Military Review

Scotland referendum - the results are not important

66
How to treat the referendum in Scotland and its results?

For this you need to remember the rules of the game. Recall who is the real head of state, of which Scotland is a part. Part of which wants to stop being part of the population of this country. There is someone else's game, according to someone else's rules, in a foreign field. The outcome of the Scottish referendum on its independence ... Scotland’s independence will not.

In any case. This is not about Scotland. Speech about us with you - speech about Russia.

Scotland referendum - the results are not important


Let me explain.

In the event of a "loss" of the referendum - Scotland, as before, will remain part of the UK. In the case of "win" - its independence will be illusory. Like today's Canada. The fact is that the head of the UK - Queen Elizabeth II ... will remain the head and "separated" Scotland. How today she is the real leader of the "separated" Canada ... Did not know?

Then for you quote from the Constitution of Canada:

"Elizabeth II, by the grace of God, the Queen of Great Britain, Canada and other kingdoms and territories, the Head of the Commonwealth, the Protector of the Faith, Everyone to whom these provisions can have anything to do, Hi."

That's the way - "with greetings."

To be completely precise, the cited document is called the “Proclamation on the Constitutional Act of 1982 of the Year.” And he opens the Constitution of the country of the maple leaf. For those who do not know the structure of this country and thinks that Canada is a democratic republic, I will say straight away that this is not so. Canada is a monarchy. The head of state is the British Queen. Will you say that it is only “for furniture” and “reigns, but does not rule”? Then read the list of powers of the Queen of Great Britain. The heads are not only Great Britain, Canada, and Australia — all 15 states.

- The Queen is the head of state and represents him in foreign relations, if the Prime Minister goes to meet him instead, it is only because the Queen has AUTHORIZED to do it.

- The Queen of Great Britain is the supreme commander of the armed forces, it is she who declares war or makes peace.

- The Queen is the head of the Church of England.

Liberals love to talk about "the separation of branches of power." So in the case of the British (Scottish, Canadian, Australian, etc.) queen, the situation is not at all liberal.

The Queen is the chief executive.
She appoints or removes prime ministers and ministers, as well as all civil servants who are "in the service of Her Majesty."

And she is not obliged to appoint the head of the party that won the elections to the position of prime minister, she can appoint ANYONE. Only by following the CUSTOM that has taken shape over two hundred years, and NOT THE LAW, the leader of the party that won the elections is appointed the monarch as prime minister of Great Britain, and the ministers at his suggestion!

The Queen is the head of the legislative branch. The monarch in Great Britain is part of the parliament along with the House of Lords and the House of Commons. The monarch has the right of absolute veto on any law enacted by the parliament, but the last time this right was applied in the 1707 year, for which he received the nickname “sleeping authority”. Only the Queen has the right to early dismiss the House of Commons, that is, the British Parliament. When elections are to be held, the country's prime minister goes to the queen with a request to dissolve parliament so that new elections can take place. It is possible to offer the prime minister, but only the monarch has authority to dissolve.
The Queen is the head of the judicial system. She can cancel any sentence.
Thus, the Queen of Great Britain heads all three branches of government (executive, judicial and legislative), her powers are limited not by law, but by custom, and the comedy “reigns but does not rule” for the whole world.

At the end of the referendum in Scotland, Queen Elizabeth II will remain the head of Scotland ANYWHERE! Therefore, there is no difference what the outcome of the referendum will be - the Anglo-Saxons will not lose control of Scotland.

The question arises: why does London need to carry out this entire circus with a referendum?

To pave the way for the collapse of states, their fragmentation into small territorial "atoms". They will keep control of Scotland for themselves, but the crushing of all other countries will be “fair”. That is, with the loss of this control from the center. Flemish in Belgium. Then Catalonia in Spain. Who will the newly formed European “countries” be targeting? In the US and the UK? Maybe in China? Or maybe to Moscow? Of course, to Washington and London.

And what is the largest country in Eurasia, which you really want to divide into parts our "partners"? This is us - Russia. The bell tolls on us. The Anglo-Saxons do nothing for nothing. They could kill the referendum in their Scotland at the very beginning, roll them up in the wilds of the bureaucracy. After all, the fate of their country is at stake.

But they hold a referendum. To show the world its “democracy” and then demand, support the holding of such referendums around the world. And above all - in Russia. With any outcome of the referendum - a precedent for its conduct will be created. Therefore, its outcome is not so important as the fact of its implementation.

What should be the position of the patriot of Russia in this case?

Very simple:

As a patriot of Russia, I oppose everything that weakens Russia. Therefore, I am categorically against the referendum on secession from Russia.

What about Scotland? And let Scotland decide itself. Or rather, let those who brewed this mess decide in London.

This is not our game.

PS As a humor, who decided to hold such a fateful referendum and why ... on Thursdays, and not on a day off? An interesting experience, I do not understand why the liberals do not demand to use it in Russia?
Author:
Originator:
http://nstarikov.ru/blog/45188
66 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Michael_59
    Michael_59 20 September 2014 14: 45
    +21
    It was necessary for the Scots to use the existing advanced experience of the Crimeans - they would call "polite people" - everything would work out ...)))
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 20 September 2014 14: 50
      +8
      And the author does not look for roundabout ways:

      And what is the largest country in Eurasia, which you really want to divide into parts our "partners"? This is us - Russia. The bell tolls on us. The Anglo-Saxons do nothing for nothing. They could kill the referendum in their Scotland at the very beginning, roll them up in the wilds of the bureaucracy. After all, the fate of their country is at stake.


      Is there really such a multi-level multi-path? Old men zhhot, although not for me to judge what
      1. Nevsky_ZU
        Nevsky_ZU 20 September 2014 14: 59
        +14
        I think it’s simpler, England has pushed as far as possible the idea of ​​Scotland’s independence, so to speak again in a long box. Let off steam. The fact that they could falsify, I admit.
        1. Eggor
          Eggor 20 September 2014 19: 21
          +6
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          The fact that they could falsify, I admit.

          It seems to be so:

        2. Kindof
          Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 25
          +5
          In favor of the conspiracy thesis is this:
          The referendum in Scotland was announced about a year ago
          Have you heard anything about the patriotic upsurge in Wells about the separatist mood in Northern Ireland ???
          And these are the same colonized Celts who at the genetic level do not digest the Anglo-Saxons
          That is, for the whole year, it’s not just that they didn’t hint at the referendum, but not one nat-patriotic politician loomed on the horizon
          And these are the Irish - those who, not so long ago, defended independence from bicycle Britain with weapons and bombs
          I will not say that I specifically followed these regions, but there was nothing in our news
      2. Bro 3-12
        Bro 3-12 20 September 2014 16: 09
        +20
        This is his (Starikov's) position clearly expressed, he has been working in this direction for a long time, follow the link and look at the site, books written by him.
        I had to listen to his conversation with the Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation V.R. Medinsky and the announcement of the book “Who finances the collapse of Russia. From the Decembrists to the Mujahideen. "

        Anyone interested can give a conversation link.

        Article plus, I agree with the position of the author!
        1. Michael_59
          Michael_59 21 September 2014 06: 56
          0
          Quote: Bro 3-12th
          I can give a link

          We ask, we ask!
      3. Sailor
        Sailor 20 September 2014 16: 45
        +10
        England is the progenitor of such multi-ways, I completely agree with the author. This is a direct poke to us.
        1. RUSS
          RUSS 20 September 2014 17: 21
          -10
          Quote: Sailor
          England is the progenitor of such multi-ways, I completely agree with the author. This is a direct poke to us.


          What if Britain suddenly becomes a republic tomorrow? Also poking us, under the "tsar" Putin conceived? laughing
        2. Nick
          Nick 20 September 2014 17: 56
          +4
          Quote: Sailor
          England is the progenitor of such multi-ways, I completely agree with the author. This is a direct poke to us.

          This poke can have a side effect. EU disintegration, for example, recall what is happening in Spain in connection with Catalonia. Yes, and in the US with Texas there are questions ... wink
      4. RUSS
        RUSS 20 September 2014 17: 19
        -8
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Old men zhhot, although not for me to judge


        The author really wrapped up, one can only envy his fantasies.
        1. Nick
          Nick 20 September 2014 18: 00
          +3
          Quote: RUSS
          The author really wrapped up, one can only envy his fantasies.

          Although the thoughts of Starikov are similar to conspiracy theories, but in the IMHO article there is also a rational kernel ...
          1. DV69
            DV69 20 September 2014 18: 23
            +2
            Quote: Nick
            Quote: RUSS
            The author really wrapped up, one can only envy his fantasies.

            Although the thoughts of Starikov are similar to conspiracy theories, but in the IMHO article there is also a rational kernel ...


            The article contains only facts. And fantasy, it is a constitutional monarchy in a country (Great Britain) in which there is no constitution.
      5. Vorlon
        Vorlon 20 September 2014 18: 26
        +2
        Is it really such a multi-level multi-path? Old men zhhot, although not for me to judge what
        Mnogokhodovka such that neither you, nor me, nor Starikov can be judged by the future years. An example before the eyes. Avsro-Hungarians began 150 years ago. Now we are reaping the benefits in the Donbass. There are no beginners. But the business lives on.
        1. Kindof
          Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 27
          0
          As General Petrov said: it’s hard for us to imagine, but someone has a 50-year planning horizon
      6. Vorlon
        Vorlon 20 September 2014 18: 26
        0
        Is it really such a multi-level multi-path? Old men zhhot, although not for me to judge what
        Mnogokhodovka such that neither you, nor me, nor Starikov can be judged by the future years. An example before the eyes. Avsro-Hungarians began 150 years ago. Now we are reaping the benefits in the Donbass. There are no beginners. But the business lives on.
      7. Kindof
        Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 15
        +1
        Starikov’s version of the multi-path is very consistent
        For example, can someone present imagine that the works of British scholars are the theoretical platform of applied fascism in Germany and the lynching ships in Shsha?
        The origins of racism and Nazism in social Darwinism.

        So British scientists are only publicly known as "British scientists" wassat
        But in fact - the office writes
      8. Kindof
        Kindof 21 September 2014 02: 19
        0
        One day...

        Scotland lost to you?
        Queen is optimistic?
        That Wang said in two))
        Separatism is still slurping!

        Referendum do not forget
        Anglo-Saxons, your mother!
        Polite people soon
        They will come to vote for you

        Celts in noble anger -
        Like wasps under the hem))
        So the Anglo-Queen
        Buy Validol

        Such a scenario has been invented:
        Russia put on the British flag,
        But the liberal serpentarium,
        Remember the times of the Gulag

        Self-rolling, saw "Friendship",
        Barracks spirit (flatulence)
        For creativity - what you need!
        Will instantly return patriotism

        Makarka for distraction
        He was thrown into the sacrifice of the people -
        Just a scapegoat
        Big fish hid in silt ((

        Hostile winds blew out
        AK to collect as - do not forget
        But now the word is stronger than a bullet
        You are vigilant, comrade be!

        Donbas burns - executioners there
        I want "Quiet Don"
        Still was read by young people
        It is impossible - that it was repeated!
        (C)
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 20 September 2014 15: 02
      +6
      The administrative resource of London turned out to be more effective than the appeals of the patriots of Scotland to secede from the UK.
      1. Daniel
        Daniel 21 September 2014 02: 16
        0
        Quote: Giant thought
        London administrative resource turned out to be more effective than calls patriots of Scotland about secession from the UK.

        The most interesting thing is that these patriots, despite the defeat in the referendum, still won. Having retained all the advantages of being Scotland within the UK, they gained wider powers, an additional lever of pressure on London and control over resources.

        LONDON, 19 September. / Corr. ITAR-TASS Alan Badov. British Prime Minister David Cameron invited Scottish nationalists to participate in negotiations to continue the process of transferring powers to regional authorities in the UK. The head of the British government said this, commenting on the results of the referendum on Scottish independence, which was won by supporters of British unity.
        ...
        The Prime Minister also said that the decision to expand the powers of the Scottish authorities will have to be made by the new composition of the British Parliament, which will be formed following the election in 2015. In addition, the prime minister promised to grant greater powers to Scotland, as well as to Wales, England and Northern Ireland. He noted that his government would fulfill its obligations to transfer new powers to the Scottish Parliament in the areas of taxes, budget spending and social security.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. AVV
      AVV 20 September 2014 15: 16
      +10
      However, the same ub.lyud.ki referendum of the Crimea and New Russia will not recognize, again double standards, so that let them do whatever they like, but let them not climb to us !!!
    5. armageddon
      armageddon 20 September 2014 19: 08
      +1
      The article is good! But despite all the legal incidents, the British have stirred wildly !!! Laws can be revised ... Still, it is a pity that Scotland remained in the UK !!! But as if there was a pleasant slap in the face to the West !!!
    6. rodevaan
      rodevaan 21 September 2014 08: 02
      0
      Oh, but sorry anyway! It would be nice to crush them. But this requires poor living conditions. And Scotland lives well, they have nothing to complain about. Therefore, the chances were illusory.
      But anyway - 45% is not so bad - a good start has been made anyway! I am sure the next time the result will be different! And at the same time it is a good impetus for the collapse and tearing of the whole Geyes ...
      There Catalonia will also be raked, and the Basque country, Corsica, - and I think the Confederates in the USA will raise their heads above them! Well, we’ll try to help them with this. AND WORD AND BUSINESS!
  2. Carlos
    Carlos 20 September 2014 14: 49
    +12
    I believe Starikov, intelligently and informatively write. I recommend reading his book.
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 20 September 2014 17: 23
      -11
      Quote: Carlos
      I believe Starikov, intelligently and informatively write. I recommend reading his book.


      An old man is an ordinary person who believes in conspiracy theory, everywhere he seems to be intrigues of the Great Game and the World Conspiracy, in short an alarmist.
  3. Volozhanin
    Volozhanin 20 September 2014 14: 51
    +5
    In short, Baba Lisa steers.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. viacheslav77
    viacheslav77 20 September 2014 15: 08
    +7
    I disagree. Any referendum in the RF will be FOR "within the RF". In the current situation, I can’t even come close to imagining a single region that would come out. Even a referendum for joining the Russian Federation is more likely. There are precedents, I will not point a finger.
    The most separatist referendum was in Chechnya, the outcome is known. Where are these mythical separatists?
    1. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 20 September 2014 18: 08
      +2
      You have probably forgotten that the President of Tatarstan announced his separation from Russia? They persuaded him with threats of a "Leningrad" blockade. Calmed down. Now there is a den of Islamists. Soon they will raise their heads and begin with the massacre of the Russians and the unwanted.
      1. Makosha
        Makosha 20 September 2014 19: 42
        +2
        Quote: Алексей_К
        Now there is a stash of Islamists.

        Moreover, they are also pulling Russians into Islam. And preferences in Islam are enough for them. At least an Islamic bank. All loans are interest-free, but only for Muslims. For "kafir" - only with the guarantee of Muslims.
        But an Islamic bank is something that the Russian people cannot oppose. And there is something that can - community, community. Joint holding of various events, involving clergy and neighbors of other faiths and nationalities. They do this, they spend holidays openly, in the yards, in a communal way, but we do not. Thus, they conquer space, territory, and we lose.
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 20 September 2014 15: 29
    +5
    Such a referendum is unlikely. But! Ears on the top of the head. It is worth relaxing and tearing.
  7. Anton Gavrilov
    Anton Gavrilov 20 September 2014 15: 38
    +2
    But in fact it is!

    Well, as for us, in my opinion, it will be very difficult to rock our society and create such chaos as in the next years. We have all seen enough, read and heard enough about what the coup d'etat shines, and indeed in our country there are no fundamental contradictions in Ukraine, there are western and eastern regions, like 2 of different worlds in general!
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 05
      +1
      To prevent this from happening - you have to work
      To all of us
      To carry knowledge to the masses, conduct educational program, teach people to critically perceive information and analyze what is happening

      I do not share optimism - talk outside the forum - be surprised
      In the photo - a shelf with sweets Gutted in one of the shops of Peter (made the day before yesterday)
      The feeling that for someone what is happening in Ukraine is somewhere in a parallel universe
  8. Chaika
    Chaika 20 September 2014 15: 51
    +1
    But they are holding a referendum. To show the whole world its "democracy" and then demand, support the holding of such referenda around the world. And above all, in Russia.
    The fifth column can, of course, "rock" the peoples of Russia along ethnic lines. In Siberia, in the 90s, the Yakuts and Buryats were "rocked", and very
  9. surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 20 September 2014 16: 20
    +4
    The fifth column can, of course, "rock" the peoples of Russia along ethnic lines. In Siberia, in the 90s, the Yakuts and Buryats were "rocked", and very

    I am touched by the dreams of the ukrosvidoms that Russia will crumble as soon as the regions begin to demand autonomy from the "Putin regime." They are inventing the "Ural Republic", "Far Eastern partisans", etc. Definitely, it will not work. All Yakuts, Buryats, as well as in Moscow, also have their own "belolentochniki". But they don't make the weather. Mattress-makers know this, the national card cannot be played. Therefore, the main efforts on the socio-economic component, sanctions are evidence of this.
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 30
      0
      It will start corny with everyday life: "oh, prices are growing, Novorossia is being drained, our richest region is transferring money to the budget to the federals, while corrupt officials do not pay pensions to pensioners .."
  10. andrew42
    andrew42 20 September 2014 16: 27
    +11
    Very similar to the truth. Earlier I already noted for myself that no particular acuteness of relations between the organizers of the referendum and London politicians was observed. In theory, for one such sane attempt to organize a real separation, London would instantly sentence the initiators to death. And don't talk about "political culture". This culture has been known to everyone since the Kennedy assassination. And times are steeper, more serious, more sophisticated methods. They killed for less. And here it’s peace and quiet, the leaders of the "department" bloom and smell. And the British prime minister bleats "I'll be upset if .." It really smells like a performance. The article is a definite plus. Thoughtfully.
  11. parusnik
    parusnik 20 September 2014 16: 49
    +1
    And really, it doesn’t matter .. but nevertheless ... a negative result is also a result .. The British will now pay more attention to what’s going on, and not to others ..
  12. lance
    lance 20 September 2014 17: 56
    +2
    Scotland must live in this world sanglia. met with those and others. see how the Scots communicate with us - as equals. and how English through the lip. and a referendum, with the unity of England, our win. Russia must understand and otsunit- live from the opposite.
  13. Oml
    Oml 20 September 2014 18: 11
    +3
    England will soon become an Islamic state. Sharia patrols are already hosting there. Yes, these puppets sysha right.
    1. Makosha
      Makosha 20 September 2014 19: 29
      0
      Quote: OML
      England will soon become an Islamic state. Sharia patrols are already hosting there.

      What is the reason for this from us? Do you really want to strengthen the Islamists in Europe?
  14. Zomanus
    Zomanus 20 September 2014 18: 26
    +2
    Why would Scotland be allowed to separate? 7 A joke of humor. They’ll rather flood the whole territory with napalm. The only thing that Scotland can achieve is a certain number of nishtyaks.
  15. Selevc
    Selevc 20 September 2014 18: 27
    +2
    The so-called referendums are held in the West with specific goals: Firstly, to reduce the degree of dissatisfaction in the regions with the policy of the center, secondly, to lower separatist sentiments in individual provinces and to lower the rating of politicians who have promoted the idea of ​​"enough for us to feed the rest at our own expense" important is to show the whole world "the highest level of the Anglo-Saxon model of democracy" and then persuade other countries to follow this path ...
    But the most important thing is that while making a lot of noise around the referenda, the Western media almost do not mention a word how the votes are counted in the regions where referendums are held ... Naturally in the UK, neither the UN nor the OSCE or other international organizations are allowed to vote counting ... Therefore, as Comrade Stalin said, the winner is not the one who voted for the majority but the one who counts the votes !!!
  16. zen-do.ru
    zen-do.ru 20 September 2014 18: 39
    +4
    A possible separation of a Tatarstan is our modern joke.
    The ancestors of the Russians lived in Tatarstan for at least 5 thousand years. Google "Fatyanovskaya culture" or "haplogroup R1a". And the Tatars are less than 800 years old. Therefore, "Tatarstan", "Chuvashia" and others are just places in Russia. Many different peoples live there, but this is Russia, not something else.
    We must remember the story if we do not want us to be stabbed again and again.
    By the way, Russians - according to the Finnish journalist who wrote a book about Russians (partially true) - remember their history relatively well and honor it. (Compared to Westerners yes ) So that.
  17. Altona
    Altona 20 September 2014 19: 04
    +1
    A referendum with migrant workers is not a comme il faut ... Highlanders from Glasgow beat pro-British today, take weapons and kill them tomorrow ... Scotland is independent!
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 20 September 2014 23: 26
      0
      How strange is the formation in the army in the British, or did they, with their democracy in the army, twitch completely or cannot be built in growth? laughing recourse laughing
    2. saygon66
      saygon66 21 September 2014 18: 49
      +1
      - The Scottish Guard Dragoons courtiers ... A unit with a historical connection with the Russian Empire! To this day in the officers' meeting of the regiment the hymn "God Save the Tsar ..."
      Emperor Nicholas II. Chef of the Scottish Gray Regiment in the regiment's uniform
  18. avia1991
    avia1991 20 September 2014 19: 21
    +1
    I put the article "plus" for an excursion into the theory of the state world order: in ordinary life, most of us do not think about such questions wink
    As for the referendum in Scotland - it was carried out in order for the opposition to "let off steam" and for nothing else! For, as Comrade Stalin correctly said,
    Quote: Selevc
    - not the one who voted for the majority wins the election, but the one who counts the votes !!!
    And the outstanding ratio of "for" and "against" - 45 to 55% - should sweeten the supporters of independence the bitterness of defeat, and raise their egos.
    I believe that the referendum in Donetsk and Luhansk regions can serve as an example of an "honest" referendum, but also in quotation marks, because in reality it was getting in the way, and the organizers, for their part, tried to ensure the preponderance.
    Well, about the division of Russia - yes, of course, there are more than enough people willing to divide it! Among the polit and economist "elite" .. For the first time we could observe this in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, when a huge country was "taken away" into principalities. But the guys dreaming of "a small country of their own" will have to ask the peoples of Russia! And in today's situation .. for me, this is a "post-revolutionary situation": as soon as the oligarchs rock the boat, the people will go to dispossess them! And nationalize the "privatized" enterprises .. wink
  19. MAX2014
    MAX2014 20 September 2014 19: 57
    +3
    I, of course, DRUM what's up with Scotland, but I would like to look at Cameron's thrill if the Scots chose independence.
    1. Antiaircraft gun
      Antiaircraft gun 21 September 2014 03: 44
      0
      Well, Cameroon kind of fluttered! even before the referendum made bricks ...
  20. TAMERLAN 7
    TAMERLAN 7 20 September 2014 20: 04
    +4
    And here I am for example - upset! So many centuries of struggle for the independence of Scotland, and when it is already so close - to sell everything for an imaginary well-being. After all, it’s still the European Union! Hmmm, the Scots did not take revenge on the British. Theirs is their business, but what would be the stingy and arrogant English in the teeth? Just imagine !!! wassat And then - Wales !!! Beauty! Scots have failed!
    But it seems to me and the British have secured themselves! What do you think?
    1. Militia
      Militia 21 September 2014 00: 01
      +3
      Yes, 55% of the Scotlans have corrupted. It's a shame. They probably decided that it is better on a short leash, but well-fed than without a leash but hungry. It seems that the next generation of Scots will curse those who voted today for this weakness. So much blood has been shed over the centuries in the wars for this independence. And here, so she was close, and .... the card went wrong.
    2. Kindof
      Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 35
      +4
      This only once again confirms the postulate: you can only take power, freedom - only win
      And democratic institutions are a scam
  21. delorian
    delorian 20 September 2014 20: 09
    +2
    The administrative resource of London turned out to be more effective than the appeals of the Scottish patriots to secede from Great Britain. Plus, many of the benefits that London promised!
  22. sanyavolhv
    sanyavolhv 20 September 2014 20: 30
    -3
    health
    the whole article distorts the facts. all facts are distorted. about the role of the PARLIAMENT AT ALL NOTHING. the author either does not know the history of England or he likes to create enemies out of the blue.
    the queen, of course, is the head of everything and everything. but if she does something wrong she will be put into place very quickly.
    there is such a thing as komon velf world, who are interested in taking an interest. DO NOT BELIEVE ON ANY word.
    Well, so .... Of course the English lion is old and parts of it themselves fall off. this is exactly what the referendum showed. Of course it’s good that Unicorn (Chatlandia) didn’t fall off from England; this does not mean that the lion is strong, it means that a horse with a horn on its forehead is not strong enough. about the loss of the crown by the queen, in England only the lazy did not write ...
    ps how zadolbali people who need HATE !!!!! CREATE (BY MY) YOU NEED A KIND. there’s enough hatred in the world, the only thing the USA is doing is breeding hatred. So the author creating hatred helps exactly the American pri ..
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 46
      0
      Well, when was the last time "put in place"? When was Charles 1 executed?
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. PATTIY
    PATTIY 20 September 2014 22: 02
    0
    "... and then demand, support the holding of such referendums around the world. And above all - in Russia .." - author Nikolai Starikov.
    Europe is not a decree for us! They have their own road - to hell!
    We have our own - with God!
    because:
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 37
      0
      The picture is missing:
      choose God!
  25. Ishinomaki lie
    Ishinomaki lie 20 September 2014 22: 22
    0
    And here I am, as soon as I heard about the Scottish referendum, I immediately felt that it was a stone in our garden. Can't ... calm down. I don’t want to worry about the splits of my Motherland anymore, I just want to live to see the day when the states and shaves get what others are happy with ...
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 21 September 2014 00: 39
      +1
      This referendum was scheduled before the Olympics.
      I agree with the author - it will be significant with Catalonia and Venedo
  26. krivdaSPb
    krivdaSPb 21 September 2014 00: 49
    +1
    A formal referendum, formally came to a vote, formally summed up ...
  27. Nataliya
    Nataliya 21 September 2014 01: 29
    +2
    A brief summary of the Scottish referendum.

    Again everything froze until dawn.
    Only a banshee will conquer at times.
    And as if in the North somewhere
    Rob Roy plays the bagpipes.

    London sleeps peacefully until morning.
    Jack habitually gutting people.
    Rob Roy has not mastered the independence ..
    Here is such a Brave Hart.
    Fakin shit.

    Nikolay Shelepov

    Well, the anecdote to the topic:

    - Why are you wearing a skirt?
    - This is not a skirt, this is a kilt! Kilt means that ...
    “I saw how your referendum ended.” So this is a skirt.
  28. Antiaircraft gun
    Antiaircraft gun 21 September 2014 03: 36
    +1
    Why are Scotland so preoccupied? Spit on them, all the same, not friends !!! And moonshine is better at US and not only it drinks
  29. tanit
    tanit 21 September 2014 05: 04
    0
    Well, then, they came out, became apparent, received promises for various buns and cookies. Muffin will not come out again, only more angry and less gullible.
  30. Hecto
    Hecto 21 September 2014 06: 12
    0
    Quote: ZenithKa
    Why are Scotland so preoccupied? Spit on them, all the same, not friends !!! And moonshine is better at US and not only it

    Same opinion smile
  31. EvgenSad
    EvgenSad 21 September 2014 09: 38
    0
    Russia has a federal structure. And according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, not a single subject of the federation can separate from Russia.
    For example: a family of three lives in an apartment, and one of them decides to "separate". He takes one room for himself, puts a second refrigerator, but he cannot do anything else with his room without the rest of the family. And nobody exempts him from paying for utilities.
  32. wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 21 September 2014 10: 07
    +1
    I agree with the author of the article.
    Because lovers of any reforms "over the hill" stupidly begin to copy everything after them like monkeys.
    But referenda in Crimea and the Donbass took place before the Geyropaic ones and on this basis it can be said that there are major problems in the geyropa with democracy.
    In fact, 23 years after the collapse of the USSR, the results of democratic reforms in Russian society yielded more results than in any European country over a longer period.
    Therefore, we can safely talk about this, whoever and what of the so-called Western "partners" of Russia does not speak, considering Russian citizens as backward Neanderthals.
    And so let the brazen Saxons and mattress makers wipe out their teachings to us Russians, how to live, and go with their "advice" how to build democracy in Russia to a bad mother to slurp cabbage soup with muds.
  33. SveTok
    SveTok 21 September 2014 14: 56
    0
    This referendum to the British is still an auknitsa, it will not seem enough.
  34. Aleksey888
    Aleksey888 21 September 2014 20: 50
    0
    Quote: Bro 3-12
    This is his (Starikov's) position clearly expressed, he has been working in this direction for a long time, follow the link and look at the site, books written by him.
    I had to listen to his conversation with the Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation V.R. Medinsky and the announcement of the book “Who finances the collapse of Russia. From the Decembrists to the Mujahideen. "

    Anyone interested can give a conversation link.

    Article plus, I agree with the position of the author!

    In my opinion, the author’s position is at least strange. Maybe I don’t know something. So explain who is going to separate from Russia? Only the reality is that Scotland was not bombed for the referendum. But the DNI and the LC are bombed, so far. And the trick is that everyone is afraid (the EU and other sniffers) that they will just be reunited with Russia. And if Ukraine had not bombed them, oh, I really doubt that they would want to leave Ukraine. But if Scotland bombed .....