Conventions of a bourgeois court

Conventions of a bourgeois court

The workers asked me to comment on the death of Novodvorskaya.

There are many points of view on its multifaceted activities. Including even the aesthetic point of view (this is when they talk a lot about hapenning, shocking and provocative).

I believe, however, that the casket opens simply. The deceased was a fool, but came to success, because she lived all her life in the land of fools.

From stupidity (her and his loved ones) she died. As I understand it, she had a furuncle on her leg, so to speak, apparently due to an unhealthy diet. She began to treat him herself (that is, to crush and lubricate with greens) and to heal to the state of blood infection. None of the many friends and acquaintances advised Novodvorskaya to go to the hospital, although it was clear that the last time she had moved with difficulty. Alas!

For some strange association of ideas, Novodvorskaya in the country of fools was ranked among the liberals (!!!) I put three exclamation marks, because this is a triple absurdity.

First, liberalism presupposes intellectual freedom, which a priori leads to extreme tolerance for other views and a penchant for intellectual polemics. The exchange of views for Novodvorskaya has always been a forceful pushing through of primitive slogans, which, moreover, were in logical contradiction with each other. She never took someone else's point of view into account and always considered either meanness or madness. Any criticism was perceived as a provocation and a personal insult. His political history reduced to the fact that she was put in a mental hospital for the truth.

Liberalism is never radical. It is always a “middle-half” by the fireplace, relating to everything rather calmly and ironically. Including myself to myself.

Here we come to the "second". Novodvorskaya was completely devoid of any self-irony, although she looked very funny and often said (of course, involuntarily) funny things. As you know, beauty is a terrible force. Suppose that Novodvorskaya would be a black-eyed oriental beauty with a beautiful chest voice. Probably, and even probably in society, they would perceive it completely differently. There would still be little sense in her utterances, but there would be a noble impulse and a social magnet for the crystallization of social movement. In general, Chirikov threshes the same nonsense as Novodvorskaya, and her surname is even worse, but outwardly this is the type of evil beautiful blonde who is constantly in bed with her beloved husband on the basis of passionate temperament. And under this sauce you can carry any nonsense - the men swallow and ask for supplements.

Madame Chirikova

Reason is quirky and you can get ANY benefit from any situation. Novodvorskaya did not extract any benefit from their ugliness, for the very reason that she did not understand how she looked from the outside. Of course, it is customary to err on this account to any person, including the author of these lines. But there are limits to everything.

While appearances prompted Novodvorskaya to wise self-irony and rejection of arguments designed for an emotional effect, her entire biography is an affectation of political charisma, which in the case of Novodvorskaya was not up to absolute ABSOLUTE ZERO. Instead of Evita Perron and Dolores Ibarruri, we saw what we saw. And what we saw, constantly sent the public enticing glances and flirtatious hints. I wonder what?

Dolores Ibarruri

Evita Peron

Valery Novodvorskaya

Finally, thirdly, liberalism cannot exist by itself. Perhaps that is why we do not have it, but what was before the revolution was so-so strong.

Liberalism is a free affiliation of ideas, which is possible only in an information-transparent world. And what do we know about Novodvorskaya itself? Until now, very little is known about it. For example, she recently announced about her father that he forged documents and fled to America. And her mother, according to official data, "comes from the pillar noblemen of the Usatikh merchants" How can these merchants be pillar nobles?

There is a legend that in childhood Novodvorskaya was a pretty child and it was ruined by kegebists. Something is different. Who is sitting on the right, I'm afraid to guess.

And so in Novodvorskaya everything. Both the father and mother of Novodvorskaya were communists, she had fought all her life with the "commies" with the methods of the Fadeev Young Guard. Starting with scattering leaflets in the Kremlin Palace of Congresses. Novodvorskaya all her life called her political opponents insane, while it was completely obvious that she also needed psychiatric help all her life and received this help. What does not justify the vile Soviet regime in the methods of its political revenge, but once again emphasizes the stupidity of our society, in the degree of this stupidity reaching the phase of hypocrisy.

So personal stupidity and personal illness of Novodvorskaya superimposed on the stupidity and disease of the society in which she lived and the flesh of the flesh of which she was. Which led to the absolute success of her social career (with such and such starting data).

If we compare Novodvorskaya’s care with other events of this kind, then probably this is Chernomyrdin’s death. The titans of the 90's carnival are leaving.

But to me, when I looked at Novodvorskaya (and I met her in real life), Russian liberals of the end of 19, the beginning of the 20 century, always came to mind. Like Hamu Milyukov, who became Minister of Foreign Affairs, as well as playing the violin with a broken finger and having cruelty to make him listen. And in general “having cruelty” If the motto of the Russian officer was “I have the honor”, ​​then the motto of the Russian liberal “I have cruelty”. When a liberal pig in pince-nez was breaking into the living room and began to laugh:

- Gentlemen, I beg of you ... no, gentlemen, in Moscow, the Grand Duke Sergius tore it up ... They found the hand on the roof ... Gentlemen, they deigned to think their brains!

A flurry of laughter, applause.

In general, a new dish arrived at the Maidan: “fried Colorado beetles in Odessa”. Ha ha haa !!!

And what this African "liberalism" ends with?

"Optimistic tragedy" Vsevolod Vishnevsky. When an old woman’s purse on Maidan was stolen, they let her down to the centurion, he builds fighters, the grandmother points to the eleventh: “Seem this, Iris”. "Iris" knit in the fire. He: "I demand the last word!" And the leader to him: "The last word is the convention of a bourgeois court." And then the grandmother's wallet finds: “Oh, I mistook, I fell behind the lining!” Babanu, too, on the fire.

Well, scho, son, liberal did not bachil?

Then Russian liberalism develops - on the fire of the leader himself. He: “Brothers, give the last word!” And to him: “And these are the conventions of a bourgeois court!”

- Shh! Aaaaaaa!

Or Vishnevsky:


Ugly people walk on the ground, they kill each other, all the prominent places have the right signs: “liberal”, “democrat”, “humanist”, “good-natured”. It seems everything is there. And there is no happiness, as there was not ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    17 July 2014 08: 33
    Who's next?
    1. 0
      17 July 2014 09: 23
      Why are you comparing this young woman with Viktor Stepanovich Chernomyrdin ??? The only politician of the 90s to whom there was at least a drop of respect - only because of him the country did not collapse completely - Tatarstan, Bashkiria, Udmurtia did not leave - and in fact in the 94th the same liberals - Novodvorskaya, Starovoitova and others like them supported as Chechen separatists, both Tatar and Bashkir, Yeltsin was in a binge, and Chernomyrdin pulled the country. And his conversation with Basayev? As for the theft - he stole - but it was impossible to get out of the swamp unstained.
    2. +3
      17 July 2014 09: 55
      Makarevich forgot to insert into the collage!
      1. +1
        17 July 2014 11: 01
        Quote: Baron Wrangell
        Makarevich forgot to insert into the collage!

        If you insert everyone you would like and who "deserves" - a lot of space will be needed ...
      2. Svarog75
        17 July 2014 14: 02
        If you paste them all, then no collage is enough bully
  2. +3
    17 July 2014 08: 36
    The deceased’s activities can be treated differently (I don’t even want to polemicize on this topic) ... but the mental state was extremely difficult ... the diagnosis is crazy, it is most likely true ... did she get it in prisons / asylums ... or since childhood it was slightly abnormal we won’t know ... and it’s not interesting.
    In general, one crazy woman on the stage of the liberals has become less ...
    1. 0
      17 July 2014 09: 57
      Quote: silberwolf88
      but the mental state was extremely difficult ... the diagnosis - insanity is most likely true

      as previously studied psychiatry, sluggish schizophrenia with a bunch of signs
  3. +4
    17 July 2014 08: 36
    In my opinion, too much attention is paid to this crazy person. Buried, but buried. Remaining behind the cordon or durik. The air will be cleaner!
  4. +4
    17 July 2014 08: 38
    Novodvorskaya in RUSSIA as Mazepa in Ukraine. RUSSIA has done so much evil that it cannot be counted. And after all, there are followers of this unfinished counter. am am am
  5. +5
    17 July 2014 08: 38
    I was shocked when I read a lot of anti-Russian comments on an article on her death about the good Novodvorskaya and the evil quilted jackets that attacked Ukraine on a Belarusian website
    And we have close supporters of the "occupation" theory
  6. +1
    17 July 2014 08: 41
    “Why do you have a scar on your forehead?” Take the trouble to explain to this lady.
    - I’m wounded on the Kolchak fronts.
    Mikhail Bulgakov, "Heart of a Dog"
  7. +5
    17 July 2014 09: 04
    She lived with a teal in her head, died of chirya on her leg.
    Worthy end.
    Along the way, she became the hero of Ukraine - posthumously.
    1. +3
      17 July 2014 09: 08
      Quote: Wellych
      She lived with a teal in her head, died of chirya on her leg.
      Worthy end.
      Along the way, she became the hero of Ukraine - posthumously.

      "He lived a sin and died funny" ...
      (inscription on the grave of I. Barkov)
    2. +3
      17 July 2014 09: 20
      No, she lived in an armored trooper and not with a boil, but with a worm in her head, and in addition with a torpedo, also in her head
      1. 0
        17 July 2014 09: 28
        Quote: CARLSON
        No, she lived in an armored trooper and not with a boil, but with a worm in her head, and in addition with a torpedo, also in her head

        There, along the way, there was no torpedo in my head ...
        There - ammunition from the "Tornado" ...
  8. +2
    17 July 2014 09: 35
    There is an ancient saying: "About the dead it is either good or nothing but the truth." This is in contrast to the saying: "About the dead, it's either good or nothing." Somehow it turns out more honest. Language will not turn to say a kind word about the person who poured so much slop on the Russian people, Putin, our history. One phrase: "The Russian nation is a cancer of humanity!" what is it worth, or "The Russian people have a place in prison, and not just anywhere, but in a prison bucket ...". We Christians sometimes have a judgment about a person after his death. For example, if a person took suffering for Faith, we believe that that person is holy and accepted by the Lord into his abodes. Or, on the contrary, he rotted alive, which means he did not please God with his life, go to eternal torment. By the way, a certain Arius, who denied the Holy Trinity, died very revealingly, his rectal sphincter was rotting and sending out his natural need he simply vomited his insides. So, I suppose, Novodvorskaya did not please God, she really hated people very much.
  9. 0
    17 July 2014 09: 50
    The author, IMHO, takes too much on himself. Himself, you see, from the ideological liberals, since Russia is his "Country of Fools". Although he described the ulcers of liberastism well. And the deceased is watered, it seems, because, you see, she dared to compromise such good fighters with the "country of fools" with her toad-like carcass and banged head. So to speak, not for the content of the struggle against Russia, but for the form that fought. By the way, kicking a dead person is not a great courage, he would say this to the "babolera" in the eyes during his lifetime, he would instantly turn into a "commie".
  10. 0
    17 July 2014 14: 16
    That would be to her in the next world, fail on the bridge ... a plague on her garden. am
  11. 0
    17 July 2014 15: 56
    She’s dead, and she’s dear to her. And let her land be a stone.
  12. 0
    17 July 2014 16: 25
    Forgive me for being rude, but I want to say the words of Alexander the First to the death of Prince Potemkin. "Dead, one less scoundrel has become," although Prince Potemkin did not deserve such words. And the last virgin of Russia not only deserved, but did everything to be worthy of the tsar's statement ... hi
  13. +1
    17 July 2014 19: 54
    People are human! Don't dirty yourself by dirtying the dead! The measure will be determined by the Court, which is not subject to us. As the saying goes, "Nicodemus died, and to hell with him." We must live on ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"