Military Review
Sign In Register

Destined Syria C-300 SAMs will be recycled

133
Russia is disposing of the C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems, which at one time were intended for Syria, said InterfaxKonstantin Biryulin, deputy head of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation.



"They will be disposed of"- Biryulin told a journalist.

According to him, the decision to terminate the contract with Syria for the supply of complexes was made in the framework of UN sanctions by the leaders of the Russian Federation. “We did not break (the contract). This decision was made within the framework of the relevant UN sanctions, according to the decision of our political leadership. ”- said the agency interlocutor.

Biryulin noted that there were attempts to sell these air defense systems to other countries, but there were no buyers. "If this technique has not found the appropriate application, it will be disposed of"- said the deputy head of the FS BTC.

“There is such a moment (the possibility of resale of the complexes), but rather, the second option will be adopted here (recycling)”- summed up Biryulin.
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
133 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avt
    avt 12 August 2014 21: 17
    +33
    “Biryulin noted that attempts were made to sell these air defense systems to other countries, but no buyers were found. "If this technique has not found an appropriate application, it will be disposed of," said the deputy head of the FS MTC. laughing laughingAnd the Kazakhs on duty second-hand shoot! ???
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 12 August 2014 21: 24
      +115
      Something is amiss here, it wouldn’t work out like with Iran. Dispose of the S-300 in anticipation of the upcoming war with Ukraine, which, by order of Washington, will soon begin military operations in the Crimea, the decision, frankly, is in the style of Serdyukov.
      1. sergey261180
        sergey261180 12 August 2014 21: 29
        +28
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Something is wrong here

        Sly plan probably lol
        1. Himalayan
          Himalayan 12 August 2014 21: 40
          +33
          In Belarus, they will not be superfluous ... For the same exercises. But disposed of? -
          Something is wrong, I hope
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. yushch
            yushch 12 August 2014 22: 19
            +14
            Quote: Himalayan
            In Belarus, they will not be superfluous ... For the same exercises. But disposed of? -
            Something is wrong, I hope


            Everything is so voiced. It’s just for Belarus that the S 300 comes with the same characteristics as for us. And the versions are more simplified for export, why it wasn’t delivered to Iran. The S-300 did not get sanctions.
            1. Tron
              Tron 12 August 2014 22: 36
              +8
              Quote: yushch
              Just for Belarus, the C 300 comes with the same features as for us. And for export, versions that are more simplified

              Of course, I am a layman, but why not replace only the electronics? Or something else is needed?
              1. GRAY
                GRAY 12 August 2014 22: 41
                +3
                Quote: TroN
                Of course, I am a layman, but why not replace only the electronics? Or something else is needed?

                The chassis may be different, for example, KrAZ, and the Unas and Belarusians are in the MAZ trend.
              2. vsoltan
                vsoltan 12 August 2014 23: 43
                +4
                Total system of identification "friend or foe"
            2. fyodor
              fyodor 12 August 2014 23: 57
              +10
              Breaking down is not building, we could wait and sell to friendly countries, everything is some kind of profit, but it turns out in the furnace and all the same losses, well, we’ll do anything rich so it turns out.
              1. Manul
                Manul 13 August 2014 04: 34
                +5
                Quote: fiodor
                Breaking down is not building, we could wait and sell to friendly countries, everything is some kind of profit, but it turns out in the furnace and all the same losses, well, we’ll do anything rich so it turns out.

                I agree. There is such a thing as preservation. Neither fool yourself - the most difficult weapons of multi-million worth - to take into scrap metal .. Immediately before your eyes, the frames of the White Swans saw .. Teeth creak from impotence .. What kind of nonsense is going on ?? ?
          3. Azovian
            Azovian 12 August 2014 23: 28
            -2
            still cry with Lukashenko. There are hotter places where the S-300 is waiting. Not lingering.
          4. ramzes1776
            ramzes1776 13 August 2014 01: 09
            +2
            In Transbaikalia, on the border with China, not a single such complex has been and still is not. What the hell kind of disposal ??? Or is it a fake ???
            1. Jrvin
              Jrvin 13 August 2014 04: 01
              -1
              Fake of course =) I myself am from Transbaikalia =)
            2. FACKtoREAL
              FACKtoREAL 13 August 2014 06: 36
              -1
              Quote: ramzes1776
              In Transbaikalia, on the border with China, not a single such complex has been and still is not. What the hell kind of disposal ???

              get along persecuting stupidity or ignorance?
              1. ramzes1776
                ramzes1776 13 August 2014 13: 16
                +2
                Quote: FACKtoREAL
                get along persecuting stupidity or ignorance?

                Well, spinners with your knowledge. Where in Buryatia and the Trans-Baikal Territory are the S-300 complexes ??? And a reference to the resource, please. I’ll lay it down. I’ve served in these places for 14 years.
          5. Bastion ammur
            Bastion ammur 13 August 2014 05: 41
            0
            I assume that the word "recycling" means modernization.
        2. WKS
          WKS 12 August 2014 22: 01
          +5
          Quote: sergey261180
          Quote: Thought Giant
          Something is wrong here

          Sly plan probably lol

          Or the information is false.
          1. Belopolyak
            Belopolyak 13 August 2014 02: 03
            +4
            Quote: wks
            Quote: sergey261180
            Quote: Thought Giant
            Something is wrong here

            Sly plan probably lol

            Or the information is false.

            I saw this article in only one yellow newspaper, now here ....., but as I understand it here is the collection of information from all resources, and not my data .... do you print yellow press information?
        3. scientist
          scientist 12 August 2014 22: 31
          +55
          Look at the news through a search engine. This is a reprint from Echo of Moscow! Found something to believe. Another mess to excite people. Echo of Moscow has long become one of the American instruments of "controlled chaos"
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 12 August 2014 22: 42
            +13
            Quote: scientist
            Another mess to excite people.
            The main thing is to shake the situation, but how - it does not matter. Sow dissatisfaction with the "empty-headed" government. The silversmiths must be worked out.
          2. Mikhail Zubarev
            Mikhail Zubarev 12 August 2014 23: 04
            +5
            Hooray to you comrade, otherwise I ooh .. mmm was surprised at this news.
          3. samoletil18
            samoletil18 12 August 2014 23: 30
            +7
            Damn, I read the article 2 times with a fright!
          4. Shoma-1970
            Shoma-1970 13 August 2014 00: 52
            0
            It is necessary to get hold of an analogue of one cock from the glad, in order to expel the ass .... from the "Echo" and for one fifth column. I am writing shortly, because I am afraid to anger our kind moderators.
          5. Manul
            Manul 13 August 2014 04: 36
            +1
            Quote: scientist
            Look at the news through a search engine. This is a reprint from Echo of Moscow! Found something to believe. Another mess to excite people. Echo of Moscow has long become one of the American instruments of "controlled chaos"

            hi Reassured.
          6. lecturer
            lecturer 13 August 2014 07: 00
            +1

            scientist Yesterday, 22:31 ↑


            Look at the news through a search engine. This is a reprint from Echo of Moscow! Found something to believe. Another mess to excite people. Echo of Moscow has long become one of the American instruments of "controlled chaos"
            - Thank you personally!
          7. 225chay
            225chay 13 August 2014 09: 34
            +1
            Quote: scientist
            Look at the news through a search engine. This is a reprint from Echo of Moscow! Found something to believe. Another mess to excite people. Echo of Moscow has long become one of the American instruments of "controlled chaos"


            Well, why have the authorities still not eliminated this "tool" - a machine for spreading gamna?
        4. matross
          matross 12 August 2014 22: 54
          +20
          Quote: sergey261180
          Tricky plan probably lol

          Yeah. Very clever. Someone threw a fake, and here we are dancing. Well, who and where in the world destroys new and excellent products for any purpose ??! They will put a maximum on conservation.
          And then we wonder - how is it that the dill was zombified "only" in 23 years ?! Themselves are even ready to believe anyone instantly ...
          1. lecturer
            lecturer 13 August 2014 06: 59
            +2

            matRoss (1)  Yesterday, 22:54 PM ↑



            Quote: sergey261180

            Tricky plan probably lol

            Yeah. Very clever. Someone threw a fake, and here we are dancing. Well, who and where in the world destroys new and excellent products for any purpose ??! They will put a maximum on conservation.
            And then we wonder - how is it that the dill was zombified "only" in 23 years ?! Themselves are even ready to believe anyone instantly ...
            - Clear and beautiful! 5 points!
            PS And in general, marine quick wits ...!
        5. Oprychnyk
          Oprychnyk 12 August 2014 23: 19
          +2
          Are there any controls over disposal? You can say: "That's right!" And keep a fig in your pocket.
        6. Cat
          Cat 12 August 2014 23: 31
          +1
          Far cunning ...
        7. Shoma-1970
          Shoma-1970 13 August 2014 00: 45
          +2
          Never mind recycling, in extreme cases, they are free to Cuba or Venezuela, where they are needed!
        8. DMB-88
          DMB-88 13 August 2014 01: 54
          +1
          Quote: sergey261180
          Quote: Thought Giant
          Something is wrong here

          Sly plan probably lol


          if this is not a fake, then insanity grows stronger!
        9. RusDV
          RusDV 13 August 2014 04: 33
          0
          Quote: sergey261180
          Quote: Thought Giant
          Something is wrong here

          Sly plan probably lol

          100%. Such things are never said out loud for no reason .... Five years later we find out the truth .... winked
        10. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 13 August 2014 04: 39
          +1
          Quote: sergey261180
          Sly plan probably

          The cunning plan of patients with Down syndrome.
        11. Workshop
          Workshop 13 August 2014 18: 00
          0
          I thought about that too. More like a word game request
      2. sub307
        sub307 12 August 2014 21: 47
        +3
        Yes, some kind of infa: if ... maybe ..., most likely, maybe not ... but, all the same, yes, if, what ....
        1. sergey261180
          sergey261180 12 August 2014 22: 17
          +5
          Quote: sub307
          Yes, some kind of infa: if ... maybe ..., most likely, maybe not ... but, all the same, yes, if, what ....

          Did you get hold of Klitschko? lol

          Yesterday, not everyone can do anything ... laughing
          1. Stump
            Stump 12 August 2014 22: 37
            +2
            I wish everyone
          2. RusDV
            RusDV 13 August 2014 04: 36
            0
            Quote: sergey261180
            Quote: sub307
            Yes, some kind of infa: if ... maybe ..., most likely, maybe not ... but, all the same, yes, if, what ....

            Did you get hold of Klitschko? lol

            Yesterday, not everyone can do anything ... laughing

            Shaw, you insult the nickname smile a monument has already been erected to him ... the miraculous truth ....
        2. SSR
          SSR 12 August 2014 22: 25
          +2
          Sorry off topic but at the box office.


          RIA News
          20:54
          Switzerland forbade Russian Knights to participate in AIR14 air show
          The Swiss Defense Ministry has denied the Russian aerobatic team "Russian Knights" to participate in the AIR14 air show, which is to take place on August 30-31 and September 6-7 in the city of Payern. The official statement of the department says that such a decision was made after consultations with the Swiss Foreign Ministry.

          Clicking on the nose of IMH, it seems like not sanction but also a spit in our direction, I think that the Russian Federation should pinch something to them but what? Maybe they’ll stop sending specialists from Russia to the cern (this is a bad joke), but how can they / can we answer? Any suggestions?
          1. Alex31
            Alex31 12 August 2014 22: 57
            +8
            They have wormy chocolate with a codling moth. They don’t know how to honestly work, but all the same.
          2. matross
            matross 12 August 2014 23: 17
            +1
            Quote from S.S.R.
            what can / can answer? Any suggestions?

            It suggests itself, of course, they banned, and the Knights will still arrive and pilot the chocolate bankers not childishly ... but you really can't take the doormen for a ruble for twenty, you have to wipe yourself off, alas.
            1. Azovian
              Azovian 12 August 2014 23: 30
              +1
              The country is indescribable - there is nowhere for the heroes to turn around ...
          3. ydjin
            ydjin 13 August 2014 03: 50
            0
            So like they are neutral? Or is it time to bring their coordinates into the mission of our strategic missiles?
          4. mik0588
            mik0588 13 August 2014 06: 16
            0
            No wonder, they were secretly selling "heavy water" to the Fuhrer during the VO.
      3. Bobxnumx
        Bobxnumx 12 August 2014 21: 48
        +8
        Making a weapon "to order" is a complicated thing - this is not a mass production. It is prepared according to the specific requirements of the customer. It's like "Mistrals", if the French don't give them to us, no one needs them anymore, only for scrap, because they were made for specific customer requirements. what
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 12 August 2014 22: 52
          +5
          Quote: Bob0859
          Making weapons "to order" is a complicated thing - It is prepared according to the specific requirements of the customer ... if no one else needs them, only for scrap,

          And to practice the calculations, keeping your "combat" missiles. Or letting the cadets shoot - isn't this a gift for the boys !?
          And what cannot be "gifted" to Nicaragua or Cuba as a gesture of goodwill? and get political dividends for it? In extreme cases, "put in reserve".
          So, it is hard to believe in this info.
        2. Alex31
          Alex31 12 August 2014 23: 08
          +3
          The specific requirements of the customer were purely environmental - to unload the Panama Canal by the more spacious name of Stalin. Probably someone paid more. Green Peace can.
      4. typhoon7
        typhoon7 12 August 2014 21: 53
        +4
        I agree that the latest missiles that Russia has put in abundance in Syria do not fall under the sanctions, and the purely defensive S-300s come under the sanctions. It is useless to search for logic here, it is a political decision.
        1. Normal
          Normal 12 August 2014 22: 05
          +2
          Quote: typhoon7
          I agree that the latest missiles that Russia has put in abundance in Syria do not fall under sanctions

          What are these? Enlighten, do not consider it work.

          Quote: typhoon7
          purely defensive S-300s were sanctioned

          Consequently, the offensive did not fall under the sanctions?

          Quote: typhoon7
          It is useless to look for logic here, this is politics.

          No comments (site rules do not allow)
        2. gennady.ru
          gennady.ru 12 August 2014 22: 43
          +1
          The political decision, I agree, but the money, labor, sweat is popular and who gave them the right to decide for the people and squander money, the labor of thousands of people? Political decision, burst, here pay and sit for such stupid decisions. Do we have people live better than anyone in the world? I think another scam, as with a defense service or sabotage. At such a time, get up! WHO TO BELIEVE ?????????????
      5. Pilat2009
        Pilat2009 12 August 2014 21: 57
        +3
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Something is amiss, it wouldn’t work out like with Iran

        And what are the sanctions in Syria?
        And now we are friends with Iran, you can tease Abamych
        No, it’s wasteful to dispose of
        Quote: APASUS
        because there are plenty of orders

        Where will we deliver and in what quantities?
        Factories are building under S-400-500 and new missiles
      6. Ujin61
        Ujin61 12 August 2014 22: 05
        +1
        The more oaks in the army, the stronger our fool defense is indestructible.
      7. zennon
        zennon 12 August 2014 22: 08
        +2
        Quote: Thought Giant
        in anticipation of the upcoming war with Ukraine, which, by order of Washington, will soon begin military operations in Crimea,

        What war with dill, did you eat something? Have you seen their army? Their equipment? They’re men taking away tanks. Can you even imagine what will happen to them if you put the Pskov Airborne Division against them?
        1. Rblipetsk
          Rblipetsk 12 August 2014 22: 15
          +2
          Quote: zennon
          Have you seen their army? Their equipment? The peasants are taking away tanks from them. Can you even imagine what will happen to them if you put the Pskov Airborne Division against them?

          as I recall the story of how the militia drove an Ukrop armored personnel carrier with a chainsaw through the forest ..... laughing laughing good
          1. Native grandfather
            Native grandfather 12 August 2014 23: 07
            +1
            Quote: RBLipetsk
            as I recall the story of how the militia drove an Ukrop armored personnel carrier with a chainsaw through the forest .....

            Yeah, that was the case. I, too, laughed for a long time at ukrovoyaki. :) They didn’t drive the current there in the forest, but in some locality (forgot the name).
        2. sergkar
          sergkar 13 August 2014 02: 10
          +1
          Quote: zennon
          They have men robbed tanks.

          If you do not mind: - they have men, with a chainsaw - they take away tanks! laughing hi
          1. muginov2015
            muginov2015 13 August 2014 04: 00
            0
            probably they wanted to recycle.
      8. not main
        not main 12 August 2014 23: 30
        +1
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Dispose of S-300

        But you can dispose of it in different ways. You can stupidly cut, but you can dispose of it for its intended purpose and where it is not particularly important.
      9. nikoli25
        nikoli25 12 August 2014 23: 38
        +3
        yes fake this, where is the link to the source?
      10. 77bob1973
        77bob1973 12 August 2014 23: 39
        +1
        Infa just gives away rotten and Serdyukovschina, there is no causal relationship ...
      11. AVIATOR36662
        AVIATOR36662 12 August 2014 23: 40
        +1
        The issue with the Crimea is closed forever! No one will ever begin any action! Of course, for a long time some pizboli will procrastinate this topic, but it will be purely personal PR, nothing more.
      12. Cadet787
        Cadet787 13 August 2014 00: 33
        +1
        I don’t understand what is happening, maybe someone will explain? Is there no logic in this act, or is it a stuffing?
      13. poquello
        poquello 13 August 2014 00: 40
        +1
        Quote: Giant thought
        Something is amiss here, it wouldn’t work out like with Iran. Dispose of the S-300 in anticipation of the upcoming war with Ukraine, which, by order of Washington, will soon begin military operations in the Crimea, the decision, frankly, is in the style of Serdyukov.

        Airplanes bombing Donetsk flew from NATO base in Romania
        A Canadian journalist who worked with social media outreach groups noted that "several military planes" took off from NATO bases and other sites.
        Bombers who bombed civilian targets in Eastern Ukraine, flying with the Ukrainian Air Force identification marks, were connected to air bases located in Romania and Moldova, they were equipped, and some were possibly piloted, by Poles and Israelis.
        Canadian journalist Geoffrey West, working with social media reporting groups, noted that "several military aircraft" flying over Ukrainian airspace took off from NATO bases and other facilities. "I discovered on Thursday night on the tracking website ... that a whole series of 'no callsign' flights were seen in the Ukraine / Black Sea area. A friend of mine noticed that they appeared in the Bucharest area. I noted that it was near Chisinau , Moldova ".

        http://dnestr.tv/3974-ukrainskiy-krizis-lenta-novostey.html
      14. atarix
        atarix 13 August 2014 07: 01
        0
        In total, it was underprinted
        disposed of by the launch method for a real purpose.
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 12 August 2014 21: 28
      +8
      And the Kazakhs on duty second-hand shoot! ???

      Kazakhs want Iskander to buy, and not Iskander-E, but Iskander-M. Apparently we will suppress the Uzbek missile defense system bully
    3. Nayhas
      Nayhas 12 August 2014 21: 29
      +5
      Quote: avt
      And the Kazakhs on duty second-hand shoot! ???

      Yes, it seems that these S-300s are also not the first freshness. Otherwise, what is the point of disposing? Well, the question is of course why the junk was offered to the Syrians? Or did you know in advance that it’s not good anyway?
    4. Finches
      Finches 12 August 2014 21: 30
      +18
      Broad is my native country! It has a lot of forests, fields and rivers ..., superfluous modern anti-aircraft missile systems, into which taxpayer money is swollen and, in general, Russia is a generous soul!
      1. Juborg
        Juborg 12 August 2014 21: 43
        +11
        This is not generosity, but Russian idiocy. Can you show at least one example when mattresses disposed of air defense systems? They are junk for big amounts of money to the third world countries, such as Poland, Romania, and some sort of Zambia or Zaire. Truly Russian sloppiness has no borders. Friends, you yourself in your yard, have you disposed of a lot of unnecessary equipment in the trash? I’ll say for you, you put every bolt in a jar, put every unnecessary board in a barn, but come in handy. And here SAMs are not needed. What Belarusians for free for what loyalty we deliver?
        1. Finches
          Finches 12 August 2014 21: 50
          +7
          Perhaps Kostya Biryulin was discharged and was just joking? Either he is our local talking head, he did not have time to consult in the office, so he blurted out the first one that came across!
          I don’t want to think that this is idiocy, or it smacks of betrayal of national interests or banal theft on an especially large scale!
        2. lukke
          lukke 12 August 2014 22: 11
          +2
          Yes, even to Cuba in exchange for renting berths - everything is some kind of profitable move, and so ...: "half a liter to smithereens ?! Yes, I will ..."
        3. 225chay
          225chay 12 August 2014 22: 58
          0
          Quote: juborg
          This is not generosity, but Russian idiocy. Can you show at least one example when mattresses disposed of air defense systems? They are junk for big amounts of money to the third world countries, such as Poland, Romania, and some sort of Zambia or Zaire. Truly Russian sloppiness has no borders.


          Respected! You calm the broom a bit. What Russians (Slavs) rule in Russia since 1917 ?, Lenin, Trotsky, Sverdlov, Dzerzhinsky, Kamenev, Martov, Zinoviev, etc. - were there Russians? Or after the 1991 coup. Eltsin, G. Kharitonov, Gaidar, Kozyrev, Aven, Stankevich, Sobchak, Luzhkov, Chubayts, Medvedev Which of the Russians (Slavs) led our country and gave orders?
          That hangs on Russian jambs
        4. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 12 August 2014 23: 01
          +4
          Quote: juborg
          Truly Russian sloppiness has no borders.
          So you, colleague, infa plunged into disbelief. Of course, idiocy locally takes place, but not at the same level!
    5. enot73
      enot73 12 August 2014 21: 34
      +4
      Quote: avt
      ,, Biryulin noted that attempts were made to sell these air defense systems to other countries, but there were no buyers. “If this equipment has not found appropriate application, it will be disposed of,” the deputy director said.
      Dont be upset . IMHO these S-300s will pop up somewhere, they just don’t want to tease the geese ahead of time, so it’s tense with the West.
      1. Normal
        Normal 12 August 2014 22: 09
        +1
        Quote: enot73
        IMHO these S-300s will pop up somewhere, they just don’t want to tease the geese ahead of time, so it’s tense with the West.


        Well, the "Sly Plan" has surfaced.
        Why are you like that? They handed over the super secret secret plan.
        Oh you ...
        1. coolvoldik
          coolvoldik 12 August 2014 22: 28
          +9
          I remember a year ago

          Very reminiscent of the story with our military assistance to New Russia.
          1. Normal
            Normal 12 August 2014 22: 44
            -6
            Quote: coolvoldik
            And I remember a year ago ....


            Yeah ... A year ago, the campaign of loyal subordinates in the style of Putin and Spassokhranil all the victories won no limit.

            Quote: coolvoldik
            Very reminiscent of the story with our military assistance to New Russia.

            And now there is no shortage of statements like "Putin did not merge anyone" and "Putin will not merge Novorossia".
            Only recently, fights were fought for Slavyansk and Semenovka, and now for Donetsk and Lugansk
            1. huut
              huut 12 August 2014 22: 57
              +1
              Quote: Normal
              Yeah ... A year ago, the campaign of loyal subordinates in the style of Putin and Spassokhranil all the victories won no limit.

              What specific actions of Putin regarding Syria do not suit you? What did you think did wrong there, and how was it to be done?
              1. Normal
                Normal 12 August 2014 23: 07
                -4
                Quote: huut
                ...you...
                in your opinion ...


                Are you familiar with me for a long time?
                Children were baptized with me ...
                They drank to Brudershaft ...

                No?

                Well then go to your profile and check out my previous comments.
                Then, maybe the stupid questions to ask the hunt will be gone.

                See you soon! hi
                1. huut
                  huut 12 August 2014 23: 41
                  +1
                  Quote: Normal
                  See you soon!

                  And so it happened!
                  Do all "normal" ones shy away from answers when they talk about specifics?

                  And one moment:
                  It remains only to finally open his eyes and realize what is happening.
                  But it is not easy.
                  It is painful and bitter.

                  Is that all you can tell after realizing that Putin does not suit you? Are you going to "grieve" now?
                  Or maybe you’re inventing your political program, you will begin to promote it to the masses, you will engage in the social sphere, etc.
                  You will find a worthy candidate, more talented, and engage in his promotion. Or maybe there are options?
                  Why are you here for two years vparivat this dregs? The purpose of this action - "painfully bitter" and that's it?

                  On "you", apparently, the san does not allow you to communicate, or "blue" blood) And then, you see, all the peasant sivolapes "poke". Yes we are nothing, we are teachable)
                  1. Normal
                    Normal 13 August 2014 00: 12
                    -4
                    Quote: huut
                    And then it happened! ....
                    On "you", apparently, the san does not allow you to communicate or "blue" blood)


                    But wouldn’t you go far into the light?
            2. tantalum
              tantalum 13 August 2014 03: 40
              0
              Quote: Normal
              and already ... A year ago, the campaign of loyal subordinates in the style of Putin, saved and saved all the victories knew no bounds


              Quote: Normal
              Only recently, fights were fought for Slavyansk and Semenovka, and now for Donetsk and Lugansk

              are you happy?
              And if you dig deeper in your soul?
              Judging by your comments, any failure of both the President and the whole country makes you deeply satisfied.
              1. Normal
                Normal 13 August 2014 09: 17
                -1
                Quote: Tantal
                are you happy?

                Why do you think so?
                Quote: Tantal
                Judging by your comments, any failure of both the President and the whole country makes you deeply satisfied.

                Everything is very simple. Find such a comment and, in order not to be unfounded, post quotes from it.
                Politicians feel deep satisfaction, and I feel bitter regret that someone either has not yet received his sight, or does not want to see the obvious, or, in my opinion, has seen his sight quite late.

                PS
                But did our President have setbacks?
        2. Russ69
          Russ69 12 August 2014 22: 36
          -9
          Quote: Normal
          Well, the "Sly Plan" has surfaced.

          As I understand it, the whole trick of the GDP is to merge everyone beautifully so that the West will like it. The Kremlin, I’ve already tried all the poses, just to please ...
          1. Normal
            Normal 12 August 2014 22: 57
            -11
            Quote: Russ69
            As I understand it, the whole trick of the GDP is to merge everyone beautifully,

            For more than two years I have been explaining this, well, at least one has come and thank God!
            True, the merit is not mine, but of Putin's foreign "partners"
            Do not heed the truth, the West will turn the situation in such a way that the GDP will inevitably show itself from the present, and not lacquered pro-government propaganda.
            It remains only to finally open his eyes and realize what is happening.
            But it is not easy.
            It is painful and bitter.
            1. GRAY
              GRAY 12 August 2014 23: 01
              +7
              Quote: Normal
              For more than two years I have been explaining this, well, at least one has come and thank God!

              Yes, it didn’t reach him, he’s just the same, you found each other.
              laughing laughing laughing
              1. Normal
                Normal 12 August 2014 23: 17
                -6
                Quote: GRAY
                Yes did not reach him

                It didn’t reach you, well, it’s a matter of time and ability to perceive and evaluate reality.

                Quote: GRAY
                It’s just the same, you found each other.


                You are too "young" by the site's standards and have no idea about our months-long confrontation with Russia.
                If he were like me, why would I remind him of the past?
                1. GRAY
                  GRAY 12 August 2014 23: 24
                  +3
                  Quote: Normal
                  If he were like me, why would I remind him of the past

                  And what about the past? I am about the present: Putin has all but offered to surrender.
                  1. Normal
                    Normal 12 August 2014 23: 34
                    -3
                    Quote: GRAY

                    And what about the past?

                    And where are you? Not knowing what it is about, you are not getting into your own business with the appearance of an all-knowing expert.
                    Quote: GRAY
                    I'm about the present ...

                    And I'm about the present
                    Quote: Normal
                    ... more recently, fights were fought for Slavyansk and Semenovka, and now for Donetsk and Lugansk

                    And leave the "putivsyoslilkatsvsegdapplazdal" to communicate with friends. Fooling around does not mean essentially objecting.
                    1. tantalum
                      tantalum 13 August 2014 03: 46
                      +1
                      Quote: Normal
                      Yeah ... A year ago, the campaign of loyal subordinates in the style of Putin and Spassokhranil all the victories won no limit.

                      Quote: Normal
                      And leave the "putivsyoslilkatsvsegdapplazdal" to communicate with friends. Fooling around does not mean essentially objecting.

                      well said:)
            2. SPACE
              SPACE 13 August 2014 02: 12
              +3
              Quote: Russ69
              As I understand it, the whole trick of the GDP is how to merge everyone beautifully

              Whom and what Putin will merge is written on the water with a pitchfork, but the fact that you have already merged does not require proof. Welcome to the society of the white-gondon toilet ... sooner or later, but everything falls into place, eagles fly, rats merge ...
              Quote: Normal
              It remains only to finally open my eyes

              But after all, only the "normal" fool the most widely open belay eyes ... laughing
              By the way, you have a very necessary nickname, without it it is really difficult to guess who you are lol
              He remembered the joke: Two guys are coming and a beautiful girl is walking towards them, passing by, the girl is smiling.
              One to the other: You know, this girl liked me.
              Second: Why else?
              First: And she looked at me and smiled at me ...
              Second: No wonder, when I first saw you, I spent two hours stealing ... laughing
      2. samoletil18
        samoletil18 12 August 2014 23: 45
        0
        Quote: enot73
        Dont be upset . IMHO these S-300s will pop up somewhere, they just don’t want to tease geese ahead of time, so it’s tense with the West

        Last year, there was information that the Iranian S-300 is also being disposed of. In the context of the fact that the package is different, the software is different, special requirements do not fit ...
        I hope recycling is understood as rework.
    6. 225chay
      225chay 12 August 2014 21: 36
      +16
      Quote: avt
      “If this technique has not found appropriate application, it will be disposed of,”


      What the fucking wealthy or what?
      That BZHRK disposed of-cut, then TU-160, then nuclear submarines, then OKU, etc ....

      It’s being built with national money, it turns out that our children will be taken away from us, and then it will be disposed of for some reason.
      They sold Yugoslavia, Iraq just ... ali, they didn’t give it to Iran, they drove India with horseradish in the face for a long time ...
      In general, who controls our government, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and all kinds of FS ES?
      They will sell the whole country to x ... Ram and will not ask our desire!
      1. Normal
        Normal 12 August 2014 22: 14
        -1
        Quote: 225chay
        What the fucking wealthy or what?


        Yes, calm down you. If this is true, then the leadership will present this action as a manifestation of goodwill, a desire to reduce tension and the desire for cooperation with the entire civilized world.
        And all loyal subjects will sing about this "Glory!"
        Everything will be fine, you will see.
      2. not main
        not main 12 August 2014 23: 39
        +1
        Quote: 225chay
        That BZHRK disposed of-cut, then TU-160, then nuclear submarines, then OKU, etc ....

        BZHRK merged Gorbachev, OKU and so on, and TU-160 were cut by jumpers. And you can dispose of for its intended purpose!
    7. theadenter
      theadenter 12 August 2014 21: 39
      +8
      We write, but in a quiet fusion to someone. wassat
      1. gennady.ru
        gennady.ru 12 August 2014 23: 03
        +1
        Well, why should people get on their nerves? Could somehow smarter write, And then recycle. I gave my whole life to the factory, became disabled and hearing this from some bureaucrat, it’s for me to bury as a native child.
    8. Russian1974
      Russian1974 12 August 2014 21: 54
      +7
      Yeah it's a joke hike soldier
    9. Juborg
      Juborg 12 August 2014 22: 42
      +1
      Friends, maybe we are hinted at something that will turn over the completely defense doctrine of the world, A ?!

      Russia is developing 40 technological projects to create weapons of the future, the sixth technological order, RIA Novosti reports with reference to the National Defense magazine.

      “In accordance with the program of activities of the Foundation for Advanced Research, practical measures are currently being taken to implement 23 projects. By the end of the year, they will increase to 40. Each project of FPI is already the sixth technological structure, ”said Dmitry Rogozin in an author's article published in the last issue of the magazine.

      Reportedly, now in the Russian Armed Forces mainly weapons of the third or fourth generation are used, the T-50 fighter, which belongs to the fifth generation weapons, will only begin to arrive in 2016.

      Earlier, Dmitry Rogozin said that the sixth technological structure in military affairs should lead to the creation of weapons and special military equipment that will lead to a new type of contactless war, in which there will be no military casualties, and traditional armed forces will lose their meaning.
      SOURCE: http://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2014/08/12/n_6389477.shtml
    10. Chikua
      Chikua 12 August 2014 23: 32
      +13
      The militia defeated the Right Sector. DNR. 12.08.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX
    11. just exp
      just exp 13 August 2014 07: 45
      0
      Yes, most likely they will arise where no one expects them.
  2. sergey261180
    sergey261180 12 August 2014 21: 19
    +23
    “They will be disposed of,” Biryulin told the journalist.
    Biryulin himself must be disposed of am 5 column in action.
    1. Gradus HuK
      Gradus HuK 12 August 2014 21: 23
      +4
      Hmm, we play everything in spools ((
    2. Karabin
      Karabin 12 August 2014 21: 29
      +7
      Quote: sergey261180
      Biryulin himself must utilize the 5th column in action.

      According to him, the decision to terminate the contract with Syria for the supply of complexes was made in the framework of UN sanctions by the leaders of the Russian Federation.

      So who is the fifth column?
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 12 August 2014 21: 56
        +9
        Something this (about utilization of S-300) already some time throw) I do not believe ... hi Though kill (with this rocket)))
      2. pahom54
        pahom54 12 August 2014 22: 10
        +4
        for Karabin

        There, this story is long and smelly ... It lasts from time immemorial ...
        In anticipation of the war with the Outskirts, even export complexes can be modernized to our requirements - everything will be cheaper and faster than new ones ...
      3. Normal
        Normal 12 August 2014 22: 23
        -2
        Quote: Karabin
        So who is the fifth column?


        So it is written:
        “Not we broke (contract). This decision was made in the framework of relevant UN sanctions, by political our leadership»
      4. 225chay
        225chay 12 August 2014 23: 06
        0
        Quote: Karabin
        According to him, the decision was made in the framework of UN sanctions by the leaders of the Russian Federation.
        So who is the fifth column?



        !!!!!!!))))))))) Hmm ... and there is nothing to say. From so !!
      5. GRAY
        GRAY 12 August 2014 23: 08
        +4
        Quote: Karabin
        So who is the fifth column?

        It turns out that this is the UN.
        1. Normal
          Normal 12 August 2014 23: 20
          -5
          Quote: GRAY
          It turns out that this is the UN.


          FOR ESPECIALLY GIFTED
          by decision ....our leadership
          fool
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 12 August 2014 23: 28
            -1
            Quote: Normal
            FOR ESPECIALLY GIFTED
            by decision .... of our management

            And who according to your decision is the UN Security Council within our country to implement - Vanya Zolotarev?
            "the decision to break the contract with Syria for the supply of complexes was made within the framework of UN sanctions"
            1. Normal
              Normal 13 August 2014 00: 04
              0
              Quote: GRAY
              And who according to your decision is the UN Security Council within our country to implement - Vanya Zolotarev?
              "the decision to break the contract with Syria for the supply of complexes was made within the framework of UN sanctions"


              My young friend, could you please give the very decision of the UN Security Council, which should be executed not by Vanya Zolotarev, but by the Russian leadership?

              For exceptionally gifted people, I remind you that Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council and has veto to any of its resolutions.
              Well, for general development
              UN sanctions (English UN sanctions, French Sanctions de l'ONU, Arabic عقوبات الامم المتحد, Chinese 联合国 制裁, Spanish Sanciones de la ONU) are coercive measures taken by the UN Security Council against a state (part of it territory or specifically identified persons) ....
              The decision on the application of sanctions is made UNSC Resolutions.

              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Санкции_ООН

              .....
              Regarding Syria now unilateral sanctions are imposed by the United States, the European Union and the League of Arab States. The draft Security Council resolutions on Syria, proposed three times by Western countries and rejected by Russia and China, included the threat of imposing additional sanctions against Damascus on the part of the entire international community.

              www.bbc.co.uk/russian/russia/2012/08/120831_russia_syria_sanctions.shtml

              ...
              Moscow - Russia continues to insist on blocking UN sanctions against Syria, a longtime ally and important buyer of weapons ....

              On Wednesday, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said UN approval of sanctions against Syria imposed other countrieswill become "dishonest and counterproductive."

              USA, European Union, Arab League and Turkey introduced unilateral sanctions against Damascus in response to the armed suppression of anti-government protests by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad ....

              The UN Security Council is not able to reach agreement on a resolution from the very beginning of the protests in March last year in connection with strong opposition Russia and China.

              inosmi.ru/asia/20120126/184036636.html


              It turns out that Vanya Zolotarev is you. laughing laughing laughing
  3. TOR2
    TOR2 12 August 2014 21: 19
    +15
    Would not hurry, can be very useful.
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 12 August 2014 21: 50
      +3
      Quote: TOR2
      Would not hurry, can be very useful.

      Almaz-Antey is building another plant, because it is full of orders, but they could not sell such a hat.
      1. Patton5
        Patton5 12 August 2014 22: 39
        +1
        Almaz-Antey is building another plant, because it is full of orders, but they could not sell such a hat.
        Could not sell, give !!! In DOSAAF give wink
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 12 August 2014 23: 18
        +2
        Quote: APASUS
        but here they couldn’t sell such a hat.

        Well, if it was so impatient to "sell", then we could have friends at cost. Or the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the BP to give at the residual value. Or do we have such an insurmountable object defense? that not a single Ax will fly? and one more line in the missile-dangerous direction would be in the way?
  4. gammipapa
    gammipapa 12 August 2014 21: 19
    +21
    This is not even wrecking ... no words.

    They should have given them to Ukraine, because they have a useful war for them, insanity goes through the roof.
    1. sergey261180
      sergey261180 12 August 2014 21: 24
      +10
      Quote: gammipapa
      They should have given them to Ukraine, because they have a useful war for them, insanity goes through the roof.

      Not insanity, but betrayal.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 12 August 2014 21: 37
        +12
        It seems to me that they are trolling, and this is not the first time - the same article was recently published at VO. Someone needs to bring to the public that the complexes will be disposed of. And as it will be in reality - the mystery behind seven seals. Most likely they have already found their owners somewhere. Disposal of the complexes will go to utilization.
        Well, I never believe that no one needs the S-300!
        1. sergey261180
          sergey261180 12 August 2014 22: 12
          0
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Well, I never believe that no one needs the S-300!

          Sawed and not such things. What are the cuts of "Satan", Tu-160, the sale of aircraft carriers for a penny in the 90s.
        2. 225chay
          225chay 12 August 2014 23: 09
          -2
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Well, I never believe that no one needs the S-300!


          But what about the Oka, TU-160, BZHRK, submarines, and other devices?
        3. gennady.ru
          gennady.ru 12 August 2014 23: 39
          +2
          Not so long ago, a video was shown on TV, the point is that behind our anti-aircraft systems and not only the S-300, but also close combat, the queue for 10 years is pre-painted, namely for the anti-aircraft systems. For other weapons, the line is shorter.
  5. ded100
    ded100 12 August 2014 21: 19
    +15
    But you can’t use it yourself like chtoli! In the same Crimea on combat duty am
    1. GRAY
      GRAY 12 August 2014 21: 58
      -1
      Quote: ded100
      But you can’t use it yourself like chtoli! In the same Crimea on combat duty

      I am not an expert, but I suspect that the export version of the air defense system differs from the regular one.
      They will not be used in the Russian army and not the fact that the configuration of the complex suits Syria will suit another client.
      Therefore, they are waiting for dismantlement and disposal.
    2. coolvoldik
      coolvoldik 12 August 2014 23: 36
      0
      The color is suitable. Put in the garden, and scare the raven.
  6. Wiruz
    Wiruz 12 August 2014 21: 22
    +11
    I hope that they lie to us. Either the Syrian S-300 is already in Syria (and junk will go for disposal), or there is something cooler (although nothing comes to mind). Nevertheless, I hope that Russia will not leave Syria.

    Z.Y. Follow the link - whack. Only first go to the toilet, you never know - http://warfiles.ru/show-65990-eks-ministr-oborony-ukrainy-prizyvaet-nachat-voynu
    -s-russia.html
    1. muginov2015
      muginov2015 13 August 2014 04: 11
      +1
      It is sinful to laugh at a sick person.
  7. svp67
    svp67 12 August 2014 21: 22
    +10
    Destined Syria C-300 SAMs will be recycled
    What stupidity, they didn’t find anyone to sell ... But to Iran? Thanks to Medvedev, we owe him ...
    1. dima-fesko
      dima-fesko 12 August 2014 21: 36
      +4
      Why Iran. Treaty with Belarus on a single air defense and borders
    2. thinker
      thinker 12 August 2014 22: 00
      +5
      Recently!
      Iranian ambassador: I hope that we will receive from Russia S-300 or a more modern system

      July 18, 2014and http://www.interfax.ru/386559
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. dr.star75
    dr.star75 12 August 2014 21: 23
    +10
    Of course, you need to dispose of, and in front of everyone, even collect signatures. and then where it is necessary there and send. if anything "but we don't know whose it is! we broke our own, so there is a reference ... recourse
  10. Major Yurik
    Major Yurik 12 August 2014 21: 24
    +5
    Interestingly, this biryulin, did you hear anything about conservation? fool
    1. sergey261180
      sergey261180 12 August 2014 21: 34
      +6
      Quote: Major Yurik
      Interestingly, this biryulin, did you hear anything about conservation?

      Of course I heard. Canned a couple of lemons in a Swiss savings bank. There is such a profession - to trade in the homeland!
  11. Observer2014
    Observer2014 12 August 2014 21: 24
    +12
    uh !!! Are you there that in the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation foolishly something !!!!!! or accidentally became Russian after the collapse of the USSR? but the fact that you are not Russian is a fact !!
  12. boozer
    boozer 12 August 2014 21: 24
    +2
    Did you drink it? In fact, the air defense system is a multi-layered system, you can use it yourself!
  13. Valter1364
    Valter1364 12 August 2014 21: 24
    +12
    Today they said that the roads in Russia have become a little better, but they did not say anything about fools. recourse
    1. work67
      work67 12 August 2014 21: 25
      +4
      Well, what about the property of the people to speak. They are eternal.
    2. 225chay
      225chay 12 August 2014 23: 13
      +1
      Quote: Valter1364
      They said that the roads in Russia have become a little better, but they did not say anything about fools.


      Aha! "better" ... Armenians began to build roads in Russia
    3. Nikolaitch
      Nikolaitch 13 August 2014 00: 00
      +3
      Quote: Valter1364
      Today they said that the roads in Russia have become a little better, but they did not say anything about fools. recourse


      But what is silent then ... There are plenty of them here hi The impression is that not brains but brains were going to be disposed of.
      I personally believe in my government, and this article is unknown to anyone written for the first time I see. So for now there is nothing to discuss.
  14. work67
    work67 12 August 2014 21: 24
    +2
    for what to destroy .there to transfer
  15. Drunya
    Drunya 12 August 2014 21: 25
    +7
    Give Cubans a gift. let amers potrolit.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 12 August 2014 21: 30
      +3
      Quote: Dryuya
      Give Cubans a gift. let amers potrolit.

      The Americans have the S-300, so it makes no sense ...
    2. fyodor
      fyodor 13 August 2014 00: 12
      +2
      Yes, for sure, even if it’s a present for a nominal fee, than to destroy, it’s created with the help of national (budget) money, and we are a waste, truly Russia a generous soul!
  16. Magic archer
    Magic archer 12 August 2014 21: 25
    +2
    WHY?! Is there really no demand for them?! Yes, offer them in Latin America, they will tear it off with your hands !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  17. Snake831
    Snake831 12 August 2014 21: 25
    +8
    This is some kind of nonsense. The news looks like a fake.
  18. Orik
    Orik 12 August 2014 21: 25
    +6
    laughing And putinoids shouted "set", everything is secret, therefore, on a quiet, yet another "cunning plan". At least one is there who will write that he is yap ?!
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 12 August 2014 21: 36
      +2
      Maybe they did. You never know what they say officially.
  19. Ilotan
    Ilotan 12 August 2014 21: 28
    +4
    Well, why not recycle? We don’t feel sorry for ourselves, but we’ll make new ones for ourselves, but we have nowhere to put the money.
  20. INVESTOR
    INVESTOR 12 August 2014 21: 30
    +3
    It looks like misinformation for an adversary.
  21. killganoff
    killganoff 12 August 2014 21: 31
    +9
    Iran was denied supplies, now Syria has been "thrown". How long can you listen to the office controlled by Asashay ???? For a long time the UN has not paid attention to the yapping of the Russian Foreign Ministry.
    1. 225chay
      225chay 12 August 2014 23: 16
      -5
      Quote: killganoff
      The UN has not been paying the yawn of the Russian Foreign Ministry for a long time.


      It seems that Mead is not entirely Russian ... or not at all!
  22. Yves762
    Yves762 12 August 2014 21: 31
    +1
    Recycling is a tricky word: it can be disposed of by "break and throw away", or you can "sort out and use" ...
  23. propolsky
    propolsky 12 August 2014 21: 32
    +4
    There are no buyers! Half the world dreams of such air defense! Maybe she just "threw it into the abyss"?
  24. shaman-25rus
    shaman-25rus 12 August 2014 21: 34
    +1
    read between the lines: utilize = write off balance. and unaccounted for, oh, how you need it here and there.)
  25. Second
    Second 12 August 2014 21: 35
    +15
    The spirit of Tolyan lives and conquers.
    1. raketnik
      raketnik 12 August 2014 21: 46
      +6
      do not touch the father of the Russian military furniture corruption-- HE IS HOLY, IT'S THE SAME MONUMENT ...
  26. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 August 2014 21: 36
    +3
    Yes, he made fun of the journalist. Yes ktozh such a weapon will be disposed of? Well, everyone was led like little ones.
    1. Finches
      Finches 12 August 2014 22: 10
      +1
      The namesake, if we didn’t live in Russia, but in some kind of mossy Germany, then such a statement would have been understood clearly, as though an idiotic, not appropriate, but really a joke! But here they can also dispose of us and will not blink an eye! And it will be in the order of things! Alas!
    2. VladKZ
      VladKZ 13 August 2014 01: 37
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Well, everyone was led like little ones.


      Well then, Not our little one, ask what happened to the C300, which were intended for Iran.
  27. Dezinto
    Dezinto 12 August 2014 21: 36
    +5
    In addition, the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the In addition, the
    ??
    Damn well, the good news. THERE IS SUCH A NONSENSE! Why dispose of them? What for? WHY?
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 12 August 2014 22: 38
      -10
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Damn well, the good news. THERE IS SUCH A NONSENSE! Why dispose of them? What for? WHY?

      Putin wants to hang out beautifully. So it spreads in front of everyone in a row ...
  28. kryuger.mark
    kryuger.mark 12 August 2014 21: 37
    -2
    If this is true, then the Jews did succeed.
  29. Siberian
    Siberian 12 August 2014 21: 38
    +3
    Normal equipment will not be scrapped. Most likely, their time came to rest.
  30. lexx2038
    lexx2038 12 August 2014 21: 40
    +2
    Or maybe they were not? And the money ran out - in the sense of sailed away.
  31. Dart_Veyder
    Dart_Veyder 12 August 2014 21: 42
    0
    Syria and Iran are right not to be pushed, but our closest `` allies '' are not
    they don’t really need the same Belarus ...
    At least in reserve ...
  32. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 12 August 2014 21: 43
    +6
    ... well, it would be better if they gave it to us, we would drive the Poles another stake in one place, so that they would chat less. They would have driven them out under the motive "in accordance with agreements within the framework of the Union State" and (or) within the framework of the CSTO. Even if there are early versions of the complex, they are still undergoing modernization with the replacement of the electronic filling. Another thing is that the resource of the missiles themselves is exhausted, then you can shoot at the exercises. All the same, there will be more sense than from simple destruction ...
  33. raketnik
    raketnik 12 August 2014 21: 44
    +2
    PEOPLE, my chuyka tells me something, these "utilized" complexes will still say their weighty word ... somewhere ... someday ..... and it will be so sudden and unpleasant for our partners
    1. Siberian
      Siberian 12 August 2014 21: 52
      +5
      It would not be bad if I surfaced somewhere in the right place. But dreaming is not bad bully
      1. Victor-M
        Victor-M 12 August 2014 22: 30
        +2
        Quote: Siberian
        It would not be bad if I surfaced somewhere in the right place.


        In Cuba. laughing
    2. kergudu straight
      kergudu straight 12 August 2014 22: 01
      +2
      Quote: raketnik
      PEOPLE, my chuyka tells me something, these "utilized" complexes will still say their weighty word ... somewhere ... someday ..... and it will be so sudden and unpleasant for our partners

      In Transnistria, they will roar with their roar so that the cocks do not fly in the morning
  34. b.t.a.
    b.t.a. 12 August 2014 21: 45
    +4
    Americans would have scored all sanctions and sold, and if they hadn’t sold, they would have been canned. Well, can’t we?
  35. Reserve officer
    Reserve officer 12 August 2014 21: 45
    +9
    I do not understand. Even if you follow the sanctions of the corrupt UN, then why destroy the excellent technology? No buyers found? And we, probably, have the entire territory of the country protected from the air threat, are there simply nowhere to put the C-300 complexes?
    I don’t believe in such stupidity. Most likely - disa.
    1. not main
      not main 12 August 2014 23: 47
      +1
      Quote: Reserve officer
      I don’t believe in such stupidity. Most likely - disa.

      Read the comments above. There is such a topic!
  36. Alexa77
    Alexa77 12 August 2014 21: 48
    +1
    We have not yet found whom to sell ... This probably is not to be disposed of))))
    We can recycle, but maybe not))))
    They promise not to get married)))) the more so no one promised)))
  37. Makarov
    Makarov 12 August 2014 21: 48
    0
    do not build to break, although preserving systems are probably expensive to store ...
  38. figter
    figter 12 August 2014 21: 48
    +6
    C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems

    Correctly say: anti-aircraft missile systems!
    And if at all right, then: S-300 anti-aircraft missile system (B, VM, P, PS, PM, PMU ...).
    If those in the photo were to be handed over to Syria, then these are BU-shnye, taken off duty. Apparently they worked their way. It is unprofitable to preserve and store them. Such old equipment is either sold and works for a long time until it is completely abandoned on combat duty almost without turning off, or, after being removed from storage, it becomes a machine for continuous repair and adjustment work with damp equipment.
    It is more profitable to use it for spare parts for those machines that are still on duty. They are also old and the equipment may fail, and its release at the plants is discontinued in favor of C-400..500.
  39. sabakina
    sabakina 12 August 2014 21: 49
    +11
    We have an "empty" sky in Kostroma. There was a regiment of helicopter pilots, and then they dispersed. BZHRK-liquidated (and the station. "Daisy was so beautiful). And we are not Moscow, we have no nuclear umbrella.
    R.S. I just hope for the wisdom of leadership ...
    1. smith7
      smith7 12 August 2014 23: 08
      +4
      Do not worry! Everything will be fine with the Kostroma sky. And do not feel sorry for these S-300s, we have no need to regret such "good". I think these are machines produced for a long time, not subject to modernization, with exhausted resources of electronics and mechanics, restoration and deployment on alert will not cost cheap, created specifically for the requirements of a foreign customer ... But are there any reasons? The reasons for the disposal are highly justified. Do not doubt. I have no doubt, since I have a great idea of ​​what it is like to write off military property for scrap. The reason may be political ... But now is not the time. I firmly believe - this is not a betrayal. The details of the problem are important here, but we were not told. Yes, and this infa from the "krasnobaev" white-tape-swamp echo of Moscow ..
  40. korablik
    korablik 12 August 2014 21: 49
    +5
    Who will dispose of the PRODUCT? Probably the journalist spoke with the military specialist in different languages, and then wrote an article through a translator. The qualification of our journalists in military topics raises some doubts, especially if journalist - blonde.
  41. faterdom
    faterdom 12 August 2014 21: 55
    +5
    Just a man decided to recall a topic about which our wise leadership forgot about current affairs. Moreover, under Serdyukov, all current affairs, except for the sale of land and the Puzikov radar station near Anapa, went under the hood and were safely forgotten.
    I understand that Serdyukov didn’t work with the ROE, but there, it seems, the personnel didn’t work out better.
    So in vain did they nominate the article, Respect to the peasant for reminding ... Both Syria on the spot and Iran, we cut off the same 300 at one time, having joined other people's sanctions. So there is much to be done, if you think about it.
  42. Severomor
    Severomor 12 August 2014 21: 57
    +3
    Yeah, if the second Russian problem with a creak, in some places, in places and not everywhere is solved (I'm talking about roads), then the first somehow stalled.
  43. 333312
    333312 12 August 2014 21: 59
    +2
    angry angry I'm sick of why our money is flying out again, do I have the impression that Biryulin is either mishandled or stupid?
  44. xomaNN
    xomaNN 12 August 2014 22: 00
    +3
    Is it possible to repeat stupidity with the destruction of normal combat complexes? The Yankees, under a bilateral agreement, did not detonate their missiles like us, but partially laid them in storage arsenals. Strange, and Serdyukov seems to be no longer in the Ministry of Defense, but the same decisions are voiced smile
  45. olf_1959
    olf_1959 12 August 2014 22: 04
    +2
    Under Stalin, this utilizer would have been leaned against the wall.
  46. Sinbad
    Sinbad 12 August 2014 22: 05
    +3
    So this is where the enemies have dug in (internal). It was not enough for us to have "hump" with EBN so no, dispose of again! No, put it in storage, you see, it will come in handy. There is no extra weaponry, there is a shortage of it.
  47. prishelec
    prishelec 12 August 2014 22: 08
    +4
    What always infuriates me is that, for example, Amer petriots are standing in Jordan, but we don’t see it possible for us to deliver our S-300s to Syria or to another country am
  48. Saratoga833
    Saratoga833 12 August 2014 22: 09
    +5
    Dispose of the S-300? I have some questions. What is this stupidity? Stupidity? Betrayal? Or maybe all together? And who will answer for this?
    1. figter
      figter 13 August 2014 15: 35
      0
      This technique has been around for thirty years. You, for example, are watching television thirty years ago. Not! Because it hardly works normally. Why do you want to put on combat duty equipment that will be screwed at any moment.
  49. Sasha75
    Sasha75 12 August 2014 22: 09
    +2
    SO pests bought by the West are not shot by anyone, you all perfectly understand that it’s easier for some official to give 100t or 1 lam of paper to ruin any normal idea.
  50. Megatron
    Megatron 12 August 2014 22: 11
    +4
    Smacks of treason. In vain the phrase "enemies of the people" was removed from everyday life.