  24. valentina-makanalina
    valentina-makanalina 4 October 2014 08: 46
    0
    In the West, no one needs such as Makar. All these "peace fighters" are good only when they shit inside our country, and in the West no one will hear or see them, and they are not known there, except for the special services.
    1. lg41
      lg41 4 October 2014 09: 47
      0
      Americans do not bother to study the political situation in the world. This conclusion was reached by specialists of the sociological company Pew Research Center, who conducted a sociological survey among the country's residents on September 25-28.

      The questionnaire contained 12 questions related to current global issues and US domestic politics. As it turned out, the knowledge of US residents about other countries of the world, however, as well as about the particularities of the political process of their own state, leaves much to be desired.
      As for Ukraine, despite the fact that the events in Kiev and New Russia are widely covered in the Western media, only 60% of Americans have learned that Ukraine used to be part of the USSR. The remaining 40% proposed the options “Yugoslavia”, “Scandinavia”, or they chose the honest “I don't know”.
  25. Signature
    Signature 4 October 2014 09: 11
    +2
    I confess that I see a couple of reasons why A. Makarevich (in fact) has no place abroad.
    Firstly, today's youth (this main locomotive of every show industry) simply cannot win (because like is attracted to like). So an aged minstrel - like air - needs old admirers and fans (in them - as in a mirror - he sees himself as yesterday and finds hope for an eternity of success). Secondly, the never-begging "cook and singer" has grown into purely Russian business structures, which would not be so easy to transpose into some other (trouble! ..). Thirdly, even without loving everything around, a person steadfastly gets used to the unloved, while acquiring the ability to live on "autopilot". And what kind of autopilot in post-crossing, that is, somewhat non-standard circumstances of existence?
    Fourthly, it is here that he is applauded by those whose vital interests he is. And whose interests could A. Makarevich be, say, in the state of Texas or on the Cape Verde Islands? There, he would only feel on his own skin what it was like to be a deflated airship that had just yesterday proudly fluttered over the Kremlin towers. Honestly, it will not be difficult to list at least as many good reasons both for A. Makarevich and for those like him not to love this country with all the fibers of his "subtle artistic" soul (or, more precisely, its surrogate ), but certainly not leave it.
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 4 October 2014 12: 18
      +2
      He is not going to leave, he is waiting for his like-minded people to come to power
      And then he will be "the first to challenge the regime"
  26. Consul-t
    Consul-t 4 October 2014 09: 11
    +1
    I never loved or listened to Makarevich.
    The only song that got me hooked is "Crossroads".
    I wonder who her real author is. I doubt that Makarevich.
    Often listened to Retro Radio. I noticed that recently they have begun to strenuously put on Makar songs. You have to switch to another station. Now I don’t even listen.
    I wrote to them on the site a request not to do this - do not care for smoke, they do not respond.
    1. lg41
      lg41 4 October 2014 09: 39
      +2
      For the fact that the radio station puts on Makarevich’s songs, it receives money from American funds. And the fulfillment of your requests does not bode well. Therefore, such a result. A year ago in Ukraine, similar situations were repeated. This is one of the lines of the modern information war.
  27. nik4422
    nik4422 4 October 2014 09: 17
    -2
    But in my car there are several Makarevich’s songs on the disk, and to my big side who is their author, I just listen to good music and good lyrics.
  28. heretic
    heretic 4 October 2014 09: 46
    0
    Quote: tilovaykrisa
    I never loved Mikhalkov, but in this case I support his position.


    And in the beginning, he kept his nose to the other side. I do not respect such people, even though right now they are speaking correctly.
  29. Evilcat
    Evilcat 4 October 2014 09: 48
    0
    Quote: tilovaykrisa
    I never loved Mikhalkov, but in this case I support his position.

    Position on the possible ban on his film in Ukraine? Then I am with you. In Ukraine, such phenomena are not uncommon. Terry nationalism sometimes transcends all reasonable boundaries.
    Here, I remember in 2010 "We are from the future 2" was banned. Well, what was it about this film? And the movie itself is shitty. Who just criticized her.
  30. yana532912
    yana532912 4 October 2014 09: 56
    0
    Read yesterday’s article by A. Zubchenko at http://www.versii.com. All forbid. Party line and no nails. Already on an Internet swing. It is impossible not to be completely duped to tempt, or to give an attempt to reflect.
  31. prishelec
    prishelec 4 October 2014 10: 20
    0
    So we rack our brains over this fact and do not understand why this pimple lives in Russia.
  32. dimasialyt
    dimasialyt 4 October 2014 10: 38
    +1
    Well, about Mikhalkov is a separate topic. He is the "oracle" himself! And why should Makarevich leave ?! Here he is an idol and an icon for so many. And outside of our immense? .. An old red-haired Semite that has not been shaved for a long time ...
    1. Normal
      Normal 4 October 2014 11: 20
      +1
      Quote: dimasialyt
      Here he is an idol and an icon so far for so many

      Come on, what kind of idol is he? He was an idol in the late seventies and early eighties, before the movie "Soul", and then became "Yesterday's Hero", traveler, scuba diver and solicitor in "Smack".
      Just where should he go? In Russia, the largest audience speaks Russian. The largest market for his already almost unclaimed creativity. Money and familiar surroundings are what holds him.
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 4 October 2014 11: 29
        +3
        Quote: Normal
        In Russia, the largest audience speaks Russian. The largest market for his already almost unclaimed creativity.

        This is accurate ...
        Concerts are either disrupted or canceled "for technical reasons" ...
  33. Wad
    Wad 4 October 2014 10: 45
    -3
    This is not in Russian, to finish off the fallen Makar. And you raise, wash, feed and he will still sing.
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 4 October 2014 11: 46
      0
      Quote: wad
      and he will still sing.

      Ukraine has not died yet, "what?
    2. ded10041948
      ded10041948 4 October 2014 16: 11
      0
      He, like the last pig, stained himself and should we launder? Maybe also reward?
  34. Normal
    Normal 4 October 2014 10: 58
    -2
    Eh, I do not believe the gentleman.
    Once, during the State Emergency Committee, the Mikhalkovs at the family council made a brilliant decision; Sergei Mikhalkov went to the Central Committee of the CPSU, Nikita to the city hall of Moscow to Gaidar, and Andron rushed to Italy. Thus, they insured themselves on any outcome of the confrontation.
    No wonder the epigram is written on them:
    "Russia, can you smell this itch?
    Three Mikhalkovs are crawling over you ... "

    And here the master shows his rotten gut. One side
    Nikita Mikhalkov is sure that his new painting “Sunstroke”, which will be released worldwide on October 9, will not be shown in Ukraine ....
    - But her Ukrainian audience needs not just to watch! You need to watch it like an antibiotic! She tells what happened to them. She warns us what can happen if we do not think! This message is very important ...

    And right there
    We offer to buy a picture, ...
    If they clandestinely ride her without receiving permission from us, there will be a court.

    Here it is. A very important message is invited ... to buy!
    So what is important to the master? To convey messages, or to raise the dough?
    Here, as in a joke about a Jewish priest in a bathhouse - "You, priest, either take off the cross, or put on your panties"
  35. Federal
    Federal 4 October 2014 11: 45
    0
    And who is Makarevich now? Before, yes there was such a singer "Time Machine" And now who is this ??? Host of the Smack program? Isn't there too much honor, they began to pay attention to this person, And why did someone decide that this person deserves some kind of personal attention?
  36. family tree
    family tree 4 October 2014 12: 49
    +2
    Some kind of Nikita, the sun is not good. It will tire someone, then it will hit. belay
    1. Normal
      Normal 4 October 2014 14: 33
      -1
      Quote: perepilka
      Some kind of Nikita, the sun is not good. It will tire someone, then it will hit.

      good laughing
  37. Sanglier
    Sanglier 4 October 2014 13: 41
    0
    Mikhalkov may not be loved for his lordly attitude towards others. But his position in defending the positions of the Russian empire cannot be disrespected. And this is not a "pose", but the position of a Russian person.
  38. clidon
    clidon 4 October 2014 14: 50
    0
    Mikhalkov always hesitated along with the party line. Imagine that he took it and said that there is a solution from above, but I am against it, it is simply impossible.
  39. Aydar
    Aydar 4 October 2014 17: 16
    +2
    strange person Mikhalkov, like an intellectual, positioned himself saying that it was hard to create in the USSR, any deviation supposedly from a unified opinion of the Communist Party was stifled by creativity, thoughts could not be stated, and then suddenly he says that the loan Makarevich lives in Russia if he has an excellent opinion? Eh Mikhalk, so you can agree before the introduction of full censorship and the restoration of the former Criminal Code of the USSR. It seems to me that Mikhalkov is just a conjuncturist.
    1. Pazifist87
      Pazifist87 6 October 2014 09: 30
      0
      Apple tree from apple tree, senior wrote three hymn, that the record is absolute, and licked all his life w ... pu to everyone who is on top (even called his son Nikita Sergeyevich, you know who the bend is for yourself), and his son will soon surpass him.
      Moreover, with his last films (12, nonstoyanie, stronghold), he proved his complete artistic helplessness and the absence of even the elementary ability to make films. His only fight for a flasher for himself is what it costs.

      In general, Barin and the chief Besogon are utterly opportunistic insignificance. No better than Makarevich.
  40. ruff
    ruff 4 October 2014 21: 03
    0
    I never liked Makarevich. As a singer, how ... So-so ... pop ... I don't like Russia - you went to ... And who will accept you?
  41. Siberian
    Siberian 4 October 2014 22: 32
    -1
    "... If you are still men, you are strong in something ..." (Sanya Makarevich). And we (madam sex) put on (always!), Which is not something, but a lot of something (I don't even stutter about everything). He's been in something all his life. Therefore, no one needs them in the west either, there are 3 tons of them per hectare.
    1. ruff
      ruff 4 October 2014 22: 48
      0
      Too smart ... And now decipher who, and that something and something. Do not understand.
    2. ruff
      ruff 4 October 2014 22: 49
      0
      Siberian. I am Ural!
  42. Vend
    Vend 6 October 2014 11: 46
    0
    You can have any relation to Mikhalkov’s films, to some of his actions, but here he says the matter. This time I support him.