The Russian Foreign Ministry called the UN report on the Ukrainian events hypocritical and biased

92
The report, which was published by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Russian Foreign Ministry called biased and hypocritical, reports RIA News with reference to the statement of the representative of the department Alexander Lukashevich.



In particular, he said:
“We have carefully studied the fourth report already published by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the basis of information prepared by the United Nations Monitoring Mission on Human Rights in Ukraine. The main conclusion: the report is biased and even hypocritical. What is his key message that the Ukrainian government can legitimately use force in order to restore law and order in the east of the country? This actually justifies the operation carried out by Ukrainian punitive ".


According to Lukashevich, the document distorts some facts.
“Thus, it is alleged that Kiev launched a military campaign in response to the actions of the militias. In this connection, I would like to remind you that the local population has taken weapon in order to protect themselves and their families from ultranationalists and neo-Nazis, including those hired "
said the representative of the Foreign Ministry.

He also noted that “there was no place in the report to fix the fact that the Ukrainian army and the National Guard radicals used the Grad multiple salvo fire systems at least four times, resulting in the death of 16 people and injuring a significant number of civilians ... ".

Nevertheless, according to Lukashevich, "observers could not ignore some facts of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, as well as the brutal violence of the Kiev authorities, the concealment of which would have turned out to be a complete discredit to the mission."

“In particular, it is noted that it was the ignoring of the legitimate demands of the East of Ukraine for greater independence in matters of self-government and the possibility of using the native language to become the root cause of the current conflict”
noted the representative of the department.

The authors of the report did not ignore the “witch hunt” taking place in Ukraine.

“Kiev authorities detain everyone who is suspected of sympathizing with the militia, prohibit Russian TV channels and remove objectionable comments from social networks”- Lukashevich stated the facts. According to him, the document “talks about intolerance and extremism, attacks on members of ethnic and confessional minorities, facts of anti-Semitism”.

According to the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, observers are right in the fact that “amendments to the constitution of Ukraine should undergo widespread public discussion, and not be prepared in private.”

“However, in the report of the UN monitoring mission there is no main thing - the demand to immediately stop the punitive operation that the Kiev authorities are conducting against their people. Without this, talking about human rights in Ukraine loses all meaning. ”
sure Lukashevich.

Russia believes that UN efforts "should not be aimed at directly or indirectly justifying the violence perpetrated by the Ukrainian authorities, but at promoting a cease-fire and beginning Kiev’s dialogue with representatives of the East of the country in order to restore peace in the region."
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    92 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +56
      29 July 2014 15: 21
      Double standards in all its glory, the UN needs a fig if it is not objective in its judgments
      1. Vik.Tor
        +9
        29 July 2014 15: 26
        Finally they answered, it is necessary to continue this way, there will be more use than from silence.
        1. +37
          29 July 2014 15: 27
          Pan Gibon sucks at the smoked one without bending over. That's the whole story!
          I'm tired of hypocrisy and double standards, but probably not only I'm the only one!
          1. +4
            29 July 2014 16: 18
            You are not alone with you, many agree. Their impudent hypocrisy and purpose are the same, to crush Russia, it is hard to assert Russia’s self-assertion on the world stage, for more than 20 years no one has taken into account us, after the collapse of the USSR.
          2. 0
            29 July 2014 17: 19
            People, come here!
            https://secure.avaaz.org/ru/petition/Gensek_OON_Pan_Gi_Mun_Organizacii_gumanitar
            nogo_koridora_dlya_vyvoza_ranenyh_detey_s_YuV_Ukrainy /? axTYcib
            Everything is said there!
          3. +1
            29 July 2014 20: 06
            Quote: dr.Bo
            Pan Gibon sucks at the smoked one without bending over. That's the whole story!
            I'm tired of hypocrisy and double standards, but probably not only I'm the only one!

            In my opinion, since the founding of the UN, she has ovsky horseradish in her mouth. The only thing, the UN, is the rostrum with which the whole world can hear our country and, of course, the veto in the Security Council.
          4. +1
            29 July 2014 20: 44
            Quote: dr.Bo
            Pan Gibon sucks at the smoked one without bending over. That's the whole story!

            ATESS has created an analogue of the IMF - it is urgent to create the UN version of 2.
            THIS bl .... excuse me-DEAR ORGANIZATION-itself has long been obsolete, a sanctuary of the old type of Moon.
          5. +1
            30 July 2014 07: 03
            The UN Chairman studied in the USA and is a protege of the USA!
            Americans recruit at the level of presidents, even in infancy, and lead them through life, and we, for some reason, work at the level of whore Anna Chapman, and then we are surprised that we are not influencing anything!
        2. 0
          29 July 2014 18: 27
          And Vaska listens, but eats .....
      2. Vik.Tor
        +6
        29 July 2014 15: 28
        The UN headquarters is in the states, and whoever pays for the girl dances her.
        1. +7
          29 July 2014 16: 16
          Quote: Vik.Tor
          The UN headquarters is in the states, and whoever pays for the girl dances her.

          The UN has become a tool covering its owner.
          The UN has outlived itself and instead of the UN (United Nations Organization), it is necessary to create an SES (Slavic Organization of Nations) or a MON (World Organization of Nations) where each country has the right to vote equal to the area of ​​its state.
          1. pahom54
            0
            29 July 2014 16: 51
            for Irokez
            I agree with you, except for the last paragraph. Cause? Just many, precisely because of this point, due to the Bonapartist complex of small states, will not go to this organization ...
            The same Sierra Leone will scream: why does my voice weigh less than that of Russia-China_Mongolia-India ??? ...
            1. 0
              29 July 2014 17: 41
              Quote: pahom54
              The same Sierra Leone will scream: why does my voice weigh less than that of Russia-China_Mongolia-India ??? ...

              Then by population, or gross product. If you scream, it is reasonable to object, you are less, or you produce less. Will it be so honest?
          2. +2
            29 July 2014 17: 45
            Why is the criterion to evaluate the area? Why not average altitude, not population, not average life expectancy, not gross national product per capita, not corruption, etc. etc. ???
            1. -1
              29 July 2014 20: 47
              Quote: Homo sapiens
              Why is the criterion to evaluate the area? Why not average altitude, not population, not average life expectancy, not gross national product per capita, not corruption, etc. etc. ???

              Why by area - because:
              - The state is responsible for the controlled territory in the territory of which it exists.
              - the territory that is least polluted and pitted for mining and free from chemistry and GMOs is of the highest importance for the future of the Earth.
              - further subtle point of the fact that the territory is large - this means that the population and the leadership have fewer ambitions to capture someone. According to the principle “We don’t need someone else's, but we will not give our own,” which means that they are less prone to violence in the World in general and are more reasonable and wise.
              And if we take it on the basis of the number of people, it turns out that China and India will all ... send and imprison everything for themselves.
              It is clear that not only the country's area must be taken into account, but also the number of people, GDP and, most importantly, natural resources.
              And if in terms of corruption and democracy, then some kind of England and the same super democracy of the United States will again prevail along with the rest of Geyropa. UN to confirm and for example.
      3. +2
        29 July 2014 15: 28
        Quote: herruvim
        Double standards in all its glory, the UN needs a fig if it is not objective in its judgments

        I think this organization will perish as the "League of Nations" ...
        1. +5
          29 July 2014 16: 02
          The UN has already discredited itself so much that I personally do not see any point in it! The UN has actually turned into a prostitute supported by the FSA! The only more or less effective body is the UN Security Council, but this is far from a panacea! The FSA, as practice shows, even spits on the decisions of the Security Council when it is beneficial for them! I see no reason to play by all the rules with a sharper, especially if you know that he is a cheat, and he knows that you know about it (sorry, I stole a phrase from the movie "Special Forces")!
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +4
        29 July 2014 15: 32
        Quote: herruvim
        sure Lukashevich.

        Russia believes


        And these phrases should be fundamental. Stop listening to what they say to us. Russia, an independent state, and we should not look back that the Yankees will sing to us, the more we know their songs in advance. The truth is with us. Glory to Russia!
      6. +2
        29 July 2014 15: 37
        Quote: herruvim
        Double standards in all its glory

        They just wrote the report, dictated by Baiden and Kerry.
      7. +8
        29 July 2014 15: 38
        From the UN we need one thing - the veto, which allows us to block any hostile actions.
        1. +2
          29 July 2014 15: 48
          Quote: g1v2
          From the UN we need one thing - the veto, which allows us to block any hostile actions.

          Amers do not care about the veto. They will lie again and blame Russia.
          1. +1
            29 July 2014 16: 14
            Well, they will blame them anyway, but they will not be able to force, for example, Indians and Chinese to join the sanctions against us. And to resist informal actions is much easier.
        2. +4
          29 July 2014 15: 50
          From the UN we need one thing - the veto, which allows us to block any hostile actions.
          I would write the right to block OFFICIAL hostile actions, but unofficial ones like that, and the latter take the place of official ones more and more often without bothering ..
        3. +4
          29 July 2014 17: 20
          Quote: g1v2
          From the UN we need one thing - the veto, which allows us to block any hostile actions.

          Yeah ... the United States in 1989 - Panama raped in front of the whole world and what ??? AND NOTHING...
          Especially I quote extracts of the reaction of the UN and other "Sharashkin offices" to the invasion:

          After the invasion began, 15 member states of the UN Security Council voted to condemn the US invasion of Panama, but the United States, Britain and France used the veto to block the resolution. [47] Later, on December 29, 1989, at the 44th session of the UN General Assembly, a resolution was passed condemning the US invasion of Panama [48]. In support of the resolution, 75 states voted, 20 against, representatives of 40 countries did not vote [49] and demanded that the United States immediately stop the intervention and withdraw troops from Panama. In response, the US representative to the UN made a statement that during the military operation, the United States "realized the right to self-defense" [50].

          The Organization of American States condemned the US invasion of Panama and demanded the withdrawal of US troops from Panama. For the adoption of the resolution, 20 states voted, against - 1 (USA) [51]

          The EEC adopted a resolution expressing concern over US actions [52].

          The US invasion of Panama caused discontent and protests among the population and many governments of Latin America [53], the island states of the Caribbean [54] and other countries of the world, including the USSR, Libya and Australia [52].

          The Socialist Party adopted a resolution condemning the US invasion as a direct violation of international law [52].

          In the United States, 69 public and political figures (including politician J. McGovern, Senator J. Fulbright, writer E. L. Doctorow) signed an open letter to the US president in which they condemned the US invasion of Panama [55]. Also, the intervention was denounced by the National Council of Churches of the United States and the Council of the United Methodist Church of the United States [52]

          AND EVERYTHING! What SANCTIONS? What are you talking about? What Veto ???
      8. 0
        29 July 2014 15: 40
        Quote: herruvim
        Double standards in all its glory, the UN needs a fig if it is not objective in its judgments

        So the report was written in the State Department and agreed there with the UN. It is necessary to send all these UNs, OSCE, to withdraw from all treaties on all types of armaments. Let them chuck out then.
        1. 0
          29 July 2014 16: 02
          I agree. Moreover, all contracts are carried out by us alone.
      9. +3
        29 July 2014 15: 44
        After all, everyone understands that the UN did not fabricate this report to arouse indignation of the Russian Foreign Ministry, they wanted to spit on other people's opinions, they only need it to officially substantiate the UN anti-Russian resolution on the Ukrainian problem. Russia is struck one slap after another, its cheeks are already burning, I am very interested when Putin will crack his fist on the impudent, snickering, fucking, each time concessions, western face?
        1. APS
          +1
          29 July 2014 16: 07
          It seems soon, just a little remains. Soon there will be a finita la comedy. This is my guess and I really hope so. We are waiting for the latest EU sanctions and amers.
          1. 0
            29 July 2014 16: 31
            I'm sorry, but what is this?
            Quote: APS
            Coming soon will be a comedy
            like the Russian tricolor over the Pentagon, or more modest over Kiev (Brussels)? and then all the talk nevermind?
      10. +2
        29 July 2014 16: 07
        Mr. Pangisrun should be forced to watch a video like this before going to bed, his brain will not last long. Not the world, but the American-European garbage. And the Parashevsky children will continue to live with such acts of their dad.
        1. +2
          29 July 2014 17: 26
          It just doesn’t fit into consciousness, why did these people get killed? Pravoseki maydanutye, damn you! Animals and those are not able to do so in their pack. You are moral and burn you in Hell, you have sold to the beast under N-666.
      11. +1
        29 July 2014 16: 12
        Well, what would you like if the United Nations were the first to transfer helicopters to dill, without even having previously smeared the symbols of its organization. Double standards? Yes, stop it, there are no double standards, just the world has split into two halves. Adequate and independent, which has a future and a lie, saturated with Western propaganda and homosexual. The first is the BRICS countries (including potential members of this union), the second is the NATO countries. Each side has its own truth, only on whose side is the truth? I think the answer is clear
        1. 0
          29 July 2014 18: 33
          For the sake of justice - the UN has NO OWN technology.
      12. +1
        29 July 2014 16: 12
        The UN has long been turned into a division of the State Department, does not meet the tasks for which it was created, and needs deep reform.
      13. 0
        29 July 2014 16: 52
        The UN has long been the propaganda department of the fascinating "regional committee"!
      14. 0
        29 July 2014 16: 52
        If Russia sends troops to Ukraine, then the UN will cease to exist like the League of Nations!
      15. raccoon
        0
        29 July 2014 16: 57
        Quote: herruvim
        fig need OO

        Or maybe the UN headquarters will move from New York to ........... MOSCOW, or St. Petersburg? How do you people, such an idea!
      16. 0
        29 July 2014 17: 48
        The presidents of Latin America correctly said that the UN as a structure must be dispersed and re-created elsewhere ...............
      17. 0
        29 July 2014 20: 32
        This organization has long become obsolete, and is nothing of itself.
      18. 0
        29 July 2014 21: 56
        you say double standards but for me it's just an open and arrogant lie
      19. 0
        29 July 2014 23: 23
        Unfortunately, Russia is playing with the cards that were given to us - and all this nasty thing to do - and the duplicity of the West, and their meanness and so on ... apparently this is our fate. But just to spit on these scum does not work. God grant we get by with a little blood.
      20. +1
        30 July 2014 06: 58
        The UN is a branch of the State Department! But how much more will Russia be limited only to correct and wise words that no one else hears besides us ??
      21. 0
        30 July 2014 07: 09
        As children who are naive with this UN, you need to create your own ... ki only recognize force and until Russia sends everyone to x .. there will be no business.
    2. +3
      29 July 2014 15: 22
      one devil, the ringleaders "will not hear", and the rest - the language in the dupu
      1. +1
        29 July 2014 15: 38
        Quote: andrei332809
        one devil, the ringleaders "will not hear

        The instigators of this report and composed, voiced by others.
        1. 0
          29 July 2014 15: 44
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          The ringleaders of this report and composed

          Yes, I'm not talking about the report itself, but about the words of Lukashevich
    3. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 22
      Very diplomatically said, this is bullshit just with links to Twitter.
      1. zzz
        zzz
        +2
        29 July 2014 15: 26
        Quote: roman72-452
        Very diplomatically said, this is bullshit just with links to Twitter.

        It’s time to no longer talk very diplomatically. You need to shout to clear their ears. And hit the head to refresh the memory. Only shock therapy will bring them to life.
        1. +2
          29 July 2014 15: 42
          It’s time for Churkin to take off his shoes. One of the US representative Samantha Power to run, and the second on the podium to hammer and explain to everyone who licks at the obama in our native Russian language what they really are laughing
          1. +5
            29 July 2014 16: 05
            Churkin should be sent on vacation for a week, and instead send Vladimir Volfovich to the UN.
        2. 0
          29 July 2014 15: 42
          Quote: zzz
          It's time to not talk very diplomatically

          As we spoke, with the help of paper, so we will. ETOGES, partners, and you can’t offend them ...
    4. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 22
      The UN is dancing under the mattress covers, nothing surprising.
    5. Andskobka
      +1
      29 July 2014 15: 25
      N-nda ... UN, either blind or dancing to the tune of the Anglo-Axes ... Rather, the second ...
      1. 0
        29 July 2014 16: 35
        they play () the tune of the English-Max
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. 0
      29 July 2014 15: 26
      “However, in the report of the UN monitoring mission there is no main thing - the demand to immediately stop the punitive operation that the Kiev authorities are conducting against their people. Without this, talking about human rights in Ukraine loses all meaning. ”

      So, as the owner ordered from the white house, so the report was cooked up. The UN has long been discredited by its double standards. It's no secret that they are dancing to the tune of phasington.
    8. 0
      29 July 2014 15: 26
      The UN has long been the mouthpiece of the United States, there is nothing to expect from them.
    9. +15
      29 July 2014 15: 27
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/121/sdfc9.jpg
      1. +4
        29 July 2014 16: 28
        Something like that!
    10. +3
      29 July 2014 15: 28
      The UN has been dancing to the tune of the United States for a long time, not long left, Putin will replace the UN.
    11. 0
      29 July 2014 15: 28
      UN? Sharashkina office.
      1. 0
        29 July 2014 16: 43
        Quote: Signal
        UN? Sharashkina office.

        In sharashka then they did at least something useful, but here only monologues ...
    12. +3
      29 July 2014 15: 29
      The UN degenerated into a department of the State Department, the time came for its dissolution or radical reconstruction ...
    13. Rayden
      +3
      29 July 2014 15: 30
      Tired of this circus, everyone is dancing to the tune of pi .... owls, what world community? even if they deny the trivial facts. And then they say that we have paranoia due to Russophobia
    14. +2
      29 July 2014 15: 30
      A classic example of how the victory was taken away from us.
      The UN was created by the victorious countries after the Second World War, the role of our country in victory is key, and the Americans enjoy the fruits.
    15. +2
      29 July 2014 15: 33
      the league of nations was covered with a copper basin before the war ..... I did not want to hold parallels but it seems World War 3 is just around the corner ....
    16. 0
      29 July 2014 15: 35
      we must give up on membership in this fucking organization. Immortal words from the comedy of the same name come to mind: - "... this radish will give us up at the first jump ..." Some kind of turmoil will begin and these will definitely be against us. At this stage, we no longer need them. Churkin has done his job, Churkin can leave ...
    17. Tomsoer
      +3
      29 July 2014 15: 35
      Everyone understands everything ... And about double standards, and about "who is dancing to whose tune" ... One thing is unclear - if half of the world has already sold out against us, then why are those who happily shook the hand of GDP and accepted "gifts" in in the form of writing off debts and concluded contracts. Our restraint and composure, of course, freezes the west, but the east is in no hurry to do its bit either ... And this is sad!
    18. nvb
      nvb
      +1
      29 July 2014 15: 37
      Some kind of deja vu, everything like this already happened, but I remembered the 30s of the last century. Sadly.
    19. 0
      29 July 2014 15: 40
      Quote: herruvim
      Double standards in all its glory, the UN needs a fig if it is not objective in its judgments

      Who is in the know? before the UN was the League of Nations, for what reason did it disappear? Can the United Nations remove the same
    20. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 40
      All words, words, words and notes of protest ....
      What is a step, an act of men (besides Crimea) we will see ????
    21. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 42
      The UN has long been a garbage dump.
    22. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 45
      The UN has long become the pocket dog of the SGA. It is foolish for the world community and Russia to hope for a fair and adequate assessment of any conflict, situation. Russia, together with other BRICS countries and all comers (tired of the uniformity of world politics, offended by the Americans) should create a truly independent organization that prioritizes justice and international law.
      PS Yes, and for a long time Russia should stop explaining itself to the West at the UN or somewhere else. It looks as if Russia is making excuses.
    23. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 46
      It has long been known that the UN protects the interests of the United States and the world oligarchy. One thing is not clear why for our sake they have become attached to the UN. They are trying to prove something, appeal to the UN resolutions, they want to solve something there with the help of the UN. Once again, I repeat in my statements, THERE ARE SOLUTION IS FORCE IN THE WORLD !!! It's a shame, for so many years they tried to kiss the West, and it was necessary to strengthen the Army and the economy. As a result, they now beat our lips !! 10 years ago I read analytical articles of people who were devoted to the secrets of the world development of Western countries and ours too. So there, it was written that sooner or later there would be a protest of East and West, right down to the military !! Well !! survived to these times !! ORASES were right.
    24. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 53
      Sorry for off topic (Russian spring)
      Summary from the militia Prokhorov.

      “In Avdeevka (north of Donetsk) - as expected, the Ukrainians completely abandoned the village, but now they are attacking Yasinovataya.
      Started shelling Gorlovka.
      By interceptions - Ukrainians consider the most “partisan-dangerous” region near Dzerzhinsk (glory to the Gorlov brothers!) Riots against mobilization across Ukra are expanding. ”
    25. +1
      29 July 2014 15: 55
      What kind of UN is this if she doesn’t even want to use her efforts to protect an individual nation. Also looks into the mouth of the landlords? Are you probably renting apartments in New York? request
    26. +5
      29 July 2014 15: 56
      Well, if everything is "good", then maybe the UN will take upon itself the solution of the problems of refugees from Ukraine? Let them fork out.
      1. +1
        29 July 2014 16: 14
        Quote: Rods
        Well, if everything is "good", then maybe the UN will take upon itself the solution of the problems of refugees from Ukraine? Let them fork out.

        But these are not refugees. These are tourists, they just "breathe mountain air", and they have no problems. What can be the solution for them. All these "notes", "statements", "protests" are water and no one hears them, probably not even reads them. Soon in the west, toilet paper makers will go broke.
    27. 0
      29 July 2014 16: 00
      everyone understands that the UN is a screen. as it was recently written in one of the articles, the UN, the EU are whores !!!!
      the question is that everyone is afraid of the one who stands behind the UN and the EU, and behind all the lawlessness on the planet. It is the source that needs to be "addressed", not the consequences!
      Hence, I don’t understand the following: why we never act on the destruction of our main eternal enemy !? I understand that the creation of the BRICS bank, not a clear alliance with China, are all links in one chain. But everything is too slow. The enemy is on the doorstep. Ukraine is on fire. I know, I live in her! why are there no purges of fucking liberals? why not cut off these scum heads? why so frankly scum like PONAMAREV not cut off his tongue, do not put him in the throat, and a grenade in his bosom ???? WHAT MU? and this cattle is already convening a movement in favor of the independence of SIBERIA !!! no, well, have you heard that?
      Putin has carte blanche in his hands. will start to cry about violations of the rights of the chelvok? but doesn’t it matter already, when they beat openly, they are lying impudently !!! why do we know our weak points, do not eliminate them ???? I don’t understand this!
      1. 0
        29 July 2014 16: 09
        oh, they already prepared so many marches, but there’s no sense and the people won’t go for it, well, they’ll collect a couple of thousand, it’s all over ...
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 12: 47
          it’s not that nothing will come of it. The fact. that such cattle walk on Russian land. hire some kind of gop, cut a bogeyman and everything. it’s really rare shit! after his death will only get better!
          it's certainly cruel, but life is like that!
      2. +2
        29 July 2014 16: 11
        Yes, Ponomarev needs to be driven with a SANNA rag from all the places where he appears.
        1. sled beach
          0
          29 July 2014 16: 19
          It’s easier once to create and be sure of the future, but still Christians. We warm the snakes on the chest.
      3. wanderer_032
        0
        29 July 2014 17: 48
        Siberia is ours, and we will give pendals to all Ponomarevs.
        It will fly right up to Antactida, let the penguins push their heresy there.
    28. 0
      29 July 2014 16: 05
      The High Commissioner from the State Department is well fed and has been at his feet since the creation of the United Nations ...
    29. 0
      29 July 2014 16: 09
      The "civilized" world is "pumping up" the situation around Russia. Against the background of 17 trillion in debt and the struggle for resources, only Russia and China can offer real resistance. On the eve of World War II, the "League of Nations" (the predecessor of the UN) showed its helplessness in solving global problems, as a result, fascism was nurtured and directed against the USSR. In this case, the US allows RUIN to commit lawlessness in Donbass, and the UN, in turn, does not actually have its own position ... In a word, Russia is facing a serious test, like the USSR did in its time. There is a lot to do http://worldcrisis.ru/crisis/1584472 to resist us and Win.
    30. Password
      0
      29 July 2014 16: 18
      Dialogue is hardly possible from the positions on which the parties stand.

      Different goals, if not diametrically opposed:
      The United States needs resources, territory and a puppet-obedient Ukrainian government.
      Russia needs a buffer - Novorossiya, in order to protect itself as much as possible from the emerging threats from the United States and NATO.
    31. +2
      29 July 2014 16: 25
      This UN has been ... for a long time ... In 1950, when the conflict broke out in Korea, between the North and the South, the USSR supported the North, and the FSA with their puppets harnessed to the South ... and the UN Security Council decided to send troops 21 states (headed by the FSA of course) to Korea ... and a war for three years. Between the USSR and the UN, to put it mildly, there was dislike then ... A cartoon from the Krokodil magazine of those years, Stalin said in small words: “In fact, the UN is now not so much a world organization as an organization for the Americans, acting for the needs of the American aggressors. " From the conversation of Comrade I. V. Stalin with a Pravda correspondent, 1951.
    32. 0
      29 July 2014 16: 29
      Quote: herruvim
      Double standards in all its glory, the UN needs a fig if it is not objective in its judgments

      The UN is needed, but reformed, independent of the influence of superpowers. UN headquarters need to pick up a different location, not in Fashington. It is worth remembering that the UN passes in its existence (as in its time the Ling of Nations) all phases of development right up to liquidation. Such a sad outcome is possible in the absence of timely reform of the Organization.
    33. 0
      29 July 2014 16: 31
      Until we throw off the cult of the dollar, everything will continue like this. Words are no use fighting it. Respect only power.
    34. sled beach
      0
      29 July 2014 16: 31
      the feature of the game in Europe is to create the illusion that almost now Europe will come to its senses and see all the injustices of what is happening. For this reason, the reliable facts of what is happening are periodically thrown into the European media, and it seems that Europe already sees everything, but this is a divorce.
    35. mgn1802
      0
      29 July 2014 16: 41
      Yes, it is now obvious that the Pindo-politicians have long and carefully prepared the Nazi-Ukrainian provocation. All the so-called experts and analysts, including the UN experts, who could be bribed or intimidated, were bribed or intimidated. But it is one thing to assent to phishington, and it is another to present objective information and facts to the world. With this, they will now have more and more problems, for one lie inevitably gives rise to another greater one, and so on to infinity. And now they will constantly build up a river of outright lies against Russia in order to at least somehow justify their actions. But sooner or later it starts to annoy everyone! Lying is actually a striking symptom of anger - in this case, the anger of the so-called Western civilization. It is impossible to build a long-term policy on a lie. You can only stretch time, delay the collapse, which apparently they are trying to do. But at the same time, the citizens of the BRICS countries (and this is essentially half the world's population!) Are increasingly understanding who the real aggressor is and the source of all wars in recent years. So, the split in the world community into two camps will inevitably increase according to the principle: on the one hand, the lied and presumptuous west, and on the other, the developing countries of all other parts of the world. And Russia is compelled and simply obliged to become the ideological and economic center of anti-Americanism. This is expected of us in the world, history obliges us to this (sorry for the easy pathos, but in this case it is justified)!
    36. +2
      29 July 2014 16: 43
      What is the toothless response of our Foreign Ministry to the accusations of the UN ...
      No, to send this report to x ... and invite the world community to provide an opportunity for any journalist to personally visit the place of conflict - for free, at our expense, under our protection.
      Let them see for themselves.
      And the UN gang to answer - do not put yourself in anything.
      It’s time to get out of all the contracts that limit us. To whom are these pieces of paper a decree?
      1. slava11
        -4
        29 July 2014 16: 49
        So I did not understand, Putin is still a man or just as always?
        1. nvv
          nvv
          +1
          29 July 2014 17: 23
          Glory, surname, it is customary with us, it is written with a capital letter. Moreover, the president. Judging by the comments, on the next branch, it seemed that you were a man. It turns out you are an ordinary mongrel, like an ordinary dill, wandered to this site.
      2. 0
        29 July 2014 17: 59
        It has long been clear that the sovereignty of Russia cannot be achieved by semi-liberal methods ala Gorbachev and Yeltsin. At any stage of state transformation, a strong will is needed. Stalin purges are needed. Otherwise, you cannot cleanse and transform shit. There is not a single case in the history of the successful transformation of the state by a liberal leader.
        Liberalism is possible only in periods of success and prosperity!
        What nah liberalism during a period of overwhelming hostile encirclement, but in fact an undeclared war!


        Two reasons to recognize the DNR-LC
        Taking advantage of Kiev’s refusal of access by the accused party (RF) to the investigation of the crash, it’s time to ultimately recognize the DPR to access the scene of the accident. For success in the investigation should change the rhetoric in the EU and the support of the UK.
        Substantial occasion, accusations of Kiev and the entire international community!
        Which in the future will help and implement humanitarian and military assistance to protect civilians.


        Since the international red cross recognized the actions of Ukraine in the Donbass as a war and voiced the number of victims, it is worth embodying the proposal of Vitaliy Tretyakov:
        To deliver an ultimatum to Ukraine, with new victims of the civilian population, to recognize the LPR - the DPR, which will allow providing humanitarian, military-technical and other assistance to prevent civilian victims.
    37. 0
      29 July 2014 16: 45
      Obama - P * ndossky! You are already 16. Well, you turn your pockets out of your little ones, but why the hell are you killing so many high school students? Grandparents do not count, but still. It's ugly like that. What do people think about you? You really reeducate. We are even ashamed of ourselves for you. Oh well! hi Diplomacy is still that little thing.
    38. +1
      29 July 2014 16: 47
      Here is another "crocodile" caricature of the UN, which essentially reflects its corrupt nature. negative(clickable)
    39. +1
      29 July 2014 16: 52
      On this site, you no longer need to persuade and agitate. Everyone understands! These sites in the face of American coves will never back down from their plans. Think, gentlemen, for so many years working hard to achieve only one thing - to lower and defeat Russia as low as possible !!!
      But will they forgive us at least the Crimea ???
      Never, in their understanding, in their worthless life!
      The emperor of Russia was right, we have only two allies
      OUR ARMY AND THE Navy !!!!
    40. -1
      29 July 2014 17: 00
      Quote: slava11
      So I did not understand, Putin is still a man or just as always?


      ADDRESS TO THE ADMINISTRATION:
      IN THE FORM OF THE PARTICIPATED CASES OF REGISTRATION OF "COSSACKS" OF DIFFERENT KINDS AND THEY "ROLLING" INTO A NEGATIVE RATING, FROM WHAT THEIR PURPOSE IS CLEARLY SEE (disunity of society, general anger) AND TOOLS (active trolling of everyone and everything).
      I ASK THE DATA OF INDIVIDUALS TO SEND TO THE ETERNAL BAN, THANKS.
    41. s1н7т
      +4
      29 July 2014 17: 02
      UN, UN ... Nobody remembers with whom we fought in Korea? Not with the United States or Australia there, I remember. We fought there with UN peacekeepers. Oh how! Right now we won’t be sent here again?
    42. 0
      29 July 2014 17: 05
      The Americans are an extraterrestrial civilization that believes in its exceptionalism until then, without an eye, the Russian boot crashes them in the balls.
    43. 0
      29 July 2014 17: 12
      once again I’ll have to prove to Western civilization that THEY are wrong .. it’s a pity that again through our sweat, blood, life ... that's fate ...
    44. +1
      29 July 2014 17: 12
      The UN, as an international organization for world peace, no longer exists as such. It is a dirty US gasket for the US State Department in the international political arena to advance its interests. The Europeans are trying to resist the mattress and their vassals in their hegemony Russia, China and some countries of South America. But this is just a confrontation like playing football, Argentina Jamaica 5-0. It's time for Russia to create an alternative organization based on the BRICS as a counterbalance to all this monopoly. Fighting with weapons is one thing and not everyone wants to "butt" with Russia, but we are losing propaganda and the situation in the world.
    45. 0
      29 July 2014 17: 36
      Yes, how much water can be crushed in a mortar! All the same !!!!! Our diplomacy is at a steep peak, since from 90 years old they got there for a lot of money, children of the current oligarchs! They sifted and drunk Russia the current speckled deck, plundered everything, drank everything that is possible and here is the result- WAR !!!!!!
      1. +3
        29 July 2014 17: 52
        Quote: azbukin77
        Yes, how much water can be crushed in a mortar! Everything is one and the same !!!!! Our diplomacy is at a steep peak, since from 90 years they got there for a lot of money, children of the current oligarchs

        And before that, children of party nomenclature got there ... horseradish radish, if sweeter, then not much.
        1. 0
          29 July 2014 19: 38
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          And before that, children of party nomenclature got there ..

          And before that there was Gromyko, a native of a Belarusian village. The "partners" called him Mr. "No", but they respected him immensely. There is little respect for Mr. "Concern".
    46. 0
      29 July 2014 17: 57
      It is time for Russia, China, India, Latin and Central American countries, as well as other states that are FREE from US nonsense to think seriously about creating a single organization - an antagonist of the existing UN! And if the UN "does not want", then this (other) organization will act as the Keeper of Peace.
    47. sergeybulkin
      +1
      29 July 2014 18: 02
      UN. UN. A long time ago and in Ltd. UN, as everywhere else in the world of politics, everything is sold and everything is bought. If it is not bought, it is forced through blackmail, and whole states are subjected to blackmail. Do not vote as we want, we will not give credit, help, etc. You yourself understand the strong always has something to squeeze the weak.
      It has long been necessary to exclude the arrogant Saxons from the UN - the United States and England, they have already ceased to be democracies, and to investigate their crimes against humanity and draw the appropriate conclusions.
    48. +1
      29 July 2014 18: 19
      There will be no dialogue with banderlogs. After the loss of Crimea, Potroshenko will do everything to return the south-east of Ukraine to his jurisdiction, and he does not care how many people die there, his own Ukrainians, because a priori he recorded them all as terrorists. Such as he, like Lyashko, Turchynov, Yatsenyukh and others. It is necessary to shoot like mad dogs without trial, as he comes around and responds. All of them will soon leave the long-suffering Ukraine saving their skins abroad, leaving the Ukrainian people in complete ruin and hatred for each other, and only Great Russia will once again lend a helping hand to its fraternal native Ukrainian people. Insight is coming soon. Hold on to the militias. Glory to the militias and all those who support them in the fight against the fascist junta.
      1. 0
        29 July 2014 19: 41
        Quote: vasilek
        he does not care how many people die there, his own Ukrainians

        Yes, he does not consider them for the Ukrainians, but the Kremlin for the Russians. We want something else from the UN.
    49. +2
      29 July 2014 18: 23
      The UN has long outlived itself as an organ of all nations. This is just an elite club hosted by the United States. Why spend money, time and effort on membership in this one-sided organization, fully controlled by the United States.

      It is necessary to create a new organization for countries that do not recognize a unipolar world. Let it be at the beginning with a small number of members, but withdrew from the UN and not recognizing its world organization.
      Now knock, don’t knock a boot on the UN rostrum, they still won’t hear you.

      But besides the UN and many other world organizations and courts, hiding behind a sign of democracy, they completely discredited themselves in the eyes of the world community.
      As long as there is a unipolar world, the primacy of US interests will be inherent in all of them.

      The USA is the # 1 enemy of the entire world community.
    50. +1
      29 July 2014 18: 23
      To disperse all this to hell - the UN, the OSCE and more ...
      1. Alex 241
        +5
        29 July 2014 18: 31
        August 2 in Moscow !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    51. +1
      29 July 2014 18: 32
      Quote: vasilek
      All of them will soon leave long-suffering Ukraine to save their skins abroad

      they started in '91...why should they leave? More precisely, instead of them again, someone new is the same...
    52. +3
      29 July 2014 18: 38
      The Russian Foreign Ministry called the UN report on the Ukrainian events hypocritical and biased

      I wonder if our Ministry of Concern is now being heard by anyone other than themselves... smile
      And why, they are puffing up. Today we once again demanded that our territory not be shelled. I don’t even remember the umpteenth time.
    53. MSA
      MSA
      +1
      29 July 2014 18: 40
      Die all American creatures...
    54. +2
      29 July 2014 18: 47
      Do you think the slingshot will be effective against the T-90? So I think not. And our Foreign Ministry does nothing but churn out notes of protest and express “concerns.” This is all you need to say to a deaf person in the back... But it is necessary, since they have problems with hearing, to speak to the forehead and with a fist. So that it gets to your pants. Just soooo.
    55. 0
      29 July 2014 18: 57
      They piss in their eyes, they are “God’s dew.” laughing
      (popular wisdom)
    56. +4
      29 July 2014 18: 59
      Russia believes that UN efforts “should be aimed not at directly or indirectly justifying the violence perpetrated by the Ukrainian authorities, but at promoting a ceasefire and starting a dialogue between Kyiv and representatives of the country’s East in order to restore peace in this region.”

      The UN ceased to be an international organization of nations, but began to serve as an international mouthpiece for the policies of the United States and its henchmen. Therefore, UN efforts cannot be aimed “at promoting a ceasefire and starting a dialogue between Kyiv and representatives of the East of the country in order to restore peace in this region,” since this contradicts the interests of the American masters
    57. hasanov8383
      +1
      29 July 2014 20: 14
      I propose moving the UN headquarters to some completely neutral country.
    58. +1
      29 July 2014 20: 20
      Quote: Russ69
      russ69 (4) Today, 18:38
      The Russian Foreign Ministry called the UN report on the Ukrainian events hypocritical and biased

      The UN goats should now go to Donetsk or Lugansk and read out their report in front of people...
    59. kelevra
      +1
      29 July 2014 20: 35
      It was necessary to state this in a harsh and rude manner so that everyone could see that there is no point in playing with Russia!
    60. 0
      29 July 2014 20: 51
      Ministry of Concern, throwing protests and concerns smile
    61. 0
      29 July 2014 21: 17
      Almost all of these people from the UN think that WAR will not come to THEM. It is in vain that they think so in vain.
    62. +1
      29 July 2014 21: 49
      Gentlemen, we don’t need such a UN.
    63. 0
      29 July 2014 22: 45
      Quote: herruvim
      Double standards in all its glory, the UN needs a fig if it is not objective in its judgments

      That's why I put a minus. How much can you prove to them where is white and where is black if they don’t open their eyes! How much can you exhort if your ears are plugged and you don’t want to listen and ignore you? It's just time to put the UN in its place.
    64. +1
      29 July 2014 22: 46
      Quote: Irokez
      WON (World Organization of Nations) where each country has voting rights equal to the area of ​​its state.

      Why not based on the number of people? Japan, for example, does not have much area, but the population is healthy! But the merits of the state and its people in the pursuit of peace, humanism and justice should not be taken into account?
    65. 0
      29 July 2014 23: 29
      Whoever pays dances...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"