Military Review

The Caspian states have banned outside armies from being in the region

56
Presidential Aide Vladimir Putin Yury Ushakov in an interview RIA News reported that during the meeting of the Caspian Five, fundamentally important agreements were reached. One of them is related to the fact that the countries of the Caspian five have agreed to ban the use of armed forces of extraregional states under any pretexts to carry out actions in the Caspian region.

The Caspian states have banned outside armies from being in the region


The Caspian five includes such countries as the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Iran. During the consultations, which Yury Ushakov called difficult, it was possible to reach a consensus in terms of not allowing armies of outside states to the region. It is reported that such a decision should unambiguously contribute to stability in the region, as well as to strengthening the regional partnership between the countries of the Caspian region.

When the Caspian five speaks of preventing outside states from entering the region, it is absolutely clear which countries are meant. One of these states on the eve declared Russia second in the list of enemies after Ebola fever ...
56 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ISKANDER25
    ISKANDER25 26 September 2014 13: 51
    +41
    Hello! Another kick under the ass of NATO! hi
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 26 September 2014 13: 54
      +33
      The wise decision of the five, does not leave a single chance and loopholes for mattresses. This is a great victory for Russian diplomacy, brave to Lavrov’s department.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. jjj
        jjj 26 September 2014 14: 44
        +5
        And this is against the background of the constant strengthening of the Caspian flotilla. Nicely worked and systematically
    2. DRA-88
      DRA-88 26 September 2014 14: 00
      +6
      A very correct and balanced decision!
      There is nothing for mattresses to do in the Caspian!
    3. comprochikos
      comprochikos 26 September 2014 14: 01
      +7
      Good news. Although the Caspian has no neutral waters and access to the sea. And it is not clear where to get the armed forces of third countries. what
      But their presence will already mean violation of the state borders of the entire five and receiving pindules from it smile
      1. pts-m
        pts-m 26 September 2014 14: 20
        +4
        and this is the case when a party from the above states would allow the use of military flotillas in its waters. Vukria is a clear example for everyone else.
        1. comprochikos
          comprochikos 26 September 2014 14: 27
          +2
          As I did not guess at once. This shtob nobody from a communal apartment decided to invite guests violent to invite? laughing
        2. Vasek
          Vasek 26 September 2014 18: 26
          0
          Quote: PTS-m
          and this is the case when a party from the above states would allow the use of military flotillas in its waters. Vukria is a clear example for everyone else.
          .
          How will these "flotillas" get there? In my opinion, only Russia has access through the Volga-Don to the Azov> Black Sea. And the rest will have to drop other people's "flotillas" from planes? laughing
    4. Juborg
      Juborg 26 September 2014 14: 17
      +3
      Russia has insured itself, from the side of Azerbaijan, for the coming years, as this friend may suddenly turn out to be an enemy, given his rapid rearmament and desire for close cooperation (not being afraid of assimilation) with Turkey, and in the future, joining NATO.
  2. Ilik
    Ilik 26 September 2014 13: 52
    +5
    Well done. Although judging by the latest news, and the fact that our ships are sent to the Caspian longer, they are up to something.
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 26 September 2014 13: 57
      +7
      Quote: Ilik
      We are up to something.


      At the moment, it is probably easier to list the places where they are not up to anything.
    2. Turkir
      Turkir 26 September 2014 14: 46
      0
      When they do not understand the arguments of the mind, power is demonstrated.
  3. igor1981
    igor1981 26 September 2014 13: 54
    +7
    There is really nothing for mattresses and their mongrel to do in the Caspian.
  4. Arh
    Arh 26 September 2014 13: 58
    +1
    get together and drive away these gringos from all over the ball !!!
  5. sever.56
    sever.56 26 September 2014 13: 58
    +5
    It would be nice to prescribe that in the case of an invasion of alien forces, consider this an act of aggression, with the adoption of appropriate retaliatory measures.
  6. Vend
    Vend 26 September 2014 13: 59
    +6
    Damn competently squeeze out bloodthirsty Europeans and those who want to destabilize the situation in the Caspian. They closed the track of NATO. Here is the great news.
  7. RUSS
    RUSS 26 September 2014 14: 00
    +7
    I look at the map of the Caspian and understand, but when it was once the inland sea of ​​Russia ..... Eh ..
    1. Talgat
      Talgat 26 September 2014 23: 21
      0
      Well, the last time is not Russia, but the USSR - and this, by the way, is quite possible in the future, if we pull Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan to our Union (which is possible in principle), and make Iran an ally
  8. Kostyar
    Kostyar 26 September 2014 14: 03
    +2
    Caspian tidbit for the west, did not have time a little ...
    Let the "sniff the cap"!
  9. Wiruz
    Wiruz 26 September 2014 14: 05
    +8
    By the way, huge oil deposits were recently discovered in the Caspian Sea, and so on the 30th of this month, the GDP is going to Atyrau to "share" the field with Nazarbayev. Honestly, I will be glad if Putin takes the entire source under his wing, since Kazakhstan can again stupidly lease the field to all Yankees there good
    1. Semurg
      Semurg 26 September 2014 16: 41
      +5
      Quote: Wiruz
      By the way, huge oil deposits were recently discovered in the Caspian Sea, and so on the 30th of this month, the GDP is going to Atyrau to "share" the field with Nazarbayev. Honestly, I will be glad if Putin takes the entire source under his wing, since Kazakhstan can again stupidly lease the field to all Yankees there good

      If the infa about the deposit is true, it will not be superfluous, if it is shared fraternally, it is also not bad. At the expense of taking under your wing is not entirely clear in the sense of developing yourself? how much do I know oil in our sectors at great depths under high pressure and is chemically aggressive in the Russian Federation or the Republic of Kazakhstan, is there a technology for its production and the corresponding technical equipment? If not, Western technologies and technological equipment of the Russian Federation will not give because of sanctions and the Republic of Kazakhstan is not under sanctions and it might be better for Nazarbayev to take this field under the wing and bypass the sanctions, and you need a lot of money for this field and state banks in Russia are under sanctions. In general, it’s good to organize a joint venture where the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan are the owners of the field, China is a cashier and the main buyer of this oil, Western technology companies and equipment.
      1. Kasym
        Kasym 26 September 2014 17: 53
        +6
        The virus, no need to "drive the wave." Agreement of May 13, 2002 regarding an agreement on joint development of disputed fields. Kurmangazy, Khvalynskoe, Tsentralnoye don't tell you anything? Everything has been discussed and signed for a long time. All parties are happy.
        About the fact that we gave something to foreigners without our interests - there are examples !? And I can give you such an example. Karachaganak. Kazakhstan has 10% of shares. And from this year, 80% of the profits remain in the Republic. How do you like it? The remaining 4 in. participant 20% (including an American company). Do you think our interests and profits have been taken into account? I know they are not happy, but sorry, they signed up. All they have to do is increase the expenditure side, but you can't really increase much - the infrastructure and all that is already there. Semurg is absolutely right about technologies - neither we nor Russia have technologies for horizontal and deep drilling (for this, Exxon Mobil was attracted to the Arctic fields). So it is necessary to attract, and then, with a favorable conjuncture, buy out shares or "wring out" (the experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan is higher than the roof - ecology, missed deadlines, poor performance, etc.). Then, when trial drilling begins, the risks are enormous - all of a sudden "empty", and the costs are made, all of a sudden the wrong reserves, suddenly the wrong conditions of occurrence (pressure, depth) and it is necessary to change the equipment (that is, additional costs). Therefore, ALL states are trying to attract investors in order to share the risks. hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Alibekulu
      Alibekulu 26 September 2014 19: 20
      +4
      Quote: Wiruz
      Honestly, I will be glad if Putin takes the entire source under his wing, because Kazakhstan may again stupidly lease the field to all the Yankees there
      "Women! Marry our men! Support the domestic producer!" (c) Nikolay Fomenko
      That's right, why should the Americans, better help the Russian oligarchs ..
      Vaughn Abramovich, it's time to change the yacht, and Kerimov to buy the London Arsenal.
      And, to be honest, somehow I would not like such "compatriots" negative And then, they are so sincerely indignant at why they are not in the power and power structures ..
      About 10 years ago in Kostanay, in a regional weekly, a columnist wrote, choking with delight, something like this: "Hurray! Hurray!?! Russia is raising the price of gas to Kazakhstan! The Russian Federation is getting rid of freeloaders."
      It was somehow wild to read, since we have half of the Russian speakers. And this higher price, including for them. negative And for the author, the lion's share of the pension, which will go to pay gas bills. And he, later indignant and criticizes the government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, for the widespread increase in prices .. Moreover, among Kazakhs, such statements naturally provoke an extremely negative reaction ..
    4. Talgat
      Talgat 26 September 2014 23: 34
      +2
      About "again it is stupid to lease the field" you got excited

      Of course, there is corruption in the Russian Federation and in our country, but the times of "Kazakhgate" are in the past. Read the Internet, look in recent years, the Kazakhstani government is harshly squeezing out all Western subsoil users who tried to steal profits by driving money into the expenditure part by purchasing elementary things such as paper trays at unrealistic prices, etc.

      Secondly, look at the facts - Russia regained control of oil and began to pay off debts and pay state employees only in 2004 - look at the schedule of the national fund - it’s easy to find on the network (this is when they put Khodorkovsky and returned the Yukos people to Rosneft - before that there’s a hole in the pension fund and in the budget - debts and minus in the national fund

      If Kazakhstan started this business at 4 a year earlier than Russia - at 2000. The National Fund was formed of course after the scandal - but the money went and debts were paid off, etc.
  10. Aldo
    Aldo 26 September 2014 14: 05
    +6
    Correctly, questions on the Caspian should be decided by the Caspian states themselves.
  11. Finches
    Finches 26 September 2014 14: 06
    +2
    The Caspian Sea is a sphere of the everlasting strategic interests of Russia and a direct path of interaction with Iran! Iran, this path is also necessary. It is very good that Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan understood this, I generally am silent about Kazakhstan, a member of the CU!
    Only in this situation will there be success and prosperity for all the Caspian littoral countries, as soon as a pin gets in there .. dos, write is gone! Instead of success and prosperity, the bitter fate of Iraq, Libya, Syria.
  12. Su35
    Su35 26 September 2014 14: 06
    +2
    Correct solution! good
  13. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 26 September 2014 14: 07
    +3
    Long overdue!
    Everyones go around here, and then my spoons disappear! (with)
  14. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 26 September 2014 14: 08
    +3
    Remember the time when there were two masters in the Caspian, the USSR and Iran, now there are three more and everyone has a desire to grab a larger piece of the Caspian’s territory, overpowering the mind.
  15. Militarist
    Militarist 26 September 2014 14: 10
    +3
    I take the hat of the Lord before you !!! hi Bravo! good
  16. Bronik
    Bronik 26 September 2014 14: 15
    +3
    Such a small military block, but with great prospects.
  17. parusnik
    parusnik 26 September 2014 14: 19
    +1
    Psaki will frighten, he will say that the USA sent its 6th fleet to the Caspian Sea ... smile
    1. Ptah
      Ptah 26 September 2014 16: 37
      0
      Then it’s 5 ... But he has the zone of responsibility of the Northwest Indian Ocean, the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea.
      6 is constantly grazing in the Mediterranean ...
      What? For the Caspian, 8 is to create ... belay ** th them!
      And for Aral, they can’t blind an aircraft carrier? wassat
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. rolengou
    rolengou 26 September 2014 14: 20
    +1
    And the ships will be dragged there by land?)
    1. Adilet
      Adilet 26 September 2014 14: 32
      +3
      I don’t know about ships. But the planes will certainly fly there if one of the countries provides them with bases.

      So we need to take this seriously.
  20. Alexander
    Alexander 26 September 2014 14: 21
    0
    The good news, especially after Obama's hamadril speech at the UN
  21. Adilet
    Adilet 26 September 2014 14: 22
    +2
    Russia transports goods through the Caspian Sea to Iran and Syria. Well, you yourself understand what kind of cargo. To maintain peace, so to speak.
    So the Caspian is the only way of life for the Middle East, which is not reachable for the dirty paws of the United States.
    1. Kasym
      Kasym 26 September 2014 20: 23
      +2
      Adilet, there are intentions for the railway. RF-RK-Turkmenistan-Iran. As far as I know, our part is ready. I don’t know about Turkmenistan. hi
  22. novobranets
    novobranets 26 September 2014 14: 22
    0
    Wisely, extraordinary. Instead of ineffective protests, gather your company and show which side the bad uncles want to do. smile And to quarrel with the whole alliance, even NATO will not risk it.
  23. 3vs
    3vs 26 September 2014 14: 22
    +2
    Naglosaksa without soap will fit either through Azerbaijan or by swotting Iran.
  24. cerbuk6155
    cerbuk6155 26 September 2014 14: 23
    0
    In this decision, everyone voted unanimously. And it pleases. good good drinks soldier
  25. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 26 September 2014 14: 26
    0
    Good and wise decision of all countries. Bring it to the attention of minke whales - and at once the activity subsides. And ISIS will no longer be interesting, and not the promotion of democracy back and forth, because - a bummer! Go on ... with democracy and everything else. It is very obviously aimed at this region.
  26. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 26 September 2014 14: 27
    0
    a ban on the use of the armed forces of extra-regional states under any pretext to carry out actions in the Caspian region.
    But is this ban contrary to the principles of the Collective Security Treaty Organization? How to carry out collective defense?
    1. Talgat
      Talgat 26 September 2014 23: 40
      +1
      does not contradict in any way the fact that, if necessary, the CSTO is presented by the Russian Federation and by us. That is, you cannot bring the Belarusians there, for example, or the Kyrgyz, but this is not necessary - I am sure the Russian Federation itself will "perfectly cope" (as Father said during the Georgian aggression)
  27. Shamsik
    Shamsik 26 September 2014 14: 30
    0
    Every day I swim there and would not want to see ships with American, French, and other flags. Fortunately, they do not have access to the Caspian Sea, but just in case, the decision is right.
    1. shasherin.pavel
      shasherin.pavel 26 September 2014 14: 40
      -2
      When there is no access to your ships, you can buy ships of others, if not under the Panama flag, then Iranian or someone else's.
      1. 97110
        97110 26 September 2014 16: 30
        0
        Quote: shasherin.pavel
        if not under the Panama flag, then Iranian or someone else's.

        Confuse ships with ships.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  28. MolGro
    MolGro 26 September 2014 14: 32
    0
    The servant of deception will now withdraw his troops from Agan through Pakistan)))
    Amers will have an adventure road!
    1. Semurg
      Semurg 26 September 2014 16: 49
      +1
      Quote: MolGro
      The servant of deception will now withdraw his troops from Agan through Pakistan)))
      Amers will have an adventure road!

      The northern route is also used by rail from Avgan to Aktau from there to Baku and by rail to Turkey. I think the transit of troops and weapons does not fall under this agreement on preventing the deployment of troops of non-Caspian countries in the Caspian. If this agreement also blocks this transit, then the Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Azerbaijan will not earn on this transit.
  29. Miron64
    Miron64 26 September 2014 14: 33
    0
    That's good, that's fine! Applause! good drinks
  30. Combitor
    Combitor 26 September 2014 14: 36
    +2
    And it would also be nice to accept an agreement that if someone tries to poke their nose into the region in order to bomb the camps of "terrorists" or establish democratic order, everyone en masse to give an immediate forceful rebuff to those who try to do it.
    1. Ptah
      Ptah 26 September 2014 16: 44
      0
      The fact of the matter is that there has never been and never will be a "general osprey." For hydrocarbons do not tolerate community.
      So far, those who have agreed are friends "against their will", before the GENERAL external aggression. But as soon as someone finds something to pick up the other, there will be such a quarrel. I am hinting at Azerbaijan with its close pressure on NATO member Turkey.
      All will be bitten.
      Ideally, most are consolidated around Russia. Iran aside, but not against ...
    2. Talgat
      Talgat 26 September 2014 23: 42
      +1
      in principle, we also agreed on this so that those who like to bomb and do not come at all

      As for the joint rebuff, this is already a military treaty, and Azerbaijan, unfortunately, is not included and will not join the CSTO with us - you know why. In principle, Turkmen can be dragged in with time
  31. JonnyT
    JonnyT 26 September 2014 14: 40
    +1
    Region or state as a whole ?????? muddy wording. It can be considered that the restriction does not apply to the entire territory of the Caspian littoral states. Don’t come to the Caspian Sea, but next to it - please. And another question: Where was NATO going to withdraw its contingent from Afghanistan ????? Isn’t this region an hour ???????? In general, the news is positive! Nothing mattresses poke their nose into someone else's affairs !!!!
    1. Yeraz
      Yeraz 26 September 2014 17: 33
      0
      Quote: JonnyT
      Region or state as a whole ??????

      it’s written that the region can be located in Kaspiin itself. And keep it on its land territory, yes.
      Although here, Azerbaijan seems to have a constitutional ban on the presence of foreign bases.
      Quote: JonnyT
      And where was NATO going to withdraw its contingent from Afghanistan ?????

      To see in Europe, partly home, partly on the way to some countries will be sold.
      Although Hammers even refused to sell the exported equipment to Azerbaijan)))) The law on the prohibition of arms sales to Azerbaijan by the Congress is still strictly observed.
      1. JonnyT
        JonnyT 26 September 2014 19: 37
        0
        that's right .... how long the way home ....... and as for technology, he does not sell a specialist, maybe something will remain in the Ukrainian
  32. zone72
    zone72 26 September 2014 14: 52
    0
    EVERYTHING IS CORRECTLY NOT FUCKED TO DO THOSE FOR WHO THERE IS NO BORDERS
  33. Knizhnik
    Knizhnik 26 September 2014 14: 57
    +3
    NATO, come on, bye!
  34. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 26 September 2014 15: 13
    0
    Correct solution. But it is clearly not like the ubiquitous Nanglo-Saxons and their minions. Now we can expect from these carriers of democracy conclusions about the lack of democracy among a handful of villains living around the Caspian.
    1. Yeraz
      Yeraz 26 September 2014 17: 34
      0
      Quote: x.andvlad
      But the ubiquitous Nanglo-Saxons and their minions obviously will not like it.

      Why don’t you like it ?? They were not going to carry their ships to the Caspian. This applies only to the Caspian itself, this does not apply to the territory of these states.
  35. special
    special 26 September 2014 15: 41
    0
    Quote: Giant thought
    The wise decision of the five, does not leave a single chance and loopholes for mattresses. This is a great victory for Russian diplomacy, brave to Lavrov’s department.

    East is a delicate matter ... The main thing is not to turn on the back ..
  36. sv68
    sv68 26 September 2014 16: 32
    0
    here it’s okay here and the weird-Caspian belongs to five countries and only these armies should be there
  37. mgfly
    mgfly 26 September 2014 16: 51
    0
    in now we go nuts!
  38. crambol
    crambol 26 September 2014 17: 14
    0
    it is absolutely clear which countries are meant. One of such states on the eve declared Russia the second in the list of enemies after Ebola ...


    The article is a definite plus. But an unknown secret author would have rolled in a fat minus, for darkening. It's time to call a spade a spade - a cat a cat, and enemies - America.

  39. mik0588
    mik0588 26 September 2014 17: 46
    +1
    Bravo! Office of Lavrov.
  40. regul10108
    regul10108 26 September 2014 19: 02
    +1
    Another dulia under the nose Pin.dos.tanu! tongue