In Ukraine, we saw an amazing thing - the Maidan coup was carried out jointly by Bandera and liberals. It is considered: the Liberals used Bandera as a ram. Yes, it is, but how could they come to an agreement? After all, liberalism and Nazism are incompatible political theories, and their apologists should sincerely hate each other!
I accidentally stumbled upon an article of a Belarusian fascist who denounced the Belarusian opposition.
He says that the Belarusian opposition is completely undeservedly bears the status of "nationalist". In fact, it is liberal. For gay parades, gay marriage and other multiculturalism with tolerance. Like, from the "national" there is only "mova" and embroidery. And the sponsors of such an opposition, the Western and Moscow liberals, do not need real nationalists. Liberals lead to globalization, which over time should abolish all nationalities.
Kamarad is absolutely right, but he forgot to say that the same liberals are the sponsors of the fascists. The authorities in the world now have no other people. If you do not consider North Korea, but there is not so simple. Accordingly, all resources are now in the hands of the liberals.
Well, all the fascists and “simply” nationalists are so stupid and do not understand what is happening? Of course, individual politicians are simply phenomenal stupid, but do not think so about everyone.
The fact is that the electorate of the liberals is too unsuitable to bully on the street and demolish political regimes. This is mainly office plankton, intellectuals and the bourgeoisie. The intelligentsia, frankly speaking, is rather soft-bodied, and the expression “don't die for money” fully applies to office plankton and the bourgeoisie. So, it is necessary to involve ideological fighters in the work - “grooms of death”.
This is what we saw on the Maidan. Some liberal thieves used the Nazi Bandera to overthrow other liberal thieves. It's time to pay for the service. But the Nazis - ideological people, they do not need money. Rather, not only money. Places in the state apparatus, the legalization of armed formations, as well as the well-known laws banning the Russian language, the glorification of Hitler's henchmen, etc., became a form of settlement with Bandera. All those actions that led to an explosion of indignation in the Russian south-east of Ukraine.
It turns out that the union of the Nazis and the liberals - situational? And they immediately gnaw through as soon as they consolidate their power, or even earlier?
I believe that they have found points of contact, and quite serious ones. And I mean not only Ukraine. So it will be everywhere, and in Russia, and in Belarus, and around the world.
What is liberalism today? Many believe, and I agree with this, that pure liberalism is no more. Today’s liberalism is really neoliberalism. And what is the difference between liberalism and neoliberalism? Just one little thing - elitism.
And the Nazis and liberals divide all people into masters and slaves. More precisely, into three categories - a few elite, a certain number of “right” people, whose hands the elite controls the plebs, and a lot of “cattle”. The only difference is in one. The Nazis consider belonging to these categories congenital. Born in the "right" nation - you will be a superman, born in the wrong - you will be a slave. Liberals, unlike the Nazis, believe that people are born equal, and occupy places in the hierarchy thanks to personal talent and perseverance. Any slave with a great desire can become a superman.
The thing is that the era of modernity ends, and with it all the terms and definitions characteristic of it lose their original meaning. There will be no more classic "communists", "Nazis" and "liberals". No, there are still people who consider themselves as such, but all this sighs about the past. Liberalism in the years since the French Revolution has changed a lot.
Agree that parents who have a good position in society will always make every effort to ensure that children inherit this position. Yes, we all heard about millionaires sending their children to mop floors at McDonalds for the summer. That's right, “elite” does not mean “loafers”. But no one is going to sacrifice the future of their children for the sake of adherence to liberal principles.
A light take-off up the social ladder is possible only in critical times. During wars and revolutions. After this, the society is institutionalized and begins to “become numb”. Getting to the top is getting harder and harder. Therefore, people so often tell tales about the suddenly grown rich poor people, and the “Cinderella”, who found their rich “princes”. On that they and fairy tales that in them tell about extremely rare instances.
Any well-established society always falls ill elitism. Even the USSR did not avoid it, although the Communists violently reject elitarism. During the "perestroika" we have heard enough stories about nomenklatura "sons." But in the USSR, the process of slowing social elevators was still in its infancy, because the USSR existed just 72 year. The West is much older. There we can see the following picture: a dysfunctional area, in which the police are afraid to drop in, is located one kilometer from an expensive and quiet area, where you can leave a car on the street with keys in the ignition. This is a sign of a very long-established society. Everyone knows their place, and this order is maintained not by the police, but by the inner understanding of life.
That is, neoliberalism is liberalism, which has become ill with elitism. And Nazism elitism initially inherent. Thus, the most important contradiction between the liberals and the Nazis is removed. All that remains is the Nazis' dislike for certain nationalities and non-traditional sexual relationships. I believe that these problems in our case are secondary. Liberals can pretend to be "true Aryans", which we see with many members of the Kiev junta, and the Nazis are to some extent ready to pretend that they have not noticed anything. As for sexual orientation, we all know how many homosexuals were among the Hitlerite elite. I think that the modern heirs of Hitler are not so fundamental in this matter.
In addition, the Nazis are also changing. The well-known Andreas Breivik at the court said that one of the reasons that prompted him to commit the attacks was the desire to draw public attention to his “Manifesto”. This “Manifesto” was about 900 pages of unreadable text in Norwegian, and no one wanted to read it. After the attacks had to read. So, in this new version of fascism, Breivik proposes to transfer Jews from the category of enemies of the human race to the category of true Aryans. Very wise offer! Now, influential Jewish diasporas may not pay special attention to the growing popularity of Nazism of the "new" model, and it is easier to agree with sponsors. And those whom neo-Nazis will hate — Blacks, Arabs and Turks — have already been delivered to Europe.
Why do liberals help the growth of Nazism in Europe? The answer is very simple. Gone are the days when the liberals' slogan was “freedom, equality, and fraternity,” while Protestants found grace in constant work and refraining from excesses. Now the liberals have only one tool for managing people - money. And on the nose - a crisis. Money will be bad. It is necessary to connect to the management of the masses of ideological people. Whom? Well, not the same communists! The Nazis-their people for the liberals, they will not go against the power of capital. In the coming years, we will see the transfer of Ukrainian experience to many European countries and a real renaissance of fascism.
How fascists made friends with the liberals
Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter