The C-300 components destined to Syria will be partially used to fulfill other contracts.

35
Components C-300 for Syria will be partially disposed of, and partially will go to fulfill other contracts, reports RIA News with reference to a source in the defense industry.

The C-300 components destined to Syria will be partially used to fulfill other contracts.


Two weeks ago, Konstantin Biryulin, deputy head of the Federal Service for the Military-Technical Commonwealth, told reporters that "C-300 complexes for Syria will be disposed of, in fact, this decision was made at the level of the country's political leadership." There was an opportunity to put them in Iran, but this contract is now frozen. By the way, it threatens the payment of a penalty to the Iranian side in the amount of $ 4 billion.

"A number of components and assemblies can be used for other contracts, other components will be disposed of directly in Syria"- said the source agency.

In September, 2013, Mr Putin said that "Russia has supplied Syria with separate components of the C-300 anti-aircraft missile system, but the supply has not been completed - it has been suspended."

The Concern Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern’s website, which includes the developer of the Almaz Scientific and Production Association, states that “C-300 is designed to defend large industrial and administrative facilities, military bases and command posts from attacks of enemy aerospace attacks . Able to hit ballistic and aerodynamic targets. It became the first multi-channel anti-aircraft missile system capable of accompanying each complex (SAM) to 6 targets and directing them to 12 missiles. ”
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    28 August 2014 12: 47
    Naturally, you can’t cut, not cool ...
    1. +9
      28 August 2014 13: 20
      What a mania attacked some leaders: to dispose of, to dispose of. You can simply put it in storage, it is not known what will happen tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. It is always easier to take ready-made weapons from storage than to wait for the manufacture of a new one. It smacks of frank wrecking in this case.
      1. FACKtoREAL
        +3
        28 August 2014 13: 29
        pictured BELARUSIAN S-300 .... wink
      2. +1
        28 August 2014 15: 40
        In the course of Syria, the same treaty as Iran was at one time.
  2. +6
    28 August 2014 12: 48
    Hurry to give Assad more weapons to fight terrorists! am
    1. +3
      28 August 2014 12: 50
      And why does he need the S-300 to fight terrorists? ISIS has no aviation. Although, of course, for now.
      1. +6
        28 August 2014 13: 17
        so is Israel, an amateur from time to time to bomb Syria. It would not hurt the Syrians to bring a couple of Israeli flyers with the S-300 into this form, this time for military reasons
        1. +1
          28 August 2014 21: 14
          Great Konstantin! hi
          Quote: 0255
          so is Israel, an amateur from time to time to bomb Syria. It would not hurt the Syrians to bring a couple of Israeli flyers with the S-300 into this form, this time for military reasons


          I do not know! So far, Israel is able to gain ass for all its neighbors. But I really hope that we will witness the defeat of the IDF. am
          Well, I also really hope that the time has come when the ravings about Israel's "non-combat" losses will stop.
      2. +3
        28 August 2014 13: 29
        And why are Israel and the United States not terrorists? But for these most important terrorugs, the S-300s are also intended.
      3. 0
        28 August 2014 21: 11
        Quote: Colorado
        And why does he need the S-300 to fight terrorists? ISIS has no aviation. Although, of course, for now.


        I would argue about "ISIS has no aviation"! Back in June-July, it was repeatedly reported about the possession of helicopters in service, taken as trophies from the retreating Iraqi army.
  3. +4
    28 August 2014 12: 49
    Why dispose of it? What, now in the world no one needs C-300? Yes, at least the same Iran to deliver, renew the contract and deliver. And then neither to himself nor to people.
    1. Argyn
      +3
      28 August 2014 13: 15
      Iran has an incomprehensible position, it is unreliable in one word. And the analogue of the S-300 of the Chinese model has long been covering the sky of Iran.
  4. +5
    28 August 2014 12: 50
    It was possible to deliver them to Iran, but this contract is now frozen. By the way, this threatens to pay a penalty to the Iranian side in the amount of $ 4 billion.


    It’s not clear why they don’t deliver. Relations with Iran need to be established, otherwise the Americans will come up again, and the forfeit is serious. Unclear.
    1. ADK57
      +1
      28 August 2014 13: 04
      Iran wants to supply gas to Europe in our place. A knife in the back of our economy.
  5. +5
    28 August 2014 12: 50
    I apologize, not in the subject, but I recently discussed an open letter from the Arkhangelsk Ministry of Emergency Situations about refugees from Ukraine. Continuation of the topic ...

    The dismissed author of the letter to the refugees was reinstated at work.

    The Main Directorate of the Russian Emergencies Ministry for the Arkhangelsk Region reinstated Dmitry Chistyakov, who was dismissed after publishing an open letter to Ukrainian refugees. Chistyakov announced this on his VKontakte page on Wednesday, August 27

    + T-
    “Dear friends and colleagues, we continue to serve for the good of the Motherland! I thank everyone for their support and understanding! ” - wrote Chistyakov. A few minutes before that, he updated the profile picture by putting his photo in the form of an employee of the Ministry of Emergencies. Contact Dmitry Chistyakov by phone failed.

    In the Arkhangelsk department of the Ministry of Emergencies, the Snob correspondent was confirmed with information about the restoration of Chistyakov. “Dmitry Chistyakov was really reinstated last night. Everything happened pretty quickly, and Chistyakov was instructed to go to St. Petersburg to the head of the North-West Regional Center of the Ministry of Emergencies of Russia Igor Panin. Early in the morning he flew there by plane. Now his phones are not available, he is sleeping, ”the department said.

    On August 25, Dmitry Chistyakov was fired from the post of head of the information support group of the Arkhangelsk Ministry of Emergencies. In an interview with Snob, he said that management dismissed him because of an open letter to Ukrainian refugees. The dismissal order stated that Chistyakov showed “disrespect and tactlessness towards Ukrainian citizens who were forced to leave the territory of Ukraine”.

    In an open letter to the refugees, Dmitry Chistyakov called on Ukrainians to look for part-time jobs, to help harvest, and not to "sit in the yard by the bucket with cigarette butts", and not to arrange a "mess" and debauches in temporary homes.

    “They told me that they could attract me under the article, for inciting ethnic hatred,” Chistyakov told Snob. - What kindling? I treat our immigrants like brothers, even when one of them complains that for dinner it’s not sausages with sausages, but fish with bones.

    But the social facilities of the region cannot fulfill their function: they are occupied by refugees. The temporary accommodation center should work a maximum of a week, because even the best people in seven days begin to behave inappropriately - this is human psychology, they can’t stand it, they need some certainty. ”
    1. +4
      28 August 2014 13: 12
      Quote: NORD
      he said that management dismissed him because of an open letter to Ukrainian refugees. The dismissal order stated that Chistyakov showed “disrespect and tactlessness towards Ukrainian citizens who were forced to leave the territory of Ukraine”.

      It is necessary to dismiss these "leaders". They fussed, wide-sitting, covered their loins, and ..., one fig obgadilis. One word-bureaucrats.
  6. +2
    28 August 2014 12: 51
    But who was going to cut them? This was information for Psaki. In extreme cases, a new marking will be drawn.
  7. +1
    28 August 2014 12: 52
    It is very unfortunate that Syria did not have enough money to buy these complexes.
    They would be useful to them in order to repel the dastardly strikes of the Israeli aggressors, and possible attacks from the United States and other countries of "developed democracies."
    1. -3
      28 August 2014 13: 07
      More details about the "dastardly strikes of the Israeli aggressors", please. It is advisable to cite not only Syrian, but also Israeli and independent sources, as well as indicate, preferably up to the day when these strikes took place, where exactly they were directed and in response to what.
      1. +3
        28 August 2014 13: 18
        VO always reports Israeli raids on Syria.
      2. FACKtoREAL
        +3
        28 August 2014 13: 26
        in a nuclear reactor under construction, in warehouses with RAV
      3. 0
        28 August 2014 13: 35
        Look for yourself, it’s written in detail about them (and by the way Israel itself confirms them and does not refuse them, even I would say it’s proud of these vile blows)
        1. -1
          28 August 2014 13: 48
          Quote: quilted jacket
          Look for yourself, it’s written in detail about them (and by the way Israel itself confirms them and does not refuse them, even I would say it’s proud of these vile blows)

          TROLL's typical answer. "I don't know anything, look it up yourself." By the way, why are these strikes mean? Who signed the peace treaty between Israel and Syria? Legally, they have been at war for 40 years.
          1. 0
            28 August 2014 14: 03
            Quote: Colorado
            Quote: quilted jacket
            Look for yourself, it’s written in detail about them (and by the way Israel itself confirms them and does not refuse them, even I would say it’s proud of these vile blows)

            TROLL's typical answer. "I don't know anything, look it up yourself." By the way, why are these strikes mean? Who signed the peace treaty between Israel and Syria? Legally, they have been at war for 40 years.


            Yes, I just don’t feel like answering such nonsense (if you don’t know about these blows, then you read a little or you read not that).
            And the attacks are vile because your state deals them in the back of Syria fighting terrorism, and not for example against ISIS, SSA or Al-Nusra.
            Tell me honestly your beloved Israel at least once struck a fanatics and bandits?
            The answer is no, but that’s because these terrorists and your country (not only of course one) are one company, you are the same terrorists as ISIS, al-Qaeda, etc.
          2. +1
            28 August 2014 14: 30
            Quote: Colorado
            TROLL's typical answer. "I don't know anything, look it up yourself." By the way, why are these strikes mean? Who signed the peace treaty between Israel and Syria? Legally, they have been at war for 40 years.

            there are a lot of articles on Israeli raids that you hesitate to look for links to all of them. So google search on VO to help you wink
        2. +1
          28 August 2014 13: 48
          Quote: quilted jacket
          Look for yourself, it’s written in detail about them (and by the way Israel itself confirms them and does not refuse them, even I would say it’s proud of these vile blows)

          that's yes, ours necessarily proud of their historical homeland about the evil Assad.
          But what a fury they come if they are told that in Lebanon in 1982 a couple of F-15s and F-16s were shot down laughing
  8. VICTOR-61
    +1
    28 August 2014 12: 55
    Although it will be useful in use with 300 and not be utilized, in general, many of our allies will be happy to buy, I think so
  9. +1
    28 August 2014 12: 57
    But what if in the USSR - just to bestow with a generous hand? It would be very convenient to salt US bedding this way.
  10. +1
    28 August 2014 12: 58
    Something infa contradictory, then utilization, then refutation, now partially. Penalty 4 lard green .... too much. I think all actions on this issue will be sov. Secret. Most likely, they will disassemble it in parts, and conduct the operation "Anadyr-2", I see something like this.
  11. +4
    28 August 2014 13: 02
    Syria would be useful now with 300. but the Yankees and Jews scattered there.
  12. +1
    28 August 2014 13: 02
    “A number of components and assemblies can be used for other contracts, other components will be disposed of directly in Syria", Said the source of the agency.

    This is how other components will be disposed of in Syria? about dermocratically aircraft in case of what?))
  13. An example
    0
    28 August 2014 13: 14
    Putin must have promised Obama to utilize the S-300 in Syria. Therefore, there is no war in Syria. The United States is probably still looking for an excuse and an opportunity to start a war. Recycle and point. So the Russian Father said.
    1. Argyn
      +1
      28 August 2014 13: 18
      There is already a reason. ISIS is untying the hands of US aviation in Iraq and Syria, hawks want to bomb Syria under such an excuse. There is a rumor that the ground operation is just around the corner, let's see what happens.
    2. 0
      28 August 2014 19: 55
      Quote: Primera
      Putin must have promised Obama to utilize the S-300 in Syria.
  14. buser
    +2
    28 August 2014 13: 16
    as if besides Syria and Iran there are no other options ??? Offer accessories to other countries, to those where the S-300 was supplied. Although I am an oak in these missile affairs, do the very same Azerbaijan, Greece, Venezuela, Vietnam, Algeria, Ka3akhstan not want to purchase components ??? willow
  15. shitovmg
    +1
    28 August 2014 13: 28
    This is our tax recycle! I have a salary of 7 thousand, from a specialist with a higher education, and from my taxes, stsuki still use
  16. 0
    28 August 2014 13: 36
    A muddy story with these complexes, and they are unlikely to be disposed of
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      28 August 2014 19: 58
      Quote: bubla5
      A muddy story with these complexes, and they are unlikely to be disposed of

      Have you been appointed to the disposal manager?
      What are the dates?
      Say no to do!
  17. +1
    28 August 2014 13: 52
    strange why dispose of?
    get the old man at a friendly price
  18. +2
    28 August 2014 14: 19
    Why dispose of? Better and truly help Syria
  19. 52
    0
    28 August 2014 15: 12
    Yes, no one will dispose of, the time is so fun, well, you have to "tell the truth." On kraynyak mass-sized models will defiantly bang for spare parts. Now there are fewer idiots in the Government and the Army, I hope!
  20. +2
    28 August 2014 15: 43
    Repaint and give to Belarus, will be very happy!
  21. 0
    28 August 2014 21: 21
    And again, our "Israeli comrades" are absent, and I remember even in the spring there was hardly any article about the Middle East, so they immediately started with r.ch. Looks like they have a vacation ... soldier