Military Review

According to the United States, the Russian Federation violated the Treaty on the Elimination of Medium and Short Range Missiles

168
Washington said that Moscow had violated the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF) by testing ground-based cruise missiles (CRNB). Reports about it RIA "News" with reference to the newspaper New York Times.


According to the United States, the Russian Federation violated the Treaty on the Elimination of Medium and Short Range Missiles


According to a high-ranking source in the US administration, Russia was notified of this by a special letter sent on Monday.

It is also noted that in the near future, the US State Department will publish an official statement with accusations against Russia, included in the annual report on international compliance with arms control agreements.

"The United States found that the Russian Federation violated obligations under the INF Treaty not to test, not to produce and not to deploy CRRN (ground-based cruise missiles) with a range of 500 kilometers to 5,5 thousands of kilometers," - quotes from the newspaper report.

Earlier, the New York Times stated that the test of a new cruise missile, conducted by Russia in 2008, could be, in the opinion of the United States, a violation of the INF Treaty. State Department spokesman Jen Psaki noted that Washington raised the issue of a possible breach of the contract in negotiations with Moscow, but did not conclude that it really took place. Then Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declined to comment on this publication.

In accordance with the INF Treaty, the parties committed themselves not to produce, not to test and deploy ballistic and ground-based cruise missiles of medium (1000-5500 km) and shorter (500-1000 km) range. They also had to destroy all launchers and ground-based missiles within three years.
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
168 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. industries_88
    industries_88 29 July 2014 10: 26
    +92
    And further it is necessary to violate) in the conditions of the compression ring only arm. And no need to look back. Won North Korea, builds its missiles, tests, builds power. Yes, all around screaming that the villains, so what? They will yell anyway. I believe that the answer should always be an order of magnitude greater than the damage done. For an eye, you need to take not only an eye, but also break your ears and legs.
    1. schizophrenic
      schizophrenic 29 July 2014 10: 29
      +28
      They themselves violate. Now otmazon looking like with a Boeing. am
      1. volodyk50
        volodyk50 29 July 2014 11: 26
        +22
        The United States with its "missile defense" is laying around Russia from all sides, which means we have violated the treaty.
        17 September 2009, Obama said that now the main bet is on the mobile missile defense system, deployed in the Mediterranean, Baltic and Black Seas and in several European countries.
        Thus, the distances to Moscow were even further reduced - the flight time of the SM-3 missiles of the mobile missile defense system is even less than that of the GBI "interceptors". Already now, when deployed at the Manas base (Bishkek), SM-3 Block IB anti-missiles are available: Magnitogorsk (target 4 - 1.639 km), Perm (target 5 - 2.111 km), Yekaterinburg (target 11 - 1.841 km), Omsk (target 1 - 1.348 km), Urengoy (target 7 - 2.578 km), Khanty-Mansiysk (target 12 - 2.050 km), Novokuznetsk (target 9 - 1.518 km), Andjero-Sudzhensk (target 10 - 1.679 km), Bratsk ( target 8 - 2.418 km), Irkutsk (target 2 - 2.440 km)

        Please tell me what is it called? This is the very base that supposedly was closed this month, and which is used for air transportation of passengers and cargo to and from Afghanistan (on military transport aircraft C-17) and refueling in the air (tankers KC-135) in the sky over Afghanistan . Why are they taking it over there? The authorities of Kyrgyzstan do not have permission to inspect the country imported from the United States. Everything functions under embassy status. There is also the right to shoot to kill.

        more details can be read here
        http://topwar.ru/41730-pro-pro.html - Про «ПРО»
        1. supertiger21
          supertiger21 29 July 2014 12: 21
          +10
          Double standards will not pass stop angry ! What we want, we will violate, and the fact that this is beyond the ocean, someone does not like - NOT THEIR DOG CASE ... tongue wassat negative
        2. vladmetro
          vladmetro 29 July 2014 13: 41
          +2
          Quote: volodyk50
          Please tell me what is it called?

          It's called double standards, son! wink
          1. Rom14
            Rom14 30 July 2014 06: 07
            0
            This is called a bitch howl .., and the standard is always the same, then it is the standard ...
      2. bulvas
        bulvas 29 July 2014 12: 54
        +9
        Quote: schizophrenic
        They themselves violate. Now otmazon looking like with a Boeing. am



        Russia in 1987 made a joke about the limitation of missiles, just as the United States joked about the non-proliferation of NATO to the east



        1. kergudu straight
          kergudu straight 29 July 2014 13: 00
          +4
          Quote: bulvas
          Quote: schizophrenic
          They themselves violate. Now otmazon looking like with a Boeing. am



          Russia in 1987 made a joke about the limitation of missiles, just as the United States joked about the non-proliferation of NATO to the east

          So now they are wandering for geyvropu, it's time for our major, who forgot to destroy the missiles, to assign the major general
      3. TUNISIA
        TUNISIA 29 July 2014 12: 56
        +5
        Washington said that Moscow violated the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF) by testing a ground-based cruise missile (CRNB).


        And what? You can sue us hi
      4. AVV
        AVV 29 July 2014 14: 56
        +2
        Quote: schizophrenic
        They themselves violate. Now otmazon looking like with a Boeing. am

        Whose cow mumbled, their missiles violate this very treaty, but they want to convict us !!! As always from a bad mind to a healthy one !!! There is nothing to negotiate with America at all about, it’s still a crook !!!
      5. yushch
        yushch 29 July 2014 18: 08
        +1
        Quote: schizophrenic
        They themselves violate. Now otmazon looking like with a Boeing. am

        Greetings to Banana Obama from the Country in which we all want to sanction him.
    2. Gxash
      Gxash 29 July 2014 10: 30
      +21
      More needs to be done and placed at the border. Let Obama and Co ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. Civil
      Civil 29 July 2014 10: 31
      +39
      Well then, it's time to get out of this INF Treaty, a meaningless restriction
      1. Lantau
        Lantau 29 July 2014 10: 38
        +16
        I'm interested in something else. And how did they install? Have you looked at YouTube?
      2. nvv
        nvv 29 July 2014 10: 38
        +7
        Russian Foreign Ministry Sergey Lavrov declined to comment on this publication.

        Yes, he sawed on these publications. I, too.
      3. Andrei K
        Andrei K 29 July 2014 11: 06
        +11
        This agreement is not very beneficial for Russia and, quite the opposite, for the United States. It is not clear why he generally concluded at one time. But now, just the right time to come out of it unilaterally. And US statements can simply be ignored, just as they do when it is beneficial to them.
        1. Igor39
          Igor39 29 July 2014 11: 12
          +8
          Hello from Gorbachev! For years to come.
        2. DMB-88
          DMB-88 29 July 2014 11: 20
          +18
          Quote: Andrei K
          This agreement is not very beneficial for Russia and, quite the opposite, for the United States. It is not clear why he generally concluded at one time. But now, just the right time to come out of it unilaterally. And US statements can simply be ignored, just as they do when it is beneficial to them.


          This treacherous treaty was signed by Judah-Gorbachev. The latest missile systems, including the magnificent Oka complex, were launched under the knife.
          the consequences of this treaty are the capture by NATO forces of all of Europe, including the republics of the former USSR.
          1. andj61
            andj61 29 July 2014 12: 39
            +3
            Quote: DMB-88
            This treacherous treaty was signed by Judah-Gorbachev. The latest missile systems, including the magnificent Oka complex, were launched under the knife.
            the consequences of this treaty are the capture by NATO forces of all of Europe, including the republics of the former USSR.

            You'd better remember the RSD-10 15P157 Pioneer-3 medium-range mobile missile system - this particular complex was the main victim of the treaty.
            The operational-tactical missile system 9K714 "Oka" was a kind of "makeweight", it did not fit under the treaty, but, nevertheless, it was "reduced".
        3. persei333
          persei333 29 July 2014 11: 24
          +3
          I remember very well how it was concluded, on television, at least. I believe that the agreement is completely unprofitable for Russia, since we have and had an advantage in terms of RSD and operational-tactical missiles and tactical. (Pioneer, Oka-now- Iskander, etc.). Nefig listen to them and comply with the contract.
          1. andj61
            andj61 29 July 2014 12: 40
            0
            Quote: persei333
            I think that the agreement is completely disadvantageous for Russia, since we have and had an advantage in terms of RSD and operational-tactical missiles and tactical ones (Pioneer, Oka-now-Iskander, etc.).

            In terms of RSD, we have no advantages at all - we do not have land-based missiles of this class: all are reduced.
        4. bulvas
          bulvas 29 July 2014 12: 31
          0
          Quote: Andrei K
          This agreement is not very beneficial for Russia and, quite the opposite, for the United States. It is not clear why he generally concluded at one time. But now, just the right time to come out of it unilaterally. And US statements can simply be ignored, just as they do when it is beneficial to them.



          I hope the army is now arming for real, and not like the news reports:

          industry has supplied two TWO missile systems to the troops, and by the end of the year they plan to supply three more ...


        5. aleks 62
          aleks 62 29 July 2014 12: 35
          0
          ....Correctly!!!!! Lie on them big and fat !!!! wassat
      4. 222222
        222222 29 July 2014 11: 20
        +1
        ..Civil (3) RU Today, 10:31 ↑ New
        Well, okay, it's time to get out of this RIAC, .. "
        .and not only the agreement on the INF Treaty .. hague, security and other offices ..
    4. Mahmut
      Mahmut 29 July 2014 10: 37
      +22
      Russia has not violated this agreement. If you use the terminology of the United States in relation to yourself, your loved ones, then it is correct to say this: "Russia withdrew from the treaty unilaterally." Moreover, this treaty was concluded by the USSR in 1987. Not Russia.
      1. Kibalchish
        Kibalchish 29 July 2014 10: 59
        +1
        Yes, this is another horror story for Europe, so that the next package of sanctions and missile defense shove.
        1. aleks 62
          aleks 62 29 July 2014 12: 36
          0
          ..... Looks like a good rocket happened .... If the Americans howled ... wassat
      2. 1goose3
        1goose3 29 July 2014 21: 58
        0
        Moreover, this contract was concluded by the USSR in 1987. And not Russia.

        And it’s not necessary to invent anything, it’s an Amer’s argument about Russian claims on missile defense.
    5. Federal
      Federal 29 July 2014 10: 50
      -1
      I agree with you, they are so screaming, no one needs a powerful and strong state. They will not stop at their filthy sanctions anyway. So let them choke on their sanctions unfinished bastards together with their African American "friend".
    6. net abort
      net abort 29 July 2014 10: 51
      +12
      only arm


      '' '
    7. Giant thought
      Giant thought 29 July 2014 11: 02
      +3
      The mattress workers themselves do not comply with this agreement, Russia needs to withdraw from this agreement, it is absolutely disadvantageous for us and at the moment infringes on our defense
    8. Cherdak
      Cherdak 29 July 2014 11: 07
      +4
      Quote: industries_88
      And then you need to break

      No, just to inform about the withdrawal in connection with the strengthening of NATO at the Russian borders.
      And in brackets to note: "It's nothing personal, just Smoked is already fucked up."
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 29 July 2014 11: 24
      +2
      I hope Lavrov popularly explained pendo.ske on which organ and at what speed we turned agreements with the United States and the opinions of their experts.
    11. armageddon
      armageddon 29 July 2014 12: 20
      +1
      Hmm ... Hike the states live according to the principle from Krylov's fable ... "You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat ..." Just forgot that Russia is not a lamb !!! Itself who likes to grab !!!
    12. 225chay
      225chay 29 July 2014 12: 44
      0
      Spit and sneeze at the Americans and their highs

      Quote: industries_88
      And then you need to break



      Build and create ... Build and build and as many different types of weapons as possible, at the same time and jobs will appear ...
      Why are we still looking back at some lousy pin dos?
      Stalin did his job without paying attention to the howl of underpants.
    13. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 July 2014 12: 59
      +5
      Quote: industries_88
      And then you need to break)

      Gentlemen-Russia does not violate anything, these missiles are part of the Russian air defense system. They are not directed against NATO, this is to protect against North Korea and Iran.
    14. The comment was deleted.
    15. The comment was deleted.
    16. Juborg
      Juborg 29 July 2014 14: 41
      +2
      I agree to all 100 !!! Due to the fact that Russia does not intervene in the conflict in the former Ukraine, the sanctions have not decreased, but are only building up at a loss to the West itself. How they shouted that Russia was to blame for everything, for all sins around the world, Syria, Iraq, even Yugoslavia, which was bombed by peaceful and democratic Americans. They are tightening the ring of NATO, although they promised not to, they continue to build a missile defense, again against us, not mythical terrorists, with Korea and Iran combined. And the medium-range missiles themselves for the United States do not have any strategic significance, only for the allies, Europe and Japan in the first place. It is high time to break and send all these agreements to toilet needs, the West has already violated all conceivable promises and agreements. And the medium range, this is the main weapon of NATO’s remote control, and the Yankees are well aware of this, and from there hysteria.
    17. avdkrd
      avdkrd 29 July 2014 14: 44
      +1
      No need to break anything. It is necessary to withdraw from all treaties inherited from the hunchback and transitional periods.
    18. randomizer
      randomizer 29 July 2014 14: 57
      0
      It has long been necessary to drop these treaties. The world is changing very quickly, and these treaties reflect the realities of the world order for 30 years in the past. The United States imposed its missile defense on all sides, and short- and medium-range missiles are just death for him.
    19. xenod55
      xenod55 29 July 2014 15: 41
      0
      Mattress covers suffer from multiple sclerosis (remembered after 6 years !!!!) and a certain type of blindness, when something is seen everywhere. When our missiles were cut according to this agreement, they "zanachil" their own, as it was necessary to cut 1: 1, but they had more and do not remember it. The troops are at the borders, sometimes they see, sometimes they don't see. Such a state could only survive on an island. Now they crawl like cockroaches to other territories. But over time, the cockroaches run away. Their hour will come. The hour of reckoning for everything they do and have already done
    20. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa 29 July 2014 16: 19
      0
      And again, no evidence, but in principle it is no longer a secret since the modernized Iskander has really been in service for quite a long time and exceeds the range in the contract, and it is not the only one.
      The United States is afraid that the Russian Federation may destroy their missile defense bases in Pribludostan and Geyrope at the same time without formally declaring war on the United States itself. And just the presence of such missiles will make you think the leaders of those countries in whose territories have already been built or are just planning to build a base for attacking the Russian Federation, well, apart from dill, of course it's a complete clinic.
    21. sergi801
      sergi801 29 July 2014 22: 37
      0
      Friend, I absolutely agree with you, unfortunately they don’t hear us. There are so few of us ???
  2. Rostovchanin
    Rostovchanin 29 July 2014 10: 27
    +10
    I always believed that the INF Treaty was only for ballistic missiles.
  3. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 29 July 2014 10: 27
    +27
    yes they would go on ... with their opinion !!! Different missiles are needed, different missiles are important !!!!
    1. Tima
      Tima 29 July 2014 11: 12
      +1
      The time has now come to drive the United States into an arms race. You look and paper wrappers will not be.
      1. MBA78
        MBA78 29 July 2014 11: 24
        +3
        haha piss in the fifth corner now striped satellites ...
        1. kodxnumx
          kodxnumx 29 July 2014 18: 21
          0
          Yes, and even if Russia violated something there in their opinion, then seeing how the USA just stupidly violates everything that is possible, what can they even tell us, let them look at their actions in the world, there’s so much dermis in countries I think the Russian Federation with a calm soul at the official level can be sent to HY, because they have sent the whole world the last 20 years there!
  4. Duke
    Duke 29 July 2014 10: 27
    +8
    Russia needs to think about its security. We are doing everything right.
  5. strannik595
    strannik595 29 July 2014 10: 28
    +33
    someone promised not to expand NATO’s eastward borders .......... start with yourself, learn to keep your word
    1. MBA78
      MBA78 29 July 2014 11: 27
      +2
      and there these rockets must be destroyed ...
      1. Warlock_r
        Warlock_r 29 July 2014 12: 04
        +5
        ... about America
  6. Kahlan amnell
    Kahlan amnell 29 July 2014 10: 30
    0
    Was there a violation? And if it was then whom?
    1. andj61
      andj61 29 July 2014 12: 45
      +1
      It’s not clear what these missiles are based on. The treaty covers ground-based medium-range cruise missiles. But you can always take a break, that in the conditions of the test site, a sea-launched cruise missile or, at worst, an air-based missile was tested; or that this is not a new missile, but the development and verification of the effectiveness of air defense on missiles of old versions withdrawn from service and modified specifically for these tests.
  7. Bombardier
    Bombardier 29 July 2014 10: 30
    0
    Pid_ry run up! if we make such missiles - well done, if not - we need to do this urgently!
  8. roman72-452
    roman72-452 29 July 2014 10: 31
    +4
    As he already got Fushington's howl, they believe that the truth is only what they say, and they are superior to proving something.
  9. Finches
    Finches 29 July 2014 10: 31
    +13
    According to Russia, the United States generally violated all conceivable and inconceivable norms, not only international law, but also human!
    1. Scoun
      Scoun 29 July 2014 10: 55
      +1
      Quote: Finches
      According to Russia,

      and a lot of honor for mattresses .. say yes write from Russia.
      It is enough for them that I believe that the United States should be destroyed by US citizens.
      In my humble opinion - the parasite of the USA should disappear on the body of our planet ...
      A friend writes from Ukraine ....
      Hey. I’m monitoring the Internet every day, here I have a pelt)) I don’t really trust the TV set ...
      the family is in order, my mother-in-law’s daughter, I’ll send my wife on vacation and I’ll leave to protect Nenko myself ...
      I hope soon the active phase will end already ...
      but about the minorities with the majority in the Crimea was already visible.
      hold on there with

      No words (((... That's what I object to him? What can I tell him if he believes that it’s my mosk washed. (((
      1. Finches
        Finches 29 July 2014 11: 04
        +2
        Don’t answer anything!
        Sooner or later, everything will fall into place, including the brains of your friend ..., the only thing I fear is that it will be too late and nothing can be done! In the meantime, the chances remain that not only individual people will be friends, but also our peoples!
        1. Scoun
          Scoun 29 July 2014 12: 21
          0
          Quote: Finches
          Don’t answer anything!

          well, I do just that ((((although a lot of what I would like to ask him about .. he is an air defense officer, a major from Kharkov and a very advanced person in himself .. but at the expense of the events in Ukraine (the same Berkut) he has a diametrically the opposite opinion and "Berkut" he spread rot for the fact that they "allegedly" beat simple recumbent students ...
          I really hope that sooner or later he will change his attitude to the events.
  10. Kuvabatake
    Kuvabatake 29 July 2014 10: 31
    +3
    I thought that the opinion of the mattresses did not bother us at all ... Let them look after their ass.
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 29 July 2014 10: 33
      0
      Quote: Kuvabatake
      I thought that the opinion of the mattresses did not bother us at all ..

      And here, you are mistaken. Exciting and how, judging by recent events ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
  11. ALEXX.
    ALEXX. 29 July 2014 10: 32
    +4
    I also think that it is necessary to violate, otherwise we just do nothing.
  12. Elena
    Elena 29 July 2014 10: 32
    +6
    It’s necessary a lot, there’s a lot of things that America has violated
  13. pinecone
    pinecone 29 July 2014 10: 32
    +3
    The "partners" got scammed.
  14. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 29 July 2014 10: 33
    +5
    Yes, then the whole question is that we launched a missile with a large (over 5,5 tkm) radius of action at a distance of up to 5,5 tkm ... If a rocket is capable of flying 11 tkm, why can't it fly 3 t.km ??? laughing
  15. korablik
    korablik 29 July 2014 10: 33
    +2
    It seems this is the agony of a negro. I remembered what happened in 2008. But it "seems" to him. The principle, at least something to shout before death. Could immediately, at choice - Sieg heil, glory to the ruin, heroes of fat.
  16. Gomunkul
    Gomunkul 29 July 2014 10: 34
    +3
    Washington said that Moscow violated the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF) by testing a ground-based cruise missile (CRNB).
    All claims to Gorbachev MS, he promised you, ask him from him. NATO also promised not to expand to the East. hi
  17. engineer74
    engineer74 29 July 2014 10: 34
    +3
    "It was not a ground-based KRBD, but a one-time attack drone and does not fall under the contract! Put your claims as intended!"
    I would say that ...
  18. Sobol
    Sobol 29 July 2014 10: 34
    +2
    It's time to get out of this "farce of medium and shorter range"
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 29 July 2014 11: 25
      +2
      And at the same time to withdraw from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Let us give Iran our ancient rubbish with a generous hand - and immediately the ambition of Israel will decrease. It would also be nice to revive the BZHRK.
  19. Lyton
    Lyton 29 July 2014 10: 34
    +3
    Yes, they go through the woods with their agreement, it is necessary to officially get out of it.
  20. leglun
    leglun 29 July 2014 10: 35
    +3
    Yes, they went to the farm of butterflies to catch, everything must be violated and spit on their warnings and exclamations. We must act by proverb, and the godfather listens and eats !!!
  21. kimyth1
    kimyth1 29 July 2014 10: 35
    +4
    In the context of the promotion of a new Cold War, this is a deterrent to Europe and America! Promotion to our borders, including the association of ruins with NATO! Obama is already threatening to take action! It's time to not moo yourself!
  22. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 29 July 2014 10: 36
    +6
    The United States withdrew from the ABM Treaty, Russia needs to withdraw from the INF Treaty! Many southern and eastern friends have full INF!
  23. AndreyRS
    AndreyRS 29 July 2014 10: 36
    +9
    Against the background of complete violations on their part in missile defense, the expansion of NATO, the merging of missile defense-precision weapons-offensive into a single unit, we REQUIRED missiles of reduced range. And lettington broadcast his opinion at least where. On their part, violations are orders of magnitude greater. And they are not friends to us, even on paper. So let your opinion be shoved into a well-known place.
    THX.
  24. vlade99
    vlade99 29 July 2014 10: 37
    +7
    Can you return the missiles to Cuba? Get quiet.
    1. SHURAVI
      SHURAVI 29 July 2014 10: 49
      +1
      I just wanted to write it myself. CORRECTLY! To deploy not only cruise missiles in Cuba, but also a missile defense system with radars and anti-missiles! Then the mattresses jump !!!
  25. Mhpv
    Mhpv 29 July 2014 10: 37
    +1
    Obama would rather pay more attention to his citizens:
    07: 15, 29 July 2014
    The student put on sale Obama's letter to pay for his studies


    Photo: www.inside.com
    American student Jesse Granger put up for sale a letter received from US President Barack Obama to pay for his studies at the university. This writes the New York Post.

    Back in 2011, Granger wrote a letter to Obama in which he spoke about his life. According to the young man, in 13 years, he became an orphan after the death of his adoptive mother. Within four years, Granger changed several adoptive families and, tired of living among alcoholics, drug addicts, homeless people and constant violence, decided to start his own life so as not to become the same as those around him.

    “On the day when I turned 17, I left the house with a bag, where there were several books, clothes and the Bible of my mother, and went on a journey that changed my life forever,” wrote Granger to Obama.

    The young man was lucky to get into a good family in South Carolina, so he graduated from college. However, when Granger was accepted to the university, the question arose about paying for his studies, which 10 thousand dollars lacked.

    In his letter, the student asked the president to help realize his dream. The President in response thanked Granger for the appeal. “The best advice I can give you is to finish your education. I am proud of you! ”Obama wrote.

    Now, three years later, to cover all training costs, Granger decided to sell the letter for 9,5 thousand dollars.

    http://lenta.ru/news/2014/07/29/letter/
  26. Federicco
    Federicco 29 July 2014 10: 38
    +2
    According to the United States, the Russian Federation violated the Treaty on the Elimination of Medium and Short Range Missiles


    Yes, they went to {EQ ...
  27. tyrus
    tyrus 29 July 2014 10: 38
    +3
    Yes, they would not have gone with their statements as "dogs"! Why have they been silent for six years? Or has the rocket just arrived? smile USA must be destroyed! So Wang foresaw!
  28. argon
    argon 29 July 2014 10: 42
    +2
    This agreement was signed by Hunchback so that he could later hang out in a geyrop with a Nobel laureate. What so flattered pride. Well, get out of the harvester to the very top, handle with the offspring of royal houses. In conditions when NATO is surrounding Russia quite densely, RSDs of up to 5,5 thousand km will be very appropriate.
  29. Leviton
    Leviton 29 July 2014 10: 43
    +2
    Forgive me, perhaps, my ignorance, but the deployment of missile defense around the territory of Russia, this is not a violation? because installation data (or I'm wrong) can be used to launch ground-to-ground missiles. Moreover, the sense in this treaty is if it includes only 2 parties from the USA and Russia (by the way, then the USSR) and the rest can carry out, launch, as much as you like, how can we not care about security? besides, the United States did not develop such systems when (why do they need them, they are fighting from far away) giving these systems to the NATO countries (their vassals) the only thing that seems true is that Russia had to carry out the denunciation of the treaty long ago, as We do not meet the safety requirements of the Russian Federation
    1. kostyan77708
      kostyan77708 29 July 2014 11: 59
      0
      Quote: LevITon
      Forgive me, perhaps, my ignorance, but the deployment of missile defense around the territory of Russia, this is not a violation? because installation data (or I'm wrong) can be used to launch ground-to-ground missiles. Moreover, the sense in this treaty is if it includes only 2 parties from the USA and Russia (by the way, then the USSR) and the rest can carry out, launch, as much as you like, how can we not care about security? besides, the United States did not develop such systems when (why do they need them, they are fighting from far away) giving these systems to the NATO countries (their vassals) the only thing that seems true is that Russia had to carry out the denunciation of the treaty long ago, as We do not meet the safety requirements of the Russian Federation

      I apologize, why is this a mattress with a capital letter, and Russia with a small one?
  30. slava11
    slava11 29 July 2014 10: 43
    -3
    Why are you all so nervous. You have the most ballistic missiles in the world. Americans are afraid of them. Europeans are afraid of the Iskander. Why are you even developing anything else? And so everyone is afraid. Or not?
    1. Performance
      Performance 29 July 2014 10: 57
      +6
      Yeah, but a plumbing pipe with stabilizers from a galvanized bucket can do a lot if it goes where it is intended! You know ... For the sake of this - "where intended" and we are developing!
      1. slava11
        slava11 29 July 2014 15: 04
        -5
        So I agree that it is necessary to develop - but it’s sickening to read when a ship that doesn’t remember when it left the slipway is written that it is the MOST and not only about the ship. Objectivity ZERO as for Russian weapons.

        And again with us ..

        During the battle in Khan Younis, the "Mail Ruach" active protection system was activated on the Merkava 4 tank.

        Palestinian terrorists fired an anti-tank missile at the 401st Brigade's Merkava east of Khan Younis. The Mail Ruach shot down a missile.

        Merkava's team immediately suppressed the source of the fire.
    2. Raven1972
      Raven1972 29 July 2014 12: 22
      +4
      Quote: slava11
      Why are you all so nervous

      And we just don’t get nervous, it’s you who come to GMO hi
      Quote: slava11
      You have ballistic missiles the most ballistic missiles in the world

      There is, therefore, we are not nervous bully
      Quote: slava11
      Why are you even developing anything else?

      And so for each of your greetings
      An answer has flown to you
      soldier
      Quote: slava11
      And so everyone is afraid

      So let them continue to fear, let them fear us rather than we them hi
      PS More rockets - good and different soldier
    3. andj61
      andj61 29 July 2014 12: 55
      +4
      Quote: slava11
      Why are you all so nervous. You have the most ballistic missiles in the world. Americans are afraid of them. Europeans are afraid of the Iskander. Why are you even developing anything else? And so everyone is afraid. Or not?

      It's simple: Iskander cannot even reach Berlin from the Kaliningrad region. Strategic missiles are designed to strike the United States. But before a possible strike, the United States may concentrate in Europe a grouping that we have nothing to reach. Waste "strategists"? But then the actual territory of the United States will not get. And the nuclear forces of Britain and France, as well as the bases of other NATO members, cannot be ignored - this is more expensive for ourselves. Now only aviation (Tu-22M2) can "get" these targets, there is little hope for the fleet.
  31. pascal309
    pascal309 29 July 2014 10: 44
    +2
    Quote: AndreyRS
    Against the background of complete violations on their part in missile defense, the expansion of NATO, the merging of missile defense-precision weapons-offensive into a single unit, we REQUIRED missiles of reduced range. And lettington broadcast his opinion at least where. On their part, violations are orders of magnitude greater. And they are not friends to us, even on paper. So let your opinion be shoved into a well-known place.
    THX.

    I agree with you. Amerikosy really finished id-you. NATO is expanding, missile defense is being built, and preparing for war with Russia. And against this background, they are shouting that Russians are testing short- and medium-range missiles. Indeed, Zadornov said, Well, they are very stupid !!!
    1. 225chay
      225chay 29 July 2014 17: 04
      +1
      Quote: pascal309
      against this background, they shout that the Russians are testing short- and medium-range missiles. Indeed, Zadornov said, Well, they are very stupid !!!


      They are not so stupid as vile and deceitful!
  32. PalSanych
    PalSanych 29 July 2014 10: 45
    +3
    why are these baboons silent since 2008
  33. andranick
    andranick 29 July 2014 10: 46
    +2
    At one time, the United States crushed the USSR precisely with an arms race. The time has come to return the "return line" and provoke the US to increase the budget for the arms race. And therefore - nafig contracts, and do not care for screams, we are trying to expose us as aggressors without any violations. So maybe start to match the image? It is easy to believe in the West; this idea has been imposed on their inhabitants for several decades.
    1. slava11
      slava11 29 July 2014 10: 51
      .
      US Military Budget - 526,800,000,000
      European Union - 300
      Russia's military budget - 71,200,780,000
      Will you overtake them?
      1. andranick
        andranick 29 July 2014 10: 53
        +6
        No, and do not. ;) Small means with the application of the mind can provoke a waste of disproportionately large funds. In particular, you can use the hysterical mood about Russian aggression and the capitalist interests of Western arms manufacturers.
      2. kostyan77708
        kostyan77708 29 July 2014 12: 02
        +5
        Quote: slava11
        US Military Budget - 526,800,000,000
        European Union - 300
        Russia's military budget - 71,200,780,000
        Will you overtake them?


        well, their budgets can be safely divided by 3-5 if not more, they’re sawing their Serdyukovs no worse than ours
        1. Manager
          Manager 29 July 2014 12: 12
          +2
          Quote: kostyan77708
          well, their budgets can be safely divided by 3-5 if not more, they’re sawing their Serdyukovs no worse than ours


          Yes Serdyukov is a child in comparison with them. Plus add the cost of maintaining all AUGs there. It is after these deductions that the military budget of Russia will turn out.
        2. andj61
          andj61 29 July 2014 13: 00
          +3
          We do not need to catch up with the money, it is enough to slightly (2 times, or better 5 times) increase the range of the Iskander and slightly revise the plans for their production and deployment - and that will be enough.
        3. slava11
          slava11 29 July 2014 15: 00
          -4
          Judging by the cost of 1 km of road construction, Americans still have to study and learn from you. Do not be shy.
      3. dauria
        dauria 29 July 2014 12: 15
        +1
        The data is pretty old, late 70s. A month after "h" - the losses of the USA - 120 million people, the USSR - 140 million people. (due to the population density of the European part of the USSR). The turn in 2 weeks is the northwest coast of France. At least half of what we promised we are able to do now ... Can you pull this alignment? That's when I got a little nervous. By the way, everything was told thoroughly, without hysterics, shapkozakidatelsva. With numbers, deadlines and milestones. Not secret, no, so chipboard, so that they figured out what's what ... Well, will you pull 100 million coffins?
        1. andj61
          andj61 29 July 2014 13: 08
          +5
          Quote: dauria
          The data is pretty old, late 70s. A month after "h" - the losses of the USA - 120 million people, the USSR - 140 million people. (due to the population density of the European part of the USSR).

          A bit wrong: the US population density is much higher, it is more compact - the Atlantic and Pacific coast plus the Great Lakes region. When exchanging blows with the USSR (late 70s - early 80s), US losses were estimated at 150-180 million, the USSR - 100-120 million.
          Keep in mind that a little later, in the 80s, in response to the Reagan SDI, the concept of deep-sea nuclear mining of the world's oceans was proposed with the aim of creating a tsunami and causing damage to the coast of the enemy. In this case, a wave appears at the site of the explosion, approximately equal to the depth of the underwater nuclear charge.
          But a lot of infrastructure and the United States and Europe are located on the coast.
      4. MolGro
        MolGro 29 July 2014 12: 34
        +3
        How much money the monkey doesn’t give it anyway it will wipe the ass!
        History has proven that quantity is not equal to quality.
      5. uhu189
        uhu189 29 July 2014 13: 24
        0
        In all, of course not, but in something specific - a completely achievable goal. It would be a desire. Do you not know this?
      6. domiemon
        domiemon 29 July 2014 13: 36
        0
        Here the question consists of what this military budget is. There are a lot of amers for social services (salaries, all kinds of subsidies for housing and education) goes to the maintenance of the bases. R&D itself is much less, and even there a lot of money is spent on dead-end projects such as an "aircraft laser cannon" or an absolutely failed F-35 aircraft. The cut goes there too, be healthy. I know this personally from the amer, who dreamed of stealing from the Navy and opening a small logistics outsourcing business for the base on his contacts. Naturally overpriced. There the cut goes. Europeans, I think, have a similar picture
      7. The comment was deleted.
      8. AQUARIUS 65
        AQUARIUS 65 29 July 2014 14: 07
        +2
        It seems that we are already overtaking since they started yelling.
  34. malahit4444
    malahit4444 29 July 2014 10: 47
    +2
    Go poke with the uki of Iskander in their mouth
  35. Rubmolot
    Rubmolot 29 July 2014 10: 48
    +3
    Well, they made fun again .. laughing
    Fushington and the contract with him - sounds like a contract with a worker of a common orgasm about celibacy.

    Ceterum censeo USA esse delendam
  36. Veteran of the Red Army
    Veteran of the Red Army 29 July 2014 10: 48
    +2
    not to produce, not to test and deploy ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles of medium (1000-5500 km) and shorter (500-1000 km) range. They also had to destroy all launchers and ground-based missiles within three years.

    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/412/xnoo473.jpg
  37. dimasialyt
    dimasialyt 29 July 2014 10: 48
    +4
    But in my opinion, we need to apologize a little. Like, forgiveness, I escaped one, the most harmful ... We have a whole pack of them, unless you see everyone! .. sad
  38. ankh-andrej
    ankh-andrej 29 July 2014 10: 50
    +6
    I hope that these missiles will soon guard the territory of Cuba and Venezuela.
    1. slava11
      slava11 29 July 2014 10: 55
      -4
      Damn you again agree to feed these parasites. Take the money now, what fund?
      1. Dazdranagon
        Dazdranagon 29 July 2014 11: 03
        +2
        Quote: slava11
        Take the money now, what fund?
        - But who then takes the money from them? Cuba has forgiven part of the debt - mainly interest, and the rest we are letting into the development of Cuba itself! hi
        1. slava11
          slava11 29 July 2014 15: 01
          -2
          And what is developing there unless of course, as usual, a secret?
          1. Dazdranagon
            Dazdranagon 30 July 2014 09: 06
            0
            Quote: slava11
            And what is developing there unless of course, as usual, a secret?
            - not a secret, but so far there is little information! I just know that Cubans let us on the shelf on favorable terms! Anyway, where to spend 3,2 billion dollars. there is where! hi
  39. Bolivar
    Bolivar 29 July 2014 10: 51
    +3
    Since Americans are nervous, then we do everything right. It’s necessary to place all beginnings and ideas in the Amer’s press, and then to make dislocations: hysteria is a vital matter, positive feedback is not worth starting.
  40. 1536
    1536 29 July 2014 10: 52
    +2
    What is there to discuss. This American "letter" is only suitable for discussion between clerks in the Foreign Ministry's smoking room.
  41. DPZ
    DPZ 29 July 2014 10: 52
    +3
    in the new reality, it's time to steal the old arrangements!
  42. Performance
    Performance 29 July 2014 10: 53
    +1
    "These statements do not seem convincing to us ..."
  43. Victor-M
    Victor-M 29 July 2014 10: 54
    +2
    “The United States found that the Russian Federation violated obligations under the INF Treaty not to test, manufacture, or deploy KLNB (ground-based cruise missiles) with a range of 500 kilometers to 5,5 thousand kilometers,”


    American sanctions have taken effect, but you do not worry dear Yankees, these are short- and medium-range missiles, and they are not directed against you. Glory to Russia!!! laughing
  44. Party3an
    Party3an 29 July 2014 10: 55
    +2
    Let pend * s shove this treaty into your head. belay
  45. vlad-ns
    vlad-ns 29 July 2014 10: 55
    +1
    It is necessary to make addressable BR. Specifically, on such creatures as: Poroshenko and Co., Obama and Co.
  46. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 29 July 2014 10: 56
    +2
    Can someone explain to me how this statement correlates with the fact that the United States has a huge number of such carriers (the same tamahawks) that they produce and are constantly upgrading?

    I think that the Americans are trying again to play a win-win fool. Those. If we send them, they will yell at once about the carnivorous Russians, from whom the threat to Europe comes (missiles are medium, they will not reach the USA). And if we agree, then, as always, they simply put their battle axes in the warehouse until they want to deliver a global preventive strike on us. Those. about three or four years later, when (and if they succeed) the Ukrainian and Moldavian armies will be rearmament and they will be told ata Russia ..
    1. Rostovchanin
      Rostovchanin 29 July 2014 12: 11
      0
      Can someone explain to me how this statement correlates with the fact that the United States has a huge number of such carriers (the same tamahawks) that they produce and are constantly upgrading?

      The Tamagawks have carriers or ships or planes, while the INF Treaty is talking about ground carriers (mobile soil complexes)
      1. Al_lexx
        Al_lexx 30 July 2014 12: 18
        0
        Quote: Rostovchanin
        Can someone explain to me how this statement correlates with the fact that the United States has a huge number of such carriers (the same tamahawks) that they produce and are constantly upgrading?

        The Tamagawks have carriers or ships or planes, while the INF Treaty is talking about ground carriers (mobile soil complexes)

        Thank. Now it is clear.
    2. shelin2010
      shelin2010 29 July 2014 12: 17
      +1
      August 6 and 9 is the anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We must fully utilize this in all media. And China will bill for the radioactive contamination of its territory as a result of US actions. And not only the PRC, but other neighboring countries (DPRK, Vietnam, etc.)
  47. fktrcfylhn61
    fktrcfylhn61 29 July 2014 10: 58
    +1
    Earlier, the New York Times stated that the test of a new cruise missile conducted by Russia in 2008 !!!
    After the fight, they don’t wave their fists ... or only the Americans!
  48. alselu
    alselu 29 July 2014 10: 59
    +1
    no longer know what to complain about! for a long time it comes to them!))) Already from 2008 digested information! Correctly Zadornov says that they are DULL!
  49. vjatsergey
    vjatsergey 29 July 2014 11: 00
    +6
    But is it not enough for Russia to justify itself to all, is it not time to start blaming them all for all their sins. For Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and others to sue them in the Hague court, to accuse the Nobel Peace Prize winner of fomenting war, supporting terrorism, fascism, etc. It is time to advance, and not to smear snot on the cheeks and make excuses to everyone.
    1. arch_kate3
      arch_kate3 29 July 2014 11: 43
      +5
      It's time, it's time! We have our own hounds! Set our psak on theirs!
  50. calocha
    calocha 29 July 2014 11: 01
    +9
    It’s time to stop paying attention to Europe and the USA. They have already violated everything that is possible .. If we are independent, we are obliged to bend our line without looking at anyone.
    1. slava11
      slava11 29 July 2014 11: 10
      -8
      This is patsansky. Today - now leave their UN.
      1. andj61
        andj61 29 July 2014 13: 12
        +5
        Quote: slava11
        This is patsansky. Today - now leave their UN.


        What is this for? Russia is a member of the Security Council. The UN will not be able to make any REAL decision without Russia.
        1. slava11
          slava11 29 July 2014 15: 01
          -4
          What do you mean why???

          Russian Foreign Ministry criticized the "hypocritical" UN report on Ukraine