European suicide
Multimillion-dollar migration from Asia and Africa to European countries calls into question the very survival of European nations in the quite foreseeable future. The problem is aggravated by the fact that extremely high birth rates in the families of Asian and African migrants coexist with the constantly declining birth rate among Europeans proper, the level of which no longer even allows them to reproduce the current population of European countries. Against this background, in European countries, over the past few decades completely affected by the cult of consumption and “life for pleasure”, such phenomena as the legalization of same-sex marriage or the Childe Fries - “free from children” are growing.
Naturally, the latter phenomena by no means contribute to an increase in the birth rate and, alas, are far from an isolated character. The number of both childe fries and homosexuals of both sexes in Europe is increasing exponentially, and more likely not due to some innate characteristics of people embarking on the path of same-sex love or childlessness, but rather because of targeted propaganda carried out by the media and government organizations, responsible for family, youth, educational policy.
Of course, that modern society has a greater degree of freedom in terms of choosing a model of family relations, tolerates unmarried, childless people and even the same homosexuals. However, tolerance must still have certain limits. One thing is not to interfere in the privacy of adult self-sufficient people who are themselves responsible for their life choices, and another thing is to allow such deviations as adoptions of children in homosexual families, official propaganda of homosexuality in the media, constant underlining the “normality” of homosexual relations.
The destruction of traditional values in European countries led to the gradual leveling of family values and family relations. Women no longer want to marry and give birth, men also do not strive for family relationships and more and more often look at the representatives not of the opposite, but of their own sex. The way of life of the sexes is unified and sex differences seem to be erased, since men and women work in the same jobs, even dress in approximately the same style. But at the same time, men and women are increasingly moving away from each other. The misanthropy, misogyny and delusions of hatred are widely spread, approved in numerous television programs, on countless sites and pages on social networks. Against this background, same-sex relationships are beginning to be perceived by many European men and women as more harmonious, acceptable to them and deprived of those obligations and tensions that take place in the traditional model of relationships. This myth is also actively supported and broadcast by the media and popular culture in general.
In modern Europe, and in Russia too, criminal punishment for homosexuality has long been abolished, which means complete freedom of personal choice for adults who have decided to take this path. Many people of art, culture, business, science, even politicians, openly declare their homosexual orientation, which has little effect on their popularity in society. That is, it would seem that there is no ground for ranting on the topic of persecution of homosexuals. But no - the complexes, developing against the background of low self-esteem compared to the majority, make themselves felt and homosexuals continue to consider themselves humiliated and insulted even in these "greenhouse" conditions. Gay parades are held in European cities, in schools - lessons of sex education and tolerance, in which children are hammered in that homosexuality is just as normal sexual orientation. Now in many countries, the adoption of children by homosexual couples is already authorized. What this means in reality - and this means creating a "Komsomol" and "pioneers" for homosexuals, constantly replenishing their communities at the expense of growing new homosexuals - it’s no secret that many children raised in homosexual "families" will adopt sexual patterns "Parents."
By the way, about the concept of "parents." In many European countries, this concept is no longer identical to the figures of the father and mother. Indeed, in homosexual families there can be no father and mother - there are only two partners of the same sex. And these partners, instead of recognizing childlessness as a natural consequence of their entry into the path of same-sex love, by the way condemned by most world religions, try to equalize themselves not only in legal rights, but also in the semantic field with the parents of traditional families. For this, a monstrous operation was invented to replace the concepts of “mother” and “father” in legal documents with the concepts of “parent one” and “parent two”.
The hypocrisy of the situation is that a normal person should understand the consequences of his life choices. You chose the path of theft - recognize that the place is a prison for you (even hardened criminals understand and admit this). Chose the path of alcoholism - do not be surprised by a hangover, future health problems. The same is true in the case of homosexual relationships. Entering the path of same-sex relationships, you need to understand that childlessness is redemption for same-sex relationship. Children cannot be conceived in a same-sex couple. Only a bond between a man and a woman is capable of generating a new life. That is why in the Russian family code the family is defined as the union of a man and a woman, and not abstract “partners one and two, three, four”.
Thus, the very line on the adoption of children in same-sex couples and the substitution of the concepts of “father” and “mother” by certain “parents one and two” is flawed, going against the most common sense, not to mention the thousand-year tradition of family life.
No less important is the specificity of upbringing the younger generations in same-sex couples. First of all, in such couples, children are unlikely to be immune from sexual harassment. Opponents from among advocates of homosexuality may argue - in traditional families, cases of violence against children by relatives are also frequent. But in same-sex couples, such cases will be much more numerous if the children are of the same sex as the “parents”.
An interesting nuance is the perception of children brought up in same-sex "couples" in the surrounding society. Fortunately, heterosexuals are even more in a Europe with a blemish. And if not to talk about the elite stratum of society - show business, highly paid intelligentsia, in the basic social section of the population there is still a rather cool attitude towards same-sex unions. In particular, if we talk about the proletarian environment, about the social lows, where there are plenty of migrants from the same African and Asian countries. Thus, the legislative resolution of the adoption of children by same-sex couples is also a mine, laid under the personal safety of innocent boys and girls. If adult homosexuals chose their own path and were responsible for their behavior, then the children they adopt may face peer violence, a contemptuous attitude, get a lot of complexes and even go for suicide only because some adult homosexuals wanted to adopt or adopt , and the social protection authorities met gay couples. But adherents of same-sex love do not envisage this scenario - is this not one more evidence of their inherent selfishness and focus on satisfying their own whim?
In itself, the massification of homosexuality in modern Europe became possible only thanks to the massive propaganda used by the media, the scientific community, cultural and art workers, politicians, and businessmen. Modern European reality - the constant advertising of the gay community.
In most European cities, gay parades are regularly held, aimed in reality not at protecting the rights of gays who are not threatened in modern Europe, but at promoting “normality” of homosexuality as a sexual orientation. In fact, gay parades are advertisements for gay communities. Young Europeans are shown the world of same-sex relationships as a kind of kingdom of love and friendship, carefree joy and bright colors. When representatives of the LGBT community demand a gay parade in Moscow or St. Petersburg, this should be understood only as an attempt to spread the propaganda of homosexuality in the Russian social space.
In modern Europe, attitudes towards homosexuals have long been perhaps the key measure of "civilization." European politicians are trying to spread ideas about the legalization of homosexual marriages to the semi-colonial states under their control, primarily non-Muslim Africa. The Islamic world remains one of the few bastions that resist the assertion of the normality of homosexuality, and so far Europe has to reckon with it. At least with the oil monarchies of the Persian Gulf, which, with their medieval feudal order, remain reliable allies of the United States of America. Speaking of the United States. This country, playing a crucial role in the promotion of consumer values and lifestyles, as well as ranting about “human rights” and “democracy”, imposes the same rules around the world that it does not seek to observe itself. Thus, in the United States in many states the death penalty is in force, homosexual marriages are prohibited, but at the same time, at the level of international relations, the American leadership also supports the rights of sexual minorities and the abolition of the death penalty. It turns out that the American government wishes to other countries what it seeks to prevent in its own country. American society is generally quite conservative in comparison with European ones; in domestic politics, American leaders continue to maintain at least some common sense, unlike European governments, which have completely surrendered to the values of “tolerance”.
Meanwhile, the propaganda of same-sex relations by the American and European media turns out to be aimed primarily at the younger generations. First of all, this is clearly manifested in the same Russia, in the countries of Latin America or Asia. It is precisely the Russian youth who are most susceptible to the promotion of consumer values and moral “degradation”. The increase in the number of homosexuals and lesbians among young people is a natural consequence of targeted propaganda. Before the collapse of the USSR, the same lesbianism was a very uncommon phenomenon. Former ziechki, prostitutes, bohemians, a very limited circle of really born such women. In post-Soviet Russia, the situation has changed beyond recognition. Popularization of lesbianism through mass culture led to the emergence in almost every Russian city of lesbian parties, especially teenagers in terms of composition, which are aimed at involving absolutely normal girls in this environment, who without propaganda might not even suspect their imaginary lesbianism ".
The result of this massive propaganda is the diversion of a significant number of young people and adolescents from assimilating the normal models of sexual relations, which should orient them towards the creation of a traditional child family in the future. The young people who have gone through the school of homosexuality, even if they are “clever” over the years, remain psychologically devastated, needing the help of psychologists. Most of them are not able to return to normal relations, since they simply lack the relevant experience of building heterosexual relationships - from early youth they assimilated only the model of same-sex love.
In the political space of modern Europe, right and left are mixed today. Traditional right-wing radicals like the French National Front are increasingly becoming the natural defenders of the normal "left-wing" values of social justice, the right to work, family, motherhood and childhood.
Socialists and Social Democrats, not to mention all sorts of left-wing Trotskyists and anarchists, are becoming companions of neoliberal European and American elites, who propagandize the values of “human rights”, same-sex love, tolerant attitude to all sorts of social deviations, support floods of their countries by migrants.
- the touching bond of socialists and the LGBT community
So, in France in 2013, it was the socialists who pushed the law on legalization of homosexual marriages and their adoption of children, spitting on the opinion of at least half of the French population, once authoritative in the country of the Catholic Church, many political parties and public organizations. Therefore, the execution of the youth camp of the Norwegian socialists by Andreas Breivik has a certain amount of guilt of all European socialist parties, one way or another connected with the growth of a number of negative phenomena - floods of European countries by migrants, the spread of homosexuality, legalization of same-sex marriages and their adoption of children.
On the other hand, the legalization of same-sex marriage and the mass distribution of homosexuality in European society and in the world as a whole, becomes profitable, first of all, to corporations controlling the corresponding market of services for homosexuals. Today, serving the growing needs of homosexuals brings billions of dollars in profits to corporations, and it’s natural that, like any product, these corporations will advertise their services, also focusing on expanding the market and promoting goods, opening new markets that are still unexplored. huge profits due to the spread of same-sex relationships.
Interestingly, “tolerastov”, as all sorts of agitators jokingly call for “minority rights”, which actually turn out to be “privileges,” both manage to support delusional ideas of adopting children by same-sex couples, and mass migration from Africa and Asia, and following migrants to their customs , even going against the lifestyle of the host society. The basis of this practice is the ideology of multiculturalism, which implies “pluralism of cultures”, the coexistence of many cultural models within one society. The absurdity of multiculturalism becomes obvious even with a superficial glance. Take at least the very possibility of the compatibility of the legalization of same-sex marriage with the adoption of children and mass migration from the traditional societies of African and Asian states. I wonder how the same Pakistanis or Somalis, Pashtuns or Kurds will perceive same-sex couples, and their children - children, brought up in similar pairs? After all, it is far from a secret that the majority of migrants do not intend to integrate culturally into European society and, accordingly, will hardly ever be tolerant of the same adherents of same-sex love.
Loyalty to the customs of migrants, contrary to the traditions of the country - the recipient of migration, generally entails such consequences as the spread of the practice of female circumcision, child marriage, "honor killings", slavery among migrants living in European countries. Very often, Europeans themselves become victims of crimes committed by migrants. Moreover, the latter act not because of some special evil-doing or initial orientation towards the commission of a crime, but because of completely different cultural traditions that do not allow them to adapt to a completely different culturally society.
For example, in Norway, up to 70% of rapes are committed by migrants - Pakistanis and Somalis. Moreover, the perpetrators of crimes themselves absolutely do not see their guilt, because they believe that women were not against sexual intercourse, as they looked accordingly in a short skirt, with flowing hair, and so on. In their justification of the behavior of minorities, advocates of tolerance reach the point of absurdity - in the same Norway, Professor Unni Vikan said that Norwegian women are to blame for being raped by visiting Asian and African migrants, because Norwegians do not want to adapt to the changed living conditions in multicultural society. Obviously, they should also wear a burqa, given the growing percentage of migrants from foreign cultures. Similar statements were repeatedly made by politicians, pundits, journalists of many other countries where multiculturalism has the actual status of a state ideology - first of all, Scandinavian. A paradoxical situation turns out - migrants are allowed to preserve and in every possible way cultivate and emphasize their national and religious identity, while the indigenous population is deprived of its own traditions, becoming a guinea pig for experiments that are monstrous in their content.
Same-sex marriage and the adoption of children in them - one of these experiments, uniquely aimed at reducing the European population. After all, quite recently only a limited part of Europeans could afford same-sex relationships - as a rule, these were people belonging to near-bohemian circles. Today, homosexuality has become a mass phenomenon and even fourteen-year-old adolescents declare themselves homosexuals, because of their age they still have little understanding in the field of sexual relations and sexual behavior. How is this possible? The answer is one - solely due to the relevant policies pursued by European governments and public organizations.
Even in the same adolescent environment, homosexuality begins to spread thanks to appropriate sex education lessons in schools, ongoing propaganda about the normality of homosexual relations, focusing in the press and on school lessons on the protection of the rights of “teenagers - homosexuals”. Moreover, in recent years, the propaganda of homosexuality begins to embrace the most innocent ages of children - up to the pupils of preschool institutions. Naturally, no homosexuality among kindergarteners or junior schoolchildren is out of the question - any attempt to explain to them that there is homosexuality and that it is the norm are the most disgusting forms of propaganda aimed at bringing up children by homosexuals, in the vast majority of cases despite them real nature.
The economic development of European countries during the twentieth century led to the fact that the family already began to lose their positions, since women got the opportunity to work, no longer depend on men economically. Urbanization has violated the traditions of the family as an economic unit of society. It would seem, on the contrary, in such a social situation it is necessary to develop and implement policies aimed at strengthening the family, at cultivating family values among the younger generations of Europeans. However, we see nothing of the kind. Against this background, the propaganda of homosexuality instead of the propaganda of family relations and childbirth really looks like a “time bomb” laid down for European societies. The question arises - who and for what?
Today, at the forefront of the notorious “European values” is laid individualism, human rights as individuals. Of course, this is important, but not so much as to squeeze out the rights of society and overshadow public interests. Man is a social being, and while living in society, he must correlate his interests with the interests of society as a whole. This implies, among other things, concern for procreation, for obtaining a profession useful to society, for self-realization by bringing benefits to society. In pre-revolutionary Russia, then — it was collectivist values that prevailed in the Soviet state. The interests of society and the state were considered as priorities, and their service seemed to be the highest value and worthy way for each person, whether it be a peasant commune or a nobleman - an officer of the Russian army, a Soviet worker or a military man. It is this collectivist orientation of the Russian and Soviet societies that explain the numerous military, labor feats, scientific and cultural innovations that took place in stories our country.
In modern Europe, the public is replaced by the individual. But in reality, this substitution turns against individuality as such. A person who does not leave behind any cultural or political heritage, or just physical descendants, disappears completely. If the person who continued the race is remembered by at least the grandchildren, or even the great-grandchildren and great-great-grandchildren, then Childe Fries dooms himself to extinction. Especially considering the fact that the overwhelming majority of representatives of the Childe free communities, adherents of same-sex love and other similar deviations, are by their nature not creators, but consumers - and therefore they create genuine spiritual values, not to mention military exploits or political deeds are practically excluded. That is, this path of childlessness, the absence of offspring turns into a way of death, and death, deprived of heroism, death, condemning leaving to dust, to obscurity.
The assertion of same-sex relationships inevitably leads to the crisis of self-identification of a person who is experiencing more and more problems in understanding the surrounding reality, primarily in the area of building personal, sexual and family relationships. Sex roles in the modern world are transformed and mixed. Many people in modern Europe are no longer able to answer the question of what is your gender. In homosexual couples, adopted children are unlikely to be able to answer the question of what gender your parents are, respectively, and they themselves will also experience problems with gender identification. It turns out that the genetic connection between generations is gradually disappearing - homosexual unions do not have consanguinity and, accordingly, the fundamental roles of the father, mother, grandfather, grandmother, brother, sister, son, daughter, uncle, aunt, nephew and other relatives disappear. The society is being atomized and the person turns into “living for himself”, that is - into consuming and “smoking the sky”, devoid of any cultural soil.
The individual values of “life for oneself” are perfectly combined with consumerism and, therefore, benefit global corporations that control the production of countless consumer goods. On the other hand, it is obvious that the cultivation of homosexual relations, the flood of European countries by migrants from alien sociocultural and ethno-confessional states of Asia and Africa are the essence of a single order, part of some diabolical plan unknown to us to exterminate the European population and destroy European culture itself.
Once the Roman Empire disappeared, with its decaying indigenous population and the barbarians flooding Rome. This situation is reproduced in modern Europe. Danes and Swedes, the Dutch and the French march in gay parades in “fighting roosters” dresses, while Algerians and Senegalese, Turks and Kurds, Pakistanis and Indians occupy positions in the armed forces, police, security agencies, put under control all small business, first of all in the strategically important areas of food supply, transportation of the population. While maintaining the existing order of things, and it is unlikely to be changed, the social space of modern Europe is waiting for the inevitable transformation beyond recognition. After some time, there will be a mixture of nations and adverbs that have lost their own cultures and have not created new ones, but working people and are consuming the glory of world capital.
The international oligarchs, whose god is the Golden Taurus, and their nationality are bank accounts, have long harbored thoughts about minimizing the European population, most of which is expensive and can be replaced by cheap and easily manipulated immigrants from third world countries. Moreover, in Asia and Africa population growth continues and there will be no shortage of labor resources.
Before our eyes, Europe is committing suicide and, moreover, is trying to engage the entire core world in this suicidal process. But suicide in this case has obvious instigators - first of all, that same global financial elite, acting through politicians under its control, scientists, entrepreneurs, showmen, and the United States, which is a reliable tool in its hands. In any case, the values that most European countries are currently oriented at and which, as yet, in our eyes look at least deviant, can in no way be spread in Russia. The process of their planting, which began as early as the end of the 1980-s, and was carried out until recently without any obstacles, should be stopped. At present, certain steps have already been taken towards preventing planting on the Russian land of alien “cultural” values. However, any coming to power in the country of liberal forces oriented toward the West and hating the traditional Russian principle will also mean the inevitable beginning of undermining the sociocultural foundations of Russian society.
Naturally, the latter phenomena by no means contribute to an increase in the birth rate and, alas, are far from an isolated character. The number of both childe fries and homosexuals of both sexes in Europe is increasing exponentially, and more likely not due to some innate characteristics of people embarking on the path of same-sex love or childlessness, but rather because of targeted propaganda carried out by the media and government organizations, responsible for family, youth, educational policy.
Of course, that modern society has a greater degree of freedom in terms of choosing a model of family relations, tolerates unmarried, childless people and even the same homosexuals. However, tolerance must still have certain limits. One thing is not to interfere in the privacy of adult self-sufficient people who are themselves responsible for their life choices, and another thing is to allow such deviations as adoptions of children in homosexual families, official propaganda of homosexuality in the media, constant underlining the “normality” of homosexual relations.
The destruction of traditional values in European countries led to the gradual leveling of family values and family relations. Women no longer want to marry and give birth, men also do not strive for family relationships and more and more often look at the representatives not of the opposite, but of their own sex. The way of life of the sexes is unified and sex differences seem to be erased, since men and women work in the same jobs, even dress in approximately the same style. But at the same time, men and women are increasingly moving away from each other. The misanthropy, misogyny and delusions of hatred are widely spread, approved in numerous television programs, on countless sites and pages on social networks. Against this background, same-sex relationships are beginning to be perceived by many European men and women as more harmonious, acceptable to them and deprived of those obligations and tensions that take place in the traditional model of relationships. This myth is also actively supported and broadcast by the media and popular culture in general.
In modern Europe, and in Russia too, criminal punishment for homosexuality has long been abolished, which means complete freedom of personal choice for adults who have decided to take this path. Many people of art, culture, business, science, even politicians, openly declare their homosexual orientation, which has little effect on their popularity in society. That is, it would seem that there is no ground for ranting on the topic of persecution of homosexuals. But no - the complexes, developing against the background of low self-esteem compared to the majority, make themselves felt and homosexuals continue to consider themselves humiliated and insulted even in these "greenhouse" conditions. Gay parades are held in European cities, in schools - lessons of sex education and tolerance, in which children are hammered in that homosexuality is just as normal sexual orientation. Now in many countries, the adoption of children by homosexual couples is already authorized. What this means in reality - and this means creating a "Komsomol" and "pioneers" for homosexuals, constantly replenishing their communities at the expense of growing new homosexuals - it’s no secret that many children raised in homosexual "families" will adopt sexual patterns "Parents."
By the way, about the concept of "parents." In many European countries, this concept is no longer identical to the figures of the father and mother. Indeed, in homosexual families there can be no father and mother - there are only two partners of the same sex. And these partners, instead of recognizing childlessness as a natural consequence of their entry into the path of same-sex love, by the way condemned by most world religions, try to equalize themselves not only in legal rights, but also in the semantic field with the parents of traditional families. For this, a monstrous operation was invented to replace the concepts of “mother” and “father” in legal documents with the concepts of “parent one” and “parent two”.
The hypocrisy of the situation is that a normal person should understand the consequences of his life choices. You chose the path of theft - recognize that the place is a prison for you (even hardened criminals understand and admit this). Chose the path of alcoholism - do not be surprised by a hangover, future health problems. The same is true in the case of homosexual relationships. Entering the path of same-sex relationships, you need to understand that childlessness is redemption for same-sex relationship. Children cannot be conceived in a same-sex couple. Only a bond between a man and a woman is capable of generating a new life. That is why in the Russian family code the family is defined as the union of a man and a woman, and not abstract “partners one and two, three, four”.
Thus, the very line on the adoption of children in same-sex couples and the substitution of the concepts of “father” and “mother” by certain “parents one and two” is flawed, going against the most common sense, not to mention the thousand-year tradition of family life.
No less important is the specificity of upbringing the younger generations in same-sex couples. First of all, in such couples, children are unlikely to be immune from sexual harassment. Opponents from among advocates of homosexuality may argue - in traditional families, cases of violence against children by relatives are also frequent. But in same-sex couples, such cases will be much more numerous if the children are of the same sex as the “parents”.
An interesting nuance is the perception of children brought up in same-sex "couples" in the surrounding society. Fortunately, heterosexuals are even more in a Europe with a blemish. And if not to talk about the elite stratum of society - show business, highly paid intelligentsia, in the basic social section of the population there is still a rather cool attitude towards same-sex unions. In particular, if we talk about the proletarian environment, about the social lows, where there are plenty of migrants from the same African and Asian countries. Thus, the legislative resolution of the adoption of children by same-sex couples is also a mine, laid under the personal safety of innocent boys and girls. If adult homosexuals chose their own path and were responsible for their behavior, then the children they adopt may face peer violence, a contemptuous attitude, get a lot of complexes and even go for suicide only because some adult homosexuals wanted to adopt or adopt , and the social protection authorities met gay couples. But adherents of same-sex love do not envisage this scenario - is this not one more evidence of their inherent selfishness and focus on satisfying their own whim?
In itself, the massification of homosexuality in modern Europe became possible only thanks to the massive propaganda used by the media, the scientific community, cultural and art workers, politicians, and businessmen. Modern European reality - the constant advertising of the gay community.
In most European cities, gay parades are regularly held, aimed in reality not at protecting the rights of gays who are not threatened in modern Europe, but at promoting “normality” of homosexuality as a sexual orientation. In fact, gay parades are advertisements for gay communities. Young Europeans are shown the world of same-sex relationships as a kind of kingdom of love and friendship, carefree joy and bright colors. When representatives of the LGBT community demand a gay parade in Moscow or St. Petersburg, this should be understood only as an attempt to spread the propaganda of homosexuality in the Russian social space.
In modern Europe, attitudes towards homosexuals have long been perhaps the key measure of "civilization." European politicians are trying to spread ideas about the legalization of homosexual marriages to the semi-colonial states under their control, primarily non-Muslim Africa. The Islamic world remains one of the few bastions that resist the assertion of the normality of homosexuality, and so far Europe has to reckon with it. At least with the oil monarchies of the Persian Gulf, which, with their medieval feudal order, remain reliable allies of the United States of America. Speaking of the United States. This country, playing a crucial role in the promotion of consumer values and lifestyles, as well as ranting about “human rights” and “democracy”, imposes the same rules around the world that it does not seek to observe itself. Thus, in the United States in many states the death penalty is in force, homosexual marriages are prohibited, but at the same time, at the level of international relations, the American leadership also supports the rights of sexual minorities and the abolition of the death penalty. It turns out that the American government wishes to other countries what it seeks to prevent in its own country. American society is generally quite conservative in comparison with European ones; in domestic politics, American leaders continue to maintain at least some common sense, unlike European governments, which have completely surrendered to the values of “tolerance”.
Meanwhile, the propaganda of same-sex relations by the American and European media turns out to be aimed primarily at the younger generations. First of all, this is clearly manifested in the same Russia, in the countries of Latin America or Asia. It is precisely the Russian youth who are most susceptible to the promotion of consumer values and moral “degradation”. The increase in the number of homosexuals and lesbians among young people is a natural consequence of targeted propaganda. Before the collapse of the USSR, the same lesbianism was a very uncommon phenomenon. Former ziechki, prostitutes, bohemians, a very limited circle of really born such women. In post-Soviet Russia, the situation has changed beyond recognition. Popularization of lesbianism through mass culture led to the emergence in almost every Russian city of lesbian parties, especially teenagers in terms of composition, which are aimed at involving absolutely normal girls in this environment, who without propaganda might not even suspect their imaginary lesbianism ".
The result of this massive propaganda is the diversion of a significant number of young people and adolescents from assimilating the normal models of sexual relations, which should orient them towards the creation of a traditional child family in the future. The young people who have gone through the school of homosexuality, even if they are “clever” over the years, remain psychologically devastated, needing the help of psychologists. Most of them are not able to return to normal relations, since they simply lack the relevant experience of building heterosexual relationships - from early youth they assimilated only the model of same-sex love.
In the political space of modern Europe, right and left are mixed today. Traditional right-wing radicals like the French National Front are increasingly becoming the natural defenders of the normal "left-wing" values of social justice, the right to work, family, motherhood and childhood.
Socialists and Social Democrats, not to mention all sorts of left-wing Trotskyists and anarchists, are becoming companions of neoliberal European and American elites, who propagandize the values of “human rights”, same-sex love, tolerant attitude to all sorts of social deviations, support floods of their countries by migrants.
So, in France in 2013, it was the socialists who pushed the law on legalization of homosexual marriages and their adoption of children, spitting on the opinion of at least half of the French population, once authoritative in the country of the Catholic Church, many political parties and public organizations. Therefore, the execution of the youth camp of the Norwegian socialists by Andreas Breivik has a certain amount of guilt of all European socialist parties, one way or another connected with the growth of a number of negative phenomena - floods of European countries by migrants, the spread of homosexuality, legalization of same-sex marriages and their adoption of children.
On the other hand, the legalization of same-sex marriage and the mass distribution of homosexuality in European society and in the world as a whole, becomes profitable, first of all, to corporations controlling the corresponding market of services for homosexuals. Today, serving the growing needs of homosexuals brings billions of dollars in profits to corporations, and it’s natural that, like any product, these corporations will advertise their services, also focusing on expanding the market and promoting goods, opening new markets that are still unexplored. huge profits due to the spread of same-sex relationships.
Interestingly, “tolerastov”, as all sorts of agitators jokingly call for “minority rights”, which actually turn out to be “privileges,” both manage to support delusional ideas of adopting children by same-sex couples, and mass migration from Africa and Asia, and following migrants to their customs , even going against the lifestyle of the host society. The basis of this practice is the ideology of multiculturalism, which implies “pluralism of cultures”, the coexistence of many cultural models within one society. The absurdity of multiculturalism becomes obvious even with a superficial glance. Take at least the very possibility of the compatibility of the legalization of same-sex marriage with the adoption of children and mass migration from the traditional societies of African and Asian states. I wonder how the same Pakistanis or Somalis, Pashtuns or Kurds will perceive same-sex couples, and their children - children, brought up in similar pairs? After all, it is far from a secret that the majority of migrants do not intend to integrate culturally into European society and, accordingly, will hardly ever be tolerant of the same adherents of same-sex love.
Loyalty to the customs of migrants, contrary to the traditions of the country - the recipient of migration, generally entails such consequences as the spread of the practice of female circumcision, child marriage, "honor killings", slavery among migrants living in European countries. Very often, Europeans themselves become victims of crimes committed by migrants. Moreover, the latter act not because of some special evil-doing or initial orientation towards the commission of a crime, but because of completely different cultural traditions that do not allow them to adapt to a completely different culturally society.
For example, in Norway, up to 70% of rapes are committed by migrants - Pakistanis and Somalis. Moreover, the perpetrators of crimes themselves absolutely do not see their guilt, because they believe that women were not against sexual intercourse, as they looked accordingly in a short skirt, with flowing hair, and so on. In their justification of the behavior of minorities, advocates of tolerance reach the point of absurdity - in the same Norway, Professor Unni Vikan said that Norwegian women are to blame for being raped by visiting Asian and African migrants, because Norwegians do not want to adapt to the changed living conditions in multicultural society. Obviously, they should also wear a burqa, given the growing percentage of migrants from foreign cultures. Similar statements were repeatedly made by politicians, pundits, journalists of many other countries where multiculturalism has the actual status of a state ideology - first of all, Scandinavian. A paradoxical situation turns out - migrants are allowed to preserve and in every possible way cultivate and emphasize their national and religious identity, while the indigenous population is deprived of its own traditions, becoming a guinea pig for experiments that are monstrous in their content.
Same-sex marriage and the adoption of children in them - one of these experiments, uniquely aimed at reducing the European population. After all, quite recently only a limited part of Europeans could afford same-sex relationships - as a rule, these were people belonging to near-bohemian circles. Today, homosexuality has become a mass phenomenon and even fourteen-year-old adolescents declare themselves homosexuals, because of their age they still have little understanding in the field of sexual relations and sexual behavior. How is this possible? The answer is one - solely due to the relevant policies pursued by European governments and public organizations.
Even in the same adolescent environment, homosexuality begins to spread thanks to appropriate sex education lessons in schools, ongoing propaganda about the normality of homosexual relations, focusing in the press and on school lessons on the protection of the rights of “teenagers - homosexuals”. Moreover, in recent years, the propaganda of homosexuality begins to embrace the most innocent ages of children - up to the pupils of preschool institutions. Naturally, no homosexuality among kindergarteners or junior schoolchildren is out of the question - any attempt to explain to them that there is homosexuality and that it is the norm are the most disgusting forms of propaganda aimed at bringing up children by homosexuals, in the vast majority of cases despite them real nature.
The economic development of European countries during the twentieth century led to the fact that the family already began to lose their positions, since women got the opportunity to work, no longer depend on men economically. Urbanization has violated the traditions of the family as an economic unit of society. It would seem, on the contrary, in such a social situation it is necessary to develop and implement policies aimed at strengthening the family, at cultivating family values among the younger generations of Europeans. However, we see nothing of the kind. Against this background, the propaganda of homosexuality instead of the propaganda of family relations and childbirth really looks like a “time bomb” laid down for European societies. The question arises - who and for what?
Today, at the forefront of the notorious “European values” is laid individualism, human rights as individuals. Of course, this is important, but not so much as to squeeze out the rights of society and overshadow public interests. Man is a social being, and while living in society, he must correlate his interests with the interests of society as a whole. This implies, among other things, concern for procreation, for obtaining a profession useful to society, for self-realization by bringing benefits to society. In pre-revolutionary Russia, then — it was collectivist values that prevailed in the Soviet state. The interests of society and the state were considered as priorities, and their service seemed to be the highest value and worthy way for each person, whether it be a peasant commune or a nobleman - an officer of the Russian army, a Soviet worker or a military man. It is this collectivist orientation of the Russian and Soviet societies that explain the numerous military, labor feats, scientific and cultural innovations that took place in stories our country.
In modern Europe, the public is replaced by the individual. But in reality, this substitution turns against individuality as such. A person who does not leave behind any cultural or political heritage, or just physical descendants, disappears completely. If the person who continued the race is remembered by at least the grandchildren, or even the great-grandchildren and great-great-grandchildren, then Childe Fries dooms himself to extinction. Especially considering the fact that the overwhelming majority of representatives of the Childe free communities, adherents of same-sex love and other similar deviations, are by their nature not creators, but consumers - and therefore they create genuine spiritual values, not to mention military exploits or political deeds are practically excluded. That is, this path of childlessness, the absence of offspring turns into a way of death, and death, deprived of heroism, death, condemning leaving to dust, to obscurity.
The assertion of same-sex relationships inevitably leads to the crisis of self-identification of a person who is experiencing more and more problems in understanding the surrounding reality, primarily in the area of building personal, sexual and family relationships. Sex roles in the modern world are transformed and mixed. Many people in modern Europe are no longer able to answer the question of what is your gender. In homosexual couples, adopted children are unlikely to be able to answer the question of what gender your parents are, respectively, and they themselves will also experience problems with gender identification. It turns out that the genetic connection between generations is gradually disappearing - homosexual unions do not have consanguinity and, accordingly, the fundamental roles of the father, mother, grandfather, grandmother, brother, sister, son, daughter, uncle, aunt, nephew and other relatives disappear. The society is being atomized and the person turns into “living for himself”, that is - into consuming and “smoking the sky”, devoid of any cultural soil.
The individual values of “life for oneself” are perfectly combined with consumerism and, therefore, benefit global corporations that control the production of countless consumer goods. On the other hand, it is obvious that the cultivation of homosexual relations, the flood of European countries by migrants from alien sociocultural and ethno-confessional states of Asia and Africa are the essence of a single order, part of some diabolical plan unknown to us to exterminate the European population and destroy European culture itself.
Once the Roman Empire disappeared, with its decaying indigenous population and the barbarians flooding Rome. This situation is reproduced in modern Europe. Danes and Swedes, the Dutch and the French march in gay parades in “fighting roosters” dresses, while Algerians and Senegalese, Turks and Kurds, Pakistanis and Indians occupy positions in the armed forces, police, security agencies, put under control all small business, first of all in the strategically important areas of food supply, transportation of the population. While maintaining the existing order of things, and it is unlikely to be changed, the social space of modern Europe is waiting for the inevitable transformation beyond recognition. After some time, there will be a mixture of nations and adverbs that have lost their own cultures and have not created new ones, but working people and are consuming the glory of world capital.
The international oligarchs, whose god is the Golden Taurus, and their nationality are bank accounts, have long harbored thoughts about minimizing the European population, most of which is expensive and can be replaced by cheap and easily manipulated immigrants from third world countries. Moreover, in Asia and Africa population growth continues and there will be no shortage of labor resources.
Before our eyes, Europe is committing suicide and, moreover, is trying to engage the entire core world in this suicidal process. But suicide in this case has obvious instigators - first of all, that same global financial elite, acting through politicians under its control, scientists, entrepreneurs, showmen, and the United States, which is a reliable tool in its hands. In any case, the values that most European countries are currently oriented at and which, as yet, in our eyes look at least deviant, can in no way be spread in Russia. The process of their planting, which began as early as the end of the 1980-s, and was carried out until recently without any obstacles, should be stopped. At present, certain steps have already been taken towards preventing planting on the Russian land of alien “cultural” values. However, any coming to power in the country of liberal forces oriented toward the West and hating the traditional Russian principle will also mean the inevitable beginning of undermining the sociocultural foundations of Russian society.
Information