Samantha Power against Russian humanitarian interventionists
Samantha Power warned yesterday: any attempt by Russia to deliver humanitarian aid to the east of Ukraine is devoid of logic, and therefore will be considered an invasion. In her opinion, the provision of humanitarian aid is actually a “one-sided intervention” on Ukrainian territory. From this statement, by the way, it becomes clear that only “multilateral intervention” is permitted on Ukrainian territory - the US and the EU. Russia there is no entry.
The statement by the US permanent representative to the UN, Samantha Power, made at the Security Council meeting RIA News".
According to Samantha Power, Russia should not deliver humanitarian aid to Ukrainian territory:
According to Power, assistance should be provided by international organizations, not Russia:
RIA "News“To this adds that Russia had previously proposed in the Security Council to send to the east of Ukraine an international mission with Russian humanitarian aid accompanied by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Kiev responded by saying that it would cope on its own and that there was no humanitarian crisis in Ukraine.
Well, of course, what a humanitarian crisis there is: soon all Ukrainians from the southeast, shot by Poroshenko’s soldier, will become refugees. Nobody needs any help on that “territory”: after all, everyone will run away. Hence the iron logic of the American lady from the Security Council, which uses the terrible term "invasion". Apparently, Samantha Power believes that the Russian army, headed by Putin, will come to the east precisely when all peaceful citizens will leave.
Bravo, Samantha! You made a fat hint of Poroshenko that he, unlike Putin, does not consider peaceful citizens.
However, American politicians have too poor imagination to spin such a plot of spiral.
By the way here answer The Foreign Ministry of Ukraine, given to Russia 5 August on the proposal for humanitarian aid under the auspices of the Red Cross: “The proposal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation regarding the so-called international humanitarian mission in Donbass is cynical if only because Russia continues to destabilize the situation in eastern Ukraine, fully supports criminal acts of terrorists and is fully responsible for humanitarian problems in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions. In addition to the deliberate destruction of the vital infrastructure of the region, houses, water supply and electricity systems, the terrorists so-called. “DPR” and “LPR”, among which there is a significant number of citizens of the Russian Federation, attack medical institutions and their personnel, bombard hospitals, impede the treatment of patients, and steal ambulances.
Good portrait, do not say anything.
It turns out that Russia has become the number one terrorist on the planet. Not surprisingly, many Western “analysts” have renewed their predictions that after Ukraine, Comrade Putin will take up Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Finland and further on the historical list. Plus, here, apparently, the list of countries-sanctionsionok - so that the "invasion" the other day will have to wait for Canada and Australia. And comrade Putin will end his glorious campaign with a victory in Washington.
We return to the Russian "invasion".
NATO is also waiting for him.
On August 6, the press secretary of the North Atlantic Alliance, Oana Lungesku, appeared in the media. “We will not guess what Russia has in mind, but we can see what Russia is doing, and this is of great concern. Russia gathered about 20 thousands of combat-ready military on the eastern border with Ukraine ", - noted the she is.
“The last military strengthening of the Russians further aggravates the situation and undermines efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis. This is a dangerous situation, ”the spokeswoman added.
The NATO bloc believes that Russia, under the pretext of a “humanitarian or peacekeeping mission,” can send an army to the east of Ukraine.
As for the Russian threat, some statements were made in Britain, the first ally of the United States.
Britain urged Russia to refrain from "humanitarian intervention" in Ukraine, said Foreign Minister Philip Hammond.
“I am deeply concerned about reports of increased heavy weapon flows from Russia and reports about training the Russian army for“ humanitarian intervention ”in a third country. The conditions for such intervention in eastern Ukraine clearly do not exist. In these circumstances, such intervention will be unreasonable and illegal. I urge Russia to avoid any provocative actions that will cause increased instability in the region and lead to further devastating consequences for Russia’s relations with Europe, ”Hammond said. 112.ua.
Now back to Samantha.
It explainedhow Russian soldiers can invade eastern Ukraine and what they will do there:
That is, the adjective “Russian” cannot be attached to the noun “peacemakers”. Samantha discovers a contradiction here. Apparently, the "Russian" can only be "occupiers." This is not an oxymoron.
Of course, Samantha, in her rank, is supposed to understand the difference between peacekeepers and peacekeepers in quotes. The real, not oxymoron, peacemakers are the brave Americans who sow democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq. In the latter, democracy has not only recently emerged, but also flourished in a lush Islamist color.
The real peacekeepers are the NATO members who have bombed Yugoslavia and Libya. Everything is fine there too, as we know from the news.
The Russians only do that to help the militants and engage in annexations and occupations, now dreaming of creating a Soviet Ukraine and extending its borders to the North Pole, now intending to join Australia to the Jewish Autonomous Region. “Russia declares that it seeks peace, but continues to support the separatists. We see how the world was brought to the Crimea after the occupation and annexation: freedom of speech is suppressed, minorities are persecuted, ”the US representative quotes newsru.ua.
Washington is particularly "shocked" by the fact that Russia "doubled its support for the militants after the crash with the Malaysian plane." On this occasion, Power said: “We condemn it. This is another insult to the memory of the dead and their families. ”
That's it.
And after all this — from Power’s statements and psaki’s comments at briefings to the appointment of Tefft’s Orangeman to the post of US Ambassador to Russia — can anyone doubt that the cold war is going on? Barack Obama assures us that Ukraine is only an episode, but there is no cold war. Apparently, she really isn’t, but the White House and NATO Headquarters are planning a hot ...
The statement by the US permanent representative to the UN, Samantha Power, made at the Security Council meeting RIA News".
According to Samantha Power, Russia should not deliver humanitarian aid to Ukrainian territory:
“... any unilateral Russian intervention on Ukrainian territory, including under the guise of providing humanitarian aid, will be absolutely unacceptable and extremely troubling. And it will be considered an invasion of Ukraine. ”
According to Power, assistance should be provided by international organizations, not Russia:
“Given that Ukraine has allowed international humanitarian organizations to deliver aid on its territory, there is no logic as to why Russia should deliver it.”
RIA "News“To this adds that Russia had previously proposed in the Security Council to send to the east of Ukraine an international mission with Russian humanitarian aid accompanied by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Kiev responded by saying that it would cope on its own and that there was no humanitarian crisis in Ukraine.
Well, of course, what a humanitarian crisis there is: soon all Ukrainians from the southeast, shot by Poroshenko’s soldier, will become refugees. Nobody needs any help on that “territory”: after all, everyone will run away. Hence the iron logic of the American lady from the Security Council, which uses the terrible term "invasion". Apparently, Samantha Power believes that the Russian army, headed by Putin, will come to the east precisely when all peaceful citizens will leave.
Bravo, Samantha! You made a fat hint of Poroshenko that he, unlike Putin, does not consider peaceful citizens.
However, American politicians have too poor imagination to spin such a plot of spiral.
By the way here answer The Foreign Ministry of Ukraine, given to Russia 5 August on the proposal for humanitarian aid under the auspices of the Red Cross: “The proposal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation regarding the so-called international humanitarian mission in Donbass is cynical if only because Russia continues to destabilize the situation in eastern Ukraine, fully supports criminal acts of terrorists and is fully responsible for humanitarian problems in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions. In addition to the deliberate destruction of the vital infrastructure of the region, houses, water supply and electricity systems, the terrorists so-called. “DPR” and “LPR”, among which there is a significant number of citizens of the Russian Federation, attack medical institutions and their personnel, bombard hospitals, impede the treatment of patients, and steal ambulances.
Good portrait, do not say anything.
It turns out that Russia has become the number one terrorist on the planet. Not surprisingly, many Western “analysts” have renewed their predictions that after Ukraine, Comrade Putin will take up Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Finland and further on the historical list. Plus, here, apparently, the list of countries-sanctionsionok - so that the "invasion" the other day will have to wait for Canada and Australia. And comrade Putin will end his glorious campaign with a victory in Washington.
We return to the Russian "invasion".
NATO is also waiting for him.
On August 6, the press secretary of the North Atlantic Alliance, Oana Lungesku, appeared in the media. “We will not guess what Russia has in mind, but we can see what Russia is doing, and this is of great concern. Russia gathered about 20 thousands of combat-ready military on the eastern border with Ukraine ", - noted the she is.
“The last military strengthening of the Russians further aggravates the situation and undermines efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis. This is a dangerous situation, ”the spokeswoman added.
The NATO bloc believes that Russia, under the pretext of a “humanitarian or peacekeeping mission,” can send an army to the east of Ukraine.
As for the Russian threat, some statements were made in Britain, the first ally of the United States.
Britain urged Russia to refrain from "humanitarian intervention" in Ukraine, said Foreign Minister Philip Hammond.
“I am deeply concerned about reports of increased heavy weapon flows from Russia and reports about training the Russian army for“ humanitarian intervention ”in a third country. The conditions for such intervention in eastern Ukraine clearly do not exist. In these circumstances, such intervention will be unreasonable and illegal. I urge Russia to avoid any provocative actions that will cause increased instability in the region and lead to further devastating consequences for Russia’s relations with Europe, ”Hammond said. 112.ua.
Now back to Samantha.
It explainedhow Russian soldiers can invade eastern Ukraine and what they will do there:
“We should not allow forces that would in fact forcibly seize the territory to penetrate under the cover of humanitarian aid. Recently, Russian "peacekeepers" were sent there. This is an oxymoron. ”
That is, the adjective “Russian” cannot be attached to the noun “peacemakers”. Samantha discovers a contradiction here. Apparently, the "Russian" can only be "occupiers." This is not an oxymoron.
Of course, Samantha, in her rank, is supposed to understand the difference between peacekeepers and peacekeepers in quotes. The real, not oxymoron, peacemakers are the brave Americans who sow democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq. In the latter, democracy has not only recently emerged, but also flourished in a lush Islamist color.
The real peacekeepers are the NATO members who have bombed Yugoslavia and Libya. Everything is fine there too, as we know from the news.
The Russians only do that to help the militants and engage in annexations and occupations, now dreaming of creating a Soviet Ukraine and extending its borders to the North Pole, now intending to join Australia to the Jewish Autonomous Region. “Russia declares that it seeks peace, but continues to support the separatists. We see how the world was brought to the Crimea after the occupation and annexation: freedom of speech is suppressed, minorities are persecuted, ”the US representative quotes newsru.ua.
Photo: Yuri Kochetkov / Reuters
Washington is particularly "shocked" by the fact that Russia "doubled its support for the militants after the crash with the Malaysian plane." On this occasion, Power said: “We condemn it. This is another insult to the memory of the dead and their families. ”
That's it.
And after all this — from Power’s statements and psaki’s comments at briefings to the appointment of Tefft’s Orangeman to the post of US Ambassador to Russia — can anyone doubt that the cold war is going on? Barack Obama assures us that Ukraine is only an episode, but there is no cold war. Apparently, she really isn’t, but the White House and NATO Headquarters are planning a hot ...
Information