What is New Russia and what it will be

92
Interview with writer German Sadulayev on the future of Novorossia, a state that has now been revived in south-eastern Ukraine and has loudly declared itself. According to Sadulayev, the uniqueness of the moment is that for the first time in modern times the Russians have come out for their statehood.

Let's turn to the very meaning behind the name of the new state - Novorossia, New Russia. This is a beautiful name, isn't it? What is your association?

- The name is beautiful. Appealed to the future by its very meaning. And, simultaneously, associated with history. Personally, I have the first association with the city of Novorossiysk, where my sister lives. But maybe the name is not the most important thing.

Historical territories of the Northern Black Sea region, which were part of the Russian Empire, were called Novorossia. Now they began to talk about the process of collecting land by Russia, with regard to the annexation of the Crimea, the term “restoration of historical justice” sounded. How relevant is the historical factor for today's Novorossia? Why was New Russia revived right now?

“Oh, the past is a dangerous thing.” It's like a powder keg. Of course, the Northern Pontic is Russia. New or something else there, but Russia. And the point is not only that this was once in history, but also that in 20 years after the collapse of the USSR this land did not become, did not want to become something else. All those who wanted - steel. It had plenty of time. But New Russia did not want to become non-Russia. This, I think, is the reason for everything.

Detractors say that Novorossia is a “virtual education” and do not want to believe in its existence. What arguments can you argue in favor of the reality of New Russia? whether it will receive formal international recognition? Or is Novorossia waiting for the fate of Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhazia? How do you think?

- Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia have a completely normal fate. We hope that the fate of Novorossia will be at least as good. There will always be detractors who will say something. It is necessary to build a de facto state. The practice of international law is such that de facto states sooner or later become de jure states.

What is the novelty of this state, in your opinion, how does the New Russia differ from other countries and state entities?

- The novelty, probably, is that for the first time in modern times it was the Russians who spoke out for their statehood. Usually Russians, remaining in the minority in other countries, more or less resign themselves to their role. But here the Russians and Ukrainians, oriented not toward the West, but towards independent historical being, became the subject of the historical process.

What territory do you see behind Novorossia in the end? If you go back to history again, Kharkiv, Nikolaev, Odessa, Kherson, Tiraspol and other areas previously entered Novorossia.

- I think it would be good so far to consolidate the de facto state in the territories of Donetsk and Lugansk regions. Do not get involved in build-up areas. This is not a matter of the amount of land, but as a state precedent.

What language (languages) and religion would you suggest for Novorossia as official, and why?

“Unfortunately, I don’t know local realities so well that I can advise something there.” But it is obvious that the language is Russian, the culture is Russian, Russian. And nowhere should religion be made official and state. Religion is an internal matter, a matter of the soul.

Which of today's heroes of Novorossia cause your sympathy, for whom you follow with interest, which of these people do you see as the main leader of Novorossiya? Which city has become the capital?

- Of course, Strelkov and Motorola are very bright personalities, warriors. Leader I would not allocate. The point is not the leader, but the mass of people who are able to defend their interests. All of them are cute to me. And let Slavyansk be the capital if you ask me. It has already become a legendary city.

What status is most acceptable for Novorossia — an independent entity, as part of the Customs and Eurasian Unions, or as part of Russia?

- To begin with, it would be quite nice if Novorossia remained within Ukraine as a subject of a federation or confederation. And then people would calmly decide how and with whom they should develop. The status of the subject of the Federation of Ukraine would protect the minimum rights of the population to their language, culture, and their economy. And I would not have to fight. After all, war is always bad. But the problem is that Kiev is categorically against federalization! So this is their choice, the choice of Kiev is that compromises have become impossible. Kiev started the war and pushed Novorossia to the secession. Now New Russia will be an independent state, better if one. It is not necessary to enter the Russian Federation. And of course, it is necessary to enter the Customs and Eurasian Unions.

Do you like the motto of Novorossia "Will and Labor"? What could you propose from your side as a slogan-motto of this state?

- I like the motto, it echoes Russian socialism, populism. I would like to advise that the builders of the new state pay more attention not only to the national side of ideology, but also to the social one. We need a strong left-wing idea, socialism. Russian socialism.

Have you been on the territory of New Russia?

- No, alas, I was not in New Russia. And I have never been to Ukraine. Somehow it happened that no. But I, probably, will go. I would even take part in state building. I don’t have any military specialty, I don’t know how to fight, and I don’t want to, I can’t - I need to have a different psychophysical status. And I am a vegetarian, I will not even cut a ram, let alone kill people. But I would work as a lawyer to build the legal system of Novorossia. Well, the smallest minor assistant.

The mission of the people of art, culture, literature is to be visionaries. Do you already have the image of New Russia in your work?

- I already wrote a little story, “Last Spring” is called. Our friend Sergey Shargunov traveled to Novorossia at the height of the fighting. Surely write something serious. And in general, it turned out that we live again in an epic time. Such people near us! Such events! So, the novels will be about this, real ones. And movies. Because the main thing that we lacked in art was real heroes, real events. Now they are.

What future of New Russia do you see when, as you think, peace will come on this earth?

- Probably, everything will not be quickly adjusted. But then everything will be fine. The main thing is that the hostilities should end soon and people should be given a quiet, peaceful life as they themselves want, as they chose for themselves in a referendum.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +41
    30 July 2014 14: 22
    Dear! Who can comment on what is written in the picture, is this true?


    If so, then international law is bursting at the seams. I believe that it is necessary to load the courts to the maximum with work, for all violated norms, for insults and false accusations of Russia. Yugoslavia with Iraq recall. It's time to collect stones.
    1. raccoon
      +2
      30 July 2014 14: 25
      NOT in the subject, yesterday I saw a video about the inspection of Donetsk bomb shelters, the question arose: What about the unfinished Donetsk metro !!! This is a huge anti-nuclear bunker, where you can hide the entire population of Donetsk !!! Does anyone have information ???
      1. DPZ
        +3
        30 July 2014 16: 59
        is there an unfinished metro in Donetsk? ohhh, we are twin cities! we have been building subways in Chelyabinsk for 20 years, or even more !!! lol
        1. randomizer
          0
          30 July 2014 20: 57
          They began to build it, but began to fall into houses under the ground and closed the project. For a long time, a coal was mined there, under the city there were a million and one piece of shtreks and all kinds of artificial voids. In Donetsk, in the middle of the city, skyscrapers and glamorous cafes, heaps stand)
        2. 0
          31 July 2014 06: 58
          We have the same crap in Omsk .., we heat the stoves with firewood, and let's go to the metro .., now it’s like a suitcase without a handle - and there’s nothing to finish building (stolen ..) and bury it! The former "owner" in the loons warms his belly, the new turnip is scratching ... R about me ... Well, in Novorossia smart men are at the helm .., hope, everything will be as it should.
    2. Schweinsteiger
      -18
      30 July 2014 14: 29
      Quote: Muadipus
      Who can comment on what is written in the picture, is this true?

      Why comment nonsense?
      1. Who
        +8
        30 July 2014 14: 35
        Are you a specialist in international law?
        1. +10
          30 July 2014 14: 39
          Quote: vem
          Are you a specialist in international law?

          Judging by the nickname, he is special in football.
          1. +5
            30 July 2014 16: 05
            Eh-he-he ........ There will be no Novorossiya now. A little later, in 5-6 years there will be Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, Kharkov, etc. area within the union state "Rus" or as it will be written in the Constitution "Russian Soviet Socialist Union" (RSSS). And they will dignify it abroad, namely dignify, and not pronounce Soviet Union (SU).
            1. blackberry
              +3
              30 July 2014 16: 17
              Quote: baltika-18
              Eh-he-he ........ There will be no Novorossiya now. A little later, in 5-6 years there will be Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, Kharkov, etc. area within the union state "Rus" or as it will be written in the Constitution "Russian Soviet Socialist Union" (RSSS). And they will dignify it abroad, namely dignify, and not pronounce Soviet Union (SU).

              And, for example, where will the Kharkiv Armenians go? It's me who clung to the word "Russian". I hint at the exceptional danger for the future state of restrictions imposed by the terms "Russian world", "Orthodox world", "Slavic world", etc. Think about it.

              By the way, "Soviet" is not very clear here either. And as "socialist" - how does the murky role of oligarchic surnames and in general the very economic structure of the states in which we all now live? Socialism was killed along with the Soviet Union. Revive the socialist Soviet system housekeeping management? I will support. Any specific suggestions?
              1. +5
                30 July 2014 17: 13
                Quote: blackberry
                And, for example, where will the Kharkov Armenians go?
                There are 1.5 million Armenians in Russia, and 111 Russians only in Russia, not counting Ukraine. Germany also has many Turks, but it is Germany.
                Quote: blackberry
                Revive the socialist Soviet management system? I will support. Any specific suggestions?
                Yes Fight and seek, find and not give up. Time will tell.
                1. blackberry
                  0
                  30 July 2014 21: 35
                  Quote: baltika-18
                  Quote: blackberry
                  And, for example, where will the Kharkov Armenians go?
                  There are 1.5 million Armenians in Russia, and 111 Russians only in Russia, not counting Ukraine. Germany also has many Turks, but it is Germany.

                  The example is so-so. Germany has always been called that, within any borders. The Russian states had different names, also within different borders. It is I who give you a fine excuse to abandon the term. I understand your idea, but I assure you, it is a losing one. Listen to the Kazakh Russian very attentively - no statistics, decrees, archeology with history, convictions with persuasion will force a modern person to recognize mono-ethnicity and exist in rights less than those of the title. Lesser rights always entail a reduction in obligations to such a proclaimed state. In my opinion, and according to the results of 23 years of such existence, I see how much harm it brings not only to the state, but to its titular population, even if they themselves hope for something else, and none of the non-titular ones is not going to dissuade them - they just live according to their own non-public an action plan that always has an alternate aerodrome clause. This policy is erroneous if we bear in mind the internal policy of the state. As for Russia, it needs allies along its borders, and this is also being implemented by a competent policy towards representatives of the respective nationalities. Do I need to expand this thought? Even the phrase "Russian Empire" in this sense is capable of making more moves on the chessboard. The problem is with the word "empire". In general, this is a separate topic, and the topic is difficult. In all senses.
                  Quote: baltika-18
                  Quote: blackberry
                  Revive the socialist Soviet management system? I will support. Any specific suggestions?
                  Yes Fight and seek, find and not give up. Time will tell.
                  This is demagoguery. Either there are proposals, or they are not. If there are no proposals, radical slogans are not needed. They harm even the most beautiful idea, make it frivolous, lightweight.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. 0
                    31 July 2014 01: 08
                    Quote: avia1991
                    Somewhere I missed something ..
                    In the Russian Federation, 150 million people. More than 40 million Tatars alone. If there are 111 Russians, then where are all the other nations? ..


                    Tatars are not as many as they seem laughing

                    Nationality Number
                    (people)
                    % of the total
                    Russians 115 889 107 ...79,83%
                    Tatars 5 ...554%
                    Ukrainians 2 ...942%
                    Bashkirs 1 ...673%
                    Chuvash 1 ...637%
                    Persons who did not indicate nationality 1 ...460%
                    Chechens 1 ...360%
                    Armenians 1 ...130%
                    Mordva 843 350 ...0,58%
                    Avars 814 473 ...0,56%
                    Belarusians 807 970 ...0,56%
                    Kazakhs 653 ...962%
                    Udmurts 636 ...906%
                    Azerbaijanis 621 840 ...0,43%
                    Mari 604 298 ...0,42%
                    Germans 597 212 ...0,41%
                    Kabardians 519 ...958%
                    Ossetians 514 875 ...0,35%
                    Dargins 510 156 ...0,35%
                    Buryats 445 175 ...0,31%
                    Yakuts 443 ...852%
                    Kumyks 422 409 ...0,29%
                    Ingush 413 ...016%
                    Lezgins 411 535 ...0,28%
                    Komi 293 406 ...0,20%


                    worldgeo.ru/russia/lists/?id=33
              2. +1
                31 July 2014 07: 06
                Yes, you do not strain so harmful. In Armenia, ALL Armenians .., in Tatarstan ALL Tatars .., well, in Russia ALL Russians .., bulds?
          2. Cadet787
            +1
            30 July 2014 17: 46
            Hi Sasha.
            As modern lawyers and political scientists have admitted, today there is not any international law and never was, when there is a strong right. If we claim to be the Great Power, then this must be put at the forefront of our policy.
            1. 0
              31 July 2014 01: 08
              Quote: Cadet787
              there is not any international law and never was, there is a strong law.

              I totally agree. And with all his love for "playing chess", our President should not allow opponents to humiliate and insult the country, which he has the HONOR of leading, with impunity.
        2. Schweinsteiger
          -5
          30 July 2014 15: 28
          Quote: vem
          Are you a specialist in international law?

          I have some knowledge and responsibly declare that what is written in the picture is nonsense.
          1. 0
            30 July 2014 16: 37
            Quote: Schweinsteiger
            I have some knowledge and responsibly declare that what is written in the picture is nonsense.


            What nonsense ??? Because you did not like ?! laughing
      2. +4
        30 July 2014 14: 45
        Quote: Schweinsteiger
        Why comment nonsense?

        but I don’t know the delirium or not. And I would like to read a knowledgeable person in international law.
        1. +1
          30 July 2014 15: 50
          International law today is a fiction.
          1. +1
            30 July 2014 16: 57
            Quote: Gorinich
            International law today is a fiction.

            That's it! And the content requires a new edition, and the enforcement is a mockery of the implementation of the law in general. As far as Novorossiya is concerned, destructive problems begin with unnecessary "politeness". What is the "composition of Ukraine" (confederation, federation ...) if Soviet Ukraine itself is a completely artificial, unnatural formation for this purpose and created to once burst and sprinkle everyone to death ?! Any borders within the state are the greatest temptation for its enemies along these borders and destroy and, at least - because of "these borders" sow discord. Russia was united, and it should be like that! GOD will give and will be.
            1. blackberry
              0
              30 July 2014 21: 16
              Quote: 1812 1945
              Quote: Gorinich
              International law today is a fiction.

              That's it! And the content requires a new edition, and the enforcement is a mockery of the implementation of the law in general. As far as Novorossiya is concerned, destructive problems begin with unnecessary "politeness". What is the "composition of Ukraine" (confederation, federation ...) if Soviet Ukraine itself is a completely artificial, unnatural formation for this purpose and created to once burst and sprinkle everyone to death ?! Any borders within the state are the greatest temptation for its enemies along these borders and destroy and, at least - because of "these borders" sow discord. Russia was united, and it should be like that! GOD will give and will be.

              It seems that you generally live on another planet. Even though I agree with the thesis about the missed opportunity to federalize Ukraine, the Russian Федерация - existing state. These are the realities. And what about the politeness? And when discussing the artificiality of any state formation as a result of the signing of the Bialowieza Agreement, you are very at risk of recognizing the future of New Russia, no matter where it takes place. I try to speak very carefully and at the same time as clearly as possible in the current situation. Hope it worked out.
      3. +1
        30 July 2014 16: 31
        Quote: Schweinsteiger
        Why comment nonsense?


        The delirium is full of resources. You’ll go there as you plunge into the trash.
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 16: 41
          Quote: mamont5
          The delirium is full of resources. You’ll go there as you plunge into the trash.


          In June, I visited one Ukrainian forum, so all the visitors there are clearly out of fantastic reality))) One of the visitors suggested that the United States is supplying weapons ... fellow PUPILS DNI and LC for the fight against the Ukrainian army.
    3. +4
      30 July 2014 14: 35
      Quote: Muadipus
      Dear! Who can comment on what is written in the picture, is this true?

      Not strong in international law. It sounds beautiful, but naive, so I doubt the legal validity of this wording, but it's a pity ...
      German Umaralievich +++
    4. +1
      30 July 2014 14: 39
      Quote: Muadipus
      If so, then international law is bursting at the seams.

      Countries did not recognize the referendum, including Russia.
    5. +6
      30 July 2014 14: 51
      Not in the subject, but ...... wassat
      Bloggers and social media users cannot understand why US Department of State spokesman Jen Psaki appeared at the latest press briefing in one boot. The video, which is posted on the website of the State Department, shows that on her left leg is a black boot, and the right one is barefoot.http://russian.rt.com/article/43132#ixzz38whLmtfQ
      1. +3
        30 July 2014 14: 55
        There is still video laughing
        1. +1
          30 July 2014 17: 55
          Psaki our almost national treasure! I suggest to cherish and cherish! Otherwise, they can replace it. Maybe they’ll put a smart one. And I like the conclusions of Psssaki!
        2. +1
          30 July 2014 19: 33
          A kind of allegory - confirmation of her image - sleeping in one shoe. Only in the American version - he walks in one boot. I just saw this video on the news. I remember the movie "Gentlemen of Fortune", the moment when gentlemen walk down the street in ladies' clothes and high-heeled shoes:
          - Girl, and girl, what is your name?
          - Lena.
          - And me Fedya.
          - Well, a fool.
          Well, this fool is Psaki. Ural dumplings have a rest.
          1. bpyotr
            0
            30 July 2014 21: 43
            Quote: Svetlana
            A kind of allegory - confirmation of her image - sleeping in one shoe. Only in the American version - he walks in one boot. I just saw this video on the news. I remember the movie "Gentlemen of Fortune", the moment when gentlemen walk down the street in ladies' clothes and high-heeled shoes:
            - Girl, and girl, what is your name?
            - Lena.
            - And me Fedya.
            - Well, a fool.
            Well, this fool is Psaki. Ural dumplings have a rest.
            It seems that the psaki for this was invented to breed Russian suckers: while we make fun of her, it does not matter that someone does not make fun of us. I don’t think that the Americans are complete idiots (and even more so their puppeteers) to expose by means of psaki an entire country suffering from an inferiority complex, in the form of complete idiots. I don’t think ...
            1. bpyotr
              0
              30 July 2014 21: 49
              Shershite not a woman, but after her!
      2. APS
        +4
        30 July 2014 15: 01
        Laughing out loud. Followed the link I read comments.
      3. +3
        30 July 2014 15: 12
        You better have twisted your neck! Looks like the problems of the world Psaku "DISTURBED" and on alpine skiing! "Turned up", in short! laughing And with the head it became very tight, you see, "kissed" tightly! wassat laughing
        1. +4
          30 July 2014 15: 54
          Quote: asar
          It would be better if you fool turned your neck!

          Come on! This is such a trick .... "psychological", to divert attention from moronic facial expressions and stupid speeches - "look at my legs." "EVERYONE will look at their feet, and they will ignore the fact that I will lie this time."
      4. raccoon
        0
        30 July 2014 15: 22
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Bloggers and social media users cannot understand why US State Department spokesman Jen Psaki appeared at the latest press briefing in one boot. The video, which is posted on the website of the State Department, shows that on her left leg is a black boot, and the right one

        Here is such a city scattered from the street Pooling.
      5. 0
        30 July 2014 15: 26
        For a thick boot. it's more like boots
      6. +7
        30 July 2014 15: 29
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        why US State Department spokesman Jen Psaki appeared at the latest press briefing in one boot.

        The second is John Kerry.
      7. 0
        30 July 2014 16: 18
        probably she was torn off in the corridor by Obama first, then Poroshenko, so intense that she had enough strength to pull on one boot ...
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 17: 06
          this is how much you need to drink to "swing" at the dog! laughing laughing
      8. Crimea-nyash
        +1
        30 July 2014 16: 29
        probably only enough time to pull a coward and a skirt.
    6. +7
      30 July 2014 15: 13
      Quote: Muadipus
      Dear! Who can comment on what is written in the picture, is this true?


      If so, then international law is bursting at the seams. I believe that it is necessary to load the courts to the maximum with work, for all violated norms, for insults and false accusations of Russia. Yugoslavia with Iraq recall. It's time to collect stones.

      Who invented this? What is the UN international law ?! Where in the MP will you find the message "SUPPRESS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE" ?! There is the right to self-determination and a referendum, but there is no right to the obligation of recognition, there is only the precedent of the MP. In general, do not flatter yourself .Recognize independence when he is strong or there is another force behind you.
      1. blackberry
        0
        30 July 2014 15: 44
        Quote: Predator
        Quote: Muadipus
        Dear! Who can comment on what is written in the picture ...
        If so, then international law is bursting at the seams. I believe that it is necessary to load the courts to the maximum with work, for all violated norms, for insults and false accusations of Russia. Yugoslavia with Iraq recall. It's time to collect stones.

        Who invented this ?! What is such an international UN law ?! Where in the MP will you find the message "SUPPRESS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE" ?! There is a right to self-determination and a referendum, but there is no right to the obligation of recognition, there is only precedent MP. In general, do not flatter yourself. Recognize independence when you are strong or another force is behind you.

        actually, judging by how you write the word precedentYou are not particularly familiar with jurisprudence. Therefore, the proposal not to flatter yourself would hold you back.
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 16: 32
          in general, judging by how you write the word precedent, you are not particularly familiar with jurisprudence. Therefore, the proposal not to flatter yourself would hold you back.
          I admit a mistake, but the rest is not. Yes, and time does not allow sometimes to look at the spelling and spelling. Work, however. But from your side in general on this no gu-gu! As an example, you do not have the same shine "in general" is written like this , not like you! Regards.
          1. blackberry
            0
            30 July 2014 16: 50
            Quote: Predator
            in fact, judging by how you write the word precedent, you are not particularly familiar with jurisprudence. Therefore, the proposal not to flatter yourself would hold you back.
            I admit a mistake, but the rest is not. Yes, and time does not allow sometimes to look at the spelling and spelling. Work, however. But from your side in general on this no gu-gu! As an example, you do not have the same shine "in general" is written like this , not like you! Regards.

            Precious, you commented on the commentator’s judgment, exposing your supposedly more professional opinion. Since I made a mistake in the basic legal term, I doubted your competence, and, therefore, the right to break it off so sharply. But I make a comment on general literacy - why on earth? I do not like illiterate comments, but I try to just pass by those if their meaning did not interest me. Parenting has not been canceled. Recommend.

            As for your attempt to correct me, please first check the textbook. Here is a quote from the Great Dictionary:
            in general - Use. when highlighting or contrasting; though, meanwhile. Many argue with him, and in. he is right. V. He is an eccentric, but interesting with him. III. In char. introduction next
            (= generally speaking). Generally. I. in zn. introduction next

            http://www.gramota.ru/slovari/dic/?word=%E2%EE%EE%E1%F9%E5&all=x
      2. +1
        30 July 2014 20: 16
        There is not even such a concept as "UN international law"!
        There are two competing rules of international law:
        1. The right of nations to self-determination.
        2. The territorial integrity of the UN member states.
        In the 50s and 60s, the first norm prevailed in the international arena, somewhat later the second, but no one canceled the first.
    7. +5
      30 July 2014 15: 18
      This would be ideal; but probably in the near future it is not real, unfortunately.
      1. +2
        30 July 2014 20: 19
        And if you "spit" 200 years ago ...
    8. ..Dmitry..
      +1
      30 July 2014 15: 28
      maybe the answer is here
      http://vse-uchebniki.com/mejdunarodnoe-pravo-besplatno/mejdunarodno-pravovaya-ha
      rakteristika-30921.html
      1. 0
        30 July 2014 17: 09
        thanks for the reference
    9. +2
      30 July 2014 16: 20
      At the moment, Novorossia needs air recognition by Russia as air. Then after that, everything will be wrapped in a different vein.
    10. 0
      30 July 2014 16: 30
      Quote: Muadipus
      If so, then international law is bursting at the seams.


      It cracked and fell apart long ago. The states themselves actually introduced the right of the strong.
      1. +1
        30 July 2014 18: 01
        The power law ALWAYS existed!
    11. +1
      30 July 2014 17: 20
      Eh, I hurried to put you a plus, but really, where does this text come from? Why provoke? First announce where the text comes from!
    12. bpyotr
      -1
      30 July 2014 20: 36
      Quote: Muadipus
      Dear! Who can comment on what is written in the picture, is this true?


      If so, then international law is bursting at the seams. I believe that it is necessary to load the courts to the maximum with work, for all violated norms, for insults and false accusations of Russia. Yugoslavia with Iraq recall. It's time to collect stones.
      What problems!? Let's collect them for those who scattered them!
  2. +1
    30 July 2014 14: 25
    There was a time to scatter stones, it was time to collect ...
  3. +5
    30 July 2014 14: 28
    Private opinion. I would like to recognize New Russia as a subject of international law! Russia would recognize! Yes, and many may ask to participate, otherwise we write off debts to everyone in a row without demanding anything in return!
    1. torajiro
      -10
      30 July 2014 14: 54
      And this is Putin's policy. He will not recognize Novorossiya. She is afraid of offending the "Ukrainian partners" who are killing our relatives in Donbass.
    2. +3
      30 July 2014 14: 59
      Quote: nomad74
      Private opinion. I would like to recognize New Russia as a subject of international law! Russia would recognize! Yes, and many may ask to participate, otherwise we write off debts to everyone in a row without demanding anything in return!

      It's time to recognize the independence of New Russia and provide assistance. Gringos pull the fascist junta by the ears, supply everything we need and crush us with sanctions.
  4. +2
    30 July 2014 14: 29
    The main thing is that the hostilities should end soon and give people peace, peace


    As long as the United States exists with its globalism .... not a single country will live peacefully ..... the USA will unleash wars all the time to establish its dominance over the world ... NEW RUSSIA is no exception and it will go a long and difficult path of its formation, of course with the support of RUSSIA.
    1. +1
      30 July 2014 17: 34
      Guys! Remember to add at the end of each comment: "Besides, I think the US should be destroyed"!
    2. 0
      31 July 2014 01: 18
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      it will go the hard and long way of its formation, of course, with the support of RUSSIA.

      AMEN!..
      We would only have to wait for this support from Russia. And then the words are the same, plus the distraction of attention to their problems: “Oh, in Moscow it smelled of smoke!” .. Drive to the Kolyma - there is a flood!
  5. +3
    30 July 2014 14: 29
    International law has cracked and ordered to live long. It's time for new formations.
    1. +2
      30 July 2014 14: 36
      Quote: Wend
      International law has cracked and ordered to live long. It's time for new formations.

      US policy in recent years has buried international law. Only the interests of the superpowers remain.
      If the United States suddenly decides to attack us, it will not look back at international law or will interpret it in its favor.
      Well, New Russia-to be. Its people have proved their viability in the unequal struggle for independence. I would like that there would be New Russia with its center in Kiev, with the Kharkov, Zaporizhzhya and Odessa regions, and Ukraine was limited to Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk ..
      1. 0
        30 July 2014 14: 57
        This is the most fair and correct, otherwise Ukraine will not allow life to live in Novorossia. It is necessary to expel all evil spirits in the western part. New Russia, this is a new state and the agreement with the EU in this territory will lose its force and will be valid only in the territory of the remaining Ukraine. Accordingly, no restitution and the possibility of entering the customs union.
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 15: 30
          Thinking right ... For example, an LLP participant tries to stand out, takes his share in proportion to the contribution, and also takes on the debt in proportion to the contribution ... why can not Novorossia do the same ?!
      2. Commissar
        0
        30 July 2014 23: 26
        You are not alone! So many people think.
    2. blackberry
      0
      30 July 2014 16: 00
      Quote: Wend
      International law has cracked and ordered to live long. It's time for new formations.

      If you mean that the time has come to revise the entire system and documents of international law, then yes, I support it. At the moment, it is, firstly, powerless against states that violate the rights of its citizens, secondly, it supports the right of the state, not human rights, recognizes peoples on a territorial basis, ignoring all the others, and, as we have seen, this is erroneous ( well, at least a limited) judgment.
  6. +2
    30 July 2014 14: 30
    Quote: Muadipus
    Dear! Who can comment on what is written in the picture, is this true?


    If so, then international law is bursting at the seams. I believe that it is necessary to load the courts to the maximum with work, for all violated norms, for insults and false accusations of Russia. Yugoslavia with Iraq recall. It's time to collect stones.



    What kind of picture is it and at the same time angry and personally impressing me very much, really, does anyone have information on this ???? hi
    1. +1
      30 July 2014 14: 49
      hi
      BUT! Logically, if such a legal act really existed, then in the world there would be no priori unrecognized republics. or at least not recognized by the UN.
      1. assa79
        0
        30 July 2014 14: 59
        one might think that they are doing everything according to the laws ... they only say that only our laws are not enforced, but in fact, in Russia, it seems, there are fewer laws than anywhere else that are ignored by everyone, including those who hold power
  7. +3
    30 July 2014 14: 32
    To the question of when peace will come in New Russia, I think the answer is the same - the junta will fight until the last Ukrainian, so the world will come when she herself is overthrown to hell. And I think this will happen soon, because politics without economics is nothing ..
  8. 0
    30 July 2014 14: 33
    everything is far from clear hi
  9. +5
    30 July 2014 14: 34
    I’m a writer myself - I write comments and SMS, every day - I’ve scribbled more than one novel!
    New Russia will have a future only in one case - if Russia recognizes it! And for Russia to recognize New Russia, it needs to prove its viability and perspective as a state entity! In the meantime, you can see the heroism of the militias, the indulgence of local politicians, the drunkenness and nagging of refugees in Russia and no unity!
  10. DMB-88
    +1
    30 July 2014 14: 34
    I would like Novorossia to become the flagship in the unification of Russian lands in the struggle for independence and democracy!
    and most importantly, to end the war, sincerely sorry for the civilian population suffering at the hands of the Kiev oligarch-Jew-Masonic sect!
    1. bpyotr
      0
      30 July 2014 20: 56
      Quote: DMB-88
      I would like Novorossia to become the flagship in the unification of Russian lands in the struggle for independence and democracy!
      and most importantly, to end the war, sincerely sorry for the civilian population suffering at the hands of the Kiev oligarch-Jew-Masonic sect!

      I would like this. What are YOU saying, but the world has not been waiting for us for about 1200 years, and each time, as if reaching the world, we lose it. Look for the reason, and the world will come later, not earlier.
  11. +4
    30 July 2014 14: 35
    Russian socialism - and it sounds beautiful, and the essence is beautiful! For New Russia!
    Thanks to the author!
  12. +3
    30 July 2014 14: 35
    I recognize New Russia. The UN is not a decree for me. The militia fighters also recognize, which means we are many.
    1. 0
      30 July 2014 14: 40
      Quote: Alex Nick
      I recognize New Russia.

      AND? When will you establish diplomatic relations with New Russia?
      1. 0
        30 July 2014 16: 05
        Sanya, do not jerk. Are you against it? It would be my will.
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 16: 06
          Quote: Alex Nick
          Are you against it?

          I am for, but at the level of Putin.
          1. +2
            30 July 2014 16: 11
            And I'm at the level of myself. Putin has many limitations, but I do not.
            1. 0
              31 July 2014 06: 23
              Quote: Alex Nick
              but I do not.

              At Putin’s level, a chuckler will be around the world, and at the level of you no one will scratch you hi
    2. 0
      30 July 2014 20: 21
      Are you a subject of international law?
  13. +2
    30 July 2014 14: 45
    I would not single out the leader. It is not a leader, but a mass of people who have been able to defend their interests.


    A mass of people without a leader is a crowd.
    А uncontrollable crowd, even the most patriotic, is chaos and destruction!
    1. torajiro
      -2
      30 July 2014 15: 03
      It was he who picked up such ideas from Lev Nikolaevich. He, too, in the novel "War and Peace" went out of his way to belittle the role of Kutuzov in the Patriotic War of 1812. Thank God that even his talent was not enough for this.
      1. +2
        30 July 2014 15: 35
        You are not right! Tolstoy showed the tragedy of war in general and for the country of our country in particular, and not the heroism of an individual person! So to speak, this is a strategic novel, not a tactical sketch! Therefore, he did not characterize Kutuzov either positively or negatively, but as a fact that at that moment there was such a military leader at the helm of the Russian army!
  14. +3
    30 July 2014 14: 54
    Glory to New Russia and the militias!
  15. 0
    30 July 2014 14: 55
    For such questions, you need to invite a serious analyst! I don’t know the answer, they themselves had to decide in 20 years, etc. In the 91st, everyone believed in the CIS, in normal economic, political, mutually respected relations, and so what? It was necessary to separate the regions and join the ruined and almost impoverished country?
  16. APS
    +1
    30 July 2014 14: 58
    Will and wondrous labor yield the will.
  17. 0
    30 July 2014 14: 58
    What is New Russia and what it will be
    ........... this issue will be decided by the Kremlin and the White House, the rest will be re-singing and dancing
  18. Password
    +1
    30 July 2014 14: 59
    I share the position of the author:
    "... it would be good bye consolidate the de facto state in the territories of Donetsk and Lugansk regions. Do not get involved in building up territories. It’s not about the amount of land, but about as a state precedent. "- my emphasis.

    Now - to withstand New Russia, then to achieve recognition, to restore destroyed by the war and to establish a peaceful life. Moreover, the quality of life in New Russia should be higher than in Ukraine. This will be the most powerful weapon in the process of its expansion.
  19. torajiro
    +1
    30 July 2014 14: 59
    NOVOROSSIA ... will go a long and difficult path of its formation, of course, with the support of RUSSIA. [/ Quote] More precisely, with the support of the People of Russia. We must be aware that, as a state, Russia is closer to the Ukrainian junta than to the people of our country and, moreover, to our relatives in the Donbass. The authorities have the same comprador bourgeoisie with all the ensuing consequences.
    1. blackberry
      +1
      30 July 2014 16: 07
      Quote: torajiro
      More precisely, with the support of the People of Russia. We must be aware that, as a state, Russia is closer to the Ukrainian junta than to the people of our country and, moreover, to our relatives in the Donbass. The authorities have the same comprador bourgeoisie with all the ensuing consequences.

      to understand you more accurately, it would be more appropriate to use the terms "government" instead of the term "state". "officials", "ruling elite" and something like that. Because the term state still means citizens + territory.
  20. Schweinsteiger
    -4
    30 July 2014 15: 29
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: vem
    Are you a specialist in international law?

    Judging by the nickname, he is special in football.

    And I am also fond of football.
    1. Air Force Captain
      +2
      30 July 2014 15: 42
      Then you didn’t get there!
  21. 0
    30 July 2014 15: 39
    "Will and labor", it smacks of some kind of concentration camp, because there is no mention of the people, and therefore their participation as a spokesman and creator, is only implied as a labor force, and it is not clear whose will
    1. dmb
      +1
      30 July 2014 16: 03
      Well, you can’t say everything in the slogan. But as far as socialism is concerned, it was he who was going to build in Novorossiya. Well, not for the sake of profits Akhmetova fights there Strelkov. This actually explains the lack of assistance from our state. Sanctions and arrests of accounts scare them a little, arrest is not confiscation, and even no one bothers to steal. But the bad example of Novorossiya, in terms of social justice and deprivation of those in power "honestly earned" assets, this is serious. Here you can spit on the declared construction of the "Russian world" and on "lifting Russia from its knees", which is actually being done in spite of the rituals of the Starikovs and the like.
  22. +1
    30 July 2014 16: 02
    New Russia within the borders of Lugansk and Donetsk regions, with a limited contingent of Russian troops in the territory (just in case), with its own currency, and at least the Russian standard of living. Then she will not stay within these boundaries for long. All that is needed will grow, the rest will be crowded.
  23. 0
    30 July 2014 16: 04
    May God allow the Southeast to defend their right, and how it will continue to be decided by them. Pravoseki themselves destroy their country, well, well, Caesar-Cesarean.
  24. Dad Sasha
    +2
    30 July 2014 16: 05
    The main law of any legal state is the Constitution. The Constitution of Ukraine says
    Article 73. The issues of changing the territory of Ukraine are exclusively resolved by an ALL-UKRAINIAN referendum.

    I, too, am not a connoisseur of international law and jurisprudence in general, but is it not this article that hides the junta before the world community regarding aggression against the LPR and the DPR? An all-Ukrainian referendum on the separation of the LPR and the DPR did not seem to be held. Maybe that's why Europe does not intervene in the internal conflict?
    I, like most sensible Russian-speaking people on the planet, support the formation of New Russia and the suppression of the fascist junta, I admire the courage of real men fighting in the Donbas for their independence from the Americans and their mongrels, but is this legal from a legal point of view? Explain, please, who understands! Thank.
  25. +1
    30 July 2014 16: 05
    Forgive me my darkness, but who is German Sadulayev, and why is he telling us about Novorossia? Nothing against the writer. But against euphoria! Not everything is so epic and poetic. And this is not a national liberation movement of Russians. These are residents of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, volunteers from Russia and not only fighting against Ukrainian Nazis, foreign mercenaries and Western European states and the United States united against Russia. And not so massive is the resistance of the local Kiev regime (including ethnic Russians). Out of several million people, no more than 20000 volunteers - this is significantly less. And among the volunteers, not all are local (to put it mildly). And yet, how, after everything that happened, will Novorossia remain part of Ukraine? How does a writer imagine this?
    If without emotions and cynically, then Russia does not need this war, this territory, this state. We would benefit from Ukraine with Donbas and Lugansk, a single and more or less stable, solvent. Now, after all the victims and among the militia, and most importantly among civilians, how do they now live together?
    Kiev clearly showed its inhuman, deceitful, vile and very inadequate essence. Rather, the essence predicted in meanness, lies and betrayal.
    In addition, the leadership of Ukraine has already led the country to an economic collapse. Ukraine is lying on a European table like a roast pig, and the NATO and US states are standing around with knife-forks and waiting for the cook Poroshenko-Yatsenyuk-Turchinov to invite them to cut themselves into pieces. And Donetsk and Lugansk in this single Ukrainian state will probably be the first pieces of a pig. Now the militias are fighting against this, not for a united, even federated Ukraine, but for an independent New Russia.
  26. Nika-10
    -15
    30 July 2014 16: 14
    The author of the article is uniform. There will be no New Russia; everyone is praying to God that the Girkin-Rifle-Beard and other employees of the Russian GRU will not get to the rest of the regions. Fed up with New Russia, listen to those who live there. I live in this same New Russia, which you persistently woo in Russia. Believe me, the vaccine against Russia has already been received, moreover, from Russia itself. Is there really more faith to the author of this crap than a resident of this region?
    1. +4
      30 July 2014 16: 49
      Quote: Nika-10
      The author of the article is uniform. There will be no New Russia; everyone is praying to God that the Girkin-Rifle-Beard and other employees of the Russian GRU will not get to the rest of the regions. Fed up with New Russia, listen to those who live there. I live in this same New Russia, which you persistently woo in Russia. Believe me, the vaccine against Russia has already been received, moreover, from Russia itself. Is there really more faith to the author of this crap than a resident of this region?


      There are leftists in every place request , however, we are not going to believe the "left" negative !
      1. 0
        30 July 2014 20: 31
        Outskirts will receive a full dose of vaccination from Russia in the period October 2014-March 2015, if, of course, it survives as a state, and not a rabble of Svidomo idiots !!!
    2. wk-083
      +1
      30 July 2014 17: 33
      Bullshit! Why do people flee to Russia? Because they don’t see the future in ukroin! You with such appeals to the censor, there they will throw you pluses!
    3. -1
      30 July 2014 20: 32
      Outskirts will receive a full dose of vaccination from Russia in the period October 2014-March 2015, if, of course, it survives as a state, and not a rabble of Svidomo idiots !!!
    4. 0
      30 July 2014 23: 29
      Let's see in spring the vaccination from the animal
    5. Atanda
      0
      31 July 2014 01: 36
      But they will get, Nick, oh how they get! ;)
  27. +1
    30 July 2014 16: 25
    I watched an interview with an MP of the LPR! She said that the possibility of adopting laws on the basis of a collective association is being considered in order to exclude the possibility of the appearance of oligarchs and any inequality in society.

    The idea is wonderful, because before the baptism of Rus was precisely democracy.
    The prince chose a respected by all residents, a strong, intelligent organizer-military leader. Because there was an equal footing!
  28. +1
    30 July 2014 16: 33
    Quote: Nika-10
    I live in this same New Russia, which you persistently woo in Russia.


    Another daughter of a Russian officer? what
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. 0
    30 July 2014 17: 33
    In Donetsk, the metro was built for about 40 years, in the mid-80s a metro control was built. In the early 90's, they planned the launch of the first branch of the railway station - Vetka - South Bus Station, but alas ... abzdy ...
  31. -1
    30 July 2014 17: 57
    But I saw such a picture on the streets of Pskov.
    1. 0
      30 July 2014 23: 24
      Need to repeat
    2. Atanda
      0
      31 July 2014 01: 50
      You know what, guys, there are two gays in the picture - asset and liability. A very provocative and ambiguous picture, also with the Aple logo! Not from a great mind pasted. Definitely.
  32. +1
    30 July 2014 20: 28
    international law will be reviewed by the winners of the 3rd World War - whoever has more clubs, he is right !!!
  33. bigfire
    +1
    30 July 2014 21: 10
    But in my opinion, those in power in Russia are afraid of the victory of the militia. The authority of the rebel leadership is overshadowed by many politicians.
  34. 0
    30 July 2014 21: 33
    Quote: Nika-10
    all pray to God that the Girkins-Riflemen-beards and other employees of the Russian GRU will not get to the rest of the regions. Tired of New Russia

    This is not the first time I have commented on this evil person. And every time he speaks from the whole people! Let it better explain: why did the oligarcho-fascists respond to the just (and innocent) demands of the people of Novorossia with their rights to their native language and democratic freedoms by bombing?
  35. Commissar
    +1
    30 July 2014 23: 29
    The head of the USA is dark-skinned, but there are no 28 heads of EU states? Genocide!
  36. 0
    31 July 2014 05: 09
    Politics is a superstructure of the economy. If there is order with the economy in New Russia, they will recognize it.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"