Military Review

The USA does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile

77
The shortage of funds threatened the development of a new American intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM): the project to replace Minuteman III could be frozen for two years, the newspaper said "Sight" with reference to Nextgov.

The USA does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile


It is noted that this is a small amount by the Pentagon standards - 28 million dollars, but they are needed to purchase equipment in the laboratory, which is testing and developing "new solid-state elements that are considered key for the future missile guidance system."

It is planned that the new missiles, called the "strategic ground-based deterrence potential," will come to replace Minuteman by the year 2030. According to the plans of the American command, instead of 450, the current ICBMs will deploy around 420 new ones.

The lack of funds for the development of new missiles is due to the diversion of "the mentioned 28 million dollars to other needs in the 2014 fiscal year and the absence of a departmental request for the allocation of these funds in the 2015 fiscal year by internal divisions in the Air Force."

“If the laboratory does not receive equipment from the state requested by each of the contractors Boeing, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin, none of these three companies is expected to invest their own funds in the militarization of ready-made commercial solid-state guidance technology widely used in modern aviation and rocket technology, ”notes Nextgov.

Minuteman III is a three-stage solid propellant ballistic missile with a maximum range of damage of more than 9 thousands of kilometers and a circular probable deviation of about 200 meters. Its launch weight is 35 tons, length is 18.2 m, and the maximum case diameter is 1.67 m. The missile can carry from the 1 nuclear warhead of the Mk21 type to the 3 of the Mkl2 or Mkl2A type. In addition, in the head part there is a complex of means for overcoming missile defense.
Photos used:
www.airforce-technology.com
77 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 21 August 2014 13: 14
    +10
    Interestingly, they are so actively developing all kinds of crap from conventional weapons, and they have completely launched nuclear. Do they seriously believe that in no case will anyone use it? request
    1. Oleg Sobol
      Oleg Sobol 21 August 2014 13: 16
      +35
      And the world will somehow calmly survive the absence of this "toy" ...
      Think more about people ...
      1. Daniel
        Daniel 21 August 2014 13: 18
        +7
        The USA does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile

        Lobbyists will scare Congress for a long time with terrible Russian / Chinese / Iranian missiles and rub that there are only enemies around, but in the end they will allocate money for development. yes
        1. alexng
          alexng 21 August 2014 13: 38
          +2
          Just the amount is very small for kickbacks. they block it in the hope that the figure will be changed by an order of magnitude upward. They have sawers still - odd ours.
        2. armageddon
          armageddon 21 August 2014 13: 42
          +2
          Hmm ... Damn, of course there is money ... But the glove compartment in the enemy’s camp ... Damn nice !!!
          1. lexxxus
            lexxxus 21 August 2014 13: 52
            +3
            Look what you want:

            US suggested that Russia discuss implementation of the INF Treaty
            21.08.2014 - 13: 35
            The deputy head of the press service of the US State Department, Marie Harf, said that Washington had invited Moscow to discuss at the highest level the implementation of the agreement on the elimination of medium and short-range missiles (INF).

            http://www.segodnia.ru/news/145621
          2. KazaK Bo
            KazaK Bo 21 August 2014 15: 24
            0
            Hmm ... Damn, of course there is money ...

            How many times Ukropov was supported ... In response, UKROPIA WILL HELP ... KALOMOISKY or PARASHENKO from their personals will be thrown ... as a token of special gratitude for the mercy of their persons ....
      2. inkass_98
        inkass_98 21 August 2014 14: 13
        -6
        Quote: Oleg Sobol
        Think more about people ...

        I advise you to think about yourself - about attempts to hold marches in Russia on federalization of regions. They were supposed to pass 17.08.2014 in Novosibirsk, Krasnodar and in some places. So the enemies are by no means slumbering, the next time they plan to gather in 5.10.2014. This is such a squiggle ...
        http://yug.svpressa.ru/society/article/95666/
        1. greshnik80
          greshnik80 21 August 2014 14: 23
          +5
          The point is in these marches, if Russia is a federation anyway?
        2. bergberg
          bergberg 21 August 2014 14: 27
          +3
          Ethnic Kuban will trample all dill and zapadentsii! How many young people fell in western dill, and how many more are on the way? According to the plans of the EU, it is possible to completely eliminate the entire western Bandera dill from the face of the Earth, and the youth of the eastern part have moved to Russia for the duration of the fighting and are waiting. To populate all Ukraine with Russian Ukrainians. Salo you!
        3. Sour
          Sour 21 August 2014 14: 32
          0
          In the Kuban ethnic Ukrainians less than 2%.
          Although, of course, Kiev propaganda believes otherwise. But these are her problems.
        4. Gecko
          Gecko 21 August 2014 14: 52
          +1
          Teach materiel ignoramus, Russia and so FEDERATION !!!
        5. a52333
          a52333 21 August 2014 18: 37
          +1
          Kuban, Rostov region seen enough of refugees. They have it not by the box, but before their eyes.
          And do you really think that someone in their right mind and sober memory will want to join the madhouse, from where hundreds of thousands are fleeing?
          There is no gas, coal too. Kuev without hot water for a month. And well-fed, rich Kuban will join? Something I do not believe, and you do not peck at ukrovsky jokes.
      3. Oleg Sobol
        Oleg Sobol 21 August 2014 19: 14
        0
        Second African American Rap! GDP, gaining momentum ERS in Black Russia! bully

    2. mamont5
      mamont5 21 August 2014 13: 16
      +3
      And everything is simple - the project budget does not take into account the "saw" money, and without this, not a single project in the United States can handle.
      1. nvv
        nvv 21 August 2014 13: 28
        +1
        Quote: mamont5
        And everything is simple - the project budget does not take into account the "saw" money, and without this, not a single project in the United States can handle.
    3. Момент
      Момент 21 August 2014 13: 16
      +3
      How terrorist organizations cease to finance and color revolutions you look, money will appear.
      1. Sid.74
        Sid.74 21 August 2014 13: 22
        +1
        It is noted that we are talking about a small sum by the standards of the Pentagon - 28 million dollars

        It smells like kerosene, if they can’t allocate 28 lyamas to the laboratory, they need to think hard, or maybe the king is naked! They invested 35 billion in F-400 and postponed the adoption for service at the end of the 18 of the year! what
    4. Giant thought
      Giant thought 21 August 2014 13: 17
      +6
      Let the Pentagon have more financial troubles.
    5. St Petrov
      St Petrov 21 August 2014 13: 21
      0
      believe in yourself (s)
    6. patsantre
      patsantre 21 August 2014 13: 26
      0
      Somehow looking at their SSGN and SLBMs such an impression does not arise.
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 21 August 2014 17: 34
        +1
        Quote: patsantre
        Somehow looking at their SSGN and SLBMs such an impression does not arise.

        Anton, what about sea-based ICBMs? But here they also have problems ...
        So, friend Horatio, not everything is smooth "in the kingdom of Denmark".
    7. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 21 August 2014 13: 42
      +6
      It is planned that the new missiles, called the "strategic ground-based containment potential," will come to replace the Minuteman by 2030.
      USA, it was 2030 smile
      1. kodxnumx
        kodxnumx 21 August 2014 14: 23
        +1
        They can’t recognize that it’s just a green paper called a shaft in their shaft, but with the brains there is a problem who creates such rockets!
    8. Smol79
      Smol79 21 August 2014 14: 28
      +1
      Perhaps the experts are all retired, there is no one to do nuclear weapons.
    9. clidon
      clidon 21 August 2014 21: 18
      0
      Because nuclear is practically useless. Only scarecrows, but for scarecrows, they generally have enough strength.
  2. Pro100Igor
    Pro100Igor 21 August 2014 13: 16
    +16
    Let’s impose more sanctions, then bread isn’t enough.
  3. bmv04636
    bmv04636 21 August 2014 13: 17
    +3
    right why do they need ICBMs because they have a Gaussian laser gun
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 21 August 2014 13: 21
      +3
      Quote: bmv04636
      right why do they need ICBMs because they have a Gaussian laser gun


      and they also have pulse ...
      1. MBA78
        MBA78 21 August 2014 13: 46
        0
        Better invent an anti-gravity ...
  4. Tumbler
    Tumbler 21 August 2014 13: 18
    +5
    5 billion for Dill is not a problem, but 28 million a problem? Strange ...
    1. Midshipman
      Midshipman 21 August 2014 13: 24
      0
      Wrong amount to cut ....
    2. kolyhalovs
      kolyhalovs 21 August 2014 13: 29
      +1
      The lack of funds for the development of new missiles is explained by the diversion of the aforementioned $ 28 million to other needs in fiscal 2014 and the lack of a departmental request for the allocation of these funds in fiscal 2015 by internal strife in the Air Force


      So they don’t have enough money, they don’t have enough brains. The article is incorrectly named.
    3. Sour
      Sour 21 August 2014 13: 52
      +1
      Quote: Tumbler
      5 billion for Dill is not a problem,

      Please read more about this amount. I hear it for the first time.
      So far, the 2nd tranche for Ukropia has not been allocated, it will only be discussed in September. And in this tranche, 1,5 billion, not five. And there will be mostly not cash, but SDR - special drawing rights, non-cash dollars for use in international payments.
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 21 August 2014 13: 57
        0
        Quote: Sour
        Please read more about this amount. I hear it for the first time.
        So far, the 2nd tranche for Ukropia has not been allocated

        I suspect that man meant the means for democratization.
        1. Sour
          Sour 21 August 2014 14: 09
          0
          Quote: Vladimirets
          I suspect that man meant the means for democratization.

          Is that what Ms. Nuland voiced?
          Believe her more. She also needs to report to someone. Surely the bulk of these 5 billion allocated under various articles (as is customary in the United States when it comes to covert operations) was safely stolen by herself and her amer- and ukro-wards. And even more likely, this amount was not there, even close. US spending on covert operations is hidden in various budget lines and is virtually unverifiable. This system developed even before WWII.
          The Pentagon has been cutting its budget for the third year in a row. What are the billions for Ukraine? And what is the "Fed printing press"? In fact, the US is now counting every cent. Remember how they recently got into a government crisis over a budget conflict. If they did not have these problems, the Ukrainians would have fought in the Donbass for a long time with the latest American weapons. It's more complicated.
  5. vorobey
    vorobey 21 August 2014 13: 18
    +2
    sorry 28 or 29 million. The difference is awesome for their Xerox ...

    all the grandmothers Ukrainians ate ... and prosrali ...
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 21 August 2014 13: 38
      +3
      Quote: vorobey
      all the grandmothers Ukrainians ate ... and prosrali ...

      And not only money, but also Ukraine .. Sanya, hi !
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 21 August 2014 14: 05
        +2
        Quote: Tersky
        Quote: vorobey
        all the grandmothers Ukrainians ate ... and prosrali ...

        And not only money, but also Ukraine .. Sanya, hi !


        Hello Victor ... good
  6. Alexey M
    Alexey M 21 August 2014 13: 19
    +6
    The United States does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile.
    We can fit a couple .... On their own wink
  7. Tyomaniator
    Tyomaniator 21 August 2014 13: 19
    +3
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Do they seriously believe that in no case will anyone use it? request

    Apparently, they hoped that they would always be able to not bring it to use. Until recently, this hope even seemed quite reasonable, but then their brains refused, and they decided to run into problems with Russia again ...
  8. gandalf
    gandalf 21 August 2014 13: 20
    +2
    ProsraliPolymers! laughing
  9. Pro100Igor
    Pro100Igor 21 August 2014 13: 20
    +2
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Interestingly, they are so actively developing all kinds of crap from conventional weapons, and they have completely launched nuclear. Do they seriously believe that in no case will anyone use it? request

    In any case, nuclear weapons are seen as deterrence weapons. Nevertheless, it must be combat, so the main thing is carriers. And here we are ahead of the rest. In short, the Americans once again disgraced.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 21 August 2014 13: 46
      0
      Quote: Pro100
      In any case, nuclear weapons are seen as deterrence weapons. Nevertheless, it must be combat, so the main thing is carriers.

      Naturally, if I have a nuclear bomb, but I need to carry it to the destination on a donkey, what it is, what not, is the same.
  10. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 21 August 2014 13: 20
    +1
    But interestingly, no one writes where they use our rocket engines? wassat
    1. VadimL
      VadimL 21 August 2014 13: 29
      0
      On the Antares rockets.
      1. MBA78
        MBA78 21 August 2014 13: 49
        0
        But interestingly, no one writes where they use our rocket engines?
        collectors enthusiasts outbid
  11. Wolka
    Wolka 21 August 2014 13: 21
    0
    soon the Yankees will have nothing to eat, there will be no time for rockets ...
  12. Pro100Igor
    Pro100Igor 21 August 2014 13: 22
    +1
    Quote: VNP1958PVN
    But interestingly, no one writes where they use our rocket engines? wassat

    Trampolines are heated. laughing
  13. Siberian
    Siberian 21 August 2014 13: 22
    0
    The USA does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile
    May the whole world chip in, and help poor Americans winked
  14. RusDV
    RusDV 21 August 2014 13: 22
    +2
    The USA does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile

    What? Absolutely, absolutely no money ....... even a small jar ........
    Well, get along. Pridurkam missiles are not toys ......
  15. Wiruz
    Wiruz 21 August 2014 13: 24
    +2
    They go crazy. All of them are developing. This is just another duck, they say bad Russia is collecting a missile so that we can shoot at the South Pole, and we are good at concentrating on the missile defense system. For this, Russia does not like us. GDP in Munich said it knew that the States were actively working on a new ICBM, they simply did not tell anyone. bully
    1. mojohed2012
      mojohed2012 21 August 2014 13: 39
      0
      And I agree - 100pudovo have hidden developments. That F-35 still not adopted, and already in the troops put more than a hundred. Also of the type - under-tested. This is from the opera about dill: the new body armor and helmets of the ukroarmiya from Kolomoysky are beautiful in appearance, inside of the tin that the Indian arrow will pierce. So the United States supplied equipment without adoption - is fraught with losses and uncertainty in military use.
  16. Gorbtk
    Gorbtk 21 August 2014 13: 25
    0
    Nuclear weapons are deterrence weapons. The aggressors do not really need it ... The axiom is confirmed. SGA - treacherous aggressors, locusts - no matter how much they all eat up ..
  17. el.krokodil
    el.krokodil 21 August 2014 13: 26
    +1
    Quote: Alexey M
    The United States does not have enough money for a new ballistic missile.
    We can fit a couple .... On their own wink
    they need-420pcs laughing Sorry for the ... partners ... laughing
  18. Wiruz
    Wiruz 21 August 2014 13: 26
    0
    I can take them fifty dollars laughing
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 21 August 2014 13: 28
      +4
      Quote: Wiruz
      I can take them fifty dollars laughing


      Worm ... I already sent two hundred green faxes ...
      1. mojohed2012
        mojohed2012 21 August 2014 13: 41
        0
        But I don’t give a dime ... I won’t give a penny, even though a penny was lying at the bottom of the wallet after they were withdrawn from circulation. Let the Chernoros be asked to support the army from the Putin threat.
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 21 August 2014 13: 50
          +3
          But I don’t give a dime ... I won’t give a penny, even though a penny was lying at the bottom of the wallet after they were withdrawn from circulation.

          You at the bottom of the wallet look for a better sense of humor
  19. RUSOIVAN
    RUSOIVAN 21 August 2014 13: 27
    +1
    Nothing pleases us more than the failure of the "comrades"!
    1. MBA78
      MBA78 21 August 2014 13: 52
      0
      Nothing pleases us more than the failure of the "comrades"!
      especially "PARTNERS"
  20. Belopolyak
    Belopolyak 21 August 2014 13: 28
    0
    They will find, unfortunately. I very much doubt that a strategically important program will be frozen. Although intelligence may have told them that it would take two years to slam the necessary information for further development?
  21. Mooh
    Mooh 21 August 2014 13: 28
    -1
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Interestingly, they are so actively developing all kinds of crap from conventional weapons, and they have completely launched nuclear. Do they seriously believe that in no case will anyone use it? request

    Well, they seem to be ahead so seriously. Gorbi and Nikolic very seriously cut our strategic nuclear forces. So they do not deliver and missile defense.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 21 August 2014 13: 49
      0
      Quote: MooH
      Well, they seem to be ahead so seriously.

      You think? And in what?
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 August 2014 17: 26
      +3
      Quote: MooH
      Well, they seem to be ahead so seriously.

      Not on ICBMs. On them, the Americans are sitting on the Minutemen-3 (450ed), if the memory does not change. And 20 years of our collapse, they tried to break ahead in MBT, KR, exotic (electromagnetic, laser, stealth, etc.). Then they tried to convince us that tactical nuclear weapons had outlived their lives, and against the ICBMs (heavy, such as the Voivode) they deployed Euro-ballistic missile defense, with elements of ground (RP, CR) and sea (Aegis) bases.
      But we switched to solid-fuel Poplar, Yarsy, R-26, and they were blown away. Tk short OUT, flat trajectory, maneuvering BB, missile defense system put an end to their multi-billion dollar attempts. And the heavy Sarmat generally excludes their missile defense system: the routes lie outside the affected area. The experience in creating global ICBMs turned out to be invaluable! So, amers will have to look for an answer to our proposals of "hand and heart".
      Quote: MooH
      So they do not deliver and missile defense.
      Euro PRO - a thing with a double bottom. Anti-missiles are loaded (transported and stored) in TPU, and what is loaded there, only the GC on the theater of operations is known. Our rumored that instead of SAM in the TPK, you can load the ballistic missile defense to deliver a preemptive strike. They pressed Amers, they were forced to remove BlockNUMX. But ours informed the US allies that they are now on the list of priority nuclear weapons. They are sick.
      But this is "not over yet." On the agenda is withdrawal from the INF Treaty. Therefore, even ICBMs will not be spent on them. Iskander-M is enough. Sorry for the fools, but they are to blame. bully
  22. Zubrminsk
    Zubrminsk 21 August 2014 13: 31
    0
    Yes ... here it is "decaying capitalism" (c). America - one Oooh huge MMM (financial pyramid) - someday must collapse.
  23. VadimL
    VadimL 21 August 2014 13: 32
    0
    They will find money for a rocket. As a last resort, Lamb will sit down with a hat at the White House and gather up. "Good people, apply for a new ICBM!"
  24. pvv113
    pvv113 21 August 2014 13: 36
    +3
    Quote: Tumbler
    5 billion for Dill is not a problem, but 28 million a problem? Strange ...

    These 28 million were included in those 5 billion.
  25. RusDV
    RusDV 21 August 2014 13: 39
    0
    They will bring Russia to sin ...... with their developments .... they would think about ecology! ... on the American continent ... endemic, damn it ...
  26. Kidey
    Kidey 21 August 2014 13: 39
    0
    It is planned that the new missiles, called the “strategic ground-based containment potential”, will come to replace the Minuteman by HAAAAA by 2030, but will they survive until this time ???
  27. Associate Professor
    Associate Professor 21 August 2014 13: 40
    0
    I think the point here is not the lack of money, but the US’s reluctance to spend tens of billions of dollars on missiles they do not need. Will explain. The US is trying to gain military superiority over Russia, and the ICBMs are not suitable for this. And for nuclear deterrence, they have 14 Ohio boats with 24 Trident-2 missiles on each and another 4 Ohio with 154 Tomahawg missiles. Enough for them. They will now focus on a disarming strike, and for this they will under the guise of deploying missiles near our borders
  28. netwalker1904
    netwalker1904 21 August 2014 13: 41
    0
    If America does not have enough money for its defense industry, which occupies about 60 percent of the budget, then its affairs are very bad ...
    And there she and the road ..! wink
  29. flSergius
    flSergius 21 August 2014 13: 51
    0
    Let the frame be called Dr. O and rap in the subway passage laughing More profitable than going to work, inf 146%
  30. Vend
    Vend 21 August 2014 13: 56
    0
    There is nothing to spend money on failed projects in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Ukraine. Then enough money. wink
  31. Explore
    Explore 21 August 2014 14: 08
    +1
    US authorities have proposed to Russia to discuss the implementation of the agreement on the elimination of medium and short-range missiles at the highest level. This was during a briefing for reporters said the representative of the White House, Marie Harf.

    “We notified Russia of our desire and readiness to hold bilateral talks at the highest level,” Harf said. She expressed the wish that during the negotiations of the Russian Federation she would give guarantees to the United States that she would "return to the fulfillment of her contractual obligations." Harf said they made this proposal and are awaiting a response from Russia.



    The White House has no information about when and where such negotiations can take place.

    On July 29, the U.S. Presidential Administration accused Russia of violating the 1987 Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Short-Range Missiles (INF). Barack Obama sent a letter to Vladimir Putin, in which he informed that the United States accused Russia of violating this treaty.

    Washington had these suspicions back in 2011 and was brought to the attention of Russian officials in May 2013 by Under Secretary of State Rose Getemüller. The notice was sent to the US Embassy in Moscow. Secretary of State John Kerry informed the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov about him by telephone.

    In response, the Russian Foreign Ministry accused the United States of violating the same treaty. “These are missile launches of missile defense targets, and the production of armed drones, and the Mk-41, capable of launching medium-range cruise missiles,” the Russian department reminded

    What kind of claims the United States has, the White House does not say. According to RBC, they can be associated with pilot tests of the RS-26 Rubezh soil missile system, nicknamed by the Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin the “killer missile defense system”, and the R-500 operational-tactical cruise missile used on the Iskander- TO".

    The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the United States remains in the propaganda ticks of the Cold War. It is worth recalling that Russia has also long indicated a violation of the treaty by the United States. Before this, information appeared that the contract itself could be annulled.

    Russia has proposed discussing the strengthening of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles at the site of the North Atlantic Council, if this topic concerns NATO.

    An agreement on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles was signed in 1987 in Washington by Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan. The United States and the USSR pledged not to produce or test ground-based cruise and ballistic missiles of medium range (from 1000 to 5500 km) and short range (from 500 to 1000 km). The contract is not limited in time. By 1991, under a treaty of the USSR, it destroyed 1846 missile systems, the United States - 846.
  32. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 21 August 2014 14: 10
    0
    Quote: RUSOIVAN
    Nothing pleases us more than the failure of the "comrades"!


    The worst friends in the grave would look at them.
  33. saag
    saag 21 August 2014 14: 25
    0
    "New solid-state elements that are considered key to the target guidance system of future missiles."

    gyroscopes or what?
  34. bergberg
    bergberg 21 August 2014 14: 35
    0
    Do you think this is an American rocket? No, this is our rocket made with our money, and American dollars are just candy wrappers. As the great actor Papanov said from beware of the car, "You think this is your (dacha) rocket, no, it's my rocket - and you're just a beggar"!
  35. Siriusblack
    Siriusblack 21 August 2014 14: 40
    0
    Again, stories about the fact that the Americans do not have money ...
    1. bergberg
      bergberg 21 August 2014 14: 48
      0
      Who says they have no money? A lot, but not mine! America is a banker and the money of different countries has been invested in it, but many have already tried to return it to everyone. And the bank can be ruined, and a break can be printed on the copier. The townspeople!
  36. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 21 August 2014 14: 47
    0
    It seems like a rocket of the future, and the parameters are indecently modest. Why then reinvent the wheel?
    1. bergberg
      bergberg 21 August 2014 14: 50
      0
      It can be seen that our specialists of the runaway first wave died! And their dumb!
  37. Gecko
    Gecko 21 August 2014 14: 53
    0
    Let them throw off SMS am
  38. vodolaz
    vodolaz 21 August 2014 14: 57
    0
    It is difficult for Americans to fight against the whole world, and besides, they constantly lose.
  39. sub307
    sub307 21 August 2014 16: 13
    0
    I didn't understand what "solid-state guidance technologies" are. Is this one of the areas of solid-state microwave electronics, solid-state hybrid storage, or, not that, not another, but at all, something else?