In the United States recognized the partial loss of weapons supplied to Afghanistan

59
Since 2004, the United States delivered about 750 thousand units to Afghanistan weapons, but in whose hands it is now, the Pentagon cannot say. Reports about it lenta.ru with reference to the report of the special inspector of the United States on the reconstruction projects of Afghanistan, John Sopko.



In particular, the inspector writes:
“There is a threat that weapons supplied by the United States and the coalition (International Security Assistance Force) may be stolen, lost or misused. We are extremely concerned that the weapons purchased with the money of American taxpayers may be in the hands of insurgents and be used to kill American and Afghan military and civilians. ”


Sopko notes that the training and arming of Afghan security forces is almost central to the policy of Barack Obama, but the accounting of the weapons supplied is poorly conducted. For example, at least 465 thousand of small arms were shipped to Afghanistan, but it was not possible to establish the exact number of barrels due to the Pentagon’s providing “not very reliable” information. But it turned out that the Afghan army and police received the extra AK-47 assault rifles in the amount of 83 thousand.

The problem of low control over the supply of weapons did not arise in the US today. In 2010, legislators, by adopting a special regulatory act, obliged the Pentagon to create databases and with their help track military supplies to Afghanistan and Pakistan. So there were two bases - "SCIP" and "OVERLORD". But, as auditors found out, their efficiency turned out to be rather low due to the lack of communication and synchronization between them.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    59 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +17
      28 July 2014 17: 06
      There are three options:
      1. Laundered money, "unaccounted for" weapons - "virtual"
      2. Sent to a thread .... but - where no one needs to know .. did it reach Afghanistan somehow ?.
      3. Just sloppiness ... just like ours wink
      1. +2
        28 July 2014 17: 52
        Quote: vsoltan
        There are three options: 1. Money laundered, "unaccounted for" weapon - "virtual" 2. They sent it somewhere ... and - where no one needs to know ... but did it arrive in Afghanistan? .3. Just slovenliness ... just like ours

        There are many more options.
        Take, for example, the fact that the more wars erupt on the planet, the better they will live in the United States.
        There are so many countries nearby that are, directly or indirectly, the enemies of the United States, so why not set this piece of the planet on fire.
        1. +2
          28 July 2014 18: 35
          There are many more options.
          Take, for example, the fact that the more wars erupt on the planet, the better they will live in the United States.

          And another addiction - THE MORE THE Americans SUPPLY WEAPONS, THERE ARE MORE FOCUSES OF WARS! THERE ARE MORE DOLLARS GETTING TO THE TREASURE OF THE USA AND POCKETS OF BUSINESSMEN!
          Therefore, the Yankees have one slogan - GIVE MORE WAR ... NOT BIG AND SMALL!
          And where did the weapons go - let them check the militants in Syria ... Pakistan ... Afghanistan ... Libya That is, where they fought and where they delivered the weapons ... But since it is impossible to recognize the supply of weapons ... then it’s better to make a khanzensky - an innocent face and wringing your hands ... crying about the loss ...
      2. 0
        28 July 2014 19: 32
        The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.
    2. +30
      28 July 2014 17: 09
      It is necessary to lose half a million Kalashnikovs in Mexico.
      1. +8
        28 July 2014 17: 40
        and MANPADS, and bumblebees, in short, help with democracy
        1. +7
          28 July 2014 18: 17
          Provide "brotherly assistance" to the unipolar))

          In the meantime, right at your side:

          1. +8
            28 July 2014 18: 43
            Amazingly, every captive dill is indignant in the first place that they don’t pay wages! They kill children, but they don’t get paid. These are no longer people, this is some kind of garbage!
            1. 0
              29 July 2014 05: 13
              Quote: almost demobilized
              It’s not people anymore, it’s garbage some kind!

              Even the most corrupt garbage compared to them are still people.
          2. +3
            28 July 2014 18: 49
            Damn, we were captured so we don’t know we were deceived. They think they will give them gingerbread cookies. All are so cunning. But the militias did not show the victims, probably they are immediately killed. . And everyone wants to immediately a lady to her mother, wife.
      2. 0
        29 July 2014 05: 10
        Quote: figvam
        It is necessary to lose half a million Kalashnikovs in Mexico.

        What do you think? Already did it. They sold a considerable number of trunks to illegal immigrants, mainly AK-47, but there were many others, hoping to track the chain to the Mexican drug mafia. Take a chain and tear. Nobody would have known anything if the American border guard had not been soaked from one such trunk. They began to find out the history of the trunk, and then it surfaced.
        If there was someone else, not Obama, the president, it would be drawn to impeachment, and his Attorney General, also by the way Negro oh, sorry, the African American who oversaw the operation was supposed to sit down for it at all. But lowered on the brakes.
        am

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal

        Found only in English, in Russian, unfortunately, no
    3. Vreonosec
      0
      28 July 2014 17: 09
      PPC ... Such slobs do this =)
    4. +7
      28 July 2014 17: 10
      Ha ha, lost, captured. All these extra 83 thousand are already stupidly sold. Or maybe they haven’t even reached Afghanistan, as practice shows, the most professional megapillers of the budget are our Omerian friends.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 18: 41
        I think the United States has another series ... Tales from the Vienna Woods !!! For a long time, everything is capitalized !!!
    5. +2
      28 July 2014 17: 11
      Woke up. They would have thought where were those trunks that were delivered to the Mujahideen :)
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 19: 14
        How is it where ??? shoot at those who handed out.
    6. +2
      28 July 2014 17: 11
      may be stolen, lost or misused.

      oh well then fuck it. personal gesheft.
    7. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 12
      Guess from 3 times where it will pop up?
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 17: 55
        yes in any way dill
    8. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 12
      Well, what kind of control can there be over weapons in Afghanistan if an automaton is presented to a boy right after birth? Where to get that trunk? Those who bring ...
      Yes, and relatives must be provided ...
    9. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 15
      Ay beauties! So many trunks about ... to. Our generals in the first Chechen probably less about ... whether.
    10. +2
      28 July 2014 17: 21
      Prapora and the Americans have ???
    11. argon
      +2
      28 July 2014 17: 21
      About times, about mores! When withdrawn (read: skedaddle) from the Baltic States in 93rd year. We have the head of the RAV service shot himself, because of 3 PMs, which were "lost" by the warrant officers of the warehouses.
    12. 0
      28 July 2014 17: 21
      United States Special Inspector for Afghanistan Reconstruction Projects ??? you’re better at reconstructing your sheep there. interesting to them the Taliban expressed gratitude?
    13. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 22
      It's funny, Americans just like Ukrainians love to make weapons. Afghans are probably already dying with laughter, but we know how the Mujahideen love to laugh, right?
    14. 0
      28 July 2014 17: 22
      America supplies the terrorists with weapons. That is how it is necessary to talk about it.
      Smart what amerikosy
      There is a risk that weapons supplied by the United States and the coalition (International Security Assistance Force) could be stolen, lost or misused.
    15. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 24
      This weapon will supposedly come up in Ukraine, although maybe I'm wrong.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 17: 28
        Quote: Wend
        This weapon will supposedly come up in Ukraine, although maybe I'm wrong.

        In Ukraine, there’s nowhere to go about your rifle! The Americans themselves seized and drove!
      2. 0
        28 July 2014 17: 41
        Perhaps it has already surfaced in Syria and Iraq
    16. 0
      28 July 2014 17: 25
      By the way. Very interesting infa. Under this shop, you can deliver ukra trunks, supposedly lost in Afghanistan! A very competent move. We also need to come up with something similar to support the militias.
    17. 0
      28 July 2014 17: 26
      An extra 83 barrels? Fantastic, some sort of. How can this be? Almost a hundred thousand machines were superfluous, it somehow even sounds stupid! Not needles, tea ... Such a figure does not fit into my head! Eighty three thousand "Kalash" ... PPC !!! They are there on preparations, is that all ?! And then what? C-000, with ammunition for them, will disappear? Well, the circus ...
    18. +2
      28 July 2014 17: 26
      Quote: KrSk
      interesting to them the Taliban expressed gratitude?

      A little later, according to Amer’s corpses, we will determine the degree of gratitude.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 20: 37
        divis? What do you have There shelling near Haifa? My niece (with a fool) you have there for her husband.
    19. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 27
      All the Americans have thought out. "Lose" a hundred thousand trunks in any region, and here you are, one more "hot" point is guaranteed. And then on the knurled script.
    20. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 29
      Quickly identified a defect. Some ten years.
    21. 0
      28 July 2014 17: 30
      Author, what is laughing? Count small arms (!) Weapons in Afghanistan ?! Extra machines? This is Afghanistan ...
    22. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 31
      but in whose hands it is now, the Pentagon cannot say.

      They lie ...! We would have to lose Venezuela in Nicaragua, and it is better to lose in Mexico too .. (The USA in the Old World is fueling constant conflicts)) But neither on its borders ... Is that why?
      1. +3
        28 July 2014 17: 51
        We would love to "lose" a tank brigade on our border ...
        1. 0
          28 July 2014 18: 01
          Quote: RusDV
          We would love to "lose" a tank brigade on our border ...

          Gee-gee! .. Class!
        2. -1
          28 July 2014 18: 04
          Quote: RusDV
          We would love to "lose" a tank brigade on our border ...

          I think it would be more effective if in Syria and Palestine ... (there powerful levers would come in ..)
      2. 0
        29 July 2014 05: 16
        Quote: MIKHAN
        but in whose hands it is now, the Pentagon cannot say.

        They lie ...! We would have to lose Venezuela in Nicaragua, and it is better to lose in Mexico too .. (The USA in the Old World is fueling constant conflicts)) But neither on its borders ... Is that why?

        See my post above on this topic.
    23. Sofa fighter
      +1
      28 July 2014 17: 34
      I wish the United States recognized the complete loss of brain in their government!
    24. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 35
      Well, everything is like in people. Automatic machines, okay, but did their stingers not resolve? And then they will pop up somewhere, near a major airport.
    25. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 40
      Very universal message:
      “There is a risk that weapons supplied by the United States and the coalition (International Security Assistance Force) could be stolen, lost or misused. We are extremely concerned that weapons bought with U.S. taxpayers' money may be in the hands of rebels and used to kill American and __________ military and civilians. "

      And here you can write, on the occasion of ... Afghan, Iraqi .... Ukrainian
    26. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 40
      Why, they "lost" ... American generals exchanged weapons from the Taliban for heroin, which was flown by plane to Europe and around the world, while receiving a thousand percent profit. It is not for nothing that during the occupation of Afghanistan, the area of ​​poppy plantings has grown hundreds of times. As they say: - "It's nothing personal, it's business, baby"!
    27. +2
      28 July 2014 17: 48
      Grandmas do their job.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 18: 42
        Grandmas? Psaki with a friend shtol?! :)))) Why are they interested in missing weapons do not comment on ??? that would be interesting to neighing would be :)))))
    28. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 50
      I remember in the days of the USSR we also "lost" weapons in Africa and especially in the Middle East .. (Egypt Iraq Syria Palestine ..) there was no such chaos that is happening there now .... I think now it would not be bad to "lose something "in Syria and Palestine (well, in Cuba, of course) .. I think many conflicts would have subsided by themselves .. Or am I wrong ..?
      1. avt
        0
        28 July 2014 18: 27
        Quote: MIKHAN
        I remember in the days of the USSR we also "lost" weapons

        Lost. With the permission of the Central Committee, the KGB "lost" and the military, moreover, "lost" in Afghanistan from the "pacified" field commanders, "lost" not only the trophy - Kryuchkov broke through the permission to "lose" the new. Well, where did it come up .. .. Heg knows him, I don't like guys.
    29. 0
      28 July 2014 17: 55
      Clear business ... the weapon settled at the Ukrainian junta and, apparently, will settle even more.
    30. +1
      28 July 2014 17: 56
      What the Germans sent, Walter PPK police pistols, they didn’t even get to the police ... Everything was on sale in the market ... I read about it in the press ... Anyway, most of the junk sent by Amers settles on local markets, both in Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan ... On the Internet, US camouflage from Kyrgyzstan is offered in bulk ...
    31. princess
      0
      28 July 2014 18: 15
      Pumping up weapons of Afghanistan, so that the conflict does not fade away and drug paths leading and destroying the continent flourished. The task is to create maximum problems and crises for the enemy, thereby at least somehow weaken or force to postpone the solution to the most important problems.
    32. 0
      28 July 2014 18: 29
      Now in the pentogon they are feverishly thinking about something else to "lose" in Afghanistan, otherwise the loot from the machines has already ended!
    33. 0
      28 July 2014 18: 35
      Themselves and sold "to the left" !!!!
    34. 0
      28 July 2014 19: 01
      And where are the guarantees that the Afghans were not thoughtfully left behind?! There was never really power, field commanders divided the country into "their" provinces. 2 fingers .... Without external aggression, in Kyrgyzstan, the authorities were "knocked down" 2 times. The Afghans are not the Ukrop army, they know how to fight. The Americans are very good at it, another hot spot at our border to do
    35. +1
      28 July 2014 19: 02
      In short, the conclusion is this..Russia urgently needs to "lose" a couple of mechanized brigades in Novorossiya ... (well, of course the dryers of the "night hunters") Why are we worse than the USA ..?
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 20: 24
        Quote: MIKHAN
        In short, the conclusion is this..Russia urgently needs to "lose" a couple of mechanized brigades in Novorossiya ... (well, of course the dryers of the "night hunters") Why are we worse than the USA ..?

        A little bit wrong - First we agree with them, declare full support for the political will of the fraternal people
        Ukraine, and for our part, are joining the ATO, and here, already nasty rebels begin to seize tanks, artillery, ammunition, riflemen and borders with impunity - and let the whole world try to object to us - this is our typical mess!
        In my opinion, it would have been a good thing, sanctions will also be canceled.
    36. 0
      28 July 2014 19: 08
      Declare sanctions, isolate from the world community, find the perpetrators and call to account! laughing
    37. 0
      28 July 2014 19: 29
      It is strange that they did not accuse the Russians and Putin of stealing weapons from Afghanistan and transferring them to militias smile
    38. 0
      28 July 2014 19: 33
      Arming terrorists.
    39. 0
      28 July 2014 19: 43
      Quote: almost demob
      Amazingly, every captive dill is indignant in the first place that they don’t pay wages! They kill children, but they don’t get paid. These are no longer people, this is some kind of garbage!

      Well, yes, they would pay, and everything is OK. And they let go to moms for the weekend, to dumplings. Rested - and continue to kill ...
    40. 0
      28 July 2014 20: 03
      Bring the USA to the Gagatribunal for arming terrorists!
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 20: 08
        Quote: da Vinci
        Bring the USA to the Gagatribunal for arming terrorists!


        This tribunal has long been sold.
    41. 0
      28 July 2014 20: 06
      Putin probably stole their weapons laughing
    42. 0
      28 July 2014 20: 09
      Well, we are waiting for news that the American Apache was shot down by the American Stringer MANPADS.
    43. +4
      28 July 2014 20: 12
      Quote: RusDV
      We would love to "lose" a tank brigade on our border ...

      If barges with tanks drown in the Dnieper in Smolensk, then they can emerge in the same Dnieper somewhere in Dnepropetrovsk or Zaporozhye hi
    44. Mercucio
      0
      28 July 2014 20: 20
      Who, who has this weapon ... The Afghans. The question is different: for the Afghans, supervised by the West, or for those who want to shed as much Pendo blood as possible? In fact, this is a rhetorical question, which worried the "sowers of democracy" tongue
    45. Aibolit
      0
      28 July 2014 20: 25
      The Soviet Union has done so much to promote communism, and Russia does not sway in any way to promote democracy ... Until the roasted rooster pecks, we will not move ....
    46. 0
      28 July 2014 20: 48
      By the way, an automatic machine with a caliber of 7.62 does not ricochet on the grass and reaches the target through the bush.
    47. +1
      28 July 2014 22: 08
      The most liquid product in those parts where the dollar or euro is more universal. Therefore, it is not surprising.
    48. Mishanya 84
      0
      28 July 2014 22: 26
      Then the inhabitants of one country lost their brains when they jumped. Did not find? laughing
    49. 0
      28 July 2014 22: 54
      In the United States recognized the partial loss of weapons supplied to Afghanistan

      In a week or two, this weapon will "partially" be found in the "Poroshenko" militants.
    50. 0
      29 July 2014 03: 42
      Recently, I look at pin. Dosam liked to mow under a fool i.e. under Psuku! wassat Here "did not count", they did not take into account wassat request
    51. 0
      29 July 2014 05: 22
      Сейчас собираются поставлять оружие у.кропам. Интересно сколько потом сотен тысяч стволов не досчитаются.
      Нашпиговали оружием различные регионы мира, спровоцировали войны, сколько угрохали гражданского населения. И пытаются учить демократии и качать права.
      Будет когда-нибудь на них управа?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"