Ukraine. With reliance on shtetl Nazism ...
At one of the recent roundtables on information security, the following assumption was made:
- In Ukraine, people are likely to be subjected to some kind of psychotropic influence, and, moreover, very powerful. Many callers from Russia tell their acquaintances and relatives about the pronounced inadequacy of the Ukrainian interlocutors. People just do not know. They are hostile, do not listen to any arguments.
Indeed, in the last five years alone, the number of those who consider Russia to be a real enemy has increased almost 10 times, and now the number of such people is in the 40% area. This data polling, and the hostile moods are growing. But is it possible to bring millions of people to a similar state with psychotropic drugs? It is unreal: so powerful weapons and in such quantity does not exist yet. And what is there?
There are methods of mass propaganda and technology, traditional, for centuries and decades, worked out and polished, and the latest - information and psychological warfare. Moreover, it is conducted against the background of the socio-economic crisis and the armed conflict that broke out in the south-east of Ukraine. We must not forget that the military confrontation itself, with hundreds of officially recognized, and most likely thousands of victims, is also the result of many years of targeted propaganda carried out not without the help of numerous Western foundations for the development of democracy and civil society. It all began more than twenty years ago with rewriting storieswhen the united Russian world began to be presented in the form of centuries of warring two nations - Russian and Ukrainian, where the first is the eternal cunning aggressor and dishonest neighbor.
In Russia, for many years, with irony and sarcasm, they spoke about the “globe of Ukraine”, about Ukrakh, who allegedly invented and discovered everything - a wheel, a plow, steam, toothpicks, and, possibly, toilet paper. How else to relate to such a quote from the history book:
- Ukrainians are a great nation who once inhabited almost all of Europe. The Gauls - the inhabitants of Galicia (Galicians - Western Ukrainians), Galicia (in Spain), Gaul - in France and Northern Italy and the Gels - Scots, as well as the Irish - are one and the same people. Part of the Galicians inhabited and Thrace. So Spartak and Bandera are national heroes of our homeland.
But such a primitive, parochial in essence, the idea of national exclusiveness, contrary to common sense, more and more conquered and conquers the hearts and minds of the fraternal people yesterday. And Russia, by and large, did not try to play on this side of the information field, believing that it would be able to decide everything at closed and open negotiations about the price and terms of gas contracts. And as a result of such blindness, hundreds of Ukrainian interpreters of history and modernity were unsuccessfully able to convey to their readers, viewers and listeners, for example, Oleg Soskin, professor of the Ukrainian National Academy of Management, constantly introduces the audience:
- The Muscovites stole the language, the Orthodox faith, the name of the country from the Ukrainian people, and now the time has come to return all this to us. And they should return to their Finno-Ugric, Turkic foundation. The bandit Peter stole the genetic name “Russia” from Ukraine, calling his empire the Latin letters Russia, which became known in the Romano-Germanic world as “Rush”. And the Finno-Ugric transformed it into "Russia."
Perhaps many believed and believe that there is no point in arguing with clearly illiterate delusions. Say, is it possible to steal a language? He, as you know, is developing beyond the control of the will of the rulers, good or evil, it does not matter. Making the people speak out of hand is impossible. And faith? It is either there or not, and if it’s common, you should be so proud of it. With the name of the country, the professor again has bloopers worthy of a schoolchild of Losers. It is clear that the professor likes the phrase “Roman-German”, but he clearly does not understand its meaning. “Rush” is in English, and “Russland”, let's say, in German. Where at the same time there were some Finno-Ugric people who gave us "Russia" is completely unknown.
However, such nonsense, in spite of everything, is becoming, speaking in a professorial way, a trend and the main discourse of modern Ukrainian politics. Thus, the deputy of the Verkhovna Rada, Ivan Stoyko, at a meeting of the Parliament recently stated that his country is waging war with the “Mongoloid race” and “Fascist Russia”, which like a locust climbs on Ukraine to destroy our state, our nation. The parochial Nazism in the words of the professor and the deputy is presented very clearly. This is a mixture of homegrown racist theory, which is mixed simultaneously with one’s own supposed exclusiveness and inferiority. A mixture of superiority and servility, when your own farm - is the center of the universe, and your neighbor always causes envy, which leads to Kurkul hatred. And at the same time dense ignorance is given out for the top of intellectual wisdom. By the way, this is the current phenomenon of Ukrainians. This is not yesterday's Bandera with the primitive idea of the destruction of Muscovites without claims of intellectual superiority. And at the same time, it is customary to say that Ukraine is certainly a European country. How to deal with European tolerance, when hostility to a different nation and race and rushing. Poor Europe, whom she warmed on her chest!
Today in Ukraine all leading Russian TV channels are banned. And own propaganda (there is no talk of neutral objective journalism now) fulfills the recommendations of the National Council on Television and Radio Broadcasting, as well as of the Independent Media Trade Union. In one of them advise:
- Do not help the enemy to disorient citizens of Ukraine - many of them, hearing the name of the battalion, doubt whether they are Ukrainian or Russian units. Instead of such names of battalions as “Aydar”, “Dnepr”, “Azov”, it is better to use the phrase “Ukrainian military”, in “one of the territorial battalions”, “Ukrainian army”. Instead of the “Vostok” battalion, it is better to say “Kadyrov mercenaries”.
Not only did no one show yet the hordes of Kadyrov's mercenaries and columns of Russian Asians, but the relevant recommendations of Dr. Goebbels from 22 June 1941 of the year still involuntarily emerge. They are addressed to German newsreaders, who are encouraged to choose among the Soviet prisoners of war for filming the weekly newsreel pronounced Asian and Semitic persons, thereby emphasizing that Germany saves Europe from the wild Asian-Jewish Bolshevik hordes.
But what about the current Ukrainian, in its essence, parochial-Nazi propaganda on the ordinary man in the street? Here are some examples of blog statements:
- Still not everyone understands that we are not negotiable with mad dogs from the Kremlin: there is a civilizational abyss between us.
- The contradictions between us are such that they can be destroyed only by war and the destruction of one of the parties: either Putin in Kiev or Maidan in Moscow.
- This is a war for the past - who inherits Kievan Rus.
- Moscow is a cancer tumor on the body of humanity, the main brake on its development.
- Without the liquidation of Moscow (not the city, but the principle), humanity will not move forward.
Let us try to sum up some of the ongoing information war. If a year ago there were still discussions on the topic: where should Ukraine go - to the Eurasian Union or the European one, then today there is no place for such disputes. After all the dramatic events, the choice was formally and unequivocally defined - the European way of development on the basis of the association agreement with Europe signed by President Poroshenko. However, after violent enthusiasm, the Verkhovna Rada did not immediately ratify the agreement, and even the date for discussing this issue in Parliament is unknown. The explanation most likely lies in the fact that the authorities are afraid of embarking on the practical implementation of the agreement. Ukraine is not ready for painful reforms - in the economic, political and legal reality. Suffice it to say that 90% of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights is not implemented here.
Europe, of course, benefits from a free trade zone, they say that it is also beneficial to Ukraine. However, the country today is not in a position to shoulder a heavy economic burden and suffer enormous losses. But most importantly, the second leading player in the political field of the non-independence - the United States - does not at all strive for the goals that united Europe has set itself. Americans are not interested in the Ukrainian economy, with the exception of gas supplies to Europe, which they seek to reduce. But their main task today is the creation in this territory of a military-field education hostile to Russia, even if due to the collapse of a single state. And here, more than ever, the topic of opposition to the Eurasian Union is relevant.
Recall that at the end of 2012, US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, completing her tenure as state secretary, stated categorically that the West, led by America, should not allow the creation of a full-fledged Eurasian Union. It can be said that the first stage has already been achieved - it was possible to reject Ukraine from the Eurasian vector. And in fact, new education is becoming increasingly Asian.
But at the same time, all of a sudden, a Crimea was joining Russia as an annoying and painful splinter. Today, American interests are voiced directly by officials in Kiev. Suffice to say that the head of the SBU Valentin Nalyvaichenko in the Shuster Live program of the First National TV Channel clearly identified the enemy in Russia, where he created the aggressive ideology of Eurasianism and Orthodox fundamentalism hostile to Ukraine and the entire civilized world. This vassal of Langley is unaware that he literally quotes the operational instructions of his masters, not being confused by the fact that Ukraine itself is also an Orthodox country. Or at least it was until recently.
What to do to Kiev? First, it is necessary to solve the problem of the rebellious Donbass - New Russia, and, secondly, then deal with the Crimea. At the same time, recently the actions of Kiev have become increasingly decisive and, not least, they meet with considerable support from the country's elites, the oligarchs who have ascended to power. The same policy is supported by considerable sections of the population who do not accept a truce with the Donbas. In any case, such a position is the result of the current ukronatsizm getting stronger.
Russia's position on the South-East is not at all offensive. It basically boils down to rhetoric about the need for peace in the region, with an emphasis on showing the victims of Ukrainian punishers and the suffering of the civilian population. There are regular reports of shelling of the border territories of Russia. Europe externally listens to the voice of Moscow, postponing the adoption of the next package of sanctions, but in Kiev and, most importantly, in Washington, Russia’s position is not taken into account. President Putin is extremely demonized - this is Hitler of our days, and Lavrov participating in international negotiations is none other than Ribbentrop.
In addition, Kiev’s armed conflict in the Donbass, which has been going on for three months, is objectively beneficial today and will become even more profitable in the coming months, when the economic and political situation in the country will worsen. The external enemy for the ruling regime is urgently needed and, moreover, numerous feudal armed formations of the oligarchs and the Right Sector can be used to combat it. The United States will give money for a war with Russia, so you should not dismiss the words about the liberation of the Crimea and the loud calls to attack the enemy on its territory.
In this regard, Moscow in the near future should clearly develop its position in relation to Novorossia, its leaders and the methods of the struggle there. In addition, the de facto formed Eurasian Economic Union should immediately be strengthened in every possible way. Here steps are important not only in the real economy, but also in determining the value priorities of a new education. At the same time, it is necessary to talk not about the development of a new ideology - the path is dead-end, since Russia itself does not yet have its own ideology.
The peoples of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan (as well as countries preparing for accession), and without a formal ideology, bind a lot. We have, by and large, a similar worldview, much in common in the rejection of the corrupting basis of being a pseudo liberalism of the modern West. But this association is not out of hatred, but on the preservation of its national and cultural identity. We cannot repeat the negative experience of Ukraine, where neighboring Slavic peoples managed to be put on opposite sides of the barricades, using the mechanisms for the formation of aggressive parochial Nazism. Now it will take years to overcome what happened. And, unfortunately, there will be considerable sacrifices.
- Alexander Andreevich Gorbatov, chief editor of the information bureau "Vostok-Center"
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.