Tips just in case, and the cases are different ...

143
The following advice comes from a former employee of the GRU, hiding under the nickname Raccoon. Unfortunately, all contacts with him are lost. The scenario is similar - civil war or war.

... Anyway, the scenarios can be different. The essence is always the same: you need to go through the first two weeks, and then "it will be visible" (and this does not mean that you need to stay at home for two weeks). The “A” scenario should not strain you much, if they transfer Chechey or some other Kaku to Moscow, then there will be people for “work” on them. You do not have to climb into this. That rule number one was born. No need to go anywhere, especially in the "fight". For this there are always "scumbags." Your task is to “save labor resources”, that is, yourself.

As for the two remaining options. In the case of "B" will have to fight, if you want, of course. In the case of "B" - you can no longer fight. Homeland pissed off. You will decide for yourself, according to the situation. You can “death of the brave”, you can work and live on if they give.

The main thing to remember, there will always be about three degrees of "ass." Local battles, full-scale war, unpromising occupation, followed by the dismemberment of the country. I explain this so that there is an understanding of a very important point, which people usually forget during stress: your actions depend on the situation. No amateur, only common sense.



Shooting outside is not the end of the world. Even if you have a primary treatment station for the wounded at the entrance, and an 120mm mortar calculation in the yard, this does not mean that you need to run urgently (although if the mortar, then the position must be changed, it will certainly be smashed along with you).

Yes, firing and corpses does not mean anything, oddly enough. An untimely maneuver "to go to hell" can cost you your life. Do not fuss, do not panic, see who and at whom shoots, and most importantly why.

Tips just in case, and the cases are different ...

While we are in town

If in the course of events and unrest, you have decided to run, then I will try to briefly spread your chances. In a city like Moscow or St. Petersburg there are very few chances to survive. There is not enough food in the cities and no one will distribute it in case of unrest. There is food only in stores and on food bases (you can forget about them, troops or bandits will appear there immediately).

It makes sense to buy food on the first day, when they are still selling; more shops will close, and the staff will start all tyrit. If the moment with the “purchase” is clicked, then the gun in hand and go “privatize”. I advise you to contract for this business with a neighbor and not just one; first, you will carry away more food, since you still need someone to cover you from the same young people who met you inside or on the way back; secondly, the firepower with a smoothbore is somewhere around zero and an extra pair of barrels will not hurt, but remember, if you gather too many people with you, then you will have a “group goal” and “sharing” the swag will be very sad ( 3 – 4 man, no longer need to take with you).

Of course, you must have water and food in your apartment. With water is still worse, there will be no delivery. If the water from the tap disappears - you have a toilet bowl. DO NOT DARE TO WALK THIS WATER! It is no different from water from the tap, one standpipe with cold water. And this is a week to live and not to grieve (well, not to die, for sure). If possible, a couple of jerry-cans in my teeth and “gut” a gas station. Fuel is very important. But remember, you can't keep him in the apartment. Vapors are highly flammable. Make a caches, better in the attic, in the basement, people will hide from shelling.

You will hardly be killed. On the "muddy water" no one spends ammunition on people without weapons. Of course, this is not a reason to go full-length for a walk before going to bed, but remember that you are not the target number XXUMX. As the experience of the city of Grozny has shown, it is quite realistic for the men howling in full force to completely ignore the locals, not to them. Of course, the "fool" can always fly, especially at dusk, but still not so bad.



Remember that you should not be located either near the television center or with the infrastructure object, and, of course, if people with weapons entered the apartment and “informed” you that they now have machine-gun crew here, then you say “OK , settle down "and dump. No "This is my property, I will not go anywhere" - this is a bullet in the forehead right away, they are not up to you, you will interfere - you will lie. Leave even if not asked. Since their opponents can “cover” your apartment at any moment, and they will not shoot with slingshots.

It’s better not to jump in front of the hospital either. The parties to the conflict will bring the wounded there, perhaps they will try to win back this strategic building. There will be firing. In the case of the bombing, someone will surely zhahnet at the hospital, do not even hesitate, those who wrote the Geneva Convention are usually not in GT, which makes it somewhat conditional. As in "Pirates of the Caribbean": "This is not a set of laws, but rather a set of rules desirable for execution."
Remember, once such a batch began, your property no longer exists. And I strongly advise not to arise. You need to kill if someone pulls your hands to your food and water. Everything else is nonsense. If you exchange the car for a machine gun in the armory room of the nearest police station, then you are a great fellow. Even if you exchanged a new Mercedes for used AKSU and the entire 2 – 3 store, then you are still a great fellow. You no longer need the machine. You cannot leave 100% on it from the city, but the desire to shoot at you will be very serious. While you are in the city I do not advise you to wear camouflage clothing, otherwise it may “fly”.

So what we predicted now. In our city "M" street fighting began. We made the decision, due to circumstances or for tactical reasons, to stay in the city (although this thought is bad, almost always). We know that shops can be started to be robbed already on the second day, there are weapons in the nearest police station, there is little water in the toilet bowl (getting a couple of bottles of drinking in the store is even better), your property is no more, the person with the weapon is always right, where there is a man with a weapon - you should not be, who dress as a military man - he fights (even if he does not want), a cache with fuels and lubricants is a big plus (fuel and lubricants, by the way, can become currency comparable in liquidity with weapons and ammunition) don't even come close.



And one more thing. NEVER WON'T NEVER GO EASILY, ESPECIALLY "SEE THAT THERE." In a city battle, many things are done “quietly,” by reconnaissance and sabotage. Any reconnaissance group, seeing you, 100%, will cut you. This is shown in the films with a finger "quietly", and they go on. In real life, you will be killed on the spot. Their survival and performance of the task depends on the absence of witnesses. Moreover, a group that has taken a position in a city battle, maneuverable, will do the same if you "light up" their positions and move on. Even the machine gun crew at the intersection, which has just “dug in” will not have warm feelings for you. So if they noticed you from afar and called you to “talk” with your finger, turn around and run at full speed. Guys can smile, look affable, lure swag - come, and everything changes. Local often have to "work out" if they are caught along the way. So we don’t ask any questions, we don’t crawl out of our “shell” once again.



We decided to leave the city

Now we start dumping out of town. The problem is this: either the city is blocked, or battles take place in it. If you, due to circumstances, missed the moment of the beginning of active battles - this is very bad, but it does not mean that you are doomed. You can always leave the city. Here, regardless of the situation, there are two points. The first: the movement in the city, the second: the passage through the cordon. There are ring roads around large settlements - this is the main problem.
Motorized riflemen on the boxes for a few hours, moving on smooth asphalt, will take the city into a ring. If this happens, then immediately discard all thoughts of “slipping imperceptibly.” Any “incomprehensible” movement is, in the fighting conditions, a turn at once, and the golden rule “I don’t see - I don’t shoot” often does not work. At the cordon we are going to surrender in good faith. But we have not reached this point yet ...

Yes, one more thing: DO NOT GET IN THE CAR! Any transport in the city will be fired 100%.

So, we have a backpack with a swag that is necessary for survival, ideally, a small-sized weapon (aksu + pistol, a standard Cop kit), and another small bag duplicating the main backpack, only on a much more modest scale (for example, in a backpack you have food for three days, and in the bag for another day, etc.). Bag closer to the body, and do not take off. It is very important to take with you separately, even in your underpants, carry all the jewelry that you find.

Backpack cover with a white sheet and fasten it on it. This is necessary so that any warrior who spotted you (and there will be many such people, and don’t even hope to pass the city imperceptibly) will see that you are a CIVILIAN and have not decided to “open” your position for you. You will be escorted to the sight, and you will go further. Of course, you are not marching along the main avenue, but you don’t need to be covered in mud, a la Schwarzenegger - they will graze you and shoot you, because they don’t understand who you are and what you are. Accordingly, there is no camouflage on you.

You are a civilian and should look like a civilian, with a white backpack, like with a white flag, otherwise they will shoot him. You have to show with your appearance that you are of no interest, you are simply dumping. Of course, the weapon with you, but not carrying it over your head, but hiding. Pistol in pocket (cocked). Automatic, if you got hold of - (ideally Aksu), fold the butt and hide under the jacket. I advise you to remove the fuse on the machine immediately, it can be hard, you can get confused. Chuck in the chamber, of course. There should be no voluminous things on the chest, a maximum hidden automaton - if you have to fall, then you will lie on any purse that will lift you above the ground, it will be easier to get into you.

If a man with a weapon goes to you in a straight course, stop and “without tricks”, in the positions of his comrades. He, most likely, will gut you on a swag, would like to shoot - would have already shot. You will take a backpack - give it away (we would still give it to the exit of the city, at the cordon), ask to leave a sheet (throw it on your back) and a bag (a small one, into which we duplicated everything in a smaller amount). This is a purely psychological moment, we calmly give up big things and ask us to leave small ones, as a rule, people agree, our calculation was from the very beginning. Exit with a bunch of swag nobody will, everyone needs.

We say that we have a machine gun (we don’t get it and show it, but calmly talk about its availability) and we ask you to leave it - take 100%, but this will allow you to save the gun (don’t speak about it, if you give the machine away, you are unlikely to shmon) , the machine gun would have been noticed in this way, and if you immediately surrendered it, it means that you are “non-probable”. You, as it were, exchange your things for your own. If there was no gun, it was possible to take a smoothbore in a disassembled form, the main thing is to give "a large and terrible weapon." We proceed from the fact that since you stayed out of the cordon and street battles, you didn’t just watch ads on TV, and already went to the market in the nearest OM.

About the speed of movement, if you walk through the city 10 – 15 kilometers a day, then this is a great speed. Remember that you will not go straight, and will wind through neighborhoods, as there will be local battles. Accordingly, if the map from your home to Kad 10 kilometers - it does not mean that you will pass them for a day. Go HAPPY. Usually they move at night, but any fool that goes into the night will get a bullet from 10 from 10. We go in the afternoon with a white sheet, we give up, we will hide - we will gather fire on ourselves.



You reach the cordon or barrage cordons, drop the gun, and with your hands up high in an active voice demonstrating that you are here, showing a white rag, you go to the soldiers. You do not go anywhere, you go to a roadblock or a support post, if you have to go to it with raised arms 200 – 300 meters. The point is that the post is equipped for "reception" and there the soldiers feel more comfortable, respectively, the desire to shoot will be less. You are beginning to shmon. You have already thrown off the weapon, you are a “quiet man in the street”, an officer will come to you. Most likely, any lieutenant, not older. This is to ensure that you do not need to especially cherish it. Offer to exchange values ​​for "the right of passage." Of course not with subordinates. If everything went well, then you left the city.

On the way, you 100% lose almost all swag and all weapons, spending a funny distance 1 – 2 of the day. AND THIS IS NORMAL. The ring city is a huge camp of prisoners. You can give all that you want, just to get out. Because inside the hunger will begin and soon enough.

So, we go carefully, but do not hide as "scouts". We are dressed as civilians and we have a white rag on our back (from the front it will be seen that you have no weapons, but from the back it will be unclear about the weapons, you need to secure it). We have a small bag with a vital swag. There is jewelry (gold) as currency. Weapons with which we do not forget to part before approaching the military at the post (if you are accepted with a weapon, it will be explained that you will be a civilian; you will either be recorded as a deserter or a disguised enemy). If you are half-empty out of the city for 1 – 3 of the day, moving from area to area, then this is normal.

From personal experience: ordinary peanut sneakers are very nutritious. 6 double sneakers is the daily allowance for kcal for a man. Warm food may not come out (most likely). Snickers is certainly not a buffet, but the war is on, do not pick and choose in terms of food. Subject with snickers honestly stolen from the Chechens. They fight on them. You can have a bite right on the way, a very good topic, with sugar, glucose, mood raises (considering that you will be in a terrible psychophysical state - glucose is very useful).



The main thing is to understand that the guys with machine guns are very tense, they are shooting at them. To give them a reason to shoot at you is very easy. So be careful not to show off. Muzzle easier to agree on everything.

So, now I will briefly tell you where and why you should dump. Remember, up to this point we have deliberately disassembled the toughest SCENARIOS. Now we do the same. I do this on purpose, “why?”, I think, no need to explain.
So, the worst option: we almost without food and weapons were outside the city. Ideally, each of you should take, in advance (now), a map and cover a few places on the map where you can retreat. NO COMMUNICATIONS! Let the foam go, and there you will already understand where and what is happening. You must choose places according to the direction of the parties to the light. A simple example: SPB. To stumble on the West is not necessary, most likely. To the South, too, without meaning. You will go either to the North, to Karelia, or to the East to the Novgorod, Tver, regions. With Moscow, approximately, also, the North (Arkhangelsk direction) or East (Ural range).

Remember: DO NOT approach military targets! The idea that “their own Russian soldiers”, on the base in the region, will receive and feed, is nonsense. In the best case, the officers will send you, they are not up to you, this is not a reception point for refugees. But the fact that they can begin the bombing of an object is an objective reality. Just do not forget the next moment: now the delay is "next" to the house. If the "batch" has begun, it is better not to even imagine what is going on in the minds of the military, relatives and friends, who may still remain in the city. Remember - all people. The military is also experiencing, nervous and psycho, like all ordinary people. But they do it in arms. So the idea that “the soldiers will help” is not the best.

In general, according to the mind, you should have a “house in the village,” in which there is a cesspool of canned meat, canned food, water, medicines, etc., in the subfield, where you must retreat. The Chechens did this, went to the villages and villages. But we proceed from the worst scenarios, since many of such real estate do not have.

So, I find it easier on the example of Petersburg. Now I will count on the map. So, for each direction we should have at least two places. Close and far. For a friend I recommend using any tourist campsite near a small settlement. If you used to be in the nature of some lake or river, such as barbecue, then you can go there. First, you will know what to expect. You will understand the availability of drinking water and food there. Secondly, you know the place. This will greatly support you psychologically. Refugees are a very sad picture, it is hard to look at them. But the "gregarious" exodus of refugees may not be organized by anyone, and you will dump one and without an end point where "some" red cross will take you. Most likely, it will be so, do not even doubt it.

The first serious "benefactors" appeared in Chechnya after the first war. Two years the civilians were left to themselves. So, we have two points near the city. Now we need two points for a “deep” retreat. If we retreat to the North, I would suggest the Solovetsky Monastery (on an island in the White Sea). There is a pic. Rabocheostrovsk, it has a ferry. Of course, there will no longer be any ferry, but at the river station you can always “privatize” the rowing boat. The White Sea is relatively calm. It is real to swim (it is difficult - but it is possible, you have no more reason to whine, so we row). In the East, I would retreat to the Iversky Monastery in Tver. It is also located on a small island in the middle of the lake. Nearby there are food warehouses and production (on the highway M10).



Why monasteries? They will not be bombed in the first place (this does not mean that the list of targets on the second stage will not change). Yes, one more thing: leave the thought about Christian virtue immediately. No one is waiting for you there and you will not be happy. You go there to really be sold into slavery. You will work for them, housework, guard or something else - they will feed you. You go and say at once: "I am a strong healthy man, I will do any work for you, for food." About the moral and moral responsibility of priests before the laity - forget right away, and better not even open your mouth about this.

Of course, everything is conditional. You can choose another place. But the main principle: your property is no more, you are quite happy, to be in a semi-slave position if you are fed. By the way, the absence of your property also means that no one else has it. Anyone who cannot protect his property with a weapon does not possess property. This is to talk: how to get a car.

Of course, no public transport already exists. We are a plus is that you can now get in the car. The car can be "privatized" or found abandoned. It is not necessary to touch an abandoned car with an empty tank. You will not get fuel and lubricants, and even if you push it, nothing will shine at the gas station. Get used to the car - hang it with white rags, ideally make a “red cross” on the roof with red scotch (this is not a panacea, they also bomb such transport, but the chances are they will score more on you).

Need to move slowly! 50 – 60 km / h. This is done for one simple reason: on the track there can be ribbons with the military, if you go fast on them, some “Ivan” can shoot “just in case”. Any civilians who want to stop you - are not listed - gas (they will not share with you, but they will ask you to “share”). If a ribbon or a separate box - brake on the side of the road and stick out, upwards, out the window or the door ajar, hands. It is not necessary to leave the car (you will leave - a desire to send you will appear). Quietly and without nerves, sit and pray to yourself. "Burn" guys look - I do not advise, look at the floor or ahead.



If everything worked out, then you have a roof over your head, work, food and people with whom you can talk (this is also important). Now you can wait a week or two, see what is happening, assess the situation in the country and make further decisions.

Now a little cynicism. If you have a carriage from your family with you - you are dead. If you have a family, then you must leave the city and find yourself in a country house (with food and water supplies) in the very first seconds, as soon as people on the streets began to complain about the Great Pu. If you do not have positions for retreat and have a "baggage" - you are a two hundred hundred, and a baggage too. Do not be stupid, get ready in advance, close WHERE YOU NEED VEZTI. And they should have food. Then do what you want. If you want - go back and fight, if you want - go back to the clubs while your wife is “on potatoes”. But most importantly think about them in advance, then it will be too late. All that I have told so far is all for “loners” who have nothing to lose. If there is a family - get ready in advance. As shown story - the family is more expensive than the Motherland, at the first stage at least.



We decided to take part in the fighting

Further I will tell about some specific features on a DB. How to behave if you have seen enough of patriotic films and decided to “die by the graves of grandfathers.” So that this does not turn into a “virtual club of thugs” - I will tell some specific trivia with theses.

So, we start to butt. This could have happened from the very beginning, or we previously ran and hid. The main thing is to understand that even if you are Rambo, you will not do anything alone. War is a team sport. Therefore, you need to definitely join one of the parties to the conflict. Once again: you can not fight alone! Someone fed and even supplied Vasya Zaitsev with ammunition, so without tricks, commandos. Agree to volunteer for any of the dirtiest work, but as part of the Armed Forces. Even if they make you a “shrew” - that’s good too.

Immediately I say, any thoughts, aspirations and hopes that everything will be simple and understandable - drop immediately.
- In the troops, no one always understands anything. Most of the officers are tyrants, and the number of moral monsters who are eager to fight will be off-scale. And this is normal (or rather not normal, but the norm). Remember, no matter how clever you are, you put your brains in as deep as possible and do everything exactly as they say. Even if it is some kind of stupid evidence, you DO NOT IMPROVE. All in accordance with the statute and orders. Whoever starts “clever”, no matter how logical and reasonable it seems, will always get lost.
- Remember, if “yours” are yelling at you, this is not bad. No need to snap. Bad when they shoot at you. And sometimes it happens, as it is rather difficult to figure out where their own and where others are. Fights are maneuverable and positions change constantly. You can confidently lead a few hours of battle, until the headquarters realize, through radio communications, that you shoot at each other. So it happens. And then it is not necessary to make claims to “opponents”, they did not like it either.



- Remember the weapon is always on guard. You only take it off if you start shooting or go to the “head patrol” (but YOU are unlikely to find yourself there, the commanders will not risk it). If near you, on the march, there is a blockhead with the fuse removed - correct it. DON'T PULL HANDS TO WEAPONS. Correct the words, tell him about the fuse. If he refuses, then decide for yourself: you can tell the sergeant or the officer, you can score as you wish. But remember that a lot of guys are packed in 200 because of the idiots who are carelessly handling weapons. On the other hand, the fighter you substitute in front of the commander may then shoot you. Decide for yourself. Better stay on your own and press it yourself, if the character allows.
- Weapon NEVER direct on its. Even in the "joke", even the fuse, even with the store unbuckled. For such a focus, you will be "punished."
- On the AC fuse has three positions. Actually, the lock, automatic fire and single. If you are in a panic abruptly remove from the fuse, then surely lower it until it stops and put, thereby, in the mode of a single lamp. This was done so that a soldier who was distraught with horror would not squander the store in a second and be left without cartridges. Remember this.
- The fuse on the AK clans enough vile. If you need to remove it quietly, then pull it off and smoothly transfer to the desired fire mode (it is, almost always, a single fire).
- Jump on the spot before exiting. Check that nothing clanges and jerks at you. It is better to rewind the arms on the arms with tape or tape beforehand. Chuck in the chamber, and the fuse.
- Examine the firing tables on your weapon. The bullet flies NOT DIRECTLY. She has a ballistic trajectory with elevations and depressions. Therefore, competent determination of the distance to the target and knowledge of the table of firing is a good opportunity to hit quickly, which means to reduce the time while shooting at you.
- Wind affects the trajectory of the bullet. Learn the effect of the wind on your weapon in advance, and not the campaign and by eye.
- If you had the opportunity to choose a weapon - take the same (same caliber) as most of your comrades. There are not a lot of bullets on you, but they end quickly, especially in the city, so if you can share with you, this is a big plus. If your friend is killed, do not hesitate to replenish your ammunition (after receiving permission from the commander).
- If you go to the “autonomy”, then you take on yourself 360 cartridges (these are 12 stores) and as many more, but in packs you just throw them into the backpack. Greatly save on weight.
- Remember that the stores located on the chest and abdomen - this is additional armor.
- Most of the deaths and injuries occur from fragments. An ordinary padded jacket is quite capable of protecting you from small fragments. Hanging over the top and unloading shops - you can consider yourself relatively protected. Do not forget to raise the gate.



- Bulletproof vest is very good. Any. Even the most useful.
- If a bullet hit you in a bronik - this does not mean that he saved you. Since the energy of the bullet, stopped by the element of armor, can inflict terrible injury on you. Ribs almost always breaks. And possible and organ rupture. So if there is no hole in you - this is not a reason to rejoice. It happens that the hole would be "preferable."
- Do not touch the grenade launchers. Shoot them hard. Leave it to more experienced comrades.
- After spending a few days in the fresh air, a smoker can be detected in 70 – 100 meters. Quit smoking.
- If you heard something, stop the group and “give silence”. Listen carefully. Even if you slow down the group every five minutes, only rare idiots will swear at you.
- You never stop, continue to stand. You need to kneel or lie down. This is very exhausting, but it is a question of the survival of the whole group. If someone is lazy to sit down - make him.
- There should be no finger on the trigger, even if the weapon is on a safety guard.
- On the marches, put the machine gun on your hands and fold them on your chest with a cross. So it is easier to carry. In this case, the thumb of the right hand is always ready to unlock the fuse, and raise the weapon quickly enough.
- A belt (automatic) is always on the neck. Otherwise, if you are ambushed, there will be a mine explosion and you will fly one way, and your weapon to another, and you will turn from a light 300 into 200.
- At the post do not sleep. If you fall asleep, not only enemies will want to shoot you. In the Second World War for this, as well as for the loss of weapons, officially shot. Now they shoot unofficially.
- You can pee kneeling without turning into a standing growth target.
- To go to the toilet ONLY two by two. One shit - the second covers. If no one wants to go with you, bear with it.
- Sneeze into yourself.
- Who runs slowly - quickly dies.
- The effectiveness of grenades is overvalued. There were cases when grenades exploded in a small room, and inside there were only light contusions.



- Cheku teeth to pull out. Only with your fingers.
- If you carry out a sweep (the last hours of your life), then, as in a joke: you go in the room together, first the grenade, then you.
- Standing in front of the door and waiting for your comrades who are going to storm, hold the door so that it was not open. Otherwise, in the corridor you will see either a grenade or a trunk.
- Roll the grenade on the floor. Do not throw.
- We rolled a grenade, an explosion, threw another, but unbroken. Let them crawl again.
- Do not run in front of the trunk of a friend. You block him from shooting.
- Any closed door is UNCONSISTENT, as it can be mined.
- Do not open the boxes, do not turn on the electronics. Do not touch anything. Everything can be mined. It is important. Up to the point that you can not open the refrigerator, even if you really want to eat, and lift the lid of the toilet.
- In the walls there may be breaches hung with rags or carpets. So the enemy can quickly run from the front to the front. Remember this. The fact that you are in an extreme apartment does not mean that you cannot enter through the wall from the next one.
- On the window you can hang nets from the old Soviet beds. They stop VOGI well.
- You can hear meowing, for example, because of a door of a closet. I'm sorry, but the animal is doomed. Most likely, he was locked there with a grenade. Can not open. This is a very difficult moment, always, in such difficult situations I want to be a man, but ...



- If you need to shoot from the room on the street, then do not crawl to the window sill or stand at the side of the window. Go deep into the room, stand on a stool, closing the wall or the like. And do not turn on the light, you can not, do not highlight yourself (I'm not talking about WU).
- Splinters of brick or concrete, broken by fire, have properties to fly on you. When you hit your eyes ... well, you understand.
- From a grenade launcher to shoot at people is useless. Although now, it seems, they began to make high-explosive fragmentation shells, but, IMHO, this is heresy.
- It’s a bad idea to shoot for a long time without changing position.
- Bend down.
- No need to "calculate snipers." Not your job, and you will not have enough knowledge. Fight further, "not paying" attention.
- Be prepared, morally, to “work out” the civilians who lit up you. Including women and children. If the prospect is not happy, then move carefully.
- At AK – 74 (a copy with good accuracy of the battle), you can fasten the sighting of the SOB from the SVD. At distances 500 – 600, the AK – 74 and the SVD are very closely connected with the trajectory, the sight will fit perfectly. You will shoot and carry fire, because of the caliber, much faster than with the SVD. And those who decide to look for a sniper, you will be uninteresting.
- It is NOT IMPORTANT to shoot from a grenade launcher. He has a platoon time. He needs to fly 15 – 25 meters before the grenade is cocked. Accordingly, in the room, it just does not work.
- Modern RGO and RGN grenades explode FIRST from the impact. They have a shock fuse, and an explosion through the gap - it works self-destruct (in case the grenade fell into the loose snow).
- No one, even the sappers, are not engaged in the removal of mines and slaves. They stupidly undermine their TNT saber. Do not be clever and begin to shoot VU.
- Stretching, normal warriors, put secrets so that it would not be removed in a simple way. So “cutting the thread” is a bad idea. Just pass by. This is not your business, for this there are senior comrades. I will not teach you how to do WU and stretching. I think you understand that this is an article right away. Learn the first medical aid.
- When injuries are venous and arterial bleeding. They are “treated” in different ways. But another thing is important. In the heat of battle there is no time. With venous bleeding, a friend will die for several hours, and with an arterial 10-20 seconds, and then loss of consciousness and hypoxia begins. So, in order not to bathe, you quickly put an arterial burn over the wound (now interns will begin to resent, but such is life, this is not a citizen, you have to break) and return to battle. Your friend will have half an hour or an hour to figure out himself, or you will do it when you are free.
- Harness is always at hand! Neither in a bag, nor in a backpack - or wound on a butt, or in unloading near at hand.
“Always TWO harnesses with you!” One you can give to the wounded comrade and in a minute get a bullet in the femoral artery.
- There is such a thing as "suppression by fire." Actively watering the enemy, often, you can pin down his actions, even without falling and not causing damage to manpower. Especially help you tracer.
- Remember the tracer, besides the fact that the trunk is very much impacted, they also give out your position. So do not abuse them. And it is difficult to carry out aimed fire.
- Weapons need to be cleaned every day. Especially gentle around the muzzle brake. If there is a groove or fossa, then the accuracy of the battle will fall dramatically.
- The last three patrons in the store, it is better to score tracer. To empty the store did not come as a surprise to you. Moreover, if you leave one cartridge in the barrel, then you will only need to whip up a new store, that is, the recharge rate will increase.
- Watch your feet, do not be lazy to wash them. Nate and you are no longer a warrior. - If you see that you can shoot at someone, this is not a reason to shoot. If you have not noticed, ask the commander whether you can get involved in a fight.
- If you notice someone, but you have not yet seen, do not jump sharply to the side. Peripheral vision will give you away instantly. Gently and smoothly, take your time, sit down and calmly take a stand. It will be much less noticeable.
- Remember, the sending cartridge in the chamber, the shutter must be released abruptly to clang. Otherwise, "zhevyuet."



Equipment list

FOR WAR! Not for camping! Designation system: items marked with an asterisk are items whose purchase is NOT paramount. I write things for different seasons mixed up (but this does not mean that all this needs to be put into one backpack), it’s not necessary to drag everything out of failure, of course. You should have everything in your home. So that you can change equipment yourself for different tasks. Immediately make a reservation, I'm not a fan of "Slides". I prefer a good dense field uniform and on top of the camouflage, so that the "Gorky" in the list will not be.

Rags

1. Bertsy. Conditions for choosing two: to not miss the water, and weight. Choose the easiest.
2. MINIMUM five pairs of socks (including winter ones).
3. Tight pants
4. Thermal underwear
5. Several t-shirts, only cotton
6. Tight field jacket
7. Belt
8. Maskhalat (both summer and winter)
9. Fleece jacket (instead of a sweater, it is lighter, weight is very important)
10. Winter jacket and winter pants
11. Winter boots (I advise "Husky with. 080" - cheap and cheerful)
12. Winter hat (knitted, do not have earflaps to drag, it is heavy)
13. Cap or Panama, for the summer. Better panama from tarpaulin, that would even slightly kept moisture. In the alloy there is such an inexpensive one.
14. Winter scarf
15. "Arafatka"
16. Gloves or mittens for winter

Equipment and equipment

1. Backpack raid on 60 liters
2. Assault Backpack on 25 liters *
3. Five points *
4. Sleeping bag
5. Knee pads
6. Canvas Cloak
7. Folding mat
8. Unloading *
9. Body armor
10. NVG *
11. Active Headphones *
12. Ballistic glasses *
13. Broneshlom, or, in the worst case, a helmet
14. Jar or hydrator
15. Small infantry shovel
16. Landing Rope 50 *
17. Kettle with popkotelnik
18. Gas-burner
19. Carbine
20. Compass
21. Paracord 20 meters
22. Fork spoon
23. Makeup
24. Mirror
25. A set of threads and needles
26. Matches
27. Gun cleaning kit
28. Gun oil
29. Talc
30. Shooting gloves
31. Insulating tape
32. Heat sources
33. Lamp
34. Tactical Weapon Belt *
35. Knife
36. Clock watch
37. Pencil
38. Paper
39. Army radio *
40. Poncho
41. Insect repellent (non-smelly)
42. Binoculars *
43. Range finder *
44. Multitul *

By medicine

Take what you personally need, for your personal sores. Plus: 3 arterial tourniquet, 2 – 3 IPP, a lot of bandages, scissors, suture material, pain medication (tablets, if you have sore teeth, for example), disinfectant. You also need promedol and some HARD antibiotics (but you can hardly buy them at a pharmacy without a prescription). The activated carbon will not be superfluous, but under the loads the stomach, sometimes, begins to deal with this nonsense. I also advise you to collect a set in ampoules of ketanova, dexamethasone and kordiamina. Well, a syringe for them, of course. This is an anti-shock kit. It will not allow your heart to get up due to the fact that the brain collapsed your pressure from pain or blood loss (and as a rule, they are somewhere near).
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +58
    26 July 2014 08: 11
    Good informative article. God grant knowledge gleaned from it
    never needed ...
    1. SVT
      +32
      26 July 2014 09: 27
      Good informative article?
      Further I will talk about some specifics on a DB. How to behave if you have seen enough of patriotic films and decided to "die for the graves of grandfathers."

      Dude lives on the principle of a jackal - you die today. i'm tomorrow.
      If a mess has begun, shops can be robbed already on the second day.

      That is, nothing is clear yet, but the author is already robbing CORONA.
      Cher, not an article, the author is definitely a sofa warrior.
      And another thing that finished off:
      Now a little cynicism. If you have a convoy from your family, you are a dead man.

      Damn, that is, the author is a burnt cynic ala, damn doctor house. living alone. not starting a family. because tomorrow is war.
      Or, according to AFFtar, in case of war you need to leave your family and go to the partisans.
      1. +47
        26 July 2014 11: 26
        I agree with you, an article with a sweetheart. Not so are we and the scoffed bydlo, as the author predicts. The article has useful tips in places, but no more. It is good that such an article did not exist before the start of the Second World War, with such knowledge we would have prosralized the war.
        1. DMB-88
          +25
          26 July 2014 12: 52
          Quote: Max Otto
          I agree with you, an article with a sweetheart. Not so are we and the scoffed bydlo, as the author predicts. The article has useful tips in places, but no more. It is good that such an article did not exist before the start of the Second World War, with such knowledge we would have prosralized the war.


          keep in mind that 25 years in people have brought up a proprietary ideology! Now there is a peaceful life, but do you ask your neighbors for salt or bread or a thousand to pay (as it was before), at best they will not open the door for you, but at worst they will call the cops!
          If we consider that now in peacetime the state needs the civilian population only as a cash cow or as an electorate in elections, then in conditions of hostilities from the state it makes no sense to wait for help!
          Recent events show that it is very difficult to survive in a city in conditions of hostilities, therefore recommendations can be adopted with certain amendments for looters, various bandit formations, etc. And most importantly, the article gives the basic rules of behavior in the conditions of a "civil war".
          Aware - means armed !!!
          PEACE to your Home !!! (and article "+")
          1. +4
            26 July 2014 14: 46
            Quote: DMB-88
            Recent events show that in a city it’s very difficult to survive in a war

            There are interesting articles on this topic.
            "Survival in an occupied city", here -
            http://zbroya.info/ru/topic/67_vyzhivanie/all/#46

            It will not be superfluous either - http://bready.ru/
          2. +3
            27 July 2014 12: 10
            Quote: DMB-88
            keep in mind that 25 years in people have brought up a proprietary ideology! Now there is a peaceful life, but do you ask your neighbors for salt or bread or a thousand to pay (as it was before), at best they will not open the door for you, but at worst they will call the cops!
            If we consider that now in peacetime the state needs the civilian population only as a cash cow or as an electorate in elections, then in conditions of hostilities from the state it makes no sense to wait for help!
            Recent events show that it is very difficult to survive in a city in conditions of hostilities, therefore recommendations can be adopted with certain amendments for looters, various bandit formations, etc. And most importantly, the article gives the basic rules of behavior in the conditions of a "civil war".
            Aware - means armed !!!
            PEACE to your Home !!! (and article "+")

            You're not right. I wrote that we are not so fallen. My neighbors will always help, this is verified, and I will help them. And their military will not scare their civilians with a fright, their own army will help their citizens in any case. And the author sees everything, as they wrote correctly here, from the point of view of a mercenary. As if there were no others in the conflict. Militias in Ukraine, I think, do not shoot civilians.
            1. +4
              27 July 2014 17: 51
              Quote: Max Otto
              And their military will not scare their civilians with a fright, their own army will help their citizens in any case.

              Tell this to the people of the people's republics. APU manned and their money.

              Tell the residents of Moscow "where no one was injured during the shooting of the White House."

              with a fright - they won’t, but what kind of order will they be given ...
              1. -1
                24 March 2015 19: 34
                Such an order will never be given. APU was equipped with funds from central and western Ukraine.
          3. +3
            27 July 2014 15: 50
            25 years in people brought up a proprietary ideology

            Is someone to blame again? Raised ... The eternal search for the guilty with his own insignificance. I was raised this way ... So re-educate yourself!
            And as for the neighbors, whether they help, it depends on the person. Everyone judges by himself. And I turned to the neighbors, and I myself had the opportunity to help them. There were no problems with either bread or money.
          4. 0
            27 July 2014 20: 30
            Quote: DMB-88
            PEACE to your Home !!! (and article "+")
            Your thoughts are bright, but you are an over optimist! You plus article minus.
          5. +5
            28 July 2014 10: 08
            Quote: DMB-88
            Not so we and scumbag

            Each time has its own specifics.

            The decadents were severely burned seriously, expecting total release immediately after the disappearance of the authorities.
            It is worth preparing not only caches, but also friends ...
          6. 0
            28 July 2014 12: 04
            Before writing, I would have thought that the basic rules of behavior are given in the conditions of a "civil war" - many advice is so controversial, eeee !!!

            Take at least advice about weapons, that it is necessary to stock up with a Kalash and a gun, and then surrender only Kalash: but what if they obshmonat as it should and then, like Kalash, let's say ... you then immediately. And you don’t think that just the presence of Kalash is an excuse to put against the wall ...
        2. +16
          26 July 2014 14: 35
          Quote: Max Otto
          such an article did not exist before the start of the Second World War, with such knowledge we would have pissed off the war.

          Let me remind you, because I know for sure, EVERYTHING before the Second World War, the younger generation, in any case, were "Voroshilov's shooters", pioneers-Komsomol members, volunteer assistants to the army-navy and others, who had the skills of autonomous campaigns, handling weapons and much more. Even a brave bayonet fight. What can not be said about the current ...
          And the Second World War was distinguished by the presence of a distinct rear and front, which probably will not be in the current battles ...
        3. +1
          26 July 2014 18: 00
          Quote: Max Otto
          I agree with you, an article with a sweetheart.

          No, just angry.
          And the fact that the author is a loner in life is yes.
          To survive, just to survive, is the principle of a mercenary’s life, by no means a GRU specialist.
          1. s1н7т
            +16
            26 July 2014 18: 42
            Quote: Cynic
            To survive, only to survive _ this is the principle of life of a mercenary, not a GRU specialist

            I do not know who the "special GRU" is, but you are wrong. "Somewhere" once hammered into the head - the task is above all! The life of even a wounded comrade is secondary, if it complicates the task at least one iota (there are nuances here, "not for the press"). Moreover, the life of the civilian population. It is from these positions that he speaks. About 25 years ago I would have said the same, but we did not talk at that time drinks
            1. +1
              26 July 2014 20: 41
              Quote: c1n7
              ... "Somewhere" once hammered into the head - the task is above all!

              Here, as it were, the task is own survival. In an unflattering manner, the salvation of one's own skin.
              Not really, or rather not at all.
              drinks
              1. s1н7т
                +7
                27 July 2014 07: 21
                Quote: Cynic
                Here, as it were, the task is own survival. Impartial, salvation of one's own skin

                Survival itself is an integral part of scout training. If you cannot survive, you cannot complete the task. Although, of course, the author overtook a little creep, but from here, from a citizen, it is impossible to understand the atmosphere of life "there". Believe it or not, we once considered "shpaks" to be half-human laughing I had a friend, a colleague who woke up at night when changing direction or wind strength - the foliage rustled differently. drinks "There" is generally different thinking hi
                1. +2
                  27 July 2014 12: 42
                  Quote: c1n7
                  Survival itself is an integral part of scout training

                  You might think I argue with that.
                  We are about different things.
                  You said _
                  Quote: c1n7
                  an integral part of

                  About this and the conversation, but in the article it is a categorical imperative _ Survive only to Survive, Survive at all costs.
                  Survive for what?
                  Can anyone pay ANY PRICE for their own survival.
                  But this is philosophizing.
                  1. s1н7т
                    +3
                    27 July 2014 16: 56
                    Quote: Cynic
                    in the article it is a categorical imperative _ Survive only to Survive, Survive at all costs.

                    Yeah, survival as an end in itself, I agree. This is probably the author’s reception to make it better laughing drinks delayed
                  2. +2
                    28 July 2014 12: 08
                    If you survive - you have a chance to take revenge. if you die earlier, others will avenge you.
                    1. 0
                      28 July 2014 16: 04
                      Quote: Petrik66
                      If you survive - you have a chance to take revenge.

                      Survivors _
                      1. 0
                        8 October 2015 10: 56
                        Rather, hangers-on.
                  3. +5
                    29 July 2014 00: 39
                    Again, at the beginning of the article it is written - for which:
                    so as not to die in the early days, look around, keep working capacity (read: for further defense / resistance / counteroffensive)
              2. +4
                27 July 2014 20: 35
                Quote: Cynic
                Here, as it were, the task is own survival. In an unflattering manner, the salvation of one's own skin.
                Few understood the true meaning. Judging by the cons. A huge plus! drinks
            2. +1
              28 July 2014 13: 28
              You distort a little -

              1) at least because no task could be performed by any specialists, knowing that their life is secondary to his colleagues. Or "Spetsnaz does not abandon its own" is it for a catchphrase ?!

              2) Any task, in any case, with us, at least in words, is aimed ultimately for the sake of the survival of our people, our country, that is, Russia.

              3) But to clean up your civilians, only because you saw it, and you decided that they had already waited for you, you know that it’s obviously written down as traitors - in fact, you deliberately pit people against each other - it’s clear that such a people is easier to fill up !!!
          2. 0
            27 July 2014 04: 31
            I remember there was such a case on a camping trip, a representative of the KGB was a tourism instructor, and so, he raises tourists in the morning, and says: "They shot from that village, send it to work it out, solely for the sake of pampering."
          3. 0
            29 July 2014 00: 36
            Well, he does not write memoirs, but educational program for civilians ..
            For a comrade - the first harness, for myself - the second
        4. s1н7т
          -1
          26 July 2014 18: 29
          Quote: Max Otto
          article with a choke

          No, just the author is too cynical, probably.
        5. baradec
          +2
          27 July 2014 00: 34
          During the Second World War, the war was different. And what - in besieged Leningrad didn’t they engage in cannibalism?
        6. +1
          29 July 2014 00: 33
          The author at the beginning of the article stated: I proceed from the worst - what should be prepared for
          I agree that there is a risk of meeting two radical readers of this article in the vastness of a hypermarket ...
          But the author does not seem to set up an aggressive attack for swag

          Everyone must determine for himself the measure of possible behavior, and most importantly -
          individual and collective action plan for predicted crisis situations

          The article is very useful - as a basis for creating your own plan.
          Thank you!
      2. Crang
        +16
        26 July 2014 12: 11
        Quote: Svt
        Dude lives on the principle of a jackal - you die today. i'm tomorrow.

        Let's see what you will be right when you find yourself in a real war.
        1. -1
          26 July 2014 13: 08
          I do not know. But. EXACTLY not like that. And you, along with him, will be tidied up very soon by their own.
          1. Crang
            +6
            26 July 2014 18: 10
            Quote: bes513
            I do not know. But. EXACTLY not like that.

            Somewhat self-confident. It would be nice.
        2. -1
          26 July 2014 20: 43
          Quote: Krang
          find yourself in a real war.

          90s can be equated with war?
          1. Crang
            +3
            27 July 2014 11: 03
            No. It is impossible.
            1. -2
              27 July 2014 12: 49
              Quote: Krang
              No. It is impossible.

              Maybe only _
              the country lost 20,4 million people during the Yeltsin decade — 18,9% of the adult population!

              This is one of the optimistic estimates.
              And you say no.
              hi
              1. Crang
                +3
                27 July 2014 14: 43
                Well, I hope you were not a member of an organized criminal group at that time, right? In addition, even the bandits of the 90s acted in a normally functioning city. They had no problems with water and food, with a roof over their heads and heating.
                Quote: Cynic
                the country lost 20,4 million people during the Yeltsin decade — 18,9% of the adult population!

                Yes. They were killed in a showdown, blown up in cars, shot or strangled, but at the same time this whole criminal war took place in peaceful greenhouse conditions. Just someone who will find and figure out before. In which restaurant and in what removable hut.
                1. +1
                  27 July 2014 18: 13
                  Quote: Krang
                  Well, I hope you were not a member of an organized criminal group at that time, right?

                  God was merciful.
                  By the way, organized crime groups are also a way of survival.
                  Quote: Krang
                  Yes. They were killed in a showdown, blown up in cars, shot or strangled, but at the same time this whole criminal war took place in peaceful greenhouse conditions.

                  You know, but I have nothing to say to you, you have a very peculiar idea about the dynamics of changes in the number of people.
                  Just a hint _ It is positive if it is born more than it dies and negative if it is the other way around.
                  Where you lived, were in the 90th dear Crang?
                  1. Crang
                    +1
                    27 July 2014 19: 04
                    Quote: Cynic
                    Just a hint _ It is positive if it is born more than it dies and negative if it is the other way around.
                    Where did you live, were in the 90s respected Krang?

                    In Russia, where else. In the 90s, according to statistics, 1500-2000 contract killings took place every month. This is without taking into account the gangster showdown and the mountains of corpses from here. Plus the Chechen wars. A whole generation of the 70s of the family was practically exterminated. Women don't give birth without men. And yes, it was then, in accordance with the new "values" and living conditions, that one, maximum two children became the norm for a Slavic family, with a minimum norm of 2,5 children per woman. Then on the demographic chart the so-called. "Russian cross" (which still has not returned). But what does this have to do with the survival of the average man in the street? None. So what's the question?
                    1. +1
                      27 July 2014 20: 15
                      Quote: Krang
                      But what does this have to do with the survival of the average layman in a database environment? Nothing.

                      So you lived in the 90s, did not survive. And all the problems _ Purely women did not give birth, such as no one.
                      I don’t know about you, but I remember the cards at one time and there was a salary only in the statement, doo-o-olgo. I had to survive.
                      Quote: Krang
                      it was then, in accordance with the new "values" and living conditions, that one, maximum two children became the norm for a Slavic family,

                      A bit earlier .
                      1. +3
                        27 July 2014 20: 50
                        Quote: Krang
                        Where else in Russia.

                        Quote: Cynic
                        So you lived in the 90s, did not survive
                        Friends, you are talking about one thing, only from different sides of the vision! One speaks of the loss of people in numbers (also a way of war!), The second speaks of real battles and losses in REAL BATTLE! BUT! These are trifles! A battle is being fought against us on different fronts, and losses, whether in real combat, or in unborn children, or in an overdose, are part of the unified system of genocide of the Russian people.
                        P.S. Personally, I think that a man should leave like a man, the overdose I mentioned is cowardice and weakness, but this is subjective! laughing drinks
                      2. Crang
                        0
                        28 July 2014 12: 21
                        Quote: Cynic
                        A bit earlier .

                        No, not before. The Russian cross became a reality in 1992 - the first year of crap democracy in Russia.
                        Quote: Cynic
                        I don’t know about you, but I remember the cards at one time and there was a salary only in the statement, doo-o-olgo. I had to survive.

                        At that time, we lived at the expense of summer cottages on which we planted potatoes, cucumbers, tomatoes, etc. This was a help that allowed us to survive for several months a delay in wages. Yes, things were bad, but it can’t be compared with the war.
                      3. 0
                        28 July 2014 16: 25
                        Quote: Krang
                        No, not before. Russian cross became a reality in 1992

                        И
                        Quote: Krang
                        At that time, we lived at the expense of summer cottages, on which

                        You may be offended, but, as Stanislavsky said there _ I do not believe it!
                        According to the book, everything you said, subtracted. You do not know, in my opinion, those realities.
                      4. Crang
                        +1
                        28 July 2014 18: 17
                        Maybe you don’t know? Or maybe we are from different sides. Personally, at that time I lived in a small provincial town, away from large megacities. So then, in addition to the dacha, where every stray planted, we had two more potato fields. And everyone has it. Plowed there like robots.
                      5. 0
                        28 July 2014 20: 14
                        Quote: Krang
                        then, in addition to the dacha, where every stray planted, we had two more potato fields. And everyone has it. Plowed there like robots.

                        Well, you can express yourself normally, otherwise _
                        Quote: Krang
                        we lived off summer cottages where we planted potatoes, cucumbers, tomatoes, etc. This was a help that allowed us to survive for several months a delay in wages.

                        Well, right from the presentation on the topic The life of citizens in the 90s
                        Quote: Krang
                        Personally, at that time I lived in a small provincial town, away from large megacities.

                        Yes, the picture of life here and there was sharply different then. To me lucky live in a millionaire.
                        hi
      3. +5
        26 July 2014 14: 01
        The fighter in the last photo with female panties on his head ... was very pleased. smile
        1. +2
          27 July 2014 23: 29
          It's ridiculous of course - but when the sun bakes and the infamous swarms in a cloud - here you will put the product number 2 on your head ...
      4. +17
        26 July 2014 14: 29
        Quote: Svt
        in case of war you need to leave your family

        you probably read diagonally:
        Don't be silly get ready in advance, your loved ones SOMETHING TO CARRY. And they must have food. Then do what you want. If you want, come back and fight, if you want, go back to the clubs while your wife is on the potato. But most importantly, think about them in advance, then it will be too late. All that I have told so far is all for the “loners” who have nothing to lose. If you have a family, get ready in advance. As history has shown, a family is more expensive than the homeland, at least in the first stage.
        1. +2
          27 July 2014 13: 00
          Well yes . That's just _ I would know the ransom, I would live in Sochi.
      5. +14
        26 July 2014 14: 32
        Quote: Svt
        Dude lives on the principle of a jackal - you die today. i'm tomorrow.

        Everything is fine with the author; you have a bad sense of humor.

        Quote: Svt
        That is, nothing is clear yet, but the author is already robbing CORONA.

        There is a big difference between what the author said and what you hear / read.
        Quote: Svt
        Damn, that is, the author is a burnt cynic ala, damn doctor house. living alone. not starting a family. because tomorrow is war.

        Yes, old Holmes is resting; your methods of deduction are more progressive.
        Quote: Svt
        Or, according to AFFtar, in case of war you need to leave your family and go to the partisans.

        And again, I do not find a place in the text where the author wrote this.
      6. +18
        26 July 2014 20: 13
        Damn ... I'm sorry, what were you thinking about when you wrote the comments?
        Quote: Svt
        Dude lives on the principle of a jackal - you die today. i'm tomorrow.

        If you have served yours in the armed forces, know how to handle weapons, it will probably not be difficult for you to join your soldiers and then fight according to your own military academy. Then you and these tips as if to nothing special. But if you valiantly escaped military service, and now
        Quote: Svt
        have seen enough of patriotic films and decided "to die for the graves of grandfathers."

        then the person who served and fought will look at you with some neglect. Which, generally speaking, is understandable, the fighters are needed there, and not the sofa warriors with burning eyes, who saw AK only in the cinema. But here this man is still trying to teach something.
        Quote: Svt
        about there is nothing clear yet, but the author is already robbing CORONA.

        If in the city where you live they are fighting with might and main, and you still "do not understand anything" - then who is to blame for this besides yourself? And the author is the author of rights in everything. As soon as the usual barriers (police / militia) are lost, desecration occurs very, very quickly. Therefore, it is necessary to go to "rob cows" with a gun - just in order not to get into the lobshnik from the smoothbore of the riffraff who went out hunting.
        The author does not urge someone to rob / kill, but precautions need to be taken. But, of course, if you are wonderfully convinced that you are surrounded by extremely wonderful and kind people - go with your bare hands, who's bothering you ... Life, it's only yours.
        Quote: Svt
        Now a little cynicism. If you have a convoy from your family, you are a dead man.
        Damn, that is, the author burnt cynic ala, damn doctor house

        Do you have a family? children? I have one. The author writes exactly what needs to be done
        If you have a family, then you must leave the city and be in the country (with supplies of food and water) in the first seconds, as soon as people on the streets began to mate about Great Pu. If you do not have a position to retreat and have a "convoy" - you are a walking two hundred, and a convoy too. Do not be silly, get ready in advance, your loved ones SOMETHING TO CARE. And they must have food

        That is, we don’t sit and do not wait for the development of events, we act IMMEDIATELY as soon as there is a danger of trouble - we take the family out to a safe place, provide them with food there, then when the wife / children are safe - you can act, for example, go to war.
        That's what the author wanted (and said). I do not like? OK, your family.
        1. +3
          26 July 2014 23: 40
          An article as an article for such nerds who have not undergone army training is very useful. And for couch strategists and specialists probably not enough. They always know what and where and to whom it is necessary to insert, how to advance and where to pass. Sofa Marshal is the most marshal in the army of dolbokryakov
      7. 0
        26 July 2014 21: 04
        Quote: Svt
        Good informative article?
        Further I will talk about some specifics on a DB. How to behave if you have seen enough of patriotic films and decided to "die for the graves of grandfathers."

        Dude lives on the principle of a jackal - you die today. i'm tomorrow.
        If a mess has begun, shops can be robbed already on the second day.

        That is, nothing is clear yet, but the author is already robbing CORONA.
        Cher, not an article, the author is definitely a sofa warrior.
        And another thing that finished off:
        Now a little cynicism. If you have a convoy from your family, you are a dead man.

        Damn, that is, the author is a burnt cynic ala, damn doctor house. living alone. not starting a family. because tomorrow is war.
        Or, according to AFFtar, in case of war you need to leave your family and go to the partisans.

        l yes, the analyst friend of you is worthless.
      8. Fedya
        +6
        26 July 2014 21: 43
        Dude lives on the principle of a jackal - you die today. i'm tomorrow.
        Joke: Private Sharaev, what should a good soldier do? A good soldier must die for his homeland!
        To leave! A good soldier must make his opponent die for his homeland!
      9. baradec
        +7
        27 July 2014 01: 03
        @Svt - the author is definitely NOT a sofa warrior.
        Regarding cynicism:
        Yes, cynicism ... in the conditions of occupation, siege, it will flourish in double color. Given the fact that we do not know the neighbors on the landing, in the conditions of chaos, hunger and the struggle for survival, people will change morally ... and not for the better. Look at least at the street in peacetime - how many moral complicity and real help do others give to a poor fellow in an emergency? Or how do office clerks devour each other for promotion?
        And after that, do you think that under siege, doors with joyful faces will open before you? Maybe, but after the fired shot through the door and in order to kick you wounded / killed from the door. Therefore, the current will survive, who is ready for anything. For a sharp breakdown of moral principles, driven into the brain throughout life, causes confusion and depression, panic. And this does not contribute to survival.
        And if you had turned off your EGO and FSW while reading the article, you would have noticed that the worst-case scenarios are being considered.
        Here's about the family: be careful! The author noted that for the sake of the family people sacrifice their "duty to the Motherland" and universal principles. This means that the family must be taken care of at the very first time, and not waffled in front of the TV / radio / Internet for several days until the difficult time becomes the most difficult. And, imagine that elderly people / women / children are not as tactically savvy as the readers of these materials, and can stand up to their full height / sneeze / cough / fart / cry / twist their leg at the most unnecessary moment + a number of other factors. Therefore, there is no need to sit in front of the monitor and get out and argue who is the couch warrior and who is the kitchen special forces.
        PS I read an article by a Serbian survivor (Survivalist) who lived in a city that had been under siege for 2 years. What do you think was the most priced? - weapons / ammunition, fuel, matches, antibiotics. And all this has changed in the black market. You could forget about the money. The only thing they lived in private households. And the percentage of survival depended on the number of hands in the family that could hold weapons. For houses were plundered by looters and families were slaughtered.
      10. +1
        28 July 2014 12: 06
        The author simply suggests that you personally survive. where is cynicism?
      11. Arthur 775
        0
        28 July 2014 22: 37
        Spokuha, Dude just outplayed the stalker. But this is the cost of all the forums, unfortunately.
      12. 0
        7 July 2015 17: 29
        No, this is a mishandled Cossack to arouse fear on the layman, the Services should be calculated according to IP and cleaned up scum.
    2. +14
      26 July 2014 09: 45
      Good informative article. God grant knowledge gleaned from it
      never needed ...


      This information is already damn how much it goes on the Internet. Here they added a bunch of photos. GRU intelligence. So, I do not believe that it was written by a former fighter. Although the information is partially and useful, it is unlikely that someone will prepare it.
      1. padonok.71
        +3
        26 July 2014 12: 59
        GRU GSH - not only intelligence.
        1. s1н7т
          0
          26 July 2014 18: 55
          Quote: padonok.71
          GRU GSH - not only intelligence.

          What else?! Share, plz!
          I’m still sure that the abbreviation GRU means - Main Intelligence Directorate, no?
          1. padonok.71
            +1
            28 July 2014 06: 01
            The Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff included:
            directly reconnaissance units (from company to district), analytical groups, military. translators, counter. army intelligence, sabotage groups (from company to district), security of embassies, encryption departments, property. courier service, physicians, and many others. another.
            T.ch. say - GRU, this intelligence is not entirely true.
      2. s1н7т
        +6
        26 July 2014 18: 52
        Quote: kush62
        GRU intelligence. So, I do not believe that it was written by a former fighter.

        The GRU in other times is a lot of different intelligence. From reconnaissance platoon of battalion to satellites. This right now - h.z. that. At the expense of the "fighter". In military intelligence there were reconnaissance groups, reconnaissance landing groups, reconnaissance assault groups, and special reconnaissance groups. Everyone has different tasks, different training, but they all ultimately worked for the GRU. So there are options, don't you think? laughing drinks
        1. Big den
          +2
          26 July 2014 20: 53
          The GRU in other times is a lot of different intelligence. From reconnaissance platoon of battalion to satellites. This right now - h.z. that. At the expense of the "fighter". In military intelligence there were reconnaissance groups, reconnaissance landing groups, reconnaissance assault groups, and special reconnaissance groups. Everyone has different tasks, different training, but they all ultimately worked for the GRU. So there are options, don't you think? laughing drinks[/ Quote]
          I agree with you that the GRU is all kinds of intelligence and not only, but the article, in my opinion, was written by some "soldier of fortune". All who participated I hope will support that despite the dirt and blood inherent in any war, people there remain people and those who do not really bother completely. On many theses I agree with the author, but on the whole it seems as if it was not written for Russia.
  2. Stasi
    +11
    26 July 2014 08: 21
    Very informative and useful article. It will be interesting to read the opinions of those who fought.
  3. 0
    26 July 2014 08: 36
    ) et some imported fighter wrote a multitool, "arafatka", a poncho))) and other crap.
    1. s1н7т
      +5
      26 July 2014 19: 00
      Quote: formidable
      "arafatka", poncho))) and other crap.

      Some of my comrades still keep, incl. "arafatki". So what about the "crap" you are wrong. laughing drinks
  4. +20
    26 July 2014 08: 45
    Most people live urbanized, i.e. in cities. Few people have a cottage or a house in the countryside. It is in the countryside, not in the suburbs.
    Do you want peace, prepare for war. Most readers of this article will skip this article. Say a year ago in Ukraine, Cho on their territory would be a civil war with the use of hail, would boo and ridicule.
  5. padonok.71
    +21
    26 July 2014 09: 12
    Muddle, mixed up in a bunch, horses, people. Excerpts from the instructions of the Second World War, Afghan, 2nd Chechen, the author’s own inventions are chaos.
    And by the way, they beat us for the "maskhalat". There is a mask. suit, overalls, cape, and "maskhalats", "At home, you will take off your wife!" - so our foreman spoke.
    1. +12
      26 July 2014 09: 23
      They beat me in the training school for saying "Yes" to the place "That's right", but when I came to the army they started beating me for that "That's right" ........
      There is enough absurdity in the army.
    2. wanderer_032
      +5
      26 July 2014 12: 34
      Quote: padonok.71
      "mashalat" we were beaten in training


      It means that you and your commanders were unlucky, you came to the oak trees.
      Which, moreover, did not know well the history of the development of individual camouflage wedges in a soldier. When our ancestors wore greatcoats, they put on masked robes and the name has been preserved in soldier’s everyday life since then.
      1. padonok.71
        +4
        26 July 2014 13: 13
        Not only our ancestors walked in chenels, but we ourselves (and many, "on parade" and now walk). What is in the photo - "covering" is called (up to 40g), then - winter camouflage cape (NMZ 40). It was used very limitedly in WW1 and the Russian-Finnish one, in WWII it was supplanted by a camouflage space (due to the transition to wadded pants and sweatshirts), consisting of wide trousers and a blouse.
        1. wanderer_032
          +2
          26 July 2014 16: 21
          Quote: padonok.71
          Not only our ancestors walked in the chenille, but we ourselves

          I meant the field uniform, these days it is unlikely that anyone will want to wear an overcoat in order to fight in it.
          1. padonok.71
            +2
            26 July 2014 17: 37
            Emphasis on the word WENT. When my service began, everyone went to the chenille.
    3. s1н7т
      +5
      26 July 2014 19: 08
      Quote: padonok.71
      Excerpts from the instructions of the time of the Second World War, Afghanistan, the 2nd Chechen,

      Have you read them? With me they were quite a chipboard and Secret.
      Quote: padonok.71
      And by the way, they beat us for the "maskhalat"

      And here, in the army, before the appearance of camouflage, they said so - a camouflage suit, there was nothing for it laughing After all, we’re fucked, as he was called on the invoice. The main thing is to mask laughing
      1. padonok.71
        0
        28 July 2014 06: 13
        Yes, I read them. In preparation for the second assault. There was no secret whatsoever. Everything was in the public domain. Then, after the second company, special people came, compiled manuals, based on our experience already. Read - a useful thing.
        And for the "ice ax", he received only "ice hammer".
  6. +5
    26 July 2014 09: 30
    About the occupation or the beginning of hostilities in the city, the average man head of the family (with a baggage train) basically learns simultaneously with the "baggage train" and therefore first send the family, and then from above in the described way to save himself ??? And so the article is very informative, thanks!
  7. +19
    26 July 2014 10: 15
    Davannenko did not read such correct and clever articles. I myself spent the winter in Grozny as it happens. Respect and respect, as my daughter says. I hope that civilians will not have to put these tips into practice. Although reading, just in case, is useful.
  8. +8
    26 July 2014 10: 56
    A specific "Survevarium". Practically everything is in the case. But it gets scary when you think that perhaps these advice will have to be put into practice.
  9. +16
    26 July 2014 11: 04
    The article is sensible. Especially for those who have not thought about what to do in case of the arrival of the "Arctic fox" in his city. I also recommend reading the book "Rat Tower" by Pavel Darts. There, of course, everything is very cynical and rather creepy, but in my opinion it is quite real. But the biggest difficulty is that it is very difficult to defend modern houses due to the large number of windows on the ground floors and front entrances.
    But the main problem is absolute infantilism and unwillingness to do anything for the majority of the population. Try to talk to your friends about "what will you do in case .....?" and you will be greatly surprised by the ram's view of the life of most people around you. So, if the "batch" went really bad, then it is better to have a group of like-minded people with weapons and a plan of action in advance.
    Moreover, all of the above by me does not completely cancel the faith in the Commander-in-Chief and our innocence. soldier
    1. +3
      26 July 2014 13: 39
      In the article, the lies are indeed mixed ... from which I think this article was written by a reptile ...

      Yes, one is easier ...
      Yes, with such messes a lot of abomination happens ...
      Yes, everything must be done to survive ...

      But, why the heck you alone need a life, with whom will you continue to live ...? !!!
      But, if you are stupidly afraid ... then you are even faster dead ... !!!
      But, everything must be done in order to survive both for you and your family, and those close to you in spirit ...

      They have already said here, if the majority would have done this in the Second World War, then we would not have been there for a long time !!!

      And yet, p_in_do_ssy ... of course those are still ... but among them there are enough smart people (mind you, I'm not talking about other qualities). So, one of them said:

      "The one who gives up his freedom for safety receives neither one nor the other." Thomas Jefferson.
      1. 0
        27 July 2014 04: 56
        Quote: Dali
        But, why the heck you alone need a life, with whom will you continue to live ...? !!!
        But, if you are stupidly afraid ... then you are even faster dead ... !!!

        demagogy and crackling phrases
        1. 0
          28 July 2014 11: 32
          Here is your answer, really demagogy ...

          There would be something to answer, they would not write in the style of "myself")))))
          1. 0
            28 July 2014 11: 33
            in the style "d_ur_ak himself"
      2. +1
        29 July 2014 01: 09
        The author gave the methodology, and you are talking about motivation.
        Everyone has her own
        1. 0
          30 July 2014 11: 25
          Do you know that for different motivations the methodology is different, and in some respects they can be directly opposite ...

          Quote: Kindof
          Everyone has her own

          Well, et is understandable ... what motivation, such and methodology ...))))))
  10. +9
    26 July 2014 11: 04
    If my grandfather, father and three uncles and a huge number of our Russian soldiers had similar principles, then we would have waged war in the Russian Patriotic War ...
    In principle, it is the psychology of a cowardly gopher, anyhow, its own zh.o.p. save - and the family (the "baggage" in the author's opinion) will not allow this cowardly zh.o.p. to save.
    Vile psychology, for the great W.K.R.ov.
    1. DMB-88
      +7
      26 July 2014 14: 38
      Quote: mik-51
      If my grandfather, father and three uncles and a huge number of our Russian soldiers had similar principles, then we would have waged war in the Russian Patriotic War ...
      In principle, it is the psychology of a cowardly gopher, anyhow, its own zh.o.p. save - and the family (the "baggage" in the author's opinion) will not allow this cowardly zh.o.p. to save.
      Vile psychology, for the great W.K.R.ov.

      I bet you "-"
      justified: Our fathers and grandfathers fought for a huge country of the USSR with communist ideology, there were other moral principles!
      The author of the article is trying to convey to you how to behave in a civil war in cities!
      Why are you distorting and replacing the essence of what is written!
    2. s1н7т
      +4
      26 July 2014 19: 15
      Quote: mik-51
      If my grandfather, father and three uncles and a huge number of our Russian soldiers had similar principles, then we would have waged war in the Russian Patriotic War ...

      You are confusing something, dear. My father also fought in the Second World War. In intelligence. War is a dirty and cynical event. Today we "clean up" the locals who could see the reconnaissance group, and on our return, in the morning, we demonstrate a white collar and shaved cheeks. So it was, is and will be, alas, while people are at war.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 11: 52
        This is something you are confusing ... and my grandfather also told me ... if ours cleaned up their civilians, then the Nazis would have been much more on the side, and if the fascists had been so completely (with all sabotage, etc.) if they didn’t touch civilians, then there would be practically no partisan movement ...

        By the way, your father, how old are you then? It’s hard to believe in it ... and there is something to compare !!!
  11. 0
    26 July 2014 11: 24
    the author, my dirty cousin, also a GRU officer, said that the GRU officer only becomes ex when he dies, and he is ALWAYS an OFFICER of the GRU. draw the correct conclusions
    1. wanderer_032
      +6
      26 July 2014 12: 38
      Quote: sv68
      dirty

      The letter suffers ... Trouble.
      The trouble is trolls.
      1. 0
        26 July 2014 13: 02
        wanderer032-are you ready to answer for your bazaar? if I'm a troll, then you are definitely super-control. minus to you.
      2. 0
        26 July 2014 13: 22
        By the way, when sv68 wrote "nasty" and not "deceased" - he was not mistaken ... guess three times why ...
    2. s1н7т
      +2
      26 July 2014 20: 34
      Quote: sv68
      GRU officer

      He is for operational intelligence - no sideways. A GRU officer, if not a resident officer, is just a desk scout.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 11: 56
        Where are the "firewoods" from? You seem like "armchair"!
        And in special structures, and in Russia not only the GRU ... there are many all sorts of specialists, and not all of them are "armchair"))))))))))
  12. +12
    26 July 2014 11: 26
    Good article. Somewhat overwhelmed by horror, but it is better to overdo it. The main idea - self-esteem (abbreviated ChSD) in the proposed circumstances - a deadly attavism. If you don’t amputate, you won’t survive.
    1. 0
      28 July 2014 12: 29
      But I don't understand why "lack of reasonable behavior" is confused with the presence of self-esteem.

      And I think if you amputate CSD, you may live a little longer, but your family and friends will definitely not survive !!!

      If you do not agree, the arguments (and not the allegations) in the studio!
  13. +7
    26 July 2014 11: 49
    The article is very good and gives very good advice, but in order to adequately evaluate them, you yourself have to be at least once in some trouble. The multitool thing is very useful even in civilian life, not to mention war. In my opinion, only with 50 m. Of the landing rope and with 20 m. Paracord brute force. Such quantities are needed by the squad or battle group, the sapper, an ordinary fighter will have enough 10 times less - 5 and 2 m, respectively.

    About

    Now a little cynicism. If you have a convoy from your family, you are a dead man.


    UTB come from the fact that

    the number of moral freaks who are eager to fight will be off the scale.


    A real psychopath - and there are many of them in the war - never in life to miss the opportunity to mock a defenseless woman. What is the chance to go unnoticed by all psychopaths, let everyone calculate for himself. If you are with your family, you need to get out of the city at night and have a woman with short hair and wear a man’s dress.
    1. 0
      28 July 2014 13: 11
      Quote: ivanovbg
      A real psychopath - and there are many of them in the war - never in life to miss the opportunity to mock a defenseless woman. What is the chance to go unnoticed by all psychopaths, let everyone calculate for himself.


      Controversial statement - how much is it much? If there are so many of them, then the country during the war has no chances to win. And during the civil war, the people of such a country have no chances for survival. So Russia should not have been your way for a long time - there were all kinds of wars in Russia.
  14. +8
    26 July 2014 12: 15
    There is not one, or rather several points.
    1. Keep track of the situation in the country, in the world, in the region. And try to get down sooner than it started.
    2. If you missed or have nowhere to run - go to where there is at least some kind of power, no matter whose. This is a chance for survival because working hands are needed everywhere and by everyone. Although you can be put into operation, but this is the power system, which means that there are more chances of survival.
    3. If you are a patriot to the core or just a couch hero - read the article first.

    IMHO. If suddenly yes guests appear on this earth worse than Tatars (uninvited), then this is the end. For either the nuclear weapons are rumbling earlier, or the power has leaked everything and you are out of the game. Sheet-asphalt-cemetery.
    1. wanderer_032
      +1
      26 July 2014 12: 42
      Quote: erased
      If you missed or have nowhere to run - go to where there is at least some kind of power, no matter whose

      And if one of the parties has the task of mowing everyone to the root, also go?
      1. +3
        26 July 2014 13: 00
        Option with a sheet.
        1. wanderer_032
          +1
          26 July 2014 16: 25
          Quote: erased
          Option with a sheet.

          They will bury in it.
      2. -2
        26 July 2014 13: 05
        wanderer032-troll slowly umnyakovy warrior?
  15. +5
    26 July 2014 12: 29
    from the Don.
    Survived, damn it! But on the other hand, it is better to know and at least provide for something!
  16. Crang
    +2
    26 July 2014 12: 39
    Quote: erased
    IMHO. If suddenly yes guests appear on this earth worse than Tatars (uninvited), then this is the end. For either the nuclear weapons are rumbling earlier, or the power has leaked everything and you are out of the game. Sheet-asphalt-cemetery.

    Power does not control everything. There are also commanders of nuclear submarines with nuclear missiles on board, which lurk under the ice of the arctic ocean. They can say their weighty word without power.
  17. +14
    26 July 2014 12: 43
    Normal article. Yes, I read it some time ago on the net.
    Some things seem cynical, but they don't make them less useful. As for the family, the author writes that the first step is to protect it (".... the family is more important than the Motherland ...."). For if you are with your family - no maneuver, no freedom of action and you have something to lose: your family is your weak point. Is not it? I myself have a wife and two children - I would not want them to become an object of bargaining in the mess.
  18. wanderer_032
    +6
    26 July 2014 12: 46
    The article is sensible in general, but does not agree with some details with the author.
    But in principle, he talked about the fact that it contains the most severe scenarios, but this does not mean that everything can happen that way. People will still remain human beings and survive, and animals in human form will also remain animals and will also try to survive. To each his own.
    But isn't it better, as in V. Vysotsky's song "about the transmigration of souls", to be a decent person during his lifetime?
  19. +1
    26 July 2014 13: 24
    Interesting. It is written that the author is a former GRU employee, but according to the details of the descriptions of movements
    in a battle group, he seems to have fought along with some militants (partisans), and not in special forces.
    Some paragraphs completely copy instructions for the IDF junior commander, and some
    the specifics of the Russian (or Chechen?) army. I never guessed where he was.
    1. Turik
      0
      8 August 2014 16: 33
      Gru is the same intelligence!
  20. +11
    26 July 2014 13: 38
    This article is about SURVIVING !!! Just about how to stay alive! And that’s it! And whoever has some moral principles, such as someone else’s cannot be taken (even if he doesn’t need it), the author leaves out the brackets ... Personally, I liked it, the info will not be superfluous ...
    1. 0
      28 July 2014 12: 21
      The article is about "become a scumbag and you will survive", and they take someone else's, always deciding according to the situation and including using moral principles, normal people, and not scumbags!

      Yes, and it is clear who has what principles, so they like it ... especially like it, those for whom this article is the principle "in order to survive, you can become a scumbag" ...
  21. -1
    26 July 2014 13: 50
    I am not talking about the correctness of any practical advice in this article ...

    I’m talking about what this article is aimed at ...

    In short, the meaning, become a scumbag, and you will survive ... because the article is disgusting, directed against the Russian spirit ... in order to win, we must corrupt ...

    This was not the former GRUSHNIK who wrote, but ... I don't even know how to "call it", because ... in Chechnya, the people were at least "not ours", in fact an enemy, even if it was not even consciously an enemy, but under the influence of fooling. ..

    So there is a big difference, and you can’t compare a possible mess in Russia and in Chechnya!
  22. +10
    26 July 2014 13: 52
    I read the article, read the comments.
    1. And what if mom-dad is over 60 and sick? Throw to the mercy of fate?
    2. Judging by the personnel and information from the southeast, there was looting, but not in such quantity as the author scares us.
    3. If the booty you smell something ... Have we really forgotten what is needed first? Matches, salt, sugar, cereals, water (as much as you can stock up on). I live on the banks of the Volga + there are springs, for MSC and St. Petersburg water may be the currency, but not for the "Zamok".
  23. +2
    26 July 2014 14: 38
    An article about survival, what have moral principles to do with it? The information is helpful. It’s up to everyone to throw someone or not to throw.
    1. +1
      28 July 2014 11: 30
      Nichrome to myself ... moral principles and survival have nothing to do with ... you my friend are not a "good cat", but an "evil cat")))

      If militiamen with civilians in Slavyansk behaved this way, they would have lasted long ...

      Yes, and some of the tips smack frankly ... but what if they cheated as it should and after, like Kalash, let's say ... you are a corpse then right away - there are objections, write.
  24. +6
    26 July 2014 14: 58
    And here I have a number of questions.

    Why take a weapon if you are not going to use it? And if you apply it against whom? And why bargain him at the oporniks and checkpoints? Could it be that if you talk about weapons, you will immediately be declared a saboteur or a looter ?! Logically, if you're peaceful, why are you carrying weapons? Explain or I do not understand something.

    The author proposes to immediately make legs if people of one of the warring parties call to themselves. But the question arises, how to make legs on a wide, spacious street, square? After all, as soon as you run, I am more than sure you will get a queue afterwards. After all, we again draw attention to the logic, if you run away then you are afraid or are hiding something not good. Why should a peaceful man run away if he is peaceful? After all, if a policeman stops you, for example, and you just run away from him, naturally he will rush in pursuit. Consider the example from the movie "Watch Out for the Car". As a result, it turns out some kind of vicious circle, if you run, you will get a queue to catch up, if you come up, they can also shoot you. In this case, there is a chance to escape if the location is with narrow streets and dense buildings. Could someone please clarify this point for me.

    Why can't you use a helmet, after having painted it white and write "peaceful" in large letters? After all, the most important thing is the head, with wounds to other parts of the body you can still somehow live, but with a wounded head you can hardly live long. If only because she needs to think, but how can she think when she will split from pain ?! Since the head can fly from anywhere. And then he will immediately kill with a shrapnel in the head.

    As for refuge in monasteries, people are different, as are clergymen. And the author of them a priori inscribed in a number of cinnamon.

    And why on the list of things arafatka?

    In general, everything is correct in the article, I categorically do not agree to the account of the family as a burden.

    The multi-episode "Walking Dead", despite the fact that it is American, conveys the picture of survival in the city and the surrounding area quite well. Advice for viewing. :)
    1. wanderer_032
      +1
      26 July 2014 17: 05
      Quote: Roland
      And why on the list of things arafatka?


      So that the neck is not rubbed, and it can also be used as a mask against dust, and also as a hemostatic tourniquet or as a bandana.
      It does not have to be just "arafatka", you can use any piece of the same size, suitable for the density of the texture of the material (weight and ease of use). You also need to think about color.
      1. wanderer_032
        +2
        26 July 2014 17: 19
        As for random encounters with armed people, then the author is right, it is better to avoid them as much as possible.

        But such a situation can only happen to those people who live by the principle where the curve will lead (that is, they have an unconscious passive life position).
        Such behavior manifests itself in the fact that such people are little interested in events taking place not near them (for example, events taking place in a neighboring country, etc.). Their way of life is usually in a narrow circle of their personal very limited interests. Such as food, sleep, copulation, booze, smoke and ostentatious superiority by humiliating the weaker (including women and children) to the public, in affirming their social status.
        When it really comes to "fried", when it is necessary to really do the job, then they fall into a stupor (tough stupidity) and perish, their families perish with them.

        Those who don’t live like that go to the army or gather in partisan units and fight.
        Taking care of the family, of course, if it is really necessary.
        1. wanderer_032
          +5
          26 July 2014 17: 56
          I also want to add that most people have a very high opinion of themselves.
          Of course, such an element as upbringing is often present in this, this is manifested in the grinding from childhood that a person is the KING of NATURE, the dominant species, etc., such nonsense.
          Nonsense because the human species on the planet is not any "king of nature".
          Anyone who is alone with nature can die from a bacterial infection or a small insect bite, and even doctors will not save him (because they may not be near).
          Not to mention the collision with more serious dangers.
          There are no kings in this world, and that is all fun.
          Each type of living creature and the environment has its own advantages and disadvantages.
          Knowing this, you can avoid many dangers, not knowing most likely you will die. That's all.
          And knowledge about the world around you needs to be updated daily, otherwise nothing good in life awaits you.
    2. 0
      28 July 2014 11: 46
      And that "in general, everything is correct in the article"? It is possible in more detail, with specific arguments, why "all this is true" !!!

      For example, I did not like the article ... And "The Walking Dead" - well, maybe for you "mat_ras_ni_kov" this is true ... But it is not necessary to drag it into Russia ... of course, there is enough shit in Russia. But still, Russia, most of the peoples of Russia and the Russians are not Americans and Western Europeans - as you say you have "no body", but we have "not a soul")))))))))))))

      Yes, and why am I, here without any argument they write ... mutually))) - many tips are completely crap ...
  25. +4
    26 July 2014 16: 23
    Article plus ... from the city, however, I didn’t have to run ... I had to see how others were running ... as a rule, at first (and no one is ready !!!!, except for those who know in advance) complete panic and dizziness .... and also ... a soldier (state army) is believed and not afraid, in my opinion - it is so.
  26. 0
    26 July 2014 16: 42
    What make-up is more important than points?))
  27. -1
    26 July 2014 16: 49
    In the army, no one always really understands anything. Most of the officers are tyrants, and the number of moral monsters who are eager to fight will go off scale. And this is normal (more precisely, not normal, but normal).

    The article was negative only because of this phrase.
  28. +1
    26 July 2014 16: 59
    That is the problem, that families, the most defenseless element of society, will remain to die. Well, if the family has several men who can do something, but if only one, plus, for example, a teenage son. Then it remains only to pray. Alternatively, develop deeper plans for evacuation to rural areas, in which it will actually be easier to live. Although in general I liked the article. The foundation is correct.
  29. Simonov
    +8
    26 July 2014 18: 08
    Very correct ACADEMIC article. Gives help for improvisation in real situations, as a kaleidoscope of real situations can be very different.
    The essence of tactics of behavior with armed people - as in a collision with pack animals.
    On my own, I note that the article breaks down stereotypes - practically ALL the population assumes their behavior in crisis situations using Hollywood films. Where MANDATORY:
    A. the protagonist (GG) leaves the city in a big home car
    B. GG takes the whole family with him on the road (wife, two children, nigga neighbor)
    B. GG feeds and takes out medicines on the way, stealing roadside supermarkets
    GG rescue - meeting with US soldiers
    All this, as it turned out in practice - bullshit.
    And I also want to add an important idea - IN OUR CONDITIONS: Together with a group visit to the grocery store, you must visit the PHARMACY. Drugs and antibiotics in crisis situations are the currency. And drug addicts themselves hack into pharmacies already on the second or third day of emergency.
    1. Ignatius
      -1
      26 July 2014 19: 31
      Let it be correct in relation to B.D. on ter. The United States, when he voted for election changes, whatever they were, it was not for the opportunity to shoot better from the window of his apartment. What was the likelihood of the beginning of such events 30 years ago? 0.00%. I prefer to count only on the best army in the world, as my grandfathers did. They won the demoniac and the worst rulers.
  30. +3
    26 July 2014 18: 12
    If in the city it comes to the point that an ordinary civilian will have to "take" a cop in order to get a machine gun, then this civilian will definitely not survive, even if he does get this machine gun.
    1. wanderer_032
      0
      26 July 2014 18: 39
      Quote: kirsa
      If in the city it comes to the point that an ordinary civilian will have to "take" a cop in order to get a machine gun, then this civilian will definitely not survive, even if he does get this machine gun.


      There are also army depots and weapons stores, you can try your luck there ... laughing

      But to an ordinary civilian, a hunting rifle (preferably the most common caliber) or a smooth-bore rifle is much more preferable.
      Because the smoothbore has more advanced capabilities for survival (a more expanded assortment of ammunition and the ability to manually equip cartridges).
      And those who want to fight to arm themselves will not make much work, because the battle trunks will be littered like dirt (the biggest problem is ammunition), and the army or partisan units always need to be replenished.
    2. Simonov
      +3
      26 July 2014 18: 39
      "Take the cop" is not necessary. I think that the machines will be willingly sold "for their own". This is what drugs and antibiotics are for.
  31. Ignatius
    0
    26 July 2014 19: 22
    Professionally made provocation. Where is the author?
  32. +4
    26 July 2014 19: 31
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    The main idea - self-esteem (abbreviated ChSD) in the proposed circumstances - a deadly attavism. Do not amputate - do not survive

    Yes, cynicism does not hold the article. In principle, it is understandable that many ideals will have to be left in a mythical country. Where the state stands mountain for the people, and the people for the state. Where civil defense is established, and every citizen knows where to go and what to do, if that happens. In general, since we cannot build such a state, it means that the most realistic way out is to look at such articles. But self-esteem is still sometimes not a thing in itself, but a consequence of something more. Something higher than life. For example, in besieged Leningrad, cannibalism never took on a massive scale. People ate all sorts of rubbish, such as animal corpses buried six months ago. But they did not think of humanity, although human corpses - here they are, only snow picking. Compare now with all sorts of American books on survival, life there is above all. Well, I don’t know, as for me, there is always a certain threshold, it’s more expensive for me to step over it.
    Quote: ivanovbg
    In my opinion, only with 50 m. Of the landing rope and with 20 m. Paracord brute force.

    Anyway, the minimum toolbox is a knife and a rope. Two things that are very difficult to find a replacement in a difficult situation. Leave me only the knife and the rope, and I will provide myself with some kind of housing, make a fire and hunt for some food.
    1. baradec
      +2
      27 July 2014 01: 12
      and what threshold are you not ready to cross if it depends on it - will you die in the next day or not?
      1. 0
        27 July 2014 14: 35
        This is selected individually, in practice.
      2. +1
        27 July 2014 18: 17
        Quote: baradec
        if it depends

        man is mortal, but that would be half the trouble. The bad news is that he is sometimes suddenly mortal, that’s the trick! And in general he cannot say what he will do tonight.

        © Bulgakov, "Master and Margarita."
        hi
  33. +3
    26 July 2014 19: 56
    Just six months ago, many of us would have hardly paid attention to such an article, and now ...
    I don’t know what you liked or disliked the most in the article, but I liked the beginning of the article about options "A", "B" and "C" the most ... Whatever option "C" we have, everyone needs If something happens to normal men, they will join the action during option "B".
  34. slava777
    -3
    26 July 2014 20: 04
    Of course, the article is a minus: I didn’t say anything about cowards ...
    1. +1
      27 July 2014 23: 44
      Quote: slava777
      : I didn’t say anything about cowards ...

      IMHO, while the enemy is hovering over the question: "And what for he put on his panties on the boss" ???
      The dude has a chance to rush off, well, or the scope he has got a little laugh laughing laughing laughing
  35. +4
    26 July 2014 20: 10
    1. An offshore aristocracy (OA) is a narrow group of people who are formally considered “citizens of the Russian Federation”, and in fact are “non-residents,” since their capital, assets, property are located outside the country. OA is present in government, business, the media, the army and special services. An example of Ukraine shows that for the sake of preserving its assets abroad, an offshore aristocracy is ready to carry out any commands “from there”. Including the organization and financing of civil wars, coups, "anti-terrorist operations." Of course, we are far from the illusion that the local offshore aristocracy can finance all subversive work and all armed activity in Washington’s areas of interest. But it can also act as an intermediary, with the help of which it is convenient for Washington to carry out such financing. In particular, there is a suspicion that the Ukrainian oligarch Kolomoisky is not financing his militarized detachments created by him (thrown to suppress the DPR and LPR). This oligarch is just a “window” through which Washington’s money is transferred to private military structures. First, Washington transfers money to Kolomoisky’s offshore accounts, and then it goes to the oligarch’s accounts in Ukraine [1]. We have no confidence that Russia today has its own “Kolomoisky” who also receive money from Washington through their offshore structures and thus participate in subversive activities against Russia.

    2. Foreign capital within the country. Firstly, foreign companies and banks are an ideal wallet for financing any subversive actions within the country. Secondly, foreign companies and banks, on the command of the Financial International, can destabilize the economic, political and social situation in the country. It’s enough to recall such a “minor” case as blocking operations with plastic cards by Russian “daughters” of international corporations Visa and MasterCard. There is nothing surprising, since these corporations are closely connected with the American special services. There is no illusion that Western banks and companies in other sectors do not have such ties. In the West, a very rigid "power vertical" has long been built, about which our textbooks on the "market economy" are completely silent.

    3. Media that are funded from abroad or from domestic sources controlled by the West. Unfortunately, so far our authorities have not even begun a serious discussion of putting the media in Russian jurisdiction under effective control. Events in Ukraine were “highlighted” by these anti-Russian media, but they continue to operate.

    4. Part of a multi-million army of immigrants. Among them there are many people who arrived in Russia not only (and not so much) to earn money, but rather in order to carry out a special mission. Many of them have military training and are ready to take part in hostilities on command.

    5. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Even after the adoption of the law on foreign agents in the Russian Federation, many of the NGOs continue to remain foreign agents without declaring this. There are many financial schemes in order to circumvent the requirements of this law.

    http://poznavatelnoe.tv
    http://eafedorov.ru
    http://www.rusnod.ru
  36. +4
    26 July 2014 20: 10
    6. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) as a special extraterritorial entity controlled by the US Federal Reserve. The law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which at one time was developed not without the participation and influence of Western "experts", stipulates the special status of the Bank of Russia, which in fact makes it uncontrollable to the Russian state.

    7. Russian banks, which from this year come under direct administrative control by the US tax service (according to the American law FATKA [2]). They will even be officially called the "tax agents" of the United States. Any agent, including a “tax” one, is on a “short leash” with his “curator”. It is no longer necessary to say that as long as our banks make payments in dollars, they will remain on the “hook” of Washington, as all dollar transactions go through the US banking system. The last vivid example of Washington being closer to Moscow for Russian banks is the story of the “daughters” of Russian banks from Sberbank and VTB in Ukraine. They ended up in the group of those selected banks that Kiev ordered to place special bonds issued by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine to finance military operations in southeastern Ukraine.

    Of course, I name only the most important “heads” of the hydra under the name “fifth column”. There are others. They all hid. But they have not disappeared. Just look at the "offshore aristocracy." Despite constant calls to fight offshore, she has not disappeared. There is only a certain regrouping and relocation of its foreign assets. But assets still remain outside of Russia (with some exceptions). If we do not want our war to begin according to the Ukrainian scenario, we need to immediately begin work on neutralizing this multi-headed hydra. And it’s necessary to beat on all heads. Judging by indirect data, even on the agendas of our Security Council, the problem of the “fifth column” is only touched upon in passing. In the State Duma, judging by the names of the laws being prepared and adopted, this problem was not felt by the deputies. After a heated debate in the State Duma over NGOs funded from abroad, the enthusiasm of the elected representatives on the front of the fight against the “fifth column” has significantly diminished. To begin with, at least more attention should be paid to publications on the theme of the “fifth column” Today, this topic in our media, unfortunately, is marginal.

    http://eafedorov.ru
    http://www.rusnod.ru
    http://poznavatelnoe.tv
  37. +6
    26 July 2014 20: 24
    The article is a big plus. Firstly, it returns to reality. Secondly, it makes you think that you need to prepare for war. Even if there seems to be peace and prosperity. The first to fall are those who cannot digest the information. War is a complex of such information that demoralizes consciousness, but should be the other way around. By the way, responsibility for neighbors allows you not to relax and mobilize consciousness under rapidly changing circumstances.
  38. +2
    26 July 2014 20: 29
    I really liked! sent a link to an article of relatives in the Donbass
  39. -1
    26 July 2014 21: 11
    Infa from several sources. It is spiced with its ideology and its "values". Most likely, personal experience or not, or it is minimal.
    1. baradec
      +1
      27 July 2014 01: 22
      or among those who have gone through this and have real experience, the advice will be similar.
  40. +5
    26 July 2014 21: 17
    from the first com-that I see stubborn and not logically thinking minus players, I support the last one. + big author. The family should be sent right away, this is understandable now, but when, God forbid, it comes to this, you can slip through it. that's when these Soviets. I fully support the advice: deliver your "train" to the "place" yourself, and then decide how to live on!
  41. 0
    26 July 2014 22: 06
    For all the controversy of many points in the article, there are and there are a lot of reasonable.
  42. 0
    26 July 2014 22: 06
    There is a game called DAY Z. People survive after the zombie apocalypse. So on some servers "zombies" do not include ie. only "people". There and so such a massacre is going on, be healthy.
    1) Water
    2) Stew
    3) Cartridges
    4) Bandages - all life values.
    Stews are killed for a can. For ONE bandage. There are gangs. I saw a man, shoot!
    Try eating paid, there is free (upgrade Arma 2 OA).
    I think questions on the article will not arise at all.
    1. +1
      28 July 2014 07: 05
      Do you really value life by virtual toys ???
      1. 0
        29 July 2014 01: 44
        Do you really value life by virtual toys ???


        For example, I do not evaluate. But, unfortunately, living people play virtual toys. So there is a joke in every joke ...
    2. 0
      29 July 2014 01: 55
      Such games are another direction of psychological warfare: from childhood, "animal" behavioral stereotypes are formed and trained in people ... which can work out in life ...
      Would Leningrad have survived the blockade with such installations?

      And in real life it works for "divide and interrupt one by one"
      While historically the enemy was defeated together - and the game of Zarnitsa contributed to the training of self-organization
  43. -2
    26 July 2014 22: 29
    A guide for dummies, a list of equipment in general scream. It will be good for a start to get what any camouflage, shoes and a belt with pouches. Everything else without experience is an extra burden.
    1. baradec
      +4
      27 July 2014 01: 06
      in urban environments where it is not clear who you are, in camouflage you are the first target, especially for snipers. Firstly: since you are in camouflage, you are most likely fighting and posing a threat. Secondly: since you are in camouflage and most likely fighting, you have something to chew on (ammunition, weapons).
      1. -2
        27 July 2014 13: 00
        Ahahah)))
        in urban environments
        I myself am looking for someone to take off and get along with, thank God it’s not such a boob as some.
    2. +1
      28 July 2014 07: 14
      To wear camouflage during the database = sign the death sentence. That is why the press at the front wears civilian clothes and blue armor, although camouflage or khaki would seem safer. In fact, the most dangerous thing is to be mistaken for a fighter of the opposing side.
      1. 0
        28 July 2014 15: 28
        laughing So and so you are on the list of goals, do not think that you will be pitied, today you are here, and tomorrow already on the side where you are 99% likely to be questioned whether you should let go unhindered, that is the question).
  44. +2
    27 July 2014 00: 25
    - No one, even the sappers, are not engaged in the removal of mines and slaves. They stupidly undermine their TNT saber. Do not be clever and begin to shoot VU.

    We shot them from AK - SVD from a distance ...
  45. -1
    27 July 2014 00: 55
    So go give up? article clever, but hostile for some reason.
  46. aba
    +1
    27 July 2014 01: 36
    Quote: Yutas
    I have a wife and two children myself - I would not want them to become a bargain in a mess.

    Yes, when children appear, you clearly understand that you have moved from the tumbleweed section to a more static one.
  47. 0
    27 July 2014 03: 57
    The author did not write about what to do for women.
    And what should people who, by definition, cannot rob, do not need to pass by those who need help and leave the kitten meow in the closet (even one that may have been mined).
    It remains only to read Fadeev and build his ideal of behavior on THOSE books ...
    1. +1
      27 July 2014 13: 39
      Quote: elenagromova
      what to do to people

      Rope with a cat is not a super secret gadget _
  48. 0
    27 July 2014 10: 07
    Automatic, if you get hold of it - (ideally axu), fold the butt and hide it under the jacket. I advise you to remove the fuse on the machine immediately, it can be hard, you can get confused. The cartridge in the chamber, of course.

    Ready-to-shoot weapons hide under clothing for a long time and with active movement, falls, jerks, etc. Sooner or later, the trigger trouser still clings to the elements of clothing or equipment.
    Shoot your eggs! Well, or at least a shot to the knee.
  49. +4
    27 July 2014 13: 52
    Trigger Trigger))), if the weapon is not specially modified, it will never go down because the trigger force is ALWAYS more than the weight of the weapon. But if you have a stupid habit, constantly keep your finger on it, then surely, sooner or later, the fool bullet will find the target.
    Article plus for the idea, it is important that one way or another comes the understanding that in order to survive, you must try. For particularly emotional anti-cynics, I will say again, a foolish bullet. In war, living by civil rules and concepts is impossible; this luxury will not last very long.
    A couple of comments on the database. The author mentioned trajectory exceedance tables and daily cleaning, especially from the breech, this is correct. However, I would like to note that the tables are a thankless task to memorize, but to look at them during a battle, you yourself understand ... Therefore, it is enough to be able to work with three sight settings, aiming at one standard (for this setting) place on the "target", i.e. look at the table three times and more and more it is not needed. Well, about "cleaning every day", there should rather be recommendations on how to preserve weapons during intensive use without being able to do them properly. So, saliva, ash and kerosene, dehydrated (with salt), of course, that's what allows you to keep the barrel clean enough.
    1. 0
      30 July 2014 11: 33
      "However, I note that memorizing tables is a thankless task,
      and look into them during the battle, you know ...
      Therefore, it is enough to be able to work with three settings of the sight "///

      Tables ... - I was also embarrassed by this expert advice ... Even doubts crept in,
      Is this article a compilation from various sources?
      On the M-16, there are only two positions of the sight "normal" and "long range". And then I
      (and everyone else too) forgot to switch in a nervous atmosphere.
  50. ilioitaliano
    +2
    27 July 2014 22: 31
    Great article. Good practical advice on survival for civilians is presented in a war-flaming city ... And whoever says anything about the author’s cynicism, without some of these tips, a civilian in combat is a corpse !!!
  51. 0
    27 July 2014 23: 56
    The article is not indisputable, but in combination with other sources it is very useful. I threw it into the archives. There may always be a need, even in my boring UK. Suffice it to recall the events of three years ago - when a bunch of stoned idiots completely paralyzed life in the center of London for several days.
    Okay, now on a more cheerful note - what should be my actions if, while walking along Piccadilly, I come across a horde of succumbing Russian desnatures?
    1. wanderer_032
      +2
      28 July 2014 10: 58
      Quote: SlavaP
      Okay, now on a more cheerful note - what should be my actions if, while walking along Piccadilly, I come across a horde of succumbing Russian desnatures?


      Run, just run.
  52. +1
    28 July 2014 08: 39
    I read all the comments. Different opinions. But in light of recent events in the world (not only the Southeast), this may well become a reality. not today of course, but soon. It doesn’t matter what method you use to prepare for this. But you need to prepare. This of course does not mean that everything is bad and that's it, p...ts. But there must be readiness. It's better to overdo it.
    I'm really scared for my family. But in order to protect them, you need to at least understand how to do it.
    It’s chaotic, but the article was a continuation of my thoughts that arose a few days ago. I practiced my actions in case of this.
    "Peace to your home" V. Vysotsky
  53. +2
    28 July 2014 08: 43
    It seemed to me that the article was compiled from different sources. some kind of vinaigrette. “I advise you to remove the fuse on the machine immediately, it can be hard, you can get confused. The cartridge is in the chamber, of course.” and then “- Remember the weapon is always on safety.”
    the second part was published. the first one is about the apocalypse. although ideas may be needed. for basic military training, in a new interpretation.
  54. +1
    28 July 2014 11: 44
    The rightness of everyone is determined by life. One thing can be said: those who think that wars are fought according to peacetime rules are mistaken. The war follows its own rules. There are no small things. Nor does it happen what youngsters who have never been in combat imagine in their imaginations. In general, when you go to war, don’t think that you will survive, but think about how to get out of any situation alive.
  55. sensey
    0
    28 July 2014 12: 51
    The phrase about swearing at Mr. PU is confusing... an obvious fifth column injection, in general, the most reliable place in the event of war is the army.
    1. 0
      22 November 2014 00: 29
      And besides the phrase about PU... You didn’t find anything in the article???
  56. padonok.71
    0
    28 July 2014 12: 59
    The army is always the most reliable place. Anytime. And to all civilians - if you are so smart, why don’t you march in formation? wink
  57. 0
    28 July 2014 13: 44
    Quote: Rus86
    It seemed to me that the article was compiled from different sources. some kind of vinaigrette. “I advise you to remove the fuse on the machine immediately, it can be hard, you can get confused. The cartridge is in the chamber, of course.” and then “- Remember the weapon is always on safety.”
    the second part was published. the first one is about the apocalypse. although ideas may be needed. for basic military training, in a new interpretation.

    in the first case, this is when you walk alone and you will not meet anyone except enemies, and in the second case, when in a team (herd, flock) and while they are tormenting the last one (unlucky), you have time to prepare.
    1. +1
      28 July 2014 15: 48
      We had a chief of staff in our battalion. passed through Chechnya. among other things, he especially emphasized that there were no wounded in his unit due to careless handling of weapons (he carried out cerebral prophylaxis there). and my brother told me that he walked along the border, a border guard, a cartridge in the barrel, but the weapon was on safety. In general, the specialists are separate and the militia is on the other side.
  58. +1
    29 July 2014 09: 27
    the article is not special forces, but by definition a stalker, the advice is cynical, but vitally important, therefore it has its place, and therefore everyone chooses for themselves what is necessary and what is not and whether it is necessary at all, the price of which is their own life... soldier
  59. +2
    29 July 2014 12: 12
    According to the text, he lives in St. Petersburg, and Novgorod is in the east? This one will fight...
  60. 0
    31 July 2014 07: 29
    An article from Berkem’s website?)) At one time I read something similar. At home there are always cereals, stewed meat/dehydrated food, purchased water in five-liter bottles in storage. I constantly renew my reserves by eating the old ones. The main thing is that without fanaticism. And so that the people around you would know less about it. Otherwise they will laugh, but in difficult times they can remember and visit. If not themselves, then they will attract the guys for a small share. There are also questions about the “house in the village”. Peasants are smart dudes in life, but there you are always a stranger. So, if something happens, they will surround your mega-hole first. By the way, in the situation described by the author, I am the 200th without options, with my prosthesis. So if all this drags on for more than a week, after the first winter, at best, half the population of the cities will remain alive.
    1. 0
      31 July 2014 20: 04
      Quote: Zomanus
      After the first winter, at best, half the population of the cities will remain alive.

      However, you are an optimist, my friend, which half? And even after winter!
      Quote: Zomanus
      if all this drags on for more than a week, after the first winter

      Nice line .
      hi
  61. -1
    5 August 2014 20: 32
    Perhaps the article contains fragments of useful information; without this, no one would take it seriously at all.

    The most important, however, is the second, hidden semantic layer: to instill confidence that such events are possible in Russia. This is the main message of the article, and not a hodgepodge of hackneyed survival tips.

    Psychological pressure is put on the reader, under the guise of horror and concern for the family, in order to convince them that a civil war is possible in Russia. Complete, total chaos and destruction of the state is possible...

    At this point the author is caught in the act. Either these are his personal beliefs, which he unconsciously shares, or, what is much more dangerous, a conscious attempt at psychological infiltration.

    The article is false. In Russia, such a scenario is impossible for various reasons, the simplest: proof from the opposite - if the events described began to occur (St. Petersburg, Moscow in complete chaos), this simply means that the “Dead Hand” will soon work and such a scenario will cease to be useful to anyone whatever it was.

    Therefore, the article does not set itself the goal of investing a small amount of force in its implementation; it is simply an example of undermining self-confidence, an attempt to corrode the inner core of the nation. It may be microscopic, but how many are there? So many.

    In the Second World War, this was done with the help of leaflets that were seeded in the area; now similar “leaflets” with much more sophisticated, “beyond-text” messages are seeded in national segments of the Internet.
    Be carefull. It's not just bullets that kill.
    1. 0
      22 November 2014 00: 34
      Nowadays, similar events are possible all over the world. in my opinion, the author simply gives real advice on survival for both yourself and, if possible, saving your family and friends. And I don’t see any hidden meanings, only specific advice.
    2. 0
      22 November 2014 00: 36
      didn’t finish writing))) ... no matter where you are, in Russia, or anywhere else in the world...
    3. Khaln
      0
      21 December 2014 16: 34
      Perhaps such things happen, but it is important to take away something useful from this article. As for psychological treatment, this has been going on for centuries. Remember the Germans who wrote our Russian history, again the subtext is that we are such a stupid people that in order to govern us wisely (we ourselves are not able to?!) we invited some foreigners (allegedly) Rurikovich, they say, come and rule us...
  62. +1
    6 August 2014 01: 06
    In Russian there is no “I will win”, there is “we will win”. The article simply talks about being a special forces soldier in reconnaissance and sabotage operations. If you're out of breath after 100 meters or can't do at least one pull-up, it still won't help you.
  63. 0
    6 August 2014 09: 51
    Quote: dEADj
    The article simply talks about being a special forces soldier in reconnaissance and sabotage operations.

    Don’t say that _ It’s not funny, I was far from it myself, but I crossed paths with the guys, it doesn’t even come close to reflecting it. God forbid that you, if RDG wishes, do not see her.
  64. Odin3489
    0
    11 August 2014 13: 40
    Is it just me or is there a "KORD" machine gun in the background of the third photo?
    1. non_inc
      0
      18 August 2014 02: 05
      You're already sick of it, you lousy experts. Do you really care. There are planes, ships, tanks, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, machine guns, machine guns, grenade launchers and pistols. You don’t need to know anything else, because all this bullshit kills. Just KILLS. What difference does it make what the path is there? Kord, dshk, kpv or something else? It’s interesting - look on Google and there’s no point in showing off. Some fucking experts.
  65. 0
    23 August 2014 22: 08
    A good article, but the preliminary preparation for the BZ (big ass) is poorly reflected.
  66. +2
    1 September 2014 01: 03
    Let me write it straight: all the people who wrote “article plus” are the ones who will be expended first of all.

    There are two reasons for this. Firstly, if you start behaving like looters, looking for guns in police departments and doing other “cynical things to survive”, you will be regarded as looters, a potentially dangerous element/bandits (why do you need weapons?) and slag, the result will most likely lead to additional holes.

    Secondly, since the article resonates with you, it means you a) have no real experience, no analytical skills, and a small outlook; b) consumer psychology; c) disbelief in organized resistance. This means that you will act like an inexperienced loner with a "grab what's wrong" instinct, which will quickly lead to additional holes. Cooperative behavior increases the chances of success, which is why armies, states, and societies exist.

    Or with such a psychology you will end up in a gang that will sooner or later be shot. Don't you hope that there will be eternal chaos in the territory where you live? Neither the old nor the new hypothetical authorities have given up on such entities. This is a consumable item.
    1. 0
      1 September 2014 18: 44
      Quote: Mentat
      Let me write it straight: all the people who wrote “article plus” are the ones who will be expended first of all.

      I’m interested in who your comment is for, I’m more than sure _ They unsubscribed. laughing
      Quote: Mentat
      Don't you hope that there will be eternal chaos in the territory where you live? Neither the old nor the new hypothetical authorities have given up on such entities. This is a consumable item.

      Let's not go into the problems of forming states on the ruins of civilization.
      By the way, we noticed that recently there has been a fairly organized attack on our state, its viability is being questioned.
      Some people thought _
    2. 0
      22 November 2014 00: 46
      Sorry, but that's all. What kind of government are you talking about at the start of the civil war??? just everyone will form either into gangs, or for themselves, or into corporate structures (cops with cops, etc.). anyone who hopes for some kind of power and protection will be shot in the very first hours. If, of course, you are an expert in the science of survival, with real experience, analysis and a broad outlook, confirm your point of view. And in my opinion, the advice is correct.
  67. 0
    15 September 2014 21: 51
    Thanks to the author for sharing a vital experience!
  68. 0
    21 November 2014 23: 54
    Hello everybody! I'm new here))), but I agree with the author of the article 100%. He gives, in my opinion, real advice on survival in the conditions of the beginning civil war. and regarding those who disagree with his article, I think that among those who read and comment on VO there are people who have experience of survival, so maybe ask their opinion whether the author is right or not?
  69. 0
    22 November 2014 09: 51
    Quote: StanSS
    tips for survival in the conditions of a beginning civil war.

    Mmmm, where does it start?
    If you are talking about Ukraine, then it is in full swing there and you can ask the people who are there.
    hi
  70. 0
    30 November 2014 18: 51
    I agree with the author!
  71. The comment was deleted.
  72. Atameken
    0
    17 February 2015 19: 07
    strange, here GRUshnik is on another site Latvian political strategist, publicist and native resident of Riga Jurgis Liepnieks wrote the same thing
    .The article is exactly the same. Who wrote it?
  73. 0
    11 March 2015 16: 03
    Quote: AlNikolaich
    Good informative article. God grant knowledge gleaned from it
    never needed ...
  74. ignorant
    0
    29 June 2015 07: 16
    In general, according to your mind, you should have a “house in the village”, in which in the underground there is a cache of stewed meat, canned food, water, medicine, etc., where you should retreat.
    a house in the village is not the best option, because in villages, towns, villages, military personnel can be stationed, and then together with them you can be bombed or shelled. If you decide to become a loner, then it is better to go into the forest, into the taiga, dig a dugout and wait out the whole boil there .
  75. 0
    30 June 2015 19: 31
    – Be prepared, mentally, to “work off” the civilians who exposed you. Including women and children
    ALL dude, that's it. Are you walking through the forest with such valuables? Have you played with any toys or are you from Western Ukraine?
  76. 0
    23 August 2015 14: 02
    I don’t know who wrote it... It looks like a guy from the GSN. At the same time, I somehow want to believe this man. At the gut level. The most interesting thing is that I remembered everything very quickly. Especially “how to get out of town.” A very useful article, in my opinion. Although, if you have brains, all this is understandable. One of my acquaintances says, “A friend is a person who, answering a phone call at two in the morning, does not ask why you are asking him to urgently bring several 10-liter garbage bags...”. Well, I answer, I would definitely ask. :(((And I would start calling my loved ones, well, like “how are they.” True, I’m an orphan and not married, but! I would definitely call my friends. Does this seem like a “fatal” mistake in general, in the conditions of an urban battle? In any case, thank you I sincerely feel sorry for those who think that this will never affect them. :(((
  77. 0
    27 November 2015 11: 24
    Conflicting feelings about the article. Having fragmentary experience, I can say that not all information is perceived as good. Getting a Kalash in a riot depends on the degree of “agility” and the presence of combat experience (or experience in “squeezing property”, which is not far from military affairs). Personally, I prefer not to disturb the demons of the past and refuse weapons, although I am quite competent in handling them, including explosives. The experience of walking in neutral on the last Maidan convinced me of the desirable absence of visible weapons, and indeed weapons in general. Anika the warrior does not need it, and for someone who has sufficient experience, selecting what is already available will not be a Herculean task. But the issue of moving in the conditions of rebellious horror in winter (the author assumes that this is the Moscow region) seems to me to have not been finalized. Cold makes the human body dull and weak (I served in Yakutia, so I don’t know about frost from Google). Personally, in my opinion, I have finalized the situation of saving a family group, because for me this is the greatest value and all dictators, countries and regimes and terrorists (separatists too) in the list of priorities are lost at the end of the list. I myself specialize in using plants in extreme conditions based on my life, which is far from a salon life.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"