Full Interview - here to register:.
If some young lady similar to Galina Pyshnyak would have told the same to representatives of some Ukrainian channel, but only about the “atrocities” of the militia, the public from the category of “gloryaukrayin” zombied with ukroSMI materials would surely believe in such statements I would begin to look for an answer, how to punish "klyatyh Moskaliv" - by atomic bombings with the help of American "friends", for example ... But we here, it seems, would not have survived the mind to take such shocking statements on faith without any For more evidence, and other evidence. You can, of course, say that no additional evidence is needed, but you must immediately use the words of Galina Pyshnyak for urgently entering troops or for some far-reaching actions.
But stop! Has there not already been something like this in the world stories? Let us mentally transfer to the 1990 year, when from the mouth of a supposedly ordinary Kuwaiti girl sounded "evidence" of the soldiers of Saddam Hussein killing Kuwaiti children, ruining the Kuwaiti maternity hospital. The girl started a tear at the camera and, on beautiful English, told the western public about the horrors of the Iraqi military. By the way, then many people had a question, but where did a girl from a Kuwaiti village so fluent in English speak so well, and almost without an accent?
Journalists "took up" for this girl. It turned out that the brilliant knowledge of English is explained very simply: the girl was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US ... Apparently, the co-authorship of the horror was composed by a horror film (or it was just put on the table after the offer of her daughter’s services to the role), she read the text to the public, letting out tears where necessary, and a big war began for oil in the Middle East and, by the way, the war de facto does not end so far. A monstrous lie spawned a monstrous massacre with hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded in more than two decades.
So what - option with Galina Pyshnyak from the same series? It turns out that Channel One has given unverified information from a single “witness” to a multi-million audience in the absence of a description of the tragedy from other “eyewitnesses”, in the absence of at least one single frame from the scene, and all this taking into account the fact that in Slavyansk, according to Pyshnyak, there was a large crowd. You can, of course, say that no one has shot such terrible scenes, as people were shocked, but so be it - and why, then, only Pyshnyak alone (no one else) talks about the tragedy, and all the other "witnesses" just refer to her story? If everything that the respondent was talking about in an interview with a Channel One journalist is a lie, then who benefits from it today? Is the “First Channel” really engaged in openly inciting discord and provoking the introduction of Russian troops into the territory of Ukraine?
It is believed that everything is not quite so, or rather, not at all. It seems that the flames of the information war have captured the representatives of the central channels on both sides of the barricades so much that in pursuit of sensation, the channels decide to publish the most incredibleNews". UkroSMI claims that in the House of Trade Unions in Odessa, people themselves burned Molotov cocktails and poisoned them with gas (a sort of mass suicide), that the militias themselves level their relatives' houses with the ground, that Kremlin agents kill Maidan activists in the dark gates. The Russian leading channels fell for this informational provocation (akin to an arms race) and also began to broadcast either what was not at all, or information that needs verification. It turns out that if you look at the interview with Galina Pyshnyak without any far-reaching conclusions, then everything is simple: such an interview seemed to “Channel One” a real information bomb, and this bomb was blown up on the air.
Well, and if all the same publication of the interview - it is not only the chase of the channel for the ratings? In this case, it is worth going back to the episode with the "testimonies" of a Kuwaiti girl "of the ruin by Iraqi soldiers of a maternity hospital in Kuwait." Then this "testimony" served as a powerful impetus for the start of the invasion of American troops. Today, the heart-rending story of a Ukrainian refugee is aimed at the fact that Russia should intervene. If children are crucified and tied to women’s tanks, then surely they should ...
But if the story of the crucifixion of a baby in front of hundreds of citizens has only one “witness”, is it impossible that some forces use such a “witness” with the script offered to him to memorize as a first-class provocateur. What exactly is provoked? Obviously, the introduction of Russian troops. Is it provoked by the Russian side? Hardly. Russia and without more than strange "testimonies" of Mrs. Pyshnyak have enough reasons to send troops (shelling of the territory of the Rostov region with the first victims of what they are worth!), But that's the point: the troops are not being sent, since repetitions are already in the center of Europe the Russian authorities’s Middle Eastern nightmare provoked by Washington (hopefully, for the most part) don’t want to. Victims among the Russians - it's terrible, but how many such victims will there be if Russia is still involved in a big war? There are many other ways to punish the Kiev junta - without entering the Russian army, which is so awaited by the "partners."
Then the conclusion is: the story of the crucifixes of babies can be implanted by those who wish to draw Russia into a bloody adventure. And there are plenty of such today both behind the “big pool” and in the territory of Ukraine itself. One needs to reset trillions of debts, others - to distract people from the further plundering of the country. The external enemy in the person of Russia is needed by both, and therefore it is necessary to be ready for new and new provocative throw-ins.
Of course, all these conclusions do not in any way suggest that ukrosiloviki are white and fluffy. To bombard their own compatriots from multiple rocket launchers, cover them with artillery, mortars, send missiles to kindergartens and hospitals, destroy journalists - all this is a set of serious war crimes for which the guilty will sooner or later be held responsible. But you also need to have your head on your shoulders in order to separate the wheat from the chaff and the flies from the chops against the background of obvious facts. Stories with “devastated maternity hospitals”, ampoules with “anthrax” and all the others from the same provocative series, which turned into a zombie herd of western inhabitants, should not play a similar role in relation to Russians. And the federal media should be more attentive to the stories of “eyewitnesses of crucifixes of babies” or people from the OPS agency (one grandmother said) ... One untested or deceptive material for the viewer can play a much bigger role than a hundred truthful ones, ruining the reputation of the media.
One of the main TV channels of the country does not exactly color the presentation of information, which, at least, requires confirmation. Otherwise, such a channel has all the chances to become an analogue of the Ukrainian mass disinformation ("Ukrainian Krivda"), broadcasting misinformation under the guise of obvious and unbelievable.