The head of the British Foreign Ministry made a tough statement on Russia

98
The head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom made a tough statement on Russia during the conference of the Conservative Party, threatening the introduction of new measures as a response to Russia's actions in Ukraine.

The head of the British Foreign Ministry made a tough statement on Russia


Hammond noted that after a long period of the Cold War, Britain “offered Russia investment, trade and partnership,” but she “chose confrontation.”

“We should be proud that the UK was a leader in the introduction of far-reaching sanctions, which make it clear that we will not tolerate Russia's illegal actions. And we will not allow intimidation of our NATO allies in Eastern Europe. Let me remind Mr. Putin: threats to any NATO member will be met by a response from the whole of NATO. That is why we sent our Typhoon fighters to the Baltic and will do it again if necessary. Because NATO and the principle of collective self-defense helped us in the difficult times of the Cold War and will remain the key principle of our defense policy in the future, ”the RIA policy quoted "News".

Relations between the Russian Federation and the West began to deteriorate after the outbreak of the crisis in Ukraine. After the annexation of the Crimea to Russia, the European Union and the United States imposed a whole package of sanctions against companies, banks and other sectors of the Russian economy.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Valentine77 64
    +45
    2 October 2014 07: 45
    "Again the Englishwoman shits"
    1. +24
      2 October 2014 07: 46
      Quote: Valentine77 64
      Again the Englishwoman shits "


      Does what works best.
    2. +15
      2 October 2014 07: 49
      The poodle's voice erupted
      1. +8
        2 October 2014 08: 35
        Because NATO and the principle of collective self-defense helped us in the difficult times of the Cold War and will remain a key principle of our defense policy in the future, ”the RIA Novosti politician quotes.


        Knocking out money from European taxpayers for the club of NATO killers. Only now it will be necessary to defend against ISIS, I think, they will not forgive collective bombing. In the way, gentlemen ... "peacekeepers"
        1. +6
          2 October 2014 08: 54
          It is necessary to assign the names of cities to each PU ... Well, like - New York, Chicago, London, etc.
      2. +5
        2 October 2014 08: 58
        ... made a tough statement on Russia ...

        ... and in the village of Gadyukino-rains ...
    3. +26
      2 October 2014 07: 52
      I think his rotation betrayed and the axis was my genital organ! And for each Typhoon we have our own S-300 or S-400!
    4. +14
      2 October 2014 08: 12
      Quote: Valentine77 64
      Again the Englishwoman shits "


      This source of abomination I forgot, I probably forgot the secret that the cornman of the British king discovered, about the amount of special ammunition needed to completely clean the islands of Britain from the people who inhabit it .... It must be reminded ... By the way, there are only 4 pieces.
      1. SSR
        +3
        2 October 2014 08: 23
        Quote: Sakhalininets
        Quote: Valentine77 64
        Again the Englishwoman shits "


        This source of abomination I forgot, I probably forgot the secret that the cornman of the British king discovered, about the amount of special ammunition needed to completely clean the islands of Britain from the people who inhabit it .... It must be reminded ... By the way, there are only 4 pieces.

        And the poodle's rockets are kept in Scotland. Here is a "fair" division of responsibility.
        1. +3
          2 October 2014 09: 06
          Quote from S.S.R.
          And their mines with poodle rockets are kept in Scotland.

          What do you have in mind? What mines? The strategic nuclear forces of Great Britain now have only the naval component-4 SSBNs with Trident-2 missiles. By the way, the British themselves cannot launch nuclear missiles, but only by agreement with the United States. For this, an American officer is included in the duty shift by launching missiles. The ground component, in our understanding, as the Strategic Missile Forces, Great Britain never had. Strategic bombers were in service. " Volcano "capable of carrying nuclear weapons, but they have long been eliminated.
      2. +1
        2 October 2014 08: 29
        Quote: Sakhalininets
        By the way, there you need only 4 pieces.

        Well this, if applied. And if you just show, then one is enough.
    5. +7
      2 October 2014 08: 27
      The trouble for the British is that they do not have a new Churchill, and the Americans have Roosevelt for a successful confrontation with Russia ... I hope our "Stalin" in his best understanding will be able to outwit them again ...
      1. 0
        2 October 2014 11: 30
        I dare say that it was Roosevelt who was not a notorious opponent of the USSR. Unlike his follower.

        But in general, English women, this nation of infamous prim cattle, always tried to plunge the rest of the world into war, and to sit on their God-damned island and weld themselves on the sufferings of the countries and people who plunged them into the war.
        1. +1
          2 October 2014 20: 04
          Quote: yu-xnumx
          I dare say that it was Roosevelt who was not a notorious opponent of the USSR. Unlike his follower.

          But in general, English women, this nation of infamous prim cattle, always tried to plunge the rest of the world into war, and to sit on their God-damned island and weld themselves on the sufferings of the countries and people who plunged them into the war.

          BRAVO !!!!!!! THE BULL'S EYE !!!
          England since the time of Peter I was, often indirectly - through Sweden and Germany - the main thorn in the body of Russia. She transferred this foul feature to her miscarriage - the United States, their mother in Alaska, America. So they, sitting across the ocean, in every way spoil the rest of the world.
          But now the decrepit mother and the elderly child devouring her, have already begun to understand that the one whom they and their servants have repeatedly considered "the Colossus with feet of clay" is in fact the Phoenix bird.
        2. 0
          2 October 2014 20: 04
          Quote: yu-xnumx
          I dare say that it was Roosevelt who was not a notorious opponent of the USSR. Unlike his follower.

          But in general, English women, this nation of infamous prim cattle, always tried to plunge the rest of the world into war, and to sit on their God-damned island and weld themselves on the sufferings of the countries and people who plunged them into the war.

          BRAVO !!!!!!! THE BULL'S EYE !!!
          England since the time of Peter I was, often indirectly - through Sweden and Germany - the main thorn in the body of Russia. She transferred this foul feature to her miscarriage - the United States, their mother in Alaska, America. So they, sitting across the ocean, in every way spoil the rest of the world.
          But now the decrepit mother and the elderly child devouring her, have already begun to understand that the one whom they and their servants have repeatedly considered "the Colossus with feet of clay" is in fact the Phoenix bird.
    6. 0
      2 October 2014 08: 57
      "Again the Englishwoman is crap" Oh, how Nikita Sergeevich is not enough in the UN.
      1. +3
        2 October 2014 11: 31
        Thank you, we don’t need this goat. Let it rot where it is now. If it came to life, it would be worth it to shoot for what is happening.
        1. +1
          2 October 2014 13: 00
          Quote: yu-xnumx
          Thank you, we don’t need this goat. Let it rot where it is now. If it came to life, it would be worth it to shoot for what is happening.

          + + +
          At the UN, Vitaly Ivanovich puts in place the presumptuous!
          1. gjv
            0
            2 October 2014 20: 40
            Quote: Charles_NK
            At the UN, Vitaly Ivanovich ...

            Vitaly Ivanovich, of course a dude and well done, God grant health, to withstand the pressure of these o ... s! But on the whole, everyone is in their place - they rinse a political rag, then tread on it, then they rinse it again - the UN has become, like the Donkey Run in a Circle LLC. The places for making decisions and decisive actions are different.
          2. The comment was deleted.
    7. +2
      2 October 2014 13: 13
      They just announced the second round of the Cold War. As a result of the first, the USSR was destroyed. We now need to focus, and not lose this one. All for this is available.
  2. +12
    2 October 2014 07: 45
    English dog barks - Russian caravan goes
  3. +29
    2 October 2014 07: 46
    This stupid person does not even know that Ukraine is not a member of NATO.
    1. +9
      2 October 2014 07: 58
      Quote: Eragon
      This stupid person does not even know that Ukraine is not a member of NATO.

      He responds to the cries of Wielkopolska and Shprotlandia about "The Russians are coming and now they will kill everyone belay ! "And he answers in the way he is paid.
    2. +11
      2 October 2014 08: 00
      Quote: Eragon
      This stupid person does not even know that Ukraine is not a member of NATO.

      He knows, but it doesn’t matter, as it doesn’t matter that this mongrel blathers.
  4. Alexander67
    +16
    2 October 2014 07: 46
    Hammond, shut up the pedril. And the turn will reach you, bullshit.
    1. Vovanische
      +3
      2 October 2014 08: 43
      Put a minus, the enemies must be respected and we are not in the kindergarten sandbox. Too much honor for a pederast if we pay attention to it, and in a decent society they simply do not give such a hand.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        2 October 2014 21: 54
        Quote: Vovanishche
        Too much honor for a pederast if we pay attention to it, and in a decent society they simply do not give such a hand.

        I do not agree. hi Once again, to indicate to the bugger that his place is in the bucket - God himself ordered!
  5. +13
    2 October 2014 07: 46
    We must be proud that Britain was a leader in imposing far-reaching sanctions, .....

    Not the first century, sharpen a tooth on Russia .... You will be the first to apologize! It’s not possible to sit quietly on the island!
    1. 0
      2 October 2014 10: 04
      They were leaders in the exhaustion of our capital, were the first from where ours began to withdraw capital, and even after that they would not be the first to stink and scream.
  6. +9
    2 October 2014 07: 47
    From where so much agility? In case of conflict, this country is easiest to wipe from the face of the Earth!
  7. +5
    2 October 2014 07: 47
    Come on ....... there was a louder bark, we saw you there!
  8. +12
    2 October 2014 07: 47
    And what - is NATO bad without Crimea, the original Russian land ?!
    Or does NATO need Russia ?!
  9. +23
    2 October 2014 07: 47
    Great Britain "offered Russia investment, trade and partnership," but she "chose confrontation.".... Oh how! ... And so the guys, apparently in your place in Russia, something did not grow together ... If you spray with saliva ...
  10. Vancha
    +16
    2 October 2014 07: 48
    Why, she "Russia" does not want to kneel down. Harmful;)))
    1. 0
      2 October 2014 09: 22
      Of course she’s a woman ... Russia .. there is only one thing BUT this woman with a real male organ under a beautiful dress ... Maybe she won’t be able to enter the very tomatoes.
  11. +4
    2 October 2014 07: 48
    TOTALLY NOT SMART MAN! RUSSIAN MONEY WILL NOT BE SENT THE EXCHANGE IS READY TO BE GOVERNED BY ITS GOVERNMENT
  12. +10
    2 October 2014 07: 49
    ... after a long period of the Cold War, Great Britain "offered Russia investment, trade and partnership" ...
    Yes, we see how these "investments" flow back abroad, pure speculative capital. And the "partnership" was mainly about providing refuge to fugitive oligarchs and terrorists.
    The guys think in terms of the British Empire. Petty mongrels, lost in a flock of NATO ...
  13. +5
    2 October 2014 07: 49
    threatening to introduce new measures in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine.

    Let yourself introduce in one place, measures as an answer winked
  14. +4
    2 October 2014 07: 50
    Does this surprise me alone?
    1. +3
      2 October 2014 07: 59
      Apparently, yes. The rest are already used to and spit on them from the Eiffel Tower. he is like a ball from Prostokvashino, i.e. dunce. it’s just that all NATO and the United States scholars have gotten together from the rapprochement of the Russian Federation and China and are feeling the end is nearing (everyone understands this phrase as he wants). in my opinion this is an ordinary pug, which is yapping on order and for PR.
  15. +7
    2 October 2014 07: 52
    She proposed to Russia with a gentleman’s shoulder, what else can you do in NATO, only to bark at us justifies its worthless existence.
  16. +9
    2 October 2014 07: 52
    You are what a brave father you are, a gay homosexual ...
    They are leaders, and it will come to you leaders (with the letter "p") ...
  17. +4
    2 October 2014 07: 56
    "... That is why we sent our Typhoon fighters to the Baltic and we will do it again, if necessary ..." - and nothing that you should not be there at all, all the same, oral statements about NATO's not expanding to the East is not an empty phrase , the man of honor has long since stopped making such statements.
  18. +4
    2 October 2014 07: 57
    Just yesterday I read what we are bad and does not understand that they want to make us happy.
    And supposedly these are the threats we ourselves think up.
    1. 0
      2 October 2014 08: 24
      That is, they, "civilized", just want to protect us - "barbarians" from themselves? belay... so that we ourselves do not hurt ourselves? No. ... How could Russia live without them for dozens of centuries? wink ...
      You're right buddy, something is clearly wrong here what ...
      In my opinion, someone in the West does not speak much and they are stupidly not allowed to sleep peacefully, for example, our oil and gas Yes ...
      PS. It is high time to build such "defenders" in long slender columns ... Each friend Yes ... and send ... on foot erotic journey laughing They will like it, it's good not to get used to it laughing
  19. +6
    2 October 2014 07: 57
    another hypocritical tv.r with empty empty pathos.
  20. Erg
    +6
    2 October 2014 08: 01
    Sorry for him. Political prostitute. Defecate on it. sad
    1. +9
      2 October 2014 08: 11
      Quote: Erg
      Political prostitute.

      Why a prostitute? All British policy over the centuries is a clear consistent hatred of Russia.
      1. Erg
        0
        2 October 2014 12: 13
        A prostitute. Because the pose in the political lulu was ordered by the client hi
  21. +3
    2 October 2014 08: 03
    The British tried to agree with V.V.P. the lifting of sanctions instead of the interests of Russia in Ukraine, and they waved it in the face, that’s the poison of the poor fellow.
  22. +5
    2 October 2014 08: 04
    That's why we sent our fighters Typhoon to the Baltic Sea and do it again if necessary.

    I haven’t laughed like that for a long time laughing Fighters they sent wassatThey decided to intimidate Russia lol
    Yes PIP your tongue, stiff English moron wassat ... You should already be aware that your dragonflies did not have time to fly to the Baltic, and you were sent SO FAR far along with them, just as you had never dreamed of in a nightmare erotic dream belay
  23. +7
    2 October 2014 08: 04
    We must be proud that Britain has been a leader in imposing far-reaching sanctions.

    The leader has a frame and he introduces heyropa not sickly
  24. frcdkfl047
    +5
    2 October 2014 08: 04
    It's time to stop feeding them, take all the money from Western banks and return to Russia! If the bay means everything is done right comrades!
  25. +4
    2 October 2014 08: 04
    apparently they really do have tobacco! The last rituals of Cameroshka and Hawaiian are already like desperate attempts to delay the inevitable ... it feels like they are calming themselves: "we are still the thickest and strongest! we are fine! we are leaders!" - and everything around is gradually decaying and already beginning to gradually collapse ...
  26. +3
    2 October 2014 08: 05
    Westerners and Philip Hammond in particular make such statements for domestic consumption. For winding Russophobia in Europe. It doesn’t work for us. Because NATO and the principle of collective self-defense helped us in the difficult times of the Cold War So who starts it again?
  27. +7
    2 October 2014 08: 05
    "And we will not allow our NATO allies in Eastern Europe to be intimidated."
    Why intimidate them ?! Shout "scatter!" and the allys are already under the bench ... Think about Scotland, dad, about Scotland ...
  28. +4
    2 October 2014 08: 07
    Insanity grows stronger!
    They really believe what they say!
  29. +4
    2 October 2014 08: 08
    Yes on x .. we turned all your statements. Bark on jackals !!!
  30. +2
    2 October 2014 08: 08
    There is no measure of fear, but you can’t kill a hedgehog with a bare ass ?! Well, if they really ask, I think the GDP needs to stop the withdrawal of capital from Russia. And there we will look at their dollar and euro!
  31. +1
    2 October 2014 08: 09
    And we were so scared, so scared, we started to be afraid right away, don’t scare us uncle, we won’t be anymore. Such figures as this old senile Russia has seen a lot of people in its lifetime and everyone was so scared that Russia frightened them into powder because of fright.
  32. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 10
    Pi ... eat, don’t toss bags ...
  33. +7
    2 October 2014 08: 10
    How did we intimidate the Baltic states? Refused to buy sprats from them? Awesome confrontation. Here you can’t do without Typhoons. The guys from Europe fell into insanity! This is the main threat, thoughtless statements!
  34. +5
    2 October 2014 08: 11
    When, after the elections, such politicians are asked the question: "Do you seriously think THAT?" ... Hypocrisy is the main "merit" of all politicians. Western ones in particular.
    BY THE WAY ..
    In social networks, a quote from an American Marine is very popular: "I would never want the Russians to seriously fight with us. Let it be unpatriotic, but I feel that they will kick our ass".

    Source: http://warfiles.ru/show-69813-ssha-gotovy-k-tretey-mirovoy-s-rf-i-kitaem.html
  35. PiP
    +3
    2 October 2014 08: 14
    The man returned from vacation and just now read all the news three months ago laughing and decided to make a statement. He is not aware that the world "trend" is different, the fight against ISIS, but he is still butting with Russia ... BRAKE!
    1. gjv
      +1
      2 October 2014 10: 17
      Quote: PiP
      The man returned from vacation and had just read all the news three months ago and decided to make a statement. He is not aware that the world "trend" is different, the fight against ISIS, but he is still butting with Russia ... BRAKE!

      Unfortunately, these, if I may say so, people successfully and without hindering the trend and ISIS and the fight with Russia. All over the world they shamelessly organize feuds and sponsor fascism. For a second I won't be surprised if it turns out that he was on vacation with the organizers of this "mistake"
      http://topwar.ru/59425-irakskie-vvs-po-oshibke-sbrosili-prodovolstvie-i-oruzhie-
      boevikam.html
      They call themselves a community, and what is their friendship for the peoples of the world? Together they built a railway in India (in order to take out more of the loot), together they put the Chinese on opium (they could not conquer, so vileness - intoxicate and rob), and the USA is their invention (it was their natives who overestimated the scalps of the Indians - this dollar, and this half a dollar ). Also, surprise will last for 0 seconds if it turns out that the state officials, dropping containers of aid to the Kurdish Peshmerga, do not forget to first (or after) plant ammunition and ISIS. And in Syria, they bomb ISIS terrorists, or rather, they destroy industrial and infrastructural facilities in order to ruin the country. And now they have euphoria - they raised anti-Russian Nazism in Ukraine. And here is the paradox. Everywhere there are proud people, fighters for national democracy, religious and cultural independence. And they fight, fight. And hundreds - tens and hundreds of thousands - millions of corpses. And now someone won, hurray, here it is - national democracy. And soon this "victorious national democracy" sticks to the dollar and the euro, and looks into the mouths of the Americans, and does what they say. And they don't forgive debts. But Russia forgives debts for some reason. And he builds not military bases and opium plantations, but schools, hospitals, power plants. Bad ...
    2. gjv
      0
      2 October 2014 10: 17
      Quote: PiP
      The man returned from vacation and had just read all the news three months ago and decided to make a statement. He is not aware that the world "trend" is different, the fight against ISIS, but he is still butting with Russia ... BRAKE!

      Unfortunately, these, if I may say so, people successfully and without hindering the trend and ISIS and the fight with Russia. All over the world they shamelessly organize feuds and sponsor fascism. For a second I won't be surprised if it turns out that he was on vacation with the organizers of this "mistake"
      http://topwar.ru/59425-irakskie-vvs-po-oshibke-sbrosili-prodovolstvie-i-oruzhie-
      boevikam.html
      They call themselves a community, and what is their friendship for the peoples of the world? Together they built a railway in India (in order to take out more of the loot), together they put the Chinese on opium (they could not conquer, so vileness - intoxicate and rob), and the USA is their invention (it was their natives who overestimated the scalps of the Indians - this dollar, and this half a dollar ). Also, surprise will last for 0 seconds if it turns out that the state officials, dropping containers of aid to the Kurdish Peshmerga, do not forget to first (or after) plant ammunition and ISIS. And in Syria, they bomb ISIS terrorists, or rather, they destroy industrial and infrastructural facilities in order to ruin the country. And now they have euphoria - they raised anti-Russian Nazism in Ukraine. And here is the paradox. Everywhere there are proud people, fighters for national democracy, religious and cultural independence. And they fight, fight. And hundreds - tens and hundreds of thousands - millions of corpses. And now someone won, hurray, here it is - national democracy. And soon this "victorious national democracy" sticks to the dollar and the euro, and looks into the mouths of the Americans, and does what they say. And they don't forgive debts. But Russia forgives debts for some reason. And he builds not military bases and opium plantations, but schools, hospitals, power plants. Bad ...
  36. +2
    2 October 2014 08: 15
    Wouldn't you go mister? You rejoice that typhoons are returning. Or do you think that again the Russians will save you if that? he will be proud ... that you turn into fagots there? please, we will not bother you.
  37. +2
    2 October 2014 08: 15
    damn yes Russia doesn’t do anything against Ukrainians at all, but these are yelling louder and louder, by inertia, only they started to carry them faster and faster !!!!
    1. gjv
      0
      2 October 2014 20: 44
      If by inertia. After all, no, squealing at will!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  38. Starmos
    +2
    2 October 2014 08: 16
    The most adequate response to the NATO paranoids will be "Academician Sakharov's recipe" - the laying of a controlled nuclear land mine of three megatons on the bottom of the North Atlantic - neat between New York and London. Only then these bastards will shut up their bread-makers for eternal times ... President, this must be done ... It is not necessary to blow up - the eternal threat of a terrible end is much more effective than the "local apocalypse" itself. This "operation" will allow already now to talk with the West from a position of strength and dictate to them the conditions for "arranging the world."
    1. 0
      2 October 2014 08: 32
      Interesting topic. Did Sakharov have such a "recipe"?
  39. +2
    2 October 2014 08: 16
    The containment of the striped justifies her pieces of silver. Well bark, bark ....
  40. +11
    2 October 2014 08: 18
    If England squeals .. that means Russia is doing the right thing! We thought with our sanctions we were kneeling well .. You can shout as much as you like, but if you poke your head with us .. we’ll definitely tear your British flag ..! Here's a bit of humor))) wassat
  41. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 22
    Again, as always - the title of the article sounds like "the British minister made a tough statement on Russia", the main message of the minister, they say, "we were advanced and now we will introduce new tough sanctions on Russia in an advanced way." Conclusion: another blather about the unity of NATO and its MEMBERS, about the transfer of UNITS of aircraft to the border with the Russian Federation and about the fact that these units will reflect something there from the east.
    Think about it - this is not an informational occasion; this is yapping again to maintain the staffing of an informational background negative for us. It is necessary to bring down the ruble and lower stock prices by all measures ...
  42. Dbnfkmtdbx
    0
    2 October 2014 08: 22
    I don’t understand why we need to know what the old senile from England said. It’s clear from them that when there was nothing good, I would have completely wiped them off the face of the earth. It’s more interesting to me that friends think about us and not enemies, but I personally don’t want to write about England I don’t give a shit what is going on with gay men and I can’t stand the Beatles
    1. 0
      2 October 2014 08: 41
      the old senile from the United Kingdom does not voice his position and his decisions, but his government. Therefore, you need to listen to them and draw the appropriate conclusions. Well, sending Typhoons to the Baltic (straight to the sea, or what?!) is not even a gesture of despair, it’s SOMETHING.
  43. +2
    2 October 2014 08: 24
    The head of the British Foreign Ministry is a Jewish artist: Sarah, I wanted to send you a ruble, but already sealed the envelope ..
  44. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 24
    Jackal Tobaccos!
  45. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 25
    "Great Britain" offered Russia investment, trade and partnership "

    It is not yet known how much money flowed into this "Great" Britain, I suspect that much more than their investment. And this must be stopped.

    "We will not tolerate illegal actions by Russia. We will not allow our allies to be intimidated," and so on.

    Oh, it's scary how, "Azhno right now, I'll do it."
  46. +1
    2 October 2014 08: 26
    It’s only I see that they’re on the back of all politicians’s faces are terrible, crooked, and some kind of idiotic look.
  47. +1
    2 October 2014 08: 28
    Threats to Russia from the EU and the US are dictated by only one thing: - "... you are to blame for the fact that I want to eat ...".
  48. +1
    2 October 2014 08: 28
    How such pearls touch me "..... made a tough statement ..." And according to the plan of these "tough" guys, we should have been no less "tough about ... be out of fear." dishonor the gray hair of your queen, do not be like ..... (although, what am I talking about?). Uuuh, "formidable English guys", scare Typhoons, well, well. Have you forgotten a story that happened not long ago? whether our cruiser is almost on its shores. ”Their own laughed at you.
  49. +2
    2 October 2014 08: 28
    West comes from rabies. After all, everything that they arranged in Ukraine has to be kept and cleaned by them themselves, but I don’t want to. At the very beginning of the Maidan events, Vladimir Putin said that all the dirt in Ukraine will have to be removed by the one who brewed this mess and attempts to push everything to Russia will not work, and sanctions will not help here. So, gentlemen are good, if you want, you don’t want, but you will have to deal with the right sector, the unfortunate leaders of Ukraine, and the Ukrainian fascists themselves. Otherwise, they will come to your cozy Europe and poke you in trash bins. And for those who did not want to live under the rule of the fascist junta, I mean New Russia, we will certainly help.
  50. +1
    2 October 2014 08: 32
    In short, who in the NATO (NATO) self-harming people will bark. Bark. Ass licking the Main Monkey. They are furious..moralism. Pedalism of inhuman attitude towards Russia. It is high time to send the nuclear-powered iskander.
    1. gjv
      +1
      2 October 2014 11: 13
      Iskanders - tactical, usual range ~ 500 km. This is Berlin (to Potsdam), if launched from the Baltic Spit. To London another 900 - 1000 km further. Mb a new R-500 missile will be reached, but whether it is in service or not is a military secret.
    2. gjv
      0
      2 October 2014 11: 13
      Iskanders - tactical, usual range ~ 500 km. This is Berlin (to Potsdam), if launched from the Baltic Spit. To London another 900 - 1000 km further. Mb a new R-500 missile will be reached, but whether it is in service or not is a military secret.
  51. +1
    2 October 2014 08: 38
    Remember Margaret Thatcher’s statements that 15 million people should remain in Russia to service the pipe, in such cooperation and investment. Neither the Soviet nor the Russian authorities ever allowed themselves to declare peoples enemies.
  52. wanderer_032
    +2
    2 October 2014 08: 45
    Russian, you are only to blame for the fact that we want everything. This is the only way to understand these words, which increasingly began to fly from the West.
    The Saxons need to brazenly set the Borzometer to zero, for at least 100 years.
    And then they completely lost their belts.
  53. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 49
    Well, what a bastard... we won’t tolerate Russia’s threats to NATO members... what kind of nonsense are they talking about, they intimidate themselves, they threaten themselves. Split personality?
  54. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 51
    Because NATO and the principle of collective self-defense helped us through the difficult times of the Cold War and will remain a key principle of our defense policy in the future.

    You'll have to remember the "hard times of the Cold War." I hope that you will never forget them and at night you will shudder from the sounds of airplanes flying over your heads. Keep pots under your beds just in case.
  55. argon
    0
    2 October 2014 08: 53
    On the outside he seems like a kind guy. This is the British way: do nasty things, do dirty tricks and at the same time smile politely.
  56. 0
    2 October 2014 08: 54
    ... "Hammond noted that after a long period of the Cold War, Britain "offered investment, trade and partnership to Russia" ...
    Hey Hammond! Aw, son of a bitch! Investments are billions (trillions?) taken to London and offshore (which, incidentally, is the same thing) by our (actually not ours, but yours) oligarchs? Trade beads for gold? About the “partnership” - this is for Cameron, you will succeed, I’m sure...
  57. denosaur
    0
    2 October 2014 08: 59
    “That’s why we sent our Typhoon fighters to the Baltic and we will do it again if necessary...” - maybe we should send a couple of ISKANDERS there? I think it’s more than enough for their territory....
  58. 0
    2 October 2014 09: 00
    He works off the US stuff (or cookies) and is nothing serious. When thousands of innocent people are being killed in the east of Ukraine, it is silent, but when they kicked the butts of the unbelted pussies, there was a lot of screaming. And against this background, it is impossible to take such passages seriously.
  59. kelevra
    0
    2 October 2014 09: 02
    It’s time for these woodpeckers to understand that they now do not have the same influence and scale of territory as before! We, as before, as now, sneezed at all these bourgeoisie!
  60. ed65b
    0
    2 October 2014 09: 07
    Why does Gazprom sell England the cheapest gas in all of Europe? Why not renegotiate the contract? How long can you listen to bastards from these Mudanjians?
  61. 0
    2 October 2014 09: 09
    Lately, the West has been almost openly threatening us... Well, damn it, we got it! History has taught them nothing. For “Whoever comes to us with a sword...” will receive the same impudent, smoked face!
  62. pahom54
    0
    2 October 2014 09: 14
    "... "We should be proud that the UK has been a leader in introducing far-reaching sanctions that make it clear that...We will not tolerate illegal actions of Russia. And we will not allow our NATO allies in Eastern Europe to be intimidated."

    Russophobic England has never been tolerant of Russia in history... This brings to mind the feeling of inferiority that engulfs the British when comparing themselves with Russians... Prim, dry, cunning 3,14ndoras of the English spill envy the broad Russian soul, maybe fuck it, with with the help of which Russia has always survived all adversities...
  63. 0
    2 October 2014 09: 16
    ...The head of the British Foreign Office made a tough statement on Russia...

    ...and even figured out where to insert it...
  64. 0
    2 October 2014 09: 18
    ... "Hammond noted that after a long period of the Cold War, Britain "offered investment, trade and partnership to Russia" ...
    Hey Hammond! Aw, son of a bitch! Investments are billions (trillions?) taken to London and offshore (which, incidentally, is the same thing) by our (actually not ours, but yours) oligarchs? Trade beads for gold? About the “partnership” - this is for Cameron, you will succeed, I’m sure...
  65. The comment was deleted.
  66. 0
    2 October 2014 09: 24
    The European Union is America's litter!
  67. The comment was deleted.
  68. ISKANDER25
    +1
    2 October 2014 09: 35
    Hello! THEY ARE ALL IN THE SAME WORLD!
  69. 0
    2 October 2014 10: 03
    British scientists have set a strict condition - there will be no winter this year, as this threatens Europe.
  70. Dobrov
    0
    2 October 2014 10: 07
    If it were not for England, there would already be a billion Russian people. These bastards dragged us into bloody wars through intrigue, deception, bribery, and political murders. But now their time is over, we don’t need to be afraid of this shit anymore, and they’re crap on us out of their own powerlessness
  71. 0
    2 October 2014 10: 18
    Anglossssssssaxon creature!!!!!!!!
  72. 0
    2 October 2014 11: 01
    The reasoning of the West is as if we are their slaves and have done something wrong. Now we need to be punished.
    1. 0
      2 October 2014 21: 08
      The words attributed to the great Tyutchev are appropriate here:
      Shut up, shameful Europe
      And do not pump your rights!
      You are just an ass in Russia,
      And you think that the head!
  73. 0
    2 October 2014 11: 27
    He can’t hide his bulldog arrogance under the hem of his queen, he doesn’t have enough sense, GDP is not a drunken Yeltsin, this is not the nineties. Airplanes in the Baltics and 600 gays in uniform are just targets for quick destruction.
  74. +2
    2 October 2014 11: 31
    Great Britain = fascism. This is already an axiom. Scotland was pinned down and glad. Now all forces have been thrown into the fight against Russia. But we will answer them.
  75. 0
    2 October 2014 11: 36
    Foreign Office London
    Dear Mr. Hammond,
    Could we invite you to a long walking erotic trip/ Yours sincerely. MR Club Members
  76. 0
    2 October 2014 11: 42
    I've already peed myself. laughing
  77. 0
    2 October 2014 18: 08
    As always: external respectability with a devilish essence. - Catch and add 5 (five) lashes. Liberals are shitty.