Military Review

In 2016, the Russian Navy will receive the offshore version of the Pantsir ZRPK

45
Alexander Denisov, Director General of the High-Precision Complexes Holding, stated that the military tests of the marine version of the Pantsir ZRPK had reached the final stage. According to him, already in 2016, the Russian Navy will begin to receive a complex that will replace the currently used Kortiki. This site reports Rostec.

In 2016, the Russian Navy will receive the offshore version of the Pantsir ZRPK


Earlier, the managing director of the Instrument Engineering Design Bureau, Dmitry Konoplev, reported that a number of destroyers and other ships are already being upgraded to install the marine Pantsir.

According to some information, the two combat modules of the Pantsir-M anti-aircraft missile-cannon systems will be installed on the Russian advanced destroyer of the Leader type, which is currently at the stage of experimental design work. The elaboration of the appearance of a multi-purpose ship of the ocean zone was included in the state defense order for 2014 year. It is noted that the armament of the “Leaders” will be comparable to the equipment of American destroyers Arleigh Burke.

The development of the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile-cannon complex was conducted by the Tula KBP. Its main purpose is to destroy airplanes, UAVs, cruise missiles and ground targets at an altitude of up to 15 km and in a radius of up to 20 km.
Photos used:
http://rostec.ru/
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. VICTOR-61
    VICTOR-61 27 August 2014 10: 49
    +8
    Well done, our designers praised them
    1. master 84
      master 84 27 August 2014 10: 51
      +3
      MIC is driving the world stage
      1. Gxash
        Gxash 27 August 2014 10: 55
        +3
        Great! We must also put on a couple of CLABs on trawlers and container ships of the Russian Federation. And all the rules will be.

        Regarding the military-industrial complex, the clarification is the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation!
        1. Sid.74
          Sid.74 27 August 2014 11: 03
          +2
          Very good news! And what’s wonderful, everything goes to modularity, it will be convenient to carry out repairs and maintenance, and subsequently modernization, and this is money saved!
          two combat modules of the Pantsir-M anti-aircraft missile and cannon systems will be installed on the Russian perspective destroyer of the Leader type, which is now at the stage of development work. The development of the appearance of the multi-purpose ship of the ocean zone was included in the state defense order for the 2014 year. It is noted that the weapons of the "Leaders" will be comparable to the equipment of the American destroyers Arleigh Burke.

          This is even two good news! And what’s interesting, they said there was the opportunity to shoot a paired anti-aircraft gun at ground targets, could they improve it on a sea shell!
          1. Manul
            Manul 27 August 2014 12: 29
            +2
            Quote: Sid.74
            is it possible to shoot a paired anti-aircraft gun at ground targets, could they improve on a sea shell!

            And these machine guns are only suitable for hitting large fixed targets. Even they will not hit a drone. This is not Shilka for you recourse It is necessary to put on a Duet or Broadsword. And the Shell is doubtful. A lot of PR somehow ..
        2. smith7
          smith7 27 August 2014 12: 40
          +3
          And on the basis of trawlers and bulk carriers to organize a partisan formation of ships named after Kovpak! Give partisan fleet! wassat
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 27 August 2014 11: 10
      +9
      "a number of destroyers" sounds like a mockery from comrade Konoplyov ...
      Squad destroyers project 965 - 22 units:
      - the ships were written off: "Desperate", "Modern", "Excellent", "Inspired", "Impeccable", "Prompt", "Combat", "Unrestrained" / "Thundering".
      - sold to China: "Important" / "Ekaterinburg" / "KHANZHOU", "Thoughtful" / "Alexander Nevsky" / "FUZHOU", "Impressive" / "TAYZHOU", "Eternal" / "NINGBO".
      - utilization: "Prudent", "Resistant", "Impressive".
      - unfinished: "Impressive."

      As part of the Russian Navy:
      - KTOF - "Stormy" (repair), "Fast", "Fearless" (reserve)
      - CSF - "Admiral Ushakov."
      - DKBF - "Restless" (reserve), "Moskovsky Komsomolets" / "Persistent".
      Total: active destroyers of the project 956 on 2012 year - 3 unitsmoreover, the "operating" in the pier area, the power plants are finished to such an extent that it is impossible to go on alert ... We are waiting with hope for project 21956 (picture)
    3. Giant thought
      Giant thought 27 August 2014 11: 14
      +1
      Good news! We are now waiting for practical actions to install the Pantsir air defense missile system on our warships.
  2. mig31
    mig31 27 August 2014 10: 53
    +1
    Well, the safety of the Navy ships will be adequately equipped ...
  3. vitaz
    vitaz 27 August 2014 10: 53
    +1
    In the Sea of ​​Azov must be tested
  4. andrei332809
    andrei332809 27 August 2014 10: 54
    0
    good.
    and when will the Fleet get sea-based s-400 and s-500?
  5. 1-Patriot
    1-Patriot 27 August 2014 10: 54
    +1
    Do not forget the marine version of the C400, and then the C500!
    1. Ayujak
      Ayujak 27 August 2014 10: 59
      +5
      Well, you guys voiced one thought at the same moment. Synchronized? drinks
    2. The Art of War
      The Art of War 27 August 2014 14: 27
      0
      So the Navy already wants the S-400 to put the S-400M on new ships!
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. RusDV
    RusDV 27 August 2014 10: 58
    +1
    It is hoped that in 10 years our Navy will become a thunderstorm of the seas and oceans ..... Not a sailor, unfortunately, but proud of our Navy .....
  8. igor1981
    igor1981 27 August 2014 11: 00
    0
    Yes, indeed, in recent years, the Russian military-industrial complex has stepped forward significantly, which cannot but rejoice. Good luck to our designers.
    1. smith7
      smith7 27 August 2014 12: 44
      0
      Work is still an unplowed field. But the trend was positive ... To catch up before the war. The previous 400 years have not always been in time. Caught up in the process, lost people, resources, territory. But there is hope for a good outcome.
  9. shelva
    shelva 27 August 2014 11: 01
    0
    For the protection of ships, nothing can be superfluous - a very expensive "weapon" - ships.
  10. Fregate
    Fregate 27 August 2014 11: 01
    +1
    And the guns will be 6 barrels or how on the land complex?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 27 August 2014 11: 08
      +1
      And where do you put the 6 shotguns there?
      By the way, who knows, is the Duet being tested or wrapped?
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 27 August 2014 11: 15
      +5
      Quote: Fregate
      And the guns will be 6 barrels or how on the land complex?

      and where did they go? and even paired as for example on this "duet"
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 27 August 2014 11: 25
        +2
        YES, I know about the Duet. But look at the stresses this construction has! The trunks are installed in the middle, and in a shell on the sides of the module. As if the carapace did not unfold from recoil, then.

        6000 rds / min. (For one gun) this is not 2500 for you .. again, the barrel survivability ...
        1. Warhead-xnumx
          Warhead-xnumx 27 August 2014 15: 36
          +2
          Quote: Wedmak
          6000 rds / min. (For one gun) this is not 2500 for you .. again, the barrel survivability ...

          The AK-630 has a rate of fire of 4-5 thousand rounds / min, since the duet is essentially a pair of the good old 630, and here you have a rate of 10 thousand rounds / min.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 27 August 2014 11: 18
      +2
      ships need new ...
    4. Warhead-xnumx
      Warhead-xnumx 27 August 2014 15: 31
      +2
      6 barreled, this is ZRAK "Dagger"
  11. special
    special 27 August 2014 11: 05
    0
    Well done !! The main thing is that it would be done efficiently and on time ... And superior to foreign samples ... smile
  12. BOB044
    BOB044 27 August 2014 11: 08
    0
    Who and what country from Ukraine wants to quarrel with Russia and become its enemy and experience our new weapons on themselves. It’s funny. Since the time of Peter the Great, Russia does not want to find out relations with the help of weapons not on the sea and on the earth. True, there were a couple of fools who tried this, but the result is deplorable.
  13. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 27 August 2014 11: 08
    0
    I am glad. The correct use of a successful weapon system. And the savings on operation, and export orders will be tightened.
  14. VadimL
    VadimL 27 August 2014 11: 12
    0
    Great news. Given the love of Yusovtsev for air strikes, the topic is very relevant.
  15. K-50
    K-50 27 August 2014 11: 21
    +9
    This is all good, of course. BUT! What is superior to the "Shell" "Dagger" ("Blade", "Palm")?
    For me, two six-barreled submachine guns will create a large cloud of curtains from shells than two double-barreled ones, in terms of rate of fire, it’s so much stronger than double-barreled ones. Again, with an intensive attack by means of an air attack, the six-barrels overheat less, the wear of the barrels is also less (since the firing rate is lower for each barrel).
    So the question arose at me, "but for x. You need to change the awl for soap" fellow
    1. twviewer
      twviewer 27 August 2014 12: 05
      +4
      Quote: K-50
      This is all of course good. BUT!

      especially if you remember that the shell could not shoot down a small drone with cannons (the "polygon" program seems to be filming), the radar did not see at the beginning, and then they simply could not hit. so urya urya ...
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 27 August 2014 12: 19
        0
        Type AK-630 could? By the way, they shot down a rocket all the same. And what a small drone to a ship, what kind of hindrance?
        1. twviewer
          twviewer 27 August 2014 12: 33
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          Type AK-630 could? By the way, they shot down a rocket all the same. And what a small drone to a ship, what kind of hindrance?

          drones serve for detection, tracking and positioning right? then a little flash is possible and hello ?!
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 27 August 2014 12: 54
            0
            Something I doubt that they will use such fineness in the ocean. The radius of the flight is not large, but go find a ship hundreds of square kilometers.
        2. Manul
          Manul 27 August 2014 12: 54
          +3
          Quote: Wedmak
          Type AK-630 could?

          Why not? At least we all saw the Shell crap. But the 630th, and especially the Duet, I would like to see in the same situation. There is a belief that they will bring down. Maybe the Patsir’s missiles are more effective than the Palma (Broadsword). But you won’t be able to find out without comparative tests .. I’m not against the Carapace in principle. I am very worried about its cannon weapons. How will the Dagger and the Duet plus be worse? In my opinion, everything needs to be tested and the best selected according to competitive results.
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 27 August 2014 12: 59
            0
            At least we all saw the Shell crap.

            Well, maybe it’s not the Shell that screwed up, but the shooter got so crooked.
            There is a belief that they will bring down.

            Well, again, a waste of ammunition.
            1. Manul
              Manul 28 August 2014 11: 05
              0
              Quote: Wedmak
              Well, again, a waste of ammunition.

              Just for ships, there is the opportunity to make weapons with a big waste of ammunition, but with higher efficiency.
        3. Warhead-xnumx
          Warhead-xnumx 27 August 2014 15: 41
          +6
          Quote: Wedmak
          Type AK-630 could? By the way, they shot down a rocket all the same. And what a small drone to a ship, what kind of hindrance?

          My commandant from an AK-306 sighting column (1000 rounds / min) easily hit a signal missile, I think UAVs are not harder to shoot down.
  16. DMB87
    DMB87 27 August 2014 11: 23
    +7
    Asterisk News:
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 27 August 2014 13: 21
      0
      Will the volcanoes change? I just read somewhere that instead of 16 inclined Volcanoes, you can put 64 inclined Onyx.
  17. doxtop
    doxtop 27 August 2014 11: 38
    +2
    I agree with comrade DMB87!
    I do not understand why!? There are quite good systems like "Broadsword" and "Dagger". In addition, they have already passed all the tests 100500 times and have been fully tested!
    1. Manul
      Manul 27 August 2014 13: 05
      +2
      Quote: doxtop
      I agree with comrade DMB87!
      I do not understand why!? There are quite good systems like "Broadsword" and "Dagger". In addition, they have already passed all the tests 100500 times and have been fully tested!

      It looks like squeezing someone's interests and squeezing out competitors for a government order.
  18. Wiruz
    Wiruz 27 August 2014 13: 18
    0
    Something I thought they would do it faster. But in general, how will the Sea Shell differ from today's Chestnut / Dirk / Palm except for the increased number of missiles? Enlighten as much as possible.
  19. Shurale
    Shurale 27 August 2014 13: 48
    +2
    already in 2016, the Russian Navy will begin to receive a complex that will replace the Daggers currently in use

    and the duet? is a shell better than a duet? Do we not see clearly the ordinary confrontation between manufacturers? judging by the latest news, the producer of the shell is now on horseback, and this news will confirm this to me. Were there comparative tests? where are the reports?
    as far as I remember on earth, the torus gave 100 points to the handicap of the shell, but however the shell was accepted.
    Do not we see the same picture on the water?
    1. Shurale
      Shurale 27 August 2014 14: 31
      +2
      look at this video to the end

      unless of course fake, did not check
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 27 August 2014 15: 04
        0
        Missiles themselves are pretty expensive stuff. Most likely, money again intervened and purchased a cheaper system in operation.
        1. Shurale
          Shurale 27 August 2014 19: 20
          +2
          What about efficiency? That is, when we are beaten by tomahawks, we will grow old as they tear us to pieces, comforting ourselves that they saved money on missiles. The consolation is still ....
  20. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv 27 August 2014 15: 35
    +6
    As a tanker, I was always keenly interested in air defense systems, especially in short range.
    Everyone knows that fuel oil in modern combat has the best friends:
    - mother infantry, driving the bearded with "sevens",
    - Pvoshniki, broom dispersing turntables.

    I don’t understand why I have distrust of the Shell ...
    request
    - maybe because he can't fire from the "automatic machines" on the move?
    - or because he has problems with a hit when the target moves from certain angles?
    And it’s kind of made to protect stationary objects and ensure the safety of long-range air defense, and not as a universal short-range air defense system.
    So somehow the good old Tungusochka (in the column), and the TOP (in the bushes) is closer to the body.

    Immediately apologize for my amateurism in this matter. Can air defense workers clarify situevina?
    ............................................

    And a curious question to the warhead seafarers responsible for the air defense umbrella:

    - Why are two double-barreled barrels better than two six-barreled barrels of the previous ZRAKs? The "cloud" will not be as dense as the "extreme" line of the ship's air defense ...

    Specialists, explain, please ...

    Just for a smile:
  21. Hitrovan07
    Hitrovan07 27 August 2014 21: 23
    +1
    Russia is a maritime / NOT a maritime power - our continent can wait for class 1 ships. Then, while waiting, it is necessary to saturate the "continental empire" with coastal, island airports and rocket launchers. Better late than never.