Military Review

The South African Army is training immediate reaction forces. A variant of the African "NATO"?

28
The South African army commander, Lieutenant-General V.R. Masondo, confirmed that preparations were under way for the solution of military tasks for the deployment of special contingent. These tasks can be set within the African Center for Immediate Crisis Response (ACIRC).

South Africa has taken the lead in promoting the creation of ACIRC with the goal of engaging a number of African countries in crisis management until the establishment of the African Reserve Force (ASF). By this initiative is meant the creation by South Africa of a special combat rapid response group - a group capable of becoming the core of a peculiar analogue of the African "NATO".

The South African Army is training immediate reaction forces. A variant of the African "NATO"?


Lieutenant General Masondo confirmed that the armed forces are moving towards achieving this goal, and are also going to participate in the specialized military exercises “Seboka”, which will be held this year and will be sent to prepare the army for a new mission.

As stated by Masondo, the main intention is to train a combat group, the basis of which will be a battalion of motorized infantry infantry with the support of armored vehicles, artillery, air defense forces, as well as engineering elements. A group of medics from the Military Medical Service of South Africa will also be at their disposal.

The commander of joint operations, Lieutenant General Derrick Maguby, tentatively stated that after experience in Central African Republic in March, 2013 South Africa would not bring troops into the foreign countries without air support. The ACIRC combat group, at the same time, may be equipped with at least a small number of Denel FH-2 Rooivalk (“Kestrel”) combat helicopters and Oryx medium transport helicopters.

COMMENTARY

The difficulty for the army lies not so much in organizing a combat rapid response group, as in organizing a mission that requires the deployment of impressive forces. The armed forces of South Africa are already too dispersed, and therefore the South African command will have to work actively to use them in the framework of the new mission.

The army was able to deploy the forces of two battalions outside South Africa and 13-ti infantry units at the border only through the use of reserve troops, which currently provide support to seven border factions.

But when attacking by three battalions, supporting the troops will be difficult, not to mention the inclusion of armored vehicles, artillery and air defense forces in the process.
Another major obstacle lies outside the competence of the army commander: lack of transport units aviation. Currently, the South African Air Force (SAAF) has no more than four operational C-130s, air transport is not in reserve, and the Navy does not have the necessary facilities in principle. The risks of using self-employed aircraft with civilian companies have been clearly demonstrated in the Central African Republic, but while funding for the purchase of heavy transport ships and aircraft of the South African Air Force is clearly not enough.

This is quite a serious obstacle, because the required number of armored vehicles, Carakal armored vehicles (Rooikat) or Ratel-90 will not fit in the C-130 or even in the rented IL-76. The artillery situation is only marginally better: the G5 towing howitzer is transportable, but neither the heavy cannon tractor, nor the Bateleur MLRS will fit the C-130 in the right amount. Military engineers have the same difficulties with their equipment, and medical personnel - with their container systems.

Given that I at ACIRIC means “immediate”, it’s hard to imagine how even with an incredible effort being put into the armed forces, South Africa will be able to fulfill its obligations in the near and slightly more distant future. Worse, there is some misunderstanding with the strategic leadership of the SAAF on the need to use heavy (long-range) transport aircraft instead of medium, and this despite the urgency of the problem. The fact that these problems will not be solved in the near future will mean that the army will face a long-term crisis of air transport shortages as a result of the wrong choice of acquired aircraft.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.janes.com/article/41966/south-african-army-preparing-immediate-response-force
28 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Crang
    Crang 19 August 2014 09: 32
    +2
    Cool tank in the photo.
    1. zeleznijdorojnik
      zeleznijdorojnik 19 August 2014 10: 12
      -3
      Chasing blacks from palm trees, and even those tribes that have not yet acquired RPG-7 Chinese.
      1. strannik1985
        strannik1985 19 August 2014 10: 55
        +6
        When the South Africans had such cars, the Negro RPG in bulk was, like everything else, including military advisers, while from 90-mm guns Ratelom (1200 meters) managed to knock out tanks.
      2. Blackgrifon
        Blackgrifon 19 August 2014 21: 30
        0
        Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
        Chasing blacks from palm trees, and even those tribes that have not yet acquired RPG-7 Chinese.


        I disagree - the BBM was developed following the results of generalizing combat experience as a new heavy armored car and taking into account that its enemy would be T-54/55/62. The customer and the designer did not expect a meeting with the T-72 of the latest version, the T-80 or T-90 with the Abrams and the Leopard, but considering that at a distance of up to 2000 meters, 76 mm "main caliber" penetrates the armor of T-55 and T- 62 (according to information from open sources), then we can assume that the modification with 105 mm is quite dangerous (by the way, I still can't find who bought 28 105 Ruikats, if anyone found it, please unsubscribe). The tactical niche in the South African Armed Forces for this AFV is reconnaissance and raids. The armor is slightly weaker than our BMP-3 / BMD-4 (holds a 23 mm shot from the Shilka in the forehead). So, this is not that thin-sided trough proudly called a centaur.
    2. Lone gunman
      Lone gunman 19 August 2014 14: 53
      0
      Yes ... this car would not look bad in my garage. Yes
      1. Crang
        Crang 19 August 2014 14: 59
        0
        If I were offered to choose and take 10 dream tanks to my garage, then this Ruikat vehicle would take a firm place in my top ten tanks along with: T-10M, KV-1S-122, T-55, IS -3M, T-72, T-72B, T-90A and others.
    3. Blackgrifon
      Blackgrifon 19 August 2014 21: 16
      0
      Quote: Krang
      Cool tank in the photo.

      By the way, this BBM is one of two worthy examples of the development of wheeled BBMs. South Africa had extensive experience in this area and created a good car, dangerous for all tanks in its theater, which, coupled with high mobility and good security makes it more than a worthy opponent. The only thing I can’t understand is why they didn’t put an automatic charging device - is it still hard to equip shells at speed in the bush with handles? Would you like the crew to stand up for themselves confidently in case of failure?
  2. zeleznijdorojnik
    zeleznijdorojnik 19 August 2014 10: 14
    +4
    But seriously, the South African men had a terrific army in the 70s - the most powerful not only on the continent, but in the top ten of the world ranking - the actions of their special forces were included in the mass of textbooks ... And when the apartheid regime was curtailed - that’s all - the army was blown away.
    1. strannik1985
      strannik1985 19 August 2014 10: 47
      +4
      Given the nuances of blacks coming to power — the enemy disappeared — they reduced the funding of the army, started playing games with national quotas, etc. — the army was blown away.
      1. zeleznijdorojnik
        zeleznijdorojnik 19 August 2014 13: 09
        +1
        Well, I would not say that the enemy disappeared - there was a terrible mess in intra-African relations, if only a little bit - and tribal wars would trample on.
        1. strannik1985
          strannik1985 21 August 2014 06: 38
          0
          And for a war of this type, a classical army is not needed, these are the tasks of the police and the explosives (or, what they replace insiders).
  3. Crang
    Crang 19 August 2014 10: 43
    +4
    Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
    Chasing blacks from palm trees, and even those tribes that have not yet acquired RPG-7 Chinese.

    This thing has the highest mobility, resource and autonomy. And at the same time it copes without any problems with tanks of the T-54/55, T-62, "Centurion" and M48 / 60 types.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 19 August 2014 11: 47
      +2
      Quote: Krang
      This thing has the highest mobility.

      In the conditions of your theater
      1. strannik1985
        strannik1985 19 August 2014 12: 28
        +1
        Centauro. Italy. A mountain theater is mountainous, but a road network is developed, the same can be said about the whole of Europe.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 19 August 2014 15: 01
          0
          And they fought a lot there? But when their miracle machines ended up in 2006 in the village of Nasiriya, epicafile insidious rebels managed to stop this miracle of technology through ordinary barricades
          1. k_ply
            k_ply 19 August 2014 18: 11
            +2
            Are these barricades capable of holding 105-mm ammunition, or is it still a matter of limiting the use of heavy weapons, especially in residential areas teeming with civilians? And why is the Italians, or the Spaniards climb on the rampage in Iraq?
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 19 August 2014 20: 05
              0
              Quote: k_ply
              or is it all about limiting the use of heavy weapons

              Rather, it is in common sense. In the event of firing, the streets would become completely impassable, because debris and building funnels would be added to the barricades
              1. k_ply
                k_ply 19 August 2014 23: 30
                +2
                Generally not necessary. I doubt the Centaur's targeting system does not allow for an accurate shot to form a passage. The vehicle is not for a breakthrough as an MBT (capable of turning on the spot, the Centaur is not), but for reconnaissance and support (similar to the AMX-10RC, 6x6), allowing itself to be lured into the trap of urban conditions. The DB is not in its style, ideal for actions on flat sparsely wooded areas with dry soils (desert, steppe, forest-steppe and the like), here its advantages are manifested - mobility and autonomy (speed and power reserve).
          2. strannik1985
            strannik1985 21 August 2014 07: 16
            0
            This, first of all, indicates that the Italians are unprepared for serious urban battles, even with more heavy equipment, sappers with explosives are used to destroy barricades, BATs or other army engineering equipment, mobilize civilian.
      2. cosmos111
        cosmos111 19 August 2014 17: 43
        +2
        Quote: Spade
        In the conditions of your theater

        But what about MRAP, which first used South African waxes in droves .....
        Nazis, only with tangible losses from IEDs in Iraq and Afghanistan, began to use massively MRAP in both Afghanistan and Iraq, which reduced losses from IEDs by several times .....
        in conditions of completely different theater of operations ......

        our troops ((((in the 80s, like the troops of South Africa in Angola))), at the same time they fought in Afghanistan, but no one MRAP did not use --- the result is heavy losses to Soviet armored vehicles from mines and IEDs ... ...

        thatt not, the theater of war matters, but the protection of soldiers and efficiency, the sun ...
        South Africa has 80- EVERYTHING IT WAS AT A HEIGHT !!!


        1. cosmos111
          cosmos111 19 August 2014 18: 05
          +1
          the use of artillery (((G-5, G-6))), at great distances .....

          The South African G-5 howitzer, caliber 155 mm, with a long range of up to 39 km, made it possible to hit a stationary target with a probability of 20% at a distance of 90 km !!!!
          and this is in the 80s !!!!

          PS: Samil-100 howitzer calculation machine, RESERVED AND WITH ANTI-MINING PROTECTION !!!

          клик
          1. cosmos111
            cosmos111 19 August 2014 18: 22
            0
            and even that valuable South Africa brought into military theory and practice ....
            this is the actions of the RDG, behind enemy lines ....

            in 1976 a detachment of special intelligence and sabotage forces was created, in the rear ---- RECCE ..... RECCE- "Reconnaissance Commando" ((((reconnaissance group)))))
            co-founder of RECCE was Jan Breitenbach ...

            in the 80s he commanded the famous 32nd Battalion, also known as "Buffalo" ....
        2. Lopatov
          Lopatov 19 August 2014 18: 10
          +1
          Quote: cosmos111
          what about MRAP

          And this is a thing from a completely different opera. By the way, they were not invented in South Africa, or even in Rhodesia. The first MRAP came from the French during the war in Algeria.
          1. cosmos111
            cosmos111 19 August 2014 19: 19
            0
            Quote: Spade
            the French during the war in Algeria.


            let's just say ... South Africa, together with South Rhodesians ...... "reinvented "(((walked with their own tut)))) from semi-artisanal: in the 1970s" Wolf ", on the chassis of" Unimog "," Bosvark "," Rodef 25 "," UR 416 ", etc. ...

            and applied
            Quote: cosmos111
            in droves ..
        3. strannik1985
          strannik1985 21 August 2014 07: 23
          0
          In Afghanistan, the mountainous terrain, equipment with a high center of gravity can easily roll over, the South Africans themselves said that their technique is effective on the plain.

          For Afghanistan, you know, don’t whistle, work on increasing the stability of equipment to demolition began almost immediately after entering.
  4. KAVTORANG -II
    KAVTORANG -II 19 August 2014 12: 59
    +3
    Quote: strannik1985
    When the South Africans had such cars, the Negro RPG in bulk was, like everything else, including military advisers, while from 90-mm guns Ratelom (1200 meters) managed to knock out tanks.

    Right. Only this is not "Ratel". This - BRM "Ruikat" - a more serious beast. The 76 mm cannon is an adapted version of the ship's Otto Melara Super Rapid. For the T-54/55/62 tanks, which fought there, its armor penetration was behind the eyes.
    There was a limited edition with the L-7 -105mm cannon. By the way, according to open sources, the "forehead" and the tower hold 23mm shells.
    In the ranks.
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 19 August 2014 20: 47
      +1
      Quote: KAUTORANG-II
      Only this is not "Ratel


      BRM "Eland" 4x4, armed with 90-mm 90L cannons from CMI Defense, during the battles in Angola successfully fought with the T-54/55, while the patency of the armored car itself and the armor protection was not sufficient ...

      it was decided to place a 90 mm cannon on the Ratel armored personnel carrier ...
      in an armored wheeled fire support vehicle "Ratel" FSV 90 combined the chassis of an armored personnel carrier and a three-man turret armed with a 90L mm cannon of the BRM "Eland" .....

      the initial velocity of the projectile of the 90-mm gun is 750 m / s, BK 29 are located in the turret, forty more - in the airborne compartment ...
      effective firing range of 1200 m ....
  5. wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 19 August 2014 13: 37
    -2
    South Africa’s woks will have to carry all the armor and artillery along the railway or on the steamboats, but this will already be the tortoise reaction force. laughing

    Buy our BMD-1,2 and BTR-D, gentlemen. laughing
    1. k_ply
      k_ply 19 August 2014 15: 19
      +2
      I’ll tell you a secret, when the United States pushes it to restore order on the African continent with the wrong hands (ground forces), they will provide transport aircraft of the Air Force Air Forces and Naval Forces ships. This practice at one time existed in relation to the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand allies in relation to the theater of war in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region and Southeast Asia.
  6. Crang
    Crang 19 August 2014 13: 51
    +2
    Quote: wanderer_032
    Buy our BMD-1,2 and BTR-D, gentlemen.

    BMD-1/2 and BTR-D I wonder how sad it is for me to say this.
  7. Kyrgyz
    Kyrgyz 19 August 2014 14: 56
    +1
    Who knows, maybe when Africa will cease to be a training ground for everyone to squeeze a little
    1. k_ply
      k_ply 19 August 2014 15: 36
      +1
      The problem is that Africa, on the other hand, is not interesting to anyone, and corporations only need to walk in denominations in front of the dictators' noses in order to take their own (natural resources), and "black solidarity" does not exist, for example, the USSR and Cuba in Angola had to properly "process" and rally them so as not to scatter.
  8. Nagaibak
    Nagaibak 19 August 2014 18: 12
    +2
    They don’t need to think about it. Without a white fighting army in South Africa there will be no. And South Africa itself can become bogged down in a civil war.