Military confrontation is growing

The forecast, which was published on its pages by the popular science weekly New Scientist, looks extremely daunting. The publication informs that global warming, which today is observed on the planet, leads to the displacement of its axis. As a result, there is a danger that our native Earth will de facto be pulled off its hinges.

The researchers found that the rise in the average daily temperature on the planet causes heating of the ocean’s waters, and warm water significantly increases the inclination of the Earth’s axis of rotation. At the moment, the bias process is not so significant: about 1,5 centimeters per year. But no one can predict what society is waiting for in the coming years. Moreover, on the nose "damned" Maya 2012 year.

At the moment, it is known that the displacement of the axis of rotation of the planet occurred repeatedly. This is confirmed by numerous historical sources, as well as the works of Herodotus and Plutarch that have reached us. “Four times during this time, the Luminary rose against its habit,” Herodotus told the Egyptian priests, “twice it rose where it now sits, and twice it sat where it now rises.”

In astronomical tables that have come down to us from the Middle Ages, it is indicated that Babylon was located much further to the north than the place where the ruins of this city are located today. It turns out that before the last displacement of the axis, the North Pole was located in the region of 600 of the north latitude, which is at the 300 south of the presently located pole. It is assumed that the earth's axis descended from its normal place during the Flood.

What could be the scenarios of the results of a natural disaster? According to geophysicists, it is permissible that the number of earthquakes and tsunamis in the Pacific and Indian oceans, volcanic eruptions will increase. As a result of the activity of volcanoes, emissions of their gases and ash may well lead to the onset of a “nuclear winter”: it will become dark and cold. The earth's surface will begin to fall and rise - walk in waves. The ocean will overflow and all that will be on its way will flood.

However, it is worth recalling that due to an earthquake within Southeast Asia in 2004, the axis of the planet, according to the results of measurements by geophysicists, shifted to 3 centimeters. As a result, the speed of the daily turnover of the Earth increased, and the day itself decreased by 3 microseconds. And the apocalypse did not happen. Maybe the current breakdown in the natural mechanism of the Earth will not lead to anything serious?

New threat - secret geophysical weapon HAARP?

As you know, in 1997, on the Alaska Peninsula, the United States commissioned a secret radio electronic system with the most powerful radiating system, the HAARP installation. According to the Pentagon, officially, this is a research station. However, civilian scientists on its territory are not allowed, and there is irrefutable evidence that the Americans were able to create the first geophysical weapons with a capacity of more than 3,5 million watts. 180 antennas, which are aimed at zenith in a field with a total area of ​​13 ha, provide the possibility of heating the ionosphere before the formation of a high-temperature plasma.

The creator of the system, Bernard Estlund, confirms that with the support of HAARP it is quite possible to change the wind rose and influence the weather. Military experts back in the late 90's. last century, warned that as a result of the use of HAARP, unforeseen reactions of the Earth’s magnetic field, up to a change in the existing magnetic poles, are permissible. Perhaps due to the latest alarming messages, HAARP has already begun to influence the axis?

Now there are three such objects in the world. One, above-mentioned, in Alaska, 2 in Norway, in Tromso, and 3 in Sura, is in Russia. The Sura complex is comparable in power to the overseas NAARR and is located in the central zone of Russia 150 km from Nizhny Novgorod, it is on the balance of the Research Radio Physics University. However, today financing of “Sura” is much more modest compared to the American program.

At this time, the United States is commissioning the 3, especially a strong emitter in Greenland, which will make it possible to influence the entire territory from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

Scientists from around the world point out that there is a certain argument that it is unthinkable to control the weather, because it is formed by strong energy processes occurring in dense layers of the Earth’s atmosphere in the layer to an altitude of 10 kilometers, and the ionosphere is located at altitudes more than 100 kilometers. However, we note that basic science in its majority in the United States today is funded, as a rule, by the military, given that research in the foreseeable future will have for the defense not real, but real value. Accordingly, all the processes that are worked out on them, in the future, may be used for military purposes.

An interesting indirect fact of preparation for a future weather war is the actual working out of the plan to create special units in the United States Army for rapid deployment in the conditions of various natural disasters.

Based on this, there are unbiased reasons to believe that possible military conflicts of the 21st century will be accompanied not only by combat operations using weapons of mass destruction, missiles, tanks, high-precision weapons, aircraft, ships, etc., but also climatic weapons that can influence including on the microclimate on a global scale.

If we take into account such prospects, there appears a need to pay attention to the management in the system of military-political processes in the system of ideological values ​​by the powerful elite. 1-I and 2-I world wars were the result of not only the intensification of rivalry between the world imperialist states for sources of energy and the formation of power. A new consumer ideology, far from philosophy, arose, which was based, among other things, on the postulate that Nietzsche had once formulated that “the Almighty died” and, consequently, there are no true value goals in the modern world. The utilitarian results of a similar denial of the obvious religious-philosophical dimension of social processes, including in the sphere of military-political entities, are well known.

There is a fear, given the emergence of new military-political challenges, for the near future of Russia, the future of the world around and in general, life on the planet. Apparently, we need some new, diverse and unconventional steps, additional measures to ensure national security and, most importantly, international stability, from the experience of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century that showed the reality of the most devastating ways of resolving conflict situations and conducting hostilities. It is necessary to consider that it is precisely the militarily dominant United States that has the political and psychological practical experience of using nuclear weapons in the 20th century, and therefore can use the new inevitable forms and methods of warfare, when this, in their opinion, corresponds "Pragmatic" interests.

The appearance in the Black Sea of ​​the US Navy fighting cruiser Monterey, on board of which the Aegis anti-missile system was installed, in the framework of participation in the Ukrainian-NATO exercises, Sea Breeze-2011, actualized for neighboring Russia the question of how to ensure their own national security in the XXI century, including in the space of neighboring countries. A serious and frank challenge to security is today’s fundamental differences on the future architecture of a European missile defense system between NATO and Russia. According to Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, the meeting of the Russia-NATO Council, which was held on June 8 in Brussels, did not allow the parties to reach a unified decision on missile defense. Russia proposes making a joint system with NATO and the United States based on the regional thesis of the distribution of state responsibility in certain missile defense sectors, while the NATO leadership does not accept the Russian approach, justifying its position by saying that the military alliance is responsible for the safety and security of its members . NATO, for its part, is proposing Russia to build two independent and powerful missile defense systems and to establish strategic information exchange, which, according to the words of the Alliance Secretary General Anders Rasmussen, will make it possible to more effectively protect the territories of both Russia and NATO.

The cruiser "Monterey" was sent to the waters of European waters as part of the implementation of a phased preparatory approach by the US administration to the formation of the European segment of the overall missile defense system. The 1 stage of this program begins with the deployment in the Mediterranean, Adriatic and Aegean Seas of a group of overseas ships designed to protect southern European countries from hypothetical and unwarranted rocket threats. According to the official version of the US government, they can also be sent to the Black Sea in case of emergency, for example, if the situation in the region aggravates. Under these conditions, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in its comment from 12 of June of the current year raises justified questions: in the event that it is a question of an ordinary “visit” to this maritime region bordering Russia, then why was the warship chosen for it with such a weapon option? ? And what role was assigned to the Monterey antimissiles according to the scenario of the “Sea Breeze-2011” exercise, during which the “anti-piracy operation on the NATO system” was tested?
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in