Washington "finishes" Seoul

47
Washington "finishes" Seoul


The statement by the new South Korean defense minister, Han Min Gu, about the readiness to deploy elements of the American missile defense system in the country was perceived in Moscow, Beijing and, of course, in Pyongyang with undisguised surprise and alarm.

Of course, the implementation of this plan has traditionally been explained by the need to protect against North Korea, especially since Pyongyang in recent months has conducted several exercises with rocket firing, the progress of which was observed by the “young commander” Kym Chen Un. However, according to calculations by South Korean intelligence officers, North Korea’s getting used to missile launches has long been used to it: it was only in February-July of this year that the Juche idea launched more than 2500 rockets of eight modifications. But in June, the then Minister of Defense of the Republic of Korea, Kim Gwan Jin, assured his parliamentarians without a shadow of a doubt that, despite the pressure of overseas hegemons, Seoul did not plan to purchase and deploy land-based mobile anti-missile complexes for high-altitude interception of medium-range missiles . Moreover, just a couple of days before the high-profile statement by Han Min Gu, during the strategic consultations between the Chinese and South Korean military, an agreement was reached on expanding cooperation in the field of defense.

Smolensk Square promptly responded to an unexpected South Korean demarche.

In the comments of the Russian Foreign Ministry it was noted that "such a development will inevitably have a negative impact on the strategic situation in the region, could provoke an arms race in Northeast Asia, and create additional complications for solving the nuclear problem of the Korean Peninsula." Predictably harshly reacted in Beijing, although they tried to limit themselves to expressing their outrage only during bilateral meetings of diplomats.

The fact is that the South Koreans had previously tried to publicly distance themselves from the realization of the blue dream of the Pentagon - placing the missile defense system on the peninsula. Seoul persistently reiterated that he would limit himself to creating his own system against a possible rocket attack from the northern neighbor. Moreover, part of the missile shield was to be based on the Cholme air defense system developed by Russia, the Iron Mace, the experience of which allowed us to create a new C-350 complex. Another component is the South Korean destroyers with the Aegis system. Seoul has consistently adhered to this line over the past few years, despite the fact that adherents of a close alliance with Washington have firmly established themselves in power in South Korea since 2008.

The reappraisal of values ​​is connected with the arrival of the new head of the South Korean "Pentagon", who, with the directness of the regular military and voiced the new plans for Seoul. Obviously, it is not only and not so much the personal approach of Han Ming Gu himself. Given that, according to some reports, he took a course in the United States and in 2011, he was awarded the American Order For Military Merit. Yes, and the position is obliged to closely interact with American colleagues.

The thing is different. A trilateral meeting - the USA-Japan-South Korea-meeting in Honolulu should be considered as a starting point. To organize such a meeting is not an easy task.

The point is the unusual hostility, which still, despite all the efforts of Washington, exists between Tokyo and Seoul.

In long history I will not go in, it is enough just to say: after Tokyo recently announced that it was revising the country's basic law and allowing the armed forces to participate in military operations abroad, this antipathy intensified to the extreme.

The United States is vital to act as a kind of matchmaker for Tokyo and Seoul, there is no other way to put together a military alliance in Northeast Asia to counter Beijing. At the same time, Washington’s flirting with China in the economic and political spheres is not excluded, but the main role is assigned to the military containment of “Chinese expansion”.

On the other hand, for Seoul, dancing to the tune of the USA means serious complications in relations with Beijing. Recall: over the past few years, China has become the main economic partner of South Korea, the volume of trade last year amounted to about 250 billion dollars. The similar figures with the Americans at Seoul are almost two times lower. Due to the relative proximity of cultures, and even geographical proximity, the volume of tourist exchanges increases from year to year.

So to tear off Seoul from Beijing for the United States is a priority task.

There is nothing to do with economic methods here, as already mentioned, interaction with the Chinese is much more profitable for South Korea than partnership with the United States. Moreover, traditional exhortations on the theme “We are close allies, we were the ones who saved South Korea from defeat during the Korean War” have no chance of success. However, the White House has much more effective leverage, which he demonstrated. Otherwise, how can we explain the departure of Minister of Defense Kim Kwang Jin to another post. And this movement is fully consistent with the interests of Washington. Apparently, it was not for nothing that President Park Geun-hye, as the North Korean press sarcastically noted at the time, secretly visited the American embassy in Seoul more than once before the elections.

It is clear that the agreement of Seoul to deploy the American missile defense system causes a negative reaction in Beijing. After all, to contain the missile ambitions of the DPRK, South Korea’s already available means are quite enough. And the new complexes, which may appear in the South of the peninsula, are intended, first of all, to intercept ballistic missiles launched from the eastern regions of China and aimed specifically at the United States. The appearance of elements of the American missile defense system and North Korea in the south will not be happy at this. With numerous missile launches this year, they are trying to show their determination to "go to the end", regardless of the reaction of the world community.

Russia, with its well-known position on the US global missile defense system, is also not thrilled with the drastically changed position of South Korea. But today we are tied to Seoul in the implementation of trilateral projects in North Korea. Let us recall at least the recent opening ceremony of the pier in the port of Rajin, in which South Korean representatives participated.

It is important for us that in Seoul they would not succumb to the entreaties of the Americans to join the sanctions against our country. And the fact that such attempts are being made is not a secret to anyone.

Recently, a high-ranking representative of the US State Department visited South Korea, who was testing the position of his partners. While in Seoul do not show intention to follow the advice from Washington, but the pressure will only increase.

So while we confine ourselves to verbal suggestions. However, it is possible that as we move forward in implementing the plan to deploy the US missile defense system in South Korea or join the sanctions, Russia will be obliged to take a reciprocal step. It is possible that Moscow will coordinate its actions with Pyongyang to some extent or another.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    22 August 2014 14: 40
    It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.

    The use of these missiles completely eliminates the danger of the American missile defense on our borders ..... the counter is ticking .... the danger is growing.
    1. +2
      22 August 2014 14: 56
      Not the most adequate solution in this situation. Here is the launch of new submarines with ICBMs on board, this is effective. And, not unimportant, relatively not expensive .. At the same time, the entire advantage of missile defense at the borders of our country is leveled.
      1. +1
        22 August 2014 15: 14
        launch of new submarines with ICBMs on board


        The Americans are tracking our nuclear submarines and the likelihood that they will have time to complete their combat mission decreases in proportion to the ability to covertly move to a given area.
        1. +6
          22 August 2014 15: 35
          As Ukraine is torn from Russia, so is South Korea from its partners in the region. Standard tactics for sled mattresses.
        2. +2
          22 August 2014 15: 36
          Americans track our nuclear submarines

          They may be tracking this, but the missile defense system will not "drag on" three oceans. And missile defense is just effective at the launch stage. Besides, where are the guarantees that the ground Strategic Missile Forces are not under the hood?
        3. +1
          22 August 2014 15: 41
          Quote: The same Lech
          launch of new submarines with ICBMs on board


          The Americans are tracking our nuclear submarines and the likelihood that they will have time to complete their combat mission decreases in proportion to the ability to covertly move to a given area.


          The fact is that to solve combat missions, modern SSBNs do not even need to leave the territorial waters.
      2. +4
        22 August 2014 15: 39
        Quote: DVxa
        Not the most adequate solution in this situation. Here is the launch of new submarines with ICBMs on board, this is effective. And, not unimportant, relatively not expensive .. At the same time, the entire advantage of missile defense at the borders of our country is leveled.

        SSBN - is it not expensive? This is one of the MOST expensive projects! Missile defense elements can be suppressed by medium-range missiles, which are also found in sufficient numbers in the North. Korea, and in China. In addition, air and sea-based missile defense systems can be used for the same purposes - they are not subject to the RSMDN agreement.
        If Russia withdraws from this treaty, it is not because of missile defense elements in the Far East, but because, compared to the 80s when the treaty was concluded, we do not have 20 thousand tanks near Berlin, and the USA they can easily carry out the accumulation and deployment of forces in Europe, being accessible only by the strategic triad, and even the Tu-22M2.
      3. +3
        22 August 2014 16: 05
        And, importantly, relatively inexpensive

        At the expense of not expensive, you hurried, a 1-nuclear submarine with 16MBR will cost about 50 self-propelled launchers with medium-range missiles.
      4. +1
        22 August 2014 17: 50
        nothing has been invented more efficiently with our geography.
    2. +5
      22 August 2014 15: 03
      in fact, it’s not a contract. It is really necessary to invent and produce something new. The steps should not be predictable, then there is confidence to get out of the current situation in the role of the winning party.
    3. +2
      22 August 2014 15: 12
      If Seoul succumbs to the pressure of the mattresses, it will be necessary to place the Iskanders in the DPRK.
      1. +5
        22 August 2014 15: 25
        Quote: Thought Giant
        will have to place the Iskanders in the DPRK.

        Yes, maybe some kind of military. help has to be provided by the DPRK, given that its military budget is already 1 billion, and the military. the budget of South Korea is 26 billion, and who is aggressive here ..
        By the way, a good video about the DPRK:
    4. Jacques
      0
      22 August 2014 15: 25
      I absolutely agree, there is a feeling that such a move is being prepared.
    5. +3
      22 August 2014 15: 47
      Just cool)))))
    6. +2
      22 August 2014 16: 00
      Quote: The same Lech
      It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.

      The use of these missiles completely eliminates the danger of the American missile defense on our borders ..... the counter is ticking .... the danger is growing.


      The withdrawal from the ABM treaty is quite logical after the USA ceased to fulfill it.
      I think it would also be logical to withdraw from the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, which the United States so much wants to plan.
    7. mazhnikof.Niko
      +4
      22 August 2014 16: 37
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.


      Dear, why EXIT? What curtsies ?! In my opinion, Russia should declare from the "UN HIGH TRIBUNE" that the West has CORRECTED "International Law". Russia should initiate a "WIDE DISCUSSION" of NOT VALID "International law" and ... or the international community - STARTS in FULL SCOPE to adhere to the norms of "International law" Or Russia - denounces ALL international law - for itself! And there is no need to be afraid of the third world war, which has been going on for a long time, but according to the rules of the WEST. THOSE. in one (Russian) gate. After the "WEST" REALIZES THAT THE GAMES HAS ENDED, the West will remember about "INTERNATIONAL LAW" - instantly!
    8. 0
      22 August 2014 17: 50
      "Washington is finishing off Seoul." In principle, you can put it this way. Or it can be done differently - Washington is finishing itself off in Seoul. It will no longer be possible to divide Koreans as Russians and Ukrainians. Resources are running out, and other concepts are emerging. "A little more, a little more, the last fight is the most difficult one." Who would not like it, but New Russia is the hope of the World!
  2. 0
    22 August 2014 14: 43
    Quote: The same Lech
    It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.

    The use of these missiles completely eliminates the danger of the American missile defense on our borders ..... the counter is ticking .... the danger is growing.


    It was like this before, it was called an arms race, it didn’t lead to anything good, now it’s now actual to step on the same rake or what?
    1. +5
      22 August 2014 14: 48
      It's just that everything repeats, the same thing happens in history only every time a little differently.

      And "otherwise" this time it should be like this - the USA should overstrain in the race, screw up the economy and disintegrate !!!
    2. +7
      22 August 2014 14: 51
      It was before, called the arms race


      Quite right ... it was .... but the USSR did not burn out because of it .... if you look at the root of things because of the stupid policies of the CPSU MEMBERS of free help to everyone and everything (including our former republics).

      I believe that it is impossible to save on our NATIONAL SECURITY .... Gaddafi paid for this with his life and his country turned into a gangster outhouse .... we must go our own way and protect our interests without looking back at all.
      1. -9
        22 August 2014 14: 58
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        and defend their interests without looking back at all.

        Khrushchev probably thought so too, just before a nuclear war with his "recklessness" did not bring
        1. +9
          22 August 2014 15: 04
          Khrushchev probably thought so too, just before a nuclear war with his "recklessness" did not bring


          Well, you don’t have to come up with .... THE CARIBBEAN CRISIS is entirely the fault of the USA ...
          For all his eccentricity, Khrushchev was not a fool and understood what the games with nuclear weapons could lead to.
          But the USA in the current situation does not understand at all what its aggressive policy towards Russia can lead to.
        2. +9
          22 August 2014 15: 42
          The Cuban missile crisis occurred due to the deployment of the Thor and Jupiter rockets by John F. Kennedy in England, Italy and Turkey
        3. +3
          22 August 2014 15: 52
          Quote: saag
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          and defend their interests without looking back at all.

          Khrushchev probably thought so too, just before a nuclear war with his "recklessness" did not bring


          At that time, the strategic nuclear potential of the Soviet Union was estimated as 30-40% of the US potential. The Americans calculated that after the exchange of nuclear strikes, the nuclear and military potential of the USSR would exceed the US potential by 15-20%, while the USSR was losing 35-50% of the population and economy, and the USA - 50-70%. it was concluded that this was tantamount to defeat. Result - The Caribbean crisis has been resolved. At the same time, no one claimed, from the competent military, that Kennedy had done the wrong thing. True, some proposed the use of tactical nuclear weapons against Cuba. A probe through Soviet military attachés showed that the USSR, yielding to the United States at the time of the strategic nuclear weapons, was nevertheless determined to use it in case of conflict, not limiting the conflict only to the territory of Cuba.
          Kennedy had the opportunity to check who had the eggs stronger, but he decided not to risk it.
        4. 11111mail.ru
          +1
          22 August 2014 17: 36
          Quote: saag
          Khrushchev probably thought so too, just before a nuclear war with his "recklessness" did not bring

          This "woodpecker" who "ate" LP Beria should not be accused of "obscurity".
          Something to me your term "imperceptibility" reminded me of a line from a song about Hetman Sagaidachny: "Changing the wines of a zhinka to a tyutyun and a cradle, not ordinary" ...
      2. 0
        22 August 2014 15: 05
        Before everyone was fed around how much the wolf didn’t feed into the forest, it was necessary to think about yourself first, think about the United and then feed the rest for free Africa agriculture completely died there for itself and they did a disservice to them
    3. +1
      22 August 2014 14: 57
      You are deeply mistaken, very deep.
    4. +5
      22 August 2014 15: 03
      saag
      It was like this before, it was called an arms race, it didn’t lead to anything good, now it’s now actual to step on the same rake or what?

      And what do you think we don’t need to respond to US steps. How many Yankees adhere to contracts? At least after the collapse of the USSR, they came out without asking Russia to deter missile defense, but the advancement of NATO and US bases to the borders of the Russian Federation, etc. And always finding any simply bloated reason and not only against us, you don’t need to follow examples, they are all the modern history of the USA. Keep silent, they will be even more impudent.
    5. +2
      22 August 2014 15: 48
      Off topic is just funny))) Clickable
    6. 11111mail.ru
      +1
      22 August 2014 17: 26
      Quote: saag
      previously called an arms race, it didn’t lead to anything good

      That's right! Smart people say: waiting and catching up is the worst thing. Therefore = to work proactively, and not to look into the mouth of the "partner".
    7. 0
      22 August 2014 17: 54
      "It's time, it's time," said Kasim, tying the camels. So what? Exit and not observe the same way - two big differences.
  3. AIR
    AIR
    +1
    22 August 2014 14: 45
    Time will tell ... Let's hope that China will restore order in Asia and take all the "local" under its wing (read control) ...
    1. +5
      22 August 2014 16: 28
      AIRO, in my opinion, we will get the same as in Europe-EU (Berlin-Paris-London), only in Asia there will be Beijing-Delhi-Seoul. I think we should be actively engaged in building various "institutions" in Asia, in the humanitarian sphere, security, etc. Otherwise, we will again remain in such a position that it will be necessary (as in Europe) to confront everyone in Asia.
      The role of Russia in Asia is now unique - it has so much experience in international affairs that all other Asian countries taken together are not near.
      With regard to Seoul, I think it will be so. The Kremlin has already made it clear that it is not desirable to deploy missile defense systems in Korea. Further. Who is not profitable? Of course, China, because a retaliatory nuclear strike will not be possible - the missile flight (trajectory) goes exactly through Korea. Consequently, having held the Beijing-Moscow talks, and having calculated everything, it is possible to sober up Seoul with joint economic sanctions (in no case military pressure). By the way, such an alignment is not very good in Delhi either (from the size of the missile defense system in Korea). Of course, you can do what the US did in the Cuban Missile Crisis. To surround this "island" with joint fleets and strangle transport and sea ties with Korea. But then, than we are the world's gendarmes, we will alienate other small countries of Asia.
      Agree that it is better by diplomatic and economic means. Under the motto - "no militarization of the region" - you can raise the whole of Asia against the plans of Seoul and the United States. Russia, India, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, CA countries, Iran, etc. We are here, consolidating the whole of Asia, and we will gain more political dividends; than threatening with weapons. Everyone will understand that the Russian Federation is soberly approaching the world. problems and that they do not want to fight with anyone. Moreover, to play the role of the world gendarme. This will attract others to us. Still, we need to make everyone understand that the EAEU (led by the Russian Federation) is a world energy power and we can solve problems without weapons. Then our Union will grow and attract. hi
  4. +5
    22 August 2014 14: 46
    It is necessary to come out of all agreements; they do not agree with them as with Ukrainians (they never fulfill promises)
    1. +10
      22 August 2014 14: 52
      Oh, yelling, yelling)))
  5. +2
    22 August 2014 14: 47
    Korea pisses north inadequate, and the Americans use it.
    1. +4
      22 August 2014 14: 50
      Oh uses)))
  6. +6
    22 August 2014 14: 47
    Here are the creatures. We have been stuck around from all sides. It’s time to place medium-range missiles in Cuba. For good, the Americans still do not understand.
    1. +2
      22 August 2014 14: 57
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Here are the creatures. We have been stuck around from all sides. It’s time to place medium-range missiles in Cuba. For good, the Americans still do not understand.

      I think the answer to this will be more subtle and more sophisticated than their stupid idea and clumsy work with the deployment of missile defense!
      PS China is a very large lender and player in the stock markets of the United States. as well as a holder of dollar husk. and revenge of the Chinese will primarily be directed to the economic plane! And for the Junkers, it's like a kick below the waist!
      1. +1
        22 August 2014 15: 03
        The fact of the matter is that America, and so in deep opera, they can repay debts only with their worthless pieces of paper! The history of German gold has clearly shown it! And it is simply unprofitable for China to destroy the American economy. The main export of Chinese goods is precisely the US market.
  7. +2
    22 August 2014 14: 48
    North Korea is not at all happy about the appearance of elements of the American missile defense system in the south, which this year is trying to show its determination to "go to the end" with numerous missile launches, despite the reaction of the world community.


    As we see, nothing good will come of the mattress idea !! With their filthy missile defense they will only increase tension in this region and increase the camp of their opponents! The policy of this country itself drives itself into the grave, and at a Stakhanov pace !! Let's not bother them !!
  8. +3
    22 August 2014 14: 48
    Are they not afraid that China will help North Korea with modern weapons?

    It feels like world capital has begun a war with the world's population. After all, all decisions of Western politicians are to the detriment of their people.
  9. +1
    22 August 2014 14: 49
    It is high time, for suggestions at the level of words do not work. Yes, it’s difficult to talk with the east with words; the east will not show the true face, otherwise it will lose it. And they learned to graduate.
  10. +6
    22 August 2014 14: 52
    Quit the contract and put on all the holders about medium-range missiles so that they know if they are the first to burn out. Then the Poles and all who placed will tear them out at the request of the people.
  11. +2
    22 August 2014 14: 56
    Well, why are we such fools, life teaches us, teaches us everything, why we must be kind, white and fluffy for everyone, is it really impossible to warn this very Korea so as not to flirt, to remember what distance the United States is and who it lives near , to warn that would not be looking for adventure.
  12. 0
    22 August 2014 14: 56
    Someone actively sculpts minuses ... whether the Cossack didn’t appear on the site)?
  13. well-wisher
    +3
    22 August 2014 14: 58
    The only answer for Russia is military bases in Cuba. That's when America will think about it.
  14. -6
    22 August 2014 15: 02
    Quote: Magic Archer
    Here are the creatures. We have been stuck around from all sides. It’s time to place medium-range missiles in Cuba. For good, the Americans still do not understand.



    Quote: Russian Alexey
    Withdraw from the contract and point out to all holders about medium-range missiles, so that they know if they are the first to burn out.



    Quote: well-wisher
    The only answer for Russia is military bases in Cuba. That's when America will think


    It is contagious, where are you from such "Ivans who do not remember kinship", that is to say, you take stories, in childhood you have not played enough in war?
    1. +3
      22 August 2014 15: 20
      And you are probably a local peacekeeper!? I just know the story well and I am fine with the memory! Therefore, before you write something, consider the meaning of your words!
      1. +4
        22 August 2014 16: 02
        Apparently, the comrade does not realize that Russia is now CIRCULATED by the ring of US bases, which has ANY harvest; apparently does not know what the US fleet is, and what weapons it carries; apparently does not know the number of strategic bombers in the United States and how much can be re-opened for a month or two; he doesn’t know about the number of ground-based strategic missiles, and also that when reduced, unlike the USSR and Russia, these missiles were not completely destroyed, and only the first stage — the rest — at storage bases and which can be easily made and destroyed, was destroyed in them. install again.
        The very existence of Russia is possible only thanks to the strategic nuclear potential.
    2. 11111mail.ru
      +1
      22 August 2014 17: 45
      Quote: saag
      It's contagious, where are you from such "Ivans who do not remember kinship",

      What kind of prosecutor showed up?
      Quote: saag
      that is, stories take,

      Yes, even illiteratein addition to his arrogance.
      Quote: saag
      in childhood in war games whether that did not play enough?

      He cannot even formulate a claim competently.
  15. +1
    22 August 2014 15: 02
    The "wise monkeys" cannot sit on a branch while two tigers are fighting. One tiger climbed a tree out of fear, and another tiger is puzzled by this behavior. They will tear one of the monkeys to shreds. wink
  16. 0
    22 August 2014 15: 07
    Yes, it is strange, the South Koreans have recently behaved quite decently and deliberately. Why they spoil relations with China is completely incomprehensible.
  17. +2
    22 August 2014 15: 07
    Quote: The same Lech
    It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.

    The use of these missiles completely eliminates the danger of the American missile defense on our borders ..... the counter is ticking .... the danger is growing.

    surround us sad we must denounce all the agreements that bind our military hands .. UNCLE BOBA said that as necessary we will do so .. wait .. what
  18. +1
    22 August 2014 15: 27
    Well, really. Here are the patriots a hundred kilometers from our region, in Poland. Two years as set.
    I don’t like this nifiga! am

    Well, we brought in Iskandars in response. I like it affably. laughing

    That's just provocateur number 1 is always the states! What do they achieve? We would sit quietly.

    But they are not that nation, their state was born of TERROR !, so why be surprised?
    1. +1
      22 August 2014 16: 22
      Patriots trash. Will not help. Dust in the eyes, as usual, like we are the saviors of Europe. From whom, current, it is not clear.
  19. +2
    22 August 2014 15: 34
    We will withdraw from the treaty and that these bitches in Europe, Japan, Turkey and Turkey will poke them, consider the humanitarian column to be aggression, this is of course from the realm of fantasy, but I would say that we will take the deployment of missile defense at our borders as an act of aggression and warned how you destroy it in the moment of deployment, do not scold, I understand that it’s nonsense, but the bitches are sick of it when these bastards leave us in vain.
  20. 0
    22 August 2014 15: 34
    "Vostok 2014" and everyone will start asking for diapers, and remembering the surrender of 1945 ... hi
  21. +1
    22 August 2014 15: 38
    and we must probably return to the cube
  22. 0
    22 August 2014 15: 53
    Only with the collapse of the United States in this world will something change for the better. Some ancient fortuneteller predicted that after Obama, the United States has no future as a state. We wait and see maybe it will come true for the benefit of the whole world.
  23. miraculous
    +1
    22 August 2014 15: 56
    Yes gentlemen, a new cold war has begun (tin
  24. 0
    22 August 2014 15: 57
    Do the Yankees really want to force Russia to place the corresponding systems in Latin and South America!
  25. 0
    22 August 2014 16: 06
    With all the love, as it were, the Latins will not follow this example of Cuba before everyone's eyes.
  26. MSA
    MSA
    0
    22 August 2014 16: 13
    Quote: The same Lech
    It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.

    The use of these missiles completely eliminates the danger of the American missile defense on our borders ..... the counter is ticking .... the danger is growing.


    The withdrawal from the ABM treaty is quite logical after the USA ceased to fulfill it.
    I think it would also be logical to withdraw from the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, which the United States so much wants to plan.

    In my opinion, it’s time to slow down all agreements with mattresses.
    1. +1
      22 August 2014 17: 00
      I agree!....

      Such interesting ones, when they broke off, all military cooperation with us, in the spring, left a subparagraph - BUT please leave us a corridor for the troops to leave Afghanistan. And so you poop and byak.

      Now we are filled up with sanctions, they are screaming loudly that Putin is an aggressor, we are poop and whack -NO please sell us helicopters. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of approach is this at all ??????

      Go .................... th
  27. +2
    22 August 2014 17: 09
    I thought to buy huyndai, and now I’m thinking, I can take a Chinese of the same configuration, but cheaper.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      0
      22 August 2014 17: 48
      Quote: ALEXX.
      can take a Chinese of the same configuration, but cheaper.

      When you decide = unsubscribe, such thoughts appear more often.
  28. Mih
    0
    22 August 2014 22: 38
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    It is time RUSSIA to withdraw from the agreement on missile defense medium and short range.
    good
    Tokyo recently announced the revision of the country's fundamental law and the permission of the armed forces to participate in military operations abroad. request
    USA act as a kind of matchmaker for Tokyo and Seoul
    Seoul persistently repeated that it would confine itself to creating its own system against a possible missile attack from the northern neighbor. Moreover, part of the missile shield should have been based on the Cholme - Iron Mace air defense systems developed with the participation of Russia.
    For Seoul, on the other hand, dancing to the tune of the United States means serious complications in relations with Beijing
    It is understood that Seoul’s agreement to deploy an American missile defense provokes a negative reaction from Beijing.
    The deployment of the American missile defense system in South Korea or its accession to the sanctions, Russia will be obliged to take a retaliatory step. soldier
  29. Mih
    0
    22 August 2014 22: 48
    I thought to buy huyndai, and now I’m thinking, I can take a Chinese of the same configuration, but cheaper.

    Take the Chinese? Hm. It is very interesting, but ruinous and destructive for the environment. love
  30. 0
    23 August 2014 07: 04
    One pity - Russia suffers everything. Judging because the world is going on - the Americans have long scored on any agreements, they only require the execution of these agreements from others, and for them they are unwritten (more precisely, they do not care for these agreements)
  31. 0
    24 August 2014 23: 39
    Quote: The same Lech
    Khrushchev probably thought so too, just before a nuclear war with his "recklessness" did not bring


    Well, you don’t have to come up with .... THE CARIBBEAN CRISIS is entirely the fault of the USA ...
    For all his eccentricity, Khrushchev was not a fool and understood what the games with nuclear weapons could lead to.
    But the USA in the current situation does not understand at all what its aggressive policy towards Russia can lead to.

    Understand!
    Bluffing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"