Military Review

Su-30SM at the Marine Aviation Pilot Training Center in Yeisk

56
Blog bmpd with reference to the web resource "aviaforum.ru" posted on his website a photo of a two-seat multi-functional fighter Su-30SM Marine aviation Russian Navy with tail number “35 blue”, which is currently part of the 859th Training Center for Naval Aviation Pilots of the Russian Navy in Yeysk.



The blog reports that “this is one of the three first Su-30SM fighters built by the Irkutsk Aviation Plant OJSC“ Irkut Corporation ”, received by 19 July 2014 naval aircraft of the year (serial numbers 10МКХNUMX 5, 1102МКХNUMX 10 and 5МХXXXXUMX 1103 and 10XXXXXUMNXXXXX5 1104, XXUMXXX35 36 and 37XXXXXUMXXNUMX XNUMX and XNUMXXXXXNXX XNUMX, XNUMXMXXNUMX XNUMX and XNUMXXXXXNXX XNUMX and XNUMX numbers "XNUMX", "XNUMX" and "XNUMX") ".

These aircraft were built as part of the first contract concluded in 2013 between the Ministry of Defense and Irkut Corporation for the supply of X-NUMX Su-5CM aircraft to Naval Aviation. Three fighters from this series arrived in July of this year in Yeisk, where they are used to retrain flight crews for aircraft of this type. The remaining two cars must arrive at the Center before the end of the year.

According to the blog, “5 of September 2014 of the year JSC Irkut Corporation has entered into a contract worth about 13 billion rubles for the supply of Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy to seven more Su-30CM fighter jets”, as well as property necessary to support the operation of these aircraft.

Photos used:
bmpd.livejournal.com
56 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ispaniard
    ispaniard 15 September 2014 13: 56
    +24
    Handsome men! The colors are very good! By the way, the star on the tail is by the way the old "Tricolor" and not "Pepsi" and thank God.
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 15 September 2014 14: 02
      +3
      According to the blog, “5 of September 2014 of the year JSC Irkut Corporation has entered into a contract worth about 13 billion rubles for the supply of Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy to seven more Su-30CM fighter jets”, as well as property necessary to support the operation of these aircraft.


      And how many SU-30СМ in general will be built and delivered for the Navy and the Air Force as a whole? And then 7 planes, and there 5 under some kind of contract, it certainly sounds good, and what is coming, but I hope at least dozens?
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 15 September 2014 14: 17
        +6
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        And how many SU-30СМ in general will be built and delivered for the Navy and the Air Force as a whole? And then 7 planes, and there 5 under some kind of contract, it certainly sounds good, and what is coming, but I hope at least dozens?


        Ordered:
        Sioux 30M2 - version of the Su-30MK2, designed for the Russian Air Force. In 2010, factory flight tests of the first production Su-30M2 were completed. In the Russian Air Force 4 aircraft delivered, another 16 aircraft ordered to replace the decommissioned Su-27UB.

        Sioux 30SM - (serial upgraded) Su-30MKI, designed for the Russian Air Force. The first flight was September 21, 2012. From 2013, flight tests of the aircraft will begin. As of 2014, for the Russian Air Force 60 Su-30SM ordered (16 vehicles delivered - 3 to the Chkalov GLIC, 3 to the Lipetsk Air Center, 10 to the Domna air base near Chita), for the Russian Navy - 5 + 7 cars.

        Deliveries:
        3 Su-30s delivered in 1994-1996.
        8 Su-30M2 as of the end of 2013.
        16 Su-30SM as of the end of 2013.
        In 2014, the delivery of 21 Su-30SMs is expected.
        On August 5, 2014, the Russian Air Force delivered 4 Su-30M2.
        1. Sergei1982
          Sergei1982 15 September 2014 15: 31
          +2
          There is information that the general order for the Navy will be from 50-60 Su-30cm.
      2. Russ69
        Russ69 15 September 2014 14: 19
        +1
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        And how many SU-30СМ in general will be built and delivered for the Navy and the Air Force as a whole? And then 7 planes, and there 5 under some kind of contract, it certainly sounds good, and what is coming, but I hope at least dozens?

        When concluding the first contract, the Navy spoke about plans for the purchase of 50 pieces. The total cost was estimated at 2 billion. But then, the timing of the allocation of money was not clear. Apparently, they will be buying in small batches ...
        1. Sergei1982
          Sergei1982 15 September 2014 15: 33
          0
          Do not know the aviation of the Navy brought back from the Air Force or not, if not then bad they have the specifics of the tasks are very different.
    2. Sergei1982
      Sergei1982 15 September 2014 14: 07
      +1
      We need more planes and the Navy and the Air Force, but for now, the difficulties with the PAK FA and Su-35, Mig-35 need to be purchased for the Su-30SM, Su-34, Mig-29cmt reserves for their future modernization.
    3. lelikas
      lelikas 15 September 2014 14: 07
      +3
      Quote: ispaniard
      Beauties! Coloring is coming!

      And on the contrary, I don’t like Serdyukovsky gray, although there is nothing to ruin a beautiful car.
    4. subbtin.725
      subbtin.725 15 September 2014 14: 21
      +1
      Quote: ispaniard
      Beauties! Coloring is coming!


      The leadership of the Russian Air Force praises them very much. And these specialists know what they are saying. Recently, more and more objects appear in Russia for genuine fake pride for our beloved Motherland. RUSSIA - this must be said with pride.
    5. ava09
      ava09 15 September 2014 14: 50
      +1
      The star is real, it has remained since the times of the USSR. And what a tricolor. that Pepsi are remodels, cutting roots ...
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 15 September 2014 17: 10
        +2
        Quote: ava09
        The star is real, it has remained since the times of the USSR. And what a tricolor. that Pepsi are remodels, cutting roots ...

        Star - Russian -
    6. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 15 September 2014 20: 23
      +2
      Quote: ispaniard
      Star by the way on the tail by the way old

      the fact that a "star" is already inspiring hope ...
  2. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 15 September 2014 13: 58
    +7
    Beautiful fighters all the same .. I never cease to admire!
  3. trenitron
    trenitron 15 September 2014 14: 02
    +9
    Beautiful, but 12 machines for the Navy will not be enough
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 15 September 2014 14: 03
      +1
      Quote: trenitron
      Beautiful, but 12 machines for the Navy will not be enough


      What? recourse I am far from aviation, but it’s not even a squadron. I'm right? what
      1. trenitron
        trenitron 15 September 2014 14: 05
        +2
        Well, 12 is sort of like a squadron. On the other hand, in Crimea, plans to deploy about 40 SU-30
        1. Nevsky_ZU
          Nevsky_ZU 15 September 2014 14: 08
          +1
          Quote: trenitron
          Well, 12 is sort of like a squadron. On the other hand, in Crimea, plans to deploy about 40 SU-30


          And I thought 16 cars, this is a squadron request
          1. aleks 62
            aleks 62 15 September 2014 14: 24
            +1
            ..... A squadron is 10 cars + 1 komeska .... 2 squadrons of an air regiment (according to a new calculation), there was a time when 3 squadrons of an air regiment .... Judging by the number of 40 pieces, an air regiment ....
            1. trenitron
              trenitron 15 September 2014 14: 36
              +3
              In Baltimore, the SU-34 squadron of 12 aircraft, in Krymsk, a squadron of 12 aircraft
              1. severniy
                severniy 15 September 2014 19: 33
                0
                Quote: trenitron
                In Baltimore, the SU-34 squadron of 12 aircraft, in Krymsk, a squadron of 12 aircraft

                But doesn’t Armavir keep such ???
            2. VAF
              VAF 15 September 2014 16: 40
              +2
              Quote: aleks 62
              ..... A squadron is 10 cars + 1 komeska .... 2 squadrons of an air regiment (according to a new calculation), there was a time when 3 squadrons of an air regiment .... Judging by the number of 40 pieces, an air regiment ....


              I have the courage to correct you a little.
              1. OSH in various kinds of the Air Force - VARIOUS.

              If for fighters, then under the USSR in the IAP and APIB the payroll reached 40-46 machines, but ... all UBs that were usually "assigned" to the 3rd AE ... were not included in the state. But only in the LIST (a UB-shek was from 2 to 5).

              2. Never did the command staff of the AE and AP have their own planes .... only regular AE planes, and there were only 12 of them (3 links of 4 cars).

              3. Previously, combat regiments were of 3 squadrons. The exception was UAE and OAP and the United Arab Emirates, and so ... in all types of aviation of the 3rd squadron. Only in the "long" and "bag" aviation there were 9 machines (3 squads of 3 aircraft).

              Now there is still a "leapfrog" in the minds and plans. cannot come to a common denominator, i.e. or return to the good old system of regiments and divisions ... or leave these ... without a mat you can't say an air group and an air base wassat

              But so far they are trying to form 12 aircraft in all remaining branches of aviation, except for the "long" and "bag"
              1. Andrey Yuryevich
                Andrey Yuryevich 15 September 2014 20: 32
                +2
                Quote: vaf
                I have the courage to correct you a little.

                hell, Serge! I'm glad that as I read the comments I got to you, thanks for the clear explanations! damn, at least you stay on the site! but then there are few such people as You, the Postman (I miss), some slogans .... drinks
                1. VAF
                  VAF 15 September 2014 20: 49
                  +1
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  , Postman (miss you), it has become few, only slogans.


                  Hi Andrew! drinks Glad to see you in good health soldier
                  I'm on the Postman .. actually, as something was cut off. Already addressed to the Admins .. nothing at all crying
                  And the Professor, and Oleg Kaptsov, and many, many very worthy, competent and respected people left the site .. very sorry .. VERY MUCH !!! soldier
                  1. Andrey Yuryevich
                    Andrey Yuryevich 15 September 2014 20: 56
                    +3
                    Earrings-GREETING! yes ... a lot of people have left the site, and this is a reason for the Admins to think, but there were really literate people who you can ask and get by "ears" not too bad ..., the site loses its rating ... it loses ... drinks
          2. VAF
            VAF 15 September 2014 16: 43
            +1
            Quote: Nevsky_ZU
            And I thought 16 cars, this is a squadron


            This is a squadron, but ... UAUP (training aviation regiment!) +! drinks In the UAE (separate) reached from 20 to 40 aircraft wink
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 15 September 2014 20: 25
        +2
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Quote: trenitron
        Beautiful, but 12 machines for the Navy will not be enough


        What? recourse I am far from aviation, but it’s not even a squadron. I'm right? what

        it's even scary how right you are ... hi
    2. pahom54
      pahom54 15 September 2014 14: 49
      0
      trenitron
      "Beautiful, but 12 vehicles for the Navy will not be enough" ...

      We need to rejoice in this too, there’s at least something to teach marine pilots to do, and this is a difficult matter ... Mass purchases are still not for the money, and they are not so urgently needed as for conventional front-line aviation ...
  4. Neighbor
    Neighbor 15 September 2014 14: 03
    +3
    Quote: ispaniard
    Handsome men! The colors are very good! By the way, the star on the tail is by the way the old "Tricolor" and not "Pepsi" and thank God.

    Not tricolor but Soviet, thank you, sir. And who wants to Pepsi, let immediately "Mohen David" offer.
  5. VICTOR-61
    VICTOR-61 15 September 2014 14: 07
    +1
    Super, but the more the better it is still necessary for Russia to buy back the army is strengthening and it's great not only with Gorbachev and Yeltsin
    1. enot73
      enot73 15 September 2014 14: 53
      +2
      Quote: VICTOR-61
      Super, but the more the better it is necessary to buy Russia more
      The process of transferring the deck MiG - 29 to the Russian Navy also began. In total, it is planned to include 24 carrier-based MiG-29K / KUB fighter planes into the naval aviation of the Russian Navy. All aircraft will be handed over to the military until 2015.
      1. Codename49
        Codename49 15 September 2014 16: 47
        0
        Beauty is power !!!
      2. VAF
        VAF 15 September 2014 17: 28
        +2
        Quote: enot73
        The process of transferring the deck MiG-29 to the Russian Navy has also begun.


        It started then started. dawot ... not quite .. "started" bully

      3. VAF
        VAF 15 September 2014 17: 33
        +1
        Quote: enot73
        Russian Navy decked MiG - 29.


        Your photo is "ancient" as ... my life lol (first flights, first prototype 9-41)

        Now it doesn’t look like that, but like that wink and it will definitely not be "passed on" to anyone, because. he is the property of RSK soldier

  6. surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 15 September 2014 14: 07
    +1
    Is he not ship-based? It seems that the entire coastal IA under Serdyuk was taken from the Navy.
    1. trenitron
      trenitron 15 September 2014 14: 12
      +2
      No, he is not ship-based. True, the nomenclature of weapons is quite good
      1. sergey32
        sergey32 15 September 2014 14: 18
        +1
        And the second thread was completed in Yeysk?
        1. trenitron
          trenitron 15 September 2014 14: 21
          0
          It is funded, but I do not know if it is completed or not. Plans say they were for completion
      2. surovts.valery
        surovts.valery 15 September 2014 15: 50
        0
        Those. RCC are present. Those. is it not a fighter but a fighter-bomber? But I repeat the question? Why the Navy badge is the Andrevsky flag? Will they go to the Black Sea Fleet?
        1. VAF
          VAF 15 September 2014 17: 16
          +1
          Quote: surovts.valery
          Those. RCC are present. Those. is it not a fighter but a fighter-bomber?


          Interesting .. "logic" wassat .. means so ... if RCC is not, then this is ...




          But if there is RCC, then this is .. Fighter-Bomber? belay wassat

          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 15 September 2014 19: 17
            +1
            Hello, Sergey.
            And I look forward to when new missiles appear under the belly of these aircraft. Including new anti-ship missiles.
  7. Wiruz
    Wiruz 15 September 2014 14: 08
    0
    It’s time to buy 35 instead of 30. And for the Air Force, and for the Navy
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 15 September 2014 14: 11
      +2
      Quote: Wiruz
      It’s time to buy 35 instead of 30. And for the Air Force, and for the Navy


      Dreams, dreams, there are also sanctions with Ukraine, you need to buy one thing and right now. PAK-FA is crude, and SU-30SM is almost "yesterday", SU-35S needs to be riveted en masse
      1. Ustin
        Ustin 15 September 2014 15: 30
        +1
        "It is necessary to rivet SU-35S en masse" - which is not even "almost today" yet. Yes, and the machines are slightly different in purpose. So the decision on "CM" is absolutely correct at the moment.
        1. VAF
          VAF 15 September 2014 18: 18
          0
          Quote: Ustin
          "It is necessary to rivet the SU-35S en masse" - which is not even "almost today"


          Hello, buddy .. "skoka years, skoka winters" .. although in those parts probably about winter and not ... heard wassat
          About 35C ... do not "reveal", people are on their nerves, they do not understand a lot and do not want to understand. Otherwise, you will pick up the cons wassat ).
          If someone writes .. be sure to show at work .. the reaction will be wassat good

          Quote: Ustin
          So the decision on "CM" is absolutely correct at the moment.


          And at this moment and in the following .. "moments", in short. RESPECT, +
          ++++++ !!!! drinks soldier

        2. Wedmak
          Wedmak 15 September 2014 19: 20
          +1
          So the decision on "CM" is absolutely correct at the moment.

          Moreover, the 35 is not quite adapted for the sea. Two people in an airplane crew above the sea are better than one.
  8. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 15 September 2014 14: 10
    +2
    I can not find other words - BEAUTY!
    Such news, overwhelming the soul for Russia!
  9. Krsk
    Krsk 15 September 2014 14: 35
    +1
    Every day I go by I confirm handsome men and fly like ...
  10. volot-voin
    volot-voin 15 September 2014 14: 50
    0
    Russian falcons Pride and glory!
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 15 September 2014 21: 15
      +1
      Quote: volot-voin
      Russian falcons Pride and glory!

      What is this slogan for you? a plus? or two ??
  11. aleksandrs95
    aleksandrs95 15 September 2014 15: 11
    0
    I’m sorry, can anyone explain such an important thing. The price for 7 devices is about 13 billion. So how much does it cost then 1, under 2 billion. The price for one under 55 million Bakinsky is obtained. Of course, I apologize, but somehow expensive. All the same, the money is ahead and what no series will be. Here would be 42-45 million. another thing, otherwise we can fly into the pipe. For ourselves, it should be noticeably cheaper than for export. Explain if you misunderstood.
    1. rugor
      rugor 15 September 2014 15: 37
      0
      Quote: aleksandrs95
      I’m sorry, can anyone explain such an important thing. The price for 7 devices is about 13 billion. So how much does it cost then 1, under 2 billion. The price for one under 55 million Bakinsky is obtained. Of course, I apologize, but somehow expensive. All the same, the money is ahead and what no series will be. Here would be 42-45 million. another thing, otherwise we can fly into the pipe. For ourselves, it should be noticeably cheaper than for export. Explain if you misunderstood.


      Grandmas for pre-production are also crammed into the contract, and this is a big piece of capital investment, the following should be cheaper.
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 15 September 2014 17: 15
      0
      Quote: aleksandrs95
      Of course, I'm sorry, but somehow expensive.

      The Saudis take F-16 Block 61 for 200 lard - write to them - let them start saving. laughing
  12. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 15 September 2014 15: 30
    0
    Why are there different colors on board rooms? Belonging to different types of troops?
  13. propolsky
    propolsky 15 September 2014 15: 30
    +1
    Mass retraining of flight crews is a very good thing. Over time, they will make planes and flight crews are ready for operation. Good luck.
  14. Sergei1982
    Sergei1982 15 September 2014 15: 42
    0
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    Quote: Wiruz
    It’s time to buy 35 instead of 30. And for the Air Force, and for the Navy


    Dreams, dreams, there are also sanctions with Ukraine, you need to buy one thing and now. PAK-FA is crude, and the SU-30SM is almost; yesterday ;, you need to rivet the SU-35S massively

    According to rumors, the Su-35 still has some shortcomings, who educate a specialist, and the Su-30cm is a good aircraft that has been worked out in production in the future, during modernization, it can be equipped with engines of the 3 series (if finished) and AFAR (if it is brought to mind), let's say from MIG-35 By the way, did anyone know our analogue of PNK "Lightning" was brought or not.
  15. Sergei1982
    Sergei1982 15 September 2014 15: 46
    0
    Quote: aleksandrs95
    I’m sorry, can anyone explain such an important thing. The price for 7 devices is about 13 billion. So how much does it cost then 1, under 2 billion. The price for one under 55 million Bakinsky is obtained. Of course, I apologize, but somehow expensive. All the same, the money is ahead and what no series will be. Here would be 42-45 million. another thing, otherwise we can fly into the pipe. For ourselves, it should be noticeably cheaper than for export. Explain if you misunderstood.

    Perhaps this contract includes additional equipment. Past orders cost 1,3-1,4 billion rubles apiece.
  16. Anton Gavrilov
    Anton Gavrilov 15 September 2014 16: 06
    +1
    36-th board, all in all, the Navy gave 3 such.
  17. Maks7877
    Maks7877 15 September 2014 18: 11
    0
    It's a pity I'm not in my hometown right now. I would have looked.
  18. Ivansvoy
    Ivansvoy 15 September 2014 18: 42
    0
    Our most beautiful, best of all, and ace pilots.
  19. Wedmak
    Wedmak 15 September 2014 19: 24
    +1
    Still, the theme a la A-40 / A-42 would be revived, otherwise the updated IL-38 is certainly good, but they are old and few of them.
    1. VAF
      VAF 15 September 2014 20: 59
      +1
      Quote: Wedmak
      Still, the theme a la A-40 / A-42 would be revived,


      Denis, hi! even though the Be-200 is shifted from the dead center. and you are talking about the A-40 .... count 99% .. there will be no car .. died, so died, unfortunately crying

      Quote: Wedmak
      and then the updated IL-38 is certainly good


      That's why our Indian friends from them as .. "the devil with incense" ran away to the side of ... amerovsky "Neptunes" bully crying recourse



      On September 9, the Indian Navy received the fifth base naval patrol aircraft Boeing P-8I out of eight ordered.

      The program is being carried out on schedule, aircraft will significantly increase the reconnaissance and anti-ship / anti-submarine capabilities of the Indian Navy.
      By the end of this year, the sixth aircraft will be delivered, in 2015 the last two. The contract was signed in 2009.




      P-8I is an export version of the P-8A Poseidon aircraft, adopted by the U.S. Navy and created on the basis of the Boeing 737-800ERX commercial airliner.
      At present, there are at least 17 Poseidons in American naval aviation, and it is planned to purchase 117 aircraft.
      The Australian Navy ordered four aircraft.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 15 September 2014 22: 18
        +1
        even though Be-200 is shifted from the dead center

        And what is wrong with the Be-200? It seems that there are orders, they are building, but only for the Ministry of Emergencies. Something did not hear about the combat (patrol or anti-submarine) modification.
        That's why our Indian friends from them like .. "devil from incense" fled to the side

        On bezrybe and cancer - meat. Nobody will definitely sell Poseidons to us. And it would not hurt us to kick in the direction of modifying the new Il-s into marine patrols.
        1. VAF
          VAF 16 September 2014 17: 31
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          And what is wrong with the Be-200? It seems that there are orders, they are building


          When did the extreme Irkut release? wink And how much after this Berievtsy? And the years of lope passed in the course? recourse
      2. Gregazov
        Gregazov 15 September 2014 23: 26
        +1
        I did not understand about the A-40. What Konstantinovtsy wrote off equipment and threw out drawings?
        1. VAF
          VAF 16 September 2014 17: 29
          0
          Quote: GregAzov
          they wrote off the equipment and threw out the drawings?


          The "papers" have already been covered with a thick, thick layer of dust, but about the equipment .... crying , about "working people" is even more deplorable, unfortunately recourse