160 years ago, the West began the invasion of the Crimea

35
160 years ago, 2 (14) September 1854, the landing of the expeditionary army of the anti-Russian coalition in Evpatoria began. Thus, the invasion of the troops of the then "world community" in the Crimea began.

Prehistory Attack on Odessa

In January 1854, the combined Anglo-French fleet entered the Black Sea. 17 (29) January, the French Emperor Napoleon III demanded that Russia withdraw its troops from the Danube principalities (Danube campaign of the Eastern War) and start negotiations with Porto. Russia rejected this ultimatum. 15 (27) March 1854, England and France declared war on the Russian Empire. Even before the official declaration of war, Napoleon III ordered the formation of an "eastern army" and appointed Marshal Armand Leroy de Saint-Arno to command it.

As a result, there was a threat of landing of Allied forces in the Russian Black Sea region. All Black Sea ports were threatened by bombing. Of particular importance was Kerch. Practically nothing was done for her defense, and Vice Admiral Serebryakov in April 1854 of the year complained that the Kerch governor was not doing anything and was still waiting for official instructions. The coastal trade voyage, which had a base in Kerch, provided the entire Crimean army and troops on the coast of the Caucasus. The enemy could still attack the defenseless Kerch in the spring and capture or sink transport ships.

Unfortunately, until June, the commander of the Russian troops in the Crimea, Alexander Menshikov, did nothing to strengthen the coastal defense. Fortunately for Russia, the allies also did not differ in promptness and did not establish maritime intelligence. For a long time they could not determine where it was most convenient for them to launch an offensive.

29 March (9 April) 1854. An 16-type steam frigate “Furious” approached Odessa. Officially, he had to evacuate from the city the consuls of the allied states and all other subjects of these powers who wish to leave Russia. Unofficially, the ship was supposed to conduct reconnaissance of coastal fortifications. On March 30 (April 10) the ship approached the port and launched the boat, which, under the white (parliamentary) flag, approached the pier. There the British were informed that the consuls had already left Odessa. The boat returned safely to the frigate. Then the ship headed for the coastal battery line. To discourage the enemy, the Russian guns gave two warning shots.

The Allies decided to use this incident as a pretext for an attack. The captain of the frigate reported to the commander of the Allied fleet Admirals Dondas and Gamelen, that “the Russians do not respect parliamentarians,” and they fired on a boat sailing under the white flag and had an officer sent for negotiations on board. French Admiral Gamelin immediately "offended" for the English delegate. The British admiral Dondas, who had not been in a hurry to attack Russian ships or harbors before, believing that the allied army landing in Varna was not worth starting, had to agree with the Frenchman. Gamelin reported to Paris that the Allied fleet would open military operations against Odessa, "in order to demand reparations from the authorities of this city for the outrageous assault of port batteries on the English frigate and the English boat sailing under the parliamentary flag."

The 8 (20) of April allied fleet, including 28 pennants (including 6 battleships, 13 frigates), approached Odessa. Odessa was declared a state of siege. 100-thousand The city and the largest Russian trade port on the Black Sea was fortified very weakly. The six coastal batteries built at the beginning of the war were armed with 40 old fortress guns. The garrison of the city made up a detachment of 16 reserve battalions commanded by Dmitry Osten-Sacken.

On April 9 (21), an envoy arrived to Baron Osten-Sacken and, on behalf of Admiral Dondas and Admiral Gamelin, demanded the extradition of all the Russian ships in the harbor, as well as British and French (commercial) ships. The Russian general said that he would not respond to such audacity.

10 (22) April around 6: The morning 40 began shelling. 9 of enemy steamer frigates (one 54-gun, eight others mostly 32-gun) approached the break. The fire was sent to the batteries, which, due to the weakness of the weapons, could not meet the enemy ships. At the very end of the Practical Mole was the battery number 6 (the so-called left battery), which in fact alone was able to respond to the enemy. She was armed with all the 4 guns - one was soon shot down, and the second was inconvenient and could not fire. Battery commanded 21-year-old graduate of the cadet corps Ensign Alexander Schegolev. Shchegolev battery bombarded 9 enemy ships. Battery No. 6 fought 6 hours and was able to damage one enemy ship. In total, during the battle 4 enemy ships were damaged. After many hours of shelling, the Allies attempted to land reconnaissance ships in order to assess the damage, but this attempt at an assault force was reflected by field gun fire.

11 (23) April, the enemy squadron took off from the anchor and went to sea. The garrison lost about 250 people. A part of the city adjacent to the port was destroyed, the port berths, warehouses of both Russians and neutral commercial ships in the harbor were burned.

However, a few days later the Allied squadron suffered the first annoying loss. April 30 (12 May) in the morning, with thick fog, 6 versts from Odessa ran aground as one of the newest and best British steamers - the 16-cannon-powered steam-frigate Tigr. Desperate efforts of the crew to remove the frigate from the shoals ended in failure. The Russians quickly deployed field batteries on the shore and shot down the enemy ship. Steamer frigate fired up. The crew lowered the flag and surrendered. 225 people were captured. Captain Giffard was wounded and soon passed away. A steam engine was removed from the ship’s wreck (later it was installed on an imperial yacht) and part of the guns, they strengthened the coastal defense of Odessa.

The death of "Tiger" has become a landmark event. Given the insignificant, from a military point of view, the results of the shelling of Odessa, the loss of the newest ship was a painful blow to the Allied squadron. It should be noted that in London and Paris were dissatisfied with the actions of their fleets. The actions of the powerful allied fleet in the Baltic were practically fruitless. The expedition to the White Sea ended with little success (The barbaric attack of the British on the Solovki monastery and the burning of Coke). Soon the news will come that the expedition to the Pacific to Petropavlovsk ended in complete failure (Heroic defense of Petropavlovsk). This fact will generally try to shut up. The barren shelling of Odessa also did not appeal to the Western public, who eagerly awaited the victorious news. Therefore, the closest attention was paid to the expeditionary army, which was transferred to the Bulgarian Varna.


Trophy gun with a frigate "Tiger"

Varna

12 (24) March 1854. Napoleon III signed a decree on the formation of a special eastern army. Initially, it consisted of four infantry and one cavalry divisions, 7 1 / 2 batteries and a special siege park (24 guns, 12 howitzers and 22 mortars). In total, there were about 40 thousand soldiers in the army. 24 March (5 April) 1854 began boarding. The preliminary landing took place in Turkish in Gallipoli. At the end of May, the troops began to transfer to Varna. By early June, three divisions had been deployed. As a result, French troops appeared on the Danube when the Russian army was already withdrawing from it. In addition, part of the French remained in Gallipoli and Constantinople.

Almost immediately between the allies began to disagree. The French marshal of Saint-Arno, an adventurer by nature, noted the atrocities in Algeria, where his troops were called "hellish column" (Napoleon III brought him closer and elevated because of his qualities - mercilessness to enemies and complete lack of principle), he tried to subdue the British and Turkish troops under the command of Lord Raglan and Omer Pasha. However, the British were not going to obey the French. Lord Raglan had instructions that commanded him to obey exclusively to the British War Minister and to no one else. Although, ultimately, in the course of hostilities, the will of Marshal Saint-Arno became decisive. He was much more experienced in warfare than the British lord.

Arriving in Varna, the allies from the very beginning felt uncomfortable. The Bulgarians for the most part sympathized with the Russians, not the allies, who came to preserve the Ottoman yoke over Bulgaria. Problems began with the issue of transport. Despite the fact that the Allies initially offered good money by local standards, there were few willing people. Then Saint-Arnaud, who was accustomed in Africa not to intercede with the local population and never considered Arabs to be people, allowing his soldiers to rob and kill them for the slightest disobedience, ordered the 800 Bulgarians and their oxen and carts to be captured and held. However, the Bulgarians responded with a mass flight and began to break and burn their carts, risking being shot.

True, in Varna there were many Turks, Vlachs and Moldovans. However, according to the observations of foreigners, the Turks did not want to work. Wallachs and Moldovans were also lazy, although they wanted to get money for their work. It was necessary to seize again and detain the Bulgarians, who did not want to support the allies of their oppressors.

Moreover, the relations between the allies themselves were not friendly. The French quarreled with the British. French officers believed that the British lured their unprofitable event, which will strengthen only England. Annoyed by the French and too modest participation of British troops in the campaign. Initially, England exhibited only one corps of 20 thousand people. In addition, Saint-Arno and his generals did not like the quality of the English soldiers. In England, soldiers were recruited through “voluntary” employment, and a lot of drunkards, loafers, tramps, and other dubious individuals fell into it, a significant part of whom were ready to desert at the first opportunity (in this historical period from the English army defected to a quarter of the composition). Therefore, the discipline of the British supported the most severe executions.

In general, the British army was a caste - the officers were the "highest caste." The officers bought their officers' patents for money (and often for big money), and tried to “return” the money. Special military training of British officers in most cases was equal to zero. The British were not ready for a new war. At the same time, they were distinguished by their resilience, dying without much benefit, which, taking into account the complete illiteracy of the command, often happened. On the other hand, the English were well supplied. In this, the French envied them.

The French did not like the Turks. They witnessed the decline and degradation of the Ottoman Empire and understood, as the witness of the campaign noted, the French officer Charles Baucher, "the Russian emperor had reason and truth for himself when he claimed that Turkey was in agony ...". France stood up for Turkey and did not get anything from it, unlike the British.

Complicated the matter and the Polish question. The Poles dreamed that they would create a special detachment or corps (legion) from the emigrants, which would become the army and take part in the “liberation of Poland”. However, both Paris and London, although at one time the Poles made a lot of promises, did not want to create a Polish legion. This was due to the position of Austria. A significant part of the Polish lands was part of Austria, and the creation of a separate Polish military contingent with the slogan "liberation of Poland" could have frightened Vienna and strengthened its ties with St. Petersburg. Therefore, the Poles were offered to quietly join the Turkish army and fight in Asia (on the Caucasian front).

Moreover, the mood of the expeditionary army and the cholera epidemic did not improve. The fight against the epidemic was very difficult. The city, occupied by the whole army, was extremely filthy, just impassable from debris and sewage. Nobody wanted to clean up the dirt and debris. The Bulgarians did not go to this work either for money or under the influence of threats and corporal punishment. The detachment, which was sent to reconnaissance, completely lost its combat capability due to illness. In their completely aimless expedition to Dobrudja (the Russian troops had already retreated), French troops lost 3,5 thousand people dead from cholera and exhaustion. Only in August, about 10% of the entire crew died in the fleet, even more lay on the bunks, waiting for death.

13 July St. Arnaud received an order to prepare for an expedition to the Crimea. The plan of operation should have been worked out in the command of the eastern army. The reason for this order was the failure of the actions of the allies in the Baltic strategic direction, where the Anglo-French fleet could do nothing, and Sweden did not want to fight with Russia and the position of Austria. The Vienna court was in no hurry to speak out against Russia and took a wait-and-see attitude.

Preparations for the expedition began. From the very beginning it was clear that the main goal was Sevastopol. But for a successful expedition to the Crimea, it was necessary to conduct reconnaissance, organize the landing of the army, provide it with everything necessary, etc. A whole month passed while we were preparing for the march.

10 (22) August, a terrible fire of "unknown" origin almost destroyed the powder depots and a huge depot of ammunition, the allied army, where there were 8 million shells. The whole army desperately rushed to save the army reserves. Soldiers and officers worked with axes, destroying buildings, along which fire went to powder stores. The situation was desperate. Four times, by his own admission, the French commander-in-chief was ready to order the troops to drop everything and flee in order to save themselves from the consequences of the inevitable unheard of force of the explosion. This fire nearly destroyed the entire 1854 campaign of the year. The Allied army lost reserves of supplies, ammunition, but rescued ammunition.

The fire forced the Allies to finally decide, as soon as possible to leave the “damned place” - Varna. The allies were annoyed and frightened, believing that hidden enemies had set the fire and turned their anger on the local population. As a result, even the Turks began to complain about the ugly behavior of their "defenders". They noted that the enemies (the Russians who occupied Varna in 1828-1829) treated them much better than their “friends”. The Russians did not make a complaint to anyone about their behavior, and left the city behind in better condition than it was before.

Delaying the departure from Varna became already impossible. The Allies finally stopped in the Crimea. The issue of landing on the coast of the Caucasus has disappeared. The British wanted to help Shamil and expel the Russians from the South Caucasus, but they would prefer to do this with the hands of the Ottomans and the French. They themselves did not want to go to the Caucasus. The French did not want to die in the Caucasus because of the interests of Britain (guarding the routes to Persia and India). Therefore, when the delegation of Shamil arrived in Varna on July 25, she was warmly welcomed, but no more. From the attack on the Danube direction also refused. For success on the Danube and Prut, active assistance was necessary for Austria, but it was not there.

In mid-August, St. Arnaud's 1854 held a military meeting. On it the naval commanders — the English and French admirals Dondas and Gamelin, spoke out against the expedition to the Crimea. Dondas said that the allies' all power lies in the fleet, and in the Crimea and at Sevastopol they will have to risk the fleet. Gamelin supported the English admiral. He was worried that cholera would continue to the Crimea, and replacing a good sailor or midshipman is much more difficult than a soldier. In addition, he believed that Sevastopol could not be taken from the sea. Apparently, both admirals also kept in mind the brilliant victory of Nakhimov at Sinop (Sinop battle 18 (30) November 1853 g), to drop the Black Sea Fleet was not worth it. The dispute went on for a long time. However, Saint-Arnaud suppressed resistance and pushed the decision on the expedition to the Crimea. In addition, Lord Raglan knew that in London, waiting for an attack on the Russian coast and did not resist. It was no longer possible to stay in Varna, nor to return to Constantinople. This would be a confession in defeat. Naval commanders were forced to accept. It should be noted that the Ottomans were not even invited to the meeting and were informed about its results only after the decision was made.

Disembarkation

The landing of troops and artillery on ships began on August 31. Saint-Arno himself boarded the ship 2 (14) September. 5 (17) September, the French squadron was removed from the anchor. The British squadron joined her a little later, and the whole armada moved to the Crimea.

On September 8, on the way, St. Arnaud held a meeting where it was decided to send a commission to the peninsula to determine the best place to land. Four ships accompanied this commission. On September 11, the exploration commission returned and set out the findings. According to her, the Russians prepared positions at Kachi and Alma, although there are no large defenses there. A place convenient for disembarking was found on the coast between Alma and Evpatoria. The city itself Evpatoria can be the first supporting base of the landing.

Saint-Arnaud suggested landing at Kachi, pushing the Russian troops back with a fight and immediately moving to Sevastopol, saving it a few days. Lord Raglan and all British generals opposed this bold plan. They did not want to risk it. French admiral Gamelin supported the British. The French commander, who on that day experienced an acute crisis of illness (she would soon bring him to the grave), could not insist on his own. Therefore, they decided to land at Evpatoria.

On the morning of September 13, the first ships entered the bay. The city was not protected and had no garrison. St. Arnaud and Raglan approved the plan for the near future. They planned to occupy the city with a general garrison and in a few days to move to Sevastopol, leaning their flank to the sea. From the sea, the army was supposed to support artillery and supply part of the fleet with supplies.

At three o'clock in the morning, the landing of the army began on a signal shot. The city was busy without a fight. It left a small garrison. By noon, the landing of the French divisions was over. The British began to land after the French. Artillery, horses and various supplies were unloaded until late in the evening. By nightfall, a squadron of Admiral Dondas arrived, which left to do a demonstration in front of Kachey and Alma, in order to mislead the Russians. The next day, the fourth French division was landed. The Turks began to land after all. As a result, about 62-64 thousand bayonets and sabers were planted. The French and the British had an approximately equal number - in 27-29 thousand people, the Ottomans - 6-7 thousand people.

St. Arnaud was in a hurry, he knew that he was dying and wanted to open the campaign with a successful battle, but the attack on 17 September, as the Marshal had planned, failed. The British landed extremely slowly and carried with them a lot more cargo than the French. On September 17, Lord Raglan’s troops just completed their disembarkation. By this time, Saint-Arnaud received news that the Russian army was on the Alma, blocking the road to Sevastopol. September 19 at 7 in the morning the Allied army moved on to Sevastopol.


W. Simpson. Landing in Evpatoria
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +13
    14 September 2014 05: 56
    I read with pleasure a historical article about the history of Crimea. Thanks to the author Samsonov Alexander.
    1. +3
      14 September 2014 10: 50
      One of the most talented authors is Samsonov A., all materials are carefully studied, selected, comprehended, nothing more
    2. +1
      14 September 2014 13: 01
      The Crimean War forever entered the history of Russia the defense of Sevastopol, Sinop summation of the names of the heroes Nakhimov, Kornilov, Istomin and thousands of other names who gave their lives for RUSSIA. Eternal memory to the heroes.
    3. -2
      14 September 2014 23: 36
      I apologize for being off topic.
      Then Yandex reports that in Moscow beat the leading TV channel Rain Ksenia Batanova.

      What do you say about this?
      Deserved?
      1. Yes I am Russian
        0
        16 September 2014 01: 12
        to beat this superfluous, it is enough to close and ban in Russia this mouthpiece of the Abamov State Department
  3. +4
    14 September 2014 06: 10
    Greetings to all! Well then it’s not now, it’s symbolic on the eve of this date to place the SU-30 in Belbek.
    1. +1
      14 September 2014 06: 17
      Better Tu-22M3.
  4. +7
    14 September 2014 06: 15
    the allied fleet will open military operations against Odessa, "in order to demand reparations from the authorities of this city for the outrageous attack of port batteries on the English frigate and the English boat sailing under the parliamentary flag."


    An interesting article .... I compare the behavior of EUROPE of those years AND the current EUROPE I do not see any differences in the behavior of the French and Anglo-Saxons .... hehe hell lesson of the Crimean war did not go in vain for them.
    1. 0
      14 September 2014 13: 00
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I compare the behavior of EUROPE of those years and current EUROPE I do not see any differences in the behavior of the French and Anglo-Saxons ..

      Well, well, the start of World War III awaited: -under the pretext of the exercises, troops of Germany, Britain, the states, Baltic hangers-on, Poland were introduced into Ukraine .....
    2. +2
      14 September 2014 23: 21
      hehe lesson of the Crimean War they did not go for the future.


      In fact, it was Russia that lost the Crimean War. Forgot?
      And the heroism of the defenders of Sevastopol did not change the course of the war, having the 400000 army, Russia was not even able to carry out the transfer of troops to help the besieged.

      At the same time, the interventionists themselves even managed to build a railway in the Crimea (!), Along which reinforcements were being transferred.

      If someone went to the lesson in a prok, it’s the tsar and his servants, who finally found out that sometimes you need to break away from the sound of champagne in order to deal with your country.

      Here is Alexander II, who with his mistress (Prince Dolgorukaya) twisted tricks in secret from his sick wife, for example, "the highest deign" to abolish serfdom. Wait.

      And that would have fought smooth-bore guns against rifles.
      1. Tirpitz
        0
        15 September 2014 10: 51
        I completely agree. +. At that time, both the navy and the army were still living with the victories of 1812. And there was no modern weapons.
  5. +9
    14 September 2014 06: 18
    For a century, such a tidbit - like the Crimea - has been haunting the geyropa.
    To the fallen in battle - Glory and Eternal memory!
    1. 0
      14 September 2014 18: 17
      Quote: aszzz888
      For a century, such a tidbit - like the Crimea - has been haunting the geyropa.
      To the fallen in battle - Glory and Eternal memory!

      It's not just the Crimea. They have always had a bone in their throat.
  6. +10
    14 September 2014 06: 20
    The Crimean War showed once again that even coalitions of countries, even at an unsuccessful moment in the country's development, could not defeat Russia ............... The next invaders did not achieve anything either in Crimea or in Kamchatka and Baltic ................ Here is a plate of losses: -............................ .Relative losses of Russia, England and France in the Crimean War of 1853-1856. Table number 1.


    Countries

    Loss calculation

    % loss


    Russia

    (100 thousand / 66 million) * 100%

    0,15%


    France

    (90 thousand / 38 million) * 100%

    0,24%


    England

    (60 thousand / 30 million) * 100%

    0,20%


    Allies (France + England)

    (90 thousand francs + 60 thousand eng.) / (38 million francs + 30 million eng.) * 100% = (150 thousand / 68 million) * 100%

    0,22% ....... There are also slightly different data: -
    Russian losses in Crimea amounted to 128 people, allies - at least 669 soldiers and officers: 150 British, 000 Turks, more than 23 Italians and over 000 French ........... And this is with taking into account the absence (flooding) of the Fleet, and the backwardness in small arms ......... Honor and Glory to the Russian soldiers and sailors!
    ...........
  7. +14
    14 September 2014 06: 27
    I read Leo Tolstoy's "Sevastopol Stories" events are well described. All these actions make it clear, no matter what kind of system we have, monarchical, communist, capitalist, the West regards us as enemies in any case and under any pretext, there is no need to feed no illusions.
  8. +9
    14 September 2014 06: 28
    Historical events in the struggle of the countries of the world against Russia are extremely instructive and necessary. Yes, A. Samsonov’s essay contains errors, I think the editor needed to remove them (I’m not talking about dates, but about grammar). The victories of Russian weapons in the North, in the region of Kronstadt, in the Far East were very significant. Dear readers, do you know that the goal of the war of the united Anglo-French fleet in the Baltic was to capture St. Petersburg. That's what these bastards set themselves. And the British were allies of Russia in 1812. The combined fleet in the Baltic was able to take only one island, lost a number of ships and retreated. Russian sailors used sea mines here for the first time, the effect was amazing. One of the officers in Sveaborg was my father's ancestor. But we do not know his further fate. Read Samsonov, it is very interesting to everyone and instructive. I have the honor
  9. +4
    14 September 2014 06: 44
    Remember, the bastards, as they raked, and that is still raging.
  10. +3
    14 September 2014 07: 12
    160 years ago, 2 (14) September 1854, the landing of the expeditionary army of the anti-Russian coalition in Evpatoria began. Thus, the invasion of the troops of the then "world community" in the Crimea began.

    The consequences of the Bologna system of education in the Western coalition. If you knew history well, you would have concluded that as you climb into the Crimea, they will pile on you. There are still fresh memories in Germany ...
  11. +2
    14 September 2014 07: 35
    The Turks and Sardinians were not deservedly forgotten in the article))) The former have the largest losses in numerical terms, the latter in percentage terms.
    1. 0
      14 September 2014 10: 53
      Well, the Turks have the biggest losses overall, which include sanitary, they have a worse situation with medicine, and many have died from disease, and it’s less fighting than the French and British
  12. +2
    14 September 2014 08: 07
    The article is interesting and informative. Glory to the hero city of Sevastopol !!! Glory to the Russian soldiers !!!
  13. +5
    14 September 2014 08: 17
    160 years ago .... The anniversary year we have today! Maybe it's time to compile a collection of stories about the results of the military confrontations between Europe and Russia and send them to the current leaders? Be sure to read the recommendations before taking up the post! Perhaps wiser! wink
    1. +1
      14 September 2014 17: 40
      It seems like Russia is recognized as one of the most belligerent powers, so we are always afraid and a little, immediately merge into a coalition)
  14. +3
    14 September 2014 08: 37
    The West has not changed in a hundred and sixty years, just as they used to be jackals with hyenas, so these Anglo-Saxons remained who imagined themselves masters of the world, they do not suffer from loss of appetite, only recently Russia has become uncomfortable and stood like a bone in the throat of insatiable creatures. choke with God's help.
    1. +1
      14 September 2014 09: 27
      it was the last war of England with Russia, then the Anglo-Saxons acted only through intermediaries, so as not to directly rake themselves. That is, they made some conclusions
  15. Ivan Denikin
    +5
    14 September 2014 08: 57
    Return Crimea to Ukraine is a utopia!
    1. +5
      14 September 2014 13: 25
      Ivan Denikin
      Return Crimea to Ukraine is a utopia!

      The same utopia, how to return the land captured by the United States, the indigenous people - the Indians.
      1. 0
        14 September 2014 17: 54
        It seems to me that Britain will not be here soon, and indeed it feels like the scales were swaying in the other direction ......... and the queen - so, unnecessary junk, for lords to thump in their circle for some some ceremony ...... Nothing personal, but the monarchy does not make sense, sheer darkness and naivety.
  16. +1
    14 September 2014 09: 05
    and what did our fleet do?
    1. +2
      14 September 2014 09: 43
      at first he defeated the Turks at Sinop, the last battle of sailing fleets in history, and then lay at the bottom of the Sevastopol Bay, blocking the adversary’s entrance there
      1. +1
        14 September 2014 20: 04
        Quote: Pissarro
        then he lay at the bottom of the Sevastopol bay, blocking the entrance of the adversary there

        disagree ... He stood at the bastions and fired the same guns (or others but the Admiralty) and almost all died on the bastions ...
        10 sailors went into the infantry and fought on the ground with their weapons ..
        They even shot at naval ... the same teams (from the side) in the slot of fascines and ropes.
  17. +4
    14 September 2014 11: 09
    Obama today says that we in Russia think in historical categories of past centuries. Yes, we think. And we remember all the wars that Western Europe unleashed against us. And we remember the millions of Russian soldiers and officers who fell in these wars, the tears and pain of the civilian population of our cities and villages. A hungry, impoverished Europe, all its life plunged into the fertile lands and riches of Russia, dreamed of working the Russian people. How can you think differently, when now, in fact, the same thing happens, people die in the Donbass in the same way, women and children cry. The concepts of a single world, an information space, and a single economy are pushed back once and for all.
    But, you know, as they say in Russia, I, for example, would not even sit down with this West European scum on the same field!
  18. +3
    14 September 2014 11: 14
    "... This fire almost destroyed the entire campaign of 1854. The Allied army lost supplies of provisions, ammunition, but the ammunition was saved ..."
    Three times Viva !!! Russian Special Forces of those distant years.
  19. +1
    14 September 2014 11: 22
    All these dates and events occurring at this time. WHEN THESE EVENTS ARE DESCRIBED, should be studied in high school and educate the Russian spirit among young people. And in our history of the Russian state, thanks to the Ministry of Education, Russia’s role in liberating both Crimea and the South frontiers.
  20. +4
    14 September 2014 12: 52
    Yes, then Europe showed its bestial grin to Russia ...
    1. 0
      14 September 2014 18: 00
      Quote: kotev19
      Yes, then Europe showed its bestial grin to Russia ...
      Malakhov Kurgan, after the capture of the French natives. It's strange, like there was a 4th bastion on it ....... Now, if you had helped us then, the barbarians could not handle the Sevastopol ........ although who knows, maybe your guys thought of a fire in Varna )
      1. +1
        14 September 2014 20: 09
        Quote: Novel 11
        Malakhov Kurgan, after the capture of the French natives. Strange, like there was a 4th bastion on it

        work of Roger Fenton - Queen Victoria's personal photographer

        this man with equipment (not a couple of Athletes)
        Do not confuse - Malakhov Kurgan and 4 bastions are completely different things. In addition, the first was besieged by the French and the second by the purely British (they sent the whole army and could not take it at all)
        The photo was taken after the assault ... a little later ... after the capture ... For the newspapers. If I am not mistaken with these pictures, the first sides of the London and Paris (and European) newspapers were full of colors ..
        In principle, they almost left him like that ... Since the war almost immediately ended.
        Occupation of this piece of land (even the ruined turret is visible ... remains ... here Istomin was killed nearby and nearby Nakhimov was mortally wounded)
        it cost the Allies very expensive - but the south side of the city had to be left .. Unfortunately Boske immediately rushed to strengthen this piece and Khrulev was unable to repulse it.
        3 The assault was reflected everywhere ... except for this completely destroyed and dug up area .. the force to repulse him from Khrulev was gone. The remnants of the huts are not far away ... they also played a special role.
        1. 0
          15 September 2014 11: 14
          Quote: Cristall
          Do not confuse - Malakhov Kurgan and 4 bastions are completely different things.
          Truncated) I don’t know both defenses in great detail, but individual fragments are stuck in my memory. For example, Ilya Mixon the Sailor Cat read in the school library, vividly illustrated, liked for that age. Many years have already passed, I searched the web, found on some resource, but in order to swing it is necessary to go through the steps in steps, and a little time ....... So the hottest place was on the 3rd bastion. You well know the history of the subject, about the tower - is it in the upper right part? Judging by the photo, it was taken in the direction, of course, of the allies, then the huts from the opposite side, i.e. behind the back of the camera? Thanks in advance hi
  21. 0
    14 September 2014 19: 00
    The views and methods of both former Europeans and current gay people have changed little, except that before the British tried to drag chestnuts out of the fire with their own hands, but now they do it themselves, along with their EU colleagues, stupidly following the instructions of their younger brother - the USA
  22. +1
    14 September 2014 20: 18
    besides heroism ... you need to learn the lessons of that war.
    Hats and sarcasm aside (then they were worth failures everywhere .. only heroism and death saved)
    you need to think and do not need to think that the enemy is stupid .. The enemy is insidious and smart - it is better to think so. As Panin thought about Frederick ...
    It’s better to overestimate a bit .. than underestimate a little.
    And there are fewer hats ... we will tear all of them well ... But it is best not to admit that "we" ourselves will be drained of blood by the "tearing" of all ... Pyrrrhic victories ...
    The best war and victory is that which was won before the declaration of war.
  23. 0
    14 September 2014 20: 59
    Russia lost the Crimean War, primarily financially, the consequences were felt for another 20 years. The next loss is diplomatic, it is clear from the article that the French did not have any benefits from the war and perfectly understood this. But the rudeness of Nicholas I in relation to Napoleon The third, including direct threats like a reaction to a play in which autocracy was ridiculed, after which the tsar declared that he would bring 1,5 million spectators in gray overcoats to Paris and they would slam the play, led to a war without, offended ,, The British hardly risked attacking Russia for their French emperor. If it weren’t for Nicholas’s self-confidence, Russia could really have fought for the straits in 1854. I would add that the allies didn’t just land in Yevpatoria, they seized stores where food supplies were concentrated for the whole Of the Crimean Army. Therefore, Russia could not concentrate any larger army in the Crimea, there was nothing to feed, by and large it was not an army, but a reinforced corps. in Alma 33 thousand Russians fought with 67 thousand allies.
    1. 0
      15 September 2014 08: 55
      Actually, it was the French who were looking for an excuse, having stolen the keys to the shrines in Palestine and handed them to the Catholics, having offended the patron of Orthodoxy, Nicholas, then the spit in the face is stronger than the verbal threat to the frogmen for the play. in addition to Crimea, he rummaged successfully in China, Syria, Indochina, Japan, disastrously in Mexico, and suicidal in Prussia. It was evident that the ancestor’s laurels did not allow them to live in peace
  24. +3
    14 September 2014 22: 46
    The best historical book about that war was written by E. Tarle, and of the fiction books - by Sergeev-Tsenskiy "Sevastopol Starada". I read it as a child. Written objectively, without pathos and unnecessary jingoistic patriotism. The Russian government bears equal responsibility for unleashing that war with its opponents. It is a pity that ordinary people had to pay for their ambitions with their lives. "The war of cretins with villains," said Tyutchev.
  25. +1
    15 September 2014 00: 21
    Immediately I watched a movie on a blog, Crimea through the eyes of Americans, where a novice cameraman and director made a film about Crimea and was told a joke. Two Frenchmen meet on a dog walk and one of the other asks: What is the name of your bulldog. He answers, Sevastopol. He asks why Sevastopol, to which the owner of the dog replies: And try to take it.
  26. +1
    15 September 2014 01: 03
    Napoleon the third did not take into account the lessons of Napoleon the first, as did all the other adventurers. Unfortunately, history repeats itself only with a difference in victims, unfortunately in ascending order. Hitler forgot all this when he coveted the USSR. And once again Russia has taken upon itself the burden of liberating Europe. No matter how it was, even under the tsars or the Bolsheviks, our ancestors always had to pull them out of the shit. There is a general statistic that about once every hundred years our "well-wishers" start a campaign against Russia. They get to come in full, those who survived come back and say to their children: Do not climb into Russia, this is a disastrous business. But as time passes, the fathers die and there is no one to remind, and the stories themselves do not remember again come to us. History repeats itself again and the survivors again tell their children the truth. And why they don’t waddle, apparently without 3,14 parts and it’s difficult to live, well, some kind of sadomaz.
  27. 0
    15 September 2014 05: 55
    Thanks to the author, interesting article.
  28. 0
    16 September 2014 00: 45
    Quote: kotev19
    Yes, then Europe showed its bestial grin to Russia ...


    let's take a picture
    this is the third bastion inside after the battle
    Thanks to Fenton and Robertson, the first military photojournalists. Later, the Crimean War was also filmed by the French Durant-Branger, Frederic Martens, Jean Laglois.
    Let me remind you that the Times was afraid of correspondents and did not like Lord Raglan himself ... All because they openly criticized all that bad things happened ...
    Quote: Novel 11
    So the hottest place was on the 3rd bastion. You well know the history of the subject, about the tower - is it in the upper right part? Judging by the photo, it was taken in the direction, of course, of the allies, then the huts from the opposite side, i.e. behind the back of the camera?

    It was hot, to be honest, it was everywhere. 4 the bastion in general was destroyed many times. Kamchatka was also demolished ... you understand that these were earthworks .. And now look at this

    and there were many such monsters .. and on some shells Belgium could enrich itself (because France and England could not cope with the consumption of bombs)
    and now imagine 50 shells per 1 unit per day ... and then more and more ..
    And an earthen building ... which was being restored at night ..
    in general, all this was sad ... the sailors died ... even it was impossible to evacuate through the streets.
    The chance of dying on a cart was higher than in the dugout.
    The remains of the tower.

    There was a telegraph there (the photo was taken after the Russian troops left, the allies immediately conducted a telegraph to communicate with the command)
    about the bastions themselves

    So photo 3 of the bastion is just from the side of Malakhov on the right .. That is, you need to go for a walk along the fascines from the ropes.
    Here's a bigger photo
    http://igor-grek.ucoz.ru/publ/hronos/1855_krymskaja_vojna/8-1-0-849
    and various interesting
    Please look carefully at the views from Malakhov to the bay ... you will understand why the loss of Malakhov is fatal for the South side.
    And here is a bigger map ...
    marked bastions and locations
    http://ruparis.ru/defense-of-sevastopol-in-1854-1855

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"