Mali after the French invasion

20
Mali after the French invasion


After the massive military invasion of France in Mali in January, 2013, called in Western media the “operation to save Mali from the Islamists” (1) and was shown on television almost in real time, the situation in this African country was almost silent. The optimistic assessment of the French President F. Holland that everything will be completed within a few weeks was replaced by talking about a few months, and then the formula "as long as it takes." At present, they have stopped talking about any deadlines for the withdrawal of French troops from Mali.

French troops managed to carry out several successful operations and kill several leaders of Islamist groups, but in general no group was defeated. On the contrary, what is happening in Mali today says that the forces of the Islamists are not undermined, they are capable of conducting serious military operations and gaining the upper hand.

Apparently, it was precisely this development of events that was planned by Paris. On the one hand, France has built a reputation as the “savior” of Mali (the strange attack of the Islamists on the capital of the country in January 2013 was stopped), on the other hand, the struggle should be long and sticky to justify the permanent French presence in Mali. The French troops are not going to leave this country, and the public is informed that the situation "continues to remain restless." The formula is well known ...

In the middle of May, 2014, after a relative lull, the situation dramatically worsened. During the week there were fights between the army of Mali and the militants of the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), as well as other groups associated with it. 21 in May, the army of Mali launched an assault on the city of Kidal (a key city in the north-east of the country) using heavy weapons, but the terrorists repulsed the attack and threw back government troops, who fled, suffering heavy casualties. (2)

At the end of May, attacks were launched not only against peaceful cities and settlements, but also against the UN peacekeeping forces. 30 June a bomb was blown up near the town of Timbuktu, which resulted in the death of one peacekeeper and six injured. 16 August a new attack on peacekeepers occurred: two people were killed and seven were injured.

Recall that in April 2013, the UN created a new peacekeeping mission in Mali. The mission’s mandate, in particular, included stabilizing the situation in key locations and helping to restore state authority throughout the country, especially in northern Mali (see UN Security Council Resolution No. 2100). On June 25, the mandate of the UN operation in Mali was extended for a year (see UN Security Council Resolution No. 2164), and a very substantial addition was made to the mission’s mandate: now, UN troops must “take active steps to prevent the return of armed elements to these areas”. That is, these troops can remain there for as long as Al-Qaida exists and any other terrorist groups, including Tuareg rebels.

The internal political situation in the country remains tense. There is no unity in the ranks of the terrorists, (3) nor within the government. In early April, the President of the country removed from his post Prime Minister Umar Tatami Lee and appointed Mussu Mara to this position - a step at least controversial, given that M. Mara is a member of a dwarf party in opposition. The party has only one seat in parliament, and M. Mara himself won the 1,5% of votes in the presidential election. However, this did not prevent Mare from almost completely changing the composition of the government.

By the way, the May fights in Kidal were provoked by the new prime minister, who went there on a visit. In connection with the demonstrations against this visit, unrest began, ending with the capture of Mali’s military and government officials as hostages. Several people in the city administration building were killed. The Prime Minister M. Mara himself managed to evacuate the forces of the UN Mission by helicopter.

The humanitarian situation is also extremely difficult. About three and a half million people are still in a state that the UN qualifies as an “unfavorable food situation.” Nearly half a million people just go hungry; experts expect that in two or three months the number of starving people will be close to two million. There are about 140 thousands of internally displaced persons in the country and about two hundred thousand refugees outside of it (the population of Mali is about 14 million people).

All this is happening against the background of attempts by the new government to try the members of the military junta, who overthrew President Amadou Toumani Touré in April 2012. Finally, the head of the military coup, Amadou Sanogo, who, despite the obvious criminality of his actions, was afraid to touch for a long time, was arrested. The junta is accused of including the disappearance on the day of the coup of twenty-five members of the army of Mali. It may be established that A.Sanoi’s April coup was not so bloodless.

There are problems in the UN Mission. Although it should include 11 thousands of 200 military personnel and 1440 police, by March 2014, the mission was staffed only with 55%. Thus, for a whole year, the United Nations managed to fill the mission only half! The reasons for this situation are not reported. However, if we take into account the strange correspondence between the actions of the Islamists and the introduction of foreign countries in Mali, this will not seem strange. Foreign troops in Mali came seriously and for a long time and they have nothing to hurry. Especially since the mission is funded very generously. If the annual budget of the mission in 2013 was over 600 million dollars, in 2014 the amount was close to a billion dollars!

Operation Serval should be viewed in the overall context of French policy regarding its former colonial possessions. In recent years, this policy has become more and more rigid. Thus, in April 2011, the French soldiers, as part of the UN peacekeeping mission, carried out a military coup in Côte d'Ivoire and overthrew the country's legitimate president, L. Gbagbo, who subsequently transferred him to the International Criminal Court. (4) Unlike the situation in Côte d'Ivoire, the status of French troops in Mali is completely autonomous. At the same time, they received certain legitimacy from the UN Security Council, which authorized the French troops to "use all necessary means to take measures, at the request of the Secretary General, in support of elements of the UN Mission in Mali in the event of an immediate and serious threat to their security." Recall that Al-Qaida’s attack on the capital in January 2013 took place after the decision was made to create an Inter-African military mission that was supposed to assist the Mali army in fighting terrorists who had taken refuge in the sands of the Sahara for more than ten years and never not going out. The creation of the Inter-African military mission was a clear signal that Africans should not even try to solve their problems on their own - they should act only through the UN, where the main role belongs to their former metropolises.

(1) Operation Serval
(2) See the Report of the UN Secretary-General on the situation in Mali // UN document S / 2014 / 403 of 9 June 2014. C. 2.
(3) There are reports of deadly fights between members of the Arab movement Azawad among themselves, as well as with members of MNLA.
(4) Foreign participation in the "crisis resolution" in Côte d'Ivoire and in Mali brings together another interesting fact. Today the peacekeeping mission in Mali is headed by the Dutchman Bert Conders. Previously, Conders was chairman of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, but more importantly, he was the head of the UN peacekeeping mission in ... Côte d'Ivoire. And Conders’s deputy is an American, David Grassley, who previously worked as a representative of the United Nations Children's Fund in Côte d'Ivoire.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    28 August 2014 22: 00
    ..... and remained a banana !!!
    1. Reasonable, 2,3
      -7
      29 August 2014 03: 12
      Guys, we squeezed Novorossia. And I didn’t even cross the border. It gives Vovka.
      1. +2
        29 August 2014 04: 55
        Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
        Guys, we squeezed Novorossia. And I didn’t even cross the border. It gives Vovka.

        ??? WE with? and Vova, who is it? (I’m not a minus, but I don’t understand ...)
        1. Reasonable, 2,3
          0
          29 August 2014 07: 43
          Do you think that you could do without us? Dial in YouTube-Polite people.
      2. +5
        29 August 2014 04: 58
        Did you squeeze ???? And the men are dying there now. General sofa damn it, it would be silent better it would seem smarter.
        1. Reasonable, 2,3
          -1
          29 August 2014 07: 45
          I got a bastard. I arrived in the Rostov province. I will explain.
  2. CHAMPION
    +4
    28 August 2014 22: 01
    and remained a colony!
    1. +4
      28 August 2014 22: 07
      France for a long time ensured the stay of its armed forces in this region, as was all calculated.
      1. 0
        28 August 2014 23: 15
        The French army in Mali is still better than the local black Islamists
  3. +5
    28 August 2014 22: 05
    Milking the colony to the west is becoming increasingly difficult. To conquer the natives is quite difficult Kalashnikov somehow equalizes rights.
  4. +3
    28 August 2014 22: 07
    Poverty is the ideal soil for Islamists. The West needs not to send troops, but to stop robbing Africa and not only it. Parasites!
  5. +6
    28 August 2014 22: 20
    As Africa was a resource base for the colonialists, it remains.
  6. 0
    28 August 2014 22: 25
    As France was a colonial power, so did ... goat.ly.
  7. +2
    28 August 2014 22: 35
    France seems not averse to becoming a former colonial power again
  8. +4
    28 August 2014 23: 24
    The advanced Western economy that we have been praying for since the Decembrists is based on the robbery of colonies. Without colonies, it is not viable.
  9. +1
    28 August 2014 23: 28
    Quote: rugor
    Poverty is the ideal soil for Islamists. The West needs not to send troops, but to stop robbing Africa and not only it. Parasites!

    The more beggars in the region, the greater the influence of the Islamists. The greater the influence of the Islamists, the more troops are needed in that region. But the troops need weapons, food, and thus more profits from the metropolis ...
  10. 0
    29 August 2014 00: 16
    Quote: psychologist
    ..... and remained a banana !!!

    Mali, the French need the troops to have a source of combat experience .. a small controlled and sluggish war .. soldier
  11. 0
    29 August 2014 02: 44
    Africa today is a testing ground for all types of weapons and all military branches, including bacterological, for Anglo-Saxons and Europe ....
  12. 0
    29 August 2014 03: 52
    France by its actions in the same Mali has become like ameri. Where the troops defend "democracy", there is the collapse of the country, blood, tension in the region.
  13. -1
    29 August 2014 05: 41
    As the Papuans were and have remained, give free rein to all non-Muslims to be killed, so at least the army maintains order and appearance.
  14. 0
    29 August 2014 05: 42
    Mali-Somalia, we have something closer to the heart of the events are taking place! How are ours, that's the question. Does VVP of urkov like "innocent me" do something?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"