Epic painting: Yanukovych cries bitterly, reading the new laws of Ukraine
Commentators, social activists and unreported journalists continue to curse the cannibal dictatorial laws of January 16, although the text of the new code is already available to everyone who is curious. Against this background, the miserable attempts of the dictator and usurper Yanukovych to streamline the situation in the country by at least minimally correcting the criminal wrestlers that emerged at that time look like helpless childish plays.
The Sanctions Act certainly set the agenda, and one would expect an explosion of human rights indignation from hundreds of non-motivated organizations that declared an irreconcilable struggle for European values and human rights for the generous bounty of our democracy’s sponsors. Silence. Everyone is happy.
Of course, I am not a lawyer, and I do not pretend to have a legal analysis of the document, but questions arise immediately, literally from the preamble, which says that
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, vizyayachi from the Constitution of Ukraine, the Declaration on the sovereign sovereignty of Ukraine and international standards and regulations, (The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, proceeding from the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine and the generally recognized international norms and rules)
Statements, rules of national interests of Ukraine, zokrem, guarantee of constitutional rights and freedoms of people ... (stating that the priorities of the national interests of Ukraine are, in particular, ensuring the constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen ...)
And then the entire further text of the law is directed just at the severe infringement of these rights and freedoms, and above all, the denial of the fundamental principle of modern law - the presumption of innocence. Any citizen, being suspected of committing a series of actions that are difficult to formalize, because they are described purely assessed, without a clear indication of the criteria, rather emotionally than substantively, may be subject to very tough and extensive property sanctions, including extrajudicial expropriation of property.
We talked for so long about the establishment of a law-based state that provides a citizen with the protection of his rights and freedoms precisely in court, with a guaranteed opportunity to defend against the charges, so that during the year of independence, it turned out that all this is a fiction that can be canceled by simple voting in the Rada.
Those who voted for this mass of sanctions are confident that the law has been adopted in full compliance with the Constitution and international legal documents. But I submitted that something like that would have been accepted by some other state - not from the number of new favorite friends of curators of Ukraine. Mmmm, this is where our best human rights forces would rise from the figurative coffin, this is where we would hear such an alarm that we would reach the far corners of the universe, this would be a trizn on the crimes of the monstrous Moloch devouring its children, or how they like to formulate the Russian liberal party in a beautiful way.
That is, in Ukraine, the sanctions offered the most formidable, not to say cannibalistic, but heaven did not fall to the ground. All this could be perceived if martial law was declared in the country, but no — the rest of Ukraine, besides the ATO zone, walks, eats, drinks, enjoys, celebrates, paints bridges and fences in patriotic colors.
Before the vote, the law on sanctions was somewhat softer - the provision banning political parties and closing the media was removed. By the principle - let's first take everything and stifle everything, and then return the dime, and the person will be happy that he has something to buy a ticket on the tram. However, the explanations of a prominent democrat, a liberal and a borsun for rights and freedoms, the chairman of the parliamentary freedom of speech committee (sic!) Of Mykola Tomenko show that in fact the legislators have not left even a dime on the tram. A clause on banning media was removed from the law - the world community is very sensitive to rituals, including an obligatory rite on freedom of speech. So, the odious sanction was removed, as it were, but, Tomenko explained, the committee proposes to simplify the procedure for restricting and prohibiting media activities through the relevant laws "On Television and Television and Radio Broadcasting" and "On the Print Media".
"In the case of television and radio broadcasting, we recognize that, at the request of the SBU, the National Council decides to support specific media outlets for separatism and terrorism within three days, and also decides to temporarily cease the activities of this media until the case is tried in court," Tomenko.
And the court must make a decision within three days and finally confirm or not confirm the support of terrorism by the editorial board of the media. Something tells me that the judges have every reason to fear in the event of a wrong decision to be accused of supporting separatism and terrorism, so I foresee 100% approval of the National Council and SBU verdicts. But even with the inhuman tyrant Stalin, be not remembered at night, in the bloodiest 1935-1938 of the year it was imposed from 10 to 14% of acquittals ...
Now, speaking plainly, anyone who is accused by the pointing finger of the head of state and his oprichnina in a crime against the security of the state, will immediately be deprived of property, assets, shares, licenses, investments - even if he is an oligarch, even the proud owner of a shoe shop, not depressed in his time is terrible Sasha Dentist Meanwhile, in the law there is still such a nice nuance. After a detailed listing of all Egyptian executions that would be brought down on the heads of citizens subject to sanctions, there is an item 29, which, as if fearing that not all types of infringements are provided for, says - other are also possible Sanctions, just according to the principles of their consensus, by the Law. (Sanctions, consistent with the principles of their application, established by this Law.)
I don’t know how this paragraph will be interpreted in law enforcement practice. Perhaps, in administrative delight someone will consider that the principles established in the law will correspond, for example, to torture or public flogging on the Maidan. Anything that is not formalized and not written out to the last letter, and also implies an extrajudicial application procedure, can be used in the widest possible range - right up to the notorious lawlessness and the settling of accounts with undesirable, and sometimes just someone's personal enemies.
Approximately the same way it is possible to interpret the law on lustration adopted today by the Rada, which the people selflessly demanded, confident that now the power will be cleared of growths and scum, and we will live even more beautiful and satisfying. They beat the drums, blocked and blocked, threatened and demanded, and now the law was adopted as a basis, which had been studied before by the jurists who wrote a whole sheet of unsung explanations. “To the head of the management conceptually to the дdtrimu єdeyu, the cleansing of the wilderness, the yak of the mary, is hidden on the wilderness of the system, and the wicked one, who compromised itself, discredited all the people in the whole abo boules pridemnnymi before nyulyuvnya possess in the eyes of the suspension, ruin the rights that freedoms of people, corruption, scho called to the authority of the authority of the middle population before the fall " - reads the preamble. (The head office conceptually supports the idea of cleaning up power, which should be aimed at excluding from the system of power those who in one way or another compromised themselves and discredited all power in general, or were involved in leveling power in the eyes of society, violations of human rights and freedoms corruption, which led to a drop in authority among the population)
Mathematicians who use the principle instead of the multiplication table - do we buy or sell? - are deprived of the right to be considered representatives of exact science, and even, perhaps, are recognized as scattered. Lawyers who use the principle of lyrical understanding of reality according to their own ideas about beauty, meanwhile, do not lose their diplomas and licenses, but continue to confidently inflate their cheeks, trying to cram nevpihimoe. If there is no ruler, how to measure the length? If there are no criteria, how can you tell if someone was involved in leveling the authorities in the eyes of society, or they settle accounts with him for his principles, or solve business disputes, or simply squeeze out property, or someone more cleverly coined for his position?
However, my questions are clearly outdated and do not keep up with the progress of our loud-boiling life, in which moral and legal relativism triumphed. Here, if only it didn’t get to the favorite question “Gry, but we’re for it ?!”, and the rest of the society of the victorious democracy, human rights and freedoms formed a consensus, enshrined in the described laws.
At this moment it is very important to give people spectacles, because with bread in the broad sense of the word, things are sadder. Tariffs, prices, the dollar. Ahead of the winter without heat, and perhaps even light. The ingenious call of the intellectual mayor of Kiev, Klitschko, to stock up on boilers and heaters has crashed about the harsh truth of life - it is likely that boilers and heaters will have nowhere to stick, and Vitaly Vladimirovich’s eloquence is hardly enough to warm everyone. The despicable coal from the deeply subsidized mines of Donbass, which hung like a weight on the neck of our beautiful economy, suddenly turned out to be not enough for the heat and power plants to produce electricity and even heat somewhere. The fighters for the unity of Ukraine did everything to make the energy independence of the Motherland a simulacrum.
Today, the law on the reform of the GTS was adopted, according to experts, giving our national wealth, with which the right patriots have rushed for so many years, not to hell with dogs. However, this topic did not cause any excitement - public opinion is passionate about sanctions and lustration, theatrical entertainment and show potential of which is incomparably higher than that of a boring economy, which, however, still has its say.
When the deputies gave people such fun as lustrations and sanctions, the board on the exchangers no longer look so dreary, and the rent receipts are so monstrous, especially since Yatsenyuk promises through the adopted law on the simplification of doing business three hundred billion dollars in the foreseeable future. So there’s nothing to be sad about, while waiting for Godot, you can still jog and troll the Russians with the possible lack of oysters and marble meat.
And a few words about humanism. 280 KAMAZs with Russian humanitarian aid stand on the border with Ukraine, not allowed into the country by a caring Ukrainian government. Domestic wits have already suggested that Yanukovych is being taken in cars, Tanks, multiple launch rocket systems, tons of napalm and a couple of submarines buried directly in buckwheat, but it seems that the burden is still humanitarian, but ideologically wrong.
And then Paul Picard, who is the head of the OSCE mission to monitor the situation on the Russian-Ukrainian border, has declared no violations of international laws on the part of Russia. The mission stayed for a week in Gukovo and Donetsk. So, Picard at a press conference, commenting on the accusations against the Russians, they supposedly fired at us from their territory, preparing the intervention, said - “we didn’t observe anything like that at these two points”. It can not annoy.
So, in these tense conditions, despite the fact that Western countries have advised Poroshenko to accept the goods, the patriotic hysteria in the run-up to the elections makes this step a guarantor oppressive for his rating. People thirst for blood and death, there is no time for weakheartedness. Social networks are filled with ideas one kinder to another - to set fire to, blow up, lie across the caravan, ditch this damn aid to the damned Colorado. And, no, nobody wants to lie across the caravan, it's just a flight of my imagination.
In general, according to official data, humanitarian aid from the Cabinet of Ministers was urgently sent to the Donbass - of course, overnight, we do not have it otherwise. Well, at least they reported that they sent. For two weeks in Lugansk there is no electricity, water, gas supply and communications with large interruptions, people have no money in the grocery stores, but our government incessantly cracked about the absence of any humanitarian problems there - as Psaki ordered. And suddenly such mercy. But again, not without piquant details. Help is being taken to Starobelsk, and where it comes from, God knows. Something tells me that they are not in the houses of the suffering Luhansk citizens. Neither a specific recipient is specified, nor — most importantly, the administrator, nor the responsible person. Transparency is our everything, we remember.
And about the beautiful. Today, the undoubted and undisputed leader of all the beautiful is Lyashko with a stuffed mug. I do not know who can stand the shrill cries of this strange mammal for more than 30 seconds. So the deputy of BP with the heroic name Shevchenko could not stand it. The insane klikusha Lyashko, who galloped like a flea across the lobby of the Rada in anticipation of the usual portrayal of his verbal exploits by the Ukrainian TV channels, ran into a simple, concrete person, but with a lower threshold of sensitivity to flickering and screams.
In general, from one, in appearance, a small blow, the hero of interrogation and torture, a brave and sharp Batman suddenly reeled, as if getting a knockdown. I think he performed. After all, he, in fact, was thrown into a glove, to which the gentlemen of the hussars would certainly respond with readiness for a duel, but with this, Oleg Valerievich did not grow together. He dared solely in the presence of a large number of armed guards. Therefore, we had to turn on the artist and portray the injury that was incompatible with participation in the honor duel.
The performance was short but dramatic, thanks.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.