Military Review
Sign In Register

New upgrade T-64

119


You can pay attention to the new design of on-board screens, installation of remote sensing, smoke grenade launchers. The gunner saved a rangefinder sight 1-X42. In general, it remains SUO1A33. For a not very demanding customer, for example from Africa - more than enough.

In general, it is possible to note a good cover of the frontal projection of the DZ, incl. and attention to the protection of the onboard projection (power screens protect the sides to the MTO).


Towers tanks T-64B1 before modernization.




Originator:
http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
119 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Good cat
    Good cat 24 July 2014 09: 43
    +4
    Who is upgrading that? Ukrainians?
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 24 July 2014 09: 45
      +12
      Quote: Good cat
      Who is upgrading that? Ukrainians?

      Well, who else?
      1. enot73
        enot73 24 July 2014 09: 48
        +11
        Rather, just tuning, not upgrading. Mow under the T-90.
        1. avdkrd
          avdkrd 24 July 2014 11: 20
          +14
          Quote: enot73
          Rather, just tuning, not upgrading. Mow under the T-90

          In terms of improving the remote sensing, not tuning at all. Visually, it was done much more thoroughly, than on the modernization of the T4, indeed the DZ is closer to the T72AM - we would have such "tuning" for all the T90 and T72 - they would not have had a price. Of course, in the case of the T90, without upgrading the LMS, improving the crew's awareness, improving the mobility and reliability of the chassis, the main disadvantages of the T64 have not been fixed.
        2. neri73-r
          neri73-r 24 July 2014 13: 02
          +1
          And in my opinion, they mow under a carrot from Israel, especially from the front projection (tower).
          1. Tyumen
            Tyumen 24 July 2014 21: 09
            +2
            Quote: neri73-r
            mow under a carrot from Israel,

            And what's wrong with that? Merkava is protected as it should.
        3. tehnoluks
          tehnoluks 24 July 2014 23: 04
          +3
          Rather, just tuning, not upgrading. Mow under the T-90

          It would be better under the Priora
      2. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 24 July 2014 13: 28
        +4
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Good cat
        Who is upgrading that? Ukrainians?

        Well, who else?


        Photoshop can still.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 24 July 2014 13: 53
          +6
          Quote: Geisenberg
          Photoshop can still.

          He still can not, for example, upgrade the Su-25 to version F-22.
    2. Cormorants
      Cormorants 24 July 2014 09: 46
      +6
      The tank is certainly handsome!
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 24 July 2014 09: 58
        +18
        Quote: Cormorants
        The tank is certainly handsome!



        But I agree with the author
        Quote: ...
        For a not very demanding customer, for example from Africa - more than enough.
        In the photo, the Ukrainian T-64 shelled under Slavic from small arms and disabled.
      2. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 24 July 2014 13: 03
        +4
        Quote: Cormorants
        The tank is certainly handsome!

        The tank was successful (unlike the T-62), but it is already half a century old, it will still be pulled into the arsenal of third world countries, but it’s already a bit old for modern conflicts ... although there is nothing to choose dill from, the west is arming them only in words.
        1. Andrew 447
          Andrew 447 24 July 2014 15: 55
          +4
          In order to draw such conclusions, you need to have experience operating the T62 / 64. I’m practically sure that you don’t have it. Do not be offended, but your post is, to put it mildly, not competent.
        2. Bad_gr
          Bad_gr 24 July 2014 17: 43
          +5
          Quote: And Us Rat
          The tank was successful (unlike the T-62), ...

          This, based on what facts did you draw such conclusions?
          T-62 was operated and fought in almost 30 countries of the world. And the T-64 never traveled beyond the territory of the USSR. You can, of course, refer to secrecy, but now what prevents them from trading? All attempts of Ukraine to sell it at least somewhere have the same result - no one needs such a tank.
          1. svp67
            svp67 24 July 2014 20: 57
            +4
            Quote: Bad_gr
            And the T-64 never traveled beyond the territory of the USSR.
            hi
            Not accuracy - he was leaving ... and if we omit the fact that the Soviet FOREIGN groups of troops were armed with them, then it is worth remembering that some of them were delivered by Ukraine to Africa ...
            1. Bad_gr
              Bad_gr 24 July 2014 21: 03
              +3
              Quote: svp67
              Not accuracy - he was leaving ... and if we omit the fact that the Soviet FOREIGN groups of troops were armed with them, ....

              Here, yes, I made a mistake: our group of forces, in the GDR, were in service for some time, then they were changed to T-80.
              Quote: svp67
              it is worth remembering that some of them were delivered by Ukraine to Africa ...

              But eb did not hear that. Is there a link to the details of this transaction?
          2. avdkrd
            avdkrd 25 July 2014 01: 06
            +1
            how did t64 leave the territory of the USSR? Until 87, it was the main tank in the ZGV, before the T80 arrived. Even in 1990 there were shelves with t64.
        3. avdkrd
          avdkrd 25 July 2014 00: 58
          +1
          Quote: And Us Rat
          The tank was successful (unlike the T-62), but it is already half a century old, it will still be pulled into the arsenal of third world countries, but it’s already a bit old for modern conflicts ... although there is nothing to choose dill from, the west is arming them only in words.

          And what did the T62 not please? The T62 is essentially a deep modernization of the T55. Conceptually the same 55, but with a number of fundamental technological improvements. Nothing revolutionary, but definitely not an unsuccessful tank. T64 - revolutionary for its time, but with a bunch of flaws that are even too difficult to fix. The tank was created without a modernization reserve, or rather, this reserve has long been selected (unlike the T72). In general, it is possible to improve protection, SLA, but there’s no getting away from the suspension (the shit of the T64 is rated for 39 tons, but now it’s less than 49) and the engine can be changed very rarely - the installation volume of the opposition is very small, it’s easier to create a new tank than MTO redo.
    3. Veter
      Veter 24 July 2014 09: 46
      +8
      Quote: Good cat
      Who is upgrading that? Ukrainians?

      Same question. Not an article, but a newspaper article. If you expand the topic, it would be great.
    4. net abortion
      net abortion 24 July 2014 10: 10
      +23
      Who is modernizing the Ukrainians? laughing fellow what
      1. ia-ai00
        ia-ai00 24 July 2014 11: 39
        +4
        Well, it still looks nothing!
        And the horse is still on its feet, and the half-zap-horn is painted.
        I saw a photo from Romania, so there, on the top of the chaise, the car body was stuck, rusty, rumpled, you can't find one in a landfill, and a poor donkey, pulls this "technique", can barely stand.
    5. sub307
      sub307 24 July 2014 10: 47
      +1
      Ukrainians. Information taken from Ukrainian http://www.mil.in.ua/
    6. Vik.Tor
      Vik.Tor 24 July 2014 11: 14
      +2
      Acromy there is nobody to them, only the end of this modernization I think is all one, defeat, dump, scrap.
    7. Interface
      Interface 24 July 2014 11: 23
      +6
      For a not very demanding customer, for example from Africa - more than enough.


      Thin banter! laughing
    8. abc_02
      abc_02 24 July 2014 20: 43
      +3
      A new modification of the T-64 tank is being tested in Ukraine

      In Ukraine, work is underway to further modernize the main battle tank T-64BV-1, which is in service with the ground forces. Photos of the new version of the tank appeared on the Internet, which significantly differs from the version of the upgrade to the level of "Bulat". Presumably the new tanks are intended for a foreign customer.

      You can pay attention to the new design of the side screens, the installation of dynamic protection units, launchers of smoke grenades. The gunner retained the 1G42 rangefinder sight. In general, SUO1A33 remains. For a not very demanding customer, for example from Africa - more than enough. In general, we can note a good cover of the frontal projection of the DZ, including as well as attention to the protection of the side projection (power screens protect the sides to the MTO).

      Earlier it was reported that Ukroboronservis signed a contract with a foreign customer for the overhaul and delivery of 50 main battle tanks T-64BV-1. The work will be carried out at the SE “Kharkov Armored Plant”.

      The signed contract is a serious step by the concern to bring this type of tank to the global arms markets. The T-64 is considered a strategic breakthrough tank and has not yet been delivered abroad. According to the criterion of “price-quality”, as well as a number of tactical and technical characteristics, such as firepower, security, patency, this tank exceeds the T-72, and with the elements of deep modernization - and the version of the T-4BM “Bulat”. According to government analysts, the start of export of the modernized T-64 opens a new page in the history of the State Concern. ”

      Because until recently, the discussion in Ukraine continued that the export of the T-64 would narrow the maneuver for promoting the Ukrainian Oplot and T-72 tanks. But now it was decided that the modernized T-64 with a new dynamic protection, a new engine, a new fire control system could be the best option for those customers who would consider Oplot an overly expensive tank.

      According to Ukroboronservis, after signing a contract for the repair and supply of 50 T-64BV-1 tanks, production volumes of the Kharkov Armored Plant will increase by almost 100 million UAH.


      Sergey Berzov based on andrei-bt.livejournal.com
  2. Giant thought
    Giant thought 24 July 2014 09: 44
    +3
    The difference in tower defense is felt immediately. But the future will show how she will behave in a combat situation.
    1. Panikovsky
      Panikovsky 24 July 2014 10: 14
      +4
      the future will not show anything in Russia; the last t-64s are being withdrawn from service after running out of resources. The article is not relevant.
    2. yushch
      yushch 24 July 2014 11: 21
      +4
      Quote: Giant thought
      The difference in tower defense is felt immediately. But the future will show how she will behave in a combat situation.


      I’m certainly not special in tanks, but it seems to me that the angle of inclination of the DZ tower is simply an ideal guide for hitting a tank under the tower.
      1. Petergut
        Petergut 24 July 2014 12: 05
        +8
        Quote: yushch


        I’m certainly not special in tanks, but it seems to me that the angle of inclination of the DZ tower is simply an ideal guide for hitting a tank under the tower.


        It only seems.
        The shape of the DZ of modern Russian tanks, indeed, resembles the "lure" of the tank turret of the WWII era, from which the shell could ricochet into the thin upper sheet of the tank hull. However, it only reminds.
        Modern DZ is not an armored element of a tower from which a shell can ricochet, but is a certain structure, absolutely unarmored, with a small explosive charge and designed to destroy a cumulative jet.
        In the case of the use of non-cumulative ammunition, such as sub-caliber, the DZ practically does not create obstacles, and the main armor of the tank comes into effect, usually combined.
        Briefly. hi
      2. sabakina
        sabakina 24 July 2014 12: 48
        +4
        They got ahead of me. I wanted to say that after the Second World War they got rid of the so-called "zamanah" under the tower, first they removed it from the front, then from the back (documentary film "Armor of Russia). And then there is one continuous" zaman "...
      3. avdkrd
        avdkrd 25 July 2014 01: 07
        0
        Quote: yushch
        I’m certainly not special in tanks, but it seems to me that the angle of inclination of the DZ tower is simply an ideal guide for hitting a tank under the tower.

        Yes, my friend - not special))) From DZ, by definition, a rebound is impossible, unless 5.45 ....
    3. sergkar
      sergkar 24 July 2014 14: 35
      +3
      Yesterday there was an article about the modernized T-72, so there are solid holes on the tower in the DZ (apparently, solid protection = this is an option). Here, at least it's all in the basic configuration. Well, at least in the photo. Yes, and the protection of the sides, there is much better. At ours, from a board the log for self-extraction hangs. In short, our done, if only otё..alsya.
      1. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 24 July 2014 17: 49
        0
        Quote: sergkar
        Here, at least it's all in the basic configuration.

        No doubt, the design is prettier. But on the combat qualities - the question. There is a photo where on the burnt T-64 from DZ some fastenings remained. Detonated everything.
        1. Tyumen
          Tyumen 24 July 2014 21: 14
          0
          And the tank burned down, it is not known from what hit and what. DZ may have done its job.
          1. Bad_gr
            Bad_gr 24 July 2014 23: 43
            0
            Quote: Tyumen
            DZ may have done its job.

            So, only one box (into which Kuma got into) was supposed to work out of the DZ, and the rest were supposed to continue to protect each of its sections. And they seemed to have fallen for the company with the first box and the tank remained naked.
      2. avdkrd
        avdkrd 25 July 2014 01: 15
        -1
        Quote: sergkar
        Yesterday there was an article about the modernized T-72, so there are solid holes on the tower in the DZ (apparently, solid protection = this is an option). Here, at least it's all in the basic configuration. Well, at least in the photo. Yes, and the protection of the sides, there is much better. At ours, from a board the log for self-extraction hangs. In short, our done, if only otё..alsya.

        After the modernization of the T72, the main advantage in comparison with the T64 is the FCS, the engine with automatic transmission, situational awareness of the crew, navigation, etc. Clear. that the Relic that is placed on the T72 looks full of holes and apparently really gives way to this Outskirts option. True, no one bothers to bring DZ on all Russian tanks to the T90 am variant, it is simply expensive and it is not a fact that the "budget" version of Relic is radically worse than its elite counterpart. I would like, of course, that the modernization of Russian tanks was unified with the T90s, but in real life it is expensive.
        As for the "basic" configuration on the t64 - nothing will be gained simply by strengthening the armor due to the more advanced DZ. Without replacing the MSA t64, it is blind as a mole and requires external target designation. which implies serious military coordination and professionalism in command and control.
        Another point - DZ Knife from an independent knife has not yet confirmed its effectiveness. at least Bulat burn for one or two.
  3. Evgeny_Lev
    Evgeny_Lev 24 July 2014 09: 45
    0
    Is it Ukrainian modernization?
  4. Mooh
    Mooh 24 July 2014 09: 46
    +21
    An extremely informative article, it is immediately clear who upgraded what, why. Maybe it was just photos that needed to be published, but the people would figure out the comments themselves?
  5. Altona
    Altona 24 July 2014 09: 48
    +2
    The men will burn this panzermachine at the ATO and they will do the right thing ... soldier
  6. Evgeny_Lev
    Evgeny_Lev 24 July 2014 09: 48
    +1
    It would be nice to know in which year the photos were taken?


    It seems that someone decided to rehabilitate the Ukrainian military-industrial complex, after such significant recent articles)))
    1. Altona
      Altona 24 July 2014 09: 57
      +4
      Quote: Evgeny_Lev
      It seems that someone decided to rehabilitate the Ukrainian military-industrial complex, after such significant recent articles)))

      --------------------------------
      I am still impressed by the "armored" UAZs and Batars with mezzanines for stretchers ... hi
      1. Evgeny_Lev
        Evgeny_Lev 24 July 2014 10: 10
        +11
        Yeah, today, too, tossed and turned for a long time, I could not fall asleep ... I kept wondering why we always lag behind the advanced technical ideas of Ukrainian engineers ??

        It's so simple, bulletproof armor made of reinforcement with a step of 5 mm and everything is visible and safe in a click !! Ingeniously

        And professional sheets for booking boards !!! ?? Now I know that if, God forbid, that, then our factory for the production of metal can rivet armored cars from civilian jeeps every day. Strategic however enterprise!
        1. Yun Klob
          Yun Klob 24 July 2014 11: 34
          +3
          Give me the armor mesh Rabitsa!
        2. Bad_gr
          Bad_gr 24 July 2014 17: 53
          +2
          Quote: Evgeny_Lev
          It's so simple, bulletproof armor made of reinforcement with a step of 5 mm and everything is visible and safe in a click !! Ingeniously

          Moreover, from an interview with the designer, this device protects against machine gun bullets. It is unclear why ours with cermets and titanium bother if iron provides a similar protection for the fence. No.
      2. RBLip
        RBLip 24 July 2014 11: 20
        +7
        Quote: Altona
        I am still impressed by the "armored" UAZs and Batars with mezzanines for stretchers ...

        yeah the holy mykola and UAZ are still that prodigy ...
  7. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 24 July 2014 09: 49
    +3
    Ukrainian modernization, we will spend our time with such an old age, with such success it is possible to modernize the T-34.
    1. skylare
      skylare 24 July 2014 10: 01
      +3
      But what, have we completely got rid of this junk and switched to modern tanks? Oh, I doubt something.
  8. Same lech
    Same lech 24 July 2014 09: 50
    +2
    Who is upgrading that? Ukrainians?


    Something the militia of NEW RUSSIA these modernized tanks burn no worse than the Nazi TIGERS.

    Only in battle can you verify the effectiveness of such upgrades.

    The war in NEW RUSSIA perfectly shows the strengths and weaknesses of tanks, attack aircraft and helicopters ....

    however, they all burn for a sweet soul very well from ordinary portable devices (RPGs, NEEDLES, CORNETS, BASSES and more)
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 24 July 2014 13: 06
      +5
      They burn because the wrong military conducts the wrong hostilities, from where the wrong honey is obtained.
      A real battle is the interaction of all types and structures of troops, from the assault unit to the rear, including the kitchen and toilet (not to be confused with the toilet).
  9. smershxnumx
    smershxnumx 24 July 2014 09: 50
    +3
    It looks beautiful! And what about armor penetration? If the protection is improved, how much?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 24 July 2014 09: 53
      +8
      Quote: smerx24
      And what about armor penetration?

      Then he will tell the shooters.
      1. GRAY
        GRAY 24 July 2014 10: 16
        +4
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Then he will tell the shooters.

        And it will show.

        A burnt-out T-64BM "Bulat" tank from the 1st separate tank brigade of the Ukrainian army near Lugansk. 14.07.2014 (c) Dominique Faget / AFP
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 24 July 2014 10: 37
          +7
          Quote: GRAY
          A burnt-out T-64BM "Bulat" tank from the 1st separate tank brigade of the Ukrainian army near Lugansk. 14.07.2014

          Glory to Ukraine good
        2. Alekseev
          Alekseev 24 July 2014 10: 50
          +26
          Quote: GRAY
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Then he will tell the shooters.
          And it will show.

          The T-64 is easily incapacitated during careless operation, although modernized, though not.
          It would be necessary to spread business proposals among the Ukrotankists, they say, carefully, but strongly, disable the equipment, you will not go into battle, you will save life!
          If you stupidly set fire to a tank and run away, you'll be a saboteur, shooting on the spot, etc.
          And so, he poured a simple vodka, harder, into the cooling system, gave it ... - here you have the engine failure due to overheating.
          Oiled the air, gave it a ... - here's the engine failure due to dust wear.
          Better yet, a couple of liters of oil on the bottom of the MTO, they say a little leaked, discharge PPO cylinders. The panzer will burn without any Strelkova! wink
          And without danger to the life of the crew.
          put a piece of pebble in the gun before firing, they say, accidentally flew in - the gun must be changed. Yes
          The shell was loaded incorrectly - the lever of the Ministry of Health was bent, it was always in short supply, there were enough untrained fools at all times.
          While the repair, back and forth, the war may end ...
          Etc. the notion of such a legion.
          1. jovanni
            jovanni 24 July 2014 11: 25
            +5
            Good operating recommendations! They would somehow be distributed among ukrovoyak ... Well, maybe leaflets in the form of letters of happiness - I read and saved myself, let me read a colleague ...
            1. Black Colonel
              Black Colonel 24 July 2014 18: 08
              +1
              Place these instructions on the "Censor". And more than once. The result will not be long in coming.
          2. Severbob
            Severbob 24 July 2014 14: 34
            0
            this is an IDEA - to deprive all technology and war of the end
          3. Aleks tv
            Aleks tv 24 July 2014 15: 28
            +3
            Quote: Alekseev
            Etc. the notion of such a legion.

            Lesh, I just yelled while reading.
            Well, just a professional saboteur.
            laughing
            good
          4. Andrew 447
            Andrew 447 24 July 2014 16: 03
            0
            In vain you are so, you are angry, you need to love technology, just spilled 2-3 liters of oil on the radiator and that’s it.
        3. gandalf
          gandalf 24 July 2014 10: 57
          +8
          Here I see the best modernization of T-64 UrcoArmies: wink
          1. Black Colonel
            Black Colonel 24 July 2014 18: 09
            0
            You won’t immediately think that this is military equipment.
        4. RBLip
          RBLip 24 July 2014 11: 32
          +1
          Quote: GRAY
          And it will show.

          Well, why this photo? here recently Kars quite authoritatively proved that the tank burned out as a result of self-arson. the fighters of great Ukraine after they shot everything on their quilted jackets up to the peas and pearl barley decided to set fire to this pepelats so that it would not go to the damned Maskalsky hirelings. After all, all dill-patriots have long understood that only Ukraine produces the best tanks and ZAZ vehicles in the world. and it can’t be affected by the fire of some colorades. and in general it’s photoshop. wink
          1. Kars
            Kars 24 July 2014 12: 23
            +5
            Well, before that, the tank was hit by a minimum of 3-4 rockets or grenades - and so the 1 brigade has been fighting for more than a month and so far only one confirmed tank has been destroyed.
            1. RBLip
              RBLip 24 July 2014 12: 40
              +1
              Quote: Kars
              Well, before that, the tank was hit by a minimum of 3-4 rockets or grenades - and so the 1 brigade has been fighting for more than a month and so far only one confirmed tank has been destroyed.

              that is, there are no questions about peas and ZAZ?
              1. Kars
                Kars 24 July 2014 13: 25
                +3
                Quote: RBLip
                that is, there are no questions about peas and ZAZ?

                This is not within the scope of my interests. But the objective information on the use of tanks is interesting to me. Any lie would be honest.
                1. Ramzaj99
                  Ramzaj99 24 July 2014 17: 17
                  0
                  Wow-ho ..... this is what turned him around so ..... some rollers remained .....
            2. Andrew 447
              Andrew 447 24 July 2014 16: 08
              +2
              Is this a joke about 3-4 rockets or grenades ???If he received this bouquet, his tower from the detonation of BC lay a couple of tens of meters away. This beat him with a Grad. You need to know the weather forecast and not travel to dangerous places.
              1. Kars
                Kars 24 July 2014 18: 49
                +2
                Quote: Andrey 447
                Is this a joke about 3-4 rockets or grenades ???

                no
                Quote: Andrey 447
                ? If he received this bouquet, his tower from the detonation of BC was lying a couple of tens of meters

                why don’t the tank have armor? why dynamic protection? with some luck there are tanks that received 16-17 anti-tank rocket-propelled munitions and didn’t drive much.
                Quote: Andrey 447
                .This beat him with a hail.

                not like hail.
          2. Kazanec
            Kazanec 24 July 2014 12: 30
            +1
            And all who posted this photo provocateurs :)))))
            1. RBLip
              RBLip 24 July 2014 12: 41
              +2
              Quote: Kazanets
              all posted this photo provocateurs :)))))

              on gilyaku us, padded jackets))))
  10. volot-voin
    volot-voin 24 July 2014 09: 52
    +7
    It is necessary to deliver such tanks to Strelkov. Kaklov has just a lot of T-64s; we can say that they didn’t deliver it. Type restored from the details of the damaged tanks.
    1. Alekseev
      Alekseev 24 July 2014 10: 21
      +3
      Quote: volot-voin
      It is necessary to deliver such tanks to Strelkov. Kaklov just has a lot of T-64

      Well, that reminded.
      Not that no one would have thought of doing so ..
      But for Strelkov, the main problem is not tanks, they will be delivered (almost 2000 T-64s in the Russian Federation at storage bases), but tankers. As well as infantrymen, artillerymen, sappers from the Donbass population.
      1. Tyumen
        Tyumen 24 July 2014 21: 18
        0
        Quote: Alekseev
        As well as infantrymen, artillerymen, sappers from the Donbass population.

        In general, people are required, and they themselves will get the equipment. Or the heroes of Ukraine will sell.
  11. Prometey
    Prometey 24 July 2014 09: 54
    +1
    Or maybe it's eighty? feel
  12. 75 hammer
    75 hammer 24 July 2014 09: 57
    +7
    There is a certain limit to modernization, with the t-64, t-72 this limit has already arrived, in the near future new products will be released worldwide.
    USA must be destroyed !!!
  13. Bombardier
    Bombardier 24 July 2014 09: 58
    +1
    What was it? Why such articles from three lines? request
    1. enot73
      enot73 24 July 2014 10: 09
      +1
      Quote: Bombardier
      What was it? Why such articles from three lines?

      So to tell - there is nothing special.
  14. VSZMK
    VSZMK 24 July 2014 10: 03
    +4
    And what about the IS-3, which without rustling made a rustle?
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 24 July 2014 13: 11
      +2
      I am joining! Who knows what the IS-3 is? angry
  15. dark_flame
    dark_flame 24 July 2014 10: 06
    +1
    How not to upgrade the T-64 is already obsolete.
  16. aristarh
    aristarh 24 July 2014 10: 09
    +1
    I had personal experience in the 90s trying to tune the Cossacks to regret with a Porsche; he did not have to find funds for a normal car.
  17. igor1981
    igor1981 24 July 2014 10: 10
    0
    T-64 how not to modernize it is not even yesterday, but already yesterday
    1. Vik.Tor
      Vik.Tor 24 July 2014 11: 22
      -1
      Bulat did not show himself against the civilian population, they are preparing a new killer modernization, a new "wunderwaffle"
  18. igor1981
    igor1981 24 July 2014 10: 14
    +1
    is it still Ukrainian tanks. unclear
    1. family tree
      family tree 24 July 2014 11: 19
      +5
      Quote: igor1981
      is it still Ukrainian tanks. unclear

      T-64, the brainchild of the Kharkov Design Bureau of Heavy Engineering. Kharkov plant them. Malyshev, after the collapse of the USSR, went to Ukraine and became the main competitor of UVZ in the field of tanker T-64 vs N-72. Since then, this srach did not stop and calmed down only with the beginning of hostilities in Ukraine, when it turned out that 64 were burning in "skillful" hands, just like everyone else (before that, except for Bendery, they were nowhere). The author of the article, A. Tarasenko, a singer of Ukrainian tanks, is an analogue of Khlopotov, who glorifies Russian ones. Thanks to both of them, they supply the lion's share of information on tank building in the Soviet and post-Soviet space what and forced to break the head over this information, all of their info requires a very critical approach laughing
      Well: http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/ Tarasenko
      http://gurkhan.blogspot.ru/ Hassle hi
      1. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 24 July 2014 18: 05
        +1
        Quote: perepilka
        Kharkov plant them. Malysheva, after the collapse of the USSR, he left Ukraine and became the main competitor of UVZ in the field of the tank crew T-64 vs N-72 ....

        If you look at the quantity of equipment sold by these plants, then the word competitor is hardly suitable here.
        Kharkov did not sell a single T-64 abroad.
        The T-84, created on the basis of the St. Petersburg T-80, was more or less commercial success only once (Pakistani contract).
        But basically, the rival of UVZ was the T-72 tank, released at UVZ, but remaining in Ukraine for various reasons, and sold by Ukraine abroad at dumping prices.
        1. family tree
          family tree 24 July 2014 19: 54
          +1
          Quote: Bad_gr
          If you look at the quantity of equipment sold by these plants, then the word competitor is hardly suitable here.

          and became the main competitor of UVZ in the field of tank cover T-64 vs T-72
          Yes
          1. Bad_gr
            Bad_gr 24 July 2014 20: 00
            0
            Quote: perepilka
            and became the main competitor of UVZ in the field of T-64 vs T-72 tank
            Yes

            smile Well, perhaps in this.
  19. slavik_gross
    slavik_gross 24 July 2014 10: 18
    0
    I did not understand why to put pluses to an article to a campaign wrote Klitschko in a point ???
  20. IGMIT
    IGMIT 24 July 2014 10: 22
    -1
    Even the modernized one is 90 years behind the T-10.
  21. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 24 July 2014 10: 23
    0
    And why are civilian crews pictured?
  22. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 24 July 2014 10: 32
    +3
    This is what modernization understands .. from one kind of militia, they are obliged to scatter after dropping their weapons ... and yelling Glory to Ukraine! bully
    The side protection is made of an airfield coating, which will not provide any adequate protection against small arms.
    The forehead was protected by reinforcement, the windows had ridiculous nets that could not even protect against bricks.
    1. Echo
      Echo 24 July 2014 10: 39
      +3
      Bggg ... an embryonic Bandera carrier, however. But Kaklov does not want to drive cars?
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 24 July 2014 10: 42
      +8
      Quote: MIKHAN
      from airfield cover,

      This is called mounted armor! And die of fear! lol
      1. jovanni
        jovanni 24 July 2014 11: 29
        +2
        From airfield cover, because carts for airmobile troops!
        1. lis-ik
          lis-ik 24 July 2014 13: 45
          0
          From the airfield cover because there will be no aircraft left soon, you don’t have to think about airfields.
    3. rf xnumx
      rf xnumx 24 July 2014 11: 18
      +7
      Quote: MIKHAN
      This is what modernization understands .. from one kind of militia, they are obliged to scatter after dropping their weapons ... and yelling Glory to Ukraine!

      The armored car of Lenin was even cooler
    4. Kazanec
      Kazanec 24 July 2014 12: 33
      0
      What the hell is this ?! :) but they couldn’t come up with aesthetics? :) what can he protect from? Or will the appearance of the militias be scared away ?! :)
    5. SSeT
      SSeT 24 July 2014 15: 05
      0
      Cool banderovozka! Why!
  23. Alexey Prikazchikov
    Alexey Prikazchikov 24 July 2014 10: 44
    0
    Armor protection is more literate than ours.
  24. Serega125
    Serega125 24 July 2014 11: 00
    +3
    We will soon see the T-34B1.
  25. bender8282
    bender8282 24 July 2014 11: 05
    0
    this tank has exhausted its resource, this "tuning" in fact only slightly refined its appearance!
  26. T80UM1
    T80UM1 24 July 2014 11: 13
    +1
    By 64

    The tower remained cast. fillers have not changed
    DZ knife 1/2? Prefer relic
    Running old, it would be better to put the running t-80/84 is the best of the Soviet
    The dviglo remains the same, which eats a lot of oil
    No thermal imager
    It looks like a modernization of the T-72 AGV, in principle, not bad
    1. Sailor
      Sailor 24 July 2014 13: 02
      +4
      Yes, I generally think that eighty is the swan song of our tank industry.
  27. Magic archer
    Magic archer 24 July 2014 11: 18
    +1
    The most annoying is that we gave them a lot of equipment ourselves! A friend told me. I saw how the same t-64 didn’t take away the tractors on the tractors. And now they podshamanil and in the battle against the militias negative
  28. Vik.Tor
    Vik.Tor 24 July 2014 11: 19
    0
    For the countries of Africa, the most

    What kind of Africa, they themselves already will die the old Soviet tanks are collected, to protect the independence, and all Africa fool
    1. family tree
      family tree 24 July 2014 11: 38
      +1
      Quote: Vik.Tor
      What an Africa

      However, at the end of last year, Ukraine was ordered to 50 T-64BV1, already from the Democratic Republic of the Congo
      1. siege
        siege 24 July 2014 12: 35
        0
        Amazon :)
      2. STALGRAD76
        STALGRAD76 24 July 2014 12: 45
        0
        This is instead of a girl’s brooch accessories laughing , and confidence in communication and protection against inadequacies laughing
      3. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 24 July 2014 23: 40
        0
        Quote: perepilka
        an order was made for 50 T-64BV1, already from the Democratic Republic of the Congo ...

        Of course, the wheels are added charm to this lady, but the chest, in my opinion, is not enough. I wouldn’t have sold such a machine, not like a tank ...
  29. Michael_59
    Michael_59 24 July 2014 11: 29
    0
    Omitting political issues, I will say that this modernization makes a more pleasant impression than the T-72B3 ...

    Armor protection is more reasonably executed, excluding VLD.
  30. Cristall
    Cristall 24 July 2014 11: 37
    +3
    Well, UAZs and mykols are so (although mykols are not so bad)
    A little better
    So the KRAZ plant has already manufactured several units of armored vehicles, code-named "Spartan" and "Kuga", which have already been sent to the ATO zone. Spartan is based on the Ford F550.

    licensed by the Canadian company Streit Group.

    1. siege
      siege 24 July 2014 12: 53
      0
      What about RPGs? Something they sing a lot, in the war zone ..... well, well.
    2. Papakiko
      Papakiko 24 July 2014 16: 01
      +2
      Quote: Cristall
      "Spartan" and "Kuga", which are already sent to the ATO zone. Spartan is based on the Ford F550.

      With special joy, I saw a creation from "KRAZ" as a dismantler of automotive equipment.
      Frameless brushes on the front, Continental tires, xenon in the headlights, LEDs in all understudy, dviglo and a box-dream of every fan of "Bigfoot" and mud mixer.
      And the dream of any sadist is "forged and stamped" wheel rims with 1001 bolts (studs) good
      Maybe there are leather sofas and "firm" acoustics in it?
      In general, data "waffles" in the Armed Forces of Ukraine will not be delayed.
  31. netwalker
    netwalker 24 July 2014 12: 06
    +1
    but what kind of modernization is this - "yard tuning" for dill
  32. Wolka
    Wolka 24 July 2014 12: 25
    +1
    and weakly launch this device for tank biathlon, here we will see it in all its glory ... bully
  33. Sailor
    Sailor 24 July 2014 12: 47
    +1
    It looks good, is clearly protected better than our T-90A.
    1. Evgeny_Lev
      Evgeny_Lev 24 July 2014 13: 28
      0
      What method of determination?

      How many PSUs were shot?
  34. sabakina
    sabakina 24 July 2014 12: 52
    +2
    The shape of the DZ of modern Russian tanks, indeed, resembles the "lure" of the tank turret of the WWII era, from which the shell could ricochet into the thin upper sheet of the tank hull.

    And here is the top case of the case? In this case, the shell ricocheted into a rotary mechanism!
  35. hellriker
    hellriker 24 July 2014 13: 02
    0
    It is clear against whom these 64 matches will fight.
  36. Leshka
    Leshka 24 July 2014 13: 04
    +2
    probably burns well lol
  37. evgenij1840
    evgenij1840 24 July 2014 13: 53
    +1
    It would be interesting to compare the T-64 dill with our at least modernized T-72 in real combat. I’m not talking about the T-90SM ... We need to fit a couple of militias in the Donbass wassat Oh, it would not be bad.
  38. TELEMARK
    TELEMARK 24 July 2014 15: 10
    +1
    Friends, I'm from the Far East, with comments a little later, of course, a tank of dill: you can't wash the oil on the transmission and just cassettes, and the T-72 is better and "64" won't start without a heater and the starting speed is high and this fucking two-stroke engine, BUT ... anyway! "64" is a kind of tank, but the TANK IS A TANK, I would give a lot to see this modification, even knocked out, better whole, I dealt with "64". although "BV", Hello tankers!
  39. GHOST29RUS
    GHOST29RUS 24 July 2014 15: 32
    +1
    The T-64 is already too old for upgrades, but the T-72 can still be upgraded smile
  40. Major Yurik
    Major Yurik 24 July 2014 17: 07
    +2
    Rummaging through his memory, he found ..... ITAR TASS message, yesterday the Chinese Army’s modernized tanks attacked the peacefully plowing Soviet tractor! The tractor returned fire from all of its 40 guns, smoked a curtain and turned on the afterburner and disappeared into the clouds. The Soviet government warns if this happens again - the harvester will enter the field!
  41. Eltempo23rus
    Eltempo23rus 24 July 2014 17: 45
    0
    The militias at least a dozen such tanks, another.
  42. Berezin alex
    Berezin alex 24 July 2014 19: 36
    0
    It is a pity that Russia is giving up the T-80U, an excellent tank. Dill on its basis were able to create very good T-84U and BM "Oplot", and the T-64 is already outdated and has exhausted its resource.
    The new craft of the Uralvagonzavod T-72B3 also does not inspire confidence: the old engine, unsuccessful and outdated DZ, poor ergonomics, and disgusting workmanship. We need a modernization of the T-72, which will make the tank close in efficiency to the T-90A, and it’s better to transfer the remaining T-64 to the militia of New Russia
  43. wild_boar
    wild_boar 24 July 2014 22: 05
    +1
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/572/daqu82.jpg
  44. wild_boar
    wild_boar 26 July 2014 12: 50
    0
    "... a robust man modified for urban conditions - a long-awaited increase in combat power ..." - a quote from the Ukrainian press. The flight of creativity in the tactics of using tanks continues. sad

    Everything is in the past, some photos from the old release, but maybe someone will be interested in terms of history
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/675/hefw124.jpg
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/719/bbkr857.jpg
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/013/nczw284.jpg
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/580/gniq332.jpg
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/605/voxk330.jpg
  45. wild_boar
    wild_boar 26 July 2014 12: 52
    0
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/057/ckkc45.jpg
  46. wild_boar
    wild_boar 26 July 2014 12: 52
    0
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/674/fdtw913.jpg
  47. wild_boar
    wild_boar 26 July 2014 12: 54
    0
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/405/ebwz482.jpg
  48. wild_boar
    wild_boar 26 July 2014 12: 56
    0
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/159/hxbu709.jpg