NATO continues the tradition of the Crusaders and Nazi Germany

NATO continues the tradition of the Crusaders and Nazi Germany

The organization of the North Atlantic Treaty is a direct successor to the ancient concept of "the onslaught to the East", being the heir to the crusaders and the Nazis. This fact is difficult to dispute, judging by deeds, and not by words that can be full of nobility and beauty. After the collapse of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, the North Atlantic bloc set itself the task of expanding to the eastern part of Europe, as well as to the lands of North and Tropical Africa.


Although after the destruction of the Red Empire and the world socialist system, many believed that the need for NATO disappeared because the enemy fell, the “evil empire” (in the eyes of the Americans) collapsed, and its heir - the Russian Federation, showed complete loyalty to the “New World Order”. Handing over all achievements of the USSR, allies, withdrawing troops, throwing bases and property, showing complete indifference to tens of millions of Russians abandoned outside Russia. Reducing the army, fleet, abandoning the most interesting developments in the military and space fields. But the “Russian question” has not yet been completely resolved, and in the Western World Management Centers indifferent to what Russian power is: tsarist, Soviet, democratic, the question is who is the “king of the mountain”, the owner of the planet. And for this you need absolute control over the North of Eurasia and the destruction of the power of the Russians - there are too many of them, God forbid, they are descendants of Sun Falcon, Svyatoslav, Alexander Yaroslavich, the “miracle heroes” of Suvorov and Ushakov.

That is why NATO was retained as a tool of military coercion in the “New World Order” of Western civilization. A new life has been breathed into the unit, with a “club” with the help of which they began to impose the will of the American-European “axis” on various countries of the planet, including those located far beyond Europe and North America.

The expansion of NATO to the east and south was accompanied and accompanied by the involvement of new members in the bloc: in the 1999 year - Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic were included; in 2004, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Slovenia, and the former Baltic republics of the USSR — Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania; in 2009, Albania and Croatia. In the 2009 year, France returned to all NATO structures, which left them in the 1966 year under General de Gaulle. Of the former USSR republics, the “elites” of Georgia and Ukraine show a great desire to join NATO. It is clear that militarily, NATO did not strengthen NATO, their military power is mediocre, the main thing is that these countries used to be part of the Russian civilization, or were under its control - economic, political, military. We lost the vast territories after the death of the “red project”. In addition, the bloc constantly launches various programs: Partnership for Peace, Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, Membership Action Plans, Mediterranean Dialogue, Individual Partnership Action Plans, created the African Command of the US Armed Forces (AFRICOM) . And do not think that these programs do not pose a danger to other countries, Russia - so Gaddafi was against Libya’s involvement in the AFRICOM network, this was one of the reasons for the aggression against his regime, which showed great independence.

During their movement, politicians representing the bloc in the international arena quietly lying, anyway history will write the winner. So Madeleine Albright, US Secretary of State in 1997 — 2001, when pushing the decision to admit the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary to NATO, lied that military bases and troops of the North Atlantic Alliance would never appear in these countries. Interestingly, many American politicians of their ethnic origin are natives of Eastern Europe - like M. Albright and Z. Brzezinski, while being real Russophobes. It was not the only lie, as the Clinton administration (US president in 1993 — 2001) promised that the alliance would never include states that directly border with Russia. It is clear that in Washington they were not going to fulfill these promises: in less than a decade, the US announced that a missile defense system radar would be deployed in the Czech Republic, and anti-missiles and an air force base in Poland.

NATO was admitted to countries that bordered on the Russian Federation; in 2004, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania bordering on Russia entered NATO military bloc. Then, thanks to the “Plans of Action for Preparing for Membership”, Kiev and Tbilisi became active candidates for joining the bloc, have a chance to join the bloc and the three Balkan states that were part of a unified Yugoslavia - Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina and partially recognized Kosovo. Signals that they have a chance for a full "European integration" and entry into NATO have been received by Serbia, Moldova and Belarus. Naturally, reciprocal steps are expected from these countries, especially for Belarus, Serbia is already successfully following this path - the army is "optimized", the heroes have passed in The Hague, now we must recognize Kosovo - the "heart of Serbia", independent.

The organization of the North Atlantic Treaty in 1999 repeated the "feat" of Nazi Germany - a few weeks aviation block struck at Yugoslavia, Belgrade. From 2001 to the present, NATO forces have been conducting military operations in Afghanistan, and the alliance’s area of ​​responsibility has also covered part of Pakistan’s territory, and the bloc’s bases appeared in the states of Central Asia that were formerly part of the USSR.

In 2008, in the capital of Romania - Bucharest, the NATO summit was held, there a number of states opposed the admission of Ukraine, Georgia and Macedonia, and the growth of the bloc stopped. But the development of the programs of the block and the development of its military infrastructure all over the planet did not stop. In addition, non-member countries of Europe were offered the option of “associate membership”. There are proposals to amend Articles 6 and 10 of the NATO Charter: Art. 6-I clearly indicates that the areas of responsibility of the North Atlantic Alliance are the territories of European countries and the USA and Canada, French Algeria, as well as the lands of the islands under the jurisdiction of NATO member states in the Atlantic Ocean north of the Tropic of Cancer; Art. 10-I says that only European states can claim the role of new members of the bloc.

Changing the 6 and 10 articles would solve a number of problems. Thus, within the framework of the “Mediterranean Dialogue”, a program of individual cooperation between NATO and Israel operates. For Jerusalem, this is a step towards NATO membership, which is a long-standing desire of the Jewish political elite and the Jewish lobby in the United States. In addition, the program laid the foundation for associate membership in the alliance of such Arab countries as Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, and Mauritania. If the Western Alliance's campaign against Libya is crowned with victory and the rebel Transitional National Council, which is supported by NATO, seizes power in Tripoli, virtually all of North Africa will fall into the sphere of associate membership in the bloc. It should be noted that even under Gaddafi, who bent his line, Libya had observer status in the Mediterranean Dialogue system.

Another program for the "onslaught to the south" was adopted in 2004, at the NATO summit in Istanbul, the mechanism of the so-called. The Istanbul Cooperation Initiative was used to provide NATO movement to the Arabian Peninsula. Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates joined this program. Saudi Arabia and Qatar also do not interfere with the actions of NATO, but rather on the contrary, these same countries supported the aggression of the Western coalition against Libya. They participated in the KFOR mission (Kosovo Force) - an international force led by NATO, responsible for ensuring stability in Kosovo. These same countries are active buyers of American and European weapons, actually being in full technological dependence on the Western world. In addition, Eric Prince, the creator of the notorious private military company Blackwater, founded in Abu Dhabi (the capital of the United Arab Emirates), with the full support of the Arab government, the private military agency Reflex Responses (R2), the American specialists are preparing a special battalion. Its main goal: the suppression of possible uprisings, anti-terrorism activities, ensuring the internal security of the state.

The leadership of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, including the previous and current secretaries-general of the bloc, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has repeatedly proposed to expand the area of ​​responsibility of the alliance beyond the limits adopted by the charter. To this end, it is proposed to use the Partnership for Peace program and the NATO partnership programs with individual states. The status of states associated with the North Atlantic Alliance can be obtained by states that are part of the Western system, being allies of the United States - Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea. It is also possible that India, Brazil and South Africa will receive such status. In addition, Scandinavian states are increasingly cooperating with NATO: there is talk in Finland and Sweden that it is time to change the neutral status, to participate actively in the affairs of the bloc. Sweden would be a real boost for NATO - the state has a small but well-armed and trained army, a powerful military-industrial complex. Stockholm took part in the war with Libya. It is clear that for Russia the entry into Finland and Sweden into NATO, their active cooperation, including in the Arctic, will be a very unpleasant event.

As a result, we can say that NATO embodies the dreams of Adolf Hitler - the former parts of Russia, or part of the North Atlantic Alliance, like the Baltic, or dream of becoming them - Ukraine and Georgia, or have military bases on their territory (or have plans) block. The bloc is turning from regional to global, which is building the “New World Order” and there is no place for the Russian people.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. LESHA pancake
    LESHA pancake 22 July 2011 11: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ha it's not new but what will be the finale is still a big question
  2. Stiffmaister
    Stiffmaister 22 July 2011 11: 50 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    The NATO bloc is losing its strength, now all European members of the organization are lowering their military budget, thus transferring security to the United States. At the moment, NATO is not threatening Russia, even if it is understood that it is getting closer and closer to Russian borders. It can only be threatened by the missile defense system in European countries, which the United States so violently deploy.
  3. Rico1977 22 July 2011 14: 30 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Oh oh I was almost kicked out of the academy in '98 when I said in a report that NATO and Pindos are enemies to us. Such a howl rose, they were also friends with them then, they were such allies to us ... But in general, the realization that the enemy is the enemy is already good. So get out. And StiffMAISTER agrees - you should not be afraid of military incursions (although you need to be on your guard), you should be more afraid of their cultural, ideological, political pressure on us and our allies. Corruption of youth by their culture, reduction of population and degradation of youth from alcohol and drugs, luring the best minds. Here is such a terrible war - inconspicuous. And they have been leading it for a long time and with great success.
    1. Ivan35
      Ivan35 23 July 2011 20: 51 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well said Rico1977! They are fighting a war for our consciousness - and by the abundance of destruction even on this site (under the guise of "pseudo-patriots") they have a result!
  4. mitrich
    mitrich 22 July 2011 16: 04 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    But I have a firm opinion that the Western European NATO countries themselves are not happy to join such "allies" as Poland, Hungary, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. From such states, NATO itself does more harm than good. And all the aggressive statements addressed to Russia come precisely from them, which is not to the advantage of Germany, France, Italy and others.
    Looking from the side to the war in Libya, the military potential of NATO, and most importantly, the determination of the bloc to bring matters to victory can also be called into question. NATO’s “motive motor” - the United States - refused to assume the main role in the operation, and everything slowly but surely declines and fades. But this is just Libya, which you certainly cannot call a serious adversary for NATO.
    The alliance is dying. And for Russia he is definitely NOT an adversary, so the author of the article is in vain so excited.
    1. late
      late 13 May 2012 08: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The only benefit to the NATO bloc from Poland, Hungary and the Baltic states is their human reserves. Why go into hell yourself, you can send Poles or Latvians there, for this they were taken to NATO. It is strange that in these countries they agree with this state of affairs. Ivan35, welcome! I myself read the books of Nikolai Starikov, a really good author, and writes, counting on a wide range of readers, it is interesting to read and there is something to think about.
  5. His
    His 22 July 2011 16: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I agree with the author of the article. Therefore, it is unnecessary to build "democracy" according to their good advice, as it was in the dashing 90s.
  6. datur 22 July 2011 23: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    mitrich- True, they are tired of solving the problems of their old men, and here these new mongrel bark.
  7. Ivan35
    Ivan35 23 July 2011 21: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Comrades - do not relax! Well, if NATO is not an opponent, then who is it? NATO is Pindos - how can you forget WHAT THEY HAVE DONE IN the 90s? We took advantage of the fruits of the victory of our "liberals" by 150%! We still pay a tribute to the United States like in the Mongol yoke and much more (Nikolai Starikov explained in vain) Millions of Soviet citizens died by their grace and were destroyed by the military industrial complex, the stock of uranium accumulated by the Soviet Union for decades was confiscated for free, our domestic market was torn as a girl - entirely on their profits, they went into all the republics of the USSR and took oil and other wealth under control - they still occupy the consciousness of our former citizens and OUR LANDS !!!!! We - Russians FORGOT ABOUT GREATNESS AND ABOUT THE UNION AND ABOUT THAT IT IS OUR LANDS !!! Already got used to the idea of ​​life in "Russia" - in a flawed stub of the USSR - to the delight of NATO and Pindos !! Wake up - the enemy at the gate !!! And the situation that you think is normal - IT IS NOT NORMAL !! Let's restore at least part of the country and we will remember who the enemy is and what he did !!
    1. Marat
      Marat 25 July 2011 22: 21 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Yes, I also read Starikov. NATO will certainly remain a hostile and aggressive bloc - but for now it will not attack yet - it is necessary to strengthen the southern direction - the base in Central Asia and transfer all the collective forces of KSOR to Kazakhstan
      Then the far east