Upgraded tank T-72B (T-72B3 with additional options). MILEX 2014

66






Upgraded T-72B tank (T-72B3 variant with additional options).
The main novelties of the presented tank they consist of an engine (1160 hp with automatic gear shifting), a new panoramic sight of the commander with a laser range finder (VOMZ), installation of a rear-view television camera on the aft sheet of the tank hull, and a number of other improvements.







The self-pulling log of the tank is placed on the starboard side (along the tank) in connection with the installation of a rear-view camera. The decision is very unfortunate, because completely prevents the strengthening of the sides of the dynamic protection.









Installation DZ on the tower is similar to the T-72B3. The gunner has a multichannel sight, Sosna-U, developed by the Belarusian Peleng JSC. The sight is not inferior to the level of modern world analogues.







Installing DZ "Contact-5" on WLD. On the first (left) photo, the DZ installation is visible, the entire upper plate of the bow section of the hull is not covered. What UKBTM designers thought when creating such a design remains a mystery.
In the photo on the right there is a cover for installation of DZ elements with a rubber gasket installed.













The photo shows the commander’s panoramic sight. It is surprising the carelessness of manufacturing, which readers can see in the photo on the protruding wires and boards.







A rear view video camera with a remote-opening curtain is installed on the stern sheet. It can be assumed that the place chosen is extremely unfortunate and the lens will be contaminated very quickly.







The tank uses a new engine-transmission unit with an engine power 1160 HP. and automatic gearshift.







On the sides of the tank installed power screens.







On the presented sample, the tracks developed by UKBTM with a new grouser structure are used, which reduce slip when turning and provide somewhat better reliability.







The tanks upgraded to this standard will participate in the upcoming international competition - “tank biathlon”.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. moldovan
    +7
    23 July 2014 09: 30
    Intersny article, but even so is not relevant. You show the armature at the end, otherwise I’ll leave the site))))
  2. +41
    23 July 2014 09: 36
    I hope that the developers of this modification are not involved in the development of Armata.
    1. +9
      23 July 2014 09: 56
      They are definitely involved in the development of World of tancs! Only the bourgeoisie could slip such a buggy and unfinished software, under the auspices of "MMM" !!!
  3. +11
    23 July 2014 09: 42
    The optics of the new sights are also not small.

    and the question to the tank crews - is the sense of the counting with the lower part made of tarpaulin - only the protection of the commander from wind / dust in marching mode?
    1. Jin
      +7
      23 July 2014 10: 10
      Quote: Kars
      and the question to the tank crews - is the sense of the counting with the lower part made of tarpaulin - only the protection of the commander from wind / dust in marching mode?


      Hello dear! Yes, just for that.
  4. +21
    23 July 2014 09: 43
    I can not understand the logic of placing DZ on the tower. Is it really difficult to add 1 block to the left of the gun? In general, the placement of DZ with slots is not entirely clear, why not provide placement on both t-90cm?
    1. +7
      23 July 2014 10: 38
      Quote: avdkrd
      I can not understand the logic

      All modernization as a whole is a gross abuse of the tank.
      Comparing what they do with "carrots", "lepard" or "Abrams" and with the T-72 and even the T-90, this is a perversion in the crudest form.
      Quote: Free Wind
      T-72 SPORT

      Rather, anti-sport and anti-tank.
      1. 0
        26 July 2014 23: 13
        I completely agree! Modernization T 72B3 Horrible - especially in the reservation ... The developer and the one who approved this modernization, in the tank and in Syria! God forbid understand how to hang DZ.
      2. 0
        1 August 2014 16: 04
        Oak and clumsy work. (((As assembled on the knee. The location of the remote control is tin, a hole on the hole. The bottom of the tower, the "surroundings" of the gun, the top of the hull's forehead ...
      3. 0
        1 August 2014 16: 12
        I have always been amazed by the technological oakiness and ergonomic stupidity of our technology. Everything sticks out, the assembly, maybe reliable, but oak - all around some details stick out at the corners. And so it is with everything. I’m generally silent about the management of old tanks, the T-55 and T-62 levers are a simulator for pitching. I really didn’t drive new tanks. BMP, however, differs from tanks for the better in the convenience of controls, but just as oak in terms of ergonomics. It is cold everywhere in winter, hot everywhere in summer.
    2. +2
      23 July 2014 15: 30
      tower T-72, so to speak, "spherical" shape
      1. Crang
        +4
        23 July 2014 15: 32
        This is the tower of the first base T-72. With a 280mm frontal dimension. The towers of the following models were already different. The T-72B tower is a cross between a circle and a triangle (base on the forehead) with a size of 450 mm and a reduced forehead thickness of 750 mm.
        1. +1
          23 July 2014 17: 21
          Not the point! The main thing is that the designers from the UKBTM cannot competently attach the development of the Scientific Research Institute "Steel"
          1. PLO
            +2
            23 July 2014 19: 48
            Not the point! The main thing is that the designers from the UKBTM cannot competently attach the development of the Scientific Research Institute "Steel"

            don't be silly
            here is the T-72B2
            1. +3
              23 July 2014 21: 11
              Quote: olp
              T-72B2

              Beauty, Oleg...
              almost ideal tankmen ... almost ...
              wink
              1. 0
                1 August 2014 16: 17
                Oh well .. ideal. Just an attempt to squeeze out at least a little bit from the concept of thirty years ago. The T-72 was ideal only in the early 80s. We are waiting for "Armata" and hope that it will not be a clumsy stool with a bunch of "glitches"
            2. +1
              23 July 2014 23: 02
              This is not stupid! These are emotions !!! maybe since 2006 something happened to them? Maybe they have an epidemic of meningitis with complications? Your assumptions !?
              1. PLO
                +1
                24 July 2014 17: 09
                the reason is simple.
                Serdyukov happened to us.
                It was under his leadership that the Defense Ministry adopted this clumsy modernization.

                UKBTM implemented its proposals in the T-72B2, but for the Moscow Region it turned out to be too expensive.
    3. +2
      23 July 2014 15: 33
      T-90 tower of simpler forms! It is puzzling why developers should not weld any overlays on the t-72 ?!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        23 July 2014 16: 03
        Just a screen, something like this! And on it already armor like T-90 can be put without gaps! Or is it technically not feasible !?
      3. 0
        1 August 2014 16: 19
        I don’t understand why the T-90 is not produced, but money is spent on such, sorry "modernization"?
    4. typhoon7
      +4
      23 July 2014 15: 58
      Welcome all. I remember when Sergey Shoigu became Minister of Defense, he was struck by the prices of our tanks and even threatened that he would be forced to buy foreign equipment. The Ministry of Defense would gladly buy a T-90 or T-90SM, of course this sounds absurd, but our military equipment is beyond our means. This also applies to tanks and planes and ships. At one time, GDP gave 1200 enterprises of the military-industrial complex for privatization, which he called untouchables. Now there are owners and shareholders. Therefore, the Minister of Defense called the patriotism of the leadership of the Uralvagonzavod in vain, the money of the Ministry of Defense was enough only for this grimace of tank building. Although I think that the T-90SM could be built with the money for their native country, the armor there seemed to be purchased abroad, but the difference in price is still not critical. At a tank biathlon, I think eighty would have looked better, also sowed from weapons, although in our latitudes the machine is indispensable and not so expensive, and Russia can produce it. The fact that they created special instances for biathlon also warps, the machine should be serial.
      1. +2
        23 July 2014 16: 23
        will it be a laugh when we lose at the international stage - or will this misery be brought to mind?
    5. Prjanik
      +1
      23 July 2014 23: 04
      If this modification was created exclusively for biathlon, then DZ is not needed there at all.)
  5. +7
    23 July 2014 09: 46
    T-72 SPORT. I did not understand the point of creating this unit at all. created for competition? So competition for military equipment. not for sports. I so dreamed of holding such competitions. about showing champions in tank all-around. USSR and Russia. But alas. show those who defend the homeland to TV channels in the bastard. A good undertaking turns into a farce and a comedy. Leave the racing to the cars then. they do it better. It's very unfortunate that this is happening.
  6. jj74
    +16
    23 July 2014 09: 50
    Every time, on all sites, everyone is interested in why such security holes? There is no answer anywhere sad Can't they see it themselves? If in this there is any thread, comrades tank crews, explain pliiiz. And it’s very sad
    1. +7
      23 July 2014 13: 50
      Quote: jj74
      If in this there is any thread, comrades tank crews, explain pliiiz.

      Who else would explain this to us ...
      They probably leave room for mounting wooden cartridge boxes, we’ve got used to them ... it's sarcasm.

      For example, the absence of the DZ block to the left of the gun is explained by the concern for the driver, so that it would be easier for him to get out of his heroic place ...
      Here is an explanation ...
      Caring, damn.

      For some reason, they solve this issue on T-72B2, T-90 and t-90ms, but they don’t succeed at all on T-72Б3 ... awesome explanation.

      Photo: protection of the frontal projection of the T-72Б2 tower.
      (the mechanic has a TVN-10 ... the Lytkarinsky plant is already ready for production in 2 of the year, eheh)
    2. +4
      23 July 2014 17: 16
      I am 100% sure comrades tankers are asking the same question
      If it makes any sense
      Personally, I have three possible answers!
      1. In MO are sitting complete dumbasses!
      2. In the Moscow Region there are people who do not care about the lives of tankers who, God forbid, have to go into battle on this G .... NOT
      3. In UKBTM there are "hands" who cannot be entrusted with any difficult task
      1. oledoyle
        0
        26 July 2014 08: 26
        Agents of influence sit in the Moscow Region
  7. +4
    23 July 2014 10: 25
    Automatic gearbox, parking camera, and a candey, a little cooking, an audio system! And his color in red and the emblem of a horse on the hood! Gentlemen, it’s all the same a tank, a Russian tank, not Ferari!
    1. +5
      23 July 2014 11: 05
      I would also add a navigator, a "bluetooth" system (to make it more convenient to use a mobile phone), install connectors for USB-flash drives for all crew members, fur seat covers for all of them, and tinted triplexes. That is to say, bring the tank to the "Premium" level.
      1. 0
        23 July 2014 15: 12
        On the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation in the section "Such biathlon" about the t-72 b ..
        http://xn--80ahclcogc6ci4h.xn--90anlfbebar6i.xn--p1ai/multimedia/infographics/pa
        rad / t-72.htm
        about biathlon ..http: //mil.ru/files/files/tb2014/tb-2014-uchast.html
      2. +1
        23 July 2014 18: 21
        The navigator costs TNA 3 is called (tank navigational equipment) this I declare to you as a tanker.
    2. 0
      1 August 2014 16: 25
      And in the summer, in hot regions, the candey, oh, would come in handy, under the armor in the heat it’s just like a scribe .. After the march, the crews will get so fucked up that in battle their effectiveness will be several times lower. So you're being ironic in vain. Yes, and normal stoves are needed for armored vehicles so that the mechanical driver does not warm up due to the removed bulkhead from the MTO (I'm talking about the BMP). We always traditionally "take care" of people - such as "endure". Freaks..
  8. 0
    23 July 2014 10: 25
    The tank will still have to apply the "skillful and caring hands of soldiers and technicians" directly in the units, if all this is not a limited series "for competition"
  9. +2
    23 July 2014 10: 27
    why are there a bunch of defense holes in the tower?
    1. +2
      23 July 2014 10: 50
      Quote: alex shnajder
      why are there a bunch of defense holes in the tower?

      Full protection is an additional option. And you have to pay for them. In short, everything is like under capitalism! laughing
  10. +4
    23 July 2014 10: 45
    Solid holes ... And why can’t you let a tank out, putting a minimal set of protection on it and at the same time leaving mounting space for extra? And to sell additional protection itself with kits? It will be more convenient! We need full protection, we went to the warehouse, got the kit, hung it in an hour and a half, left. Not needed, removed, handed over to the warehouse.
    1. +3
      23 July 2014 11: 19
      Quote: Wedmak
      And to sell additional protection itself with kits?

      Again SELL...
      How deeply, "in the subcortex" this bargaining has settled ...

      The army must RECEIVE and be SUPPLIED ...
      Business and Homeland Defense NOT COMPATIBLE.

      Where there is business, there is the desire to profit.

      A "brightly vyrygany" example of Benya toАLomoisha, making money in the war against the people and the blood of the people.
      1. -1
        23 July 2014 11: 36
        SELL again...

        In vain attached to the word. One way or another, weapons are being procured by our Defense Ministry and other countries. And is it often necessary to fully protect the tank for several million?
        In addition, such a kit (with fasteners) is easily captured on the international market - in several dozen countries, our tanks are still in service and even fight.
        1. +1
          23 July 2014 11: 47
          Quote: Wedmak
          In vain attached to the word.

          Not to the WORD, to PHENOMENON and TRENDS ...
          1. +1
            23 July 2014 12: 41
            As for our army, I agree that it must be supplied first. And then sell it. )))
  11. Leshka
    +2
    23 July 2014 11: 03
    not the best upgrade
  12. 0
    23 July 2014 11: 04
    Tank biathlon, besides entertainment, still has its benefit in the form of new operating systems on the machines themselves.
  13. +7
    23 July 2014 11: 07
    In addition to the jambs in protection, I would pay attention to the workmanship .. Who did this? Factory experts? Or low-skilled women and children evacuated beyond the Urals and for equipment of 41 years old? What kind of production culture multiplied by the idiocy of design engineers? Her guys need to do something with this .. As an example, a recent article on the site about the modernization of BMP 1 by the Poles! I don’t know how much combat capability there is, but the workmanship is sweet! The creators themselves are not ashamed to push such a thing? By God, it's time for the General or Military Prosecutor's Office to find out where the allocated money was spent! And who approved it all, who signed the work acceptance certificates .. As far as I know, there is a piece of paper with five signatures for each bolt, so it's time to answer for this! am Or are we waiting when there will be a full Pro..r at the tank biathlon? BUT what is even worse in real databases !!
  14. 0
    23 July 2014 11: 18
    Quote: jj74
    Every time, on all sites, everyone is interested in why such security holes? There is no answer anywhere sad Can't they see it themselves? If in this there is any thread, comrades tank crews, explain pliiiz. And it’s very sad

    Is it about the gaps between the corners?
    I don’t know for sure, but apparently explosives cannot be brought much closer, otherwise everything will detonate at once. The calculation on the fact that the gaps are much smaller and the probability of getting into them is minimal. IMHO
    1. 0
      23 July 2014 17: 33
      Quote: Denimax
      about the gaps between the corners?


      Or maybe it wasn’t enough to make DZ elements not in the form of standard rectangles, but in the form of trapezoids with the base outward, so that there were no holes ...
  15. Crang
    +1
    23 July 2014 11: 29
    Have the radar sights been redone?
  16. +3
    23 July 2014 11: 33
    I don’t understand why you need to create a separate modification for tank biathlon? This is not Formula 1. I thought that the point of these competitions was that the crews were competing in vehicles that were serial and armed with the participating countries. And then some kind of tuning went ... It's not clear ...
    1. +3
      23 July 2014 11: 43
      dust in the eyes, mini-Potemkin village, for one specific event.
  17. +1
    23 July 2014 12: 03
    "Budget tank", a workhorse, but its barrel is more powerful than that of the vaunted Leo-2, and the mobility of the vapsche is beyond competition, and the survivability of tanks is now about all the same on the battlefield .. in my opinion, a normal tank
  18. +1
    23 July 2014 12: 52
    Before you make the upgrade, you need to understand what exactly you want to improve. Strengthening the protection of our tanks is not even funny. Then they put a more powerful engine and sight. Before doing anything, they would ask the tankers themselves! The guys would suggest that how and where to do !!!!
    1. +1
      23 July 2014 19: 57
      Would anyone ask them at all it would be nice, would ....
  19. Alexey Prikazchikov
    -1
    23 July 2014 13: 17
    And why am I so despising Russian vkapshnikov ?????
    1. 0
      23 July 2014 22: 02
      Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
      And why am I so despising Russian vkapshnikov ?????

      You "respected" first work in the defense industry yourself, and not in a warm office, and then despise.
  20. +2
    23 July 2014 13: 34
    I will make a repost, since there is no point in writing a new one:

    So T-72B3M only for biathlon ...
    And the T-72B3 will be delivered to the troops ...
    Oh well.

    - They attached a thermal imaging panorama to the tower for the commander - this is certainly good ... a tanker’s ball.
    Just what is so absurd then?
    Such a banger...
    the lid is also unscrewed by hand, as on Pine-U?
    And TKN-3 was left to the commander, and therefore manual control unit, as TKN has no management outputs ...
    Eheh.

    - Blocks DZ as they defended anyhow as it was - and it remains.

    -Dvigl new, visible on the radiator caps.

    -But then the gearshift stuck with a traffic control system with a voice informant ...

    What can I say?
    Machine for racing, not for everyday service ...
    Of course, it’s a necessary thing, but for some reason it’s pulling something to grumble ... probably because, well, they cannot upgrade their T-72B to their minds.
  21. Crang
    +8
    23 July 2014 14: 39
    You need to catch one of the freaks who claimed such a look of the T-72B3M and push it well. And to do this picture with the arrangement:
    - this is for the cover of the "Pines" - angry
    - this is for your blocks DZ - angry
    - this is for TKN-3 - angry
    Well and so on. Turnip him a good soap.
    1. +3
      23 July 2014 17: 40
      I understand and in many respects share the indignation of the forum users over the obvious mistakes of this apparatus, both the idea itself and its implementation.

      Maybe give energy a constructive channel?

      An offer - an experienced "tank expert" will prepare a letter to the Ministry of Defense or UVZ, we will all sign it (like a petition, for example) ...

      Shall we try?
      1. Crang
        +2
        23 July 2014 18: 48
        Already wrote.
        1. 0
          23 July 2014 19: 29
          Quote: Krang
          Already


          And?
  22. dFG
    +1
    23 July 2014 17: 55
    Installation of DZ "Contact-5" on the VLD. On the first (left) photo, the DZ installation is visible, the entire upper plate of the nose unit of the body is not covered. What the UKBTM designers thought when creating such a design remains a mystery ........ MDA, what are the active defense complexes here Arena's foreheads are not covered whole .... the authors of the site, if you showed it to UVZ, let them lose the premium of unfortunate designers and to design work on Armata and not to close them close !!!
  23. dFG
    0
    23 July 2014 18: 00
    really interesting to compare the latest modernization of T 72 and Leopard 2 ??? ... machines that were created somewhere at the same time, plus or minus a couple of years, and both are called MBT
  24. +2
    23 July 2014 19: 11
    Has the log been upgraded?
  25. arthur_hammer
    0
    23 July 2014 19: 37
    yes damn .... the gaps between the blocks DZ on the tower are huge
    1. 52
      0
      26 July 2014 06: 54
      In! Dope! Well this is for ventilation! wink
  26. 0
    23 July 2014 19: 46
    Yes, it's a disgrace. Saved up.
  27. 0
    23 July 2014 20: 05
    And if the "partners" also start building sportsmen piece for the competition? The whole essence of tank biathlon will be perverted! The Chinese comrades will think about it, and next year they will bring the piece monsters.
  28. karachun
    0
    23 July 2014 23: 43
    Dear, but don’t tell me for a short period of time it is possible to train 3 peasants on this machine, how to manage to ride and shoot?
    1. 0
      25 July 2014 23: 57
      Regarding training, there is such a program for children's cognitive "galileo" so there they showed a foreign video, a drummer from U2 was invited to the tank unit in the Bundeswehr to teach how to drive a tank, from morning he drove a couple of hours on a simulator, before lunch they put on a special training tank with duplicated control, after lunch they put in a regular tank .. by the end of the day this civilian fuel oil passed the standard for passing the local route .. So, I honestly do not know whether to believe this, but somehow his maneuvers were dashing, and based on this I draw a conclusion It does not take much time to master this type of bourgeois technology, especially when you consider that the controls are the simplest two steering wheel pedals like in a car, the automatic transmission is ... so think that it is easier to master this or our worker-peasant technology, I'm afraid the bourgeois one is easier, and for the sake of God is not necessary about what, and if other delirium breaks down, not about that.
  29. karachun
    0
    23 July 2014 23: 46
    Yes esche vaprosik and what is the quantity of these units in our immense?)
  30. 0
    24 July 2014 01: 34
    With a fig, did all the cables drag aft?
  31. +1
    24 July 2014 14: 21
    the first cursory impression: the modernization of the tank did not turn out to be so, so-so, just to make it again, it seems that the authors of this device were too in a hurry to announce the applied innovations, but apparently cooked up ... negative
  32. +1
    24 July 2014 21: 32
    The modernized "T-64" Ukrop looks cooler. Our "T-72" somehow does not inspire, unfortunately.
  33. oledoyle
    0
    26 July 2014 08: 31
    Regarding the MTS-30 complex, someone spoke out that uncovered lenses can be fired with buckshot of a hunting shotgun. It’s the same here. But, sorry, he’ll see you for 2 kilometers and shoot you first. Article plus, expediency - a question)))
  34. 0
    29 July 2014 12: 38
    Quote: jj74
    Every time, on all sites, everyone is interested in why such security holes? There is no answer anywhere sad Can't they see it themselves? If in this there is any thread, comrades tank crews, explain pliiiz. And it’s very sad

    Just a budget option for our army, if you want better take t-90cm but more expensive! We have joint-stock military enterprises and care about profit!
  35. 0
    29 July 2014 18: 26
    Not a specialist, but flaws are immediately visible. Incomplete protection of VLD with DZ, what did they smoke there? request
  36. Denis fj
    +1
    24 August 2014 01: 43
    I want to add about hysteria about the T-72b3 tank, the tank will be modified to the T-90s level, that's what they said about the exhibition.

    Therefore, during the X International Exhibition of Arms, Military Equipment and Ammunition Russia Arms EXPO 2013 in Nizhny Tagil, it was reported that in 2014 it was planned to further develop the T-72B3 tank adopted by the Russian army. It is planned to install a commander's panoramic sight, equipment for a software and technical complex of a unified tactical level control system, as well as equipment for controlling remote detonation of ammunition.x
  37. 9CAM
    0
    25 August 2014 07: 46
    Lord T72B and all its subsequent modifications far and long to catch up with foreign counterparts, but the situation is as follows that the modification of the T72B3 is in any case better than the T72B2 and T72B1 and the modernization of this tank will be cut down by the branch not a lot of cabbage in countries that cannot afford the T90SM (breakthrough) . If the branch has upgraded, then something is being done there and it will get its piece of the pie from the deals. But we all know perfectly well that the T72 is becoming obsolete every day. And not today, but maybe tomorrow it will really become obsolete. As a result, UVZ will remain with the money for the next modernization of some kind of unit of its equipment. You don't like the curtain for the commander: "Why is it there? From dust, wind and dirt in marching mode?" If the curtain is stuck, then Abdul (the name is taken as an example) All this interferes with movement in the desert. And Abdulla will pay for the curtain.
    I agree not the best upgrade. But she was held. They stuck our Belarusian sight.
    Guys are a PR and I would not like to come to the exhibition without a new development ... So do not judge strictly. Engineers do what they can.
    I think that UVZ based on this modernization will gain experience for its further developments, and Russian tanks will respect even the most spoiled, foreign critics.
    1. Denis fj
      +1
      26 August 2014 01: 47
      the T-72 tank and its modernized versions are not yet obsolete. Abroad, they are also modernizing their tanks in the same way, and believe me, they also have enough junk there, it’s just that the question of a new tank, which should appear in 2015, has long been ripe and, as the Ministry of Defense says, we will we will see at the parade on May 9. And the T-72B3M tank will be the main tank in the armed forces. It just begs the question, will the T-72B3 tanks that arrived in units without a panoramic sight be upgraded to the T-72B3M version ???
  38. 0
    3 September 2014 22: 16
    Quote: Patton5
    I am 100% sure comrades tankers are asking the same question
    If it makes any sense
    Personally, I have three possible answers!
    1. In MO are sitting complete dumbasses!
    2. In the Moscow Region there are people who do not care about the lives of tankers who, God forbid, have to go into battle on this G .... NOT
    3. In UKBTM there are "hands" who cannot be entrusted with any difficult task

    4. CIA agents sit in the Moscow Region and the UKBTM and specifically create and accept such squalor.
  39. 0
    3 September 2014 22: 19
    By the way about DZ, it’s quite possible that they just save it so much — holes in the DZ are smaller than the size of the modern western ATGM model. (Unlikely)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"