Military Review

10 photos from strategypage.com from 7 September 2014 year

180
1. All lit


US Air Force captain Eric Stuxbury (Erica Stooksbury), a pilot of the Globemaster III C-17 transport aircraft of the eight hundred and sixteenth expeditionary transport squadron, controls the lighting of the C-17 cockpit devices over Iraq in the 30 of August 2014 in the year after the humanitarian operation to drop cargo Amirli in Iraq. Two C-17 aircraft dropped 79 containers with fresh drinking water for a total of 7513 liters. Two C-130 Hercules dropped 30 containers containing 3032 gallons of fresh drinking water and 7056 ready-to-eat rations. US President Barack Obama has approved the delivery of humanitarian aid to Iraq, as well as targeted air strikes to protect US personnel from extremists, known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The operation is led by the US Central Command. (Photo by Senior Sergeant Vernon Young Jr. (Vernon Young Jr.), US Air Force)

2. Tornado in Utah


The Tornado GR4 aircraft leaves Hill Airbase to take part in the March 6 2014 exercises. The Tornado Royal Air Force Training Squadron from Losemut in Northern Scotland was seconded to Hill Air Base for three weeks and was used by the Utah training ground for the use of various weapons. Tornado is a double, all-weather, advanced, little high-altitude combat platform and is in service with the British Royal Air Force for thirty-one years. (Photo by Alex R. Lloyd (Alex R. Lloyd), USAF)

3. The fire!


The American soldiers of the Alpha 2 battery battalion of the 77 battalion of the field artillery 4, a the main Afghanistan Soldiers and their unit sighting shooting. (Photo by specialist Ariel Solomon, US Army)


4. Approach


The foreman of the 3 th article of the US Navy boatswain team Jennifer Sahley directs the MH-60R Seahawk helicopter during the landing on the deck of the USS Ross destroyer (DDG 71) in the Mediterranean 16 of the August 2014 of the year. The US Navy missile destroyers took part in the European phased exercise program in the Black Sea with national fleet partners to promote peace and stability in the region. (Photo by 2 Mass Communications Specialist John Herman, US Navy)

5. Red flag raptor


F-22 Raptor The United States Air Force is flying above the clouds during the RED FLAG-Alaska 14 20th August 2014 exercise at Eilson Air Base, Alaska. F-22, assigned to the 90 th Fighter Squadron of the combined base Elmendorf-Richardson (Alaska), has a sophisticated sensor set that allows the pilot to monitor, detect, fire and destroy airborne threats before being detected. (Photo by Senior Sergeant Jim Araos, USAF)

6. Ready to strike at ISIL


The US Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker Air Tanker over Iraq 21 August 2014 performs refueling of the United States Navy F / A-18F Super Hornet aircraft assigned to the 213 9th Squadron. US President Barack Obama has approved the delivery of humanitarian aid to Iraq, as well as targeted air strikes to protect US personnel from extremists, known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The operation is led by the US Central Command. (Photo by Senior Sergeant Shawn Nickel, USAF)

7. BUFF in South Dakota


The heavy bomber B-52 Stratofortress takes off on August 14, 2014 during an exercise to integrate weapons used outside the air defense zone, Ellsworth Air Base (South Dakota). B-52 and B-1B bombers took part in the weekly exercises, working out simulated combat scenarios at the Powder River Training Complex, South Dakota, to help prepare for real unforeseen circumstances. B-52 assigned to Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota. (Photo by senior private aviation Anania Tekurio, USAF)

8. Birds of prey in the South China Sea


South China Sea (August 24th, 2014). The MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor, assigned to the 163th reinforced mid-range naval squadron of convertiplanes, takes off from the flight deck of the USS Makin Island (LHD 8) landing ship. Mackin Island, the flagship of the eponymous amphibious combat ready group, is deployed together with the 11th Marine Corps Expeditionary Force to promote peace and freedom in the open sea, providing security and stability in the area of ​​operations of the 7th American fleet. (Photo by 2nd Class Mass Media Specialist Christopher Lindahl, United States Navy)

9. "Eyes in the sky" return


Persian Gulf (21 of August 2014 of the year) E-2C Hawkeye, assigned to Asam-Bears of the 124 th early warning radar squadron, lands on the flight deck of the USS aircraft carrier George HW Bush (CVN 77). The aircraft carrier George W. Bush supports maritime security operations in the US 5 fleet. (Photo of third-rate mass communications specialist Margaret Keith, US Navy)

10. Refuel and set sail


The A-10 Thunderbolt II USAF attack aircraft from the 303 Expeditionary Fighter Squadron from Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, departs from the KC-135 Stratotanker air tanker over Eastern Afghanistan on the 16 August August 2014. The A-10's excellent maneuverability at low speeds and low altitudes made it one of the most used aircraft of direct air support for the entire Operation Enduring Freedom. (Photo by Staff Sergeant Vernon Young Jr. (Vernon Young Jr.), US Air Force)
Originator:
http://www.strategypage.com/gallery/default.asp
180 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. siberko
      siberko 8 September 2014 09: 40
      +3
      I also do not understand the relevance ... and our technology is much more beautiful ..
      1. svp67
        svp67 8 September 2014 10: 20
        +34
        Quote: siberko
        I also do not understand the relevance ... and our technology is much more beautiful ..
        Well, the review is MILITARY, we must know what our "non-partners ..." are doing now. And then someone can calm down and think that we do not need an army.
        1. Vasek
          Vasek 16 September 2014 00: 18
          0
          Quote: svp67
          Well then the military
          good

          And this is not a beauty contest.
          Quote: siberko
          our technique is much more beautiful ..


          Quote: svp67
          we should know what our "non-partners ..." are doing now.
      2. Dan4eG
        Dan4eG 8 September 2014 11: 17
        +12
        And you strain your brain, gather your will into a fist, yeah, how do you post pictures of equipment that is "much more beautiful" !!! And do not forget to comment on the pictures !!! And then the publications themselves have 0, but then you can shit about everything and everyone and shout "our cooler" is you a lot !!! People like you have one diagnosis, "Russia of the brain" !!!
        1. siberko
          siberko 8 September 2014 13: 23
          +3
          they have better photographers there))) as for the diagnosis, I would have behaved more restrainedly and tactfully ...
        2. Salamander
          Salamander 8 September 2014 13: 41
          +7
          What are we emotional! Personally, I tried three (!) Times to make such a review. All my publications did not miss.
          And by the way, you yourself have zero publications too. So "Use yourselves!"
          1. Dan4eG
            Dan4eG 8 September 2014 18: 51
            -4
            And by the way, you have zero publications too

            Yes, I have no publications! And I have no comments like:
            I also do not understand the relevance ... and our technology is much more beautiful ..
            1. Oblozelo
              Oblozelo 9 September 2014 00: 52
              +2
              change the national flag jujuyusovets
              1. Dan4eG
                Dan4eG 9 September 2014 00: 57
                -2
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWbZER5gcnU
                The action is only today and only from me !!! good
        3. karbofos
          karbofos 8 September 2014 13: 59
          +5
          and the professor also does not bother. he stupidly copy-paste the magazine, and you drool over the happiness
      3. Civil
        Civil 8 September 2014 11: 18
        +3
        Yarik the Wise seems
      4. Oblozelo
        Oblozelo 11 September 2014 22: 28
        0
        Russia has two friends;
        Army
        Fleets: Sea, Air and Space soldier
    2. inkass_98
      inkass_98 8 September 2014 09: 58
      +9
      Quote: 0255
      Professor - obviously a Western agent)))

      You will not believe it, he is also a resident there. True, it is more southern than western ...
      1. 0255
        0255 8 September 2014 11: 11
        +12
        Quote: inkass_98
        Quote: 0255
        Professor - obviously a Western agent)))

        You will not believe it, he is also a resident there. True, it is more southern than western ...

        He has obvious pro-Western Russophobic sentiments. And he feeds us with such nonsense of the Western media as
        The US Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker over Iraq is refueling the U.S. Navy F / A-21F Super Hornet aircraft assigned to the 2014th battle squadron on August 18, 213. US President Barack Obama approved the delivery of humanitarian aid to Iraq, as well as targeted airstrikes to protect US personnel from extremists, known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The operation is led by the US Central Command.

        No one would write who contributed to the emergence of ISIS in Iraq, which Obama did with Libya. And not to quote Western media about how brave Americans are ready to heroically defend Iraq from terrorists. The professor prefers to sprinkle mud on the USSR and Russia, and then he is offended that he is being minuscored and called a western litter. It’s hard for him, probably, when the truth hurts his eyes)))
        1. neri73-r
          neri73-r 8 September 2014 11: 54
          +4
          Well, that you pester (C), he has such a job! laughing
          1. Professor
            8 September 2014 12: 25
            +6
            Quote: neri73-r
            Well, that you pester (C), he has such a job! laughing

            Are you paying me chtol, dear man? Or did you hold a candle when I received a salary from the State Department?
            1. Kulakov_Dmitry
              Kulakov_Dmitry 8 September 2014 13: 33
              +5
              Pictures are good! Thanks for the review, article plus. I must admit that American technology is at a very high level. Only stupid people can not see this! Particularly interesting are their developments in carrier-based aviation, as well as the overall management, interaction, training, and control system.
              1. ICT
                ICT 8 September 2014 15: 39
                +2
                Quote: Kulakov_Dmitry
                Particularly interesting are their developments in carrier-based aviation



                from this photo report. night refueling
              2. Mwg
                Mwg 8 September 2014 16: 50
                +1
                She is beautiful, this technique, but very expensive and a little capricious. They say that with high humidity on aircraft carriers before starting engines on planes, they dry the engines with hair dryers. I don’t know, is it? In the ocean, the humidity is often elevated)))
              3. saturn.mmm
                saturn.mmm 8 September 2014 21: 29
                -2
                Quote: Kulakov_Dmitry
                Pictures are good! Thanks for the review, article plus.

                I join here, thanks to the author for the selection.
                Quote: Kulakov_Dmitry
                I must admit that American technology is at a very high level

                According to the first photo:
                -Fires are really impressive, but the S-17 glider is somewhat problematic.
            2. Mwg
              Mwg 8 September 2014 16: 47
              +1
              Professor, have you started to forget Russian turns of speech? Usually the expression "hold a candle" is associated with evidence of a different process)))
            3. neri73-r
              neri73-r 8 September 2014 17: 30
              +6
              Yes, no, the professor, did not hold and did not pay, everything is much simpler - according to his affairs, judge him (C)! An analysis of your posts leads to interesting thoughts that testify to .......... say so, attempts to mislead and impose your opinion (often so subtly, especially if the person is not in the subject), which clearly does not sympathize with the strong and successful Russia, in the sense in which we, the citizens of Russia, and not the West, understand! I tried correctly. hi Of course, this is just my opinion, I do not pretend to the ultimate truth.
        2. bulvas
          bulvas 8 September 2014 12: 26
          +5
          Quote: 0255
          Quote: inkass_98
          Quote: 0255
          Professor - obviously a Western agent)))

          You will not believe it, he is also a resident there. True, it is more southern than western ...

          He has obvious pro-Western Russophobic sentiments. And he feeds us with such nonsense of the Western media as



          And here "Russophobic sentiments", no need to smack nonsense.

          Those who are not interested can simply not look,

          and if someone wants to speak out on business - he could put other photos, and not be like

          market traders



          1. 0255
            0255 8 September 2014 12: 53
            +6
            Quote: bulvas
            And here "Russophobic sentiments", no need to smack nonsense.

            did you see his comments before saying that I am breaking nonsense? Sometimes Russophobia just rolls over in them.
            1. Vasek
              Vasek 16 September 2014 00: 29
              -1
              Quote: 0255
              Sometimes Russophobia just rolls over in them.

              Do not confuse Russophobia with anti-Soviet.
              There are few more Russians than Rachmaninoffs.
              Yes, he did not like Soviet power (here I do not support him, but I do not blame him).
              But during the Second World War I did not forget to list my fees for the needs of the Red Army.
              And this is just one example of an anti-Soviet Russophile.
          2. supertiger21
            supertiger21 8 September 2014 15: 29
            +6
            Quote: bulvas
            And here "Russophobic sentiments", no need to smack nonsense.


            Konstantin (0255) is telling the truth! I mean, this article of the professor is not specific, but the way in which all his articles and comments are written. He has a completely American perception of reality. Even other Israelis on VO, for example A Nas Rat, do not suffer from such chronic love to American politics and actions, as Oleg Sokolov (professor) does. The professor understands perfectly well that he is wrong and lies to the rest, his goal is simply to convey this propaganda to us. Well, we, arrogant, do not give in. Well, those who do not gives in - he, without ceremony, throws in the Black List "rude and natsik" (his quote). I am also on his list of "rude and nazik". No.
            1. Oblozelo
              Oblozelo 11 September 2014 22: 37
              +3
              LIKE non-kosher food winked
          3. Ols76
            Ols76 9 September 2014 04: 50
            +2
            Well done, he said everything correctly!
        3. Oblozelo
          Oblozelo 9 September 2014 00: 54
          +1
          difficult without trolls like Prof, but boring
        4. Ols76
          Ols76 9 September 2014 04: 48
          -1
          The pictures are good, but the fact that they are American technology ... it's still a military review no matter how.
      2. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 8 September 2014 11: 53
        +6
        Quote: inkass_98
        . True, it is more southern than western ...

        He is a man of peace! lol National feature so to speak. They fight for peace, but earn money in war.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Civil
      Civil 8 September 2014 11: 08
      +1
      Even the dog hates ukrov and armed with f-1)))
      1. ICT
        ICT 8 September 2014 15: 52
        +2
        Quote: Civil
        dog hates


        any dog ​​hates everyone except the owner
      2. Vasek
        Vasek 16 September 2014 00: 33
        0
        Quote: Civil
        Even the dog hates ukrov and armed with f-1

        This Botsik and his teeth can fly more than F-1 fragments!
    5. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ 8 September 2014 11: 51
      +4
      Quote: 0255
      The horn of Western propaganda is with us again))) The professor is clearly a Western agent)))

      Of course this is a provocateur, but knowing your "partner" is useful. And minus without a good reason is not fair. The material itself is interesting.
      1. 0255
        0255 8 September 2014 12: 14
        -1
        Passed by professors 10 pictures from the American site and I will minus!)))
        1. Dan4eG
          Dan4eG 8 September 2014 12: 22
          +2
          Yeah, and frostbitten your ears, everyone is evil !!! laughing
          1. supertiger21
            supertiger21 8 September 2014 15: 32
            +7
            Quote: Dan4eG
            Yeah, and frostbitten your ears, everyone is evil !!! laughing


            Perhaps it's better to freeze your ears than to take a word from the professor! negative
            1. Vasek
              Vasek 16 September 2014 00: 35
              +1
              Quote: supertiger21
              than take a word at the professor!

              I may be blind, but so far in his publications I have just seen translations, and not a single word of statements.
              1. Professor
                16 September 2014 11: 15
                -1
                Quote: Vasek
                I may be blind, but so far in his publications I have just seen translations, and not a single word of statements.

                Of the 464 articles I posted, a quarter to a third are my own articles, not translations.
                I used to write more, now I don’t have enough time, and there is no special desire.
  2. Azzi
    Azzi 8 September 2014 09: 46
    +11
    the enemy must be known in person
    1. 0255
      0255 8 September 2014 11: 13
      +6
      Even without his articles with beautiful photos, I know how the V-52, A-10, Super Hornet look
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 8 September 2014 13: 21
        +7
        Quote: 0255
        Even without his articles with beautiful photos, I know how the V-52 looks

        Duc not from all angles ...
        It happens so they see the B-52

        Or so ...
        1. 0255
          0255 8 September 2014 14: 29
          +11
          I like the B-52 more like this:
  3. evilrussian
    evilrussian 8 September 2014 09: 48
    +13
    Despite the fact that these are enemies, the photos are beautiful. In general, photos of technology are encouraging. (PS pictures of our equipment are more pleasing wassat )
    1. Vasek
      Vasek 16 September 2014 00: 37
      0
      Quote: evilrussian
      Despite the fact that these are enemies, the photos are beautiful. In general, photos of technology are encouraging. (PS photos of our equipment are more pleasing)

      Did Thunderbolt seem to be sent for demobilization?
  4. shturman112
    shturman112 8 September 2014 09: 50
    +5
    The enemy must be known in person.
  5. pomegranate
    pomegranate 8 September 2014 09: 52
    +14
    The enemy must be beaten in the face !!
  6. FunkschNNX
    FunkschNNX 8 September 2014 09: 53
    +7
    A-10 is certainly beautiful, but Erica Stuxbary (if you look in English you can find her photo) is not very.
    1. Professor
      8 September 2014 10: 04
      +6
      Quote: Фкенщь13
      A-10 is certainly beautiful, but Erica Stuxbary (if you look in English you can find her photo) is not very.

      And the video:


      She


      PS
      Delivery of the mentioned cargo
      1. FunkschNNX
        FunkschNNX 8 September 2014 10: 55
        0
        Quote: Professor

        And what kind of construction above the tidy in front of the commander on the S-17? Not a sight I hope :-)
        1. karbofos
          karbofos 8 September 2014 11: 11
          +6
          And what kind of construction above the tidy in front of the commander on the S-17? Not a sight I hope :-)



          mirror for make-up pilot. suddenly friendly europeans fly up and he isn’t wearing makeup. embarrassment. wassat
        2. Professor
          8 September 2014 12: 29
          +1
          Quote: Фкенщь13
          Quote: Professor

          And what kind of construction above the tidy in front of the commander on the S-17? Not a sight I hope :-)

          Displaying information on the windshield, helmet or "straight into the pilot's eye" is used not only on fighters, but also on transport, especially helicopters.
      2. cosmos111
        cosmos111 8 September 2014 11: 23
        +11
        Quote: Professor
        She

        in a helmet and glasses on the whole face wassat "terrible crying you're so ugly, etc "...

        here are our RUSSIAN-JUST BEAUTY, ATHLETES ....

        клик
      3. ICT
        ICT 8 September 2014 16: 01
        +1
        something like chtoli
      4. Mwg
        Mwg 8 September 2014 17: 04
        0
        The girl is beautiful, only D. Psaki's speech style resembles. Is this taught somewhere?
    2. Vasek
      Vasek 16 September 2014 00: 45
      0
      Quote: Фкенщь13
      A-10 is certainly beautiful, but Erica Stuxbary (if you look in English you can find her photo) is not very.

      If Eric were like an A-10, she wouldn’t go to the army! bully
  7. Alexander
    Alexander 8 September 2014 09: 54
    +11
    Better lay out the wrecked western equipment - it looks so much more beautiful)
    1. Professor
      8 September 2014 10: 07
      -5
      Quote: alexandr
      Better lay out the wrecked western equipment - it looks so much more beautiful)

      Was it scary? Motivators urgently needed? wink
      1. Ayujak
        Ayujak 8 September 2014 11: 06
        +6
        You have a large collection. Lay out the same review of RF technology. We will be grateful.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. cosmos111
      cosmos111 8 September 2014 11: 46
      +11
      Quote: alexandr
      - she looks so much prettier)

      Yes, and ours, do not look beautiful good .

      air defense exercises, at the Ashuluk training ground

      from here: http / showthread.php? 99988-Russian-P
      hotos- (updated-on-regular-basis) / page3753
      1. Kulakov_Dmitry
        Kulakov_Dmitry 8 September 2014 13: 39
        0
        No, not as beautiful as the Americans. What what, but the bourgeoisie know how to show the goods!
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. typhoon7
        typhoon7 8 September 2014 16: 35
        +6
        And there is such a thing.
        1. typhoon7
          typhoon7 8 September 2014 17: 05
          +2
          And there is such a photo.
          1. cosmos111
            cosmos111 8 September 2014 19: 51
            0
            exercises in the Far East .... shooting of the Gyatsind self-propelled gun ...

          2. Oblozelo
            Oblozelo 9 September 2014 01: 02
            0
            this is when "MALKA" flows,
            the longing of the Americans winked
      3. Oblozelo
        Oblozelo 9 September 2014 00: 59
        -1
        on the last fota lass, in the middle, I think desperate ... good
  8. Shaitan
    Shaitan 8 September 2014 10: 16
    +7
    Looking at these photos I realized once again that the SGA army is an ordinary army that flies on ordinary old iron. And a cover plane in general is a dubious thing for its money, like a good helicopter it does not have maneuverability, and even more so than speed. Thank you for the photo, and about the pieces of iron of the enemy everything was understood and about the author too!
    1. supertiger21
      supertiger21 8 September 2014 15: 39
      0
      Quote: Shaitan
      Looking at these photos I realized once again that the SGA army is an ordinary army that flies on ordinary old iron.


      Not a fan of USAF, but at the moment you are wrong! F-18E / F (adopted in 2000) and F-22 (adopted in 2005) are "old" planes according to you. Our peers of these planes, MiG -35 and Su-35 are not yet accepted for service.
      Yours! hi
  9. karbofos
    karbofos 8 September 2014 10: 27
    +3
    A-10 will soon go to waste. The program for its repair and refurbishment is curtailed. last-52 last released in the 60th year and only being finalized. they want to fly on it right up to the year 2050, and the first-1c lancer and second-turn. already outdated. Hokai is effective, but only against the Papuans. upon detection of targets, the samol can be raised in no less than half an hour in good weather! which was successfully demonstrated by our pilots who took pictures of the decks of the air coffin.
    1. supertiger21
      supertiger21 8 September 2014 15: 46
      +1
      Quote: kalbofos
      The A-10 will soon be scrapped. The program for its repair and conversion has been curtailed.


      It’s just that the Yankees do not need to spend money on them, because A-10 as well as F-16, A-8, F-18C / D will be replaced by F-35A / B / C. The Americans, as always, go from unification to specialization, this of course helps to save money and facilitate the training of pilots, but as shown Vietnam - universal F-4s became worse than specialized MiG-21s.
  10. Kar Karych
    Kar Karych 8 September 2014 10: 46
    +4
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: alexandr
    Better lay out the wrecked western equipment - it looks so much more beautiful)

    Was it scary? Motivators urgently needed? wink


    No, professor, another pile of scrap metal half of which is being decommissioned disappointed people, especially the B-52 bomber is generally a scarecrow for blacks somewhere in Guinea.
    1. Professor
      8 September 2014 12: 23
      +2
      Quote: Kar Karych
      No, professor, another pile of scrap metal half of which is being decommissioned disappointed people, especially the B-52 bomber is generally a scarecrow for blacks somewhere in Guinea.

      Now I am calm for your mental health. I especially liked the junk in photos 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, not everyone has such junk. wink
      1. gray
        gray 8 September 2014 12: 45
        +1
        Professor, do not pay attention, it’s a huge request and I’m not the first one here who would ask you to lay out Russian equipment, but if there is an opportunity and equipment of the Israeli army. Thank you very much.
        1. 0255
          0255 8 September 2014 12: 57
          +4
          and it’s true, the professor could put 10 pictures of Tsakhal for a change laughing And you are unlikely to wait for pictures of Russian technology from the professor
        2. Professor
          8 September 2014 12: 58
          +1
          Quote: gray
          I'm here not the first who would ask you to lay out Russian equipment

          I do not write about Russian / Soviet equipment. The State Department does not pay me for this laughing (without me a scribble is enough). About the Israeli and other bourgeois lay out. hi
          1. Manul
            Manul 8 September 2014 19: 12
            -1
            Quote: Professor
            I do not write about Russian / Soviet equipment. The State Department doesn’t pay me for this (without me there is enough scribbler). About the Israeli and other bourgeois lay out.

            In fact, the VO is very lacking not calculations about a specific weapon, but a series of articles with comparative characteristics of the weapons of the leading countries in military equipment, considering analogues and stating the absence of such. It would be great, Professor, if you, discarding your disdainful attitude towards us, would cooperate with knowledgeable people with VO and create something similar (this would be in demand by the readers of all countries mentioned in this article). Separately about aviation, light and heavy armored vehicles , artillery .. Maybe the topic will be split up and more often. But it is extremely exciting to look at all the techniques in comparison, and the phrase “there are no analogues in other countries” will inspire respect. This is about your favorite Osprey for example. If something like this has already happened, I will be grateful to everyone for the links.
            1. Professor
              8 September 2014 21: 38
              -1
              Quote: Manul
              It would be great, Professor, if you would, casting aside your neglect

              Where did you find neglect? He praises me to ascribe non-existent sins, I have had enough of the real ones.

              Quote: Manul
              would cooperate with knowledgeable people with HE and create something like that (this would be in demand by readers of all the countries mentioned in this article).

              I'm here on a semi-voluntary basis. I earn a living elsewhere and in a different way. And what you offer takes a lot of time and effort, and as a result, the whole discussion will be reduced to ordinary srach. It is for this reason, for example, that I will never write an article about Merkava.

              Quote: Manul
              If something like this already happened, then I will be grateful to everyone for the links.

              I made a comparison between Mistral and San Antonio. Maybe more ...
          2. gray
            gray 10 September 2014 10: 03
            -2
            About the Russian / Soviet in vain, but in general thanks.
      2. Manul
        Manul 8 September 2014 15: 12
        +3
        Quote: Professor
        I especially liked the junk in photos 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, not everyone has such junk.

        And p. 4 why not? We have a Ka-27.
        1. Professor
          8 September 2014 16: 16
          0
          Quote: Manul
          And p. 4 why not? We have a Ka-27.

          Yes you are right. For some reason, I thought he was aboard the helicopter carrier.
  11. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 8 September 2014 10: 48
    +3
    The photos are beautiful of course ... See, remember the silhouettes of the name. (May come in handy))))
    1. MBA78
      MBA78 8 September 2014 11: 52
      +3
      excellently photographed iron trash ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Marine One
        Marine One 8 September 2014 12: 13
        +2
        Do not write in a glass, ballast. We will protect you from the fierce imperialist aggressors, so that you can continue scribbling on the internet. Bggg. laughing
  12. air wolf
    air wolf 8 September 2014 10: 55
    -3
    All Avno! Our equipment is many times better in all respects! And the Su-25M is the best attack aircraft, in close combat even MiG-29 will fail
    1. Ayujak
      Ayujak 8 September 2014 11: 08
      +1
      Give an example of at least one battle (any) between these aircraft. It will be interesting to read.
    2. Marine One
      Marine One 8 September 2014 12: 02
      +7
      Quote: air wolf
      And the Su-25M is the best attack aircraft, in close combat even MiG-29 will fail

      Laughing for a long time.
    3. Nayhas
      Nayhas 8 September 2014 13: 24
      +4
      Quote: air wolf
      All Avno! Our equipment is many times better in all respects! A Su-25M is the best attack aircraft

      ... in the Russian Air Force ... in other air forces it somehow burns more on the earth ...

      Quote: air wolf
      in close combat even MiG-29 will fail

      Undoubtedly, recently they tried to prove that he and the B-777 could tear apart pieces with one rocket ...
      1. 0255
        0255 8 September 2014 13: 50
        +2
        Quote: Nayhas
        ... in the Russian Air Force ... in other air forces it somehow burns more on the earth ...

        all claims to the service personnel of this Su-25, as well as to officials / ministers / generals who decide the issue of financing their Air Force.
      2. karbofos
        karbofos 8 September 2014 14: 07
        +1
        why can't it?
      3. supertiger21
        supertiger21 8 September 2014 17: 10
        +2
        Quote: Nayhas
        Undoubtedly, recently they tried to prove that he and the B-777 could tear apart pieces with one rocket.


        Why not? Do you doubt the explosive ability of the R-60? Or are it just political reasons, more trusting in the downing of a surface-to-air missile according to the Ukrainian version?
        1. 0255
          0255 8 September 2014 17: 43
          +1
          it is quite possible to hang air-to-air missiles on the Su-25. Su-25 was given the opportunity to carry air-to-air missiles after Rutskoi shot down a Pakistani F-16 in Afghanistan
          1. supertiger21
            supertiger21 8 September 2014 18: 04
            +1
            Quote: 0255
            it is quite possible to hang air-to-air missiles on the Su-25. Su-25 was given the opportunity to carry air-to-air missiles after Rutskoi shot down a Pakistani F-16 in Afghanistan


            I agree!
            It is a pity that our MiG-23MLD pilots reliably dropped only one F-16 to the ground for all air provocations of Pakistan. In another 4 to 4 MiG and F-16 battle, one of our MiGs was damaged, but it safely reached the base. smile
            http://topwar.ru/21611-istrebiteli-mig-23-v-afganistane.html
    4. supertiger21
      supertiger21 8 September 2014 17: 07
      +1
      Quote: air wolf
      And the Su-25M is the best attack aircraft, in close combat even MiG-29 will fail


      Sorry, but the author of such a statement - either decided to joke, or completely unfamiliar with the mat part. No.
      Since when did the Su-25 attack aircraft conduct MIDDLE AIR BATTLES and even win at the MiG-29))) fool
      Minus, sure!
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 8 September 2014 17: 50
        0
        Quote: supertiger21
        Since when did the Su-25 attack aircraft carry out MIDDLE AIR BATTLES

        As far as I know, since the late USSR
        1. supertiger21
          supertiger21 8 September 2014 19: 32
          0
          Quote: Spade
          As far as I know, since the late USSR


          How can you know what is not ?! Note: fighter aircraft (Su-27, F-15) and not attack aircraft (Su-25, A-10) are intended for aerial combat.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 8 September 2014 20: 44
            0
            Google "Su-25 R-60"
  13. Oberst_71
    Oberst_71 8 September 2014 12: 44
    +2
    Osprey in general was developed for about 30 years. 89 first flight 2005 start of operation. A-10 is good, but not better than the Su-25. Who really saw how the Su-25 works on the ground, he will not doubt its effectiveness. The B-52 is comparable in age to the TU-95. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
  14. Lopatov
    Lopatov 8 September 2014 12: 56
    +3
    3. The fire!


    Well what can I say ... Cool. The gun commander has both a radio station and a tablet. Plus, active headphones, judging by the fact that he does not really pay attention to the shot. Ours have such an affliction. Penza analog ride on international exhibitions, they do not want to deliver their army
    1. Mwg
      Mwg 8 September 2014 17: 15
      0
      Ours are training in conditions that are extremely close to combat. There the tablet will not live long. And ordinary earplugs are cheaper than active headphones and will not fail from rough handling)))
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 8 September 2014 17: 56
        +1
        And the American boychels in the picture are actually fighting. And nothing breaks. And if it breaks, then it is quickly replaced.

        Ordinary earplugs are cool. Yes, that's just when the SOB and the calculation is not heard, so that they are not applicable in artillery.
    2. Professor
      11 September 2014 14: 47
      -1
      In pursuit of the photo from Kandahar. The same teachings:





  15. padonok.71
    padonok.71 8 September 2014 13: 05
    +4
    A-10, flying gun. Created to counter the "tank avalanches" of the USSR. Watching a volley on the ground is scary. BUT. What our guys did on the "rooks" (both in Chechnya, in Georgia, and even here and there and here and there), not one "warthog" dreamed of. Anything expensive to see and participate.
    PS: hi 368 SHAP! I am Scala 2. Thank you dads.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 8 September 2014 13: 27
      -2
      Quote: padonok.71
      What our guys did on the "rooks" (both in Chechnya, in Georgia, and even here and there and here and there), not one "warthog" dreamed of. Anything expensive to see and participate.

      Saw, survived, not impressed ...
      1. 0255
        0255 8 September 2014 13: 54
        +2
        Quote: Nayhas
        Quote: padonok.71
        What our guys did on the "rooks" (both in Chechnya, in Georgia, and even here and there and here and there), not one "warthog" dreamed of. Anything expensive to see and participate.

        Saw, survived, not impressed ...

        yes, yes, yes, what terrible Russian Air Force did not impress you, but how dare they not impress you laughing
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 8 September 2014 17: 16
          +3
          Quote: 0255
          yes, yes, yes, what terrible Russian Air Force did not impress you, but how dare they not impress you

          Why be impressed, in fact? If in 1999, near Bamut, even the PAN could not properly aim the Su-25 at the target? A whole major with "birds" on his buttonholes, but even without binoculars.
          If in Chechnya there was a frequent friendly fire on ground troops?
          In turn, the majority of aviation losses in August 2008 are from the friendly fire of the Russian troops and South Ossetian militias again ... That is, there is practically no interaction. Should this impress?

          Or should the Su-25 and other Mi8 / 24s falling in Ukraine be impressed? Falling because they do not have the ability to hit targets without entering the effective fire zone of not only MANPADS, but also ancient DShKs?
          1. typhoon7
            typhoon7 8 September 2014 17: 26
            0
            You browse the Internet and find out that Western "friends" with their high-precision weapons put a lot of their people, especially in Iraq. And in Ukraine, planes fall because they use unguided weapons, for which you need to descend and enter the zone of MANPADS operation and make several calls, this is the only reason, planes are out of business.
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 8 September 2014 18: 05
              +1
              Quote: typhoon7
              And in Ukraine, planes are falling because they are using unguided weapons, for which they need to go down and enter the MANPADS area and make several approaches, this is the only reason the planes are not here to do things.

              And what "precision" weapons are used with the Su-25? What means of target detection are installed on the Su-25, allowing them to detect and identify?
            2. Lopatov
              Lopatov 8 September 2014 18: 08
              +4
              I don't care about Western friends. The Russian Air Force is somehow more worried about me. Why is there money for Aviadarts, but no money for training normal forward air gunners? Not particularly belligerent Italians have them in every infantry company.
              1. ICT
                ICT 8 September 2014 18: 28
                0
                Quote: Spade
                Shovels (2)

                I apologize for the news there ........



                Article
                Losses of Ukraine. People, technology and politics
                voyaka uh

                asked an interesting question
                need advice, well, or answer
        2. Nayhas
          Nayhas 8 September 2014 18: 02
          0
          Quote: 0255
          yes, yes, yes, what terrible Russian Air Force didn’t impress you

          So it’s not so terrible, two RBCs were poured on us in the absence of opposition and the absence of any disguise, they didn’t even get near ... two months later, in a similar situation, my friend was hit by a Mi-24, and no one was hooked either. .. Maybe luck is just ...
          1. 0255
            0255 8 September 2014 18: 26
            0
            Quote: Nayhas
            So not so terrible, two RBC poured on us in the absence of opposition and the absence of any disguise, they didn’t even get near ... two months later, approximately in a similar situation, my friend was hit by a Mi-24, also hooked nobody ... Maybe luck is just ...

            when did the Russian Su-25 RBC drop it on you? And did your friend survive the Mi-24 attack? Did you fight in Chechnya for Dudaev? If yes, then it’s a pity that they didn’t hit you ...
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 8 September 2014 18: 50
              0
              Quote: 0255
              when did the Russian Su-25 RBC drop it on you? And did your friend survive the Mi-24 attack? Did you fight in Chechnya for Dudaev?

              If the term "friendly fire" is an empty phrase for you, then ask Google what it is ...
              Quote: 0255
              If yes, then it’s a pity that they didn’t hit you ...

              Tipun to you ... In the case when a comrade fell into a batch, the special forces (ours, of course) killed four of us, by mistake of course, but to them what difference already ... They wrote off to the Chechens, even put an obelisk near the village of Gukhoy ...
              1. 0255
                0255 8 September 2014 19: 19
                0
                Quote: Nayhas
                If the term "friendly fire" is an empty phrase for you, then ask Google what it is ...

                so they would write right away that it was a friendly fire. I apologize for your comment. hi
                1. Nayhas
                  Nayhas 8 September 2014 20: 00
                  +1
                  Quote: 0255
                  so they would write right away that it was a friendly fire. I apologize for your comment.

                  Yes, here I have never met representatives "from the other side", I confess I wrote a little vaguely and thus misled you. Similarly, I apologize.
      2. karbofos
        karbofos 8 September 2014 13: 55
        +4
        and the A-10 impressed? where did you participate that were not impressed by the rooks? they saved many lives and ensured victory
        1. Ayujak
          Ayujak 8 September 2014 14: 38
          +2
          especially impressive is their excellent destruction of any defenseless enemy targets, which then turn into an "enemy by mistake." As it was in Iraq.
        2. Nayhas
          Nayhas 8 September 2014 18: 15
          0
          Quote: kalbofos
          and the A-10 impressed?

          The capabilities of Thunderbolt, its advantages and disadvantages (which led to its decommissioning) have long been known and are freely available.
          Quote: kalbofos
          where did you participate that were not impressed by the rooks?

          End of October 2000 (it seems the 30th ...), near the village of old Dzumsoy (no one has been living there since the eviction) near the border with Georgia, "friendly fire" ...
          Quote: kalbofos
          they saved many lives and ensured victory

          I do not argue, the question is in the effectiveness of the application. If the Su-25 had an optical-electronic target detection system at a distance that did not require reduction to dangerous heights and the range of weapons allowing them to be used from a safe distance for themselves ... then the number of lives saved would be greater, would it not?
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. typhoon7
        typhoon7 8 September 2014 17: 19
        +1
        Judging by all your comments, which I looked over a few months, you have only the Russian flag, you hate everything Russian and you are not the only one on our site. I'm right?
        Quote: Nayhas
        Quote: padonok.71
        What our guys did on the "rooks" (both in Chechnya, in Georgia, and even here and there and here and there), not one "warthog" dreamed of. Anything expensive to see and participate.

        Saw, survived, not impressed ...

        I’ve been looking at your comments for several months now, you haven’t said a single good word about Russian technology, and in the Donbass you wished our defeat. Are you Russian, or you only have the Russian flag? And you are like on our resource, as I understand it, not one.
        1. Ayujak
          Ayujak 8 September 2014 17: 32
          0
          Why are you so worried? Among the Russians there are a lot of people who spit in the back. One Makarevich and Co. what is it worth. And how many of these invisible underground?
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 8 September 2014 18: 09
            +1
            Quote: AYUJAK
            Among the Russians there are a lot of people who spit in the back. One Makarevich and Co. what is it worth. And how many of these invisible underground?


            Do you think haters are less dangerous?
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 8 September 2014 18: 16
              0
              Quote: Spade
              Do you think haters are less dangerous?

              Thank you.
              1. Lopatov
                Lopatov 8 September 2014 18: 29
                +1
                Not at all. In 1939, cap-bailing got out to us with a big side. Yes, and in 1941, too.
        2. Nayhas
          Nayhas 8 September 2014 18: 43
          +1
          Quote: typhoon7
          Judging by all your comments, which I looked over a few months, you have only the Russian flag, you hate everything Russian and you are not the only one on our site. I'm right?

          If hatred and criticism are synonyms for you, then consider it ...
          Quote: typhoon7
          I’ve been looking at your comments for several months now, you haven’t said a single good word about Russian technology

          I can tell you personally: Russian military equipment (or rather the continuation of the glorious experience of the USSR) may not be the best in the world in absolute terms, but many people reckon with it, moreover, there are only three countries in the world of countries capable of developing it in many areas at once: USA, Russia and China. Yes, Israel is strong in tank building and precision-guided munitions, UAVs (if Che missed me, the professor will forgive me, not from evil), but he does not build nuclear submarines or transport aircraft for example. In Europe, there are countries leading in some positions, but only in one. At the same time, only three countries are trying to develop EVERYTHING (I repeat) ...
          You can stick any labels on me, but today the USA is in the lead in this regard, we share 2nd and 3rd place with China, frankly speaking, there is a lot of ambiguity in China, it is difficult to distinguish propaganda from realities. If you think that most university graduates are economists and lawyers capable of continuing this race, then make optimistic forecasts ...
          Quote: typhoon7
          and in the Donbass you wished our defeat.

          And ours have nothing to do there, this is the territory of an independent state whose inhabitants do not want this war, and the support among the local population is extremely low, which the "leaders" of Novorossia themselves admit ... In Chechnya, for example, absolutely the entire male population fought, even the elderly (I personally saw how under the amnesty, the "colonel" of the Ichkerian army surrendered, an old man already under 70), in Novorossiya the majority of the male population votes with their feet preferring peace and quiet. Well, why is this war, for whose interests the absolute majority does not want to fight?
  16. siberko
    siberko 8 September 2014 13: 34
    +6
    Isn't it prettier?
    1. 0255
      0255 8 September 2014 13: 56
      +5
      agree with you drinks Our technique is better and more beautiful:
      1. 0255
        0255 8 September 2014 13: 57
        +3
        I also have a small collection of photos and pictures, mainly aviation:
        1. 0255
          0255 8 September 2014 13: 58
          +3
          ------------------------------------------
          1. 0255
            0255 8 September 2014 13: 59
            +3
            will we wait for such photos from the professor?
            1. 0255
              0255 8 September 2014 14: 01
              +5
              clickable
              1. supertiger21
                supertiger21 8 September 2014 17: 15
                +2
                Quote: 0255
                clickable


                Konstantin, cool photo! good
                I have not seen a similar shot of the Su-34 against the backdrop of the lights of the night city. smile
                1. 0255
                  0255 8 September 2014 17: 39
                  +1
                  Quote: supertiger21
                  Quote: 0255
                  clickable


                  Konstantin, cool photo! good
                  I have not seen a similar shot of the Su-34 against the backdrop of the lights of the night city. smile

                  I like it too. In the next 10 photos from the professor I will post something else
                  1. supertiger21
                    supertiger21 8 September 2014 17: 55
                    +1
                    Quote: 0255
                    I like it too. In the next 10 photos from the professor I will post something else


                    Konstantin, I think that with the presence of such photographs, it would not be bad for you to write response articles with photos, only with Russian weapons. Not, I’m not convincing, but the article really has a greater effect and dissemination of information to visitors than in the comments. smile
                    1. 0255
                      0255 8 September 2014 19: 55
                      0
                      let these photos be the answer in the comments to the westernized article. All the photos I posted except for VT-T "Atlanta" I took from the site russianplanes.net
                      You yourself can pump out beautiful photos of Russian planes from there as you want
              2. typhoon7
                typhoon7 8 September 2014 17: 29
                +4
                Su-24 also looks beautiful.
              3. Oblozelo
                Oblozelo 9 September 2014 01: 10
                +1
                BEAUTY, just SUPER
      2. siberko
        siberko 8 September 2014 13: 59
        +2
        drinks and our soldiers don’t wear diapers)
        1. 0255
          0255 8 September 2014 14: 02
          +6
          as if flying to Donbass to help militias
          1. 0255
            0255 8 September 2014 14: 04
            +3
            I suffered in the photo of our technology)))
            1. 0255
              0255 8 September 2014 14: 06
              +5
              sorry the professor will not see the pictures from my collection, why did I offend the professor? crying
              1. 0255
                0255 8 September 2014 14: 07
                +2
                MiGi-29 taxis take off good
                1. 0255
                  0255 8 September 2014 14: 08
                  +3
                  as if a picture and not a photo
                  1. 0255
                    0255 8 September 2014 14: 09
                    +1
                    -----------------------------------
                    1. 0255
                      0255 8 September 2014 14: 10
                      +1
                      there is nothing more beautiful than the taking off MiG-25 fellow
                      1. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 14
                        +4
                        VM-T "Atlant" looks awesome too good
                      2. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 16
                        +3
                        Su-24 is also a beautiful car good
                      3. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 17
                        +2
                        latest Mi-38
                      4. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 18
                        +4
                        sorry that he went to the Kiev junta crying
                      5. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 19
                        0
                        not a military plane, but a drop dead photo wink
                      6. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 21
                        +1
                        Tu-95 accompanied by F-15
                      7. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 21
                        +2
                        =================================
                      8. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 22
                        +1
                        PAK FA on air darts
                      9. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 23
                        +2
                        PAK FA with missiles
                      10. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 24
                        +3
                        sorry that there are only 16 crying
                      11. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 14: 26
                        +1
                        MiG-31 ..............................................
                      12. ICT
                        ICT 8 September 2014 15: 49
                        +2
                        Quote: 0255
                        I also have a small collection of photos and pictures, mainly aviation:


                        Well, here’s a constructive action (definitely +), now don’t scatter right away, and if admins don’t miss these pictures, put them in the comments for each professor’s article
                      13. 0255
                        0255 8 September 2014 16: 15
                        +2
                        there are still pictures, they can be reserved for the next professorship article
                      14. Mwg
                        Mwg 8 September 2014 16: 31
                        +2
                        Their 16 ty is enough to destroy a probable opponent three times
                      15. Dan4eG
                        Dan4eG 8 September 2014 18: 56
                        -1
                        It is a pity that he is the last of the Magikans!
                      16. Oblozelo
                        Oblozelo 9 September 2014 01: 17
                        -1
                        VVP said: "they drove out, fired, let him come to us, there will be work"
                      17. karbofos
                        karbofos 8 September 2014 16: 46
                        +1
                        from it good
                      18. Oblozelo
                        Oblozelo 9 September 2014 01: 15
                        0
                        He must deliver the steps for ... and WILL!
                  2. Oblozelo
                    Oblozelo 9 September 2014 01: 12
                    0
                    he would have pa winked gun barrel 57 mm
          2. Dan4eG
            Dan4eG 8 September 2014 18: 55
            -2
            As if it helped!
            1. 0255
              0255 8 September 2014 19: 25
              +3
              Quote: Dan4eG
              As if it helped!

              As if American helicopters are not falling:




              1. Dan4eG
                Dan4eG 8 September 2014 20: 36
                -4
                And somewhere I claimed !? request
            2. Oblozelo
              Oblozelo 9 September 2014 01: 19
              +1
              change the flag! am
      3. ICT
        ICT 8 September 2014 15: 45
        +2
        Quote: 0255
        Our technique is better and more beautiful:


        they have combat pilots and equipment in the photo, not magicians with an air show
  17. Kulakov_Dmitry
    Kulakov_Dmitry 8 September 2014 14: 01
    +4
    Let’s show them Kuz'kin’s mother!
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. flSergius
    flSergius 8 September 2014 14: 03
    +1
    Birds of prey in the South China Sea. The MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor, assigned to the 163th reinforced mid-range marine convertoplan squadron, takes off from the flight deck of the USS Makin Island (LHD 8) landing craft. Makin Island, the flagship of the eponymous amphibious combat-ready group, deployed jointly ...
    ... blah blah blah valiant defenders of democracy, blah blah blah marines steer, blah blah blah we all have beautiful black plastic, and R. Emmerich’s Independence Day is a documentary, and our Mr. President flies and spits with ball lightning fellow

    But the real information
    http://www.popmech.ru/weapon/12791-konvertoplan-osprey-dorog-nenadezhen-vostrebo
    van-rotory / # full
  20. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 8 September 2014 14: 09
    +1
    I would title a series of photos to the article with the phrase: "Do not care if people living on earth want democracy or not, it is inevitable for the elite."
  21. 31rus
    31rus 8 September 2014 14: 50
    +1
    Thank you great photos
  22. Kar Karych
    Kar Karych 8 September 2014 15: 50
    +3
    Quote: TIT
    Quote: 0255
    Our technique is better and more beautiful:


    they have combat pilots and equipment in the photo, not magicians with an air show


    A selection of photos 0255, also not from the museum, give another argument.
    1. ICT
      ICT 8 September 2014 16: 05
      0
      Quote: Kar Karych
      Kar Karych

      see the last photo 0255
  23. Mwg
    Mwg 8 September 2014 16: 30
    +3
    Thanks to the professor for the opportunity to see a beautiful and powerful technique. Request to Professor: dear Professor, please publish the performance characteristics of all these wonderful creations of military thought, taking into account the peculiarities of the approach to them in the dead zones of visibility, optimally effective attack ceilings, optimal climatic conditions for counteraction, etc. etc. In a word, please describe under what conditions and how you would advise them to shoot down.
    1. 0255
      0255 8 September 2014 16: 35
      +2
      the professor will not give you such information bully wink
      1. Mwg
        Mwg 8 September 2014 16: 56
        +1
        I hope that if you ask for a long time and convincingly, it will give out. Persistence and faith in the humanity of the mountains turn down)))
        Article plus set. Informative, though superficial
  24. k_ply
    k_ply 8 September 2014 16: 55
    +2
    The old Tornado looks good, like his "class enemy" Su-24, I don't even know who is more beautiful? The charm of airplanes.
  25. Massik
    Massik 8 September 2014 17: 08
    +2
    It’s already like the 4th publication, and the comrades continue to ride the professor))) Nothing new, I looked at the pictures and I can not read the comments ...
    1. 0255
      0255 8 September 2014 17: 37
      +1
      not 4th, but at least 44th wink
  26. roma-belij
    roma-belij 8 September 2014 17: 11
    0
    Damn, no matter how you open the Professor’s article, just look at the pictures, so all comments from the obser begin. Give a simple and calm look, you will not lose)))
  27. Tyumen
    Tyumen 8 September 2014 17: 57
    +1
    Ariel Solomon. US Army.))
  28. leon-iv
    leon-iv 8 September 2014 18: 19
    +4
    Topwar does not change, Professor welcome.
    1. Professor
      8 September 2014 21: 47
      0
      Quote: leon-iv
      Topwar does not change, Professor welcome.

      Have a nice one you too. hi Just sign this picture. Where, who, when and why ... Then there will be a class !!! good
  29. k_ply
    k_ply 8 September 2014 19: 26
    +2
    Video footage for the 4th photo (part of another):

    Soldiers of the 1st Division of the 76th Regiment of the PA, 4th Infantry Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division, conduct pre-emptive harassing fire from the M777 howitzer to prevent enemy activity in the area - 11.10.2013/XNUMX/XNUMX
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 8 September 2014 21: 25
      0
      At the 56th second, a guy with a device for remote input of installations into electronic fuses gets into the frame. Also the right thing.

      But, of course, they did not think of loading this caramultuk. With regard to ergonomics, we are still much better thought out. A crooked shorthand and two people who work for them are still not the level of "high-tech weapons"
      1. Professor
        8 September 2014 21: 49
        -1
        Quote: Spade
        "high-tech weapons"

        the calculation of 7 fighters on one barrel puts a question mark under the epithet "high-tech weapons"
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 8 September 2014 22: 07
          +1
          And where is the number of participants? When you have to dig a hole and load shells, and seven will be few.

          And so the thing is very high-tech. But loading is complete n-and-and ... It seems that for the sake of weight and compactness they sacrificed ergonomics.
          1. Professor
            8 September 2014 22: 10
            -1
            Quote: Spade
            And where is the number of participants? When you have to dig a hole and load shells, and seven will be few

            And 70 fighters per barrel are even better. Yes? wink
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 8 September 2014 23: 28
              0
              A lot. But who will give so much ...
      2. k_ply
        k_ply 9 September 2014 02: 16
        +1
        For comparison:

        In the first case, for safety reasons, they did not put in advance on the lowering tray (on the right) each subsequent projectile that could fall out during the shot, possibly acted according to the instructions for larger barrel elevation angles (calculation -8 people).

        1. padonok.71
          padonok.71 9 September 2014 18: 32
          0
          Damn it, discipline, everyone in armor, helmets, ours would have been running around naked. That's what contract "babosiks" mean.
    2. Rayden
      Rayden 9 September 2014 07: 17
      0
      Something big calculation for one gun
      1. k_ply
        k_ply 9 September 2014 15: 56
        0
        You will find a 152/155-mm towed artillery system with less staffing, you will be well done.
  30. Danik_Rok
    Danik_Rok 8 September 2014 20: 53
    +2
    I don’t understand why there is so much discontent, just beautiful photos without praise of technology, etc. : /
    1. Professor
      8 September 2014 21: 50
      +1
      Quote: Danik_Rok
      I don’t understand why there is so much discontent, just beautiful photos without praise of technology, etc. : /

      The inferiority complex is the reason. hi
      1. padonok.71
        padonok.71 9 September 2014 21: 23
        +2
        Ah well done, this explanation is super. Everything around is inferior - I’m Don Pereñon alone. With all of mine, it smells of Great Jewish chauvinism. Do not find?
  31. fan1945
    fan1945 17 September 2014 01: 06
    0
    Extremely dangerous moods. It would seem patriotic love and the boast of everything
    domestic in 1941 led to severe disappointments. Especially in aviation ...
    Of course, the ordinary population may (or should) be ignorant, but specialists who, as it were, are positioned at the Forum, should be required to
    as objective as possible. In general, it’s better to overestimate the enemy than underestimate ....
  32. waggish
    waggish 20 September 2014 16: 44
    0
    Finally, new photos!
  33. The comment was deleted.