NATO can develop a new Strategic Concept

According to media reports, the North Atlantic Alliance intends to re-adjust its development plans. This means that the current NATO Strategic Concept, adopted in 2010, no longer fully meets the requirements of the time and must be updated. The Kommersant publication mentions that in the near future the leadership of the organization’s member countries will discuss the specifics of the current international situation and take appropriate measures. The result may be the adoption of a new Strategic Concept.

Recall, starting from 1949, once every few years, NATO leaders analyze the military-political situation in the world and present a plan for the future development of the organization. In the so-called Strategic concepts stipulate the paths of the military and political development of the organization, designed to be a timely response to current security threats. For example, the official reasons for the emergence of the 2010 Strategic Concept of the Year were international terrorism, the situation in the Balkans and Afghanistan, and the importance of cooperation with allies around the world. With these things in mind, a new Strategic Concept was created in 2010, called “Active Participation, Modern Defense”. It was made public in November 2010 during a meeting of NATO leaders in Lisbon (Portugal).

According to the 2010 Strategic Concept of the Year, NATO is a “unique community based on values ​​and committed to the principles of individual freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law”. The main tasks of the organization presented in the concept are collective defense, crisis management and security through cooperation. In addition, the authors of the document note the importance of international consultations and continuous reform of the organization.

Under the conditions of the time when the current Strategic Concept was created, there was a whole range of security challenges for NATO countries. In this regard, three main areas of activity of the North Atlantic Alliance were identified:
- Collective defense. The Washington Treaty Article 5 obliges NATO countries to help each other in the event of an attack on one of them. This feature of the organization is one of the key and is not subject to revision. Therefore, the Alliance should take care of the security of each country that is part of it;
- Crisis regulation. NATO has the political and military tools to deal with crises of any nature, either before or after, or during conflicts. In order to eliminate possible threats, an organization must effectively use both military and political methods. In this way, it is proposed to stabilize the situation, not allowing it to escalate into a conflict, end conflicts and ensure stability after their termination;
- Security based collaboration. The North Atlantic Alliance and its member countries can be affected by international events and can also influence them. For this reason, NATO should actively work with third countries and other international organizations to ensure security. In addition, it envisages the admission to NATO of countries that cooperate with the organization and meet the requirements.

The strategic concept of 2010 of the year considers nuclear and non-nuclear deterrence to be the main security tool. At the same time, it is argued that no state in the world is declared a potential adversary. Nevertheless, the Alliance intends to preserve and develop the forces and means aimed at eliminating existing and prospective threats. The main threats are terrorism, nuclear proliferation and other weapons mass destruction, as well as their means of delivery, cyber attacks and attacks related to ecology or resources.

In accordance with the current Strategic Concept, the North Atlantic Alliance must adhere to a holistic approach to crisis management. This means that NATO should act where it is necessary and possible to prevent crises or reduce their consequences. At the same time, the need to increase the number of structures coordinated to participate in such activities was noted. An additional tool to stabilize the situation in given regions is to help countries build their armed forces and improve the system of interaction between military and civilian structures.

In 2012, a renewed NATO development concept called Smart Defense was adopted in Chicago. The main feature of this document was the distribution of responsibilities between countries. Thanks to this proposal, the member countries of the organization were able to save on armaments, military equipment and other expenses without duplicating each other. However, Smart Defense recommendations are not actually being implemented, since countries have their own views on defense and their own opinions about potential threats. At the same time, 2010’s Active Participation, Modern Defense Strategic Concept of the Year becomes obsolete and needs to be replaced.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said earlier that the organization has learned from recent events in the Crimea and eastern regions of Ukraine. What kind of judgments and views emerged due to these events, it was not specified. Nevertheless, there is reason to believe that the Ukrainian crisis will be one of the main prerequisites for the emergence of a new Strategic Concept for NATO, and some of its events will be taken as the basis for the formation of new strategies that meet the requirements of the times.

Recent events have led to a deterioration of the situation in the international arena. NATO and Russia have taken diametrically opposed positions with regard to the Ukrainian events, which has already led to the imposition of sanctions and a host of unfriendly statements. The situation is unlikely to improve in the near future. Therefore, the new Strategic Concept of NATO, on which foreign specialists can currently work, can be based on the existing situation related to the deterioration of the international situation.

On the materials of the sites:
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    7 July 2014 09: 12
    What new concepts did NATO not accept, the end of NATO will be .. new times .. and they are still struggling with communism ..
    1. +1
      7 July 2014 23: 38
      Quote: parusnik
      .new times ..and they are still struggling with communism ..
      And now and then they fought with us, as they call "Russians". They have always been afraid and continue to be afraid of our Armed Forces. And they are preparing to confront our forces before the arrival of reinforcements from the States. When the SA could not contain tank avalanches, they dug nuclear wells on the border with the GDR, hoping to detain the "Russians" until the Yankes arrived.
  2. +8
    7 July 2014 10: 30
    NATO in its current state resembles a cat swollen with fat from American cream and sour cream .... now the new concept will be that this cat will be further smashed by the "maydanut" Ukrainian fat .... Only there is a high probability that "a cat "it will become mangy if it dares to make serious attacks towards Russia .... The West, once again, rattling its weapons against Russia, forgets the lessons of history about the futility of such threats and even more so about translating them into reality and again risks stepping on one and those same rake ..... So gentlemen compilers, learn history, learn history !!!! ...
  3. +3
    7 July 2014 11: 09
    What other concept, they will again say in beautiful words: "We need to bomb Russia"
  4. +4
    7 July 2014 11: 17
    NATO is "a unique community based on values ​​and committed to the principles of individual freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law."

    No comments!
  5. 0
    7 July 2014 11: 25
    speaking on the topic, it is simply impossible to ignore the planned regular summit of the North Atlantic Alliance will be held September 4-5, 2014 in South Wales.
    Back in November 2013, rasmussen: “This summit is important for NATO. We will mark the end of our ISAF mission at the end of 2014, as well as a new phase of our engagement in Afghanistan. We will take further steps to modernize our alliance to keep it strong flexible and ready for any security challenge. And we will reaffirm the link between Europe and North America, which is the source of our strength, our security and our success, "
    osummitagenda_ / sede120214natosummitagenda_en.pdf
  6. +1
    7 July 2014 15: 16
    Let them suck and God forbid choke ............
  7. +2
    7 July 2014 15: 20
    One must think that all NATO Strategic Concepts for S.K. Shoigu and his departments on the "Chinese river". Well, sort of like "according to the Yellow River." When planning all their concepts, let them not forget that on the modernized Topols there will be 3-4 BB in equipment, enough for all NATO, as they say "all sisters have nuclear earrings."
  8. Roshchin
    7 July 2014 15: 38
    Let yourself develop at least a CONCEPTION, at least a strategy. Or maybe they, as the old man used to say, Angel want to make excrement? So who is stopping them. Fuck yourself doing it. N.V. Gogol wrote that in our time so much printed paper has been divorced that you won’t think of anything soon to wrap it in it.
  9. +4
    7 July 2014 16: 23
    NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said earlier that the organization has learned from recent events in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine. What particular judgments and views appeared due to these events were not specified.

    NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, speaking at Chattam House, said that Russia is fighting smarter and faster than NATO, but added that even in the event of a peacekeeping or military entry of the Russian Federation into Ukraine, NATO will not fight nuclear Russia. '' If NATO is on Ukraine, Russia will be in Cuba. '
    1. anti-beetles
      7 July 2014 17: 25
      They won’t fight Russia, the goal was not another declaration of nuclear war, but weakening the braking of the development of the economy, well, under this business, strengthening our own. The ideal scenario is that we would have both in Ukraine our maidan, the overthrow of Putin and the civil war.
  10. 0
    7 July 2014 20: 06
    a unique community based on values ​​and committed to the principles of individual freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law

    The fact that this is a unique community is for sure, but as for the rest, oh guys obviously got excited.
  11. +1
    7 July 2014 21: 40
    Then do not go to a fortuneteller .. the new terrorists, in their opinion, the forgotten old ones .... you and I gentlemen and you ....

    What can I say NATO -> the organized criminal group walks under the pin.dos ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"