Transportation of equipment in the aircraft C-17

Comments

[Andrey Yuryevich]

that’s what Americans are strong in because they can make a show out of everything ....

[igor67]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

that’s what Americans are strong in because they can make a show out of everything ....

All that Yuryevich took out of the pictures? And about the reasonableness, standard mounts, various types of military equipment, remember they packed 24ki, they shot down lodgements from the boards so that they would put a turntable.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: igor67

And about the reasonableness, standard mounts, various types of military equipment,

As I recall the twist of the six for mounting the equipment on the railway, I will flinch. Immediately drew attention to convenient and quick fasteners.

[cosmos111]

Quote: igor67

24ki were packed, lodgements were knocked down from planks, so that they would put a turntable.

what boxes ???? 24 transport Without any boxes ...

[77bob1973]

Yes, the US flag to the trunk of the tank is the main thing ...

[A1L9E4K9S]

Well, I think our Ruslan is no worse than this American.

[avt]

Quote: A1L9E4K9S

Well, I think our Ruslan is no worse than this American.

You mean something else, vis-a-vis 124 - C-5 Galaktika, here it is definitely weaker than Ruslana, well, at least because, unlike him, the airfield is capable of accepting little, the Ruslam will be more passable, although it is also not a gift for airfield concrete .And that's why they made the 17th, well, and in the future replacement of the 141th. , now the 76th will play pranks , but this is not a full-fledged analogue.

[saturn.mmm]

Quote: A1L9E4K9S

Well, I think our Ruslan is no worse than this American.

Slightly different classes.
Undoubtedly, American designers carefully studied the Ilyushin Design Bureau aircraft, borrowing a number of important features from it. Like the IL-76, the American machine can be operated autonomously for a long time, at airfields that do not have special equipment.
It must be compared with the IL-76 and the latest American modification is not inferior to the IL-76
An-124 Ruslan should be compared with the C-5A / C Galaxy, but here the Americans still have to work hard.

[MAX2014]

C-17 workhorse of the US Air Force Tipo Russian IL-76.

[Mature Hrych]

How much do two Abramsy weigh without dz and additional reservation? I would like to watch a video of him bursting with such a load on take-off ...

[And Us Rat]

Quote: Hard Hrych

How much do two Abramsy weigh without dz and additional reservation? I would like to watch a video of him bursting with such a load on take-off ...

[Mature Hrych]

Judging by the small run-up and the steep corner of the climb, it is more likely empty than full ....

[Mature Hrych]

So the IL-76 takes off with a load !!

[studentmati]

Quote: Hard Hrych

So the IL-76 takes off with a load !!

Well done guys! Professionals! It is your duty, your profession! Thanks you!

[voyaka uh]

Max performance - in translation "full load"
As you can see, Amer with two tanks took off easily, like a bird.

[Petergut]

Quote: voyaka uh

Max performance - in translation "full load"
As you can see, Amer with two tanks took off easily, like a bird.

Oh oh With tanks and such a rise and turn? There are big doubts.

[Mature Hrych]

Translation in general is maximum productivity (literally), and in this case traction. Maximum traction.

[saturn.mmm]

Quote: Inveterate Hrych

How much do two Abramsy weigh without dz and additional reservation? I would like to watch a video of him bursting with such a load on take-off ...

Two "Abrams" are with almost empty tanks. Take off and land.
The latest version has a maximum of 78108 kg of cargo, standard - 56245 kg

[Do not care]

The photo with 2 Abrams is clearly not a C-17. He has a maximum of 77 tons. Only Galaxy can handle them. And the interior lining of the cockpit is very different from other pictures.

[Mature Hrych]

Here ... in this campaign and the whole catch ... I think the nifigase Hercules)))

[saturn.mmm]

Quote: Do not care

The photo with 2 Abrams is clearly not a C-17. He has a maximum of 77 tons. Only Galaxy can handle them.

I am also inclined to this opinion, in the picture with 2 Abrams there are not even landing armchairs.
Photo of the Galaxy womb.

[sabakina]

If they also landed, it would be cool .. And so-talk show ...
And yet, they noticed that the technique is clean, not a speck of dust. But in reality, as it will be, especially now, in the late autumn .... They are used to fighting with the pupils in the tropics. Would we land it on our primer and see how much time they would wrinkle?

[abdrah]

"Would we land him on the dirt road and see how long they will squirm?"
- God forbid, but bastards will land - experience and equipment are available in bulk. At the expense of the "Landis" collapsible airstrips, of which there are still fences in the space from Brest to Moscow, recall? -
That’s what’s more modern-

http://www.euronato.com/articles/vremennoe_bystrovozvodimoe_dorozhnoe_pokrytie_f
aun_trackway /
(space in the word f aun remove)

and here is a prototype for fences ...

[pv1005]

Isn't Kildin in the photo for an hour?

[Nitarius]

With regards to fasteners, etc., YES there is something to borrow ... THEY ARE STOPPED PONTAL BRIDGES with us and Vasya don’t mess up ... which prevents us from pulling them ...
CHINA won’t disdain with anything ..and nothing

[PeaceByForce]

Abrams has a panorama on the left, so does the commander sit on the left?

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: igor67

All that Yuryevich took out of the pictures?

just stated a fact ...

[Turkestan]

Looked at BEAUTIFUL pictures. And what is the trick? See how military equipment is loaded and moored !!!!!!!!!!!

[Yutas]

He flew the IL-76 more than once. I doubt that he is in any way inferior. Well, maybe for fasteners. But - when I saw with my own eyes the AN-224 "Mriya" landing ... Standing Boeing-747 seemed like a squad in comparison with it.

[Turkestan]

In mooring and loading equipment, the IL-76 is no worse. Here, if you put photos with the preparation of the IL-76 for landing 4 platforms with equipment, this is where you CAN be proud that our equipment is no worse.

[max702]

As far as I understood, there is the main difference in the loading width. Il 76, despite the suitable carrying capacity of the T72-T90, you will not fit in .. In what, and in the field of logistics, the probable "friends" have a lot to learn .. If the USSR army fought in Afghanistan and the US army would supply it in a couple everyone would have finished three years ..

[pavlowsky]

Here it is necessary to take off:

[Danik_Rok]

So, I did not understand why so many +?!

[code54]

Trucks interesting with seats on the platform! )

[waggish]

Personally, I saw .............. October 25, 2008