Iraqi military entered Baghdad

14
Iraqi military, security forces and Tanks to contain possible unrest due to the political crisis, reports INTERFAX.RU with reference to the TV channel CNN.

Iraqi military entered Baghdad


Tanks appeared in several central areas of the Iraqi capital. Officials say that significant forces arrived in the Green Zone of Baghdad, where there are many government buildings, the headquarters of the military and the US embassy.

The aggravation of the political crisis in the country began after the accusations of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki against the newly elected President Fuad Masum of violation of the constitution: the extension of the term for nomination of the candidate for the post of prime minister for parliamentary coalitions.

A CNN expert noted that the exact reason for the introduction of troops into Baghdad is unknown, but it seems that al-Maliki wants to retain power, so he began to force himself into the city.

On Sunday, al-Maliki stated that he would file a complaint against Masuma for violation of the constitution.

Kurdish politician Fuad Masouma, who has been a deputy since 2005, was elected to the presidency in July. After that, the parliamentarians had to choose a new prime minister. Critics of al-Maliki urged him to abandon this post, but he refused.

Political shifts in Iraq were initiated by the United States, which advocated the inclusion of representatives of all social and ethnic groups in the country. This is one of the conditions for the provision of military support in the confrontation with the militants of the "Islamic State", who seized a large part of Iraqi territory.
  • http://www.interfax.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    11 August 2014 06: 56
    Where the Americans have been, there will be no peace. Wherever they come, everywhere they bring only evil and misfortune.
    1. +3
      11 August 2014 07: 13
      I am outraged to the core that the USA has managed to evade responsibility for its crimes. This is a car to kill innocent people, children and women. Sometimes the hypocrisy of this state simply rolls over.
      1. -5
        11 August 2014 07: 17
        Quote: ya.seliwerstov2013
        This is a car to kill innocent people, children and women. Sometimes the hypocrisy of this state simply rolls over.

        Do you really think that if it were not for the United States, then the Arabs would not have killed each other on a confessional basis?
        1. +2
          11 August 2014 07: 32
          Do you think that the United States, out of humane motives, is engaged in regime change?
        2. 0
          11 August 2014 08: 28
          Well, something like that under Saddam, no matter how dictator he was, as a dictator, in his country it was quieter and safer at times than now!
        3. 0
          11 August 2014 09: 08
          Quote: Nayhas
          Do you really think that if it were not for the United States, then the Arabs would not have killed each other on a confessional basis?
          At the moment, I think not ... Since it was already under Saddam ... The US aggression threw Iraq 60 years off in its development and they must go through it again ... and it is not yet known who will take it.
        4. 0
          11 August 2014 09: 32
          The essence of calm in the Arba countries is simple - it’s tough to keep everyone, and whoever buzzes, the top to the wall at an early stage, still a level of deep kitchen discussion. For this, by the way, Kadafku and Sadamku. Here are the fruits of democracy:

          Yesterday ISIS shot around the Kurds 500, which five days ago was taken prisoner and the Kurdish representatives tried to pull out the loot and stuff.

          Benghazi under the Islamists (light version of ISIS), General Haftar retreats through the desert. And in Tripoli, power is divided between parliament, government, the president and Haftar. And the fact that half the country has come unstuck is not up to them.
    2. 0
      11 August 2014 07: 19
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Where the Americans have been, there will be no peace. Wherever they come, everywhere they bring only evil and misfortune.

      And therefore, the United States should send its troops to Iraq and stay there until a single state is restored, in which the interests of all national minorities, all confessions are respected. And if it is real, then they should be able to rake it up, which they themselves have piled on! As well as other "peacekeepers" from NATO countries.
    3. +1
      11 August 2014 08: 16
      Indeed, our Americans were not allowed to invade Cuba, and although it is poor, it has been living quietly for 50 years.
      But let's try to analyze the situation, the Americans are slowly starting to get involved in the 3-th Iraq war. What made them start the bombing near Erbil? The fact that no one stood up for Kurdistan - neither Iran, nor Russia, nor the Turks, nor Baghdad itself, apparently because of the American oil rigs there. The Americans did not strive much for the Shiite sector of Iraq, in the Sunni ISIS now. Politics. It is beneficial for Iran, Russia, and Turkey and Baghdad so that the Americans get stuck in Iraq again and they gradually push them to this. But at least an immediate supply of Su 25 for Iraqi Shiites (Al-Maliki government), the conclusion of oil deals with Iran. Silent glanders canalize the onset of ISIS in Kurdistan

      The Americans made al-Maliki’s resignation one of the conditions of their military assistance, this did not happen, so the separation of allies by interests took place. Iran and Moscow will be protected by Baghdad, the Americans are Erbil.

      Well, inst, fuck - Clinton began to criticize Obama's Iraqi policy, which she also oversaw, which is not surprising, but old McCain annealed, he demanded to bomb (if you read carefully) ISIS units not only in Iraq but also in Syria (! !!), what does it mean to help Assad ?! This is an indicator of a complete failure ... and a possible risk of losing everything that was achieved by the intervention in Iraq. And they also offended Erdogan.

      What then to say? Probably - glory to Putin ... In the end, it’s not the same idiots to sing hosanna.
      1. Turik
        0
        11 August 2014 08: 18
        Sorry for my French.

        "La Finita Comedy" or "Ali Baba and 400 thousand Mujahideen".
  2. +5
    11 August 2014 06: 58
    Not everything is calm in Baghdad ... "Thank you" USA.
    1. +3
      11 August 2014 07: 06
      Quote: svp67
      Baghdate

      Moderate or something moderator laughing
      1. +3
        11 August 2014 07: 17
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: svp67
        Baghdate

        Moderate or something moderator laughing

        lol
        1. 0
          11 August 2014 08: 00
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Moderate or something moderator

          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: svp67
          Baghdate

          Moderate or something moderator laughing

          lol

          Well what can I say .... feel . Probably better than Vasily Ivanovich and will not work ...
    2. 0
      11 August 2014 07: 25
      American "democratic forces" bombed Iraq and continue to make "peaceful democracy". That word is fucked up-democracy.
      1. 0
        11 August 2014 08: 32
        "democracy" to be more precise.
  3. +1
    11 August 2014 06: 58
    Their house is on fire, and they started a family squabble.
    1. Hawk2014
      0
      11 August 2014 08: 42
      Quote: Mountain Shooter

      Their house is on fire, and they started a family squabble.

      Well, there are houses that really want to burn! If hated relatives live under the roof of this house.
  4. +2
    11 August 2014 07: 00
    It smelled of fried, and it's all democracy from the states ...
    1. +3
      11 August 2014 07: 04
      our planet is smoldering, smoldering ... and from blue, one day it will turn into red ...
  5. 0
    11 August 2014 07: 16
    Where there is a smell of oil and gas, there will always seem to be blood pouring. The struggle for resources and dominance among mattresses is already in the genes, until they are satisfied with the new Pearl Harbor.
  6. VICTOR-61
    0
    11 August 2014 07: 21
    Americans all got with their war who needs such a democracy?
    1. 0
      11 August 2014 07: 34
      Quote: VICTOR-61
      Americans all got with their war who needs such a democracy?
      If the planet is "lit", then someone needs it ... negative
  7. 0
    11 August 2014 08: 32
    ...........................
  8. +1
    11 August 2014 08: 48
    Kurdish politician Fuad Masum, who has been a deputy since 2005, was elected president
    Fine! The President of Iraq MADE (and how else could they not have chosen) the representative of the Kurdish people, who are not the largest in this country. It’s all the same that they would push a Chechen field commander into the presidency of the Russian Federation. And then the Americans are still surprised, why aren't the Iraqis calm down there?
  9. Hawk2014
    -1
    11 August 2014 09: 04
    Quote: Nayhas
    Do you really think that if it were not for the United States, then the Arabs would not have killed each other on a confessional basis?

    Good question, but to whom is it addressed? It must be understood that the Russian inhabitants do not care about the problems of other regions, especially as complex as the Middle East. They need to satisfy their inferiority complexes. Therefore, they rephrase the constantly famous phrase of Cato the Elder with tenacity worthy of a better application. Although they themselves are far from Catons.
  10. Hawk2014
    0
    11 August 2014 09: 07
    Quote: Nayhas
    Do you really think that if it were not for the United States, then the Arabs would not have killed each other on a confessional basis?

    And not only confessional, but also tribal, too.
  11. Hawk2014
    0
    11 August 2014 09: 31
    Iraq is an artificial political entity. The British and French, as the winners of the First World War, were torn away from the Ottoman Empire without thinking about their future. In Syria, it turned out to be easier - the population there is more homogeneous. And in Iraq there are Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds. And they have been at enmity for more than a thousand years. The enemy who lives on the other side of the river (or even on the next street in general) is not an enemy that is located across the ocean. You won't be able to forget about him. Because meeting with him is "by many orders of magnitude" more probable (chiai - you must meet).
    1. +1
      11 August 2014 10: 19
      There is actually a Kurdish minority (which suddenly elected the president of the country).
      The Shiite majority, but it is inert and hatskrayniki.
      The Sunni minority, but they are active, almost immediately rebellion.

      Under Saddamka, the Sunnis were the ruling nation and therefore were silent, and all troublemakers, even at the stage of kitchen thoughts were taken for interrogation, and themselves.

      And now, the Sunni communities are raising uprisings, in the same Diyala, the IAI (Islamic Army of Iraq) is fighting - which is pretty bad about ISIS. In Anbar there are tribes and groups that are also not very good with ISIS, but support the uprising and are fighting with government troops. Shiites against this background, as they say, throw their uniforms and weapons and run. Hence the whole crisis. Only now, government units began to form ideological units and Shiite police. They are more or less resistant.

      Against this background, at night, the Americans took the embassy in Baghdad to Basra.

      Meanwhile, new orders are already in Iraq.
  12. kelevra
    0
    11 August 2014 14: 02
    Only the Americans flew into the sky, immediately became bolder! We must defend our homeland ourselves!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"