Robot Guard Samsung SGR-A1 will be on duty in the Korean demilitarized zone

6
A subsidiary of the South Korean company Samsung Group is developing Robot-hour SGR-A1. It is reported that this robot guard has already been tested in a special demilitarized zone, which today separates South Korea from the DPRK. Created by Samsung, the guardian robot is able to detect various targets using a rich arsenal of cameras, thermal sensors and motion sensors.

The main task of creating SGR-A1 is to transfer to it the functions that today are carried out by border guards who monitor the demilitarized zone on the Korean Peninsula. It is believed that the use of robotic guards will help reduce the number of possible victims on the part of South Korea in the event that relations between the two countries unexpectedly become complicated.



The first time the robot guard was introduced to the public in 2006 year. At the moment, this electronic guard, which costs about 200 thousand dollars per unit, has an 5,56-mm machine gun in its arsenal, optionally the robot can be equipped with a grenade launcher. The SGR-A1 border guard robot is able to use its infrared sensors as well as cameras of visible light in order to track a large number of targets.

Robot Guard Samsung SGR-A1 will be on duty in the Korean demilitarized zone


In this case, the robot is controlled by the operator remotely. The person is at a safe distance from the device. According to the developers, the robot guard is able to automatically identify and hit targets at a distance of 3,2 kilometers, he conducts target recognition, the aiming process and its destruction. At this stage, the command to open fire for the defeat is given by the operator of the device. At the same time, when installing SGR-A1 at various points of the demilitarized zone, this robot will not make a distinction between strangers and its own - anyone who crosses a certain line will automatically be recognized as an opponent.

The project, which became known in 2006, has been refined and tested all this time. This model of a robotic device should come to the aid of the South Korean military. The robot will take over the functions of the sentinel. Although the development is still surrounded by a certain veil of secrecy, in the media every now and then leaks some details of the project, which are very few.

The guardian robot or the guard-guard their appearance resembles something model T-1 from the famous movie "Terminator". However, it does not have a chassis and can be equipped with small weapons, as well as a variety of cameras, thermal imagers, motion sensors and even voice recognition system. Such a robotic turret installed in the demilitarized zone should prevent all possible attempts of armed or unlawful penetration by the DPRK.



The robot can perform the same tasks as the border guard, using instead of manpower, which minimizes possible losses in the event of an armed conflict on the border. It is reported that SGR-A1 will be an all-weather robot, which will not be afraid of precipitation and other weather troubles. According to the plans of the South Korean military, modern Samsung military robots will be able to take over the functions of protecting the entire perimeter of the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea. The total length of which is 241 kilometer, and its width - 4 kilometer. This zone officially separates the two warring states from 1953 of the year.

It is worth noting that the South Korean government does not spare money for the creation of promising combat robots that can be used to guard the borders with its northern neighbor. This is partly due to the fact that there is a certain shortage of soldiers in the country. In addition to the robots themselves, Korean engineers are also working on creating a security system that would allow them to provide complete control. But even now, many experts openly say that the proposed voice password recognition system can fail, which can lead to accidents, especially in the early years of SGR-A1. It is about using devices offline without operator control.

This problem with 2013 of the year seriously worries the UN representatives. According to the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial and arbitrary executions of Christophe Heins, the use of combat systems that are able to independently decide on the elimination of the target should be prohibited by law. Currently, SGR-A1 combat turret robots are operated by specially trained operators. But the robot can be configured so that it can independently make a decision about opening fire. Robots are equipped with speakers and microphones. They are able to “call out” the intruder and recognize the password he heard “by ear”. If the password is incorrect, the SGR-A1 robot guard can open fire to kill or use non-lethal means - rubber bullets.



According to Christoph Haynes, robots that can work fully automatically, threaten stability around the world. In addition, such devices simply by their existence create a large number of legal and moral-ethical problems. “A robot cannot have morality, robots are“ immortal, ”so they should not have the right to decide whether to live or die, he says. The specialist expects to convince the UN and the world community to impose a moratorium on the introduction of such systems.

Information sources:
http://gearmix.ru/archives/14836
http://www.3dnews.ru/901800
http://rusplt.ru/policy/boevie-roboty.html
http://www.factroom.ru/facts/45383
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    26 September 2014 09: 36
    Video review - how it works.

  2. +1
    26 September 2014 09: 56
    it seems like raimetal was already offering death towers.
    The main thing is that whoever knows the password is not burry, otherwise Khan laughing
    1. starstreak
      +1
      26 September 2014 20: 25
      In the near future...
      watch from 13:45
  3. -2
    26 September 2014 11: 11
    Class! Useful thing.
  4. +1
    26 September 2014 13: 38
    Well, then, what you need.
    It would still be divided: for example, cameras with brains should be placed separately from the machine gun with drives and disguised. And so that this head could control not just one machine gun or something else, but several.
    Well, or there are several goals and several units of weapons with the ability to coordinate actions if necessary - the failure of one of the communication channels, the enemy’s attack on one of the components, and so on.
    Although it's certainly good. I am sure that all drone drones have on board a program of independent actions in a predetermined territory like "Shoot anything that moves."
    And what is supposedly not ethical and stuff ...
    In this case, the decision is made by specialists who launched this installation in combat mode, but not by itself.
    1. 0
      26 September 2014 14: 54
      Quote: Mestny
      Well, then, what you need.
      It would still be divided: for example, cameras with brains should be placed separately from the machine gun with drives and disguised. And so that this head could control not just one machine gun or something else, but several.
      Well, or there are several goals and several units of weapons with the ability to coordinate actions if necessary - the failure of one of the communication channels, the enemy’s attack on one of the components, and so on.
      Although it's certainly good. I am sure that all drone drones have on board a program of independent actions in a predetermined territory like "Shoot anything that moves."
      And what is supposedly not ethical and stuff ...
      In this case, the decision is made by specialists who launched this installation in combat mode, but not by itself.

      In practice - this is doable; the question rests on the cost, respectively, of efficiency.

      They don’t put such programs on UAVs so that the drone does not spend a modest amount of expensive missiles on anything, it’s easier to hammer a ballistic missile with a warhead cassette. Drones in case of loss of communication (shock), switch to inertial navigation and return to the launch point or a predetermined landing point.
      Reconnaissance UAV, yes, it can act autonomously, "on record."
      1. +1
        26 September 2014 16: 13
        Thanks for the clarifications.
        It was I who got a little excited by introducing a drone with an aircraft gun (s) on board - flying over a given area, and hammering into everything that looks like living ...
        1. -1
          26 September 2014 16: 55
          Quote: Mestny
          It was I who got a little excited by introducing a drone with an aircraft gun (s) on board - flying over a given area, and hammering into everything that looks like living ...


          This is also doable, the question is - why such a drone?
          Cannon armament means working at low altitudes, and as a result, vulnerability to MANPADS.
          Yes, and "hammering everything that moves" in modern conflicts, when the militants are hiding behind the backs of the peaceful, is the shortest path to international anathema. laughing
          And "in an open field" - again, it is easier to cover them all at once with cluster munitions or a salvo of MLRS. request

          Py.Sy. “Such drones will appear when AI vehicles decide to write us all off.” laughing
  5. +1
    26 September 2014 15: 09
    North Korea, when the offensive begins, will drive a herd of stray dogs in front of the army ... that’s as if all)
  6. Analgin
    +2
    26 September 2014 15: 22
    We would have such things-on the border, drug-korovany shoot. After all, you won’t give a robot a bribe, you won’t frighten it, and you don’t have to wait for mercy: if you see it, it will crush everyone, regardless of gender, age, or public merit. Violated the border - consider the dead.
  7. Dmitry24r
    0
    30 September 2014 11: 58
    Killing machine, observant and merciless!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"