Kiev and Washington will "photoshop" the red stars on the wings of the Su-25, shot down "Boeing"?
7 August Australia announced the day of mourning for the victims of the disaster "Boeing-777" in Ukraine. Flags on all government offices and buildings of Australian diplomatic missions abroad are lowered.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott сказал: “We mourn all the 298 innocent victims, but most of all we mourn the 38 men, women and children for whom Australia was home. We deeply condole with the families of the victims and give them support in the coming difficult times. ”
ITAR-TASS reports that Russia has transmitted to the UN and the OSCE monitoring data on the area of the crash of the aircraft. This was stated by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vitaly Churkin, speaking at a meeting of the UN Security Council. Comrade Churkin stressed that Russia "provides all possible assistance to the investigation" of the plane crash.
Meanwhile, one of the preliminary reports of international experts, published by the Malaysian edition "New Straits Times", once again gave reason to catch the Ukrainian military in a lie. An expert group investigating the causes of the crash of Boeing-777 of Malaysia Airlines, after examining a series of shots from the crash site, concluded that the passenger airliner was most likely shot down by a military plane. The possible brand of the aircraft is also called Su-25.
Referring to the representatives of the expert group, the publication of the New Straits Times writes that the initial strike on the Malaysian Boeing was caused by an air-to-air missile, and then the military aircraft attacking the airliner fired a series of shots from an 30-mm cannon.
From the New Straits Times:
Experts note that the re-attack of a passenger plane from aviation the pilot needed the guns in order to “finish off” the airliner. At the same time, the expert group does not say anything yet about which side the military attack aircraft could have attacked, which attacked a passenger plane, on board of which there were 298 people.
In principle, already now there is little point in expecting the conclusions of the same expert group about the Su-25 attack aircraft belonging, as information about its belonging several days after the tragedy was spread by the Russian Defense Ministry with the provision of evidence obtained through tracking systems. According to this information, it was the Ukrainian Air Force that received an order to take an attack aircraft into the air, which for some time was moving from the MH-17 at a distance of 5 km, moving closer to 3 km with episodes. Even taking into account the fact that the Su-25 attack ground's practical ceiling is about 7500 m, and the Malaysian liner was moving at an altitude of about 10 thousand meters, this difference in altitude is not a big problem for an attack aircraft to deliver an accurate strike. At the same time, the data provided by the Russian Ministry of Defense suggests that the Ukrainian Air Force’s Su-25 began to move away from the Boeing-777 precisely after it began to lose altitude. To some it may seem like a coincidence? Not yet in this world psaki, in the end ...
The statements of experts submitted by the Malaysian edition, publishing materials in English, in fact, reject the version that the airliner was shot down with the help of the Buk air defense system. The nature of the damage after a missile fired from this complex got into the plane would, to put it mildly, be somewhat different, as noted by the representatives of the foreign expert group. By and large, for people who have an idea of how aviation weapons and anti-aircraft missiles operate, this was understandable after receiving the first shots from the scene of the tragedy. But in our case (as it happened lately), one has to pay attention to the nonsense of Kiev and their distribution through psaki channels. And in this regard, the flimsy stool, which they were trying to base, finally knocks out from Kiev nonsense. If foreign experts admitted that the plane was shot down not by “Buk”, but by Su-25, then present-day Kiev has only two options for further actions: either through Psaki to declare that they are not experts, but charlatans, or to give “evidence” of that Su-25 was not Ukrainian, but in any way “separatist”, “Russian”, “Martian”.
True, in this case, Kiev will have to not just. The fact is that the head of the intelligence department of the US defense department, Michael Flynn, in an interview "The Wall Street Journal" made a sensational confession. According to him, the first thing that guided the Pentagon after the tragedy with "Boeing 777" in the Donbas in terms of voicing the reasons, were published in social networks.
Michael Flynn:
According to Flynn, the US Department of Defense reacted to the message on the social network "VKontakte", where the militia allegedly stated that "they shot down a transport aircraft."
Amazing But Lieutenant General Flynn quite calmly admits that American intelligence seriously turned to the use of social networks as the primary sources of information for their work. Why satellites, why radar, if there is a "VKontakte" and "Facebook"? ..
What to say about Psaki, Harf, Ernest and all the other "talking heads" of Washington! ..
It turns out that for the "trolling" of the intelligence department of the US Department of Defense, you can now do any nastiness and, most importantly, immediately publish information about it from any name on the social network. And you can not do, and just publish ...
An example of a social network entry for the start of the urgent work of American intelligence and psaki comments: “51 a year ago. Kennedy. It was us. Kohl, Gogh, Boria (abbreviated - KGB). Please do not copy the message. It's top secret! ”
In general, we expect a reaction to the conclusions of the expert group on the causes of the tragedy with Boeing from Kiev and Washington. From which "instagrams" will they draw their excuses for their crime now? ..
Prime Minister Tony Abbott сказал: “We mourn all the 298 innocent victims, but most of all we mourn the 38 men, women and children for whom Australia was home. We deeply condole with the families of the victims and give them support in the coming difficult times. ”
ITAR-TASS reports that Russia has transmitted to the UN and the OSCE monitoring data on the area of the crash of the aircraft. This was stated by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vitaly Churkin, speaking at a meeting of the UN Security Council. Comrade Churkin stressed that Russia "provides all possible assistance to the investigation" of the plane crash.
Meanwhile, one of the preliminary reports of international experts, published by the Malaysian edition "New Straits Times", once again gave reason to catch the Ukrainian military in a lie. An expert group investigating the causes of the crash of Boeing-777 of Malaysia Airlines, after examining a series of shots from the crash site, concluded that the passenger airliner was most likely shot down by a military plane. The possible brand of the aircraft is also called Su-25.
Referring to the representatives of the expert group, the publication of the New Straits Times writes that the initial strike on the Malaysian Boeing was caused by an air-to-air missile, and then the military aircraft attacking the airliner fired a series of shots from an 30-mm cannon.
From the New Straits Times:
In some pictures from the crash site, the fragments from the explosion coincide with those that are left weapon with a remote fuse, while others can see more accurate and heap holes from gun fire. We are engaged in the analysis of the collected information.
Experts note that the re-attack of a passenger plane from aviation the pilot needed the guns in order to “finish off” the airliner. At the same time, the expert group does not say anything yet about which side the military attack aircraft could have attacked, which attacked a passenger plane, on board of which there were 298 people.
In principle, already now there is little point in expecting the conclusions of the same expert group about the Su-25 attack aircraft belonging, as information about its belonging several days after the tragedy was spread by the Russian Defense Ministry with the provision of evidence obtained through tracking systems. According to this information, it was the Ukrainian Air Force that received an order to take an attack aircraft into the air, which for some time was moving from the MH-17 at a distance of 5 km, moving closer to 3 km with episodes. Even taking into account the fact that the Su-25 attack ground's practical ceiling is about 7500 m, and the Malaysian liner was moving at an altitude of about 10 thousand meters, this difference in altitude is not a big problem for an attack aircraft to deliver an accurate strike. At the same time, the data provided by the Russian Ministry of Defense suggests that the Ukrainian Air Force’s Su-25 began to move away from the Boeing-777 precisely after it began to lose altitude. To some it may seem like a coincidence? Not yet in this world psaki, in the end ...
The statements of experts submitted by the Malaysian edition, publishing materials in English, in fact, reject the version that the airliner was shot down with the help of the Buk air defense system. The nature of the damage after a missile fired from this complex got into the plane would, to put it mildly, be somewhat different, as noted by the representatives of the foreign expert group. By and large, for people who have an idea of how aviation weapons and anti-aircraft missiles operate, this was understandable after receiving the first shots from the scene of the tragedy. But in our case (as it happened lately), one has to pay attention to the nonsense of Kiev and their distribution through psaki channels. And in this regard, the flimsy stool, which they were trying to base, finally knocks out from Kiev nonsense. If foreign experts admitted that the plane was shot down not by “Buk”, but by Su-25, then present-day Kiev has only two options for further actions: either through Psaki to declare that they are not experts, but charlatans, or to give “evidence” of that Su-25 was not Ukrainian, but in any way “separatist”, “Russian”, “Martian”.
True, in this case, Kiev will have to not just. The fact is that the head of the intelligence department of the US defense department, Michael Flynn, in an interview "The Wall Street Journal" made a sensational confession. According to him, the first thing that guided the Pentagon after the tragedy with "Boeing 777" in the Donbas in terms of voicing the reasons, were published in social networks.
Michael Flynn:
The first data about who shot him down, what shot him down, when and where he was shot down - all this was obtained from social networks.
And this was done literally within a few minutes of what happened.
According to Flynn, the US Department of Defense reacted to the message on the social network "VKontakte", where the militia allegedly stated that "they shot down a transport aircraft."
Amazing But Lieutenant General Flynn quite calmly admits that American intelligence seriously turned to the use of social networks as the primary sources of information for their work. Why satellites, why radar, if there is a "VKontakte" and "Facebook"? ..
What to say about Psaki, Harf, Ernest and all the other "talking heads" of Washington! ..
It turns out that for the "trolling" of the intelligence department of the US Department of Defense, you can now do any nastiness and, most importantly, immediately publish information about it from any name on the social network. And you can not do, and just publish ...
An example of a social network entry for the start of the urgent work of American intelligence and psaki comments: “51 a year ago. Kennedy. It was us. Kohl, Gogh, Boria (abbreviated - KGB). Please do not copy the message. It's top secret! ”
In general, we expect a reaction to the conclusions of the expert group on the causes of the tragedy with Boeing from Kiev and Washington. From which "instagrams" will they draw their excuses for their crime now? ..
Information