The problem of integration of Tajikistan into the Customs Union

53
In the integration of each post-Soviet republic in the Customs Union has its own specifics. Belarus, for example, wants trade without any restrictions, Kazakhstan protects its industry, isolated Armenia needs to be “connected” by rail to the Union. However, the most problematic will be the integration of the two Central Asian republics - Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. And if the Kyrgyz goods can still be reconciled with the Kyrgyz re-export, the problem is different in Tajikistan: the state and drug cartels have grown together like Siamese twins.

Holes in the border

Kyrgyzstan, as is known, has no common borders with Afghanistan, which in no way protects it from drug trafficking. The fact is that there is no common border between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan - the delimitation agreement is still at the negotiation stage. In addition, the future boundary passes through the mountainous terrain and control over it is very conditional.

The condition of the Tajik-Afghan border is no better: the number of holes in it is simply incredible, and the equipment of the Tajik border guards does not hold water.

However, even this is only half the problem: the merger of the state apparatus and law enforcement agencies with local drug cartels poses a greater danger.

Transit appendage of monocultural Afghanistan

According to a recently published report “Between cooperation and isolation: Afghanistan’s relations with the republics of Central Asia”, the only sector of the economy connecting the leadership of Tajikistan with Afghanistan is drug trafficking. It is noteworthy that the key player in the Tajik drug market is not the drug cartels, but the officials and law enforcement officials on both sides of the border.

In fact, without the proceeds of drug trafficking, Tajikistan will become an incompetent state and will be plunged first into the most severe intra-elite confrontation, which will then grow into a civil war.

It is noteworthy that the economic model of Tajikistan will soon completely exhaust itself. If the shadow economy in the republic rests on control over drug flows and collecting tribute from the remaining local enterprises, the official economic pillars are guest remittances, aluminum trade and cotton exports. And all of these branches of the Tajik "economy" have already begun to have significant problems.

Thus, the volume of aluminum production in the first half of the year was reduced by 47%, it is said that Emomali Rakhmon's family is fed from the only aluminum plant TALCO. Cotton production has also fallen and remittances from Russia to Tajikistan have declined.

However, the economy of Tajikistan is in a kind of homeostasis and it can be broken either by the mass return of guest workers from Russia, or by the beginning of the real work on Eurasian integration. The campaign of the Afghan Taliban to the North is unlikely: they have yet to face official Kabul. In addition, the guarantor of the territorial integrity of Tajikistan is the Russian 201-I base. The trouble is that integrating Tajikistan in its current state is impossible, and leaving it outside of integration processes threatens to randomize the republic and inevitably lead to the subsequent export of instability to neighboring states.

Destructive dilemma

It is almost pointless to carry out reforms in Tajikistan: they will be sabotaged by local elitist groups who have created joint drug enterprises with Afghanistan, and the funds allocated for reform will be inefficiently spent.

Solve the problem with "leaky borders" could return the Russian border guards to the Tajik-Afghan border. But the elites of Tajikistan will not agree to such a step. First, the easy drug profits corrupt: the elites of Tajikistan are possible and can earn on something else, but not the fact that they want. Secondly, the drying up of narcotic rivers will cause a sharp reduction in the food supply base of the Tajik elitarians, which will automatically lead to an aggravation of internal contradictions and the beginning of civil strife.

With this scenario, the first thing likely to break out is Gorny Badakhshan, which borders Afghanistan and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China. Dushanbe’s control over Badakhshan can be called highly conditional. Gorno-Badakhshan "authorities" (this is a common formula in the local media, and without quotation marks) are directly accused of smuggling, organizing drug trafficking, creating illegal armed groups. But Dushanbe has only one comment to them - the late return of bank loans. And this is not surprising: the central authorities do not have the forces to control this region, and attempts to strengthen the position of the government in autonomy by force will only lead to greater destabilization.

This area is also attractive for Americans trying to shake Central Asia. Kindle fire in Badakhshan is easy, as evidenced by the burning of the police department in the capital of autonomy - Khorog. Then instability can be transferred to the rest of Tajikistan, as well as to China, where interethnic contradictions between the Uighurs and the Hans are intensely heated.

Protect the neighbors

There is reason to think that in the near future Moscow will have to prepare for plunging Tajikistan into chaos, from which it is unlikely that the CSTO’s measures to strengthen the borders of the republic are unlikely to be protected. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on stimulating the prompt delimitation and demarcation of the Tajik-Kyrgyz border and equipping it with all the necessary controls. In addition, the preparation of a corps of crisis managers capable of resuscitating the chaotic republics would not be redundant. Soon they will be useful not only in Novorossia, but also in other parts of Eurasia, which our overseas “partners” will burn before our retreat before our retreat.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    19 August 2014 14: 17
    Do not take Tajikistan into the Customs Union. Extremely unstable region.
    1. +10
      19 August 2014 14: 26
      In all likelihood, the time has come to replace Rahmon with a more modern politician, gravitating to more constructive cooperation with Russia.
      1. +4
        19 August 2014 14: 37
        The first thing this modern politician has to do is to crush the drug trade. Well and the most important thing is to create normal working conditions in your country so that Tajiks do not go on guest workers to us.
        1. +6
          19 August 2014 15: 55
          Quote: Fagot
          The first thing this modern politician has to do is to crush the drug trade.

          yeah ... but what will he live on .. laughing !
      2. +2
        19 August 2014 16: 41
        I had to serve in Tajikistan for a long time, it very much resembles Tajikistan-Poland ........
    2. Leonidych
      +4
      19 August 2014 14: 29
      if desired, any region can be made stable and Russia will make stable both Tajikistan and Ukraine and any other, would be a desire
      1. +3
        19 August 2014 14: 38
        Quote: Leonidych
        any region can be made stable and Russia will be made stable by Tajikistan

        Can. But do we need it? And if necessary, to whom? So that the next oligarch would begin to deal with Tajik aluminum, and we would have a firebrand with the protection of their border?
        Isn’t it easier to protect the Kazakh jointly?
        1. Siberian
          +1
          19 August 2014 14: 51
          Quote: a52333
          Isn’t it easier to protect the Kazakh jointly?


          Kazakhs have a very long border, and Pyanj (Amu Darya) is a natural line of defense
          1. +1
            19 August 2014 16: 34
            What about the landscape? Mountains to guard or the steppe. Two big differences
            1. +1
              19 August 2014 16: 45
              The border in Nagorno-Badakhshan passes along the Pamir ridge
              1. 0
                19 August 2014 16: 52
                Landscape near the Kazakh border
                1. +1
                  19 August 2014 18: 42
                  The border of Tajikistan with Afghanistan passes not along the ridge but along the source of the Amu Darya. You can control it if you wish.
                  The photo shows the similarity of two roads in Kyrgyzstan on the border with Tajikistan. In one direction there are illegal deliveries of Russian fuel and lubricants preferential for Kyrgyzstan to Tajikistan and Afghanistan, in the other "Tajik-Afghan export".
        2. 0
          19 August 2014 19: 20


          ours, and so in 93 tried to defend why no one needed the border. And as always, the fighting spirit and the unbending nature of our fighters did not allow the militants to translate into reality their plans.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +6
        19 August 2014 16: 04
        Quote: Leonidych
        if desired, any region can be made stable and Russia will make stable both Tajikistan and Ukraine and any other, would be a desire

        How awful!
    3. +5
      19 August 2014 14: 40
      Hmm ... If it weren’t for 201 MSD, the Mujahideen had been in charge of Tajikistan for a long time !!! And do not suffer the illusion of the unfortunate people of Tajikistan !!! Republic in full OPE !!! I think who has been to this republic ... He will understand !!! Very ... Well, just very carefully you need to approach the inclusion of Tajikistan in the customs union !!!
      1. +5
        19 August 2014 14: 49
        And why did he just need to pull him into the vehicle again, someone wanted to feed at the expense of Russia, dropped the hump at 91 again, we pull on ourselves people in Asia a different mentality gentlemen
    4. +3
      19 August 2014 15: 04
      I agree. But you should not give it to the hands of the Monkey from across the ocean. And about China, too, do not forget. So here fell on both ends.
    5. +4
      19 August 2014 15: 04
      Quote: Fagot
      Do not accept Tajikistan into the Customs Union.

      And Tajikistan does not particularly ask, unlike Kyrgyzstan. Yes, and would ask - did not take. It is almost like considering Afghanistan as a promising member.
      There is only one prospect for this Basmachi world. The dismemberment and the establishment of strict military control over units from Russia and China. But this is in the future. Not yet up to him.
    6. 0
      19 August 2014 15: 15
      Quote: Fagot
      Do not take Tajikistan into the Customs Union. Extremely unstable region.

      Then he will be admitted to the "anti - Customs Union" of the United States. And who said that when the rats devour each other, the remaining pair is more difficult to finish off than before tens? In extreme cases, the "rat king" is tamed ... The main thing is not to let the rats reproduce again. Sanitation (deratization) is also necessary in Russia ... And Tajikistan was a part of it, by the way ...
  2. Alexandr 2
    +6
    19 August 2014 14: 22
    Tajikistan is a state incapable of independence.
    1. +5
      19 August 2014 14: 24
      The main thing here is not to put parasites on your neck.
      1. Leonidych
        +2
        19 August 2014 14: 30
        any parasite can be made a farmer
    2. -1
      19 August 2014 16: 51
      Tojikiston is not a state, it is a territory. Like Ukraine. With a big stretch, both them, and Kyrgyzstan, and some others, can be called holey under-states.
  3. +1
    19 August 2014 14: 24
    For the admission of Tajikistan to the Customs Union it will be necessary to create another military base - in Gorny Badakhshan (and not the fact that it will be less than the 201st base, just the opposite - much more). And after that we’ll have to carry out a showdown in the Chuy valley - so that the Kyrgyz do not slaughter the Uzbeks (or vice versa)
    1. Leonidych
      +1
      19 August 2014 14: 31
      the more bases the better, and you can restore order in a day
    2. Dardanec
      +10
      19 August 2014 14: 34
      The massacre you indicated occurred between the Uzbeks and the Kyrgyz in the Ferghana Valley. In the Chuy valley, everything is fine in this regard, I speak as a local resident.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +5
        19 August 2014 15: 26
        Quote: DARDANEC
        The massacre you indicated occurred between the Uzbeks and the Kyrgyz in the Ferghana Valley. In the Chuy valley, everything is fine in this regard, I speak as a local resident.


        Oh well him, do not try to replace him with a teacher. Victim of the exam with an outbreak of graphomania. Do not even minus, nonsense and so visible.
        By the way, be more orderly in Russia, so the Ferghana Valley could have half the Russia, decent tomatoes and figs from a tree without eating, feed fruits and vegetables.
      3. 0
        21 August 2014 10: 19
        I'm sorry - I screwed up, wrote, and I thought about mine (I’m talking about the Chuy valley instead of the Ferghana one).
  4. netwalker
    +8
    19 August 2014 14: 30
    If we accept Tajikistan into the Customs Union, then they will completely occupy Belarus and Russia with no control.
    1. +2
      19 August 2014 14: 34
      Quote: netwalker
      If we accept Tajikistan into the Customs Union, then they will completely occupy Belarus and Russia with no control.

      They are here and without the union of this doh..ya. There will be more, but among the reasons there will be a high birth rate and poverty.
    2. Siberian
      +4
      19 August 2014 14: 45
      Quote: netwalker
      If we accept Tajikistan into the Customs Union, then they will completely occupy Belarus and Russia with no control


      they won’t be able to, they’re only 5-6 million, if I’m not mistaken ... But the entry of Uzbekistan will become a nightmare for Russian people. Fortunately, Karimov distances himself from the Customs Union.
      1. +1
        19 August 2014 14: 59
        Quote: SIBERIAN
        they won’t be able to, they’re only 5-6 million, if I’m not mistaken ... But the entry of Uzbekistan will become a nightmare for Russian people. Fortunately, Karimov distances himself from the Customs Union.

        For all of them, the borders are closed purely formally, there will be no difference whatsoever. Moreover, due to restrictions as non-residents, they seek to receive a Russian passport. And so at least they need it will disappear. More precisely, some.
        1. Siberian
          +2
          19 August 2014 15: 06
          Quote: Belopolsky
          For all of them, the borders are closed purely formally, there will be no difference whatsoever. Moreover, due to restrictions as non-residents, they seek to receive a Russian passport. And so at least they need it will disappear. More precisely, some.


          Be that as it may, on the day the uzbekistan river enters the CU (or EurAsEC) in Moscow, the Great Nationalist Revolution will begin (the new Manezhnaya Maidan or something like that). Therefore, in matters of integration, you must be careful ....
          1. +1
            19 August 2014 19: 41
            Quote: SIBERIAN
            Be that as it may, on the day the uzbekistan river enters the CU (or EurAsEC) in Moscow, the Great Nationalist Revolution will begin (the new Manezhnaya Maidan or something like that). Therefore, in matters of integration, you must be careful ....

            IMHO, nothing of the kind will happen at this moment, and if it happens later, then whether they are in an alliance or not will be independent.
  5. +3
    19 August 2014 14: 37
    Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are ballast and hemorrhoids at the same time, is it worth stepping on this rake again, having already stepped once, these are pseudo-states that do not have sufficient real and independent income, i.e. it is enough to "drop" them, depriving them of external financial sources, and they will die by themselves .., therefore, you shouldn't touch them at all, let them "live" as they can, without making sharp gestures towards the West ...
    1. +1
      19 August 2014 15: 58
      Quote: Volka
      Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are ballast and hemorrhoids at the same time


      Have you personally seen how this "ballast and hemorrhoids" looks? And if not, then I advise you to look and compare, maybe something else after comparison will seem to be a proctologist's diagnosis request
    2. 0
      21 August 2014 10: 23
      Better to support "this ballast and hemorrhoids at the same time" than to fight in that area (just much cheaper).
  6. Dardanec
    +5
    19 August 2014 14: 44
    Quote: Volka
    Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are ballast and hemorrhoids at the same time, is it worth stepping on this rake again, having already stepped once, these are pseudo-states that do not have sufficient real and independent income, i.e. it is enough to "drop" them by depriving them of external financial sources and they will die by themselves ...

    Maybe it’s worth all the same to "drop", creating Afghan-like states in the zone of interests of the Russian Federation, and push these states to normal development through joining the Customs and Eurasian Unions, including industrial development. Moreover, Kirigizia is still part of the "Russian world", although the outlines of the Caliphate are already visible here ...
    1. -7
      19 August 2014 16: 31
      And they themselves are not able to develop normally?
      The question is rhetorical. Since the answer is no. Unable. Let China take them. This is not our land. And people are completely alien in mentality.
      1. +2
        20 August 2014 00: 09
        So China is not against it, it is already moving little by little in this direction so far economically. It invests in the economy, builds roads, but the land subsurface of countries is taken into account, in Kyrgyzstan they plan to build a railway from China, they really plan for many years, but what the hell is not joking, it gives loans. People are still close to Russia by mentality, while the post-Soviet space is still alive in 5-10 years, everything will be different.
  7. APS
    +1
    19 August 2014 14: 44
    You know the opinion that after joining the TS, Tajiks will all come to us mistakenly, and so who needs to come to us, it’s more likely not right away, of course, but gradually, by implementing some general programs, more jobs will appear in Tajikistan, but still the desire to join in the CU this can also be seen as a desire to be together, striving for something together and this will help Tajikistan and we will come up with something. And about the border, I want to say that the biggest blow will be in Kazakhstan now and in the future it will be so. The drug flow can go in transit not only through Kyrgyzstan but also through other states. And if you leave and do not take Tajikistan to the Customs Union when they themselves ask, they will then be asked to some other union. What's better?
    1. +3
      19 August 2014 16: 09
      Quote: APS
      And about the border, I want to say that the biggest blow will be in Kazakhstan now and in the future it will be so. The drug flow can go in transit not only through Kyrgyzstan but also through other states.


      Oh well . Mukhtar and I are at the border ... My dear, it’s enough to look at a map of Russia to understand where Afghanistan is and where Russia is. After that, if you double-check with whom Russia has a common border, it’s not difficult to understand across the border with which country heroin is pouring dump trucks to Russia.
  8. Dardanec
    +1
    19 August 2014 14: 54
    Quote: SIBERIAN
    I dare to add started and carried out by the Kyrgyz army and the Ministry of Internal Affairs with the support of the Kyrgyz population with one goal - with the aim of robbing the Uzbeks ...

    With the robbery in the end, I agree with this, I doubt only that it was launched from the Kyrgyz side, especially the army and the Ministry of Internal Affairs ....
    1. Siberian
      0
      19 August 2014 15: 01
      Quote: DARDANEC
      In the end, I agree with this robbery, I doubt only that it was launched precisely from the Kyrgyz side, especially the army and the Ministry of Internal Affairs ...


      The Uzbeks were unarmed .... They do not start unarmed clashes ... On the contrary, the Kirghiz were specially prepared, it can be seen by the degree of organization and the number of forces involved ...
  9. Dardanec
    +2
    19 August 2014 15: 00
    Quote: APS
    You know the opinion that after joining the TS, Tajiks will all come to us mistakenly, and so who needs to come to us, it’s more likely not right away, of course, but gradually, by implementing some general programs, more jobs will appear in Tajikistan, but still the desire to join in the CU this can also be seen as a desire to be together, striving for something together and this will help Tajikistan and we will come up with something. And about the border, I want to say that the biggest blow will be in Kazakhstan now and in the future it will be so. The drug flow can go in transit not only through Kyrgyzstan but also through other states. And if you leave and do not take Tajikistan to the Customs Union when they themselves ask, they will then be asked to some other union. What's better?

    It’s a pity you can’t put a few pluses. Sound reasoning, I agree completely!
  10. +3
    19 August 2014 15: 00
    Already from Taj. we have a lot of goodies: a huge number of those who are employed and unemployed have significantly (about 30%) added to the criminal statistics. They also deprive our builders of jobs by lowering the level of wages and the quality of the objects "built" by them. Strengthening drug trafficking. The formation of enclaves is only places of compact residence. The consequences are before our noses - we will wait for the national patrols on the streets of our cities, it will be like in London. But: our bureaucrats are profitable - kickbacks and division of quotas into foreign labor force bring money. And the bureaucrats are beneficial to the Guarantor - without them he "will have no one to work with." You might think the new deck will not pick up. Well, we - the electorate - are needed before the elections or when the "Russians do not surrender" regime is turned on. And that's all. It's a shame but it is so ...
  11. dzau
    +1
    19 August 2014 15: 05
    Grind flour. To organize a coup, put a sane government, put in order the army, the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Whom it is necessary - to buy, whom it is not necessary - to kill.

    Close the border. Reanimate at least some enterprises. In a word, to rake *** stables.

    After putting things in order, you can at least in the vehicle, at least in the Russian Federation. Moreover, completely voluntarily, at the request of the very sane government. No one to learn from?

    In such a state as now - n *** nd are not needed.
  12. Dardanec
    +2
    19 August 2014 15: 17
    Quote: SIBERIAN
    The Uzbeks were unarmed .... They do not start unarmed clashes ... On the contrary, the Kirghiz were specially prepared, it can be seen by the degree of organization and the number of forces involved ...

    This is the territory of Kyrgyzstan, then the state joined in the suppression - hence the high degree of organization, and the number of forces attracted is due to the same is the country of the Kyrgyz, they are here more than all other peoples (72,6%), Uzbeks - 14,5%. The theses you have listed cannot be arguments.
    I’m not going to argue, all the more so to block off someone, I am not either a Kyrgyz or an Uzbek. Most of all I am inclined to the version according to which a sabotage group of a third country (the USA, or their hangers-on) acted on the territory of the republic, showing with all their appearance that they are Uzbeks (although most likely these people were not Uzbeks, and they were also Kyrgyz). This group flaunted locals, possibly from both sides, the operation was carried out with the aim of organizing clashes between Uzbeks and Kyrgyz people and vice versa. The result is known ...
    1. Siberian
      0
      19 August 2014 15: 28
      I did not plan to convince anyone of anything .... The conversation is "not in the subject" ... Sorry ...
  13. -2
    19 August 2014 15: 54
    It is possible and necessary to accept Tajikistan into the Customs Union, the sooner this happens, the better, but something that will be flooded, etc. Well, so they are and so what difference does it make to us!
  14. +1
    19 August 2014 16: 14
    Tajikistan treats Russia very well. At least he does not blame Russia for his problems.
    1. +7
      19 August 2014 17: 55
      Quote: YeSerg
      Tajikistan treats Russia very well.

      They pulled out Russian women from buses and trolleybuses arriving from both sides and raped them here at stops and on a football field near the road, men were brutally beaten.
      Anti-Russian pogroms swept across the city. "Tajikistan for Tajiks!" and
      "Russians, go to your Russia!" - the main slogans of the pogromists. Russian
      robbed, raped and killed even in their own apartments. Not spared and
      children.
      Of the seven hundred thousand inhabitants of the then Dushanbe, three hundred thousand were Russians.
      Soon there was a shortage of doctors and teachers in Russian classes. At my
      daughter in the eighth grade for six months there was no physics teacher that
      forced us to transfer her to another school. It was on these days that the famous
      slogan: "Russians, don't leave - we need slaves!" He decorated the city fences before
      day of departure of our family from Tajikistan.
      Vladimir STARIKOV. A long road to Russia http://rys-arhipelag.ucoz.ru/publ/36-1-0-844
  15. +5
    19 August 2014 16: 33
    In no case should you accept in any union countries that do not have border delimitation agreements with their neighbors, no matter what curtsies they throw out!
    1. +1
      19 August 2014 18: 14
      Quote: AstanaKZ
      In no case should you accept in any union countries that do not have border delimitation agreements with their neighbors, no matter what curtsies they throw out!


      You probably think that Kazakhstan with borders fixed in the manner prescribed by law is everywhere all tip-top. However, I note that this is slightly different.
      1. 0
        19 August 2014 20: 33
        I responsibly declare to you that Kazakhstan has completely delimited its borders with its neighbors! If you have disproving facts, present them!
        1. +1
          20 August 2014 08: 44
          Quote: AstanaKZ
          I responsibly declare to you that Kazakhstan has completely delimited its borders with its neighbors! If you have disproving facts, present them!

          The fact is that on none of the maps that I know of is the left bank of Karkara marked as the territory of Kazakhstan, is considered the territory of Kyrgyzstan under which there was some kind of muddy undercover agreement that had no legal force between Kazakhstan and the Bakiyev family. Access to the territory of citizens of the Kyrgyz Republic by border guards of Kazakhstan is limited in cases when this does not meet the commercial interests of individual non-state structures. In other cases, there are no serious obstacles even for access to the right bank. Before the revolution there was a very famous Karkarinskaya fair. Where there is a benefit, the border there may dissolve or pretend that it has moved. Confirmation can be seen firsthand. In that corner there are other miracles in the sieve associated with the border, but no critical inconvenience hi .
          1. 0
            21 August 2014 19: 07
            Your card is not known to anyone except you!
  16. +2
    19 August 2014 17: 18

    The Russian airline asks Tajikistan to cancel the confiscation of two AN-72
    Recall that in March 2011, airline pilots returned from Kabul after the end of the contract for the delivery of goods for ISAF troops. According to the pilots, they had permission to cross the border, but the Tajik Air Navigation dispatcher stated that there was no permission and demanded a return to Kabul. However, there was no fuel on the way back on the planes, and the pilots had to make an emergency landing in Kurgan-Tyube. There they were detained by employees of the State Committee for National Security.

    19.08.2014/00/35 111864:XNUMX http://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/XNUMX/
    Are the Allies doing this? negative
  17. +1
    19 August 2014 17: 26
    The country in which drug cartels rule must be included in the TS! fool
    1. Past_ Crocodile
      0
      21 August 2014 00: 53
      In the TS we need equal opportunities, otherwise we will get parasites. They had a chance in the days of the USSR, but they did not act decently with us. You can accept as servants and slaves.
  18. 0
    19 August 2014 17: 26
    If jobs are created, and taxes are deducted to the budget of the Russian Federation, then it is possible to attach.
    Only the border does not immediately open. First, master their resources, ensuring stable work for the bulk of the population, in order to reduce labor emigration and strengthen the military presence, to ensure stability in the region and the fight against drug trafficking.
    The same thing can be done with other regions suffering from unstable psyche.
  19. The comment was deleted.