Russia caught up with the US in the number of carriers of nuclear weapons

134
For the first time in the new 21 century, Russia caught up with the United States in the number of all nuclear carriers weapons The Strategic Nuclear Forces (SNF) and the number of warheads, according to Vedomosti, citing the US Department of State published yesterday information obtained during the exchange of data on strategic weapons.

Russia caught up with the US in the number of carriers of nuclear weapons


The exchange of such information is provided for by the START-3 Treaty of 2011. “According to this contract, deployed carriers of the SNF are taken into account - nuclear-powered submarines with ballistic missiles (SSBNs), strategic bombers and intercontinental ground-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) —for example, undeveloped carriers SSBNs with missiles unloaded at the moment) and warheads on deployed carriers, ”explains the publication.

According to Pavel Podvig, the head of the Russian Nuclear Weapons project, “the growth of deployed warheads and carriers in both states is due to the fact that in recent years the Russian navy has begun to receive atomic submarines of the new Bulava missile project "with several warheads."

“So, at the end of last year, the second submarine of this type,“ Alexander Nevsky, ”was accepted into the Russian Navy: each of its 16 missiles is considered to be a carrier under the agreement and, as stated, carries six warheads. In addition, the deployment of the Topol-M ICBM with one warhead was stopped, and the Yars rocket with three warheads was deployed instead, ”the Exploit explained with examples.

In his opinion, “by 2018, when the restrictions for both parties defined by the START-3 contract come into force, the approximate parity between the strategic nuclear forces of Russia and the USA will be maintained, while in 2000-s. there was a tendency to reduce Russian nuclear forces at a faster pace than the American ones, since in Russia, carriers that had served their time were written off faster ”.

However, the expert warns against a reassessment of the formal achievement of parity: "The rules for offsetting under the START-3 agreement are such that in the case of, for example, setting SSBNs for repair and unloading missiles from it, it is not considered deployed." Such cases, he said, "have been to the United States and led to a temporary decrease in the number of declared carriers and warheads."

In addition, there is another factor in achieving parity: a decrease in the rate of write-off of Topol. “However, these missiles will still be, in the end, written off, and by 2018, the United States will once again have some advantage in warheads,” said the project manager.

  • RIA News
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

134 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +98
    3 October 2014 19: 11
    I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue
    1. +49
      3 October 2014 19: 13
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus

      ON THE! wassat
      1. +27
        3 October 2014 19: 19
        Yes ON! laughing In the evening hummed popper?
        1. Cenij150814
          +16
          3 October 2014 19: 53
          Quote: RU-Officer
          In the evening hummed popper?

          We can make up our minds: the Russian Federation has caught up with the United States in terms of the number of carriers of nuclear weapons, which is now the meat will become cheaper belay
          1. mazhnikof.Niko
            +4
            3 October 2014 20: 21
            Quote: Cenij150814
            We can make up our minds: the Russian Federation has caught up with the United States in terms of the number of carriers of nuclear weapons, which is now the meat will become cheaper


            Not - it won't get cheaper. However, the number of "prayers" for peace will have to be brought to 6 (six)!
          2. +10
            3 October 2014 20: 58
            We can make up our minds: the Russian Federation has caught up with the United States in terms of the number of carriers of nuclear weapons, which is now the meat will become cheaper
            CHEAPER. The meat of amerikosov. But, ATTENTION, it is radioactive.
            1. Cenij150814
              +4
              3 October 2014 21: 03
              Quote: aleks700
              CHEAPER. The meat of amerikosov. But, ATTENTION, it is radioactive.

              Checked out the joker laughing good
            2. +1
              3 October 2014 23: 45
              and recently there was a note that in Germany wild boars were infected ... allegedly the Chernobyl trail ...
        2. 0
          4 October 2014 09: 52
          In the evening hummed popper?

          This information is good not only for the sake of humor !!!
          And if you consider how many our warrant officers have hidden in their "nychkami" .... then ... !!!
          Watch out, Americans!
      2. +5
        3 October 2014 19: 31
        wassat [quote = Setrac] I am the first to comment on me plus tongue[
        Here you go + wassat
    2. +9
      3 October 2014 19: 16
      Do you happen to have a blog on LJ? And then I remembered their "first on ..!"
      1. +8
        3 October 2014 19: 17
        Quote: il grand casino
        Do you happen to have a blog on LJ?

        and will not am
    3. +25
      3 October 2014 19: 16
      Catch up with and overtake America in the production of meat and milk!
      1. +8
        3 October 2014 19: 18
        Quote: MooH
        Catch up with and overtake America in the production of meat and milk!

        Drink tomato juice good lol
        1. +8
          3 October 2014 19: 23
          In Khrushchev’s times, such a machine was built by us on DIP-500. WE WILL RETURN AND DRIVE
          By the way, the machine was, and still sometimes, very good.
          1. +6
            3 October 2014 19: 41
            And also Deep 300, etc. depending on the diameter being machined.
          2. +6
            3 October 2014 19: 48
            Quote: Silkway0026
            In Khrushchev’s times, our DIP-500 was such a machine.

            Well, let's say they made three hundred in the 32nd, and four hundred and five hundred in the thirties went, so the corncob is bald, here, it seems, is not the case. It’s another matter that they did it later, I have 1m63 at work, the 61st year of production, nothing machine, when it takes time and there is time, you can catch a couple of hundred parts in size.
            1. +2
              3 October 2014 23: 49
              DIP is the first domestic machine with an individual drive.

              Well, two hundred square meters, consider "free size" laughing
          3. +2
            3 October 2014 20: 01
            We catch up and pile on as it should am
          4. +4
            3 October 2014 21: 12
            In Sevastopol, in one of the enterprises in 1990, he set up a DIP-400 of 1927 in perfect condition; most importantly, this veteran survived the German occupation by the ruins of the workshop!
          5. +1
            4 October 2014 00: 02
            in some industries, the living also has a DIP-300 laughing
            1. 0
              4 October 2014 00: 30
              Well, this kind of DIP-300 (1M63) was produced a lot, I worked in the Tbilisi version for 15 years, and of course Ryazan will be more reliable. And at the expense of replacing it, there are no analogues and the machine is not expected to be made as they say for "people" the main thing is to keep an eye on it, the machine is reliable!
              1. +2
                4 October 2014 01: 01
                The machine is reliable, quickly and easily repaired, and therefore can serve for decades even if, of course, the frame is not killed. We have ship shafts pierced on them. In the city there are not so many (up to ten), so everything is for the record. They work and will work, only hands change - like a passing banner.
          6. sazhka4
            0
            4 October 2014 04: 07
            Quote: Silkway0026
            By the way, the machine was, and still sometimes, very good.

            In Tashkent, at Tapoich, I used this "coca". Terrible thing ..
        2. +20
          3 October 2014 19: 50
          Quote: Ruslan67
          Quote: MooH
          Catch up with and overtake America in the production of meat and milk!

          Drink tomato juice good lol

          ADVERTISEMENT!
          Drink tomato juice! Tomato juice is health !! Health is a sport !!! Sport is a victory !!!! Victory is glory !!!!! Glory is money !!!!!! Money is women !!!!!!! Women are syphilis ...
          DO NOT DRINK TOMATO JUICE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! fellow
          PS Dear, our dear women !!! love Ignore me, the fool, and my stupid words. We, bumpkin, in spite of everything we love you and bow before you !!! love love love
          1. +8
            3 October 2014 20: 27
            If you don’t want tomato juice, drink cucumber lotion.
            It is known that cucumber lotion is neither health, nor sport, nor fame, nor money, and naturally NOT WOMEN ...
            There is no syphilis either!
            And if you drink tincture of hawthorn with a woman?
            Nothing too, but syphilis is possible ...
            It turns out tincture of hawthorn provokes sexually transmitted diseases. request what

            DO NOT DRINK THE HAWTHORN TREATY !!!!!!!
        3. +2
          3 October 2014 19: 50
          Quote: Ruslan67
          Quote: MooH
          Catch up with and overtake America in the production of meat and milk!

          Drink tomato juice good lol

          ADVERTISEMENT!
          Drink tomato juice! Tomato juice is health !! Health is a sport !!! Sport is a victory !!!! Victory is glory !!!!! Glory is money !!!!!! Money is women !!!!!!! Women are syphilis ...
          DO NOT DRINK TOMATO JUICE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! fellow
          PS Dear, our dear women !!! love Ignore me, the fool, and my stupid words. We, bumpkin, in spite of everything we love you and bow before you !!! love love love
      2. +5
        3 October 2014 19: 46
        Let stupid people chase. We need reasonable sufficiency.
    4. +3
      3 October 2014 19: 21
      NA-ON1 You are not Alibasov’s case wassat
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +3
      3 October 2014 19: 23

      Setrac (3) RU  Today, 19: 11 New
      I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue


      ... and that you can only plus recourse laughing
      1. +4
        3 October 2014 19: 26
        Quote: bubalik
        ... and that you can only plus

        He hopes so nasty feel laughing
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +3
      3 October 2014 19: 24
      here is a bastard and ??????
    9. +3
      3 October 2014 19: 35
      Hammer, cho! Hold the cross laughing
      1. +5
        3 October 2014 19: 37
        Quote: perepilka
        Hammer, cho! Hold the cross

        Seamlessly approaching: Volobuev! There you are.... wassat
        1. +3
          3 October 2014 19: 41
          Colleagues hi Pay attention to how quickly the creature is for which the good mood of others is - ass am
        2. +4
          3 October 2014 20: 03
          Quote: Ruslan67
          Seamlessly approaching: Volobuev

          Do not confuse, I, even from work and ottamsam, but there was like a sword? what ... or buoy ... not, without b, the fig is not a cross, I remember exactly, although, what difference does it make, the truth is still drinks
          1. +3
            3 October 2014 20: 10
            Quote: perepilka
            but was there like a sword? what ... or buoy.

            And the sword and that buoy laughing And of them a good cross can be folded wassat drinks
            1. +2
              3 October 2014 20: 21
              Quote: Ruslan67
              And the sword and the same buoy laughing. And of them you can fold a good cross. Wassat drinks

              Introduced what U mnu, what is the coat of arms of the office for Brit Mil turned out belay
    10. +4
      3 October 2014 19: 40
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue

      And how do you, colleague, just get it ?!
      Good luck, nosy you are ours !!! drinks
    11. +4
      3 October 2014 19: 40
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue

      And how do you, colleague, just get it ?!
      Good luck, nosy you are ours !!! drinks
      1. +2
        3 October 2014 21: 11
        Quote: ksv1973
        Good luck, nosy you are ours !!!

        Serega, this is more likely to apply to you: I duplicated my post and scanned 2 times by 3 points! nosy you are ours !!!laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          3 October 2014 21: 40
          Quote: BoA KAA
          Quote: ksv1973
          Good luck, nosy you are ours !!!

          Serega, this is more likely to apply to you: I duplicated my post and scanned 2 times by 3 points! nosy you are ours !!!laughing

          Sasha, hello! hi I’ve been at TOPWAR for a little over a year now, but I still don’t understand: why sometimes my statements are duplicated. But he noticed that this happens when I write either at home or from a personal tablet. There are no duplicates from a working computer. Believe me - this, to put it mildly, makes me nervous.
          I don’t understand computer subtleties. So if you can enlighten me in these very tricks, I will only be grateful. Contacts, as I understand it, you know where to find. Or drop your number on 8-905-781-73-65. I’ll call you back - talk, giggle. What can we - perhaps not relax at the end of the working week?
          Good luck, colleague hi !
    12. The comment was deleted.
    13. +6
      3 October 2014 19: 42
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue

      Plusanul! wassat Because I agree with you! Also very happy for the Strategic Missile Forces and Russia! Strategic Rocket Forces our reliable ally was and will be ..!
    14. +7
      3 October 2014 19: 55
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue


      Well, hold on, comrade. drinks
    15. +4
      3 October 2014 20: 09
      Comedian, thank you laugh, I put a huge plus)
      lol
    16. +14
      3 October 2014 20: 11
      And I have to beat me, am I a redhead?
      1. +5
        3 October 2014 20: 18
        Plus only red !!! laughing
      2. +2
        3 October 2014 20: 21
        Quote: Korvin1000
        And I have to beat me, am I a redhead?


        Yes, no question, comrade. soldier
        And the bear will play us on the balalaika. drinks
      3. +4
        3 October 2014 20: 40
        They do not add to "sloppy", they add to the first. These are the rules.
        The man tried. I hid, waited, maybe with the administrators rubbed, so I did it all.

        Therefore, we envy silently and plus, plus, plus ... request laughing
        1. +2
          4 October 2014 13: 43
          I was sitting in the same ambush. Yes, while I thought what to write)))
      4. FACKtoREAL
        +3
        3 October 2014 20: 45
        drinks hold my "+"
        bully
    17. +3
      3 October 2014 20: 21
      Duplicate, please, I want to expire plus. Good mood - Friday.
      1. +2
        3 October 2014 20: 24
        Quote: Setrac
        I'm the first to comment on me plus

        Quote: Ruslan67
        ON THE!

        Satisfied? laughing drinks
      2. +5
        3 October 2014 20: 25
        Quote: samoletil18
        ...
        Good mood - Friday.


        For the mood. )))

      3. +5
        3 October 2014 21: 14
        Quote: samoletil18
        I want ist plus plus.

        Greetings, Sasha!
        Useful -
        Plusom. Vesch is not new, but reliable. Pounding, though not far, but for sure.
    18. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 30
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus

      Wow, Sergey ... Cunning! Specially uploaded?
      But nowhere to go ... Such rules - deserved - get ... recourse

      Shl. And the moderator can bortanut. Then all the "pluses" go to him ... tongue
    19. FACKtoREAL
      +3
      3 October 2014 20: 40
      managed ... bastards good drinks
      wassat
    20. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 49
      Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus

      Although the first one, it’s a bit late: it’s posted in 19: 07, and the comment is already in 19: 11. But he set his plus - for relevance. And do not pay attention to a bunch of minuses, they were put by envious people.
      1. 0
        3 October 2014 20: 54
        Quote: AQUARIUS 65
        Setrac
        I'm the first to comment on me plus

        Although the first one, it’s a bit late: it was posted at 19:07, and the comment was already at 19:11. But he set his plus - for relevance.


        There is a point of view that Comrade Setrac still read the publication, and not "first tries ..."
    21. +2
      3 October 2014 20: 57
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus

      Sergei! You are 0 original! Well, do you want to add anything else? lol
    22. The comment was deleted.
    23. 0
      3 October 2014 23: 18
      Well, the question is about the means of delivery. God forbid, whatever happens! There will be no winners.
    24. sazhka4
      +1
      4 October 2014 05: 57
      Quote: Setrac
      I'm the first to comment on me plus

      Actually, a terrible indicator .. Anyway .. And the "comment" and the article.
  2. +9
    3 October 2014 19: 12
    The main thing is not to lag behind and rearm on new equipment.
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 21: 22
      Truly FRIDAY has come.
      1. sazhka4
        +1
        4 October 2014 06: 04
        Quote: Patriot.ru.
        Truly FRIDAY has come.

        P I (t) nice)) ??
  3. +9
    3 October 2014 19: 13
    Parity, however, is a very conditional thing. The main thing is to correctly disperse and cover the means of destruction, and, if necessary, deliver them to their intended destination "in the range". Truncated will be OK soldier
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 19: 35
      So what? Despite the fact that these carriers are aimed, in particular, at me personally, I didn’t feel any worse than that. And I will not rush to strengthen and seal the basement in my house. What is the difference, the opportunity to destroy civilization, and indeed life on Earth 5 or 6 times? One time is enough for everyone.
      You better think about what you will do if a couple of millions of Chinese, even without weapons at all, break across the border along its entire length. Do not shoot back - there will not be enough rounds, and even if enough, the machine guns will overheat. And then what? Burn Siberia and Far East with nuclear weapons from this infection? Otherwise, you won’t clean it, but just how then, I don’t say live, but at least work on a rotational basis?
      1. +6
        3 October 2014 19: 48
        Siberia should not be touched. If We are not allowed to live, then no one will live! Even if there is no one to press the "button", the "Dead Hand" system will work, as your government calls it around our perimeter. But we are peaceful people and our armored train ...

        Many summers - to everyone who sings in a dream!
        All parts of the world can lie in the bottom
        All continents can burn in flames -
        But all this is not for me!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        3 October 2014 20: 32
        Quote: Nagan
        So what? ...
        You better think about what you will do if a couple of millions of Chinese, even without weapons at all, break across the border along its entire length. ...

        And why should they break into our climate? In Siberia, rice does not grow, it's chilly, not every Chinese will like it. Even locusts fly only in search of food, in China, that everything can become so bad?
      4. +3
        3 October 2014 21: 38
        Quote: Nagan
        these carriers are aimed, in particular, at me personally, I didn’t feel worse, well, not a bit.

        My dear, the Chinese ICBMs (DF-31) are also aimed at you! Not scary?
        Quote: Nagan
        what will you do if a couple of millions of Chinese, even without weapons at all, break across the border along its entire length. Do not shoot back - there will not be enough rounds, and even if enough, the machine guns will overheat.
        Well, are you all clinging to machine guns !? All out of habit for past wars get ready !?
        Maybe you should think about some "exotic" weapon based on the principle of microwave operation ... And not hundreds of kilometers are burned out of life!
        Quote: Nagan
        And then what?
        Then they are to you across the ocean on the JONKS! (ooooh! how scary!) 10 will trample in millions! - What, do not believe me !? Hmm, why should we believe that they would prefer a sharply continental climate on the territory of the YERNAYA power (you can also get one by one!), Rather than the mild climate of the subtropics of their southern neighbors. In addition, the teeth are less likely to get.
        What can you say, our American friend? wink
      5. +1
        3 October 2014 22: 39
        the Chinese state has been kind for three thousand years and during all this time they stubbornly did not want to move north, and now it is not worth waiting for expansion. China's interest lies more in Southeast Asia, and think for yourself why China will butted with a very strong nuclear power? I think all the speculation about the Chinese threat is time to stop.
        1. +1
          3 October 2014 23: 40
          Quote: 00105042
          I think it's time to stop all speculation about the Chinese threat.

          Right. But with only one amendment: after the word "time" it was necessary to write "for a while."
        2. 0
          3 October 2014 23: 40
          Quote: 00105042
          I think it's time to stop all speculation about the Chinese threat.

          Right. But with only one amendment: after the word "time" it was necessary to write "for a while."
  4. +8
    3 October 2014 19: 13
    In no case should you be inferior in terms of the number of strategic nuclear forces, because the nuclear forces of England and France are still aimed against us.
    1. +6
      3 October 2014 19: 16
      Quote: Thought Giant
      In no case should you be inferior in terms of the number of strategic nuclear forces, because the nuclear forces of England and France are still aimed against us.
      But to whom or against whom is the Chinese nuclear potential directed?
      1. +10
        3 October 2014 19: 26
        Quote: enot73
        But to whom or against whom is the Chinese nuclear potential directed?


        And this, as I understand it, the Chinese themselves do not know. Someone very unlucky. laughing
      2. 0
        3 October 2014 19: 26
        Quote: enot73
        But to whom or against whom is the Chinese nuclear potential directed?


        And this, as I understand it, the Chinese themselves do not know. Someone very unlucky. laughing
        1. +5
          3 October 2014 20: 19
          Lord Immediately visible, Friday! I will reveal a terrible secret: Chinese SNF are aimed at the WINNER! hi
      3. +4
        3 October 2014 20: 16
        Yes, just like ours, he is directed not against, but against ...
        As they say - So that they do not climb!
        Look at North Korea - everyone is like a bone in the throat, not climb.
        And where is Iraq, Libya, "Ukrostan" and the like now.
        Therefore, our ATOM saves us!
        IMHO.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. mazhnikof.Niko
      0
      3 October 2014 20: 37
      Quote: Thought Giant
      In no case should you be inferior in terms of the number of strategic nuclear forces, because the nuclear forces of England and France are still aimed against us.


      Dear, after our, with the STATES "shootout" EVERYONE will be in Hell!
      And England, and France, And China ... In general, "everyone will die" ...
  5. +4
    3 October 2014 19: 14
    The main thing is not quality, but quantity, well, advanced methods of delivery! Thank God and the last we have in stock and in development!
  6. +15
    3 October 2014 19: 14
    It seems to me that such nuclear submarines of the 955 project are needed for each fleet (Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet) for 8 combat units, at least!
    Vilyuchinsk and Gadzhievo are waiting for new submarines, piers already miss new ships!
    1. +25
      3 October 2014 19: 55
      Only on our submarines is such protection .. bully And the bears are on sushi ..))) Even the animals feel on whose side the truth is and God .. The walrus sleeps like a dog calm and sweet .. hehe .. We are invincible anyway!
      1. DDR
        +4
        3 October 2014 20: 07
        Quote: MIKHAN
        The walrus sleeps like a doggie calmly and sweetly ... heh

        Still good Russian vodka! wink Yes
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Maksim...
        +5
        3 October 2014 20: 07
        "Noble beast!" (from)
      4. +2
        3 October 2014 20: 12
        Only on our submarines there is such protection .. bully And the bears are on land ..))) Even the animals feel on whose side the truth and God .. Sleep the walrus like a dog, calm and sweet .. hehe .. We are invincible anyway!

        I may not understand something, but why should the SSBN pop up to the surface. This is because he is unmasking kakbe
      5. +2
        3 October 2014 20: 42
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Walrus sleeps like a doggie calmly and sweetly

        ... and does not know that the cook is already setting up a frying pan.
        To such a heap of high-fat bacon and a proper potato -
        1. +1
          3 October 2014 21: 10
          Chernobyl grade ...
      6. +2
        3 October 2014 21: 10
        But the crest killed a small teddy bear ..............
        How they hate everything Russian, even the little animal is not sorry, pi .... Ry blue-yellow ....
    2. 0
      3 October 2014 20: 13
      It seems to me that such nuclear submarines of the 955 project are needed for each fleet (Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet) for 8 combat units, at least!
      Vilyuchinsk and Gadzhievo are waiting for new submarines, piers already miss new ships!

      On the tab of Krasnoyarsk, this was said by someone from the MO, most likely it will
    3. 0
      4 October 2014 00: 24
      Great photo !!! Made a desktop screen saver! Pride and Strength in each outline of this handsome man! Thanks for the photo! fellow
  7. +2
    3 October 2014 19: 15
    Timely information is not bast ...
  8. +2
    3 October 2014 19: 17
    Stormy and long ... As always, in such cases!
    1. +7
      3 October 2014 19: 28
      Slack is everything! These are the machinations of the imperialists. The United States released another horror story. Like, Russia is arming itself and they have a lot of nuclear weapons. And the fact that the USA itself has a lot of it, so they, in their opinion, can do it. They are a free democratic country with really working laws and human rights) Do not believe the State Department. They have already proved more than once that they cannot be trusted!
  9. Officer
    +12
    3 October 2014 19: 17
    Oblige each oligarch to acquire nuclear submarines for use by the RF Armed Forces.
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 20
      A kind of indulgence before the tax laughing
  10. +8
    3 October 2014 19: 18
    The number of nuclear weapons should be considered in conjunction with the deployment of missile defense systems.
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 09
      with the deployment of missile defense.

      Soon, friend, soon. Missiles for the S-500 test are successful, they say there are no lags from the plan. And carefully watching the video of the fall of the Chelyabinsk meteorite, we can assume that the S-500 is already in service. But that, and suddenly what
      1. +3
        3 October 2014 22: 09
        Quote: Wiruz
        And carefully watching the video of the fall of the Chelyabinsk meteorite, we can assume that the C-500 is already in service.
        Alexey in the video in the IR spectrum can see how a certain body (spindle-shaped!) Caught up and destroyed the meteorite. It looks more like an EMO. And there is reason to believe so. Velikhov a year before the guest from outer space said that the problem of powerful, capacious energy storage units has been successfully solved. And the Chelyabinsk industrial region needs to be very tightly protected, including with the help of the S-500, too. And here is the video!
    2. 0
      3 October 2014 22: 26
      You would remember the strategic defense initiative wassat
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +3
    3 October 2014 19: 20
    Interesting: but for TNW what is the alignment?
    1. +3
      3 October 2014 19: 27
      But this is unknown. Since tactical is not included in the accounting.
      Yes, and in the tactical it is necessary to periodically renew fissile materials, otherwise it may either not explode or not explode.
      1. +2
        3 October 2014 20: 09
        Reassembly of nuclear weapons must be done periodically, uranium is an extremely active metal, and it is difficult to protect it from corrosion, especially hydrogen corrosion. So these "toys" are periodically at work. Any.
        1. +3
          3 October 2014 20: 30
          Today, uranium is not very popular for charges, since it mainly goes to power reactors. But all modern charges are mainly plutonium. Since plutonium is produced in conventional nuclear reactors. And it can be safely removed from SNF. Previously, uranium was blown up, but there is little uranium and it is more difficult to mine, and plutonium is much easier to obtain. And plutonium is needed for a charge less than uranium.
    2. +3
      3 October 2014 20: 24
      Here we are ahead of the rest!
    3. +3
      3 October 2014 21: 00
      Quote: retired
      Interesting: but for TNW what is the alignment?

      This, there is a secret, covered with darkness request But! what There is a tradition that when the missiles and warheads in the Big Battle run out at the sides, the Generals cry out for melee, the remaining Warrant Officers and Michmans come out and with tears in their eyes, tear from their hearts and get several hundred thermonuclear warheads hankered at the time, in the deposits of foot wraps. and carriers.
      And the Merikos will cry out:
      -Oh woe to us, woe! After all, we knew and guessed that the mismanagement of the Russians would destroy us ...
      Here, such a legend what
      Hello Yur! laughing
    4. +4
      3 October 2014 22: 59
      Quote: retired
      Interesting: but for TNW what is the alignment?

      Quote: Gromily4
      But this is unknown. Since tactical is not included in the accounting.

      Quote: muhomor
      Here we are ahead of the rest!

      Hi all!
      In addition to the strategic nuclear forces, there are nuclear weapons, which in our country are hidden by a veil of secrecy even greater than American ones. According to experts, in Russia there are about 2000 of such carriers. The peculiarity of tactical nuclear weapons is that, unlike strategic ones, they are not placed on carriers, but are stored in warehouses, and the carriers are not specialized, but conventional basic weapons. Foreign experts evaluate the Russian arsenal of tactical nuclear warheads in 8000 pieces.
      Among the most important operational tactical nuclear weapons are the Iskander missile systems, which, for example, when deployed in the Kaliningrad Region, acquire the quality of strategic systems for enemy targets located in Poland. Although the launch range of these missiles is only 500 km, the flight time to the objects of the American missile defense system in Poland is only about one minute.
      According to OBS for amers 2600 charges. But partially (in the form of AB B-61 (4) they are located on the territory of 6 military bases of NATO countries at our borders.
      1. 0
        3 October 2014 23: 09
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        Foreign experts evaluate the Russian arsenal of tactical nuclear warheads in 8000 pieces.


        Hi Sasha! Where does infa come from?
      2. 0
        4 October 2014 14: 19
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        Foreign experts evaluate the Russian arsenal of tactical nuclear warheads in 8000 pieces.

        8000pcs !!! This is enough to completely destroy the NATO and Chinese non-nuclear forces, and even to retaliate against enemy territory.
        Khramchikhin was mistaken when he said that NATO and China would destroy the entire Russian nuclear arsenal in a couple of hours
    5. 0
      4 October 2014 14: 15
      Quote: retired
      Interesting: but for TNW what is the alignment?

      RF-5500-6000
      USA-3000-3500
      Just keep in mind that these are approximate estimates. The exact number is unknown to anyone other than the US and Russian leadership hi
  13. +4
    3 October 2014 19: 26
    To develop the latest weapons and restore its former greatness, the only way to shut up the throat of Euro mattresses.
  14. +2
    3 October 2014 19: 28
    Put everything in a heap and bury it deeply wherever under the Ural Mountains. Anyway, when applied - the result is unequivocal - there will be no Earth, and it doesn’t matter, missiles, or just like that.
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 39
      Quote: lexx2038
      Put everything in a heap and bury it deeply wherever under the Ural Mountains. Anyway, when applied - the result is unequivocal - there will be no Earth, and it doesn’t matter, missiles, or just like that.

      It’s impossible in one heap, are you aware of the critical mass?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        3 October 2014 22: 13
        Quote: PENZYAC
        [It’s impossible in one heap, are you aware of the critical mass?

        I know. A heap is a figurative expression, the essence is different.
    2. 0
      3 October 2014 23: 57
      Let the Americans under the Rocky Mountains first lay down their.
  15. +10
    3 October 2014 19: 44
    So what a "Kuzkna mother" you are!
  16. +3
    3 October 2014 19: 48
    So I did not understand - by 18mu there will be parity or not? And did anyone even look at the table? Or am I stupid to hell ???
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 40
      Quote: Absurdidat
      So I did not understand - by 18mu there will be parity or not? And did anyone even look at the table? Or am I stupid to hell ???

      I have a similar feeling. request fool
    2. +1
      3 October 2014 23: 11
      Quote: Absurdidat
      And did anyone even look at the table?

      This table also led me into bewilderment: the first and last lines by date are the same, and by numbers ...
      Quote: Absurdidat
      to 18 will there be parity or not?
      The fact is that the Americans are also not going to stand still:
      US intends to spend in the coming 10 years, 85 billion dollars to modernize its nuclear weapons complex. The creation of new nuclear facilities is expected to begin with 2018 of the year in Kansas City (Missouri), Oak Ridge (Tennessee) and Los Alamos (New Mexico). All old equipment at these enterprises will be replaced by new ones, and the technology for creating charges will be modernized. Production facilities allow to produce up to xnumx nuclear warheads per year.
  17. +11
    3 October 2014 19: 49
    Swedish intelligence services unveiled a photograph taken by a pilot of a country's Air Force reconnaissance aircraft at a time when a Russian Su-27 fighter approached it.
    Beauties keep it up
    1. +3
      3 October 2014 20: 07
      And what, R-27s are still being produced and purchased? Or is it from old stocks?
      1. +1
        3 October 2014 21: 35
        Not purchased (one Ukrainian), but used. There is no other.
        1. 0
          3 October 2014 22: 28
          There is no other.

          But what about RVV-SD?
          1. 0
            3 October 2014 22: 42
            Well, with prototypes you can’t equip a lot. Even the R-77 was delivered almost exclusively to the power supply centers.
  18. +9
    3 October 2014 19: 56
    "US Vice President Joseph Biden, speaking at Harvard University, said that the US and personally President Barack Obama forced the EU to impose sanctions on Russia in response to the situation in Ukraine," WCVB 5 Boston reported.

    "The European Union really did not want this, but the President insisted. Yes, he had to put Europe in an awkward position: despite its own economic interests, the EU made Russia pay," he said.

    At the same time, the US vice president noted that Washington "wants not the collapse of Russia, but its prosperity."
    Read more: http://news.tut.by/world/418136.html

    Squealing ..... Just ... Mother Teresa! laughing
    1. +3
      3 October 2014 20: 13
      Andrey I give my little star to you good US Vice President Joseph Biden also smiled at me laughing
    2. DDR
      +2
      3 October 2014 20: 19
      Quote: combat66
      At the same time, the US Vice President noted that Washington "wants not the collapse of Russia, but its prosperity."

      Yeah, like in a joke. The grandson squeezed his grandmother's throat with a tourniquet when that nose went bleeding crying lol
    3. The comment was deleted.
  19. +3
    3 October 2014 20: 06
    Moreover, this is only according to official data laughing I would not be surprised if, in fact, the Russian Federation has deployed warheads one and a half times more than the United States. It is necessary to somehow compensate for the imbalance in strategic cruise missiles, especially in the Tomahawks.
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 23: 23
      Quote: Wiruz
      I would not be surprised if, in fact, the Russian Federation has deployed warheads one and a half times more than the United States. It is necessary to somehow compensate for the imbalance in strategic cruise missiles, especially in the Tomahawks.

      TNW - the weapon of the battlefield. And this field lies in Europe, among our enemies. The states do not need such a number of charges, because they are unlikely to grow an aggressor "worthy" TNW at their side (in their garden!)! And they have enough for Tomahawks. In addition, they followed the scheme of mini-miniturization of charges and creation of super small "clean" nuclear warheads.
      "Recently, projects of ultra-low-power nuclear charges have been considered in the United States: mini-nux (capacity of hundreds of tons), micro-nux (tens of tons), secret-nux (units of tons). In addition to low power, they should be much cleaner, than their predecessors, ie create minimal radioactive contamination.It is impossible to exclude the appearance in the near future of subminiature nuclear charges created on the basis of isotopes of superheavy transuranic elements with a critical mass of 25 to 500 grams. kurchatovia - 150 grams, and a charger based California, with a capacity of several tons of TNT, can be adapted for firing from a grenade launcher. According to the English journal New Scientist, the Pentagon has begun developing a new nuclear charge of tremendous destructive power, which, acting like a neutron bomb, destroys all life - hafnium bombs. As a result of a bomb explosion, deadly gamma radiation is released, but unlike an atomic bomb no residual radioactivity is formed.
      Calculations show that the polygon outfit for the defeat in the first massive strike of, say, 300 of the most important hypothetical objects of the economy of a sovereign state is approximately 9 of thousands of precision cruise missiles, and for strikes, for example, with 500 - 600, the key links of the military industry require 3 - 3,5 thousand such missiles. For the disorganization of the fuel - the energy system, the destruction of the autonomous energy supply facilities, as well as the basing points of retaliatory strike facilities, 4 - 8 of thousands of cruise missiles will be required. This means that such a massive strike in operation (16 - 20,5 thousand cruise missiles) is quite real, although besides these targets, many other objects will have to be hit, which will require additional sea and space-based weapons. "
      http://old.popmech.ru
      So, the ideas of the "champions of world democracy in the American way" are cannibalistic!
      1. +3
        4 October 2014 00: 03
        Horror, horror, horror. Journalists are such journalists.
        California half-life ... they have their own physics negative
        1. +1
          4 October 2014 08: 27
          Looking for which isotope. There are also half-lives that are quite acceptable in time.
  20. +7
    3 October 2014 20: 09
    It’s like a snowball ... growing among some, growing among others .... Plus, the US is now openly again putting Russia, as before the USSR, into its main enemy .... and Russia has no choice but to rearm and rearm .......
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. +2
    3 October 2014 20: 12
    It’s not yet taken and yet .. They crush the reptiles and die for us for the Russian world! let the earth rest in peace and eternal memory (streets and schools will bear the names of the heroes of New Russia)!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0otAsUZxYqw Донецк аэропорт- Ополченцы повесили флаг ДНР над терминалом аэропорта Донецка
  23. Rocketos
    -1
    3 October 2014 20: 14
    Data crap !!!
    1. +1
      3 October 2014 20: 22
      What is your evidence?
    2. +1
      4 October 2014 14: 28
      1) Learn to write first
      2) But nifiga. The Russian strategic nuclear forces are superior to the American ones both quantitatively and qualitatively. The United States has never had ICBMs equivalent to the RS-20, BZHRK or PGRK. Their SSBNs will fully deplete their resources by 2020 and will not be able to go to sea, aviation -in a miserable state: the B-52 units can rise into the air, and the B-2A and B1B must enter the air defense zone, which is a death sentence for them (by the way, the B-2A is very visible). The case with ground-based ICBMs is even worse. - "Minutemans", which have long depleted their resources, are simply incapable of combat (with the RS-18s the same story, but fortunately they are being replaced).
  24. +1
    3 October 2014 20: 21
    Updating is great!
  25. +4
    3 October 2014 20: 23
    Quote: lexx2038
    Put everything in a heap and bury it deeply wherever under the Ural Mountains. Anyway, when applied - the result is unequivocal - there will be no Earth, and it doesn’t matter, missiles, or just like that.


    Big fists, even in the yard, allow their owner to walk around the yard whenever you want and with whom you want. This does not mean that they should be used, but it is necessary. Unfortunately this is the dogma of the existence of mankind. If you are a quiet bespectacled man muttering about equality and Brotherhood, you will run for beer and give a trifle to everyone who is stronger. Like it, no question, go for it! hi
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      3 October 2014 22: 23
      Quote: Major Yurik
      Quote: lexx2038
      Put everything in a heap and bury it deeply wherever under the Ural Mountains. Anyway, when applied - the result is unequivocal - there will be no Earth, and it doesn’t matter, missiles, or just like that.


      Big fists, even in the yard, allow their owner to walk around the yard whenever you want and with whom you want. This does not mean that they should be used, but it is necessary. Unfortunately this is the dogma of the existence of mankind. If you are a quiet bespectacled man muttering about equality and Brotherhood, you will run for beer and give a trifle to everyone who is stronger. Like it, no question, go for it! hi

      =====================
      I didn’t mean to throw it out, but to mine it as retribution from the other world. Hardly anyone would then want to dismember Russia. The whole world will answer, an analogue of the "dead hand", only more reliable and controlled.
  26. 0
    3 October 2014 20: 47
    Well, all Tanu is definitely kirdyk!
  27. arthur_hammer
    0
    3 October 2014 20: 51
    Now we need to equalize in the number of aircraft carriers, or we need to build 6 pcs - this is a long way to go, it’s easier for amers to eliminate 6 pcs. This can be done in 1 hour)))))
  28. 0
    3 October 2014 20: 57
    drinks
    Quote: Setrac
    Setrac (3) Today, 19:11 New
    I'm the first to comment on me plus

    drinks
  29. 0
    3 October 2014 20: 58
    Quote: MooH

    Mooh
    Catch up with and overtake America in the production of meat and milk!


    All the same, in terms of cranberries, America will not catch up with us !!!
    La la la
    All the same, in terms of cranberries, America will not catch up with us !!!
  30. 0
    3 October 2014 21: 06
    Now you can .. Well, for the referendum in Alaska ... etc.))) drinks (there is some truth in every joke))) In Ukraine, you don’t need to shut yourself .. Forward, only forward ... (here is Cuba, Venezuela) waiting for us ...! Go Russia..
  31. 0
    3 October 2014 21: 20
    By the way, a photo is a charging compartment with an acoustics system from a torpedo of caliber 533 mm! besides well, very ancient !!!
  32. 0
    3 October 2014 21: 22
    It is also necessary to improve delivery systems, including space and hypersonic ones, as staff members are now testing. And missile defense systems.
  33. +1
    3 October 2014 21: 25
    But is there a fundamental difference, once we destroy each other or a hundred?
  34. +1
    3 October 2014 21: 27
    From time to time we catch up with them, they overtake us. The contract has many positions where you can check and then rejoice that we have bought a foe. That’s why it is a contract, while it’s valid, that its observance gives confidence (confidence, not an illusion) that with its most accurate execution we will be alive. This mechanism was polished for many years and many times. Tales about the colonels who stopped something there - nonsense! Only similar contracts (with penny prescribed protocols for their implementation) still give us the opportunity to live.
    PS And some baboons who were allowed to frolic on the lawn in the District of Columbia are still not aware that humanity is a little more than a tribe, from where this monkey was pulled out recently!
  35. Mol
    Mol
    +1
    3 October 2014 21: 53
    Russia caught up with the US in the number of carriers of nuclear weapons

    "... from here, guys, our Motherland dictates its unyielding will to the rest of the world community!
    Can we fuck ?!
    We will definitely bang! And more than once! The whole world is in dust! ... But then. " laughing

    DMB
  36. +3
    3 October 2014 21: 56
    Quote: samoletil18
    Duplicate, please, I want to expire plus. Good mood - Friday.

    All with Friday! Glory to our nuclear triad !!!
  37. +1
    3 October 2014 22: 27
    Nuclear parity, good thing smile
    But I hope a nuclear war, not us, not our children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and so on will not see smile
  38. +1
    3 October 2014 22: 34
    Who cares how many carriers. A piece of twenty missiles in order to feel confident in the international arena should be enough.
  39. +1
    3 October 2014 22: 38
    Good news, the loaf is vigorous.
  40. +1
    3 October 2014 22: 48
    That's right, so as not to relax)
  41. +1
    3 October 2014 23: 16
    Here is the news for you. Have we ever lagged behind? In THIS region, at least TOTALLY, even the noble western blower Gorbachev did not meddle. Even Alkash didn’t particularly go there, preferring to piss on planes and conduct orchestras. And the West giggled and waved, but one hell was afraid to shit, and suddenly ... Instead of normal leaders of the USSR, such clowns. In the top leadership of a country with huge nuclear weapons, you see who the hell. It seems to me that the West itself was afraid that they had done in the early 90's. They were able to pull the traitors (Gorbachev, Yeltsin) to the feeder, but they did not grow together anymore.
  42. Pyckaya-dubina
    +1
    3 October 2014 23: 26
    Keep it up! Hooray, Russia go ahead!
  43. 0
    3 October 2014 23: 35
    Quote: raven75
    Here is the news for you. Have we ever lagged behind? In THIS region, at least TOTALLY, even the noble western blower Gorbachev did not meddle. Even Alkash didn’t particularly go there, preferring to piss on planes and conduct orchestras. And the West giggled and waved, but one hell was afraid to shit, and suddenly ... Instead of normal leaders of the USSR, such clowns. In the top leadership of a country with huge nuclear weapons, you see who the hell. It seems to me that the West itself was afraid that they had done in the early 90's. They were able to pull the traitors (Gorbachev, Yeltsin) to the feeder, but they did not grow together anymore.


    Thank you.
    A bit straightforward. But I agree with your words 100%
  44. Ashtiger
    0
    3 October 2014 23: 57
    So it seems like they never lagged behind. Especially when you consider that the United States has not only failed to develop and renew the nuclear triad for a long time, but, on the contrary, having completely abandoned it as a weapon of defense, spends all its money on means of attack. Most of the "active" US warheads are completely incapacitated.
    Here is a detailed analysis
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lkk0X99WSgo
    While Russia is testing and introducing new delivery vehicles and new carriers. I believe that they have better weapons on the battlefield, but here it is not the quality of the weapon that decides, but the quality of the fighters and fighting spirit. The United States has long lost ground in strategic defense - this explains the effort to build up missile defense systems and deploy them near the borders of Russia.
  45. 0
    4 October 2014 00: 11
    Quote: Setrac
    I'm the first to comment on me plus tongue

    finally handsome
  46. 0
    4 October 2014 01: 34
    What stupid table is given? How can it be that there would be opposite numbers on the same date?
  47. +2
    4 October 2014 02: 16
    Well, one more good news. And with the production of new nuclear submarines and complexes, as well as nuclear trains in Russia, the Americans will be completely upset wassat
  48. Viktor Kudinov
    0
    4 October 2014 03: 59
    The question is: And what do the US hold their fingers in a fan? We must live together!
  49. Viktor Kudinov
    0
    4 October 2014 04: 09
    The world is too fragile. And this ammunition is enough for many times to appease everyone.
  50. Khalmamed
    +1
    4 October 2014 05: 31
    [/ quote] CHEAPER. The meat of amerikosov. But, ATTENTION, it is radioactive. [/ Quote]

    I knew about the human being in the shit burgers, but how about radioactivity ..?
    BE FAVORABLE inf. with respect
  51. nik2530
    -1
    4 October 2014 06: 20
    Propaganda. Apart from the United States, we are also opposed by England, France, Israel, China, Pakistan and other nuclear powers. The mace flies every other time, so the second launch will end in the death of the submarine. We have two or three nuclear missiles, the rest are outdated or destroyed over the past 15 years.
    1. 0
      4 October 2014 14: 36
      Quote: nik2530
      Propaganda. Apart from the United States, we are also opposed by England, France, Israel, China, Pakistan and other nuclear powers. The mace flies every other time, so the second launch will end in the death of the submarine. We have two or three nuclear missiles, the rest are outdated or destroyed over the past 15 years.

      In 2020, they plan to replace the mace with an alternative, the R-29RMU-3 Sineva-2, and until then the Project 667BDRM with the R-29RMU2 Liner, which is superior to the Trident-2 in all respects, will be on combat duty.
      There are 40 yars in stock, each with up to 6 warheads.
      About “missiles are outdated” - nonsense, nonsense, nonsense, because most of the missiles in the Strategic Missile Forces are new, and in 2018 a new ICBM “Sarmat” will appear, and even cooler “Voevoda”
  52. 0
    4 October 2014 07: 26
    We don't need to catch up or overtake anyone. There is a concept of politics and risks. If necessary and time dictates decisions, they must be carried out in order not to lose the country and independence. Of course, we are also talking about being ahead... although at first glance the things are contradictory. However, everything is decided by necessity. Nuclear charges Less than what the opponents have may be enough, the main thing is that they can guarantee security.
  53. 0
    4 October 2014 07: 44
    Russia caught up with the US in the number of carriers of nuclear weapons
  54. Steel loli
    0
    4 October 2014 12: 12
    It makes no sense to say who has how many warheads and delivery vehicles, it makes sense to say who has the best national air defense. The better the air defense, the fewer warheads will reach the target.
  55. 0
    6 October 2014 18: 43
    What kind of poor date plate is this?

    We caught up - good. But this is not due to growth in Russia, but due to a decrease in the United States. Is this a reason to be proud?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"