"Vladimir Monomakh" at the factory sea trials

36
Official photos of the Central Design Bureau of Marine Engineering Rubin of the K-551 strategic-purpose missile cruiser Vladimir Monomakh, the third ship of the 955 project. The pictures were taken during the release of the Vladimir Monomakh to the final stage of the factory running tests from June to June. 11 July 7 of the year.

K-551 "Vladimir Monomakh" (serial number 203) was laid out at OJSC Northern Industrial Engineering Enterprise in Severodvinsk 19 in March 2006, removed from the 30 workshop in December 2012, and launched in 18 in January 2013. The first launch of the boat on the factory running tests took place 12 September 2013 of the year.



Atomic submarine strategic missile cruiser K-551 "Vladimir Monomakh" at the final stage of the factory running tests. June-July 2014 of the year (c) OJSC "TsKB MT" Rubin "


From left to right: the captain of the first rank Nadezhdin Alexander Mikhailovich
responsible delivery manager "Vladimir Monomakh" Usov Edward Valentinovich (in the middle),
leading military representative Mikhailin Alexey Vladimirovich.

"Vladimir Monomakh" at the factory sea trials















































Atomic submarine strategic missile cruiser K-551 "Vladimir Monomakh" at the final stage of the factory running tests. June-July 2014 of the year (c) OJSC "TsKB MT" Rubin "
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    12 July 2014 07: 11
    Pretty boy! Seven feet under the keel.
    1. +19
      12 July 2014 10: 45
      Quote: alma
      Pretty boy! Seven feet under the keel.

      Do you even imagine what will happen to the psyche of the captain if he is told this ... bully
      1. +3
        12 July 2014 10: 58
        Yes, I agree - a jamb hi
        1. +3
          12 July 2014 23: 02
          Better under the kilt! laughing
    2. +5
      12 July 2014 12: 21
      I agree that he is a very handsome "peacemaker".
      And seven feet is not enough for him to be seven thousand.
  2. +4
    12 July 2014 07: 37
    Ukraine wants 100.000.000.000 for Crimea.
    I hope they will not demand payment for the use of the name Monomakh for militaristic purposes soldier
  3. +1
    12 July 2014 08: 39
    tell me, what caused the use of the characteristic cutting bevel on new submarines?

    and yet, enlighten, why is it impossible to abandon the submarine felling? I understand - a navigating bridge, auxiliary mechanisms .. Why can't you make a normal entrance / exit to the interior of the submarine: let's say an ordinary door (even through the lock chamber), but in such a way as to abandon the "ladder"?
    1. agate
      +16
      12 July 2014 10: 18
      The deckhouse on the boat is needed so that, when surfacing, the retractable devices - periscope, antennas, locators, etc., are at a sufficient height above the water surface - the higher they are, the greater the periscope radius of action - the farther it sees. The height of the periscope is determined by the diameter of the solid hull in the area of ​​the Central Post - about 10 meters. In real life, the periscope extends 5-6 meters. The height of the felling is about the same. Walking at the periscope depth (for example, for RTM it is 10 meters), the hull of the boat turns out to be under water at a depth sufficient so that, in case of great waves, it does not bare and unmask the ship. The wheelhouse can sometimes be bare, but on the enemy's radar it will look like a small-sized target (if it will be visible at all) And the periscope and antennas are high enough and "see far away." In addition, the deckhouse, with the retractable lowered, can break through not very thick ice - it is designed for this. When surfacing, the waves overflow the hull, but do not reach the top of the cabin. When mooring, the overhang is better visible. In general, there are many more arguments in favor of felling which cannot be refused
    2. agate
      +10
      12 July 2014 11: 15
      By the way, I recall one curious case connected indirectly with the cutting of submarines.
      Around the summer of 1980, as a civilian specialist, I was in the Central post, standing on the outbuilding berth of the NSR boat, the sea curtains were played out and, accordingly, it was very windy. I work for myself calmly and suddenly the alarm - mooring to the top urgently - Fence carries us !!! We re-moor. I estimate that the nearest fence is on the lee side of two kilometers and what force the wind if it tore off and carries on us. And whether we have time to moor.
      I ask the watchman what happened, he explains that the Fence on Zvyozdochka was blown off by the wind and bears upon us perplexing. He clarifies that Fence is the nickname of one of the first missile boats, diesel ones, so named because of the disproportionately long cabin in which 3 missile silos were located. Her on Zvezdochka (and this is across the strait opposite on the island of Yagry) either repaired or prepared for disposal.
      A high and long cabin has a high windage, and that’s what broke it.
      It ended safely in the strait Fence tugs intercepted.
      1. agate
        +1
        12 July 2014 15: 39
        I will add that its official name, as I was told "Shield of the Motherland" and nicknamed FENCE.
    3. 0
      12 July 2014 21: 11
      Quote: Takashi
      tell me, what caused the use of the characteristic cutting bevel on new submarines?

      Due to the fact that almost the entire bow of the submarine is occupied by a powerful sonar antenna and torpedo tubes, the steering mechanisms of the horizontal rudders are put into the wheelhouse, which is why its reverse bevel is caused.
  4. 0
    12 July 2014 09: 39
    Quote: ImPerts
    Ukraine wants 100.000.000.000 for Crimea.
    I hope they will not demand payment for the use of the name Monomakh for militaristic purposes soldier

    Interrupt! We will set up ships of this class with this money! NATO generals will not have to drink Champagne !!!
  5. +1
    12 July 2014 11: 10
    Quote: KBPC50
    Quote: ImPerts
    Ukraine wants 100.000.000.000 for Crimea.
    I hope they will not demand payment for the use of the name Monomakh for militaristic purposes soldier

    Interrupt! We will set up ships of this class with this money! NATO generals will not have to drink Champagne !!!


    According to the calculations of the Germans alone, we have already sponsored this region for $ 250 billion.
    Do not even stutter, stupid people!
  6. malikszh
    0
    12 July 2014 11: 29
    It seems they said that they would remove the drawings with the name of the boats? what you enemy has not identified.
  7. shiman.1378
    +1
    12 July 2014 11: 51
    AND STILL THEY WANTED AFTER 1991 YEAR TO BE AS FRANCE ....
    1. +5
      12 July 2014 12: 18
      Quote: shiman.1378
      AND STILL THEY WANTED AFTER 1991 YEAR TO BE AS FRANCE ....

      And they think that association is cool!
      ... Mykola, and sho tse "associated membership"?
      - Well, godmother, Ukraine will participate in the EU.
      - So, will enter the EU?
      - No, it will not enter, but will participate.
      - Yak so?
      - Well, roughly, like eggs in sexual intercourse: participate, but do not enter. And so, hanging around ...
  8. +1
    12 July 2014 12: 14
    drinks Vivat Russia!
  9. +2
    12 July 2014 12: 40
    And yet, and yet another question on the cabin, more precisely on its enclosure. On other projects there are windows (not windows), in the bow (highlighted around the perimeter in white), in the manner of navigational cutting of surface ships, and here whether the photo is like that - everything is tightly brewed. I naively believed that they control the boat through a storm or rain? And now that, having given the bow of the fence the form of a stem, they have decreased flooding?
    It is also interesting to find out: why are there such "interesting" lines of the light hull on our boats? Everything is still well licked on this boat, but on Project 667BDR, the humps are absolutely ugly. Amers have all some kind of spindle-shaped, for the sake of hydrodynamics, there is nothing hook, and we have all the mates, mates; but it is really unusual.
    This reminds me of the design in rocketry: here is the Saturn-5, well, the tube is a tube, and our N-1, what a beautiful rocket, with delicate transitions between the steps, with a gradual increase in diameters to the base of the rocket. looks easy.
    1. agate
      +4
      12 July 2014 13: 55
      In the front part of the cabin from which control is carried out in some projects there really are windows because they are rectangular they are called a scraper they are tightly brewed in the frame and are made of very thick and durable glass since they must withstand the pressure of the incoming water flow at full speed under water, but according to my observations, they serve to illuminate the sill table under them in the daytime. Binoculars are put on the table, an intercom (I don’t know Kashtan now) a journal for recordings, howler control, etc. The watch at the top sits on a bench, about one waist protruding from the wheelhouse. But it can also completely hide from the spray behind the windows - this is on large BDRM boats, for example, but on the Shark there is just a hall. And on a smaller submarine, RTM, for example, with surface movement, you can raise the visor also from the glass in the frame, which will slightly protect against splashes.
      There is no steering wheel there. Once I begged our officer of the EVG to steer. He taught, say, or rather repeat the commands from below, "circulation to the right in 2 minutes ...... in 1 minute ...... in 30 seconds .... went .... and the boat turned to my indescribable joy.
    2. agate
      +2
      12 July 2014 14: 24
      And about the beauty, but the BDRM is a hunchback, but in the hump there is a missile deck, our missiles are longer than the American ones, but if you saw Komsomolets or a little machine, they’re beautiful,
  10. 0
    12 July 2014 13: 29
    Really beautiful !!!
    1. 0
      12 July 2014 21: 48
      Why is a beauty? He is a boy, this is an underwater missile cruiser. He is handsome.
  11. +2
    12 July 2014 16: 48
    Cool photos!!! Yes
  12. +1
    12 July 2014 19: 32
    About seven feet under the keel. Regardless of whether it is a ship or a boat, in any case, with this wish, they have 2 meters 10 centimeters to the bottom under the keel. Quite enough not to run aground.
  13. rul
    0
    12 July 2014 20: 37
    Are there parking sensors? Too close to shore.
  14. +1
    12 July 2014 23: 00
    But what about a mast without sails? again, soldiers must buy for their money ????
  15. 0
    12 July 2014 23: 11
    a joke is good
  16. Sergey.ru
    +6
    13 July 2014 10: 18
    I took part in the construction of this ship. Insanely strong order !!!
  17. +3
    13 July 2014 16: 40
    The good news wink Great photo selection. At the time of the commissioning and sea trials of the nuclear submarine 941 of the project in the early 80s, because of the terrible secrecy, we did not take photos smile
    1. agate
      0
      14 July 2014 13: 55
      I also went to 941 in Severodvinsk on the chassis in the summer of 1981. maybe lying next to them in 1 compartment on the lodgements instead of torpedoes. And they lived on Pionerskaya 6.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    13 July 2014 18: 47
    Yes, the special officers were catching up with horror. And as a result, a bunch of events "went missing" ... An amazingly small wheelhouse. Just like the 641st project. Although I've seen enough of the boats at the docks, I can imagine this iceberg.
  19. 0
    13 July 2014 22: 59
    And what about the Bulava?
    1. 0
      4 August 2014 06: 37
      still on trial
  20. 0
    14 July 2014 19: 23
    Seven feet under the keel!
    Can anyone explain why our submarines have wheelhouse so much different from the pin.dos.ovskih? do they have some kind of small height and size? Ours have more "forehead" and wider ones (most likely for breaking the ice, but the Americans also emerge from under the ice .... or are ours still used as a ram?)
    1. agate
      +2
      14 July 2014 21: 08
      Perhaps this is due to the fact that our boats have a greater difference between underwater and surface displacement than the states or, more simply, float higher on the surface. The United States, according to our concepts, is flooded and they have to cut higher for normal operation of the retractable devices, the number of which is approximately the same. Therefore, visually it seems that they have them slimmer. to the overall silhouette of the submarine. Or maybe it's a tribute to the design tradition. For example, externally, the submarines designed on Rubin and Sormovo are easily distinguished - different schools
      . And as for breaking the ice by cutting it’s a pinch — you can find wormwood — a divorce, you can let the air bubble lift the ice from below where it has an extremely embossed shape and breaks it, or you can open the ice with a torpedo.
      The diameter of the submarine is determined in the bow by the caliber and the number of torpedo tubes, and in the central part by the size of the reactors we have 2 in the same compartment on the port and starboard side, in the middle of the passage, and in the Americans, 1 reactor most often - they are already narrower.
  21. 0
    16 July 2014 21: 26
    everyone knows the advantages of diesel electric submarines; this is their noiselessness, but there is a jamb of small autonomous underwater passage. But what if we make an atomic carrier on which two or more diesel electric submarines can be based, well, like an aircraft carrier type, it’s only submarine for submarines. We kind of had such a project 664
  22. 0
    11 December 2014 16: 50
    Krasava, we nervously smoke on the sidelines, khe, khe)))