“America is the main repeat offender of world politics”
Downed "Boeing" - just one example of the provocations it has arranged
The Boeing crash: a tragic accident or a deliberate provocation? Especially for KM.RU, a well-known expert, doctor historical Vardan Baghdasaryan
When studying US military operations, a pattern is found
The case of a downed Malaysian plane reveals two approaches in understanding the historical process. The first is to look at history as a kaleidoscope of chance. In this version, the Malaysian plane was shot down due to the sloppiness and low professionalism of the Ukrainian armed forces.
The second approach could be conditionally defined as a project approach. According to him, the historical process is projected. This approach assumes that there are goals and objectives of the project, there is a subject of design, the necessary resources are available to implement the plan of the designer.
So what happened in the sky over Donetsk - a tragic accident or a planned action by the projector? The incident could be defined as an accident, if the incident was exhausted by a single erroneous action. When a whole set of actions or circumstances are woven into a coherent sequence, then there is no reason to talk about randomness.
In one time interval, a great deal came together: the movement of the Buk air defense missile system of Ukraine to close proximity to the positions of the militias; Su-25 military aircraft at a distance from 3 to 5 kilometers from a Malaysian airliner; American satellite flying over the territory of Ukraine; change the flight path of a Malaysian aircraft; encirclement of the Ukrainian group and its withdrawal from the ring during the partial suspension of hostilities by militias; organizing an information campaign on the a priori accusation of Russia and the militia.
When studying the methods of preparing American power operations in the outside world, a certain handwriting, a pattern, is found. Downed Malaysian aircraft clearly correlated with this pattern. Every time, some kind of provocation was organized, preparing American and world public opinion for the forceful act of “retaliation” and giving “moral” grounds for launching a military strike.
According to some historians, the Americans themselves were substituted by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor.
Often the provocative pretext was achieved by conducting “false flag operations”. Not only the United States, of course, carried out such operations (it is enough, for example, to recall the Gleuitsky incident, from which, as we know, the Second World War began), but it was for the United States that such operations constituted a special corporate identity. This predisposition is due to the notorious democratic positioning of the American state.
For the adoption of significant political decisions, such as, for example, entry into the war, the moral approval of the majority of Americans was required. To get the same approval, as well as in the American elections, any means could be used.
15 February 1898, an American armored ship "Men" was blown up in a Havana bay. Two thirds of the crew died, while all the senior officers who were in the cabins, far from the explosion, were still alive. The Americans said that the explosion occurred as a result of an attack by a Spanish torpedo, or a floating mine. This incident was used as a pretext for the start of the Spanish-American war, as a result of which the territories of Cuba, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, which belonged earlier to Spain, were ceded to the United States. Investigations conducted in subsequent years proved that the explosion occurred inside the ship, and therefore could not be a Spanish sabotage.
7 May 1915, the German submarine sunk a British passenger liner "Lusitania", among the dead passengers of which were 128 Americans, including famous people in the US. The question that flooding a ship with American passengers would have been sufficient reason for the United States to enter the war against Germany was discussed at the level of the Anglo-American establishment.
"Lusitania" led to disaster. The path through the active zone of German submarines, the change of route along the course of travel exactly to one of the German submarines, the absence of the usual military escort — all this indicates that the Americans themselves needed the victim. After the collapse of Lusitania, anti-German sentiment in the United States became predominant. Woodrow Wilson began preparations for the entry of the United States into the war on the side of the Entente.
7 December 1941, as a result of the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor, was carried out the defeat of the US Navy. After this, the United States enters World War II. President F. Roosevelt and previously sought entry into the war, but did not receive the approval of Congress. According to a number of modern historians, the Americans themselves were substituted by the Japanese. Having the necessary information about a possible strike, they not only did not alert the fleet, but also weakened the Hawaiian grouping, withdrawing all aircraft carriers and the most modern battleships.
Criminal offenders are often identified by characteristic methods.
4 August 1964 was announced by Americans about an attack by the North Vietnamese boats of the American destroyers Maddox and Turner Joy in the Gulf of Tonky. US President Lyndon Johnson orders an air strike on the territory of North Vietnam. Defended by the fact of an enemy attack, the Congress adopts the Thonky Resolution, which gives the president the right to use armed forces to protect American allies in Southeast Asia.
The United States is entering the war in Vietnam. However, from the numerous testimonies, both Vietnamese and American, it appears that in reality there were no attacks on the 4 August boats. From the documents declassified in 2005 by the National Security Agency, it follows that great doubts about the reality of the Thonian incident were expressed immediately, even at the investigation stage.
11 September 2001 was the site of the World Trade Center in New York for a terrorist attack. According to the official version, the ultra-radical organization of Wahhabi Islam, al-Qaeda, was responsible for the attack. Afflicted by the incident, American society demands retribution. The United States declares war on international terrorism: in 2001, US troops invade Afghanistan, in 2003, in Iraq.
The legitimacy of the invasions stemmed from the fact of the terrorist act. However, there is a widespread view of the September 11 attack as a provocation organized by US intelligence agencies. Indicates ignoring the official investigation of numerous evidence.
5 February 2003 US Secretary of State Colin Power spoke at a special meeting of the UN Security Council with evidence that Iraq has weapons mass destruction. The UN Security Council did not believe the arguments presented and did not authorize the use of force. However, the US Congress, under the impression of the “evidence” received, sanctioned the use of American forces against the regime of Saddam Hussein. The Iraq war begins. It takes only a year - and Powell admits that the data he made public were inaccurate and, in some cases, falsified.
According to the calculations of American journalists (American Civil Liability Center and the Foundation for Independent Journalism) for the period from September 2001 to September 2003. The leadership of the United States of America made 935 knowingly false statements on the Iraq problem. The biggest liar was the American President J. Bush - 260 of such statements.
The historical list could be broader. Not all of the organized provocations were likely to be exposed.
Criminal offenders are often identified by characteristic methods of crime. It is obvious that the phenomenon of recidivism exists in world politics. Downed Malaysian aircraft fits all signs of such a relapse.
- Vardan Baghdasaryan
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.