Military Review

Jen Psaki: Banning Western Agricultural Products from Importing Russia Contains a Potential Threat to US National Security

174
During the next briefing, US State Department spokesman Jen Psaki touched on the food embargo that Russia imposed on American goods.

Jen Psaki: Banning Western Agricultural Products from Importing Russia Contains a Potential Threat to US National Security


“The sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products may lead to the strengthening of the position of agricultural producers in Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural market in Russia can be a potential threat to the national security of the United States, ”she said. SAKHAPRESS.RU.

The Russian ban also worries the European Union, which is about to start negotiations with Latin American countries, in particular, Chile and Brazil, in order to dissuade them from supplying agricultural products to the Russian market, reports RIA "News" with reference to Financial Times.

“We will talk with countries that could potentially replace our exports, to indicate to them that we expect them not to profit from the current situation,” the EU representative said during a briefing on Ukraine.

According to him, some companies may conclude new contracts with Russia, however, it will be difficult to “find an excuse” for countries chasing diplomatic initiatives to take the place of the EU, Australia, USA and Norway.

However, according to another EU official, the upcoming talks will have an exclusively political nature, in particular, the situation in Ukraine will be discussed, and not the supply of food products to Russia.
Photos used:
http://www.sakhapress.ru/
174 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kingnothing
    kingnothing 12 August 2014 07: 35
    +72
    Yes, they will persuade them not to take their place in the import. What is there to offer such that they abandon our market? I feel they can start planting democracy in Latin America.
    1. Hammer
      Hammer 12 August 2014 07: 37
      +70
      "Jen Psaki: Banning Western Agricultural Products from Importing Russia Contains a Potential Threat to US National Security"- and thank God! Actually, for what they fought (gentlemen mattress) and ran into it! And rightly so! bully
      1. Момент
        Момент 12 August 2014 07: 40
        +25
        Interestingly, Latin America will again be led by the EU and America?
        But Russia is not as simple as it seemed at first glance.
        Let them move the gyrus further, maybe the benefit will be.
        1. Hippopotamus
          Hippopotamus 12 August 2014 07: 42
          +43
          loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may pose a potential threat to US national security

          In the course of quite crazy woman! If there were more such idiots to the State Department, you look - and you won’t have to fight.

          “We will talk with countries that could potentially replace our exports, to indicate to them that we expect them not to profit from the current situation,” the EU representative said during a briefing on Ukraine.

          - And your mug will not crack, Mr. "good" !?

          Spiders ran in - so everything is done right!
          1. Bodrov
            Bodrov 12 August 2014 07: 46
            +67
            Quote: Hippo
            In the course of quite crazy woman! If there were more such idiots to the State Department, you look - and you won’t have to fight.
            1. Wedmak
              Wedmak 12 August 2014 08: 57
              +17
              "Find me ... the Belarusian sea ?!"
              What, the fleet is stuck in the Belarusian forests? For a small fee, Belarusians on belazes will be pulled out by your aircraft carriers, in parts it’s true ... laughing
              1. Tersky
                Tersky 12 August 2014 09: 04
                +7
                Quote: Wedmak
                "Find me ... the Belarusian sea ?!"

                do not distract ... she is studying the map of Russia which Valuev adjusted to her with the caption "I will examine myself on the lawn of the White House"
                1. Wedmak
                  Wedmak 12 August 2014 09: 15
                  +1
                  she is studying the map of Russia which Valuev fitted her with the caption "I will examine myself on the lawn of the White House."

                  I'm afraid we won’t live up to the exam because of old age. Psaki will get stuck somewhere off the coast of Portugal ... or Japan, depending on which side he starts looking.
              2. And Us Rat
                And Us Rat 12 August 2014 09: 53
                +41
                Quote: Wedmak
                "Find me ... the Belarusian sea ?!"
                What, the fleet is stuck in the Belarusian forests? For a small fee, Belarusians on belazes will be pulled out by your aircraft carriers, in parts it’s true ... laughing

              3. dzau
                dzau 13 August 2014 22: 53
                +2
                Quote: Wedmak
                "Find me ... the Belarusian sea ?!"
                What, the fleet is stuck in the Belarusian forests? For a small fee, Belarusians on belazes will be pulled out by your aircraft carriers, in parts it’s true ... laughing

                If they are not torpedoed by a Ukrainian submarine.
            2. 222222
              222222 12 August 2014 12: 55
              +2
              Who would ask psaki: "How does she understand the US national interests ??"
              ..the answer is obvious .. digging in my papers for five minutes and making a clever expression .. "I haven’t written anything about it .. I’ll go ask .. and then I’ll inform you."
              1. kostiknet
                kostiknet 14 August 2014 14: 42
                +1
                Quote: 222222
                I'll go and ask .. and then I'll let you know "..

                Psaki often happens the other way around - at first he will soak something up, and then he runs with the question: Why did I say that the whole World is laughing? laughing
            3. Evilcat
              Evilcat 12 August 2014 14: 12
              +1
              I wonder who more pinned? Over Psaki or Belarusians? They, by the way, call their Zaslavsky reservoir the Minsk Sea. I do not know if there is a navy on it.
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 12 August 2014 14: 39
                +1
                Anyway, Psaki would still be on Issyk-Kul (there under the USSR torpedoes were tested if that wink ) The 6th Fleet would send ... I would look at it ...
          2. Kolya
            Kolya 12 August 2014 08: 43
            +11
            When Americans talk about a potential threat to national security, they usually start a war. At the same time, they argue the war as a potential threat to national security. This became the official norm of American foreign policy after 9/11. How to understand the statement Psaki drawing parallels? That is, is this a direct threat? Or is she again blurting something wrong?
          3. avg
            avg 12 August 2014 08: 46
            +10
            Jen Psaki: Banning Western Agricultural Products from Importing Russia Contains a Potential Threat to US National Security

            Lord, how are you still alive, poor fellow. Is there anything on our planet that does not threaten the security of the Indian subcontinent, and wherever you try to stick your snout? what
            it will be difficult to “justify” countries pursuing diplomatic initiatives to take the place of the EU, Australia, USA and Norway.

            But what, they’re the chief and the humanists, and they don’t understand that most of the people in the world are better undernourished, but they will make an extra facet about the office. laughing
          4. Finches
            Finches 12 August 2014 09: 24
            +5
            Not! The monkey with the grenade is scary, and the idiots with the nuclear button do not inspire at all laughing !
          5. Evilcat
            Evilcat 12 August 2014 14: 06
            +4
            Really insolent. Are you going to dictate to your potential bailiff on what conditions will he do it? Kharya should crack both up and down.
        2. Sunjar
          Sunjar 12 August 2014 07: 56
          +7
          Quote: Abroad which will help us
          “We will talk with countries that could potentially replace our exports to indicate that we expect them to not profit from this situation”


          Wow-hu-hu-hu ... They call for conscience and "justice" in the European sense)))

          What kind of creatures? BUT? So we will impose sanctions on you, we will undermine the economy, and you must do as we say. But on those bite, here is the answer. Bliiiiiin, but for what? Hey hey hey guys don't help these Russians. Of course, you’ll get warm at this, but it’s somehow intolerant.

          Quote: All the same abroad which will help us
          However, according to another EU official, the upcoming negotiations will be exclusively political in nature, in particular, the situation in Ukraine will be discussed.


          Does he mean pro support for the fascists? Yes, although this evil spirits and so helps everyone who is against Russia rushing.
        3. aksakal
          aksakal 12 August 2014 08: 31
          +18
          Quote: Moment
          Interestingly, Latin America will again be taken by the EU and America? And Russia is not as simple as it seemed at first glance.

          - and after all, Putin has a real opportunity in Latin America to bend England toughly, if she really yaps at Russia very strongly, echoing the United States. This is Argentina and its age-old dream to return the islands that are called Malvinas - what they are called there in Galician is of little interest to me. They are still not English, but were occupied by the British. At first, very young, but already very aggressive USA took and simply occupied these islands, Argentina, due to its weakness, turned to England for help. Well, it's like asking for a goat in the garden with cabbage. Moreover, England will become silk even from the moment of the signing of a memorandum on preferential military-technical cooperation between Russia and Argentina, when Argentina plans to supply Yakhont-type missile defense systems, Russian-Indian Brahmos, several modern submarines of the Varshavyanka or Kilo type. , several corvettes, sea-based aircraft and modern fighters. To envisage all this mass in deliveries on soft terms - and that's it, England itself will become Russia's lawyer in the West, will call on to recognize Crimea as Russia and recognize New Russia. It's real, it's just that Putin hasn't even used really powerful things, he hasn't stepped on his favorite calluses. I like how unhurried he is, with such direct relish he is gradually approaching their painful moments. England will not understand - the turn will come to its dubious islands. The United States is not doing well with Grenada and especially with Panama. In general, quietly and without haste, you can arrange responses similar to the Ukrainian problem and the aggressors. How is it heated, why rush? The current strengthening of contacts with Latin countries in the field of food - and this is because lard dollars in total, if they do not make Latin people rich, will have a noticeable effect on their economic condition, which will increase their already high anti-American sentiments, increase economic power, and through it - and strengthening the armed forces. Well, there it is already possible to smoothly approach the Malvinas question, if by that moment the fool-England does not understand what's what in this world.
          1. persei
            persei 14 August 2014 21: 28
            0
            it would be much more intelligible from a modern naval base for our nuclear submarines in Cuba
        4. Caa
          Caa 12 August 2014 09: 31
          +6
          Interestingly, Latin America will again be led by the EU and America?


          This will be their first little check. I think that someone will definitely drop out. But, better now than later. In general, the statement of the question by the EU itself is enchanting arrogance.
        5. Foxmara
          Foxmara 15 August 2014 09: 20
          0
          Nah, Putin will give a charm, even play a kind of slaughter, and what kind of woman will exchange our judoka for an African-American image, a falling rating which even the local media can’t support?
      2. atalef
        atalef 12 August 2014 07: 52
        -8
        Quote: Hammer
        "Jen Psaki: Banning Western Agricultural Products from Importing Russia Contains a Potential Threat to US National Security"- and thank God! Actually, for what they fought (gentlemen mattress) and ran into it! And rightly so! bully

        yes, ok - filter the news a little bit
        Article full fake. There is no reference to the original. Continuous reposts.
        So sites like - Press are gaining traffic and grandmas respectively
        Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.
        Nothing to say.
        Well, learn to distinguish between more or less truthful news from outright lies.
        1. atalef
          atalef 12 August 2014 08: 11
          +6
          Well minus - that’s all the heroes. And who can comment? Or can I get a link to the original? laughing
          1. O_RUS
            O_RUS 12 August 2014 08: 23
            +5
            Quote: atalef
            Well minus - that’s all the heroes.


            From me to you plus hi

            Unfortunately, I cannot find an article that says that after the introduction of sanctions, mattress toppers increased the market with Russia (European countries adhere to sanctions, and mattress toppers take their "place" in the world market)
          2. Tuzik
            Tuzik 12 August 2014 08: 30
            +6
            and nothing is said about their export) they are talking about control over Russia, because this is Russia's first step out of world control (order), because when the USSR collapsed, we were specifically indicated (through Yeltsin) our place in the world is raw materials, and agricultural, and industry quickly strangled. buy equipment only from these countries, products only from these countries, but do not even think to trade with these.
            so even if it’s fake, it doesn’t mean that the world government is not concerned)
          3. bmv04636
            bmv04636 12 August 2014 08: 47
            0
            May I ask. It is true that in the United States it is forbidden to grow vegetables in personal plots, and marijuana is possible.
          4. alicante11
            alicante11 12 August 2014 10: 16
            +2
            Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.


            Here is a strange person. For shelling the territory you arrange bombing of Syria. And here for the fact that as much as 1% spoiled the business, so generally tear everyone around.
            But seriously, the point is, in principle, that someone decided on counter-sanctions against the West. Previously, everyone endured, but now there is someone who gave the answer. So you are mad.
        2. vrach
          vrach 12 August 2014 08: 23
          +4
          Dear Atalef, the dialogue is thought up. But unfortunately, to be observant in the USA there are a lot of funny laws that can have very funny consequences. I am at work and I do not have time to look for all this for you. THE PROBLEM IN THAT THIS IS REALLY TRUE as it is in reality, and they are anecdotes from life.
          After the announcement that any humanitarian mission from Russia to Ukraine will be seen as an invasion, IT IS NOW ALSO TRUE. Well, let it be exclusively for you that it will be an Aesopian (Aesop ancient Greek philosopher) truth.
          And I didn’t set you a minus.
        3. andj61
          andj61 12 August 2014 08: 28
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.
          Nothing to say.

          Everything is right - for the USA it is like a crumbling elephant. But, nevertheless, I remember very well how many US officials right up to the president simply dodged, demanding the repeal of Russian law regarding the prohibition of chlorine processing of poultry products (Bush legs). Then there was noise too - wow! Ours then resisted, the processing of the legs has changed. And the price of the issue is very miserable. It's just that the United States is very sensitive to any reduction in the sales market that did not occur on their initiative.
          Regarding the unreliability of the source - I fully support it.
          1. atalef
            atalef 12 August 2014 08: 33
            +7
            Quote: andj61
            Everything is right - for the USA it is - that the elephant has a shot

            Andrey, Greetings!
            Let's go back to our sheep
            I believe that such a popular and respected site as VO should not release such outright fakes like this article.
            With VO there are also links and reposts - and the presence of a link to VO adds some sort of weight to the text itself.
            And then frank lies.
            Do not stoop to the level of the yellow press and OBS hi
            1. andj61
              andj61 12 August 2014 08: 48
              +4
              Greetings, Alexander! Totally agree with you!
            2. alicante11
              alicante11 12 August 2014 10: 19
              +1
              I believe that such a popular and respected site as VO should not release such outright fakes like this article.


              And I think that such a respected site as VO can laugh. Well, our western "gentlemen" like you will not let us suddenly believe that this is just a joke.
              However, we all know that in every joke there is only a fraction of the joke.
          2. persei
            persei 14 August 2014 21: 33
            +3
            The US is not concerned about our counter-sanctions, but about the fact that Russia will be self-sufficient, will begin to develop its agricultural sector ...
            may lead to the strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security. ”
        4. Armin
          Armin 12 August 2014 08: 37
          +8
          Quote: atalef
          Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.

          And no one says that it is precisely the refusal of US exports to Russia of less than 1% that is a threat to the US

          A sharp decline in Western agricultural imports could lead to strengthening the position of agricultural producers in Russia.

          That's what the USA cares about. Do you think that America is indifferent to strengthening the position of agricultural producers within a hostile country?
        5. AleksUkr
          AleksUkr 12 August 2014 08: 42
          +5
          Quote: atalef
          Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.
          Nothing to say.
          Well, learn to distinguish between more or less truthful news from outright lies.


          "Mr." is the smartest!. It's not about deliveries from the USA. Try to analyze the situation a little and find the right answer ...
        6. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 12 August 2014 08: 48
          +2
          Quote: atalef
          Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.

          I will not minus, but it's not just direct profit. A large percentage of imported food helps to influence a certain country, this is a common truth, therefore "food security" is not an empty phrase. Note our banned the import of those products that can be replaced by supplies from other countries or to raise production at home. Of course, we are talking about food not only for the United States, but also for the rest of those who fell under the sanctions. In this context, the United States identifies itself with the rest of the West.
        7. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 12 August 2014 08: 52
          +3
          Quote: atalef
          yes, ok - filter the news a little bit
          Article full fake. There is no reference to the original. Continuous reposts.

          Sanya, according to the news, she was already shown in the morning with this speech. Look better, otherwise tomorrow she will push the new pearl, which will eclipse everything else hi
        8. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 12 August 2014 09: 06
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          Russia less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.

          and the danger is not this, but that Russia can get off the needle of importing food products.
          the main reason why the states refused at one time an attack on the Union is not the ability to destroy the food base in one hit
          1. And Us Rat
            And Us Rat 12 August 2014 09: 50
            +6
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            Quote: atalef
            Russia less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.

            and the danger is not this, but that Russia can get off the needle of importing food products.
            the main reason why the states refused at one time an attack on the Union is not the ability to destroy the food base in one hit

        9. volcano
          volcano 12 August 2014 09: 45
          +9
          Quote: atalef
          Exports of agricultural products from the United States to Russia are less than 1% of total US agricultural exports.

          This does not mean anything. Psaki talks about the West. And by the way, she’s right. Refusal of western agricultural products gives impetus to improving the food security of the Russian Federation. And this is very bad for the USA. Any rejection of any kind of dependence on the West is to strengthen the security of Russia. Does Amer need it? That's nervous.

          Little of. Of course, I would really like to make a mistake, but I began to get the feeling that in general all these events are the essence of a very BIG GAME of GDP. And the result of this game is not Ukraine at all. The result of this game is the maximum consolidation within Russia and the most important increase in the level of import substitution ... that is, GDP for a quiet type of sanction ... for ... for ... poplar ... cuts the ropes with which Russia managed to bind itself to the West for 23 years. .. And the people that the main thing with understanding refers to this .... And imagine that everything is smooth in the world, and Putin suddenly the West went out of our market ... Even the patriots would not understand him .... And now. ... all gut ..

          And most importantly ... I am afraid that these steps hint to us that the war is close ... It is on the verge ... Too many factors indicate that the country's leadership is preparing for war .... Here you also have rearmament ( very significant), Here and the intensification of work on civil defense and emergency situations ... the troops are constantly training ... Now here is the rejection of Western food, which will stimulate its producers ... An active search for allies ... Minimizing the dependence of the military-industrial complex on foreign supplies, etc. .d. This is very reminiscent of the events "in the period of the growing military threat."
          And I think that the Management believes that in the next maximum 10 years there will be a big war .. Most likely earlier .. And this will be the last war on this planet .... And then .... and then the paragraph ..
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 12 August 2014 09: 54
            +4
            I agree, we are on the verge of a big turning point. The truth about the big war, I would not speak so clearly. Most likely several foci of collisions, mutual tension, provocations, etc. The United States simply has nothing to fight with us. The regrouping of large forces into Europe cannot be carried out quickly and covertly. This will raise questions. The EU itself will not get into the war, since its strength will not be enough even for a combined arms operation.
            Nuclear forces are the last argument. And it will be applied .. well, let's say, with the last gasp. This is me about the USA.
            1. aksakal
              aksakal 12 August 2014 10: 40
              +4
              Quote: Wedmak
              True about the great war, I would not speak so clearly. Most likely several foci of collisions, mutual tension, provocations

              Let's start in a circle, counterclockwise - the Arctic, you can set Canadians and Norwegians on Russia.
              Next - Pytalovsky district. It’s ridiculous, of course, but the Balts are seriously preparing to repulse him. Next is Ukraine. There are no comments, and so it is clear. Next is Transnistria. The United States began to pressure Russia. to remove the peacekeepers. Next is Karabakh. So far, Putin has managed to dampen what the Americans warmed up there. Further - in Central Asia - that Ferghana junction, the danger of Afghan expansion, the water issue, etc.
              Syria is still relevant. Such are the pies. How and what to extinguish is a question. And in general, are you tired of living under siege? Defend, extinguish thrown firebrands, etc. Really, you need to be Uzbek for the first reason. There are two ways. The first is to accuse the US of fomenting conflicts directly and directly with it. The second is to heat up fires in the same way a little south of the United States, in Nicaragua, in Panama, stir up in Mexico ... Well, this is much more difficult. Russia has good special services, but they are more focused on the security of Russia, and the organization of "colored fireworks" from third countries - here it has little experience, and it is possible to lose with a crash to the CIA. Therefore, the exit from the "besieged fortress" is only according to the first option - directing charges against the United States of inciting conflicts in the regions around Russia and issuing an ultimatum to stop them within a certain period. further - a big war.
              In general, there are only two options - blazing around Russia, it extinguishes something, something flares up again at this time, or a big conflict with the United States. I would prefer a big conflict with the United States. Strange as it may seem, the hysteria that the United States itself instilled in relation to the Russians, such as the "evil empire", had an effect in such a way that the direct American soldiers really do not want to fight the Russians. Either they panic when even an outdated Russian SU-24 bomber dive into a US Navy ship, then fly away into Russian airspace in panic, then immediately stop flying as soon as the SU-27 shows its "belly" full of missiles ... Therefore right now, you can take advantage of the fact that the amerians are colic afraid of the Russians, and play on this.
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 12 August 2014 10: 51
                +8
                Do you not consider the third option - economic war? We can easily strike at the Americans by simply cutting off the supply of engines and titanium, cutting off all economic ties and to dip. level announce the unilateral termination of any contracts with the United States. Drive out all American companies, break contracts, close all pro-American offices. In the end, give up the dollar.
                Of course, we will lose some goods, but the USA will not be sweet. It is only necessary to wrap the strength of the United States in its weakness. Americans have always been able to sit overseas; partial isolation was their salvation from war. It can be turned against them. These oceans can become a fence for all countries from the United States.
                1. Dikson
                  Dikson 14 August 2014 16: 29
                  0
                  The USSR lost the economic war to the USA .. Russia will lose all the more in such a duel. And now everything goes to the fact that the Americans are going to sit for the third time overseas and cut the dough in the war .. And that’s why it is useless to threaten Poland or some other Lithuania with France .. - you must specifically tell the states - or you are leaving our borders , or we will .. leave at your place ...
              2. zzz
                zzz 12 August 2014 12: 40
                +1
                Quote: aksakal
                I would prefer a big conflict with the United States. Strange as it may seem, the hysteria that the United States itself instilled in relation to the Russians, such as the "evil empire", had an effect in such a way that the direct American soldiers really do not want to fight the Russians.


                While the United States will remain in the same form on the planet-Russia, there will be no peace. Therefore, I think that many here share your idea.
              3. persei
                persei 14 August 2014 21: 37
                0
                then it is necessary to "warm up" the contradictions that the US has with the countries of Latin America, in Asia ... And to fight with the US ... NATO ... is absurd ...
        10. INVESTOR
          INVESTOR 12 August 2014 10: 41
          0
          In chicken, 50 percent, Yandex to help you.
        11. wbigfire
          wbigfire 14 August 2014 17: 48
          +1
          Atalef, according to Psaki, the US national security threat is not posed by the Russian ban on food imports from the US, the EU, etc., but the ability of Russia to ensure its own food security against this background. As a result, to get out of US control in this matter. This is what infuriates them!
      3. 225chay
        225chay 12 August 2014 09: 19
        0
        Quote: Hammer
        "Jen Psaki: Banning the import of Western agricultural products to Russia poses a potential threat to US national security" -


        Psaki is probably the most beautiful and smart lady of the State Department ...)
      4. Duke
        Duke 12 August 2014 11: 05
        +1
        “A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products may lead to the strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security. ”

        Our manufacturer, this is a threat to US national security. It's great.
    2. Verdent
      Verdent 12 August 2014 07: 39
      +10
      It sounds like this in diplomatic language, "to persuade", everyone knows how it will actually be, it became clear even at the UN voting on Crimea, when representatives of some countries approached Lavrov and openly said that they were threatened with economic consequences if they did not will support the West.
      1. Scandinavian
        Scandinavian 12 August 2014 08: 21
        +5
        GIVE ME A GUN, I WILL SHOOT IT wassat
        1. ALABAY45
          ALABAY45 12 August 2014 08: 34
          0
          I will participate! From the "leather pistol" ... to the head, so that she would shut up at least for a while!
        2. andj61
          andj61 12 August 2014 08: 35
          +3
          Quote: Scandinavian
          GIVE ME A GUN, I WILL SHOOT IT wassat

          "- Yes! - whispered Ostap. - We hope to hit the enemy with your help. I'll give you parabellum!
        3. AleksUkr
          AleksUkr 12 August 2014 08: 47
          +8
          Quote: Scandinavian
          GIVE ME A GUN, I WILL SHOOT IT


          What for? Who will make us laugh? Yes, and Zadornov’s correct words about stupid Americans for some of our citizens need to be confirmed with something.
        4. alex_78
          alex_78 14 August 2014 22: 55
          0
          Hand it out to everyone. Oh, frolic ... wassat
    3. ECT
      ECT 12 August 2014 07: 39
      +4
      Yes, in general, this psaki. Soon, the study of the history of the Russian Federation at school will be recognized as a threat to US national security. When the United States falls apart, the main thing for Zadornov not to miss it, will cut the loot without doing anything, it will only enter the stage the whole hall will lie.
    4. subbtin.725
      subbtin.725 12 August 2014 07: 47
      +4

      However, according to another EU official, the upcoming talks will have an exclusively political nature, in particular, the situation in Ukraine will be discussed, and not the supply of food products to Russia.

      Again they will procrastinate: how impudent Russia, how dare it, after all, introducing sanctions is our prerogative. Our president washed them and these are just flowers; you can see the berries in the vaults as well. Even if this is improvisation, it’s nice to have power , because, this is the answer of a sovereign state. Bravo GDP! Vivat Russia!
    5. SVT
      SVT 12 August 2014 07: 55
      +3
      I wonder if there are those in Latin America who, for the sake of the West, will abandon the development of their agriculture at the expense of a new market? if so, then we must remember the beginning of the 20th century, when the Brazilian and Argentine meat producers were similar to modern oil sheikhs in terms of income and influence on politics, so I think the unrest in L.A. in case of refusal to import, tell a simple farmer that due to the fact that the burgher in Germany cannot repay the loan, because of the refusal of the Russian Federation to import them, don Pedros will refuse without additional earnings ...
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 12 August 2014 08: 12
        +4
        Quote: Svt
        I wonder if there are those in Latin America who, for the sake of the West, will abandon the development of their agriculture at the expense of a new market?

        I think that it’s not just that the GDP spent its voyage on L.A. already agreed, and then announced sanctions. So the US can only bite off ... everything is already agreed.
    6. armageddon
      armageddon 12 August 2014 07: 58
      +1
      Hmm ... For what they fought ... On that and ran !!! A flag in their teeth !!! Let them now have a headache !!!
      1. AleksUkr
        AleksUkr 12 August 2014 08: 51
        0
        Quote: Armagedon
        Let them now have a headache !!!


        They are too worried. They think that they are the smartest. Advice to a tanned man:
    7. Giant thought
      Giant thought 12 August 2014 08: 02
      +2
      The EU has sung an old song, who, not dreaming, is against us, will try to twist the hands of Latin American countries, let's see what happens.
    8. Wels75
      Wels75 12 August 2014 08: 17
      +4
      Show mast go he !!! All the same, old Jane is not an Uzbek!
    9. Wels75
      Wels75 12 August 2014 08: 19
      +1
      Favorite toy!!!
      1. alex_78
        alex_78 14 August 2014 22: 53
        0
        They finish the game ...
    10. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 August 2014 08: 51
      0
      The State Department has allocated 500 bucks to train this fool. I don’t know how much education costs in the USA, but I think a lot of people can be trained with this money.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 12 August 2014 09: 03
        +1
        Can she just be taught at our school? Let's start the class from the 5th!
    11. max702
      max702 12 August 2014 10: 49
      +1
      It’s interesting, and if boats from countries of the US and the EU that did not obey the councils suddenly start to sink. What will we do? They’ll tell us that they’re drowning, it’s not clear why .. Here insurers (Lloyd) will unscrew the price tag, and yes, pirates from Somalia in the Atlantic and draw in other places .. What will we do? Personally, I have one idea to grow everything by ourselves without hoping for anyone.
      1. kartalovkolya
        kartalovkolya 14 August 2014 07: 15
        0
        Well, you "charged" you my friend! Yes, for such cases, the right to hang on yards has not been canceled, it will be pure piracy. To go for this you need to be one hundred percent sure that it will not "arrive" in the return line. Well, this is so by the way, but what is especially surprising and amusing so it is the concern of everyone there Psak and others about the strengthening of food security in Russia, she is a complete fool to teach us what and how to do! After all, we didn’t teach them to impose sanctions against us, so let them suck it off in full. And let them themselves eat their GMO shit, well, they can still treat their Ukrainian friends! "Where is this Hippolyte (US ambassador), something has not been seen for a long time" First, "Irony of fate ...", and a little later they will receive "... with light steam"! It's time the guys in response to their "velvet" revolution arrange for them (USA) "Vatnikovuyu" revolution and see whose .... thicker!
    12. izGOI
      izGOI 14 August 2014 15: 43
      0
      Quote: kingnothing
      I feel they can start planting democracy in Latin America.

      Democracy can be implanted, of course, but .... Even in South America this is not done in one day. And time is just not enough. Especially now, when Latinos are not what they were, and the mattress covers are not the same. A classic revolutionary situation, with "top and bottom"
    13. gray
      gray 14 August 2014 18: 10
      0
      Not enough for everyone (democracy), navel will be torn.
    14. Rarahin
      Rarahin 15 August 2014 00: 17
      0
      Yes, we have already begun. It is unlikely that the death of Eduard Kampush is an accident.
    15. Vlad Peel
      Vlad Peel 15 August 2014 03: 01
      0
      In Latin America, the people of war will not succumb to persuasion. And even if the EU lifts sanctions, and even asks for forgiveness, and has already begun, the agreements of Russia with new suppliers of agricultural products will work and the EU will probably only be able to get into our market in five years, and lower prices to attract us . But I, gentlemen, I’ll tell you, Argentinean beef is very good, I worked with it, and if Argentina can keep the right price, then the EU will not break through to us (in terms of beef)
  2. Balamyt
    Balamyt 12 August 2014 07: 35
    +15
    Oh my God! Something started! Begin to move away from hysteria or something ???
    Time heals!
    USA is the world leader in exporting velvet revolutions.
    Middle East Jihad Export.
    Europe on the export of homosexuality.
    China export counterfeit.
    Central America and Afghanistan on the export of dope
    And we are offered to be leaders in the import of all this D.E.R.L.M.A. so what ????
  3. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 12 August 2014 07: 35
    +4
    Yeah, American democracy in the fields of Donbass also brings a lot of things.
  4. VICTOR-61
    VICTOR-61 12 August 2014 07: 35
    +1
    Americans are twitching and the EU is losing markets the way you need it
  5. mamont5
    mamont5 12 August 2014 07: 36
    +11
    “A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products may lead to the strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security. ”

    What a clever girl! And everyone (and myself included) on her: "Fool, fool." And she, for once, told the TRUTH. Well, not all the same the United States threaten the national security of other countries. You also need to feel for yourself what IT is.

    "The European Union, which is going to start negotiations with the countries of Latin America, in particular, Chile and Brazil, in order to dissuade them from supplying agricultural products to the Russian market"

    Well well. Got it. Previously, it was necessary to think with whom to be friends and where to go.
    1. 102030dvs
      102030dvs 12 August 2014 07: 54
      +2
      Mistress Europe, you are ruled by a black Obama ....,
      You have at least a little bit of human dignity, Human Honor
    2. draft
      draft 12 August 2014 07: 56
      +5
      Paraphrasing (or rather removing too much) her words can be obtained:
      «... strengthening the position of agricultural producers within Russia ... poses a potential threat to US national security».
      Those. it turns out that any good initiative within Russia, any success of it is a threat to US security. So they will make every effort to prevent such threats.
      Conclusion - the Yellowstone volcano would wake up soon.
  6. alexandr-budarin1
    alexandr-budarin1 12 August 2014 07: 36
    +4
    Well, HYSTERICA has begun .. And even a week has not passed! Eat, eat "apples against Putin" good
    1. Balamyt
      Balamyt 12 August 2014 08: 28
      +1
      eat "apples against Putin"

      And after that, maybe even with diarrhea, dope through the ass will come out!
  7. dima67
    dima67 12 August 2014 07: 36
    0
    Fussed when the smell of fried!
  8. iiggi
    iiggi 12 August 2014 07: 37
    +3
    Every "carrot" grown outside of its territory is a potential threat to the United States. Now, apparently, a new round of the Cold War will begin, which in the future will be called the fruit and vegetable war, under the wing of Bush's legs. Once you have to think that for your sanctions you will receive your share of lyulya, it's even surprising that such a "genius" representative of the State Department, as Psaki, also understood this wink
  9. yustas
    yustas 12 August 2014 07: 37
    +1
    Let the hounds go to the place where the dogs go
  10. father nikon
    father nikon 12 August 2014 07: 37
    +2
    Come on "beauty", anneal in full, in the rating of Russian clowns and comedians you are the first lol
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Metlik
    Metlik 12 August 2014 07: 38
    +3
    The European Union, which is about to start negotiations with Latin American countries, in particular Chile and Brazil, to dissuade them from delivering agricultural products to the Russian market


    What does Europe want to convince Latin America of? That she can deliver products to the Russian Federation, but Brazil and Chile not? Come on, let's convince.
    1. father nikon
      father nikon 12 August 2014 08: 17
      +2
      Latin American countries were only looking for opportunities to move away from the dictatorship of the United States, but here Russia offers such prospects. Go "talk them out" now!
  13. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 12 August 2014 07: 38
    +2
    Well, as expected ..., now the EU and the Stripes will begin to put pressure on those who are friends with Russia. And the national Indian hut was not forgotten as it is called. AND???!
  14. Bassoon
    Bassoon 12 August 2014 07: 39
    0
    Share the cockroach got, and the mustache did not remain from him (s)
  15. Aydar
    Aydar 12 August 2014 07: 39
    +3
    arrogance knows no boundaries, how can you dissuade Chile, Brazil and other countries from doing business with the Russian Federation? Don't these countries have the right to decide with whom and how to trade?
    1. Rus86
      Rus86 12 August 2014 07: 43
      +1
      will find both causes and effects, even if "we do not know for sure, it should be clarified, but we think."
      that's interesting.
      will they be able to push in such a way as to FORCE. questions
  16. avant-garde
    avant-garde 12 August 2014 07: 39
    +11
    it seems like these idiots only through the anus! as soon as fried smells so immediately:
  17. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 August 2014 07: 40
    +3
    Ms. Psaki, please state that there is no threat to the United States. Soon the geyropa will pose a threat to you. Just as she still communicates with Russia. And after our embargo, it begins to understand that following your lead, it only has a minus in the balance.
  18. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 12 August 2014 07: 41
    +1
    “A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products can lead to a strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security, ”

    Pure Colorado logic.
  19. From Germany
    From Germany 12 August 2014 07: 41
    +14
    The full text, I don’t know, is it true or already about this some kind of pepper joke came up with a joke.

    Jen Psaki:
    - A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products may lead to the strengthening of the position of agricultural producers in Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security ...

    Further, a dialogue was entered into by Matthew Lee, a permanent opponent of Psaki, correspondent of the Associated Press agency:

    - But, in a broad sense, do you agree that ensuring food security through the efforts of your own producers is a free and inalienable right of any state ???

    - No, Matt, this is a matter of state policy exclusively. For example, US law since 2010 prohibits citizens from arbitrarily growing any agricultural produce, even for their own consumption.

    - But, as far as I know, in Russia there is no such law - and the people do not protest!

    - Matt, this is normal for a non-democratic country ...
    1. Shadow1
      Shadow1 12 August 2014 07: 56
      +5
      In general, the meaning of such a guzzle, US citizens, is what chemical concerns are producing for you and do not blather, and this is in the most "democratic country in the world"! Fuck you Mrs. Psaki from a private garden grown in the Tula region.
      1. From Germany
        From Germany 12 August 2014 08: 04
        +1
        Well, if this is true, then I do not care, gentlemen, comrades. This is no longer a free market, but a planned economy, and what they then blabbed for in the USSR, since our experience in the field of economics is being taken over. But what about the freedom of entrepreneurship, although it would be necessary to find out if they really have such an amendment since 2010.
        1. atalef
          atalef 12 August 2014 08: 10
          -1
          Quote: From Germany
          Well, if this is true, then I do not care, gentlemen, comrades

          Do not worry and not fig.
          article fake, there were no such statements. There are no links, continuous reposts. On the Associated Press and Matthew Lee website:
          there is no mention.
          http://www.aptn.com/
          check it out for yourself.
          Fake 100%
          1. From Germany
            From Germany 12 August 2014 08: 16
            +5
            So they also lie? http://www.portal-investor.ru/news/politic/8859?inv

            It will be necessary to search on English sites, by the way, if the assopress did not print this conversation, this does not mean that it was not.

            PS Do not poke me. We didn’t drink at the Brudershaft, or do you not observe the rules of elementary politeness in Israel?
            1. atalef
              atalef 12 August 2014 08: 21
              +1
              Quote: From Germany
              So they also lie? http://www.portal-investor.ru/news/politic/8859?inv

              Of course. Does not lie http://www.aptn.com/, and there is no mention of it. After all, it seems like their correspondent asked such uncomfortable questions.

              Quote: From Germany
              By the way, if the assopress did not print this conversation, this does not mean that it was not there.

              belay
              Somehow all the previous ones printed including all the uncomfortable questions of Matthew Lee, and then silence (by the way, and on his site the same)
              Quote: From Germany
              PS Do not poke me. We didn’t drink at the Brudershaft, or do you not observe the rules of elementary politeness in Israel?

              In Israel there is no appeal to you. (I didn’t want to offend you) - 20 years leaves some imprint.
              My appeal to you does not diminish in any way my respect for my opponent. hi
          2. vrach
            vrach 12 August 2014 08: 18
            +1
            Dear Atalef, the dialogue is thought up. But unfortunately, to be observant in the USA there are a lot of funny laws that can have very funny consequences. I am at work and I do not have time to look for all this for you. THE PROBLEM IN THAT THIS IS REALLY TRUE as it is in reality, and they are anecdotes from life.
            After the announcement that any humanitarian mission from Russia to Ukraine will be seen as an invasion, IT IS NOW ALSO TRUE. Well, let it be exclusively for you that Aesopian truth.
            1. atalef
              atalef 12 August 2014 08: 29
              +1
              Quote: vrach
              Dear Atalef, yes dialogue is thought up

              This is understandable, only nowhere in the article is there any mention of this. I am not a supporter of Psaki, but I can’t endure frank lies and divorce either
              Quote: vrach
              But unfortunately, to be observant in the USA there are a lot of funny laws that can have very funny consequences.

              Well ? What does this have to do with this article?
              Quote: vrach
              After the announcement that any humanitarian mission from Russia to Ukraine will be seen as an invasion, IT IS NOW ALSO TRUE

              This does not make the article true.
              By the way about the invasion - the same juggling
              In the original, it sounded like this
              Delivery of any goods without coordination with the Ukrainian authorities and due inspection at the border crossing points --- will be considered as a violation of the territorial integrity of Ukraine
              - Agree, there is a difference
              Quote: vrach
              Well, let it be exclusively for you that Aesopian truth.

              I understand . that the truth is generally a relative thing.
              But you should not give out for truth that. which was not at all.
            2. Shoma-1970
              Shoma-1970 14 August 2014 21: 20
              0
              The doctor, I agree with you, really after Pelen's statement "any humanitarian mission from Russia to Ukraine will be considered as an invasion" the Yankees can do everything, they themselves are not ashamed of their lies, and this will destroy them for a long, long time.
          3. Mwg
            Mwg 14 August 2014 18: 12
            0
            God grant that it be so. If otherwise, then there will be little left before direct force actions against the Russian Federation. After all, such a speech is an explanation of their actions for the future.
        2. Demon0n
          Demon0n 12 August 2014 08: 15
          +1
          Quote: From Germany
          Well, if this is true, then I do not care, gentlemen, comrades. This is no longer a free market, but a planned economy, and what they then blabbed for in the USSR, since our experience in the field of economics is being taken over. But what about the freedom of entrepreneurship, although it would be necessary to find out if they really have such an amendment since 2010.


          The USSR was an absolute competitor. At the expense of "vyakany" - there is nothing more than a screen to cover up the truth.
          True or not, it doesn't really matter. Anyway ... the essence is a screen. The truth is different.
        3. persei
          persei 14 August 2014 21: 44
          0
          Quote: From Germany
          and planned economy
          and not only the United States ... but also the EU, Japan ...
      2. ZSP
        ZSP 14 August 2014 15: 14
        0
        It will do without horseradish, we’ll eat it ourselves ... and let her clarify what it is laughing
    2. vrach
      vrach 12 August 2014 08: 01
      +1
      Thanks for the additional information. It turns out insanity can reach unprecedented depths.
      - No, Matt, this is a matter of state policy exclusively. For example, US law since 2010 prohibits citizens from arbitrarily growing any agricultural produce, even for their own consumption.


      Joke? Fair? I can’t even believe it. Could there be differences in state law? But there is evidence from other sources, it seems recently in Texas the police smashed a dairy shop, just for that. That is, in every joke there is a fraction of a joke. Yes, the dialogue was invented, but in fact it EXISTS. Damn, but this is an obvious violation of human rights and freedoms. It seems that the Americans should be saved from themselves, a monstrous substitution of basic semantic concepts is underway. But by the way ...

      this is normal for a non-democratic country ...
      1. zzz
        zzz 12 August 2014 08: 39
        0
        Quote: vrach
        Thanks for the additional information. It turns out insanity can reach unprecedented depths.
        - No, Matt, this is a matter of state policy exclusively. For example, US law since 2010 prohibits citizens from arbitrarily growing any agricultural produce, even for their own consumption.


        It’s true, but I don’t know exactly in which states it is possible and in which not. Only the lawn. And yet, I don’t remember where I read it. So, I can’t give links.
  20. BMVIK
    BMVIK 12 August 2014 07: 41
    +2
    It is interesting that this Madame will give out about a humanitarian convoy that went southeast. By the way, this morning I went to work and listened to Vesti FM. So, in all the news, the presenters call the DPR and LPR no other than Donetsk and Lugansk regions, and even Yevgeny Poddubny, who never called the republics in this way, but only as the proclaimed republics himself, spoke specifically about the region - it was unpleasant to listen to this. Did the team act just like that? And what does this mean - all this is not casual.
    1. Wheel
      Wheel 12 August 2014 07: 51
      +1
      Quote: BMVIK
      And what does this mean - all this is not casual.

      What is hard to guess?
  21. korablik
    korablik 12 August 2014 07: 43
    +1
    Psaku does not recognize. For the first time, reasonable words. This is when they stepped on the tail with a boot and are not going to clean. A year later, the old suppliers to Russia may not break through. Especially America. The question arises - whose sanctions are steeper? It’s like when the boys began to measure theirs and it turned out that someone put the last one at all.
  22. axel320
    axel320 12 August 2014 07: 44
    +1
    Lord, what a moronic face she has ...
  23. papont64
    papont64 12 August 2014 07: 44
    +6
    And also to ban mattress cigarettes and viskar and let them strangle themselves !!!)))
    1. K-50
      K-50 12 August 2014 12: 15
      +2
      Quote: papont64
      And also to ban mattress cigarettes and viskar and let them strangle themselves !!!)))

      So don't buy it yourself. Nobody forces. Each person with his wallet can "vote" what is best for him and what is not desirable.
    2. Mwg
      Mwg 14 August 2014 18: 04
      0
      No, viskar is not necessary))
  24. Pro100Igor
    Pro100Igor 12 August 2014 07: 44
    +19
    Psaki in his repertoire! lol
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 12 August 2014 07: 58
      0
      Wow, damn it! She can already cancel the seasons! laughing
      1. gray
        gray 14 August 2014 18: 05
        0
        There may even be application experience on August 6 and 9, 1945. That's just to charge enough for the whole winter.
  25. mig31
    mig31 12 August 2014 07: 45
    0
    If we ate and act in the lower hemispheres of the brain, then what happens is called idiocy. In order to establish peaceful trade relations, they decided to bite the bear, but the bear does not sleep ...
    1. Demon0n
      Demon0n 12 August 2014 08: 27
      0
      Quote: mig31
      If we ate and act in the lower hemispheres of the brain, then what happens is called idiocy. In order to establish peaceful trade relations, they decided to bite the bear, but the bear does not sleep ...


      Actually, there are objective premises for such a struggle. For global dominance, there are objective premises based on negative subjective experience / knowledge. Humanity has not learned how to coexist rationally and the likelihood that it will learn in the foreseeable future is close to zero. Hence conflicts. On the other hand, the tendency of progress in the means of attack and the nature of progress (here, the lack of counter-methods and their progress). Therefore, only one can survive (i.e. the rest should not be on the same technological level of development with the dominant). Extremely cold and cynical calculation, no more.
  26. Moore
    Moore 12 August 2014 07: 45
    +6
    “A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products can lead to a strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security, ”

    Either the State Department’s fool is so stupid (that on the mind, then in the language), or so arrogant that he does not consider it shameful to publicly wrangle about the need for internal control of the markets of other countries.
    She, adherents of the "invisible hand of the market", Gaidar sectarians, eggheads from the Higher School of Economics, - listen to the mouthpiece of the Light of Democracy and tell us, quilted jackets, about the "free market" further.
  27. B.T.V.
    B.T.V. 12 August 2014 07: 45
    +3
    If we translate the pearl of the girl Jen into simple language, it turns out: "all countries that provide themselves in abundance with their agricultural products are not democratic, and pose a threat to" the most democratic democracy in the world. " Eck all of them were seething, so they got to the right point. good
  28. AlNikolaich
    AlNikolaich 12 August 2014 07: 46
    +2
    Pancake! What a concern for US national security!
    They themselves imposed market laws on us! Imposed ...
    They themselves violated the laws of the market by introducing sanctions! Violated ...
    We got a decent answer! And now what are weeping?
    Free market, sorry! Whom we want, we will buy from him!
    Don’t breed hysteria, according to relics and fir trees!
    We didn’t start it ...
  29. Million
    Million 12 August 2014 07: 48
    +1
    Zadornov was right, really stupid!
  30. Zomanus
    Zomanus 12 August 2014 07: 48
    +2
    Would this Psaka not go? It hinders to control our agriculture, you know ... In general, they are insolent, it’s open to say. The fact that they will put pressure on South America is already understandable. Now bargaining for influence will begin.
  31. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 August 2014 07: 49
    +1
    Psaki began to tell the truth! Something in the forest has died. Argentina quickly organized a default, as an example to the rest of the Latinos - they say how the friendship with Russia ends. I hope not everyone is scared. Gringo in Latin America is hated by everyone. Uncle Sam’s grip weakens.
    1. atalef
      atalef 12 August 2014 07: 56
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Argentina quickly organized a default

      How can you quickly organize a default? If the economy is strong, and the price is just 1.3 billion dollars?

      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      here they say how friendship with Russia ends.

      Did Russia volunteer to help Argentina? Again, I remind you the price of the issue 1.3 billion --- not even money
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Gringo in latin America everyone hates

      Gringo is not Hispanic (or non-Portuguese).
      Russians are the same gringo laughing
      Gringo (born gringo from Spanish griego - Greek [1] [2] [3]) - in Latin America, the contemptuous name of a non-Hispanic (or non-Portuguese) foreigner, especially an American.

      Some authors note that the word "gringo" is not a curse word. This is slang, and it becomes derogatory only when used in an appropriate context. [4]
      1. andj61
        andj61 12 August 2014 08: 44
        0
        Quote: atalef
        How can you quickly organize a default? If the economy is strong, and the price is just 1.3 billion dollars?


        How? Yes, very easy! This is when an American court prohibits sending money already sent to the payment account for the purpose! That is, Argentina pays money, but money does not reach debtors - the payment system is American, well, or under the control of the United States.
        And here it is absolutely not important whether the country has money or not. If only with gold - physically - Argentina will be able to pay.
        1. atalef
          atalef 13 August 2014 07: 04
          0
          Quote: andj61
          Quote: atalef
          How can you quickly organize a default? If the economy is strong, and the price is just 1.3 billion dollars?


          How? Yes, very easy! This is when an American court prohibits sending money already sent to the payment account for the purpose! That is, Argentina pays money, but money does not reach debtors - the payment system is American, well, or under the control of the United States.
          And here it is absolutely not important whether the country has money or not. If only with gold - physically - Argentina will be able to pay.

          Andrey, everything was completely different
          Argentina wanted to restructure debt those
          The system is this. Argentina issued debt with maturity in June (and I don’t know what percentage per annum, but it doesn’t play the piano)
          Bonds were placed on the New York Stock Exchange, ordinary investors - tens of thousands of people bought them.
          The payment deadline has come, there is nothing to pay, Argentina has proposed restructuring the debt, namely - as a rule, this is done in two ways
          1. New securities are issued (usually at a higher percentage) and depositors are invited to exchange old ones for new ones
          2. It’s just that securities are declared garbage, they are not offered to be exchanged for new ones, part of the debt is written off, interest is not paid at all - technical default on securities.
          Oyua of these options (depending on which one will be accepted) must be approved by the meeting of investors
          Argentina wanted to rewrite debt for a longer period and exchange old for new debt
          The depositors council didn’t accept this - the deposit losses were very large and the state of the Argentinean economy and its prospects today are such that the depositors didn’t believe it and insisted on getting at least something to stay in the near future at all
          Since these bonds were issued on the New York Stock Exchange, a ban on their restructuring was issued by a US court at the request of depositors - that’s all, people just want their money back
          Argentina did not pay for these obligations. and can’t pay, and agree on the conditions acceptable to investors
  32. Grigorievich
    Grigorievich 12 August 2014 07: 54
    0
    As always, Psaki is burning, Soon after .. you are, there will be a threat to national security. Morons. wassat
  33. Shurale
    Shurale 12 August 2014 07: 55
    +1
    “We will talk with countries that could potentially replace our exports, to indicate to them that we expect them not to profit from the current situation,” the EU representative said during a briefing on Ukraine.

    Interestingly, they mean Mona to profit from different situations, and the Latinos can not, finally fucked up there ...
  34. KIRON
    KIRON 12 August 2014 07: 56
    0
    Wow! Here are the bastards! Let the geyropa send them their fruit and vegetables. Who cares where to rot! Jane has her role.
  35. reference
    reference 12 August 2014 07: 56
    0
    Psaki in his repertoire
  36. BMVIK
    BMVIK 12 August 2014 07: 56
    0
    Quote: Wheel

    What is hard to guess?

    It’s not difficult to guess, I just don’t want to believe in it, that it’s all in vain, and the death of the militias and the suffering of the civilian population.
  37. parusnik
    parusnik 12 August 2014 07: 57
    0
    According to him, some companies may conclude new contracts with Russia, however, it will be difficult to “find an excuse” for countries chasing diplomatic initiatives to take the place of the EU, Australia, USA and Norway.
    Why? Che fed up in Russia? ... And D. Psaki-biorobot, after failures in the program, the contacts were cleared .. she spoke differently ..
  38. GABALIS
    GABALIS 12 August 2014 07: 58
    +9
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/845/osie266.jpg
    1. PPL
      PPL 12 August 2014 08: 18
      +1
      It’s time already and Psaka to appropriate the title of world boxing champion, and in all categories at once. Brains are completely broken off ... lol
  39. asar
    asar 12 August 2014 08: 02
    0
    “We will talk with countries that could potentially replace our exports, to indicate to them that we expect them not to profit from the current situation,” the EU representative said during a briefing on Ukraine.


    Those. - will you do what we say wrong, mattress ?! So, everything is changing, "good gentlemen"! And the solid Russian market, in exchange for "your" goods, is ready to be gladly occupied by those with whom you "are going to talk" (and the "talker" will not "crack", Yankes ?!)!
  40. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 12 August 2014 08: 02
    0
    Stop pouring crocodile tears gg. lovers of European food. At your service are Tambov hams, salami and boiled pork with horseradish, Kostroma cheeses, and Smolensk cheeses. And who does not tolerate Russian food, u..yah, at least to Ukraine. Wonderful barter: we give them rubbish, Ukraine to us Donbass workers.
  41. Dejavu
    Dejavu 12 August 2014 08: 03
    +1
    Geyropeyskoe and Pendosovskoe whining- MUSIC for my ears !!! The year was a success, friends! drinks
  42. Fantazer911
    Fantazer911 12 August 2014 08: 04
    +1
    As Psaki doesn’t understand, we don’t need their GMOs, pesticides, chemicals, and other nonsense capable of killing a person, we ourselves can somehow grow potatoes, cabbage, etc. And do you want to taste Polish apples containing any poison yourself? and indeed it’s time to restore collective farms, state farms, villages, villages, agro-towns, in the USSR there was everything and no one depended on anyone, their livestock, poultry, cows, goats, sheep, pigs, and somehow they lived with everything including gardens were not small, but now ??? the country was ruined, everything was destroyed, and you want to plant us on the needle of food !? there isn’t enough, it’s time to restore everything that has been done so hard. And gentlemen, I personally do not want to see a composition of ten fingers, out of ten, and I was not mistaken.
  43. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 12 August 2014 08: 07
    +2
    Of course, if Russia has refused to import agricultural products, and even if seriously, it will really take up the restoration of its destroyed agriculture, which, incidentally, has been destroyed by the West, then we spat from the high belfry on your various sanctions and threats, shove them yourself in the ass (your favorite place).
  44. avia12005
    avia12005 12 August 2014 08: 08
    0
    And the very existence of the United States is a threat to the security of the whole world. am
  45. pvv113
    pvv113 12 August 2014 08: 10
    +5
    “A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products may lead to the strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security. ”

    Clever girl! She said aloud what all American politicians were silent about: a strong Russia poses a "threat to the US national security." Therefore, they will do everything to prevent Russia from strengthening its position. And they will use all means to weaken Russia, even the dirtiest
  46. vvsz031249
    vvsz031249 12 August 2014 08: 10
    +1
    “A sharp decline in imports of Western agricultural products can lead to a strengthening of the position of agricultural producers within Russia. Therefore, the loss of control over a significant segment of the agricultural products market in Russia may constitute a potential threat to US national security, ”
    These are our sworn friends ... The fact that Russia will eat its products is a threat to the United States. Truly, no matter what RUSSIA does, everything threatens their safety. Everywhere you need to stick your nose, dictate your will to everyone and everything ... Since strengthening our food security is so scary for the states, then we are doing everything right ... Keep it up!
  47. Serg7281
    Serg7281 12 August 2014 08: 14
    0
    This is European - democratic. How sanctions against Russia are "right", but how to get a return is immediately "wrong" and politically motivated. Moreover, there are threats to all other countries that want to take their places. With such shitty values, a gamerope will go far, just paired with her mattress boss and roommate. Where Russia sent it on August 6, although in principle they should have been there a long time ago.
  48. frcdkfl047
    frcdkfl047 12 August 2014 08: 16
    +1
    Over the past time, since the crisis in Ukraine, we have seen completely deranged Western "partners", so wouldn't it be better not to pay attention to them at all, but to methodically and systematically raise our economy, to do whatever we consider necessary without paying attention to all this western barking and whining !?
  49. k1995
    k1995 12 August 2014 08: 18
    +1
    Damn, with each of her speeches, because of democratic smiles, the skull and bones peer out more and more, Hitler nervously kills the bull in the side next to the Nobel laureates.
  50. Viktor64
    Viktor64 12 August 2014 08: 22
    +2
    Americans, when they don’t think, are telling the truth: US national security is threatened by the fact that Russia can provide itself with the main thing - food. The USA is a plug in all barrels. I would like to look at the head of a Latin American state that will announce an embargo on the supply of products to Russia, how long this head will live and what, not so rich citizens, who were just so happy that they can earn, will do it to him.