NATO is a tool of US state terrorism

.
(post-scriptum on the footsteps of the telecast on the Moldavian television channel Public TV).

The issues of terrorism over the past 20 years have become a concern for government policies in many countries.


In my opinion in Europe there are two authors who most succinctly answered the question of what terrorism is. These are Professor Dmitry Olshansky (Russia) and Professor Gabriel Dulea (Romania). In their works, they give the reader a clear idea of ​​the classification of terrorism. I, in turn, will add a new definition state terrorism superpowers. So who carries the palm in this kind of terrorism? As you guessed it - the United States and NATO.
And if the number of victims of individual terrorist organizations per year is about 1000 people per year, then the official figures below are terrifying.
"US antiterrorist operation" with 2001, brought to mankind At least 225 thousand people died and cost 3,7 trillion dollars. According to the most cautious estimates, the number of direct victims of these wars was 225 thousands of dead and 365 thousands of wounded, ”the researchers said.
The highest price was paid by the civilian population - 172 thousands of victims (125 thousands of Iraqis, 56 thousands of Pakistanis and 12 thousands of Afghans). The number of dead militants ranges from 20 to 51 thousands. That is, the proportion of civilian casualties is 76%.
The military losses of the United States amounted to six thousand people, their allies - 1,2 thousands, Iraq - 9,9 thousands, Pakistan - 3,5 thousands, Afghan losses - 8,8 thousands. Private security firms have lost thousands of their employees to 2,3.
US wars claimed the lives of 168 journalists and 266 humanitarian workers.
The result of the “war against terrorism” was the emergence of more than 7,8 million refugees.
In total, in the period 1945-2000. The United States, NATO’s main financial donor, has participated in more than 100 military conflicts that claimed the lives of about 20 million people. The most bloody is the Korean War, which brought 3.68 million victims.
Imagine, hypothetically, what the NATO budget is, if over the past two years it has declined by 45 billions of dollars due to the economic crisis. This amount is comparable in size to the German defense budget. The 3,7 trillion dollars figure includes not only military budget expenditures, additional costs of fighting terrorism and protecting the US territory and other expenses.
As we see from these figures, the “counter-terrorist operation” of the United States and NATO has nothing in common with the fight against terrorism and, in fact, is a huge investment of money with the oligarchic capital of the United States camouflaged by this operation.
Before conducting backstage and secret negotiations, Moldovan politicians and the now ruling Alliance for European Integration should look at these figures and decide for themselves the moral and ethical side of this issue. And all sorts of “centers of influence”, leading to fooling the population on this issue, cover it modestly, quietly, without fuss. Leave the Moldovan people alone, because they are this very people much more moral than their corrupt rulers. In confirmation of this, I will cite the following arguments.

Promotion of the interests of NATO in the political field of Moldova.

The first consultations of the Republic of Moldova with the North Atlantic Alliance took place after the adoption of the 20 Declaration of Independence on December 1991 and after 1992 are clearly anti-Russian emphasis on the background of the Transnistrian conflict.
6 January 1994 at the highest level of the North Atlantic Alliance reviewed the American Partnership for Peace initiative, and the President of the Republic of Moldova expressed a personal interest in this. 6 March 1994 in Brussels The President of the Republic of Moldova and the NATO Secretary General signed the Partnership for Peace agreement. In order to coordinate more effective NATO activities 16 December 1997, the NATO mission in the Republic of Moldova was established.
In 1999, the project to create an information network of the Academy of Sciences with NATO was completed with the financial support of the Polytechnic Information Network. Polytechnic University of Moldova received financial support from the Alliance. In June, with the support of NATO, the RENAM Association was established with educational and informational objectives. Thus, the researchers from Moldova not only received scholarships in Italy, Canada and other countries, but also any scientific discoveries became controlled by the United States. The visit of President V. Voronin to NATO Headquarters 28 June 2001 was the next step in the signing of a new Memorandum with NATO in the field of technical support and logistic cooperation. At 2002, at the intergovernmental level, a decision was made on the deployment of the US Center for Military Intelligence (NSA) in the territory of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Moldova. From this point on, not only the Armed Forces, but also the country's political leadership falls under technical and doctrinal dependence on the United States. October 3 The 2007 of the year in Chisinau hosted the opening ceremony of the NATO Information and Documentation Center. The Moldova-NATO Partnership Action Plan provides for the reform of the entire security and defense system of the country based on NATO principles and the conversion of the National Army of Moldova before 2010 to the standards of the North Atlantic Alliance. 2010 - Moldova hands over a database of its population to Romania to a NATO member. 2011 - under the guise of a cadastral project in Moldova, a triangulation network of GPS antennas is deployed, which is essentially a correction zone for American Tomahawk missiles - the direction of eastern countries. 2011 - Moldova receives an invitation from the Council of Europe to enter a single European airspace, that is, in essence, an invitation to the anti-missile shield Diviselou (Romania - NATO). Thus, from 1994 to 2011, such centers of influence as the Soros Foundation, the McCain Foundation, the NATO Documentation Center in Chisinau, the Marshal Center, the CE Information Center conducted the first successful stage - consolidating the territory and creating agents of influence in Moldova’s political, economic and scientific field. . The second stage involves the creation of regional (regional centers of influence), which can last 2-4 of the year. The third and final stage, before joining NATO, is a constitutional reform (the abolition of neutrality status) and a referendum. European participation in NATO activities

European
NATO members

Joint defense planning

Number of main headquarters

Level of engagement

Infrastructure support level

Providing forces for nuclear operations weapons

Belgium

involved

1

brigade

normal

involved

Bulgaria

involved

brigade

normal

United Kingdom

involved

3

division

tall

involved

Hungary

involved

brigade

normal

Germany

involved

7

corps

tall

involved

Greece

involved

1

division

normal

involved

Denmark

involved

division

normal

Iceland

no sun

normal

Spain

involved

1

brigade

tall

Italy

involved

4

corps

normal

involved

Latvia

involved

company

normal

Lithuania

involved

company

normal

Luxembourg

involved

1

battalion

normal

Netherlands

involved

1

division

tall

involved

Norway

involved

division

normal

Poland

involved

brigade

normal

Portugal

involved

1

brigade

tall

Slovak Republic

involved

brigade

normal

Romania

involved

brigade

normal

Slovenia

involved

battalion

normal

Turkey

involved

2

division

normal

involved

France

coordinates

1

normal

The Czech Republic

involved

brigade

normal

Estonia

involved

company

normal

What costs do European countries incur in connection with NATO membership?

The costs of NATO member countries are determined by the principle of "fair share" of participation. It is defined as the share of a country's GDP in the total GDP of NATO countries. The proportions are rarely accurate, but any strong deviation from the "nominal" can be a problem for NATO, since the United States has a law according to which annual funds to support the activities of the Alliance are allocated only after the Pentagon submits calculations of compliance of the Allies' contribution to the "fair share" of participation.
Contributions to NATO budgets are calculated according to agreed cost-sharing formulas and represent only a small portion of the defense budgets of NATO countries. The volume of the total budgets of NATO is about $ 1,5 billion per year. There are three of them - the civilian budget, the military budget and the security investment program.
The Citizens Budget covers the current expenses of the NATO Headquarters International Secretariat, civilian programs and activities, construction, operating and maintenance costs of various facilities, such as conference facilities, used for meetings of committees and working groups.
The military budget covers the costs of operation and maintenance of the combined military infrastructure, including the Military Committee, the International Military Headquarters and related agencies, the two main commands, as well as the associated command, management and information systems, agencies dealing with scientific issues research, development, procurement and logistics, AWACS forces.
The Security Investment Program finances the construction and operation of facilities and facilities required by NATO in addition to those built for the purpose of ensuring national security by individual Member States, such as information and communication systems, radar stations, headquarters, airfields, fuel lines, warehouses, ports and navigation facilities.
These budgets are monitored by the Military and Civilian Budget Committees and the Infrastructure Committee. Implementation of the guidelines for joint military funding is under the control of the General Resources Council. Each of the member states is represented in these bodies. All NATO budgets are also under external control.
The mandatory costs of NATO should also include the expenses of countries to conduct joint military operations, although these amounts do not relate to general budgets and are allocated mainly on the principle of “everyone pays for himself”. At the same time, in many cases economically stronger countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, provide financial assistance to others for their military operations.

European expenses arising from NATO membership as of 2002.

NATO members

Contribution to NATO budgets, million

Share in total budget,%

Costs of multinational operations, million

Share in total costs,%

Belgium

48,9

3,5%

15,45

1,0%

Bulgaria

0,0%

United Kingdom

200,2

14,3%

127,26

8,1%

Hungary

9,8

0,7%

0,91

0,1%

Germany

268,6

19,1%

186,06

11,9%

Greece

10

0,7%

13,72

0,9%

Denmark

34,8

2,5%

14,00

0,9%

Iceland

0,3

0,0%

0,0%

Spain

51,3

3,7%

78,86

5,0%

Italy

103,6

7,4%

83,64

5,3%

Latvia

0,0%

Lithuania

0,0%

Luxembourg

1,9

0,1%

1,44

0,1%

Netherlands

52,1

3,7%

36,71

2,3%

Norway

27,8

2,0%

12,09

0,8%

Poland

37,4

2,7%

0,0

0,0%

Portugal

7,4

0,5%

21,63

1,4%

Slovak Republic

0,0%

Romania

0,0%

Slovenia

0,0%

Turkey

19,6

1,4%

3,04

0,2%

France

111,8

8,0%

251,56

16,1%

The Czech Republic

13,6

1,0%

1,04

0,1%

Estonia

0,0%

USA

340,9

24,3%

669,51

42,8%

Canada

64,9

4,6%

47,08

3,0%

Total

1404,9

100%

1564,0

100%

What kind of military operations is NATO doing?
Bosnia and Herzegovina. Under the UN mandate after the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords in December 1995, NATO launched a multinational Implementation Force (IFOR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which monitored the implementation of the military aspects of the peace agreement. The IFOR mission was to stop the fighting and disunite the conflicting parties, who represented the newly formed administrative-territorial units of a split war country: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska, as well as ensuring the transfer of the occupied territories between them. For one year, the IFOR forces completed their task, and in December 1996 of the year they were replaced by a smaller Stabilization Force (SFOR).
With the improvement of the situation, the international military presence in the region is gradually decreasing. At the beginning of the 2004, the SFOR numbered nearly 7 thousands of soldiers, which is several times smaller than the initial contingent of 60 thousands, and indicates the progress achieved by Bosnia and Herzegovina. Now, by mutual agreement, the reduced SFOR contingent has been transferred to the EU administration.
Kosovo. In 1998, the armed conflict in the Yugoslav province of Kosovo, populated predominantly by ethnic Albanians, turned more than 300 thousands of people into refugees. The Yugoslav leadership ignored numerous international demands to withdraw the Serbian forces and begin negotiations with the Albanian population. In October 1998, NATO warned that if the Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic failed to comply with the demands of the international community, military force would be used against his regime. President Milosevic agreed to perform an ultimatum. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has deployed observers in Kosovo. For its part, NATO organized aerial surveillance and deployed special forces in Macedonia.
At the beginning of 1999, a new outbreak of violence began. Persistent attempts by international diplomacy to resolve the conflict were defeated, and in March the observer mission was evacuated. Soon, NATO launched an air campaign targeting specific targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. After the 78 day of air strikes, the Milosevic regime agreed to comply with international NATO and EU requirements.
As a result of the signing of the Military Technical Agreement between the commanders of NATO and the armed forces of Yugoslavia, and in accordance with the UN mandate, the NATO forces KFOR were deployed in Kosovo. Their task was to prevent the resumption of hostilities, create a safe environment, demilitarize the Kosovo Liberation Army, support international humanitarian activities and the work of the UN mission. Initially, KFOR forces numbered thousands of people up to 43. As a result of the gradual reduction, the contingent has almost halved - to approximately 24 000. KFOR included formations from most of the NATO countries, 15 partner countries, as well as Argentina, Morocco and New Zealand.
South Serbia. At the beginning of 2001, NATO, the European Union and the OSCE developed a strategy for the peaceful settlement of the armed conflict in southern Serbia, which threatened stability in the region. Unrest began at the end of 2000 in the Presevo Valley, where a large ethnic Albanian community was under the direct rule of the Serbs and had limited political and social rights. Ethnic Albanian militants armed with small arms carried out a series of attacks on Serbian security forces in the border security zone - a five-kilometer buffer sector along Kosovo’s internal border with Serbia. This section of the territory, in which the Yugoslav army had no access, was under the control of NATO forces KFOR.
Macedonia. In 2001, NATO launched a mission to resolve the crisis situation in Macedonia at the request of its government. Internal unrest in this country began in the spring of 2001, when ethnic Albanian armed groups came out against the authorities. NATO condemned the rebel attacks and tightened control on the border with Kosovo. At the same time, the Alliance demanded that the government of the country carry out constitutional reforms aimed at solving the problems that caused the discontent of ethnic Albanians. A key role in this process was played by the NATO Secretary General.
NATO agreed to meet the official request of Macedonia to provide military assistance for the demilitarization of the so-called National Liberation Army, which consisted of ethnic Albanians. The condition for providing such assistance was a cease-fire and the signing of a plan for the peaceful settlement of the conflict. After the start of the implementation of the Framework Plan for Reconciliation, NATO sent a contingent of 3,5 thousands to Macedonia to carry out a mission to disarm ethnic Albanian rebels. Since December 2003, thanks to the success achieved in stabilizing the situation, the military mission was terminated and replaced by the EU police mission.
Afghanistan. 11 August 2003 NATO assumed responsibility for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan to provide assistance to the Transitional Government of this country in providing security in Kabul and surrounding territories.
The International Security Assistance Force has been operating under a UN mandate since the end of 2001. The first mission of ISAF, which was carried out by forces of different countries, mainly NATO members, was led by the United Kingdom. It was replaced by Turkey, then Germany and the Netherlands. In October 2003, in accordance with a UN Security Council resolution, ISAF’s mandate was expanded. NATO agreed to expand its mission in Afghanistan, in particular through the temporary deployment of units outside Kabul and the assumption of military command of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (GWP). NATO pledged to maintain its presence in the country for as long as necessary.
Other NATO operations, including in Iraq, Sudan, and Operation Active Endeavor in the Mediterranean, are officially “non-military in nature.” ??????????????

It should be clear to the Moldovan people that they are trying to implant a foreign body, such as NATO, by caesarean section.

according to Agence France-Press, citing a study published by Brown University. US military operations.

Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Stavr
    Stavr 6 July 2011 14: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The alignment of the analyst is accurate, but it is usually not intended for the broad masses. There is diplomacy for this. Today, without a twitch, we can already speak boldly about American fascism, into which the foreign policy of deceit, direct and undisguised lies, aggression and intervention of the armed forces of Uncle Sam has degenerated. Why is there only one Hague tribunal condemning the innocent: pure farce! Today, decency masks from this person are ripped off, except that the hat still, with the symbol of the American dollar on it, remains. In the usual language of political correctness, this will only mean that he (Uncle Sam) is rapidly gaining the weight of the world Gendarme, but to be called an American fascist !? - God forbid! Where have you seen in at least one media to characterize today's American politics so rudely (but precisely).
    And yet, a simple layman should understand: the battle for world resources has begun, and this is a war, therefore, all the masks are ripped off!
  2. Rico1977
    Rico1977 6 July 2011 15: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Who would have thought opened our eyes
  3. datur 6 July 2011 15: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    NATO is an instrument of US state terrorism-- who would doubt it. only our liberoids for obvious reasons yes our favorite nano-ipodmen.
  4. Nikalai
    Nikalai 6 July 2011 16: 38 New
    • -4
    • 0
    -4
    It should be clear to the Moldovan people that there are still screened Cossacks in the Moldavian Army. Here he is Nikolay Parchevsky.
  5. Nicolai
    Nicolai 6 July 2011 16: 46 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    The disident writes about the news of the Russian probably not enough pension. Give him money, he holds you. Asking his grandfather what NATO is, he answered, "This is a terrible NATO word." Well, comrade Parchevsky writes the same thing. Good luck
    1. His
      His 7 July 2011 21: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Russian language learn gypsies
  6. Parchevsky Nikolay
    Parchevsky Nikolay 7 July 2011 00: 05 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    “Compliments” to me indicate that the article has reached its goal. Thanks to the commentators.
  7. Nicolae
    Nicolae 7 July 2011 09: 26 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    The article reached idiots. Only -removed- thinks about what NATO is doing without knowing what it is. Well comrade Nicolae, in the Moldovan army you could not even pass a psychological test and everyone laughs. Yes, yes, Parchevsky does not pass on the parameters of the psychological test. A YOU Military Review We hired a patient. Good luck, "only the sick can understand the patient."
  8. Parchevsky Nikolay
    Parchevsky Nikolay 7 July 2011 18: 29 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Indeed, Mr. "Nikolai" the article came to idiots. I wish you success and thank you for the attention you give to my publications.
  9. Toma alistar
    Toma alistar 7 July 2011 18: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Domnule Parcevschii, intrebarea mea este urmatoarea. Imi puteti da sursa de unde ati luat cifrele indicate in prima parte a comentariului Dumneavoastra? Va multumesc.
  10. mitrich
    mitrich 7 July 2011 18: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Mr. Lieutenant Colonel Nikolai Parchevsky!
    In vain you are offended by users. Firstly, the problems of Moldova from the Russians are far, so it was in the days of the USSR, and now too.
    Secondly, if you CAREFULLY read your article, then it is not an author's article, but a "hodgepodge". In the upper part you brand the USA and NATO, and in the lower part everything seems to be normal. Most likely, you put it together in blocks of articles of various ideological orientations. A couple of words, and of course I added on my own!
    The people see this and disdain you.
    Take an example from A. Samsonov. Although the author is controversial, he says what he thinks in his own words.
  11. Ivan35
    Ivan35 7 July 2011 20: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Mr. Lieutenant Colonel Nikolai Parchevsky!

    indeed at the end you have a NATO text - you just have to carefully edit it in the future
    But still you are ours! Write more
  12. Parchevsky Nikolay
    Parchevsky Nikolay 7 July 2011 22: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Pentru Toma Alistar
    Cifrele sunt luate de pe pagina oficiala NATO, iar alte surse sunt indicate la sfirsitul articolulului.
  13. Parchevsky Nikolay
    Parchevsky Nikolay 7 July 2011 22: 48 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    For Ivan 35, Mitrich and Toma Alistar.
    I did not set myself the goal of writing an author’s article. The goal is to remind NATO apologists of what normal people have long known. Unfortunately in our country even such figures are news for the majority of the population. The NATO Documentation Center in Chisinau is on the path to fooling the population and hiding these numbers from the people. This article is a direct response to the NATO Center in Chisinau on a television broadcast. Let them know that people will not be fooled. Sources of the article are the official website of NATO and Agence France-Press, citing a study published by Brown University. But I am glad to have such heated discussions around this topic relevant for Moldova.
    1. Marat
      Marat 7 July 2011 22: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I support you. I join Ivan 35 - write more
      I am glad that in Moldova there are such opinions. Recently, I have the feeling that in all republics except Belarus and Kazakhstan, the population is fooled by the anti-Russian propaganda of the West.
      Technical flaws are not important - your position is important. I am sure that I will see the author’s article from you
  14. Toma alistar
    Toma alistar 8 July 2011 10: 55 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Va multumesc de raspuns. As dori sa mai adaug urmatoarele: comentatorii nu au fost atrasi de articol intratat cat au fost atrasi de persoana Dumneavoastra, credeti-ma toti care au scris comenturi sunt militari sau fosti militari si va cunosc personal (inclusiv eu). Din punct de vedere psihologic faptul ca repetati de atatea ori ca articolul a atras "heated discussions" da dovada ca nu aveti incredere deplina in ceia ce ati scris si undeva in adancul sufletului va puneti intrebarea "Oare am scris bineu saine Si ultima, sunteti ofiter ati servit tara in care v-ati nascut (presupun), deci ar trebui sa cunoasteti ca ea se numeste Moldova si nu "Moldova". Am onoarea!
    luati exemplu de la Marat
  15. Toma alistar
    Toma alistar 8 July 2011 11: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For "Own"

    hear the pig, he speaks yours in swine, and you?
    I have nothing against the Russians, such statements are enraged. There is no way to see the good side that other nationalities communicate in Russian, it is necessary to insult.
  16. Toma alistar
    Toma alistar 8 July 2011 12: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Thank you to the moderator for joining our children's skirmish on time
  17. Joker
    Joker 8 July 2011 12: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    An excellent article, although in general this is deeply thoughtful and obvious to many, it is always important to back up these views with figures and facts.
  18. Nicolea
    Nicolea 8 July 2011 16: 35 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    O iaca ca am citit si eu statieau. Mai Nicolea da tu de cind esti asa de destept ca tare mult ma framinta sa spun si eu ce iti sta in cap ... Dar ma abtin, si bine fac dar tu ce dracu nu iti ajunge pensia militara pe care o ai ... . Dar una mai ai si o limba asa de mare ca ii lingi pe rusi din cap pina la coa .... Stii asa si trebuie oameni ca tine sint ca niste guzgani ..... Ea auzi Parcevschii expert al armatei da tu amintesteti ca nici testul psihologic nu ai putut sa treci. Yes, you have reached a mental state. Parth ticket in your pocket.
  19. BABY
    BABY 10 July 2011 15: 07 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    And you are really a mental patient. I doubted but after I read all your articles I stopped doubting. In Moldova, probably everything was closed (fools), but it’s a pity. In your style, I can only guess that you were a political officer. Only the politicians could do that. Comrades military men from the CIS who have remained in the Army political leaders chase them away they will betray you first. This is proved by history and once again by the author of these lines. But it seems - a lieutenant colonel of the reserve of the Armed Forces of Moldova, a military psychologist, a military analyst, a surveyor - does he even know what it is? Take a closer look at this author, you will still find out what paranoid he is !!!! An intelligent person who is really worth something, he would find himself and did not go so far as to combine various articles and impersonate an analyst. The truth is there is something in it (Analyst-geodeshuist). In Russia, there are two troubles of the road and fools, we see few Russian fools so clean up and Moldavian.
  20. Minister
    Minister 10 July 2011 19: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I read with interest all the articles of Parchevsky. Interesting stuff. But as noted only by this material about NATO, it provoked a stormy reaction. Looks like the author really got those who are promoting NATO policy here in Moldova, since they have sank to personal insults. The author has iron nerves and patience and it’s not easy for him to see with such open pressure and possible threats. I wish you success to the valiant officer.