Second Ukrainian nationalism - integral

Second Ukrainian nationalism - integral

In 1920, Dontsov, Bandera and Konovalets created a new type of nationalism, designed for a “strong hand”

"Russian Planet" continues the series of articles on stories Ukrainian nationalism. The first material in the series describes the origin of this movement. The second article talked about the development of Ukrainian nationalism in the second half of the XIX - early XX century and the emergence of "Mova". The third is about the Ukrainian nationalism of the time of the collapse of the Russian Empire.

After the end of the Civil War, a new stage in the development of Ukrainian nationalism began in the territories of the former Russian Empire. Borders once again divided the Ukrainian ethnos. Some Ukrainians became citizens of the Soviet Union, while others became part of restored Poland. It is on the territory of Poland that a fundamentally new ideological trend will emerge, which will later become the “banner” of supporters of a radical solution to the issue of creating a Ukrainian national state.

In the 1920s, there were three main ideological platforms that determined the intellectual climate of then-Europe. The first of these was the liberal-democratic one, whose supporters set as their main goal the prevention of a new world war through general disarmament and various peace initiatives. The second was represented by the communist idea, which rejected the entire system of the bourgeois world order and offered instead an alternative world of class fraternity. Finally, the third sought to sweep the Versailles law and order, putting at the head of the ideal of a national state. In varying proportions, all three leading ideologies were prevalent in all the states of continental Europe, except the USSR.

Yevgeny Konovalets. Photo:

Poland is no exception. Representatives of all three directions acted in the country, but the third way became dominant. In May, 1926, against the backdrop of an economic crisis and a wave of unemployment, the hero of war with Soviet Russia, Marshal Pilsudski, carried out a coup and established the so-called rehabilitation regime. It was an authoritarian rule, which proclaimed the need for strong power and criticized the system of liberal democracy, not forgetting to fight communism. As a result, the political life of Poland acquired a pronounced center-right, conservative-paternalistic character. It was in such an ideological and political environment that the Ukrainian national movement developed in Poland, and it was the environment that determined its ideological platform.

The first organization, which can be considered as a representative of the new trend of Ukrainian nationalism, was called the Ukrainian Military Organization (UVO). It was headed by Yevgeny Konovalets - former commander of the Ukrainian Sich Riflemen. It was a relatively small military unit that fought on the territory of Galicia during the Civil War on the side of the West Ukrainian People's Republic. The actual surviving members of this division formed the basis of the new organization.

The choice of the ideology of the SVR was to some extent predetermined by its composition. The former soldiers of the disappeared state were representatives of the group of “extra people”, which became the social base for authoritarian and totalitarian regimes in Europe. Lost in society, they turned to the ideal of a strong power, but the power is not abstract, but national. Since in Poland the Ukrainians could not find such power by definition, the logical conclusion was the struggle for the creation of an independent Ukraine.

The new ideology is called integral nationalism. It was based on the following beliefs: the belief that a nation is the highest value in relation to everyone else; a call for solidarity of all people belonging to the nation; confidence that the will of the nation can be embodied in a particular leader; respect and glorification of aspects of human activity related to force and war.

The most important role in the formulation of this doctrine was played by Dmitry Dontsov. In the past, a supporter of the Central Council and the Ukrainian People’s Republic, it was he who in 1926 wrote the landmark work “Nationalism”, which became a classic in nationalist circles. In this book, he criticized the classics of Ukrainian nationalism (Kulish, Franco, Dragomarov), accusing them of provincialism. In his book, he developed the idea of ​​"Svidomo" -a conscious group of citizens whose task was to lead the Ukrainian people. This group was supposed to be the embodiment of the will of the nation and its organizing force.

At the scene of the murder of Eugene Konovalets. Photo:

Such an ideological platform was attractive to former Ukrainian soldiers. She not only justified their struggle during the Civil War, but also created a prospect for future accomplishments. Inspired by the ideas of radical nationalism, members of the SVR carried out a number of terrorist acts against Polish politicians, including an attempt to assassinate Marshal Pilsudski. Their main goal became politicians who advocated a peaceful Polish-Ukrainian coexistence. Moreover, the nationality of politicians did not matter - Ukrainians also became victims of terrorist acts.

In addition to the Konovalets group, several other organizations emerged - supporters of integral nationalism: the League of Ukrainian Nationalists, the Group of Ukrainian National Youth, the Union of Ukrainian Nationalist Youth. In 1929, these groups united and created the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists - OUN. Among its active members were two key figures in addition to Konovalets - Stepan Bandera and Andrei Melnik. Personal relations between them were strained, which later in wartime conditions even led to military clashes between their subordinates.

The OUN continued its terrorist activities, begun by its predecessors, but did not bring anything fundamentally new into ideology, with the exception of compiling the so-called Decalogue of the Ukrainian Nationalist - the creation of Stepan Lenkavsky, who summed up the ideology of integral nationalism in ten theses.

After the Soviet intelligence service Konovalets was liquidated in 1938 earlier, the single organization was divided into groups of Stepan Bandera and Andrei Melnik. Both groups were closely associated with German intelligence, which planned to use them in a future war against the Soviet Union.

However, despite all efforts to win sympathy among the population of Polish Ukraine, the success of the HEI and the OUN in 1920 — 1930-s was much more modest than the expectations of its leaders. Most Ukrainians did not support the strategy of terror and remained indifferent to the appeals of radical groups. That all changed with the accession of Western Ukraine to the Soviet Union in 1939 and the subsequent Sovietization policy. As part of this policy, a cultural revolution was carried out, a number of repressions were carried out and, most of all, the local population was outraged by the policy of collectivization.

Welcome text of the OUN 1941 on the Glinskaya Brahm Castle in the town of Zhovkva, Lviv region: “Glory to Hitler! Glory to Bandera! Long live the independent Ukrainian cathedral Power! Long live the leader of Art. Bandera! Glory to Hitler! Glory to the invincible German and Ukrainian armed forces! Glory to Bandera! ”Photo:

As a result, for the bulk of the Western Ukrainian peasantry, the Soviet government became an enemy, depriving them of land and encroaching on their ancient faith. This circumstance is the reason for the extremely high support by the population of Western Ukraine of the OUN in 1941. Later, the level of support will begin to fall, but it remained significant after the end of the Second World War.

The activities of the OUN and its combat wing of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army during the Second World War represented a struggle against all. After the euphoria of the initial successes achieved in alliance with Nazi Germany, it was understood that an independent Ukraine does not fit into the plans of both parties to the conflict. As a result, during the war, the Western Ukrainian rebels fought against the Red Army, and the Soviet partisans, and against German units, and even among themselves. After the victory of the Soviet Union, the remaining members of the rebels in the territory of Ukraine continued their struggle against the forces of the NKVD and the Soviet administrations, which also ended in defeat.

So, in 1920 — 1930-ies a second direction of Ukrainian nationalism was born, fundamentally different from the classical one. In their ideological theories, Ukrainophiles repelled cultural studies and ethnographic studies, and thought of themselves as an organic part of the Ukrainian people and, above all, the peasantry. It was from folk culture that they drew inspiration for their works. The nationalists of the 1920-s built a completely different ideology. Proclaiming, on the one hand, the primacy of the nation over all other values, in fact, they were deeply disrespectful to the opinion of Western Ukrainians themselves. Seeing themselves as “Svidomians”, they believed that the Ukrainian people themselves were in a state of apathy and delusion, from which they should be led out with a strong hand.

Both trends developed “from above”: they were created by groups of intellectuals, but Ukrainophiles viewed the people with respect and respect, and OUNvtsy saw in it only a means to realize their dreams. The losing soldiers of the civil war, seeking to find their place in life and fill it with meaning, ultimately created an ideology convenient only for themselves, because it put them above other people and set a noble goal for the struggle. After losing in World War II, radical Western Ukrainian nationalists became part of a historical myth, which was revived only a few decades later, in order to encounter the old adversary, classical Ukrainian nationalism. This confrontation will begin on the eve of the country's independence at the end of the Soviet era.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    18 July 2014 09: 10
    Eternal traitors what else to say ...
  2. +4
    18 July 2014 09: 42
    As part of this policy, a cultural revolution was carried out, a series of repressions was carried out.
    Evil NKVD officers ... forced to go to school, libraries, watch movies ..
  3. +2
    18 July 2014 09: 50
    What kind of state did the Ukrainian nationalists want to build? And did ordinary Ukrainians themselves guess what kind of "paradise" they were preparing? I read one book here at my leisure, and a clearly pro-Ukrainian and anti-Soviet author, so a totalitarian state abruptly emerges there, the Third Reich, with death squads and other "delights" such as mass executions and large-scale repressions, only a finished maniac Nazi will live comfortably in such a "paradise", so this is probably what played in the defeat of the Bandera movement, along with the successful actions of the USSR Ministry of State Security. So today's vegetables galloping on Maidan just as they say "not in the subject," that with the Bandera movement so beloved by them, they wouldn’t even jump on the Maidan without the permission of the state, but they wouldn’t even dare to utter a word, otherwise they would immediately snitch and there would be hard labor or execution.
    1. Koresh
      18 July 2014 10: 10
      Dear, write the name of the book
      1. 0
        18 July 2014 11: 01
        Author: A. Gogun
        Title: Between Hitler and Stalin. Ukrainian rebels.
        Publisher: Neva
        Year: 2004
        Pages: 416
        1. Koresh
          18 July 2014 11: 38
          Do not read. I will read then I will give you an answer
  4. +4
    18 July 2014 11: 09
    That's right, I. Stalin burned this infection, you need to burn it now. No other way, because this process is irreversible. You can agree that they imposed this infection, but their fault is that they accepted it.
  5. olega211
    18 July 2014 11: 26
    It is necessary to enclose a wall from them. Only eastern Ukrainians feel sorry.
  6. +1
    18 July 2014 13: 34
    Thank God that all this Bandera bastard - Bandera, Konovalets, shukhvichs and others like that have been removed for a long time in the next world. Hope burning in hell. And soon they will be added to them Poroshenko, egg-laying and other warm company. Together they will be more fun.
  7. +1
    18 July 2014 15: 07
    The author of modern Ukrainian nationalism as a political theory is Lukyanenko Levko Grigoryevich. The basic postulate of Lukyanenko’s theory is: “... the Ukrainian is found on the ground; “God over Ukrainian Ukrainian intellectual potential ...”. Since we all know that God first created only one person - Adam, it follows from this postulate that the first person on earth was a Ukrainian. Well, then all other nations and nationalities, the so-called “subhuman”, who should serve the Ukrainians, providing them all, went from him. Here is such a theory! And in the European Union, they strove so hard, not stopping at the killings of people, in the hope that he would feed them sweetly and drink “for free”.
    1. vitos8854
      19 July 2014 14: 16
      I look at them the mayor of Kiev intellectual)))
  8. 0
    18 July 2014 16: 03
    No matter how sick, if only she died ...
  9. 0
    18 July 2014 21: 24
    for the sake of interest - against which German units did Bandera "fight"?
  10. +1
    18 July 2014 23: 26
    History does not know of any serious military clashes between Bandera and the Germans, but the supply of everything necessary for the war by the Nazis, especially in 1943-44, was regular.
  11. AX
    19 July 2014 10: 26
    Mind Ukraine can not understand ... Yes, and the same ass ...
    1. vitos8854
      19 July 2014 14: 18
      Ass they understand!
  12. 0
    20 July 2014 21: 32
    Perhaps Ukraine will not remain in the form it was now, the protest South East will no longer be next to the national-fascist West. Today's civil war has shown that those who "lead" the country, and these are Moydan's pravoseki, plunge their own people into a fratricidal war while using the army against the civilian population. All this is happening in the southeast of the country where ethnic Russians live. They do not care how many people die, they are not Ukrainians, but the damned. Therefore, without hesitation, they use heavy weapons in peaceful cities. But it may also happen that the protest southeast will reach Lviv. In a situation where today the situation is changing and the national army of dill is already in the role of the defender, it is possible that now the rebels will attack and flee svidomo.
  13. 0
    25 July 2014 10: 49
    However! It’s a bit much for men-runners from SEU. Women, children are fleeing the war, understandably. But men should take up arms? Something seems to me to sit out the most
    hard time and succumb to asking back. To Ukraine! Somehow people do not believe that
    fighting ... It’s just that the population was in the thick of things. And there they started shooting ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"