Judging by the recent events on the southeastern front, namely, the withdrawal of the Slavic garrison to Kramatorsk and later to Donetsk, all pocket bloggers of Surkov are given an installation to accuse Strelkov of fleeing Slavyansk.Even an emergency procedure from a distant closet got Kurginyan, shook off his mold and sent him to preach under the walls of Donetsk with a sermon. And judging by his speech, while the biggest claim to Strelkov is that he, with his garrison and most of the civilians of Slavyansk, did not die for Kurginyan ...
Kremlin journalists have a command claim on Strelkov and the militia that they have survived.
It is right for me, until the colic, it is ridiculous to listen to the accusations of cowardice Strelkov from those who have not served a day in the army and do not understand nicherta in tactics, strategy and operational art.
Therefore, for those who are on an armored train, I explain on the fingers.
In any war there is such a thing as tactics, strategy and operational art. These things define the very essence of the war, that is, the battles of the troops ...
If the critics of Strelkov accidentally find on the Internet the lieutenant’s reference book of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation called the Ground Forces Combat Regulations or any similar book on which West Point Academy students learn the basics of democratization of the indigenous peoples of Africa, then they might be lucky to find out that every military unit from state and public-political affiliation has such a chip, both combat effectiveness and combat capabilities.
These chips describe such unnecessary parameters as areas of the terrain on which military units can perform their tasks on the offensive, in defense and on the march. They talk about the possibility of inflicting fire damage to the enemy, depending on the types in service weapons. They show how many days and with which ammunition units can perform their tasks. And a lot of interesting things, which the ordinary sofa warrior does not need to know ...
So, in terms of tactics, strategy and military art, the battle for Slavyansk was lost. Yes it is!!! And to leave the garrison there for the slaughter, only so that the sofa patriots could beat themselves with a heel in the chest crying about the mythical “Stalingrad”, it was at least silly and wrong. There was neither “Stalingrad” nor “Leningrad” in Slavyansk, exactly as there was no life in the surrounded Slavyansk and did not stand under the Kramatorsk army of Chuikov and Tolbukhin.
After the punitive Kiev junta, using the factor of the mythical truce, significantly increased the combat capabilities and increased the combat effectiveness of its troops standing around Slavyansk, that is, they exceeded the similar parameters of the defensive forces under the command of Strelkov, the further fate of the defensive garrison was sealed and their final defeat was a matter of time. Soldiers armed with machine guns have no chance in confrontation with multiple rocket launchers and this is not a matter of policy, this is a matter of elementary calculation!
And in light of the fact that despite the promises of individual politicians, the second front was never opened, the further standing of Strelkov in Slavyansk would have led to the complete defeat of the Slavic garrison and, as a result, exposed a whole section of the front, which the Kiev punishers had to take advantage of.
The withdrawal of the Slavic garrison through Kramatorsk to Donetsk allowed Strelkov not only to bring combat-ready units to new, previously prepared lines of defense, but also to exhaust the enemy in a substantial way, due to the need to regroup forces and means and combat the DRG.
The positional retreat of Strelkov from Slavyansk means that the Kiev punishers will have to re-conduct reconnaissance of the defense of Novorossia, determine its weak areas, will necessitate the creation of new positional areas of attack, redeployment of rear units, and so on ...
Military machine Kiev punitive, she know is not so agile ...
All this is precious time, which Moscow politicians, I hope, use correctly to understand their place in stories Russian state.
And sofa coups, Surkov’s bloggers and old moldy whoopers, screaming about why Strelkov turned Slavyansk, today completely repeat what Zhukov said at headquarters, when he declared the need to leave Kiev.
And as we remember, after the surrender of Kiev, was Berlin ...