Elite Forces of Coup

118
Elite Forces of Coup


Who will the West put on, not abandoning plans to repeat the Ukrainian scenario in Russia?

In the next two to four years, the West will try to organize a coup d'etat in Russia, by analogy with the Ukrainian Maidan, to remove Vladimir Putin, says writer and economist Nikolai Starikov.

The most problematic, in his opinion, may be the 2016 and 2018 years, for which parliamentary and presidential elections are scheduled.

“These will be the points when they try to carry out coups. The fact that they, speaking in pirate language, discharged Vladimir Putin with a “black mark” is obvious. That is, they believe, and rightly believe, what exactly our president is hindering the implementation of their plans. Therefore, they are looking for the forces that will be ready to carry out a palace or some Maidan coup in Russia, ”Starikova quoted the Navigator news agency as saying.

And this force, he suggests, may well be the so-called political and economic elite of the country, which the West is now aggressively trying to split.
Therefore, such "original" sanctions are sure the economist. Against state-owned companies and banks they are introduced. Against private business, no.

“Not a single bank, not a single oligarch, not a single oligarchic company was sanctioned. This is a direct message: if you are close to the president, if you enter his inner circle, then we will beat you. Therefore, if you want your business to flourish, then distance yourself from it or even become our tool in the palace coup that we need, ”Starikov said.

He also draws attention to the fact that Western sanctions have by no means affected all members of the government of Medvedev: “Minister Rogozin — sanctions have been imposed on him. Minister Shoigu - against him sanctions imposed. And the Minister of Finance Siluanov, who pays for everything that Shoigu and Rogozin does, does not have sanctions against him. And why? ”- asks Starikov.

And he himself replies: "Because he is a liberal." And "if you are a liberal and are far from the president, then you will not be included in the sanctions list," the writer believes.

How much is the scenario written by Starikov for Russia?

- if you think historical by analogies, we can recall that one similar event happened in our country not so long ago - in 1991, - says State Duma deputy, director of the Center for Research on Political Culture of Russia Sergey Vasiltsov. - The coup seemed then something incredible, although all kinds of signals and signaling devices were. And it was obvious: something was being prepared.

Can we expect something similar in the future? I definitely stand on the position that in our era, in the era (it is not entirely clear where, but, nevertheless, transitional, very stormy, very so foggy), in general, everything is possible.

All this is embedded in the logic of what is happening today.

- Explain ...

- We have ended the post-Soviet period. The period when they pushed away from the Soviet coast, but to the bourgeois, capitalist coast, to which they rowed so hard, in my opinion, they did not finish.

The transitional period dragged on, and it is absolutely clear that the model that was set in the form of a goal — entry into Western civilization, the creation of bourgeois society in the Western style, and so on — did not take place.

Nobody waited for us in the West. Nobody needs us there. And if they are needed, then in the form of pasture, which is pinched, feeding on it, and at the same time trampling when the flock goes on the grass ...

This does not bode well for us. It’s good that Putin understood this and began to turn the ship a little bit the other way. But such a sharp transition from one to another is always very painful.

Today we have a lot of incompatible. That is, the patriotic statist politics (and we already see its real features, even the fruits, in the form of Crimea) are combined with a liberal financial and economic balance. But these are two incompatible things.

- The very "weak spot", where really drive a wedge?

- I think in the West this is also very well understood. There are many good analysts there. They are an experienced people. And in this demarcation line, so to speak, and, perhaps, in the rift, they will most likely try to drive wedges.

Moreover, the wedges have where to drive. Even at the level of government one can see, let's say, two groups of actors. Some support the current line of the president. Others are firmly in liberal positions.

Of course, this cannot last long. Need a new personnel policy. A new team of people is needed who would not only formally work out these or other instructions, as if implementing them. And roll up their sleeves, worked.

The director of international programs at the Institute of National Strategy of Russia, Yuri Solozobov, in turn, recalled the theory that it is considered that the 1917-th year in Russia will repeat in exactly one hundred years.

- About this theory started talking even in the time of Yeltsin. This 17 year, as a mystical date, like 14 year - the century of the beginning of the First World War, always hovers in the minds, like some self-fulfilling prophecy.

Later in the expert circles appeared the theory of the "sixteenth year". She was born, oddly enough, in the Center for Scientific and Political Thought, close to Vladimir Yakunin. A detailed report was prepared there, which predicted social risks and social tensions in the country. It indicated that a possible increase in social activity, comparable to that in 91-93, would occur just in 2016. It was also noted that at this moment “interception of power” is possible.

- What does it mean?

- That is what is behind this, completely incomprehensible. But it is very significant that the United States offered the post of new ambassador to Russia, John Tefft, who is well known for his specific skills in organizing all sorts of "color revolutions". He has already managed to exercise in this matter, including in Georgia.

While the first stage is underway, it must be assumed preparatory. It takes about a year or two, judging by the scenarios that unfolded in other countries.

But the thing is that if you read the theorists of the “color revolutions” and coups, it is, after all, not a 100% given. Much, if not all, depends on how solid is solidarity between the country's population and the national leader, the leadership.

And Putin’s rating is now unusually high. And this is not only “vtsiomovskie” estimates - for 82%. These are assessments of independent sociological structures, Russian and foreign.
So in these conditions it will be quite difficult to rock the boat.

As for the bet on the internal split of the elite, we know that under certain conditions the sense of self-preservation of the leaders is triggered, and personnel cleansing is done quite toughly, despite friendly ties and acquaintances.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

118 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +58
    21 August 2014 21: 53
    Something I have no doubt that in our country they will be able to properly and timely clean up the political clearing for the elections. How many times have this procedure been observed ...

    Everything will be fine :)
    1. +19
      21 August 2014 21: 57
      Let's hope that everything will be fine!
    2. sergey261180
      +3
      21 August 2014 22: 08
      Quote: comm
      Something I have no doubt that in our country they will be able to properly and timely clean up the political clearing for the elections. How many times have this procedure been observed ...

      Why elections then?
      1. +14
        21 August 2014 22: 15
        Quote: sergey261180
        Why elections then?

        Right. Therefore, in the United States, presidential elections do not trust the population. It is chosen by trusted electors.
        1. -43
          21 August 2014 22: 35
          Quote: Nick
          Right. Therefore, in the United States, presidential elections do not trust the population. It is chosen by trusted electors.

          And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.
          1. -34
            21 August 2014 23: 23
            And rightly so, democracy belongs to the elite, and not to any quilted jackets and other demos.
            1. -33
              21 August 2014 23: 56
              The numerical ratio of the elite to quilted jackets, as shepherds to herds. So democracy is the work of shepherds. The herd is not necessary.
              1. -27
                22 August 2014 00: 07
                Exactly, B. cattle should work, well, the organs for the elite or there, the toys are sexual, and the elections are worthy.
                1. +2
                  22 August 2014 06: 28
                  did you say that in all seriousness?
                  1. +2
                    22 August 2014 08: 09
                    I think it was sarcasm
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. 0
                  22 August 2014 13: 14
                  I honestly can hardly imagine that after all that has happened in Russia over the past 30 years, the crowd would have jumped with a cry like "who does not jump that mo..skal." Although if you look at what happened on Bolotnaya Square, there are doubts, but there is hope that the history of Ukraine has got these people right.
                  1. +1
                    22 August 2014 23: 24
                    Quote: user
                    Although if you look at what was happening on Bolotnaya Square, there are doubts, but there is hope that the history of Ukraine has corrected these people’s brains.

                    Exactly. The beauty of the current situation is that the liberal elite, thanks to their US idol, is currently at a loss. Everything that they, for 23 years after the collapse of the USSR, tried to pass off as candy, turned out to be crap overnight. The gilding has come off the idol! It began with Cyprus, when the United States robbed the elite to the bone and, as a rescue, slipped its empty papers for real 10 tons of Cypriot gold !!! As debt repayment))) Here the liberal elite began to suspect that the West did not guarantee the preservation of their capital, because which does not guarantee. After the Ukrainian crisis - the seizure of Yanyk's accounts, sanctions on "authoritative" ones, etc. etc. they felt with their own skin that they could lose everything, and driving a wave against the conductor of Russia's independent policy, that is, GDP, in such conditions is to oppose 82% of the population, which is like suicide, since the example of Ukraine is before their eyes, only our option, for them maybe even lethal - they will chop them up with shovels and nationalize all their assets. This has already happened, and therefore, for them now the most suitable option is to draw in their "hard-earned money" because of the cordon and invest them in Russian investment projects in order to sleep peacefully until the contradictions with the West stabilize. Gone are the days when the SS people could be cheated on sausage and gum in colorful packaging. Everyone understood everything ... I myself will go out against the swamp ones with a picket fence, drive them along the gullies until they run out of steam
              2. +7
                22 August 2014 01: 05
                Quote: tolian
                The numerical ratio of the elite to quilted jackets, as shepherds to herds. So democracy is the work of shepherds. The herd is not necessary.

                This, in general, is called kleptocracy (the rule of the rich, the so-called "elite"), not democracy.
                1. +2
                  22 August 2014 04: 21
                  Well, why isn't corporal punishment used in our school? After all, when the same and through the "back gate stood up". I do not mean that the power of the rich in ancient Greek will be plutocracy, and kleptocracy from the same Greek can be translated as the power of thieves, but to the fact that nowadays some "undelivered" education with too excessive aplomb are beginning to bear instructive nonsense. And with the use of bodily - already hammered reflexes would certainly have warned against broadcasting such nonsense.
                2. +1
                  22 August 2014 08: 29
                  We must be more precise in the wording, because our "quick-rich" without exception are all thieves, because none of them earned and inherited their fortunes, and the thief should be in prison and no matter whose friend he is. Although their friendship is just a BENEFIT! It will not be profitable to find new friends, so that gentlemen are thieves on cameras and as quickly as possible, so as not to "muddle" some dirty trick against Russia!
              3. 0
                22 August 2014 07: 34
                Quote: tolian
                So democracy

                What gap did you get out of, "philosophers" ........!?
            2. +3
              22 August 2014 01: 00
              Quote: s.cot
              And rightly so, democracy belongs to the elite, and not to any quilted jackets and other demos.

              Are you serious or are you joking?
              1. +5
                22 August 2014 01: 15
                I’m seriously joking. Do I look like Rockefeller or Deripaska? Welded at a construction site I earn money.
            3. mad
              +3
              22 August 2014 01: 12
              Quote: s.cot
              ... to all quilted jackets and other demos.

              Dear, change the training manual from "for Ukraine" to "for Russia", otherwise today's vyser will not pay you.
              1. +5
                22 August 2014 01: 18
                what ... recourse ... look above.
            4. -1
              22 August 2014 01: 27
              Quote: s.cot
              And rightly so, democracy belongs to the elite, and not to any quilted jackets and other demos.

              "Demos" is the elite. In ancient Greece, only free citizens with civil rights were considered "Damos".
              1. -2
                22 August 2014 01: 33
                In this case, explain to people the difference between the elite, the demos and the citizens. And do not forget to mention who these slaves are.
                1. 0
                  22 August 2014 01: 42
                  Quote: s.cot
                  In this case, explain to people the difference between the elite, the demos and the citizens. And do not forget to mention who these slaves are.

                  An explanation of such things is inappropriate.
                  I just pointed out that the concepts of "demos" and "population" are different in the realities of ancient Greece. Therefore, it is wrong to use the word "demos" in a disparaging manner, such as "and other demos."
                  1. +5
                    22 August 2014 02: 18
                    In this case, regardless of ancient Greece, shall we speak in modern terms? For example, that the current "elite" are just thieves?
              2. +1
                22 August 2014 01: 35
                Quote: Tor Hummer

                "Demos" is the elite. In ancient Greece, only free citizens with civil rights were considered "Damos".


                I’ll supplement with your permission free citizens who own property, including slaves.
              3. 0
                22 August 2014 07: 31
                Quote: Tor Hummer
                free citizens with civil rights.

                and had slaves, the power of slave owners, to be exact
            5. +2
              22 August 2014 05: 09
              And what zaminusili s.cot'and? s.cot it is jitters. Has the people really ceased to understand banter and sarcasm?
            6. +1
              22 August 2014 07: 07
              And rightly so, democracy belongs to the elite, and not to any quilted jackets and other demos. You question what kind of elite? Chubaisyatovskaya fattened on the deceit of a great country? Everyone is SURE to DROP the criminal past and you say the elite. ELITE was shot in 1917-1937-1953.
            7. +1
              22 August 2014 07: 17
              "Not a single bank, not a single oligarch, not a single oligarchic company got under sanction the question of why the Russian coat of arms on the Russian rubles should NOT be the coat of arms of RUSSIA and not some plucked chicken. It turns out that not our RUSSIAN go to RUSSIA but it’s not known what.
            8. 0
              22 August 2014 20: 01
              Quote: s.cot
              And rightly so, democracy belongs to the elite, and not to any quilted jackets and other demos.


              Democracy literally translates as the power of the people.
              It cannot belong only to a part of the people. This is nonsense.
              Quote: Tor Hummer
              And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.

              All who hit is Ochlocracy. In a democratic society, there are restrictions, age qualifications, legal capacity, concluded by court order, etc. as in Russia for example.
              Quote: tolian
              The numerical ratio of the elite to quilted jackets, as shepherds to herds. So democracy is the work of shepherds.

              This is not democracy, but the oligarchy - the power of the few. An example is the USA, with some conventionality of course. The oligarchy has nothing to do with democracy.
              Dear, ay-ay-ay. We talk about what we have no idea. Not good... negative
          2. +2
            21 August 2014 23: 53
            And what about the deaf and dumb?
            1. +4
              22 August 2014 00: 03
              Blind and all things.
          3. +2
            22 August 2014 00: 12
            Quote: Tor Hummer
            Quote: Nick
            Right. Therefore, in the United States, presidential elections do not trust the population. It is chosen by trusted electors.

            And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.


            You explain what you mean.
            1. -8
              22 August 2014 01: 30
              Quote: DV69
              You explain what you mean.

              I mean that the votes of a university professor and an unemployed alcoholic should not be equal.
              More precisely, alcoholics and other asocial elements should be denied the right to vote, while professors should have it.
              1. +9
                22 August 2014 02: 29
                Well, if you think that the life of "Professor" Meow is more valuable than the life of a child who did not get money for cancer treatment, because. this money went to the salary of "professor" Chubais, there is nothing to talk to you about.
              2. +1
                22 August 2014 03: 23
                Quote: Tor Hummer
                Quote: DV69
                You explain what you mean.

                I mean that the votes of a university professor and an unemployed alcoholic should not be equal.
                More precisely, alcoholics and other asocial elements should be denied the right to vote, while professors should have it.

                And in what category do you (with a small letter) consider yourself a loved one? Really to alcoholics?
                1. 0
                  22 August 2014 16: 09
                  Quote: papik09
                  And in what category do you (with a small letter) consider yourself a loved one? Really to alcoholics?

                  No, I don’t categorically drink. Not a drop, even on major holidays. But the fact that you (with a small letter) and those like you have reacted like this suggests that you have touched the living.
                  Here I look at an avatar - a person who seems to be of age, and the style of speech and questions from the category of "himself d.u.a.k."
              3. +5
                22 August 2014 05: 05
                Quote: Tor Hummer

                I mean that the votes of a university professor and an unemployed alcoholic should not be equal.
                More precisely, alcoholics and other asocial elements should be denied the right to vote, while professors should have it.


                And who told you that yesterday’s professor is not an alcoholic today? Or do we have no alcoholics professors? feel
                1. +1
                  22 August 2014 05: 09
                  PS And on the example of Ukraine it is seen with the naked eye that some professors have long been waiting for ordinary ordinary orderlies Yes
              4. AUL
                +1
                22 August 2014 07: 52
                But to decide who should be given the right to vote, and who will not, who will? The professors themselves? Or bankers? Or millionaires? Or members of EP?
                1. 0
                  22 August 2014 16: 18
                  Quote from AUL
                  But to decide who should be given the right to vote, and who will not, who will? The professors themselves? Or bankers? Or millionaires? Or members of EP?

                  And this should be decided by civil society. In general, society should regulate the state. But unfortunately in Russia there is no civil society. The people did not realize the importance of influencing the processes occurring in the state, and the state, meanwhile, understands this and uses it to its maximum advantage, while trying to slow down the formation of civil society for as long as possible.
                  1. 0
                    22 August 2014 16: 37
                    And civil society should be in the state. Because it is precisely the ability of society to self-regulation that provides a reliable basis for any statehood.
                    Citizens should clearly understand what they want from the state and who is able to realize these goals.
                    Corresponding political parties should appear according to the aspirations of society, those that already exist should adapt to public opinion and adjust their programs in accordance with it.
                    New parties must oust old and obsolete political parties that have failed to adapt to modern realities, in the process of fair and open elections. If such a mechanism is not implemented in the state, then the state is deprived of the mechanism of self-renewal and the inflow of fresh blood into power, and such a state begins to decay, and the mechanism of "negative selection" is activated in the system of state power. - This is exactly what has been happening with us for many decades.
                    And then people like you are surprised at how people come from in power like Chubais or Serdyukov or Gorbachev or the deputies of EP and the like. So you should know that these people are not random, but they are a regularity - a direct consequence of the political course chosen by the country's leadership.
          4. +3
            22 August 2014 01: 00
            Quote: Tor Hummer
            Quote: Nick
            Right. Therefore, in the United States, presidential elections do not trust the population. It is chosen by trusted electors.

            And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.

            They write here all that is horrible ... am
            1. -6
              22 August 2014 01: 08
              Quote: PENZYAC
              Quote: Tor Hummer
              Quote: Nick
              Right. Therefore, in the United States, presidential elections do not trust the population. It is chosen by trusted electors.

              And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.

              They write here all that is horrible ... am


              I can’t say what Nick meant, but in my opinion the right to elect and be elected really needs to be earned. For example, why should a drug addict have equal rights with a military officer?
              They should be right after duties.
              1. 0
                22 August 2014 01: 33
                Quote: DV69
                I can’t say what Nick meant, but in my opinion the right to elect and be elected really needs to be earned. For example, why should a drug addict have equal rights with a military officer?
                They should be right after duties.

                You can still bring this analogy - in order to drive a car, you need to learn this and get the right to drive.
                Elections are also governance, but driving is not a car, but an entire state. So, why, in order to manage the state, you do not need to get rights?
                1. 0
                  22 August 2014 01: 36
                  Quote: Tor Hummer

                  You can still bring this analogy - in order to drive a car you need to learn this and get rights.
                  Elections are also governance, but driving is not a car, but an entire state. So, why in order to manage the state does not need to learn?


                  Entirely and completely agree.
                2. +3
                  22 August 2014 01: 38
                  How competent and correct are you to recall Chubais and Gaidar?
              2. 0
                22 August 2014 03: 26
                Quote: DV69
                They should be right after duties.

                I dare to disagree with you. Not "after", but AT THE SAME TIME. Only then will it make any sense drinks
              3. +3
                22 August 2014 06: 02
                Quote: DV69
                the right to elect and be elected really needs to be earned. For example, why should a drug addict have equal rights with a military officer?

                So-and-so, but not far from Nazism here! The right to vote is given with Russian citizenship. A drug addict has equal rights on the basis of his citizenship, but a guest worker does not. If he is already a citizen, then no matter what his social status is, he can vote or not go to the polls. But the standard of living of a person who gave the best years to his homeland, the standard of living must be higher!
                1. 0
                  22 August 2014 06: 12
                  Quote: Mole
                  So-and-so, but not far from Nazism here! The right to vote is given with Russian citizenship. A drug addict has equal rights on the basis of his citizenship, but a guest worker does not. If he is already a citizen, then no matter what his social status is, he can vote or not go to the polls. But the standard of living of a person who gave the best years to his homeland, the standard of living must be higher!

                  And then, drug addicts and migrant workers who have bought citizenship, "choose" so that it will not seem a little.
            2. +1
              22 August 2014 03: 24
              Quote: PENZYAC
              They write here all that is horrible ...

              .... and then the swimming trunks disappear laughing drinks
          5. +3
            22 August 2014 03: 20
            Quote: Tor Hummer
            Quote: Nick
            Right. Therefore, in the United States, presidential elections do not trust the population. It is chosen by trusted electors.

            And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.

            You can not be likened to these shit-racers - THE RIGHT TO VOTE IS CONFIRMED BY CITIZENSHIP AND PERFORMANCE !!!
            Learn the materiel, they say that helps ...
          6. +3
            22 August 2014 05: 40
            R.Hayline "Starship Troopers"?)
            1. 0
              22 August 2014 14: 26
              R.Hayline "Starship Troopers"?)


              Exactly!
          7. -1
            22 August 2014 07: 31
            Quote: Tor Hummer
            And this is right, because people who have confirmed the right to vote, and not all who got it, should vote.

            And you, a hammer, confirmed the right to vote? Or did you tryn’t come in? Can you not answer? The question is rhetorical.
            1. 0
              22 August 2014 16: 06
              Quote: Be proud.
              And you, a hammer, confirmed the right to vote? Or did you tryn’t come in? Can you not answer? The question is rhetorical.

              If a similar procedure is introduced, I will try to confirm. In the meantime, it is your question from the category "went to potrenet".
      2. Mih
        +2
        21 August 2014 22: 48
        As for the bet on the internal split of the elite, we know that under certain conditions the sense of self-preservation of the leaders is triggered, and personnel cleansing is done quite toughly, despite friendly ties and acquaintances.
      3. 0
        21 August 2014 23: 52
        And they will not be. The system of transfer of power will be changed, thanks to idiots from the USA.
        1. +1
          22 August 2014 00: 15
          Quote: tolian
          And they will not be. The system of transfer of power will be changed, thanks to idiots from the USA.


          An interesting conclusion. only it is not clear on the basis of what it is made of.
      4. +5
        22 August 2014 00: 04
        elections, elections, candidates-pi ... s! - for this line the whole song was written! There are no "fair" elections in any country. VEZDE STATEMENT under the name "DEMOCRACY"
        1. 0
          22 August 2014 00: 14
          Maybe not all, but Lyashko is for sure.
      5. +1
        22 August 2014 00: 28
        Quote: sergey261180
        Why elections then?

        there will be no election ... And 3,14 there will be no more.
        Will be the White Tsar of the Russian land!
    3. +11
      21 August 2014 22: 26
      Hmm ... In Russia, the presidential election only in 2018. But in the states in 2016, the question arises of who are facing the events in 2017. No need to drive a wave ... I think our president has already proved his worth !!! Enough of the Russian revolution ... Let the states experiment !!! Color revolutions will return to their creator ... !!!
      1. +50
        21 August 2014 22: 35
        What Putin did for Russia:
        • Over 12 years, Putin increased Russia's budget by 22 times, military spending - 30 times, GDP - 12 times (Russia jumped from 36th place in the world in terms of GDP to 6th place),
        • Increased gold and currency reserves by 48 times!
        • returned 256 mineral deposits to the Russian jurisdiction (it remains to ... turn 3!).
        • tore apart the most enslaving “liberal” in the history of production sharing agreements.
        • nationalized 65% of the oil industry and 95% of the gas and many other industries.
        • raised industry and agriculture (for 5 consecutive years Russia has been taking the 2nd-3rd place in the world in grain export, overtaking the United States, which is now in 4th place).
        • increased average salaries in the public sector by 18,5 times over 12 years, and average pensions by 14 times.
        • Well, just a trifle: Putin (he) reduced the extinction of Russia's population from 1,5 million people a year in 1999 to 21 thousand in 2011, i.e. 71,5 times.
        • In addition, Putin canceled the Khasavyurt agreement - by which he defended the integrity of Russia, made public the 5th column of NGOs and forbade deputies to have accounts abroad, defended Syria, and stopped the war in Chechnya.
        repaid a huge foreign debt, about 400 billion dollars
        Held the best ever winning Olympics
        Well, he returned the Crimea ....
        1. +6
          21 August 2014 23: 02
          Statistics is a stubborn thing you can't argue with. You can do more than the president - do it !!! Anyone can scratch their tongue while sitting at the entrance, and when it is necessary to remove the garbage, which lies near the entrance for weeks, somehow such "omnipotent" are quickly blown away!
        2. +3
          21 August 2014 23: 28
          "we have more to do than done"
          1. DMB-88
            +1
            22 August 2014 01: 34
            Quote: OldWiser
            we have more to do than done "


            According to sociologists in 2010, compared with the 2002 census, the population declined by 2,2 million, or 1,6%. The reduction is caused by the excess of mortality over fertility, which could not compensate for the migration increase.
            According to the report “Russia in the Face of Demographic Challenges”, prepared in 2010 by the UN in cooperation with the Higher School of Economics, the Russian population will continue to decline and will reach 2050 million people by 116.

            By the number of inhabitants, the country will move from 9th to 14th place in the world, Ethiopia, Egypt, Congo (Zaire), the Philippines and Mexico will be ahead of it.
            1. +2
              22 August 2014 07: 54
              Quote: DMB-88
              According to the report “Russia in the Face of Demographic Challenges”, prepared in 2010 by the UN in cooperation with the Higher School of Economics, the Russian population will continue to decline and will reach 2050 million people by 116.

              The UN in cooperation with the HSE is a terrible force! Considering that the HSE was created by Gaidar. You can look for other data on how the population of Russia declined, "thanks" to the work of this school, in the period since 1992, when this school was founded. And what about the forecasts .. , these are just words, letters and numbers on paper. Without taking into account a number of factors: economic, social, political and others.
        3. -2
          21 August 2014 23: 40
          Quote: herruvim
          What Putin did for Russia:

          It also carries out reforms in education (USE) and health care (the transformation of health care into commercial medicine)
          Quote: herruvim
          • raised industry

          Which industries specifically and numbers please.
          Quote: herruvim
          and agriculture (Russia for 5 consecutive years, ranks 2-3rd in the world in grain exports, ahead of the United States, which is now in 4th place).

          Who owns the largest agricultural holdings for grain production and who has the right to land used by these agricultural holdings?
          Quote: herruvim
          Putin (he) reduced the extinction of the Russian population from 1,5 million people a year in 1999 to 21 thousand in 2011, i.e. 71,5 times.

          How did Putin (exactly) "reduce extinction"?
          By means of statistical tricks and with the help of mass importation of migrants from Middle Asia and granting them Russian citizenship.
          Quote: herruvim
          He stopped the war in Chechnya.

          Reconciled with the worst enemies of the Russians and actually paying tribute to Chechnya.
          Quote: herruvim
          repaid a huge foreign debt, about 400 billion dollars

          What a fine fellow! Instead of spending this money on the development of their country. Creditors would wait, no matter where they went.
          Quote: herruvim
          Held the best ever winning Olympics

          And who now in the light of recent events cares?
          Quote: herruvim
          Well, he returned the Crimea ...

          There would be no Maidan - there would be no Crimea. Or is Maidan Putin too?
        4. DMB-88
          +3
          21 August 2014 23: 42
          These statistics were taken from the "United Russia"?
          Quote: herruvim
          Held the best ever winning Olympics

          Are you sure that the money spent on OI-12 gave an impetus to the development of children's sports in the regions?
          Quote: herruvim
          Well, that's a trifle: Putin (he) reduced the extinction of the Russian population from 1,5 million people a year in 1999 to 21 thousand in 2011, i.e. 71,5 times.

          For your information, the data of the last census are classified as "sov.secret"
        5. DMB-88
          +3
          22 August 2014 00: 03
          Quote: herruvim
          Increased gold reserves by 48 times!


          Which are stored in the securities of "partners" from the United States!

          According to the Central Bank, Russian banks and enterprises exported $ 2014 billion from Russia in the first quarter of 50,6. Compared to the same period of 2013, net capital outflow grew by 1,8 times. This follows from the data posted on the Bank of Russia website

          http://q99.it/Bb2zBNo
        6. +5
          22 August 2014 02: 02
          Quote: herruvim
          What Putin did for Russia:

          Somehow I always voted against Putin, but look at the numbers like that ...
          It’s like with Stalin, it seems to be a dictator, but Stalin took the country with a plow, and left it with an atomic bomb, and even with it the country defeated a monstrously powerful enemy in that terrible war
          1. DMB-88
            -1
            22 August 2014 02: 09
            Quote: skeket
            Somehow all the time voted against Putin


            there are a lot of such, but not all were included in the calculations and statistics of Churov! he has 146% in favor am and a niggardly tear from the "Siberian" in gratitude ...
        7. +3
          22 August 2014 03: 39
          BooooBooo big plus you buddy.
        8. +1
          22 August 2014 07: 33
          Quote: herruvim
          nationalized

          Remind me when it was, I still haven’t heard the words nationalization from the lips of statesmen.
      2. 0
        21 August 2014 23: 57
        And they are already starting to return.
        1. DMB-88
          +2
          22 August 2014 00: 12
          Quote: tolian
          And they are already starting to return.

          According to the head of the joint venture Sergey Stepashin, the total amount of violations in the field of budget legislation, compared with 2012, increased three times and amounted to 187,2 billion rubles. All the money that Stepashin spoke of must have gone out of the economy “into the shadows” —were withdrawn from the country.
          1. +1
            22 August 2014 00: 19
            Quote: DMB-88

            According to the head of the joint venture Sergey Stepashin, the total amount of violations in the field of budget legislation, compared with 2012, increased three times and amounted to 187,2 billion rubles. All the money that Stepashin spoke of must have gone out of the economy “into the shadows” —were withdrawn from the country.


            Excuse me, when did Stepashin publish this data? He no longer runs the joint venture
            1. DMB-88
              +2
              22 August 2014 00: 46
              On February 15, the State Duma at a plenary session heard a report on the work of the Accounts Chamber of Russia in 2012. According to the head of the joint venture Sergey Stepashin, the total amount of violations in the field of budget legislation.

              I apologize, "compared to 2011" - a typo! hi
        2. 0
          22 August 2014 00: 15
          Quote: tolian
          And they are already starting to return.


          Specific numbers, please.
          1. DMB-88
            +2
            22 August 2014 00: 22
            Quote: Normal
            Quote: tolian
            And they are already starting to return.


            Specific numbers, please.


            So, according to the results of the first quarter of this year, the volume of direct investments in the real sector of the Russian economy (more precisely, in what remains of it) not only decreased by a few percent, but collapsed almost 3,5 times - from $ 37,1 to $ 11,9 billion. This clearly demonstrates the paralysis of investment activity - not only foreign investors, but also Russian oligarchs, who account for 60 to 70% of the total inflow of foreign capital coming to Russia from offshore jurisdictions, do not want to invest in the Russian economy (Cyprus, Netherlands, Luxembourg, British Virgin Islands, etc.).
            1. DMB-88
              +3
              22 August 2014 00: 33
              Quote: DMB-88
              Specific numbers, please.

              It is worth saying that in the expert community the level of professionalism and competence of the leadership of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is well known. In the conditions of an extremely favorable foreign economic situation and high energy prices (for 12 years, irreplaceable mineral raw materials were exported to Russia by 3,3 trillion dollars - 150% of Russia's GDP in 2012 prices), it managed to hook the Russian economy on the needle of foreign loans (foreign growth debt of all economic entities from 535 billion dollars in January 2012 to 687 billion dollars in April 2013), ensured the maintenance of a chronic shortage of money in the economy (the level of monetization of the economy does not exceed 43% of GDP compared to 100-110% in the Eurozone and 170-220% in the “Asian tigers”) and blocking any modernization and development of the non-oil industry are unacceptably high interest rates on loans (17-22% for small and medium-sized businesses with a profitability of the Russian economy for assets of 6,5%, and for goods sold and services (9,6%), the continued withdrawal of supposedly “excess” money supply from the economy and the financing of modernization and innovation from strategic competitors (more than $ 510 billion was exported). It is not surprising that the Central Bank could not offer anything other than the illegal export of capital to the Central Bank as an argument. On other issues (as, incidentally, on this issue, too), the Bank of Russia has already shown the full degree of its unsuitability for business and has revealed a balance of interests that is clearly leaning towards transnational corporations and international banks, and not towards the national interests of Russia and its citizens.
    4. AVV
      +3
      21 August 2014 23: 27
      Quote: comm
      Something I have no doubt that in our country they will be able to properly and timely clean up the political clearing for the elections. How many times have this procedure been observed ...

      Everything will be fine :)

      Whatever was good, then our special services, foreign intelligence and the FSB should work ahead of the curve so that they don’t leave the slightest chance to leave the Anglo-Saxon scum !!! As a rule, during any election they try to destabilize the situation through all kinds of NGOs, it’s better to completely destroy them in advance !!! So that money doesn’t come to Russia, neither Nemtsov nor Navalny !!!
    5. 0
      22 August 2014 03: 18
      Quote: comm
      Something I have no doubt that in our country they will be able to properly and timely clean up the political clearing for the elections. How many times have this procedure been observed ...

      Everything will be fine :)

      And what? It’s possible to learn from Lukashenko ... I think he will advise ... feel
      1. DMB-88
        0
        22 August 2014 12: 06
        Quote: papik09
        And what? It’s possible to learn from Lukashenko ... I think he will advise ..


        It would be better if our government and the president adopted the experience of Lukashenko in the field of economic policy !!!
    6. 0
      22 August 2014 05: 45
      staff cleansing is quite tough, despite friendships and acquaintances.


      Hurry already, otherwise the people were waiting.
    7. vell.65mail.ru
      0
      22 August 2014 06: 17
      In this case, answer_in which country is this procedure more democratic, maybe in the same states?
    8. +1
      22 August 2014 07: 30
      Quote: comm
      Everything will be fine :)

      How good is that? Now, how is liberal oligarchic capitalism now?
    9. 0
      22 August 2014 07: 53
      When there was a swamp in our Urals and in the Volga region, a cry was thrown to go and defeat the swamp angry if the cops do not disperse so that we will not pass the Maidan
    10. 0
      22 August 2014 11: 32
      They won’t get any good, even if there is a Russian Maidan, then even I will come to the Russian anti-Maidan.
  2. +5
    21 August 2014 21: 54
    Yes, who would not bet. Put everyone on Kol. (my humble opinion)
    1. +6
      21 August 2014 22: 56
      Sternly, however, although I think some people deserve a decent flogging, we will not clarify the names lol.In my opinion, it is high time to drive all the liberals with a nasty broom from all power structures. If they want liberal values, so let them p ... go to their Europe for the dough ... if it is not measured, there is something to live there, but here it is not necessary to poison the atmosphere, the authorities should have patriots of their country and homeland, they would clear everything Augean stables from any liberalism, at least which is in power, I'm not talking about the "stars" of show business, let them spoil the air, and they would get to them in time, but first in the power to clean. They would just breathe more freely getting rid of this dirt. Eh, dreams, dreams.
      1. +7
        21 August 2014 23: 05
        Well, or plant, with complete confiscation, for robbery, and not let the brakes go, anyone who knows what kind of defense service business is talking about, stole a rabbit or a bag of potatoes, three years, stole billions, house arrest or was acquitted for lack of proof or time for the period of house arrest it is plus and free, such arithmetic.
  3. +13
    21 August 2014 21: 54
    I hope the elites grow wiser and remember that any revolution eats its children. Not who does not want to be eaten :)
    1. +4
      21 August 2014 22: 27
      Quote: CrazyMishka
      I hope the elites grow wiser and remember that any revolution eats its children. Not who does not want to be eaten :)


      This fact (eating children) has been known since the French Revolution. So what? Did it stop someone?
      It is simply impossible to bring things to the revolution.
  4. +13
    21 August 2014 21: 58
    I think that in general the author is right. Well, in particular, we'll see. And good luck to you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, we are with you and our Russia.
    1. AVIATOR36662
      +4
      21 August 2014 22: 44
      It is unlikely that the GDP will allocate an entire floor for the CIA in Lubyanka and it is unlikely that the US ambassador will hand over diplomas to graduates of our FSB academy. So the chances of an orange revolution in Russia are only theoretical, are close to zero.
      1. +2
        21 August 2014 23: 26
        Tell me, who gives diplomas to graduates of the Higher School of Economics?
        1. DMB-88
          +2
          22 August 2014 00: 51
          Quote: s.cot
          Tell me, who gives diplomas to graduates of the Higher School of Economics?


          Of course "partners" from the USA.
          And they wrote us a constitution and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is completely dependent on the US Federal Reserve !!!
          1. nvv
            nvv
            +1
            22 August 2014 00: 59
            Well .. Dembel .. you know everything .. there’s nothing to add. request
            1. DMB-88
              +3
              22 August 2014 01: 15
              Quote: nvv
              Well .. Dembel .. you know everything .. there’s nothing to add.

              Hi, there! this is I enlighten the people !!!))) lol
              1. nvv
                nvv
                +1
                22 August 2014 01: 42
                Hey. The people who have lost our way. For the desks of all, as in the 20s. angry
                1. DMB-88
                  +2
                  22 August 2014 01: 52
                  wassat
                  Quote: nvv
                  Hey. The people who have lost our way. For the desks of all, as in the 20s.


                  Can you imagine how tired of people who are now shouting unreasonable "urrrrya" GDP, and in a couple of three months, when everything will rise in price, including housing and communal services, food, fuel, etc., they will again blame either the 5th or 6th columns, in general, what the zomboyaschik will throw! you start to speak out and Damn, they do not even argue, but they figure their own "minuses", and you sit in aaa ... xxx .... e and do not understand why !!! lol
                  1. +2
                    22 August 2014 09: 28
                    Not because of the "minuses" it is unpleasant, but the fact that the people do not understand where we are going. After the EBN, after the 90s, after Chechnya, it is forgivable. It is necessary to say every day, until Chubais is sitting and alive, I don’t believe Putin!
                    1. DMB-88
                      0
                      22 August 2014 11: 22
                      Quote: s.cot
                      Not because of the "minuses" it is unpleasant, but the fact that the people do not understand where we are going. After the EBN, after the 90s, after Chechnya, it is forgivable. It is necessary to say every day, until Chubais is sitting and alive, I don’t believe Putin!


                      You are rightly talking about Chubais, but know one thing: Putin is the successor to Yeltsin, and that says it all !!!!! hi
  5. +14
    21 August 2014 21: 59
    Well, that’s all right. There is only one conclusion - every citizen of our Motherland needs to be more demanding not only about others, but also about himself. Primarily. And no longer click e..om, hoping for good foreign uncles and aunts. And one more thing ... Citizens of Russia, take care of each other! No one else will take care of us!
    1. DMB-88
      +7
      21 August 2014 22: 22
      Quote: Jovanni
      Citizens of Russia, take care of each other! No one else will take care of us!


      What a wonderful word "Comrade" all the same!
  6. DMB-88
    +4
    21 August 2014 22: 03
    Why should someone bet on someone!
    Do not forget that in our country there is HIS MAJESTY PEOPLE!
    And I, in a sinful affair, believe that the People will decide with whom to go to a brighter future!
    and all these articles are a breakdown for lice and measurements of the degree of public opinion.
    1. sergey261180
      +1
      21 August 2014 22: 11
      Quote: DMB-88
      Do not forget that in our country there is HIS MAJESTY PEOPLE!

      Oh, do not tell! laughing
      1. DMB-88
        +4
        21 August 2014 22: 20
        Quote: sergey261180
        Oh, do not tell!


        I’m not even trying, but I remind you that there are still people!) hi
        1. sergey261180
          +3
          21 August 2014 22: 27
          Quote: DMB-88
          I’m not even trying, but I remind you that there are still people!)

          Nobody will ask the people. And 90% of the people don't care who will sit in the Kremlin. Whoever they say on TV that "he is doing everything right" is the one who will be doted on.
          1. DMB-88
            +2
            21 August 2014 22: 32
            Quote: sergey261180
            Whoever they say on TV that "he is doing everything right" is the one who will be doted on.


            I agree with you, the zombie man does his dirty deed, but people know how and where they live!
          2. +2
            22 August 2014 00: 31
            So, information for consideration: in Ukraine, the broadcasting of Russian channels was turned off and the bulk of the population absorbs information from Ukrainian dormitories. I have friends and relatives living there and those who manage to compare Ukrainian and Russian information programs on a satellite dish, all, without exception, are inclined to the side of the Russian media. Yes, in the upcoming events, the media will have tremendous power.
          3. 0
            22 August 2014 10: 27
            What are you fixated on the Kremlin? Everyone knows their deputies, and they must)) back and forth and more.
    2. +5
      21 August 2014 22: 24
      Quote: DMB-88
      Do not forget that in our country there is HIS MAJESTY PEOPLE!

      May riot police help us.
  7. +9
    21 August 2014 22: 05
    It’s high time to put the fifth column in place. And those who will be against it, let them go where they see democracy!
  8. +5
    21 August 2014 22: 16
    I hope that in Baghdad ... Ugh, in the Donbass everything will be calm very soon ... (I mean absolutely PEACEFUL life)
  9. +9
    21 August 2014 22: 16
    In Russia, 2 times over the last century there were periods when it was on the verge of destruction: 1) 1st MV - Revolution of 1917; 2) Perestroika - the 90s. The main cause of these crises were liberals and national traitors in the ruling circles. In 1917, the Bolsheviks simply picked up power, which they took into their own hands, but the liberals did not try to hold on to. The collapse of the USSR occurred in much the same way.
    The situation was completely different during the Second World War.
    Dostoevsky said: "If someone ruins Russia, it will not be communists, not anarchists, but damned liberals."
    1. 0
      22 August 2014 01: 30
      I do not agree. Russia will ultimately be destroyed by corruption and nepotism.
  10. +2
    21 August 2014 22: 19
    Much, if not all, depends on how solid the solidarity between the country's population and the national leader and leadership is.
    This is in my opinion the main thing. If the country's population is not greedy for "cookies" (no matter where, from the State Department or from the oligarchs) there will be no Maidan. If the leadership, not in word but in deed, will work for the good of Russia, put an end to corruption, and take care of the rights and welfare of the population, then there will be complete solidarity.
    1. DMB-88
      +1
      21 August 2014 22: 34
      Quote: B.T.A.
      If the leadership, not just in words but in practice, works for the good of Russia, puts an end to corruption, takes care of the rights and welfare of the population, then there will be complete solidarity.


      You hope that the "leadership" will see the light right now for the last 23 years or anyone else for the last 15 years
  11. +3
    21 August 2014 22: 23
    Putin is a statesman, and he gets the confrontation in the government, where there are a lot of liberals. (Not all of course) But those who put sticks in the wheels of becoming a power are quite enough. In my opinion, V.V. Putin needs to reconsider his inner circle and leave only like-minded people, which will help raise the economy. The liberal development of the economy is a road to nowhere. (for Russia)
    1. DMB-88
      +4
      21 August 2014 22: 39
      Quote: Lexandrich
      Putin is a statesman, and he gets the confrontation in the government, where many liberals sit


      I just want to remind you that this government was the prime minister of GDP 2 years ago.
      and a certain LADY has been guarding the "Glanoe Armchair" for 4 years (at the request of the same VVP before the people of the operation successor), is in friendly and crony relations with VVP ...
    2. +1
      21 August 2014 22: 41
      right, but how to do it, tea, do not change shoes
  12. VICTOR-61
    0
    21 August 2014 22: 23
    Yes, we don’t have a substitute for GDP. It suits us. The upsurge of patriotism in the country has increased. Our agriculture has begun to rise, and much more will be thanks to our president. And different American-European mongrel like NEMTSOV and other minions, we don’t need their place in prison.
    1. DMB-88
      +2
      21 August 2014 23: 50
      Quote: VICTOR-61
      there will be much more good thanks to our president, and different American-European mongrel like NEMTSOV and other minions we don’t need their place in prison


      And Serdyukov, Skrynnik, Chubais and many others, where do you think they should be? and "Nemtsov" I myself hate to endure !!!
      1. +2
        22 August 2014 01: 40
        Nemtsov is just a mongrel. But Serdyukov, Skrynnik, Chubais and many others are the heroes of our time. And they will remain heroes until the little girl their ice ax touches. And so they are successful managers and the majority of young people are equal to them. Idols so to speak
        1. DMB-88
          0
          22 August 2014 11: 26
          Quote: KBR109
          And so they are successful managers and the majority of young people are equal to them. Idols so to speak


          About times, about morals ......
  13. +5
    21 August 2014 22: 30
    vopros v tom kak voplotit v zizn mecty naroda, a gorstki vorov
  14. +5
    21 August 2014 22: 35
    Cooking Maidan - go to Magadan!
  15. +4
    21 August 2014 22: 36
    From the Anglo-Saxons you always have to wait for some kind of dirty trick. The British Empire, a small, island nation, ruled world politics thanks to intrigue and backstage conspiracies.
  16. +9
    21 August 2014 22: 37
    And this force, he suggests, could well become the so-called political and economic elite of the country, which the West is now persistently trying to split

    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/859/vybi650.jpg
  17. Sergeqr
    +5
    21 August 2014 22: 37
    There will be no upheaval. am
    It will be a fist. In a brazen, cunning European face. hi
    1. +2
      21 August 2014 23: 40
      Quote: Sergeqr
      It will be a fist. In a brazen, cunning European face.

      I would also like the "red", impudent muzzle to get it.
  18. +2
    21 August 2014 22: 37
    Starikov has very interesting and informative books. I recommend it.
  19. Belisarios
    +2
    21 August 2014 22: 37
    All periods of the rise of Russia were associated with personalities of a historical level. Peter the Great, Ivan the Terrible, Catherine the Great, Stalin. And vice versa - ebn, slurred rulers of the time of troubles and the period between Peter 1 and Elizabeth.
    A collegiate gathering without an alpha leader is the ideal tool for spreading chaos. As the provisional government of 1917, the seven-boyars. They sculpted a "just cause" out of mudachy. It did not grow together. They will try again.
  20. +3
    21 August 2014 22: 39
    Quote: Magic Archer
    It’s high time to put the fifth column in place. And those who will be against it, let them go where they see democracy!

    They will never leave themselves. This is where they are fighters against the regime, fighters for democracy. And who needs them there. There are enough of our own mongrels .... And nobody has canceled the work for the good of the Motherland. "Extinguish" once, if not enough - again. And so on until complete correction ... lol lol lol
  21. +6
    21 August 2014 22: 42
    Yes, they envy us all that we have V.V. Putin

    1. -1
      21 August 2014 23: 49
      Quote: Kenji
      Yes, they envy us all that we have V.V. Putin

      “The people of the United States want Vladimir Putin to be its president.
      Moreover, the veterans of the US Armed Forces acted as leaders and initiators of this process.


      http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/11/putin4prez/

      He guards the borders of his country;
      he protects his citizens abroad;
      he banned gay propaganda in schools;
      he pursues financial criminals;
      he imprisons those who blaspheme in churches;
      he puts the interests of the country above his own.
      Putin to the President!

      So and so, 20% of the United States (Alaska) is Russian land. And the West coast from Frisco to the north is also Russian land historically. That by joining Russia, the Americans will get a normal education system.
      That those who are against holding a referendum for the United States to join Russia are outside the law and the Constitution themselves.
      That already all over America, those who support this action have printed millions of stickers and hang them on the bumpers of their cars "Putin for President, he is at least competent!"
      Well, if someone objects that Putin cannot be President and the United States because he was not born in the United States, then Obama is also not born in the United States, but for some reason the President. "
  22. +1
    21 August 2014 22: 43
    In the next two to four years, the West will try to organize a coup in Russia by analogy with the Ukrainian Maidan in order to remove Vladimir Putin, writer and economist Nikolai Starikov.
    our dear Author, let’s take care specifically, or a writer - a tragic (?), or an economist - a swindler? He thinks that the Russian man is like a "Turk" ..., does not have his own mind, experience, ... or sits somewhere in a hut without light, SMS and "box"!
    I only have anger at such "analysts" (from the word analysis!).
    1. 0
      22 August 2014 08: 19
      You are so boiling in vain. Nikolay Starikov, an intelligent and worthy man, a patriot of his country, who, speaking of threats from the West, wants the Russian man to not relax, be vigilant, and do not consider his compatriots stupid, dark people.
    2. Fortnite
      0
      22 August 2014 13: 24
      "Analists" however ... That's exactly how Starikov has ... (analists)
      1. 0
        23 August 2014 01: 19
        Dear, do not bend over. If you do not like something, this does not mean that Starikov is poorly versed in the geopolitical topic.
  23. Mih
    0
    21 August 2014 22: 45
    Quote: comm
    clean up the political clearing for the elections.

    But it is very significant that the United States proposed John Tefft, the new ambassador to Russia, who is well known for his specific skills in organizing all kinds of “color revolutions”. He has already managed to practice in this matter, including in Georgia. fellow
  24. Justas
    +1
    21 August 2014 22: 47
    The external enemy of Russia is not terrible, with Putin or without Putin, and the fifth column is not terrible if the nation is healthy and with immunity everything is in order, and this is determined by the state of morality in the country.
    1. 0
      22 August 2014 01: 46
      It remains for us to evaluate the state of this same morality. In my unenlightened view - not really ...
  25. Mih
    0
    21 August 2014 22: 47
    It will be a fist. In a brazen, cunning European face

    As for the bet on the internal split of the elite, we know that under certain conditions the sense of self-preservation of the leaders is triggered, and personnel cleansing is done quite toughly, despite friendly ties and acquaintances. love
  26. +2
    21 August 2014 22: 47
    You will not wait !!! Russians, we must know the enemy by sight: the author of color revolutions is Gene Sharp. This nasty old man figured out how to start a revolution with disgruntled grannies swearing the government; young people who are not ready to work .... etc. We saw this in Ukraine - the aunts carried jars of cucumbers to the Maidan, and everyone knows how it ended. Although the terrible tale about "democracy" has not yet been told. This Gene Sharp offers seemingly harmless forms of protest: join hands, lined up for many kilometers; sit-ins, attacks on the police ... We saw how Navalny stopped the crowd in front of Bolotnaya Square and forced them to sit on the asphalt !!! People sat down, and those who were pushing from behind were told that the police would not let them in. And then they rushed to the police ... And it started !!! We must know that this is technology that is fueling a revolution. We need it ?! And I believe in Putin !!!
  27. 0
    21 August 2014 22: 49
    It is always necessary to systematically “work” with the "fifth" column so that it realizes its worthlessness, deceit and cheapness. So that Western puppeteers always have systemic failures in Russia. And, in principle, it is useful to feed the 5th column with the sechestics themselves - let the "democratic" crap foul the brains of the "lights of democracy".
  28. 0
    21 August 2014 22: 51
    I agree with someone that the fifth and sixth columns need to be strangled. Liberastov in the same firebox. Listened (as a masochist) today Echo of Moscow ... Bad for me. Can vomit? Although ... Maxim Shevchenko seems to be in the subject.
  29. 0
    21 August 2014 22: 57
    As for the bet on the internal split of the elite, we know that under certain conditions the sense of self-preservation of the leaders is triggered, and personnel cleansing is done quite toughly, despite friendly ties and acquaintances.

    It is high time to clear the power of liberal husk.
  30. 0
    21 August 2014 23: 00
    and affairs on Rusnano prove that the process of cleansing of liberals in the economy has already begun. Now the main thing is not to let people turn off this path, or else the forecast of the liberal centers that actually carry out disguised opposition to GDP will come true or the country will be in a fever for some time. Do we need it?
  31. skifo
    +1
    21 August 2014 23: 00
    Wow, and the difficult task of the ambassador (ambassador to ...) due to the fact that the people oh as they remember the 90s - too little time has passed! But there were all sorts of bulk, etc. and it was a call to our leader. And it was precisely the marsh rallies that pushed Putin to decisive action and finally forced him to solve the problems of his homeland! And when he got down to business, began to call a spade a spade - then it started: and patriotism grew and the rating and bile from the west, etc. I wish you good health and good luck to the GDP and to those who support it! And the Russians support him, rally and start with themselves!
  32. Mih
    0
    21 August 2014 23: 01
    Quote: sergey261180
    Why elections then?

    Not a single bank, not a single oligarch, not a single oligarchic company fell under sanctions. This is a direct message: if you are next to the president, if you enter his inner circle, then we will hit you. love
  33. Mih
    0
    21 August 2014 23: 03
    I agree with someone that the fifth and sixth columns need to be strangled. Liberastov in the same firebox.

    In the next two to four years, the West will try to organize a coup in Russia by analogy with the Ukrainian Maidan in order to remove Vladimir Putin. feel
  34. FACKtoREAL
    0
    21 August 2014 23: 04
    The aftor girl put out a spicy stream of boiling water "under the covers" ... lol
    as an article "Ah, the cab faq is awful!" crying

    MadameNOT BZD.T! soldier
    truncated - UNDER the evonous UNUSUAL CONTROL! belay
    wassat
  35. waisson
    +2
    21 August 2014 23: 08
    ------------- am and to blame for all wars ---- hi
    1. 0
      22 August 2014 07: 18
      Zhizha rye !!!
  36. Mih
    +1
    21 August 2014 23: 08
    Quote: herruvim
    What Putin did for Russia

    In the next two to four years, the West will try to organize a coup in Russia by analogy with the Ukrainian Maidan in order to remove Vladimir Putin. So he did that the West went mad. request
  37. waisson
    +4
    21 August 2014 23: 09
    ----------------- am
  38. waisson
    +6
    21 August 2014 23: 10
    ----------------- hi
  39. +7
    21 August 2014 23: 15
    I have the honor to put the first minus in this article.

    For the title does not match the content of the article.
    Elite Forces of Coup

    Of all the Elite forces, only one Siluan is named.
    That's it!
    Elite forces ran out of a coup sucked from a finger.
    Besides
    Anton G. Siluanov (April 12, 1963, Moscow) is a Russian politician and economist. From December 16, 2011 Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation. Member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation. Member of the Supreme Council of the United Russia Party[1

    And according to paragraph "d" of Article 83 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President
    at the suggestion of the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation appoints and dismisses Deputy Prime Ministers of the Russian Federation, federal ministers;

    And also according to point "g"
    forms and heads the Security Council of the Russian Federation, ...

    Those. this member of the Supreme Council of the pro-presidential party has been elected to the Security Council and appointed by the President himself as federal minister.
    If the Author considers the appointee of GDP to be the elite of the coup, then does the Author consider Putin a short-sighted and careless person?
    Or maybe the author considers his readers a little not smart people?
    1. DMB-88
      +5
      21 August 2014 23: 27
      Quote: Normal
      If the Author considers the appointee of GDP to be the elite of the coup, then does the Author consider Putin a short-sighted and careless person?
      Or maybe the author considers his readers a little not smart people?


      The boss must always be responsible for his subordinates!
      Here is another article "-"
  40. 0
    21 August 2014 23: 19
    I WILL ANSWER DIRECTLY, IN RUSSIAN, LIKE AN OLD SOLDIER: "EVERYONE DREAMS ABOUT IT", AND IF YOU DO NOT get it, SIBERIA IS BOOG !!! IT IS POSSIBLE TO GO PINE - TO SAW ON MATCHES, IT IS POSSIBLE TO GO - TUNDRA TO SKIP, AND IT IS POSSIBLE AND .......
  41. +1
    21 August 2014 23: 21
    What kind of shit source does the article have?
    1. +2
      22 August 2014 00: 16
      Quote: WIN969
      What kind of shit source does the article have?

      "KM.RU in Russia." further under the link - "Free Press".
      I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS THE NEWSPAPER HERE TITLES FOR 22.08.14:
      - No foreign land!
      Why Russians do not want new territories to join the country
      -Return of the "wooden"
      What is behind the desire of the European Union to make the ruble a non-convertible currency
      Secondary coagulation of NEP
      Sergei Mitrofanov on the traditions of the struggle against private capitalism
      - The crisis of the old man's confidence
      The authorities have actually recognized the failure of the highly publicized pension reform
      -Stalin in a raspberry butterfly
      Alexey Shorokhov about his expectations from the meeting in Minsk
      Refugees to nowhere
      Why Ukrainians who wish to stay in Russia, are sent to places where there is no work, even for local
      - “Unbearable hysterical intonation of the media”
      On the anniversary of the death of critic and publicist Viktor Toporov, Free Press publishes one of his last interviews.
      Well, and so on.
  42. Kosanovskaya74
    +1
    21 August 2014 23: 25
    It’s necessary to clean the entire upper elite in time and strictly enforce the law on businessmen and not businessmen on law. Do not just fill your pockets, but think that you will leave it to the future generation of the country. AND THINK YOU OIL AND GAS PRODUCED OR Nature and ancestors have been like this for centuries they all used what was left for us, and who would only get dispossessed of their pocket.
  43. +2
    21 August 2014 23: 26
    At the expense of sanctions, everything is the other way around! Everyone thought that those who had imposed sanctions would be outraged, but no, they were overwhelmed with pride because they were considered close to Putin!
  44. +4
    21 August 2014 23: 33
    Everyone understood everything, so this topic will not work with us.
  45. +4
    21 August 2014 23: 36
    Dear author, we have two weak points - this is corruption and the stratification of society. And if we assume the president instead of GDP is Glazyev, then mattresses will not feel better for sure. bully
  46. 0
    21 August 2014 23: 46
    Now the most important thing is not to follow the lead of various cheap demagogues. Our president is right because he is ours. Any unrest will lead to the fact that we may try to repeat the Ukrainian scenario.
  47. +3
    21 August 2014 23: 56
    Putin himself is a convinced liberal, therefore they will rather cleanse the patriots and negotiate with "our Western partners."
    1. 0
      22 August 2014 00: 22
      Quote: chunga-changa
      Putin himself is a convinced liberal, therefore they will rather cleanse the patriots and negotiate with "our Western partners."


      What makes you think that Putin is a liberal? He is rather a conservative.
    2. DMB-88
      0
      22 August 2014 02: 14
      Quote: chunga-changa
      Putin himself is a convinced liberal, therefore they will rather cleanse the patriots and negotiate with "our Western partners."


      It seems that we agreed with the "partners" long ago ... negative
  48. +2
    21 August 2014 23: 59
    The Ukrainian scenario will not work, although bastards like Nemtsov, Khakamada, Makarevich, Novodvorskaya, etc. must be cleaned now. Then it will be harder. Or the second option - you need such a mess in Europe or the USA, so that we don’t care.
    1. 0
      22 August 2014 00: 22
      Quote: vigor1288



      The Ukrainian scenario will not work, although bastards like Nemtsov, Khakamada, Makarevich, Novodvorskaya, etc. must be cleaned now.

      Well, you can already delete Novodvorskaya. As they say, either good or nothing. Well, nothing.
  49. MSA
    MSA
    +2
    22 August 2014 00: 19
    Be that as it may, but there are still people who are now seeing much better
    1. EsTaF
      0
      22 August 2014 03: 52
      A person can only see through something in his life. Or trying to achieve.
      Open a clothing company and not be dependent on officials, like on the mafia. Or start your own farm and keep it in good condition.

      And what did the Russian people achieve? What tried! achieve the Russian people. Thousands of lawyers and architects of new buildings near Moscow. Enikeyshchikov among the rich. The officials and their entourage.
      But did he try to change something over the past 20 years or so ... m years?

      so far, he has not received his sight and it is unlikely that something will happen in the future. But man is so arranged that he cannot stand still even if he does not want to do anything himself.

      Everything is". Gas, useful resources. Maybe that's why there is nothing ...
  50. 0
    22 August 2014 00: 22
    Says Comrade PUTIN victory will be ours !!! soldier
    1. EsTaF
      0
      22 August 2014 03: 53
      Glory to the CPSU !!!
  51. The comment was deleted.
  52. -1
    22 August 2014 00: 51
    But it is very significant that the United States proposed John Tefft, the new ambassador to Russia, who is well known for his specific skills in organizing all kinds of “color revolutions”. He has already managed to practice in this matter, including in Georgia.

    Гораздо показательней другое
    Кремль одобрил кандидатуру Теффта на пост посла США в России

    Assistant to the President of Russia
    Юрий Ушаков подтвердил, что Россия одобрила предложенную Вашингтоном кандидатуру Джона Теффта на пост посла США в Москве. «Да, агреман дан», — заявил Ю. Ушаков журналистам на брифинге в Москве.

    На вопрос о том, не смущает ли Москву репутация Теффта как «агрессивного» дипломата, «не всегда лояльного российским интересам», Ушаков ответил: «В отличие от многих я его знаю хорошо. Я бы сказал, что это дипломат высокого калибра в профессиональном плане. Как он себя вел в Грузии и на Украине — я оставляю без комментариев, поскольку всем это хорошо известно».

    For your information:
    Агреман
    (фр. agrement, от agreer — одобрить) — в международном праве согласие принимающего государства на назначение конкретного лица в качестве главы дипломатического представительства аккредитующего государства. Без получения А. нельзя официально назначить соответствующее лицо в качестве дипломатического представителя. Отказ в А., согласно установившейся практике и Венской конвенции о дипломатических сношениях 1961 г., необязательно должен быть мотивированным. Запрос А. и ответ на него, как правило, осуществляются в конфиденциальном порядке, причем не только в письменной, но подчас и в устной форме.

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Economics and Law


    Руководство России могло Without explaning the reason не дать одобрения на назначение Джона Теффта послом США в России. Но несмотря на то, что "специализация" Теффта хорошо известна агреман был дан.
    Следовательно ВВП не только не считает оранжевую революцию в России возможной, но и сознательно идет на провоцирование внесистемной оппозиции на активные действия для еще большего сплочения населения вокруг собственной персоны.
    А авторы подобных статеек только пудрят нам мозги (совместно со Стариковым) угрозами переворотов, пятыми колоннами, либералами против Путина и прочей провластно-пропагандистской хренью с той же самой целью - формирование тотальной поддержки низов либеральной экономической политики верхов.
    И надо признать, это им удается.
    1. +3
      22 August 2014 02: 46
      Давайте открутим пленку назад в 2010-2011 года и вспомним, какой разгул приняла кампания в интернете и западных СМИ по дискредитации Путина. Более мерзкое и противное происходит разве что сейчас, из-за Украины. Потоки мерзкой лжи, организованной западом с поддержкой нашими либералами, выливались на ВВП тоннами, лишь бы он не прошел на выборы в президенты. Запад прямо заявлял - Путин им в России не нужен. Они боялись его, а точнее его прихода к власти, как чумы. Прекрасно понимая, что он не будет ложиться под запад, а будет проводить свою независимою линию в государственной политике.
      Так как вы думаете, они откажутся от следующей попытки не допустить ВВП к власти на следующих выборах?
      У них теперь одна забота, устроить все что угодно, даже мировой коллапс, только бы отстранить его от власти в России. Не говоря уже о "цветных революциях".
      Что касается Теффта, то мне представляется если бы Россия дала его фигуре отказ, это было бы воспринято, как страх ВВП перед Теффтом и его "специализациями" по революциям. Дав одобрение, мы наоборот показали западу, что плевать хотели на их происки и совершенно не боимся их ставленников. Пусть лучше он будет здесь на глазах и под контролем, чем творить свои темные делишки и плести заговоры в какой-нибудь еще бывшей нашей республике.
      1. DMB-88
        0
        22 August 2014 03: 14
        Quote: ussr1960
        Запад прямо заявлял - Путин им в России не нужен. Они боялись его, а точнее его прихода к власти, как чумы. Прекрасно понимая, что он не будет ложиться под запад, а будет проводить свою независимою линию в государственной политике.


        Answer two questions:
        1)ВВ Путин капиталист?
        2)Какие противоречия могут быть между капиталистами?

        Когда Вы ответите на эти два вопроса, Вы поймёте и причины войны на украине,и хищническое разграбление природных ресурсов России,и вывоз капитала на запад, который западом же используется для внедрения собственных инноваций и т.д.
        feel Удачи Вам в познаниях капиталистического мира!
  53. -1
    22 August 2014 00: 56
    Вешать нужно показательно. В америке же вешают, у них там порядок. Вон негра с ножом замочил и все ок, а у нас бы этих ментов если не посадили, то уволил бы точно, от греха подальше.
  54. +1
    22 August 2014 02: 02
    Главное, что бы подло не убили, а там как нибудь отстоим!
  55. 0
    22 August 2014 02: 03
    Автор, что - Америку открыл? Народ давно уже своей "чуйкой" просёк,что с либерастами нам не по пути. И всё чаще это выносится и наверх. Другой вопрос, как наверху прислушиваются к голосу народа?
  56. 0
    22 August 2014 02: 21
    Вот как раз на волне этого высочайшего рейтинга, президенту надо предпринимать глобальные кадровые перестановки!
    Видя что сейчас происходит в мире, мне как то не по себе от того что в кресле премьера у нас человек которому реально симпатизируют правительства Запада. И не спроста наверное президент США во всеуслышание высказывал в его адрес, свои симпатии.
    Сразу после Украины, стоит перетряхнуть и наше правительство.
  57. +4
    22 August 2014 02: 43
    Quote: sergey261180
    Quote: comm
    Something I have no doubt that in our country they will be able to properly and timely clean up the political clearing for the elections. How many times have this procedure been observed ...

    Why elections then?

    А они и не нужны:-) Какие выборы во время войны? А война уже объявлена. На переправе коней не меняют.
    P.S. Да простит меня их демократский бог.
  58. +1
    22 August 2014 05: 32
    Дай бог России силу все выдержать и пережить это смутное время.
  59. +1
    22 August 2014 05: 49
    Теория будет подтверждена когда в среде оппозиции появится явный лидер,который мало мальски должен иметь популярность в народе и хоть как то конкурировать с В.В.Путиным, а это явно должно произойти к 2016 году. Попытка с Навальным не прокатила. Вообще, по моему мнению, Стариков компетентный аналитик истории и стоит прислушиваться к его прогнозам.
  60. +1
    22 August 2014 06: 17
    Quote: sergey261180
    Quote: comm
    Something I have no doubt that in our country they will be able to properly and timely clean up the political clearing for the elections. How many times have this procedure been observed ...

    Why elections then?

    Для изучения мнения населения и выбора наиболее выгодного вектора: качели Власть - Народ
  61. 0
    22 August 2014 07: 06
    "Переворот" готовится в столицах Европы и США. Готовится очень активно. Вчера ОБСЕ приняло резолюцию о "возвращении Крыма Украине". Ни много ни мало. То, что Крым добровольно вошел в состав России, а его население на референдуме проголосовало за это, не берется ни в какие расчеты агрессорами из ЕС. Таким образом, юридическая база нападения "объединенной Европы" на Крым уже готова. Что ж, милости просим. Этот гордиев узел в отношениях с Западом уже достал.
    Заседание ОБСЕ состоялось в Баку, что тоже символично, т.к. показывает, что господа из Европы обнаглели настолько, что готовы на любую политическую, а, возможно, и военную провокацию на Кавказе то же. МИД наш молчит. Хоть бы ноту какую написали и послали мерзавцам и их прихвостням в ответ, которые уже в открытую посягают на территорию России. Живут за наш счет и гадят, как шелудивые псы, где только можно.
  62. 0
    22 August 2014 07: 07
    Это конечно может и звучит красиво - но пока нашему Путину просто нет альтернативы(пусть не лучше, а хоть такого-же)и выбирать просто не из кого, так что фиг им а не переворот - не дождутся, да и народ не позволит.
    PS я не приверженец Путина - но других лидеров пока даже на горизонте невидно(это мое личное мнение), так что менять(а тем более свергать) его пока не накого.
  63. 0
    22 August 2014 07: 12
    [quote=Mole][quote=DV69]право избирать и быть избранным действительно нужно заслужить.Например, почему наркоман должен иметь равные права с боевым офицером?[/quote]
    Так-то, так, но тут и до нацизма недалеко! Право голоса дается с Российским гражданством. Наркоман имеет равные права на основании своего гражданства, а гастрабайтер - нет. Если он уже гражданин, то неважно какой у него социальный статус, он может голосовать или не ходить на выборы.

    Все правильно сказано! У гражданина нашей страны есть все права независимо от его статуса! Ведь тот же алкоголик может быть очень порядочным человеком просто попавшим в свое время в сложную ситуацию из которой не смог выйти сам! Yes Ведь в жизни ситуации всякие бывают, и вчерашний профессор может сесть на ту же травку после серьезного срыва или запить... Права имеют все наши граждане! Поэтому надо просто воспитывать людей, любить свою родину и противостоять всем нападкам со стороны!Особенно тех стран которые сами нарушают все права человека и лезут во все дыры со своим мнением! hi
    Меня только одно волнует... почему наши приняли этого Тефта? belay раз он именно прислан для того, чтобы начать цветные революции, то мы же можем (могли) от него отказаться! request Так почему не отказались? what или решили со спичками поиграть? fool
  64. 0
    22 August 2014 07: 21
    Необходимо тщательно тряхнуть еврейский кабинет министров Медведева!!!
    Это будущий оплот "болотников" и "канализационщиков"...
  65. -1
    22 August 2014 07: 41
    А вообще забавная ситуация, Теффт едет революцию устраивать и ВВП одобрил его кандидатуру, они что на пару работать будут?:-)
  66. +1
    22 August 2014 08: 36
    РФ не должна допустить переворота!Несанкционированные митинги надо давить без оглядки на кого бы там ни было!
  67. dmb
    0
    22 August 2014 09: 01
    "И академик и герой и мореплаватель и плотник",- если бы не знал, что Пушкин писал это про Петра Первого, могла появиться мысль, что великий поэт как баба Ванга предвидел рождение Старикова. У него можно насчитать с десяток профессий (писатель, экономист, политолог, историк, общественный деятель...). Ну прямо Леонардо да Винчи, а не Коля. Мне все же кажется что у всех упомянутых в статье профессия одна-проходимцы. Предвидя повизгивания почитателей, хотелось бы от них услышать, чего такого материального или интеллектуального произвели все эти бесчисленные директора загадочных институтов. Вообще их ответы автору производят впечатление плохо контролируемого бреда. Например один говорит, говорит про то, что в 1916 году близкие к другу Путина Якунину "эксперты" предрекают серьезные социальные потрясения и тут же безо всякой логики вещает про высокий Вовин рейтинг и невозможность посему раскачать лодку. Ежели же рейтинг высок, то откуда потрясения? А ежели же при высоком рейтинге Вова не в состоянии владеть ситуацией, то на хрена нам такой Вова. Второй "мореплаватель" почему-то считает выборы критическими точками. Да они будут критическими лишь в одном случае если власть, проигрывая их начнет фальсифицировать результаты, как это было в случае с предыдущими выборами в Думу. А на хрена нам такая власть?
  68. 0
    22 August 2014 09: 13
    Quote: Nick
    По этому в США выборы президента и не доверяют населению. Его выбирают доверенные выборщики.

    Я бы сказал еще что проверенные и мотивированные.
  69. 0
    22 August 2014 09: 18
    То есть они считают, и справедливо считают, что конкретно наш президент мешает осуществлению их планов.
    Они просчитались!Путин конечно им мешает,и мешает конкретно,но он воплощает чаяния большинства Русского народа,которые заключаются в желании иметь сильное,процветающее государство,с национально ориентированной политикой.Хочу этим сказать то,что народ который сильный духом,да ещё и понимающий что происходит,не сломить.Единственно,надо поработать над элитой.Но думаю,процесс по взращиванию национально ориентированной элиты,уже запущен.
  70. +2
    22 August 2014 09: 41
    Честно говоря , истерия в поддержку Путина надоела , средние внешнеполитические успехи никак не кореллируются с внутренней политикой, рост цен на ЖКХ и остальное , повышение пенсионнного возраста , никакая борьба с коррупцией, для народа я так думаю это важнее , нежели срач с западом
  71. 0
    22 August 2014 19: 19
    Quote: Normal
    Руководство России могло без объяснения причин не дать одобрения на назначение Джона Теффта послом США в России. Но несмотря на то, что "специализация" Теффта хорошо известна агреман был дан.Следовательно ВВП не только не считает оранжевую революцию в России возможной, но и сознательно идет на провоцирование внесистемной оппозиции на активные действия для еще большего сплочения населения вокруг собственной персоны.


    Ерунда. Теффт пусть лучше здесь сидит, ибо известен как облупленный. Наблюдение за товарищем послом - не проблема.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"